BNSF Railway Company-Abandonment Exemption-in Walsh County, ND, 4397-4398 [E6-989]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Notices
facilitate notifying consumers in the
event of a recall. Cooper says that if it
was required to notify purchasers, ‘‘the
subject tires could be easily
identified.’’Cooper points out that the
correct tire size is stamped on the
sidewall, and the tires meet all other
requirements of FMVSS No. 109 and 49
CFR 574.5.
NHTSA agrees with Cooper that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. As Cooper points
out, the tires do not have sidewall
markings which provide the correct size
for the user of this information. In
addition, the incorrect marking does not
affect the ability to identify the tires in
the event of recall. Cooper has corrected
the problem.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that the petitioner
has met its burden of persuasion that
the noncompliance described is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Cooper’s petition is
granted and the petitioner is exempted
from the obligation of providing
notification of, and a remedy for, the
noncompliance.
(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8)
Issued on January 20, 2006.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 06–731 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA 2005–23168; Notice 2]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, Grant
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
(Cooper) has determined that certain
tires that it produced in 2005 do not
comply with S4.3(a) of 49 CFR 571.109,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 109, ‘‘New pneumatic
tires’’ and with 49 CFR 574.5, ‘‘Tire
Identification Requirements.’’ Pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h),
Cooper has petitioned for a
determination that this noncompliance
is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety and has filed an appropriate
report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
‘‘Defect and Noncompliance Reports.’’
Notice of receipt of a petition was
published, with a 30-day comment
period, on December 9, 2005 in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 205001
Federal Register (70 FR 73324). NHTSA
received no comments.
Affected are a total of approximately
488 size 225/70R15 tires produced
during the period January 30, 2005
through April 16, 2005. S4.3(a) and Part
574.5(b) require a tire identification
number (TIN) on the tire which includes
a size designation. The noncompliant
tires were molded with the letters ‘‘X5’’
as the size designation. The correct
stamping should have been ‘‘35.’’
Cooper believes that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety and that no
corrective action is warranted. Cooper
states that the purpose of the tire
identification number is to facilitate
notifying consumers in the event of a
recall. Cooper says that if it was
required to notify purchasers, ‘‘the
subject tires could be easily identified.’’
Cooper points out that the correct tire
size appears elsewhere on the tire,
including twice on each sidewall, and
the tires meet all other requirements of
FMVSS No. 109 and 49 CFR 574.5.
NHTSA agrees with Cooper that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. As Cooper points
out, the tires do have sidewall markings
which provide the correct size for the
user of this information. In addition, the
incorrect marking does not affect the
ability to identify the tires in the event
of recall. Cooper has corrected the
problem.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that the petitioner
has met its burden of persuasion that
the noncompliance described is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, Cooper’s petition is
granted and the petitioner is exempted
from the obligation of providing
notification of, and a remedy for, the
noncompliance.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120;
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8)
Issued on: January 20, 2006.
Daniel C. Smith,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E6–959 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–6 (Sub-No. 432X)]
BNSF Railway Company—
Abandonment Exemption—in Walsh
County, ND
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has
filed a notice of exemption under 49
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4397
CFR part 1152 subpart F—Exempt
Abandonments to abandon a 7.12-mile
line of railroad between milepost 144.21
at Grafton, and milepost 137.09, near
Voss, in Walsh County, ND. The line
traverses United States Postal Service
Zip Codes 58237 and 58261.
BNSF has certified that: (1) No local
traffic has moved over the line for at
least 2 years; (2) there is no overhead
traffic on the line that would have to be
rerouted; (3) no formal complaint filed
by a user of rail service on the line (or
by a state or local government entity
acting on behalf of such user) regarding
cessation of service over the line either
is pending with the Surface
Transportation Board or with any U.S.
District Court or has been decided in
favor of complainant within the 2-year
period; and (4) the requirements at 49
CFR 1105.7 (environmental reports), 49
CFR 1105.8 (historic reports), 49 CFR
1105.11 (transmittal letter), 49 CFR
1105.12 (newspaper publication), and
49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to
governmental agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee adversely affected by the
abandonment shall be protected under
Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979). To address whether this
condition adequately protects affected
employees, a petition for partial
revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of
intent to file an offer of financial
assistance (OFA) has been received, this
exemption will be effective on February
25, 2006, unless stayed pending
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do
not involve environmental issues,1
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),2 and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49
CFR 1152.29 must be filed by February
3, 2006. Petitions to reopen or requests
for public use conditions under 49 CFR
1152.28 must be filed by February 15,
2006, with the Surface Transportation
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to BNSF’s
representative: Sidney L. Strickland, Jr.,
1 The Board will grant a stay if an informed
decision on environmental issues (whether raised
by a party or by the Board’s Section of
Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent
investigation) cannot be made before the
exemption’s effective date. See Exemption of Outof-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any
request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible
so that the Board may take appropriate action before
the exemption’s effective date.
2 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which is currently set at $1,200. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(25).
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
4398
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Notices
Sidney Strickland and Associates,
PLLC, 3050 K Street, N.W., Suite 101,
Washington, DC 20007.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
BNSF has filed environmental and
historic reports that address the effects,
if any, of the abandonment on the
environment and historic resources.
SEA will issue an environmental
assessment (EA) by January 31, 2006.
Interested persons may obtain a copy of
the EA by writing to SEA (Room 500,
Surface Transportation Board,
Washington, DC 20423–0001) or by
calling SEA, at (202) 565–1539.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.] Comments on
environmental and historic preservation
matters must be filed within 15 days
after the EA becomes available to the
public.
Environmental, historic preservation,
public use, or trail use/rail banking
conditions will be imposed, where
appropriate, in a subsequent decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR
1152.29(e)(2), BNSF shall file a notice of
consummation with the Board to signify
that it has exercised the authority
granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by
BNSF’s filing of a notice of
consummation by January 26, 2007, and
there are no legal or regulatory barriers
to consummation, the authority to
abandon will automatically expire.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: January 20, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–989 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
Fiscal Service
Surety Companies Acceptable on
Federal Bonds: Amendment—ACSTAR
Insurance Company
Financial Management Service,
Fiscal Service, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 6 to
the Treasury Department Circular 570;
2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005,
at 70 FR 38502.
Jkt 205001
Dated: January 13, 2006.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services
Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 06–713 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–35–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
bond-approving officers may let such
bonds run to expiration and need not
secure new bonds. However, no new
bonds should be accepted from the
Company. In addition, bonds that are
continuous in nature should not be
renewed.
The Circular may be viewed and
downloaded through the Internet at
https://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard
copy may be purchased from the
government Printing Office (GPO),
Subscription Service, Washington, DC,
telephone (202) 512–1800. When
ordering the Circular from GPO, use the
following stock number: 769–004–
05219–0.
Questions concerning this notice may
be directed to the U.S. Department of
the Treasury, Financial Management
Service, Financial Accounting and
Services Division, Surety Bond Branch,
3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01,
Hyattsville, MD 20782.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services
Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 06–714 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–35–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Reporting and Procedures
Regulations
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Fiscal Service
Surety Companies Acceptable on
Federal Bonds: Termination—United
Coastal Insurance Company
Financial Management Service,
Fiscal Service, Department of the
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
16:10 Jan 25, 2006
Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–7102.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
underwriting limitation for ACSTAR
Insurance Company, which was listed
in the Treasury Department Circular
570, published on July 1, 2005, is
hereby amended to read $2,737,000.
Federal bond-approving officers
should annotate their reference copies
of the Treasury Circular 570, 2005
Revision, at 70 FR 38503 to reflect this
change, effective today.
The Circular may be viewed and
downloaded through the Internet https://
www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard copy
may be purchased from the Government
Printing Office (GPO), Subscription
Service, Washington, DC, telephone
(202) 512–1800. When ordering the
Circular from GPO, use the following
stock number: 769–004–0521–0.
Questions concerning this Notice may
be directed to the U.S. Department of
the Treasury, Financial Management
Service, Financial Accounting and
Services Division, Surety Bond Branch,
3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01,
Hyattsville, MD 20782.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to
the Treasury Department Circular 570;
2005 Revision, published July 1, 2005,
at 70 FR 38502.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–7102.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that the Certificate of
Authority issued by the Treasury to the
above named Company under the
United States Code, title 31, Sections
9304–9308, to qualify as an acceptable
surety on Federal bonds is terminated
effective today.
The Company was last listed as an
acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 70
FR 38502 on page 38542, July 1, 2005.
With respect to any bonds currently
in force with above listed company,
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Department of the
Treasury, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (‘‘OFAC’’) within
the Department of the Treasury is
soliciting comments concerning OFAC’s
information collection requirements
contained within OFAC’s Reporting,
Procedures and Penalties Regulations
set forth at 31 CFR part 501.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before March 27, 2006, to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ care of
the Licensing Division, Office of Foreign
Assets Control, Department of the
E:\FR\FM\26JAN1.SGM
26JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4397-4398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-989]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB-6 (Sub-No. 432X)]
BNSF Railway Company--Abandonment Exemption--in Walsh County, ND
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has filed a notice of exemption under
49 CFR part 1152 subpart F--Exempt Abandonments to abandon a 7.12-mile
line of railroad between milepost 144.21 at Grafton, and milepost
137.09, near Voss, in Walsh County, ND. The line traverses United
States Postal Service Zip Codes 58237 and 58261.
BNSF has certified that: (1) No local traffic has moved over the
line for at least 2 years; (2) there is no overhead traffic on the line
that would have to be rerouted; (3) no formal complaint filed by a user
of rail service on the line (or by a state or local government entity
acting on behalf of such user) regarding cessation of service over the
line either is pending with the Surface Transportation Board or with
any U.S. District Court or has been decided in favor of complainant
within the 2-year period; and (4) the requirements at 49 CFR 1105.7
(environmental reports), 49 CFR 1105.8 (historic reports), 49 CFR
1105.11 (transmittal letter), 49 CFR 1105.12 (newspaper publication),
and 49 CFR 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental agencies) have been
met.
As a condition to this exemption, any employee adversely affected
by the abandonment shall be protected under Oregon Short Line R. Co.--
Abandonment--Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To address whether this
condition adequately protects affected employees, a petition for
partial revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of
financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be
effective on February 25, 2006, unless stayed pending reconsideration.
Petitions to stay that do not involve environmental issues,\1\ formal
expressions of intent to file an OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),\2\ and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49 CFR 1152.29 must be filed by
February 3, 2006. Petitions to reopen or requests for public use
conditions under 49 CFR 1152.28 must be filed by February 15, 2006,
with the Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20423-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Board will grant a stay if an informed decision on
environmental issues (whether raised by a party or by the Board's
Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent
investigation) cannot be made before the exemption's effective date.
See Exemption of Out-of-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989).
Any request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible so that
the Board may take appropriate action before the exemption's
effective date.
\2\ Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which is
currently set at $1,200. See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A copy of any petition filed with the Board should be sent to
BNSF's representative: Sidney L. Strickland, Jr.,
[[Page 4398]]
Sidney Strickland and Associates, PLLC, 3050 K Street, N.W., Suite 101,
Washington, DC 20007.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio.
BNSF has filed environmental and historic reports that address the
effects, if any, of the abandonment on the environment and historic
resources. SEA will issue an environmental assessment (EA) by January
31, 2006. Interested persons may obtain a copy of the EA by writing to
SEA (Room 500, Surface Transportation Board, Washington, DC 20423-0001)
or by calling SEA, at (202) 565-1539. [Assistance for the hearing
impaired is available through the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.] Comments on environmental and historic
preservation matters must be filed within 15 days after the EA becomes
available to the public.
Environmental, historic preservation, public use, or trail use/rail
banking conditions will be imposed, where appropriate, in a subsequent
decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR 1152.29(e)(2), BNSF shall file
a notice of consummation with the Board to signify that it has
exercised the authority granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by BNSF's filing of a notice of
consummation by January 26, 2007, and there are no legal or regulatory
barriers to consummation, the authority to abandon will automatically
expire.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http:/
/www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: January 20, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-989 Filed 1-25-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P