Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Proposed Renewal Without Change; Comment Request; Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Various Financial Institutions., 6131-6132 [E6-1524]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
to new traffic (traffic that did not exist
when a line was spun off), and illustrate
their application by presenting the
outcome (access/no access) under
hypothetical situations with diagrams
illustrating the relationships between
the parties. The paper barrier provisions
do not grant enforcement rights to
shippers. Rather, the RIA provides for
non-binding arbitration under Board
auspices and creates a Rail Industry
Working Group (RIWG) that can issue
interpretations and provide a forum for
discussion.
By petition filed on December 21,
1998, in STB Ex Parte No. 575, WCTL
asked the Board to initiate a separate
rulemaking to consider eliminating
unreasonable paper barriers. WCTL
argued that the agreement negotiated
between AAR and ASLRRA did not
adequately deal with the barriers. WCTL
proposed rules that would restrict paper
barriers. By decision served on March 2,
1999, the Board deferred action on
WCTL’s petition in order to gain
experience under the AAR/ASLRRA
agreement with respect to paper
barriers.
By petition filed on March 21, 2005,
WCTL renewed its 1998 request for
rulemaking on the paper barrier issue.
WCTL asserts that, since 1999, there
have been significant changes in the
Board’s policies regarding competition,
citing in particular the Board’s revised
merger guidelines for Class I railroads.4
WCTL argues that, given the benefit of
experience, unreasonable paper barriers
should be subject to challenge by
shippers as well as short lines and that
any restrictions on these provisions
should cover pre-existing traffic as well
as new traffic. WCTL proposes specific
rules that would establish a rebuttable
presumption that a paper barrier is
unreasonable and contrary to the public
interest if the paper barrier (1) lasts
longer than 5 years, (2) includes any
financial penalty for interchanging
traffic with another carrier, or (3)
includes a credit for interchanging
traffic with the seller or landlord
railroad against a rental or sale price
that reflects a return on the ‘‘fair market
value’’ of the properties sold or leased
that is greater than the railroad
industry’s cost of capital.
Replies in support of WCTL’s petition
were filed on April 29, 2005, by Entergy
(a) General Premise: If the requested Access or
routing helps the connecting Short Line and does
not harm the Large railroad, then the request should
be approved as it will improve shipper rail service
while strengthening the rail industry.
4 See Major Rail Consolidation Procedures, 5
S.T.B. 539 (2001). WCTL argues that these
procedures require that the Board be proactive in
taking steps to promote competition.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Feb 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
Services, Inc. (Entergy); and on May 2,
2005, by Albany & Eastern Railroad
Company (AERC) and jointly by
Arkansas Electric Cooperative
Corporation and Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
(Arkansas Electric/Entergy).
Replies in opposition to WCTL’s
petition were filed on May 2, 2005, by:
ASLRRA; AAR; and RIWG. On May 5,
2005, the Union Pacific Railroad
Company filed a statement rebutting
statements in the replies of Arkansas
Electric/Entergy and Entergy, to which
Entergy responded on May 17, 2005.
BNSF Railway Company responded to
the AERC filing on May 20, 2005.
We are especially interested in
comments that: (a) Discuss our statutory
authority to address pre-existing paper
barriers; (b) identify and describe
existing paper barriers so that we can
determine the extent of the problem
alleged by WCTL; (c) identify and
quantify any problems experienced by
shippers as a result of paper barriers; (d)
address the short and long term
economic impacts of paper barriers; (e)
address the effectiveness of the existing
AAR/ASLRRA agreement on paper
barriers; and (f) include information
about the RIA, including the most recent
version, amendment history,
interpretations, proceedings,
handbooks, etc.
Board filings, decisions, and notices
are available on its Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
Decided: January 30, 2006.
By the Board, Chairman Buttrey and Vice
Chairman Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–1558 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network; Proposed Renewal Without
Change; Comment Request; AntiMoney Laundering Programs for
Various Financial Institutions.
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As part of our continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, we invite comment
on a proposed renewal, without change,
to information collections found in
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6131
existing regulations requiring money
services businesses, mutual funds,
operators of credit card systems, dealers
in precious metals, stones, or jewels,
and certain insurance companies to
develop and implement written antimoney laundering programs reasonably
designed to prevent those financial
institutions from being used to facilitate
money laundering and the financing of
terrorist activities. Comment also is
invited on an existing proposed
regulation that would require
unregistered investment companies to
establish and maintain written antimoney laundering programs and to file
a notice with us identifying themselves
and providing related basic information.
This request for comments is being
made pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
DATES: Written comments are welcome
and must be received on or before April
7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39,
Vienna, VA 22183, Attention: AntiMoney Laundering Program Comments.
Comments also may be submitted by
electronic mail to the following Internet
address: regcomments@fincen.gov, again
with a caption, in the body of the text,
‘‘Attention: Anti-Money Laundering
Program Comments.’’
Inspection of comments. Comments
may be inspected, between 10 a.m. and
4 p.m., in our reading room in
Washington, DC. Persons wishing to
inspect the comments submitted must
request an appointment by telephoning
(202) 354–6400 (not a toll free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,
Regulatory Policy and Programs
Division at (800) 949–2732.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Abstract: The Director of the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
is the delegated administrator of the
Bank Secrecy Act. The Act authorizes
the Director to issue regulations to
require all financial institutions defined
as such in the Act to maintain or file
certain reports or records that have been
determined to have a high degree of
usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory
investigations or proceedings, or in the
conduct of intelligence or counterintelligence activities, including
analysis, to protect against international
terrorism, and to implement anti-money
laundering programs and compliance
procedures.1
1 Public Law 91–508, as amended and codified at
12 U.S.C. 1829b, 12 U.S.C. 1951–1959 and 31 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
Continued
06FEN1
6132
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
Regulations implementing section
5318(h)(1) of the Act are found in part
at 31 CFR 103.125, 103.130, 103.132,
103.135, 103.137, and 103.140. In
general, the regulations require financial
institutions, as defined in 31 U.S.C.
5312(a)(2) and 31 CFR 103.11 to
establish, document, and maintain antimoney laundering programs as an aid in
protecting and securing the U.S.
financial system.
1. Titles: Anti-money laundering
programs for money services businesses
(31 CFR 103.125), Anti-money
laundering programs for mutual funds
(31 CFR 103.130), Anti-money
laundering programs for operators of
credit card systems (31 CFR 103.135).
Office of Management and Budget
Control Number: 1506–0020.
Abstract: Money services businesses,
mutual funds, and operators of credit
card systems are required to develop
and implement written anti-money
laundering programs. A copy of the
written program must be maintained for
five years.
Current Action: There is no change to
existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of
Respondents: 203,006.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
Estimated Number of Responses:
203,006.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
Estimated Number of Hours: 203,006.
Estimated at one hour per respondent.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
2. Title: Anti-money laundering
programs for unregistered investment
companies (31 CFR 103.132).
Office of Management and Budget
Control Number: 1506–0028.
Abstract: This proposed rule would
require unregistered investment
companies to establish and maintain
written anti-money laundering
programs. A copy of the written
program would have to be maintained
for five years. These companies would
5311–5332. Language expanding the scope of the
Bank Secrecy Act to intelligence or counterintelligence activities to protect against
international terrorism was added by section 358 of
the Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Ob struct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of
2001, Public Law 107–56.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:55 Feb 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
also be required to file notices with us,
identifying themselves and providing
related basic information.
Current Action: There is no change to
the proposed regulation.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit institutions
Description of Recordkeepers and
Responders: Unregistered investment
companies as defined in 31 CFR
103.132(a).
Estimated Number of Recordkeepers:
5,000.
Estimated Average Annual Burden
per Recordkeeper: The estimated
average burden associated with the
recordkeeping requirement in this
proposed rule is one hour per
recordkeeper.
Estimated Total Annual
Recordkeeping Burden: 5,000 hours.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,000.
Estimated Average Annual Burden
Per Respondent: The estimated average
burden associated with the notice
requirement in this proposed rule is 30
minutes per respondent.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden: 2,500 hours.
3. Title: Anti-money laundering
programs for dealers in precious metals,
precious stones, or jewels (31 CFR
103.140).
Office of Management and Budget
Control Number: 1505–0030.
Abstract: Dealers in precious metals,
stones, or jewels are required to
establish and maintain written antimoney laundering programs. A copy of
the written program must be maintained
for five years.
Current Action: There is no change to
existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of
Respondents = 20,000.
Estimated Number of Responses =
20,000.
Estimated Number of Hours =
20,000.
4. Title: Anti-money laundering
programs for insurance companies (31
CFR 103.137).
Office of Management and Budget
Control Number: 1506–0035.
Abstract: Insurance companies are
required to establish and maintain
written anti-money laundering
programs. A copy of the written
program must be maintained for five
years.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Current Action: There is no change to
existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other
for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of
Respondents = 1,200.
Estimated Number of Responses =
1,200.
Estimated Number of Hours =
1,200.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a valid control number
assigned by the Office of Management
and Budget. Records required to be
retained under the Bank Secrecy Act
must be retained for five years.
Generally, information collected
pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act is
confidential but may be shared as
provided by law with regulatory and
law enforcement authorities.
Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval. All
comments will become a matter of
public record. Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected: (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance and purchase of services to
provide information.
Dated: January 30, 2006.
William D. Langford, Jr.,
Associate Director, Regulatory Policy and
Programs Division, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. E6–1524 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6131-6132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1524]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Proposed Renewal Without
Change; Comment Request; Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Various
Financial Institutions.
AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, we invite comment on a proposed renewal, without
change, to information collections found in existing regulations
requiring money services businesses, mutual funds, operators of credit
card systems, dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels, and
certain insurance companies to develop and implement written anti-money
laundering programs reasonably designed to prevent those financial
institutions from being used to facilitate money laundering and the
financing of terrorist activities. Comment also is invited on an
existing proposed regulation that would require unregistered investment
companies to establish and maintain written anti-money laundering
programs and to file a notice with us identifying themselves and
providing related basic information. This request for comments is being
made pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-
13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
DATES: Written comments are welcome and must be received on or before
April 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183, Attention: Anti-
Money Laundering Program Comments. Comments also may be submitted by
electronic mail to the following Internet address:
regcomments@fincen.gov, again with a caption, in the body of the text,
``Attention: Anti-Money Laundering Program Comments.''
Inspection of comments. Comments may be inspected, between 10 a.m.
and 4 p.m., in our reading room in Washington, DC. Persons wishing to
inspect the comments submitted must request an appointment by
telephoning (202) 354-6400 (not a toll free number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network,
Regulatory Policy and Programs Division at (800) 949-2732.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Abstract: The Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
is the delegated administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act. The Act
authorizes the Director to issue regulations to require all financial
institutions defined as such in the Act to maintain or file certain
reports or records that have been determined to have a high degree of
usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or
proceedings, or in the conduct of intelligence or counter-intelligence
activities, including analysis, to protect against international
terrorism, and to implement anti-money laundering programs and
compliance procedures.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 91-508, as amended and codified at 12 U.S.C.
1829b, 12 U.S.C. 1951-1959 and 31 U.S.C. 5311-5332. Language
expanding the scope of the Bank Secrecy Act to intelligence or
counter-intelligence activities to protect against international
terrorism was added by section 358 of the Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Ob
struct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001, Public Law 107-56.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6132]]
Regulations implementing section 5318(h)(1) of the Act are found in
part at 31 CFR 103.125, 103.130, 103.132, 103.135, 103.137, and
103.140. In general, the regulations require financial institutions, as
defined in 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) and 31 CFR 103.11 to establish,
document, and maintain anti-money laundering programs as an aid in
protecting and securing the U.S. financial system.
1. Titles: Anti-money laundering programs for money services
businesses (31 CFR 103.125), Anti-money laundering programs for mutual
funds (31 CFR 103.130), Anti-money laundering programs for operators of
credit card systems (31 CFR 103.135).
Office of Management and Budget Control Number: 1506-0020.
Abstract: Money services businesses, mutual funds, and operators of
credit card systems are required to develop and implement written anti-
money laundering programs. A copy of the written program must be
maintained for five years.
Current Action: There is no change to existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of Respondents: 203,006.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
Estimated Number of Responses: 203,006.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
Estimated Number of Hours: 203,006. Estimated at one hour per
respondent.
31 CFR 103.125 = 200,000.
31 CFR 103.130 = 3,000.
31 CFR 103.135 = 6.
2. Title: Anti-money laundering programs for unregistered
investment companies (31 CFR 103.132).
Office of Management and Budget Control Number: 1506-0028.
Abstract: This proposed rule would require unregistered investment
companies to establish and maintain written anti-money laundering
programs. A copy of the written program would have to be maintained for
five years. These companies would also be required to file notices with
us, identifying themselves and providing related basic information.
Current Action: There is no change to the proposed regulation.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions
Description of Recordkeepers and Responders: Unregistered
investment companies as defined in 31 CFR 103.132(a).
Estimated Number of Recordkeepers: 5,000.
Estimated Average Annual Burden per Recordkeeper: The estimated
average burden associated with the recordkeeping requirement in this
proposed rule is one hour per recordkeeper.
Estimated Total Annual Recordkeeping Burden: 5,000 hours.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,000.
Estimated Average Annual Burden Per Respondent: The estimated
average burden associated with the notice requirement in this proposed
rule is 30 minutes per respondent.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden: 2,500 hours.
3. Title: Anti-money laundering programs for dealers in precious
metals, precious stones, or jewels (31 CFR 103.140).
Office of Management and Budget Control Number: 1505-0030.
Abstract: Dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels are
required to establish and maintain written anti-money laundering
programs. A copy of the written program must be maintained for five
years.
Current Action: There is no change to existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of Respondents = 20,000.
Estimated Number of Responses = 20,000.
Estimated Number of Hours = 20,000.
4. Title: Anti-money laundering programs for insurance companies
(31 CFR 103.137).
Office of Management and Budget Control Number: 1506-0035.
Abstract: Insurance companies are required to establish and
maintain written anti-money laundering programs. A copy of the written
program must be maintained for five years.
Current Action: There is no change to existing regulations.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business and other for-profit institutions.
Burden: Estimated Number of Respondents = 1,200.
Estimated Number of Responses = 1,200.
Estimated Number of Hours = 1,200.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid
control number assigned by the Office of Management and Budget. Records
required to be retained under the Bank Secrecy Act must be retained for
five years. Generally, information collected pursuant to the Bank
Secrecy Act is confidential but may be shared as provided by law with
regulatory and law enforcement authorities.
Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected: (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of
operation, maintenance and purchase of services to provide information.
Dated: January 30, 2006.
William D. Langford, Jr.,
Associate Director, Regulatory Policy and Programs Division, Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network.
[FR Doc. E6-1524 Filed 2-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P