Premier Automotive Serices, Inc. v. Robert L. Flanagan and F. Brooks Royster, III; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment, 6072-6073 [E6-1589]

Download as PDF 6072 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Notices Paul I. Lewis, Office of the Science Advisor, Mail Code 8105R, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–8381; fax number (202) 564–2070; e-mail: lewis.paul@epa.gov. FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dated: January 25, 2006. William H. Farland, Chief Scientist, Office of the Science Advisor. [FR Doc. 06–1046 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [OPP–EPA–HQ–2005–0252; FRL–7762–3] Iodomethane Risk Assessment; Notice of Availability; Extension of Comment Period Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period. AGENCY: rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? The Agency included in the proposed rule a list of those who may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 14:55 Feb 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 List of Subjects Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. In addition to using EDOCKET https:// www.epa.gov/edocket/, you may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. A frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 is available at E-CFR Beta Site Two at https:// www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr/. EDOCKET, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system was replaced on November 25,2005, by an enhanced Federal-wide electronic docket management and comment system located at https:// www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions. Dated: February 1, 2006. Lois Rossi, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. II. What Action is EPA taking? EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of January 6, 2006, concerning the availability of EPA’s human health risk assessment and related documents for the fumigant iodomethane. These documents can be viewed in the docket. This document is extending the comment period for 15 days, from February 6, 2006 to February 21, 2006. DATES: Comments, identified by the docket identification number OPP– EPA–HQ–2005–0252, must be received on or before February 21, 2006. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register document of January 6, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary L. Waller, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–9354; fax number: (703) 308– 1825; e-mail address: waller.mary @epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? This document extends the public comment period established in the Federal Register issued on January 6, 2006 (71 FR 930). In that document, EPA made available the human health risk assessment for iodomethane. Iodomethane is a new chemical proposed for use as a pre-plant fumigant to control soil borne pests including weed seeds, nematodes, insects, and diseases in fields intended for commercial production of strawberries, tomatoes, peppers, turf, ornamentals (flowers grown for cutting, bulbs, and nursery plants), trees and vines. EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on February 6, 2006, to February 21, 2006. III. What is the Agency’s Authority for Taking this Action? Section 3 of FIFRA directs that ‘‘the Administrator may by regulation limit the distribution, sale, or use in any State of any pesticide that is not registered under this Act and that is not the subject of an experimental use permit under section 4 or an emergency exemption under section 18. IV. Do Any Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Apply to this Action? No. This action is not a rulemaking, it merely extends the date by which public comments on a risk assessment must be submitted to EPA as announced in a Notice of Availability that previously published in the Federal Register of January 6, 2006 (71 FR 930). PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests. [FR Doc. 06–1082 Filed 2–1–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Sunshine Act; Meeting DATE & TIME: Thursday, February 9, 2006 at 10 a.m. PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor). STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Correction and Approval of Minutes. Final Rules for Definition of Federal Election Activity. Routine Administrative Matters. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694–1200. Mary W. Dove, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 06–1112 Filed 2–2–06; 2:45 pm] BILLING CODE 6715–01–M FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION [Docket No. 06–03] Premier Automotive Serices, Inc. v. Robert L. Flanagan and F. Brooks Royster, III; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (‘‘Commission’’) by Premier Automotive Services, Inc., (‘‘Complainant’’), against Robert L. Flanagan and F. Brooks Royster, III, (‘‘Respondents’’). Complainant asserts that it is a Baltimore based import/ export vehicle processing center that operates as a marine terminal operator under The Shipping Act of 1984 (‘‘the Act’’). Complainant contends that Respondent Robert L. Flanagan is the Secretary of the Department of Transportation of the State of Maryland and the Chairman of the Maryland Port Commission, and Respondent F. Brooks Royster, III, is the Executive Director of the Maryland Port Administration. Complainant asserts that it has been a tenant of the Maryland Port Authority (‘‘MPA’’) since 1992, renewing the lease once in 1998 and then leasing month-to- E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1 rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Notices month since 2002. The Complainant further contends the MPA has demanded that Complainant vacate the premises after refusing to negotiate a commercially reasonable lease. Complainant alleges that the MPA and its Directors have violated Section 10(d)(1) of the Act (46 U.S.C. App. 1709(d)(1)) by failing to establish, observe, and enforce just and reasonable regulations and practices relating to or connected with receiving, handling, storing, or delivering property. In addition, Complainant alleges that Respondents violated Sections 10(d)(3) of the Act (46 USA App. § 1709(d)(3)) by unreasonably refusing to deal with a tenant, and 10(d)(4) of the Act (46 U.S.C. App. 1709(d)(4)) by giving undue or unreasonable preference or advantage or imposing undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage with respect to any person. Respondent asserts that the Commission has found that it might have jurisdiction to adjudicate a ‘‘* * * privately-initiated complaint proceeding against the directors of a state-run port rather than against the port.’’ Respondent prays that the Commission: seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining the Respondents to cease their unlawful treatment of Complainant and from leasing the lot to another company; declare that the Respondents have violated the Act as detailed above and direct the Respondents to cease all such violations; direct Respondents to offer Complainant a commercially viable lease for the lot in question; award Complainant reparations for actual injuries, pre and post-judgment interest, and litigation and attorney fees; and award such other and further relief as deemed just and proper. This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing shall include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of the presiding officer in this proceeding shall VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:55 Feb 03, 2006 Jkt 208001 be issued by January 31, 2007, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by May 31, 2007. Bryant L. VanBrakle, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–1589 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am] 6073 Dated: January 13, 2006. Felipe Mendoza, Associate Administrator, Office of Small Business Utilization, General Services Administration. [FR Doc. E6–1525 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–34–S BILLING CODE 6730–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Office of Small Business Utilization; Small Business Advisory Committee; Notification of a Public Meeting of the Small Business Advisory Committee Office of Small Business Utilization, GSA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is announcing a public meeting of the GSA Small Business Advisory Committee (the Committee). The meeting will take place February 21–22. The meeting will begin 1 p.m. Tuesday February 21 and conclude no later than 5 p.m. that day. The meeting will resume 9 a.m. Wednesday February 22 and conclude no later than 3 p.m. that day. The Committee will accept oral public comments at this meeting and has reserved a total of sixty minutes for this purpose. Members of the public wishing to reserve speaking time must contact Denis Peck in writing at: denis.peck@gsa.gov or by fax at (202) 208–5938, no later than one week prior to the meeting. ADDRESS: GSA Central Office Auditorium, 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denis Peck, Room 6021, GSA Building, 1800 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501–1021 or e-mail at denis.peck@gsa.gov. DATES: This notice is published in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. L. 92– 463). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The purpose of this meeting is to develop the topics generated during the previous meeting September 1, 2005; to receive briefings from small business topical experts, and to hear from interested members of the public on proposals to improve GSA’s small business contracting performance. PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), the National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting. Name: Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention (ACCLPP). Times and Dates: 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m., March 21, 2006. 8:30 a.m.–12:30 p.m., March 22, 2006. Place: Magnolia Hotel, 1100 Texas Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002. Telephone: (281)657–2664 or toll free 1–888–915–1110. Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. The meeting room accommodates approximately 75 people. Purpose: The committee shall provide advice and guidance to the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; the Assistant Secretary for Health; and the Director, CDC, regarding new scientific knowledge and technological developments and their practical implications for childhood lead poisoning prevention efforts. The committee shall also review and report regularly on childhood lead poisoning prevention practices and recommend improvements in national childhood lead poisoning prevention efforts. Matters to be Discussed: Update on the Primary Prevention Workgroup document; update on the Adverse Health Effects of Blood Lead Levels less than 10 Report; update from the Lead and Pregnancy Workgroup; update of strategic planning process by state and local childhood lead poisoning prevention programs; update on cooperation with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency enforcement of the Lead Disclosure Rule; and an update on research and program evaluation activities ongoing in the Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch. E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM 06FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6072-6073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 06-03]


Premier Automotive Serices, Inc. v. Robert L. Flanagan and F. 
Brooks Royster, III; Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment

    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (``Commission'') by Premier Automotive Services, 
Inc., (``Complainant''), against Robert L. Flanagan and F. Brooks 
Royster, III, (``Respondents''). Complainant asserts that it is a 
Baltimore based import/export vehicle processing center that operates 
as a marine terminal operator under The Shipping Act of 1984 (``the 
Act''). Complainant contends that Respondent Robert L. Flanagan is the 
Secretary of the Department of Transportation of the State of Maryland 
and the Chairman of the Maryland Port Commission, and Respondent F. 
Brooks Royster, III, is the Executive Director of the Maryland Port 
Administration. Complainant asserts that it has been a tenant of the 
Maryland Port Authority (``MPA'') since 1992, renewing the lease once 
in 1998 and then leasing month-to-

[[Page 6073]]

month since 2002. The Complainant further contends the MPA has demanded 
that Complainant vacate the premises after refusing to negotiate a 
commercially reasonable lease. Complainant alleges that the MPA and its 
Directors have violated Section 10(d)(1) of the Act (46 U.S.C. App. 
1709(d)(1)) by failing to establish, observe, and enforce just and 
reasonable regulations and practices relating to or connected with 
receiving, handling, storing, or delivering property. In addition, 
Complainant alleges that Respondents violated Sections 10(d)(3) of the 
Act (46 USA App. Sec.  1709(d)(3)) by unreasonably refusing to deal 
with a tenant, and 10(d)(4) of the Act (46 U.S.C. App. 1709(d)(4)) by 
giving undue or unreasonable preference or advantage or imposing undue 
or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage with respect to any person. 
Respondent asserts that the Commission has found that it might have 
jurisdiction to adjudicate a ``* * * privately-initiated complaint 
proceeding against the directors of a state-run port rather than 
against the port.'' Respondent prays that the Commission: seek a 
temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining the 
Respondents to cease their unlawful treatment of Complainant and from 
leasing the lot to another company; declare that the Respondents have 
violated the Act as detailed above and direct the Respondents to cease 
all such violations; direct Respondents to offer Complainant a 
commercially viable lease for the lot in question; award Complainant 
reparations for actual injuries, pre and post-judgment interest, and 
litigation and attorney fees; and award such other and further relief 
as deemed just and proper.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the presiding officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by January 31, 
2007, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by May 
31, 2007.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-1589 Filed 2-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P