Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP; Notice of Application, 5305 [E6-1243]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 21 / Wednesday, February 1, 2006 / Notices Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible online at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 10, 2006. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–1237 Filed 1–31–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP06–50–000] Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP; Notice of Application cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES January 24, 2006. Take notice that on January 18, 2006, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (Panhandle), P.O. Box 4967, Houston, Texas 77210–4967, filed in Docket No. CP06–50–000, an application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), for authorization to: (1) Install a new receipt point with Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern), (2) replace and construct new minor facilities to reconfigure a portion of Panhandle’s Liberal 24-inch 100-Line to add the capability of bi-directional flow, (3) relocate certain form and city tap facilities; and (4) install metering and appurtenant facilities, located in Seward, Meade, Clark, Ford and Kiowa Counties, Kansas, all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with Commission and open to public inspection. Specifically, Panhandle proposes to: (1) Relocate 80 farm tap customers and 8 city-gate delivery point customers form Panhandle’s 100-Line to Panhandle’s existing 200-Line and 300Line, (2) replace an existing launcher with a new 24-inch bi-directional launcher/receiver at the Liberal VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:49 Jan 31, 2006 Jkt 208001 Compressor Station, (3) install two new 24-inch bi-directional launcher/receiver facilities, including a 12-inch ultrasonic meter skid and appurtenant facilities at the existing Mullinville Receipt Meter location; and (4) install a new 24-inch tee, 24-inch valve, and connecting piping at the Mullinville Receipt Meter location to the outlet of the new meter skid. The cost of the proposed project is estimated to be $4.96 million. Any questions regarding this application should be directed to William W. Grygar, Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at (713) 989–7000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP, 5444 Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest. Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be placed on the Commission’s PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5305 environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission’s environmental review process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission’s final order. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Comment Date: February 14, 2006. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–1243 Filed 1–31–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RP96–312–155] Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Termination of Negotiated Rate Arrangement January 25, 2006. Take notice that on January 12, 2005, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing a notice of termination of a negotiated rate arrangement between Tennessee and United States Gypsum Company (United States Gypsum) to become effective June 1, 2005. Tennessee states that this filing serves as notice of termination of a negotiated rate arrangement between Tennessee and United States Gypsum because United States Gypsum successfully bid in an open season in May 2005 a request to change the primary delivery point of its existing Firm Transportation Agreement and to change the rate from a negotiated rate to the applicable Tennessee Maximum Tariff Demand and Commodity rates. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-1243]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-50-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP; Notice of Application

January 24, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 18, 2006, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company, LP (Panhandle), P.O. Box 4967, Houston, Texas 77210-4967, 
filed in Docket No. CP06-50-000, an application pursuant to section 
7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), for authorization to: (1) Install a 
new receipt point with Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern), (2) 
replace and construct new minor facilities to reconfigure a portion of 
Panhandle's Liberal 24-inch 100-Line to add the capability of bi-
directional flow, (3) relocate certain form and city tap facilities; 
and (4) install metering and appurtenant facilities, located in Seward, 
Meade, Clark, Ford and Kiowa Counties, Kansas, all as more fully set 
forth in the request which is on file with Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Specifically, Panhandle proposes to: (1) Relocate 80 farm tap 
customers and 8 city-gate delivery point customers form Panhandle's 
100-Line to Panhandle's existing 200-Line and 300-Line, (2) replace an 
existing launcher with a new 24-inch bi-directional launcher/receiver 
at the Liberal Compressor Station, (3) install two new 24-inch bi-
directional launcher/receiver facilities, including a 12-inch 
ultrasonic meter skid and appurtenant facilities at the existing 
Mullinville Receipt Meter location; and (4) install a new 24-inch tee, 
24-inch valve, and connecting piping at the Mullinville Receipt Meter 
location to the outlet of the new meter skid. The cost of the proposed 
project is estimated to be $4.96 million.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to 
William W. Grygar, Vice President, Rates and Regulatory Affairs, at 
(713) 989-7000, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP, 5444 
Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by 
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or 
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person 
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by 
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all 
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must 
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a 
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only 
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders 
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have 
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with 
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and 
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. 
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will 
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's 
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project 
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly 
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of 
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments 
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be 
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive 
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings 
associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed 
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will 
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by 
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents 
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court 
review of the Commission's final order.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' 
link.
    Comment Date: February 14, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-1243 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.