Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish, Crab, Salmon, and Scallop Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area and Gulf of Alaska, 6031-6032 [06-1083]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by the proposed rule. To
determine whether your facility is
regulated by the proposed rule, you
should examine the applicability
criteria in 40 CFR 63.320 of subpart M
(1993 Dry Cleaning NESHAP). If you
have any questions regarding the
applicability of the proposed rule to a
particular entity, contact the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Submitting CBI: Do not submit
information which you claim to be CBI
to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information submitted on a disk or CD
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information marked as CBI will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition
to being available in the docket, an
electronic copy of the proposed rule is
also available on the WWW. Following
the Administrator’s signature, a copy of
the proposed rule will be posted on
EPA’s Technology Transfer Network
(TTN) policy and guidance page for
newly proposed or promulgated rules at
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN
provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air
pollution control.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
Comment Period
We received a request to extend the
public comment period to March 23,
2006. We agreed to this request,
therefore, the public comment period
will now end on March 23, 2006, rather
than February 6, 2006.
How can I get copies of the proposed
amendments and other related
information?
EPA has established the official
public docket for the proposed
rulemaking under docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2005–0155. Information on
how to access the docket is presented
above in the ADDRESSES section. In
addition, information may be obtained
from the webpage for the proposed
rulemaking at: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Feb 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
atw/dryperc/dryclpg.html, or from the
Federal Register (70 FR 75884,
December 21, 2005).
Dated: January 27, 2006.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc.06–1070 Filed 2–3–06 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[I.D. 013006I]
RIN 0648–AT09
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish, Crab,
Salmon, and Scallop Fisheries of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area and Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of availability of
proposed amendments to fishery
management plans; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) has
submitted Amendments 78 and 65 to
the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI), Amendments 73 and 65 to the
FMP for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA), Amendments 16 and 12
to the FMP for Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands King and Tanner Crabs,
Amendments 7, 9, and 11 to the FMP for
the Scallop Fishery Off Alaska, and
Amendments 7 and 8 to the FMP for
Salmon Fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone Off the Coast of Alaska.
These amendments, if approved, would
revise the FMPs by identifying and
authorizing protection measures for
essential fish habitat (EFH) and habitat
areas of particular concern (HAPCs) in
all five FMPs and update the biological
and management information in the
scallop FMP. This action is necessary to
revise the descriptions of EFH in the
FMPs based on the best available
scientific information and to protect
areas that have important habitat
features for the sustainability of
managed fish stocks. This action also is
necessary to provide an updated FMP
for scallop fishery management. This
action is intended to promote the goals
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6031
and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the FMPs,
and other applicable laws. Comments
from the public are welcome.
DATES: Comments on the amendments
must be received by close of business on
April 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Records Officer. Comments may be
submitted by:
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Hand delivery: 709 West 9th Street,
Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
• Fax: 907–586–7557.
• E-mail: EFH-HAPC-NOA–0648–
AT09@noaa.gov. Include in the subject
line the following document identifier:
EFH-HAPC NOA. E-mail comments,
with or without attachments, are limited
to 5 megabytes.
• Webform at the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions at that site for submitting
comments.
Copies of FMP amendments, maps of
the EFH and HAPC areas, the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for EFH, and the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(EA/RIR/IRFA) for HAPCs may be
obtained from the same address or from
the Alaska Region NMFS website at
www.fakr.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie Brown, 907–586–7228 or
melanie.brown@noaa.gov.
The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that the
Council submit any FMP amendment it
prepares to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial
approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving
a FMP amendment, immediately
publish a notice in the Federal Register
that the amendment is available for
public review and comment.
Section 303(a)(7) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that each FMP
describe and identify EFH, minimize to
the extent practicable the adverse effects
of fishing on EFH, and identify other
measures to promote the conservation
and enhancement of EFH. The Council
adopted the EFH and HAPC
amendments in February 2005. If
approved by NMFS, these amendments
would revise the FMPs by updating the
description and identification of EFH,
changing the identification of HAPCs,
and authorizing protection measures for
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6032
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 24 / Monday, February 6, 2006 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS1
EFH and HAPCs. This action would
continue the Council’s policy of
implementing precautionary
conservation measures for the Alaska
fisheries, as described in the
management policies and objectives
added to the groundfish FMPs in 2004
(69 FR 31091, June 2, 2004).
The Council developed the EFH and
HAPC FMP amendments as a result of
a new and thorough EIS analysis of the
measures needed to identify and
conserve EFH in Alaska. The analysis
stemmed from a United States District
Court order resulting from litigation that
challenged the approval of previous
EFH amendments to the Council’s FMPs
(American Oceans Campaign et al. v.
Daley et al., Civil Action N. 99–982–
GK).
The amendments specify EFH and
HAPC provisions for each FMP. The
following summarizes the amendments
under each group of provisions. The EIS
for EFH, the EA/RIR/IRFA for HAPC,
and maps of the proposed fishery
restrictions described below are
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
EFH Amendments
The Council recommended three
actions for EFH. Action 1 would revise
the description and identification of
EFH in the FMPs using new information
and improved mapping. This action
would ensure the best scientific
information available is used to describe
and identify EFH in the FMPs, as
required by 50 CFR 600.815(a)(1)(ii)(B).
Action 2 would adopt an approach for
identifying HAPCs. The amendments
would rescind existing HAPCs and
would add a procedure for identifying
HAPCs based on specific sites within
EFH that are necessary to address
particular habitat concerns.
Action 3 would establish several
types of management areas in the BSAI
and the GOA to minimize the adverse
effects of fishing on EFH. The Aleutian
Islands Habitat Conservation Area
(AIHCA) would consist of the entire
Aleutian Islands subarea except for
specified areas that have supported the
highest groundfish catches in the past.
The AIHCA would be closed to all
nonpelagic trawling to protect relatively
undisturbed habitats. The Council
determined that the AIHCA would
provide a balance between continued
fishing in the Aleutian Islands subarea
and protection of sensitive habitats such
as cold water corals. This closure would
include habitat areas that are not
identified as EFH. Specifically, the
AIHCA would include habitat areas that
extend beyond the limits of EFH for
groundfish, crabs, and scallops. The
Council has identified the water column
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Feb 03, 2006
Jkt 208001
in all of these areas as EFH for marine
salmon, but the bottom habitats have
not been well surveyed, and therefore
are not considered EFH. The Council
developed the AIHCA primarily to
address potential effects on EFH, but
included these habitat areas outside of
EFH as part of the Council’s overall
effort to be precautionary and preclude
damage to habitats that may be
important for Council managed species.
The EFH amendments also would
establish six Aleutian Islands Coral
Habitat Protection Areas (AICHPAs) that
would be closed to all bottom contact
gear (nonpelagic trawl, hook-and-line,
pot, dredge, and dinglebar gears) and to
anchoring by fishing vessels. These
areas contain especially diverse and
fragile living habitat structures that are
particularly sensitive to the impacts of
bottom contact gear and anchoring, and
have long recovery times once damaged.
The Council determined that a higher
level of protection is appropriate for
these uncommon habitats.
In the GOA, the EFH amendments
would establish ten GOA Slope Habitat
Conservation Areas (GOASHCAs) where
nonpelagic trawling for groundfish
would be prohibited. These areas would
provide refuge for rockfish and other
managed species and long term
protection for corals. Pelagic trawl gear
used in the directed pollock fishery
would be allowed in the AIHCA,
AICHPAs, and GOASHCAs only in an
off-bottom mode based on the
performance standard contained in 50
CFR 679.7(a)(14).
HAPC Amendments
The Council also recommended three
actions to identify and manage HAPCs.
Action 1 identifies 15 Alaska Seamount
Habitat Protection Areas where all
bottom contact gear and anchoring by
fishing vessels would be prohibited.
Seamounts provide unique
oceanographic and living habitat
features that provide important habitat
for fish. Action 2 establishes the GOA
Coral Habitat Protection Areas where all
bottom contact gear and anchoring by
fishing vessels would be prohibited.
During survey work using submersible
dives, NMFS identified dense thickets
of Primnoa sp. coral in these areas.
These living habitat structures grow
very slowly, are sensitive to disturbance
by bottom contact gear and anchoring,
have long recovery times, and have been
identified as potential refugia for
managed species. Restricting bottom
contact gear and anchoring would
ensure the living structures would be
protected from fishing activities that
may adversely impact the habitat.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Action 3 would designate the Bowers
Ridge Habitat Conservation Zone
(BRHCZ) as a HAPC located in the BSAI
and would prohibit mobile bottom
contact fishing gear (nonpelagic trawl,
dredge, and dinglebar gear) in this area.
The Council recommended limiting the
fishery prohibition for the BRHCZ to
mobile bottom contact gear until more
research can be done in this area to
determine if additional restrictions
would be appropriate for fixed gear
fisheries. The mobile bottom contact
gear prohibition would provide
precautionary management for Bowers
Ridge and the Ulm Plateau based on the
limited information available for these
sites located in the BRHCZ.
Scallop FMP Update
In April 2005, the Council
unanimously voted to adopt
Amendment 11, a housekeeping
amendment that would update the
scallop FMP to reflect the current
management of the scallop fishery and
recent biological information. No
implementing regulations would be
required for this amendment.
Public Comments
NMFS is soliciting public comments
on the proposed amendments through
April 7, 2006. A proposed rule that
would implement the EFH and HAPC
amendments will be published in the
Federal Register for public comment at
a later date, following NMFS’ evaluation
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act
procedures. Public comments on the
proposed rule must be received by the
end of the comment period on the
amendments in order to be considered
in the approval/disapproval decision on
the amendments. All comments
received on the amendments by the end
of the comment period, whether
specifically directed to the amendments
or to the proposed rule, will be
considered in the approval/disapproval
decision. Comments received after that
date will not be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision on the
amendments. To be considered,
comments must be received—not just
postmarked or otherwise transmitted—
by close of business on the last day of
the comment period.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06–1083 Filed 2–3–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6031-6032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-1083]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[I.D. 013006I]
RIN 0648-AT09
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish,
Crab, Salmon, and Scallop Fisheries of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area and Gulf of Alaska
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of availability of proposed amendments to fishery
management plans; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has
submitted Amendments 78 and 65 to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(BSAI), Amendments 73 and 65 to the FMP for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA), Amendments 16 and 12 to the FMP for Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands King and Tanner Crabs, Amendments 7, 9, and 11 to the FMP for
the Scallop Fishery Off Alaska, and Amendments 7 and 8 to the FMP for
Salmon Fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone Off the Coast of
Alaska. These amendments, if approved, would revise the FMPs by
identifying and authorizing protection measures for essential fish
habitat (EFH) and habitat areas of particular concern (HAPCs) in all
five FMPs and update the biological and management information in the
scallop FMP. This action is necessary to revise the descriptions of EFH
in the FMPs based on the best available scientific information and to
protect areas that have important habitat features for the
sustainability of managed fish stocks. This action also is necessary to
provide an updated FMP for scallop fishery management. This action is
intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the
FMPs, and other applicable laws. Comments from the public are welcome.
DATES: Comments on the amendments must be received by close of business
on April 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Records Officer. Comments may be submitted by:
Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Hand delivery: 709 West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
Fax: 907-586-7557.
E-mail: EFH-HAPC-NOA-0648-AT09@noaa.gov. Include in the
subject line the following document identifier: EFH-HAPC NOA. E-mail
comments, with or without attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes.
Webform at the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Copies of FMP amendments, maps of the EFH and HAPC areas, the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for EFH, and the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA) for HAPCs may be obtained from the same address
or from the Alaska Region NMFS website at www.fakr.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brown, 907-586-7228 or
melanie.brown@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that the
Council submit any FMP amendment it prepares to NMFS for review and
approval, disapproval, or partial approval. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
also requires that NMFS, upon receiving a FMP amendment, immediately
publish a notice in the Federal Register that the amendment is
available for public review and comment.
Section 303(a)(7) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that each
FMP describe and identify EFH, minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH, and identify other measures to
promote the conservation and enhancement of EFH. The Council adopted
the EFH and HAPC amendments in February 2005. If approved by NMFS,
these amendments would revise the FMPs by updating the description and
identification of EFH, changing the identification of HAPCs, and
authorizing protection measures for
[[Page 6032]]
EFH and HAPCs. This action would continue the Council's policy of
implementing precautionary conservation measures for the Alaska
fisheries, as described in the management policies and objectives added
to the groundfish FMPs in 2004 (69 FR 31091, June 2, 2004).
The Council developed the EFH and HAPC FMP amendments as a result
of a new and thorough EIS analysis of the measures needed to identify
and conserve EFH in Alaska. The analysis stemmed from a United States
District Court order resulting from litigation that challenged the
approval of previous EFH amendments to the Council's FMPs (American
Oceans Campaign et al. v. Daley et al., Civil Action N. 99-982-GK).
The amendments specify EFH and HAPC provisions for each FMP. The
following summarizes the amendments under each group of provisions. The
EIS for EFH, the EA/RIR/IRFA for HAPC, and maps of the proposed fishery
restrictions described below are available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
EFH Amendments
The Council recommended three actions for EFH. Action 1 would
revise the description and identification of EFH in the FMPs using new
information and improved mapping. This action would ensure the best
scientific information available is used to describe and identify EFH
in the FMPs, as required by 50 CFR 600.815(a)(1)(ii)(B). Action 2 would
adopt an approach for identifying HAPCs. The amendments would rescind
existing HAPCs and would add a procedure for identifying HAPCs based on
specific sites within EFH that are necessary to address particular
habitat concerns.
Action 3 would establish several types of management areas in the
BSAI and the GOA to minimize the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. The
Aleutian Islands Habitat Conservation Area (AIHCA) would consist of the
entire Aleutian Islands subarea except for specified areas that have
supported the highest groundfish catches in the past. The AIHCA would
be closed to all nonpelagic trawling to protect relatively undisturbed
habitats. The Council determined that the AIHCA would provide a balance
between continued fishing in the Aleutian Islands subarea and
protection of sensitive habitats such as cold water corals. This
closure would include habitat areas that are not identified as EFH.
Specifically, the AIHCA would include habitat areas that extend beyond
the limits of EFH for groundfish, crabs, and scallops. The Council has
identified the water column in all of these areas as EFH for marine
salmon, but the bottom habitats have not been well surveyed, and
therefore are not considered EFH. The Council developed the AIHCA
primarily to address potential effects on EFH, but included these
habitat areas outside of EFH as part of the Council's overall effort to
be precautionary and preclude damage to habitats that may be important
for Council managed species.
The EFH amendments also would establish six Aleutian Islands Coral
Habitat Protection Areas (AICHPAs) that would be closed to all bottom
contact gear (nonpelagic trawl, hook-and-line, pot, dredge, and
dinglebar gears) and to anchoring by fishing vessels. These areas
contain especially diverse and fragile living habitat structures that
are particularly sensitive to the impacts of bottom contact gear and
anchoring, and have long recovery times once damaged. The Council
determined that a higher level of protection is appropriate for these
uncommon habitats.
In the GOA, the EFH amendments would establish ten GOA Slope
Habitat Conservation Areas (GOASHCAs) where nonpelagic trawling for
groundfish would be prohibited. These areas would provide refuge for
rockfish and other managed species and long term protection for corals.
Pelagic trawl gear used in the directed pollock fishery would be
allowed in the AIHCA, AICHPAs, and GOASHCAs only in an off-bottom mode
based on the performance standard contained in 50 CFR 679.7(a)(14).
HAPC Amendments
The Council also recommended three actions to identify and manage
HAPCs. Action 1 identifies 15 Alaska Seamount Habitat Protection Areas
where all bottom contact gear and anchoring by fishing vessels would be
prohibited. Seamounts provide unique oceanographic and living habitat
features that provide important habitat for fish. Action 2 establishes
the GOA Coral Habitat Protection Areas where all bottom contact gear
and anchoring by fishing vessels would be prohibited. During survey
work using submersible dives, NMFS identified dense thickets of Primnoa
sp. coral in these areas. These living habitat structures grow very
slowly, are sensitive to disturbance by bottom contact gear and
anchoring, have long recovery times, and have been identified as
potential refugia for managed species. Restricting bottom contact gear
and anchoring would ensure the living structures would be protected
from fishing activities that may adversely impact the habitat.
Action 3 would designate the Bowers Ridge Habitat Conservation Zone
(BRHCZ) as a HAPC located in the BSAI and would prohibit mobile bottom
contact fishing gear (nonpelagic trawl, dredge, and dinglebar gear) in
this area. The Council recommended limiting the fishery prohibition for
the BRHCZ to mobile bottom contact gear until more research can be done
in this area to determine if additional restrictions would be
appropriate for fixed gear fisheries. The mobile bottom contact gear
prohibition would provide precautionary management for Bowers Ridge and
the Ulm Plateau based on the limited information available for these
sites located in the BRHCZ.
Scallop FMP Update
In April 2005, the Council unanimously voted to adopt Amendment 11,
a housekeeping amendment that would update the scallop FMP to reflect
the current management of the scallop fishery and recent biological
information. No implementing regulations would be required for this
amendment.
Public Comments
NMFS is soliciting public comments on the proposed amendments
through April 7, 2006. A proposed rule that would implement the EFH and
HAPC amendments will be published in the Federal Register for public
comment at a later date, following NMFS' evaluation under the Magnuson-
Stevens Act procedures. Public comments on the proposed rule must be
received by the end of the comment period on the amendments in order to
be considered in the approval/disapproval decision on the amendments.
All comments received on the amendments by the end of the comment
period, whether specifically directed to the amendments or to the
proposed rule, will be considered in the approval/disapproval decision.
Comments received after that date will not be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision on the amendments. To be considered,
comments must be received--not just postmarked or otherwise
transmitted--by close of business on the last day of the comment
period.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: January 31, 2006.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 06-1083 Filed 2-3-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S