Uinta National Forest, Utah; Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental Impact Statement, 5640-5641 [E6-1397]
Download as PDF
5640
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2006 / Notices
Dated: January 24, 2006.
James L. Lowe,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–975 Filed 2–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta National Forest, Utah; Oil and
Gas Leasing Environmental Impact
Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Uinta National Forest is
initiating the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement that
would determine under what conditions
(stipulations) leases would be issued.
The EIS would analyze all lands with a
federally-owned leasable mineral estate
within the Uinta National Forest.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be postmarked or
received within 45 days from date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register to ensure full consideration.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected December 2006
and the final environmental impact
statement is expected November 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please submit substantive
issues or concerns to the Responsible
Official: Dan Dallas, Acting Forest
Supervisor, Uinta National Forest, P.O.
Box 1428, 88 West 100 North, Provo,
UT, 84603; phone (801) 342–5100; fax
(801) 342–5185; e-mail: commentsintermtn-uinta@fs.fed.us. E-mailed
comments must be submitted in MS
Word (*.doc) or rich text format (*.rtf)
and should include the project name in
the subject line. Oral comments as well
as written comments may also be
submitted at the above address during
regular business hours of 8 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday-Friday, excluding Federal
holidays.
Each individual or representative
from each organization submitting
substantive comments must either sign
the comments or otherwise verify
identity in order to attain appeal
eligibility. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record for this project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam
Jarnecke, Environmental Coordinator, or
Kim Martin, Minerals Staff Officer,
Supervisor’s Office of the Uinta
National Forest at the address and
phone number listed above.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Feb 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
The EIS
analysis area includes the entire Uinta
National Forest (approximately 897,400
acres), with the exception of designated
wilderness areas (approximatley 58,400
acres) and privately held mineral
resources in the Strawberry Reservoir
area which cover approximately 61,300
acres, for a total study area of
approximately 777,700 acres.
The Department of Interior, Bureau of
Land Management (BLM), acts as the
onshore leasing agent for the Federal
government. The Federal Onshore Oil
and Gas Leasing Reform Act states that
the BLM cannot lease over the objection
of the Forest Service and authorizes the
Forest Service to regulate all surfacedistrubing activities conducted pursuant
to a lease. Therefore, the Forest Service
has established an incremental decisionmaking framework for the consideration
of oil and gas leasing activites on
National Forest System lands. In
general, the various steps that are
undertaken are: (1) Forest Service
leasing analysis; (2) Forest Service
notification to BLM of lands
administratively available for leasing;
(3) Forest Service review and
verification of BLM leasing proposals;
(4) BLM assessment of Forest Service
conditions of surface occupancy; (5)
BLM offers lease; (6) BLM issues lease;
(7) Forest Service review and approval
of lessee’s surface use plan of
operations; (8) BLM review and
approval of lessee’s application for
permit to drill; and (9) ensures final
reclamation.
Based upon the Forest Service leasing
analysis (step 1 from above) the Forest
Service decides whether or not lands
will be available for leasing and decides
under what conditions (stipulations) the
leases will be issued. This EIS will
fullfill this step.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to complete a forest-wide leasing
analysis. The need is to be responsive to
requests for oil and gas leasing on the
Forest. Currently only a portion of the
Forest is available for leasing and most
of that area has already been leased.
Also, the proposed action is needed in
order to comply with the Federal
Onshore Oil and Gas Reform Act of
1987 which requires the Forest Service
to analyze lands under its jurisdiciton
that are legally avialable for leasing in
accordance with the National
Enviornmental Policy Act of 1969.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would make
leasing decisions, including
identification of stipulations as required
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by 36 CFR 228.102(d) for the Uinta
National Forest System lands. Leasing
stipulations outlined on page 3–7 of the
2003 LRMP will be the basis of the
stipulations applied forest-wide. The
Proposed Action may result in an
amendment to the Uinta Revised Forest
Plan.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action,
the No Action alternative will be
analyzed in detail. The No Action
Alternative would continue current
management of leasing activities on
approximately 197,000 acres of the
Uinta National Forest. The remainder of
the Uinta National Forest would
continue to have no leasing
opportunities.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Bureau of Land Management, Salt
Lake Field Office, and the State of Utah
are cooperating agencies for this project.
Responsible Official
Dan Dallas, Acting Forest Supervisor,
Uinta National Forest, P.O. Box 1428, 88
West 100 North, Provo, UT, 84603.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide
which lands with federal mineral
ownership are administratively
available for oil and gas leasing and
determine what conditions
(stipulations) would be applied to future
oil leases on the Uinta National Forest.
This decision will not result in grounddisturbing activities within National
Forest System lands administered by the
Uinta NF such as exploration, drilling,
and/or field development. Any ground
disturbing activity that may be proposed
subsequent to leasing would require
further review and environmental
analysis prior to approval, as outlined in
current Federal regulations (36 CFR
228.107).
Scoping Process
One public scoping meeting will be
held using an informal workshop format
on Friday, March 3, 2006, at the Provo
City Library’s Bullock Room from 5
p.m.–7 p.m. The Library is located at
550 North University Avenue, Provo,
UT 84601.
Preliminary Issues
Issues which may be analyzed in both
alternatives include: the socioeconomic
effects of oil and gas leasing and
subsequent activities; effects on
terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna,
including threatened and endangered
species, sensitive species, and
management indicator species; effects
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 22 / Thursday, February 2, 2006 / Notices
on both developed and dispersed
recreation; effects on air resources;
effects on water resources, including
wetlands, floodplains, riparian areas,
culinary and municipal water systems,
and groundwater; effects on visual
resources; effects of leasing stipulations
and mitigation measures on oil and gas
exploration and development activity;
effects on soils and geologic hazards;
effects on cultural and traditional
heritage resources; effects on
transportation; effects on upland
vegetation; effects on riparian
vegetation; effects on inventoried
roadless areas; effects on other mineral
resource extraction activities; and
effects on noxious weeds and invasive
species.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45-days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Feb 01, 2006
Jkt 208001
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Dated: January 27, 2006.
Dan S. Dallas,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E6–1397 Filed 2–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eastern Washington Cascades
Provincial Advisory Committee and the
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington
Cascades Provincial Advisory
Committee and the Yakima Provincial
Advisory Committee will meet on
Tuesday, February 28, 2006 at the
Chelan County Fire District #1
Sunnyslope Fire Station, 206 Easy
Street, Wenatchee, Washington. The
meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and
continue until 3 p.m. During this
meeting we will become acquainted
with the collaborative learning process.
Members wil recommend how
collaborative learning might be used to
develop a land allocation option for
public consideration during the
preparation of a revised forest plan for
the Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests. All Eastern Washington
Cascades and Yakima Province
Advisory Committee meetings are open
to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting
to Paul Hart, Designated Federal
Official, USDA, Wenatchee National
Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee,
Washington 98801, 509–664–9200.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5641
Dated: January 27, 2006.
Paul Hart,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests.
[FR Doc. 06–953 Filed 2–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast and
Willamette Province Advisory
Committee will meet in Corvallis, OR,
February 22, 2006. The theme of the
meeting is Introduction/Overview and
Business Planning. The agenda
includes: NW Forest Plan, BLM RMP
Presentation, and Public Comment.
DATES: The meeting will be held
February 22, 2006, beginning at 9 a.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the LaSells Stewart Center, 100 LaSells
Stewart Center, Corvallis, Oregon 97331.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joni
Quarnstrom, Public Affairs Specialist,
Siuslaw National Forest, 541–750–7075,
or write to Siuslaw National Forest
Supervisor, P.O. Box 1148, Corvallis,
OR 97339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public. Council
Discussion is limited to Forest Service/
BLM staff and Council Members. Lunch
will be on your won. A public input
session will be at 11:30 for fifteen
minutes. The meeting is expected to
adjourn around 4 p.m.
Dated: January 27, 2006.
Mary Zuschlag,
Supervisory Wildlife Biologist.
[FR Doc. 06–954 Filed 2–1–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Tehama County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to
be covered include: (1) Introductions,
(2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public
Comment, (4) Go Over Applications
Received, (5) Hammer Loop Phase I
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5640-5641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1397]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta National Forest, Utah; Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental
Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Uinta National Forest is initiating the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement that would determine under what
conditions (stipulations) leases would be issued. The EIS would analyze
all lands with a federally-owned leasable mineral estate within the
Uinta National Forest.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be postmarked
or received within 45 days from date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register to ensure full consideration. The draft
environmental impact statement is expected December 2006 and the final
environmental impact statement is expected November 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please submit substantive issues or concerns to the
Responsible Official: Dan Dallas, Acting Forest Supervisor, Uinta
National Forest, P.O. Box 1428, 88 West 100 North, Provo, UT, 84603;
phone (801) 342-5100; fax (801) 342-5185; e-mail: comments-intermtn-
uinta@fs.fed.us. E-mailed comments must be submitted in MS Word (*.doc)
or rich text format (*.rtf) and should include the project name in the
subject line. Oral comments as well as written comments may also be
submitted at the above address during regular business hours of 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday-Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
Each individual or representative from each organization submitting
substantive comments must either sign the comments or otherwise verify
identity in order to attain appeal eligibility. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those
who comment, will be considered part of the public record for this
project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Jarnecke, Environmental
Coordinator, or Kim Martin, Minerals Staff Officer, Supervisor's Office
of the Uinta National Forest at the address and phone number listed
above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EIS analysis area includes the entire
Uinta National Forest (approximately 897,400 acres), with the exception
of designated wilderness areas (approximatley 58,400 acres) and
privately held mineral resources in the Strawberry Reservoir area which
cover approximately 61,300 acres, for a total study area of
approximately 777,700 acres.
The Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), acts
as the onshore leasing agent for the Federal government. The Federal
Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act states that the BLM cannot lease
over the objection of the Forest Service and authorizes the Forest
Service to regulate all surface-distrubing activities conducted
pursuant to a lease. Therefore, the Forest Service has established an
incremental decision-making framework for the consideration of oil and
gas leasing activites on National Forest System lands. In general, the
various steps that are undertaken are: (1) Forest Service leasing
analysis; (2) Forest Service notification to BLM of lands
administratively available for leasing; (3) Forest Service review and
verification of BLM leasing proposals; (4) BLM assessment of Forest
Service conditions of surface occupancy; (5) BLM offers lease; (6) BLM
issues lease; (7) Forest Service review and approval of lessee's
surface use plan of operations; (8) BLM review and approval of lessee's
application for permit to drill; and (9) ensures final reclamation.
Based upon the Forest Service leasing analysis (step 1 from above)
the Forest Service decides whether or not lands will be available for
leasing and decides under what conditions (stipulations) the leases
will be issued. This EIS will fullfill this step.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to complete a forest-wide
leasing analysis. The need is to be responsive to requests for oil and
gas leasing on the Forest. Currently only a portion of the Forest is
available for leasing and most of that area has already been leased.
Also, the proposed action is needed in order to comply with the Federal
Onshore Oil and Gas Reform Act of 1987 which requires the Forest
Service to analyze lands under its jurisdiciton that are legally
avialable for leasing in accordance with the National Enviornmental
Policy Act of 1969.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action would make leasing decisions, including
identification of stipulations as required by 36 CFR 228.102(d) for the
Uinta National Forest System lands. Leasing stipulations outlined on
page 3-7 of the 2003 LRMP will be the basis of the stipulations applied
forest-wide. The Proposed Action may result in an amendment to the
Uinta Revised Forest Plan.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action, the No Action alternative will
be analyzed in detail. The No Action Alternative would continue current
management of leasing activities on approximately 197,000 acres of the
Uinta National Forest. The remainder of the Uinta National Forest would
continue to have no leasing opportunities.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Bureau of Land Management, Salt Lake Field Office, and the
State of Utah are cooperating agencies for this project.
Responsible Official
Dan Dallas, Acting Forest Supervisor, Uinta National Forest, P.O.
Box 1428, 88 West 100 North, Provo, UT, 84603.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will decide which lands with federal mineral
ownership are administratively available for oil and gas leasing and
determine what conditions (stipulations) would be applied to future oil
leases on the Uinta National Forest. This decision will not result in
ground-disturbing activities within National Forest System lands
administered by the Uinta NF such as exploration, drilling, and/or
field development. Any ground disturbing activity that may be proposed
subsequent to leasing would require further review and environmental
analysis prior to approval, as outlined in current Federal regulations
(36 CFR 228.107).
Scoping Process
One public scoping meeting will be held using an informal workshop
format on Friday, March 3, 2006, at the Provo City Library's Bullock
Room from 5 p.m.-7 p.m. The Library is located at 550 North University
Avenue, Provo, UT 84601.
Preliminary Issues
Issues which may be analyzed in both alternatives include: the
socioeconomic effects of oil and gas leasing and subsequent activities;
effects on terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna, including
threatened and endangered species, sensitive species, and management
indicator species; effects
[[Page 5641]]
on both developed and dispersed recreation; effects on air resources;
effects on water resources, including wetlands, floodplains, riparian
areas, culinary and municipal water systems, and groundwater; effects
on visual resources; effects of leasing stipulations and mitigation
measures on oil and gas exploration and development activity; effects
on soils and geologic hazards; effects on cultural and traditional
heritage resources; effects on transportation; effects on upland
vegetation; effects on riparian vegetation; effects on inventoried
roadless areas; effects on other mineral resource extraction
activities; and effects on noxious weeds and invasive species.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45-days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Dated: January 27, 2006.
Dan S. Dallas,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E6-1397 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P