Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico, Visibility, 4543 [06-759]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 18 / Friday, January 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules
promulgated in the NISPOM. DoD, as
the Executive Agent, shall use standards
applicable to agencies as the basis for
the requirements, restrictions, and
safeguards contained in the NISPOM;
however, the NISPOM requirements
may be designed to accommodate as
necessary the unique circumstances of
industry. Any issue pertaining to
deviation of industry requirements in
the NISPOM from the standards
applicable to agencies shall be
addressed through the NISPOM
coordination process.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
§ 2004.22
[202(a)].
Operational responsibilities
15:15 Jan 26, 2006
Jkt 208001
Cost reports [203 (d)].
(a) The Executive Branch departments
and agencies shall provide information
each year to the Director, ISOO, on the
costs within the agency associated with
implementation of the NISP for the
previous year.
(b) The DoD as the Executive Agent
shall develop a cost methodology in
coordination with industry to collect the
costs incurred by contractors of all
Executive Branch departments and
agencies to implement the NISP, and
shall report those costs to the Director,
ISOO, on an annual basis.
§ 2004.24
(a) Designation of Cognizant Security
Authority (CSA). The CSA for a
contractor shall be determined by the
preponderance of classified contract
activity per agreement by the CSAs. The
responsible CSA shall conduct oversight
inspections of contractor security
programs and provide other support
services to contractors as necessary to
ensure compliance with the NISPOM
and that contractors are protecting
classified information as required. DoD,
as Executive Agent, shall serve as the
CSA for all Executive Branch
departments and agencies that are not a
designated CSA. As such, DoD shall:
(1) Provide training to industry to
ensure that industry understands the
responsibilities associated with
protecting classified information.
(2) Validate the need for contractor
access to classified information, shall
establish a system to request personnel
security investigations for contractor
personnel, and shall ensure adequate
funding for investigations of those
contractors under Department of
Defense cognizance.
(3) Maintain a system of eligibility
and access determinations of contractor
personnel.
(b) General Responsibilities. Executive
Branch departments and agencies that
issue contracts requiring industry to
have access to classified information
and are not a designated CSA shall:
(1) Include the Security Requirements
clause, 52.204–2, from the FAR in such
contracts;
(2) Incorporate a Contract Security
Classification Specification (DD 254)
into the contracts in accordance with
the FAR subpart 4.4;
(3) Sign agreements with the
Department of Defense as the Executive
Agent for industrial security services;
and
(4) Ensure applicable department and
agency personnel having NISP
implementation responsibilities are
provided appropriate education and
training.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
§ 2004.23
Definitions.
For the purposes of this part the
following definitions apply:
(a) Cognizant Security Agencies
(CSAs) means the Executive Branch
departments and agencies authorized in
EO 12829, as amended, to establish
industrial security programs: the
Department of Defense, designated as
the Executive Agent; the Department of
Energy; the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission; and the Central
Intelligence Agency.
(b) Contractor means any industrial,
education, commercial, or other entity,
to include licensees or grantees that has
been granted access to classified
information. Contractor does not
include individuals engaged under
personal services contracts.
Dated: December 5, 2005.
J. William Leonard,
Director, Information Security Oversight
Office.
Approved: January 14, 2006.
Allen Weinstein,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. E6–815 Filed 1–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[NM–4–1–5208b; FRL–8025–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico,
Visibility
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision satisfies the New Source
Review (NSR) and monitoring plan
requirements for visibility, otherwise
known as the ‘‘Phase I, Part I Visibility
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4543
SIP.;’’ In addition, this revision includes
the implementation control strategies,
integral vistas protection, and long term
strategies, otherwise known as the
‘‘Phase I, Part II Visibility SIP.’’ Lastly,
EPA is proposing to remove the SIP
disapprovals associated with Phase I,
Parts I and II, and the resultant Federal
Implementation Plans (FIPs).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to
Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Kordzi, Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone
(214) 665–7186; fax number 214–665–
7263; e-mail address
kordzi.joe@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action rule,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Federal Register.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 06–759 Filed 1–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-759]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[NM-4-1-5208b; FRL-8025-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico,
Visibility
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the New Mexico State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision satisfies the New Source
Review (NSR) and monitoring plan requirements for visibility, otherwise
known as the ``Phase I, Part I Visibility SIP.;'' In addition, this
revision includes the implementation control strategies, integral
vistas protection, and long term strategies, otherwise known as the
``Phase I, Part II Visibility SIP.'' Lastly, EPA is proposing to remove
the SIP disapprovals associated with Phase I, Parts I and II, and the
resultant Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 27,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Kordzi, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7186; fax number
214-665-7263; e-mail address kordzi.joe@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 06-759 Filed 1-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P