Modification of Offshore Airspace Areas: Gulf of Alaska Low and Control 1487L; AK, 4981-4983 [06-898]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2003–15471; Airspace
Docket No. 03–AWA–6]
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of the Minneapolis Class
B Airspace Area; MN
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action corrects a final
rule published in the Federal Register
on November 28, 2005 (70 FR 71233),
Airspace Docket No. 03–AWA–6, FAA
Docket No. FAA–2003–15471. In that
rule, inadvertent errors were made in
the legal description of the Minneapolis
Class B airspace area. This action
corrects those errors.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, February 16,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Rohring, Airspace and Rules,
Office of System Operations Airspace
and AIM, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Background
On November 28, 2005, a final rule
was published in the Federal Register
modifying the Minneapolis, MN Class B
Airspace Area (70 FR 71233), Airspace
Docket No. 03–AWA–6, FAA Docket
No. FAA–2003–15471. In that final rule,
inadvertent errors were made in the
legal descriptions for some of the areas;
in that, the radials (from navigational
aids) were listed in degrees magnetic
rather than true. Normally, radials
contained in a legal description are
expressed in degrees true rather than
magnetic. This eliminates the need for
periodic rulemaking to update the
radials as magnetic variation changes
over time. Radials contained in the legal
description are then converted from true
to magnetic for charting purposes.
However, because the legal description
in this rule listed magnetic values rather
than true, it became evident that the
charted radials were not in the same
locations as presented in the public
meetings, studied by the ad hoc
committee, and depicted in the Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and
final rule. This action corrects the
radials contained in the legal
description to degrees true. This will
align the charted depiction of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Jan 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
airspace with the intent of the
Minneapolis Class B airspace area
modification. When these new radials
are converted and depicted on
aeronautical charts, they will be the
same numerical values as those
presented in public meetings, studied
by the ad hoc committee, and contained
in the NPRM and final rule.
Due to the significant impact that the
erroneous Class B boundary locations
would have on aircraft operations
surrounding the MSP terminal area, the
FAA finds good cause, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d), for making this
amendment effective in less than 30
days in order to promote the safe and
efficient handling of air traffic in the
area.
Corrections to Final Rule
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me, the legal description
for the Minneapolis Class B Airspace
Area, as published in the Federal
Register on November 28, 2005, (70 FR
71233), Docket No. 03–AWA–6, FAA
Docket No. FAA–2003–15471, and
incorporated in 14 CFR 71.1, is
corrected as follows:
I
4981
the Gopher 121° radial clockwise to the
Flying Cloud 121° radial, excluding Area A,
Area B, and Area C previously described.
Area E. That airspace extending from 7,000
feet MSL to and including 10,000 feet MSL
within a 30-mile radius of I–MSP DME from
the Gopher 301° radial clockwise to the
Gopher 358° radial, and from the Gopher
091° radial clockwise to the Gopher 121°
radial, and from the Flying Cloud 121° radial
clockwise to the Gopher 166° radial, and
from the Gopher 176° radial clockwise to the
Flying Cloud 301° radial excluding that
airspace between a 25-mile radius and a 30mile radius of I–MSP DME from the Flying
Cloud 121° radial clockwise to the Gopher
166° radial, and excluding Area A, Area B,
Area C, and Area D previously described.
Area F. That airspace extending from 6,000
feet MSL to and including 10,000 feet MSL
within a 30-mile radius of I–MSP DME from
the Gopher 166° radial clockwise to the
Gopher 176° radial, excluding Area A, Area
B, Area C, and Area D previously described.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 25,
2006.
Kenneth McElroy,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. 06–900 Filed 1–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PART 71—[AMENDED]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
§ 71.1
Federal Aviation Administration
[Amended]
On page 71233, correct the legal
description of the Minneapolis Class B
Airspace, to read as follows:
I
14 CFR Part 71
Paragraph 3000
Class B Airspace
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22708; Airspace
Docket No. 05–AAL–32]
*
*
RIN 2120–AA66
*
*
*
AGL MN B Minneapolis, MN [Corrected]
Minneapolis-St. Paul International (WoldChamberlain) Airport (Primary Airport)
(Lat. 44°53′00″ N., long. 93°13′01″ W.)
Gopher VORTAC
(Lat. 45°08′45″ N., long. 93°22′24″ W.)
Flying Cloud VOR/DME
(Lat. 44°49′33″ N., long. 93°27′24″ W.)
Point of Origin: Minneapolis-St. Paul
International (Wold-Chamberlain)
Airport DME Antenna (I–MSP DME)
(Lat. 44°52′28″ N., long. 93°12′24″ W.)
Boundaries.
Area A. That airspace extending upward
from the surface to and including 10,000 feet
MSL within a 6-mile radius of I–MSP DME.
Area B. That airspace extending from 2,300
feet MSL to and including 10,000 feet MSL
within an 8.5-mile radius of I–MSP DME,
excluding Area A previously described.
Area C. That airspace extending from 3,000
feet MSL to and including 10,000 feet MSL
within a 12-mile radius of I–MSP DME,
excluding Area A and Area B previously
described.
Area D. That airspace extending from 4,000
feet MSL to and including 10,000 feet MSL
within a 20-mile radius of I–MSP DME and
including that airspace within a 30-mile
radius from the Flying Cloud 301° radial
clockwise to the Gopher 301° radial and from
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Modification of Offshore Airspace
Areas: Gulf of Alaska Low and Control
1487L; AK
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action amends the Gulf
of Alaska Low and Control 1487L
Offshore airspace areas in Alaska.
Specifically, this action modifies the
Gulf of Alaska Low and Control 1487L
airspace areas in the vicinity of the
Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK, by
lowering the affected controlled
airspace floor to 700 feet mean sea level
(MSL) for the Gulf of Alaska Low, and
1,200 feet MSL for Control 1487L. The
FAA is taking this action to provide
additional controlled airspace for the
safety of aircraft executing instrument
flight rules (IFR) operations at the
Yakutat Airport.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 13,
2006.
Ken
McElroy, Airspace and Rules, Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
4982
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
System Operations Airspace and AIM,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
History
On December 8, 2005, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to
modify the Gulf of Alaska Low and
Control 1487L Offshore Control Areas in
Alaska (70 FR 72950). Interested parties
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal. No
comments were received.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to
modify the Gulf of Alaska Low airspace
area, AK, by lowering the floor to 700
feet MSL in the vicinity of Yakutat
Airport, Yakutat, AK. Additionally, the
Control 1487L airspace area, AK, will be
lowered from 5,500 feet MSL to 1,200
feet MSL in the vicinity of Yakutat
Airport. These areas will provide
controlled airspace beyond 12 miles
from the shoreline of the United States
where there is a requirement to provide
IFR enroute Air Traffic Control services
and within which the United States is
applying domestic air traffic control
procedures. This rule establishes
controlled airspace sufficient in size to
support the Terminal Arrival Area
associated with new IFR operations at
Yakutat Airport, AK. The FAA
Instrument Flight Procedures
Production and Maintenance Branch
has developed three new standard
instrument approach procedures (SIAP),
revised seven SIAPs and revised one
departure procedure for the Yakutat
Airport. Additional controlled airspace
extending upward from 700 feet and
1,200 feet above the surface in
international airspace is created by this
action. The airspace is sufficient to
support IFR operations at the Yakutat
Airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Jan 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
ICAO Considerations
As part of this rule relates to
navigable airspace outside the United
States, the notice of this action is
submitted in accordance with the
International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) International
Standards and Recommended Practices.
The application of International
Standards and Recommended Practices
by the FAA, Office of System
Operations Airspace and AIM, Airspace
& Rules, in areas outside United States
domestic airspace, is governed by the
Convention on International Civil
Aviation. Specifically, the FAA is
governed by Article 12 and Annex 11,
which pertain to the establishment of
necessary air navigational facilities and
services to promote the safe, orderly,
and expeditious flow of civil air traffic.
The purpose of Article 12 and Annex 11
is to ensure that civil aircraft operations
on international air routes are
performed under uniform conditions.
The International Standards and
Recommended Practices in Annex 11
apply to airspace under the jurisdiction
of a contracting state, derived from
ICAO. Annex 11 provisions apply when
air traffic services are provided and a
contracting state accepts the
responsibility of providing air traffic
services over high seas or in airspace of
undetermined sovereignty. A
contracting state accepting this
responsibility may apply the
International Standards and
Recommended Practices that are
consistent with standards and practices
utilized in its domestic jurisdiction.
In accordance with Article 3 of the
Convention, state-owned aircraft are
exempt from the Standards and
Recommended Practices of Annex 11.
The United States is a contracting state
to the Convention. Article 3(d) of the
Convention provides that participating
state aircraft will be operated in
international airspace with due regard
for the safety of civil aircraft. Since this
action involves, in part, the designation
of navigable airspace outside the United
States, the Administrator has consulted
with the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Defense in accordance with
the provisions of Executive Order
10854.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9N,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated September 1, 2005, and
effective September 15, 2005, is
amended as follows:
I
Paragraph 6007
Offshore Airspace Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
Gulf of Alaska Low, AK [Amended]
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet MSL bounded by a line beginning at a
point where the 12-mile offshore limit
intersects long. 144°30′00″ W.; thence
eastward 12 miles off shore and parallel to
the shoreline to lat. 59°10′36″ N., long.
139°31′10″ W.; to lat. 59°02′49″ N., long.
139°47′45″ W.; to lat. 59°27′12″ N., long.
140°31′10″ W.; thence westward along the
south boundary of V–440 to long. 144°30′00″
W.; thence northward along long. 144°30′00″
W.; to the point of beginning.
*
*
*
*
*
Control 1487L [Amended]
That airspace extending upward from
5,500 feet MSL within the area bounded by
a line beginning at lat. 58°19′58″ N., long.
148°55′07″ W.; to lat. 59°08′34″ N., long.
147°16′06″ W.; thence counterclockwise via
the arc of a 149.5-mile radius centered on the
Anchorage VOR/DME to the intersection of
the 149.5-mile radius arc and a point 12
miles from and parallel to the U.S. coastline;
thence southeast 12 miles from and parallel
to the U.S. coastline to a point 12 miles
offshore on the Vancouver FIR boundary; to
lat. 54°32′57″ N., long. 133°11′29″ W.; to lat.
54°00′00″ N., long. 136°00′00″ W.; to lat.
52°43′00″ N., long. 135°00′00″ W.; to lat.
56°45′42″ N., long. 151°45′00″ W.; to the
point of beginning; and that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet MSL
within the area bounded by a line beginning
at lat. 59°33′25″ N., long. 141°03′22″ W.;
thence southeast 12 miles from and parallel
to the U.S. coastline to lat. 58°56′18″ N., long.
138°45′19″ W.; to lat. 58°40′00″ N., long.
139°30′00″ W.; to lat. 59°00′00″ N., long.
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
141°10′00″ W.; to the point of beginning. The
portion within Canada is excluded.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 25,
2006.
Kenneth McElroy,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. 06–898 Filed 1–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 305
Rule Concerning Disclosures
Regarding Energy Consumption and
Water Use of Certain Home Appliances
and Other Products Required Under
the Energy Policy and Conservation
Act (‘‘Appliance Labeling Rule’’)
Federal Trade Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is
amending the Appliance Labeling Rule
to update ranges of comparability for
compact clothes washers, refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers. In
addition, the Commission announces
that ranges of comparability for standard
clothes washers will remain in effect
until further notice. Finally, the
Commission is issuing minor, technical
amendments to update the definition of
medium base compact fluorescent lamp
and to correct a sample heat pump label
in the Rule.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, Attorney, Division
of Enforcement, Federal Trade
Commission, Washington, DC 20580
(202–326–2889); hnewsome@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Appliance Labeling Rule (‘‘Rule’’) was
issued by the Commission in 1979, 44
FR 66466 (Nov. 19, 1979), in response
to a directive in the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act of 1975 (‘‘EPCA’’).1
The Rule covers several categories of
major household appliances including
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers.
I. Background
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with RULES
The Rule requires manufacturers of all
covered appliances to disclose specific
energy consumption or efficiency
information (derived from the DOE test
1 42 U.S.C. 6294. The statute also requires the
Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) to develop test
procedures that measure how much energy the
appliances use, and to determine the representative
average cost a consumer pays for the different types
of energy available.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Jan 30, 2006
Jkt 208001
procedures) at the point of sale in the
form of an ‘‘EnergyGuide’’ label, in fact
sheets (for some appliances), and in
catalogs. The Rule requires
manufacturers to include, on labels and
fact sheets, an energy consumption or
efficiency figure and a ‘‘range of
comparability.’’ This range shows the
highest and lowest energy consumption
or efficiencies for all comparable
appliance models so consumers can
compare the energy consumption or
efficiency of similar models. The Rule
also requires manufacturers to include,
on labels for some products, a secondary
energy usage disclosure in the form of
an estimated annual operating cost
based on a specified DOE national
average cost for the fuel the appliance
uses.
Section 305.8(b) of the Rule requires
manufacturers, after filing an initial
report, to report certain information
annually to the Commission.2 These
reports, which assist the Commission in
preparing the ranges of comparability,
contain the estimated annual energy
consumption or energy efficiency
ratings for the appliances derived from
tests performed pursuant to the DOE test
procedures. Because manufacturers
regularly add new models to their lines,
improve existing models, and
discontinue others, the data base from
which the ranges of comparability are
calculated changes constantly. To keep
the information on labels up-to-date, the
Commission, therefore, publishes new
ranges if the upper or lower limits of the
ranges have changed by more than 15%.
Otherwise, the Commission publishes a
statement that the prior ranges remain
in effect for the next year.
II. 2005 Refrigerator and Clothes
Washer Data
The Commission has analyzed the
annual submissions of data for clothes
washers, refrigerators, refrigeratorfreezers, and freezers. Analysis of the
refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers, and
freezers submissions indicates that the
ranges for these products have changed
significantly.3 Therefore, the
Commission is publishing new ranges of
comparability in these categories.
Today’s publication of the new ranges
for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers also means that, after May
1, 2006, manufacturers of these products
must calculate the operating cost figures
2 Reports for refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers,
and freezers are due August 1. Reports for clothes
washers are due October 1.
3 The Commission’s analysis for refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, and freezers excluded models
with energy consumption figures that do not meet
the current DOE energy conservation standards. See
62 FR 23102 (April 28, 1997).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4983
at the bottom of labels for the products
using the 2005 cost for electricity (9.06
cents per kilowatt-hour) (see 70 FR
32484 (June 3, 2005)).
Analysis of the clothes washer
submissions indicate that there has been
a significant change in the range for
compact clothes washers but no
significant change for standard clothes
washers. Manufacturers should
continue to use the existing range and
energy cost information found in the
Rule for standard clothes washers. The
Commission, however, is amending the
required range of comparability for
compact clothes washers to reflect the
new data.4 The Commission is not
changing the energy cost figures (i.e., the
average national prices for electricity
and natural gas) that manufacturers
must use to calculate estimated
operating costs on compact clothes
washer labels. Manufacturers should
continue to use the 2004 electricity and
natural gas cost figures as currently
required by the Rule for both compact
and standard models. If standard and
compact washer labels employed
different energy cost figures for
calculating operating costs, models with
the identical energy consumption would
bear labels disclosing different annual
operating costs. This could cause
consumer confusion and make it
difficult for consumers to compare the
operating costs of these washer types.
III. Definition of Medium Base Compact
Fluorescent Lamp
The Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPACT of 2005) (Pub. L. 109–58)
amended the definition of ‘‘medium
base compact fluorescent lamp’’ in part
B of title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA) (42 U.S.C.
6291–6309). On October 18, 2005 (70 FR
60407), DOE issued technical
amendments to change, among other
things, the regulatory definition of
‘‘medium base compact fluorescent
lamp’’ to make it consistent with the
amended Act. The Commission is
changing the definition of this term in
its Rule so that it is consistent with
DOE’s rules and the new statutory
definition.
IV. Correction to Prototype Label 5 and
Sample Label 9
The Commission is issuing a
correction to Prototype Label 5 and
Sample Label 9 in the Rule. The word
‘‘cooling,’’ instead of ‘‘heating,’’ was
incorrectly placed in the label’s
depiction of the model’s Heating
Seasonal Performance Factor. In
4 Compact clothes washers account for a small
fraction of the total washer models on the market.
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 31, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4981-4983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2005-22708; Airspace Docket No. 05-AAL-32]
RIN 2120-AA66
Modification of Offshore Airspace Areas: Gulf of Alaska Low and
Control 1487L; AK
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action amends the Gulf of Alaska Low and Control 1487L
Offshore airspace areas in Alaska. Specifically, this action modifies
the Gulf of Alaska Low and Control 1487L airspace areas in the vicinity
of the Yakutat Airport, Yakutat, AK, by lowering the affected
controlled airspace floor to 700 feet mean sea level (MSL) for the Gulf
of Alaska Low, and 1,200 feet MSL for Control 1487L. The FAA is taking
this action to provide additional controlled airspace for the safety of
aircraft executing instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at the
Yakutat Airport.
EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken McElroy, Airspace and Rules,
Office of
[[Page 4982]]
System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267-8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On December 8, 2005, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to modify the Gulf of Alaska Low and
Control 1487L Offshore Control Areas in Alaska (70 FR 72950).
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. No comments were
received.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to modify the Gulf of Alaska Low airspace area, AK, by lowering
the floor to 700 feet MSL in the vicinity of Yakutat Airport, Yakutat,
AK. Additionally, the Control 1487L airspace area, AK, will be lowered
from 5,500 feet MSL to 1,200 feet MSL in the vicinity of Yakutat
Airport. These areas will provide controlled airspace beyond 12 miles
from the shoreline of the United States where there is a requirement to
provide IFR enroute Air Traffic Control services and within which the
United States is applying domestic air traffic control procedures. This
rule establishes controlled airspace sufficient in size to support the
Terminal Arrival Area associated with new IFR operations at Yakutat
Airport, AK. The FAA Instrument Flight Procedures Production and
Maintenance Branch has developed three new standard instrument approach
procedures (SIAP), revised seven SIAPs and revised one departure
procedure for the Yakutat Airport. Additional controlled airspace
extending upward from 700 feet and 1,200 feet above the surface in
international airspace is created by this action. The airspace is
sufficient to support IFR operations at the Yakutat Airport.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
ICAO Considerations
As part of this rule relates to navigable airspace outside the
United States, the notice of this action is submitted in accordance
with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) International
Standards and Recommended Practices.
The application of International Standards and Recommended
Practices by the FAA, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM,
Airspace & Rules, in areas outside United States domestic airspace, is
governed by the Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Specifically, the FAA is governed by Article 12 and Annex 11, which
pertain to the establishment of necessary air navigational facilities
and services to promote the safe, orderly, and expeditious flow of
civil air traffic. The purpose of Article 12 and Annex 11 is to ensure
that civil aircraft operations on international air routes are
performed under uniform conditions.
The International Standards and Recommended Practices in Annex 11
apply to airspace under the jurisdiction of a contracting state,
derived from ICAO. Annex 11 provisions apply when air traffic services
are provided and a contracting state accepts the responsibility of
providing air traffic services over high seas or in airspace of
undetermined sovereignty. A contracting state accepting this
responsibility may apply the International Standards and Recommended
Practices that are consistent with standards and practices utilized in
its domestic jurisdiction.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Convention, state-owned
aircraft are exempt from the Standards and Recommended Practices of
Annex 11. The United States is a contracting state to the Convention.
Article 3(d) of the Convention provides that participating state
aircraft will be operated in international airspace with due regard for
the safety of civil aircraft. Since this action involves, in part, the
designation of navigable airspace outside the United States, the
Administrator has consulted with the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Defense in accordance with the provisions of Executive
Order 10854.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
The Amendment
0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9N, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated September 1, 2005, and effective September 15,
2005, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6007 Offshore Airspace Areas.
* * * * *
Gulf of Alaska Low, AK [Amended]
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet MSL bounded by a
line beginning at a point where the 12-mile offshore limit
intersects long. 144[deg]30[min]00[sec] W.; thence eastward 12 miles
off shore and parallel to the shoreline to lat.
59[deg]10[min]36[sec] N., long. 139[deg]31[min]10[sec] W.; to lat.
59[deg]02[min]49[sec] N., long. 139[deg]47[min]45[sec] W.; to lat.
59[deg]27[min]12[sec] N., long. 140[deg]31[min]10[sec] W.; thence
westward along the south boundary of V-440 to long.
144[deg]30[min]00[sec] W.; thence northward along long.
144[deg]30[min]00[sec] W.; to the point of beginning.
* * * * *
Control 1487L [Amended]
That airspace extending upward from 5,500 feet MSL within the
area bounded by a line beginning at lat. 58[deg]19[min]58[sec] N.,
long. 148[deg]55[min]07[sec] W.; to lat. 59[deg]08[min]34[sec] N.,
long. 147[deg]16[min]06[sec] W.; thence counterclockwise via the arc
of a 149.5-mile radius centered on the Anchorage VOR/DME to the
intersection of the 149.5-mile radius arc and a point 12 miles from
and parallel to the U.S. coastline; thence southeast 12 miles from
and parallel to the U.S. coastline to a point 12 miles offshore on
the Vancouver FIR boundary; to lat. 54[deg]32[min]57[sec] N., long.
133[deg]11[min]29[sec] W.; to lat. 54[deg]00[min]00[sec] N., long.
136[deg]00[min]00[sec] W.; to lat. 52[deg]43[min]00[sec] N., long.
135[deg]00[min]00[sec] W.; to lat. 56[deg]45[min]42[sec] N., long.
151[deg]45[min]00[sec] W.; to the point of beginning; and that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet MSL within the area
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 59[deg]33[min]25[sec] N., long.
141[deg]03[min]22[sec] W.; thence southeast 12 miles from and
parallel to the U.S. coastline to lat. 58[deg]56[min]18[sec] N.,
long. 138[deg]45[min]19[sec] W.; to lat. 58[deg]40[min]00[sec] N.,
long. 139[deg]30[min]00[sec] W.; to lat. 59[deg]00[min]00[sec] N.,
long.
[[Page 4983]]
141[deg]10[min]00[sec] W.; to the point of beginning. The portion
within Canada is excluded.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 25, 2006.
Kenneth McElroy,
Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.
[FR Doc. 06-898 Filed 1-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P