Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Rocket Launches from Kodiak Island, AK, 4297-4310 [06-765]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Unfunded Mandates Reform
We have determined and certify
pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that
this rulemaking will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments or
produce a Federal mandate of $100
million or more in any given year.
Therefore, this rule does not constitute
a significant regulatory action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order
12988
In promulgating this rule, we have
determined that these regulations meet
the applicable standards provided in
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
not result in the physical occupancy of
property, the physical invasion of
property, or the regulatory taking of any
property. A takings assessment is not
required.
Federalism Effects
This rule does not have a substantial
direct effect on fiscal capacity, change
the roles or responsibilities of Federal or
State governments, or intrude on State
policy or administration. In accordance
with Executive Order 13132, this
regulation does not have significant
federalism effects, nor does it have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
4297
has no effects on Federally recognized
Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Transportation, Wildlife.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, we amend part 20, subchapter
B, chapter I of Title 50 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 20—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 20
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712; 16 U.S.C.
742a–j; Pub. L. 106–108.
2. Section 20.21 is amended by
revising paragraph (j) to read as follows:
I
Takings
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, this rule, authorized by the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not
have significant takings implications
and does not affect any constitutionally
protected property rights. This rule will
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951) and 512
DM 2, we have determined that this rule
§ 20.21
Approved shot type *
97 bismuth, 3 tin ..............................................
iron and carbon ................................................
any proportion of tungsten, ≥1 iron .................
≥1 iron, any proportion of tungsten, up to 40
nickel.
51.1 tungsten, 44.4 copper, 3.9 tin, 0.6 iron
and 60 tungsten, 35.1 copper, 3.9 tin, 1 iron.
40–76 tungsten, 10–37 iron, 9–16 copper, 5–
7 nickel.
95.9 tungsten, 4.1 polymer ..............................
95.5 tungsten, 4.5 Nylon 6 or 11 .....................
any proportions of tungsten and tin, ≥1 iron ...
any proportions of tungsten, tin, and bismuth.
65 tungsten, 21.8 tin, 10.4 iron, 2.8 nickel ......
*
*
*
*
(j) While possessing loose shot for
muzzle loading or shotshells containing
other than the following approved shot
types.
Percent composition by weight
bismuth-tin ..........................................................
iron (steel) ..........................................................
iron-tungsten .......................................................
iron-tungsten-nickel ............................................
tungsten-bronze ..................................................
tungsten-iron-copper-nickel ................................
tungsten-matrix ...................................................
tungsten-polymer ................................................
tungsten-tin-iron ..................................................
tungsten-tin-bismuth ...........................................
tungsten-tin-iron-nickel .......................................
What hunting methods are illegal?
*
Field testing device **
HOT*SHOT. ***
Magnet or HOT*SHOT.
Magnet or HOT*SHOT.
Magnet or HOT*SHOT. **
Rare Earth Magnet.
HOT*SHOT or Rare Earth Magnet.
HOT*SHOT.
HOT*SHOT.
Magnet or HOT*SHOT.
Rare Earth Magnet.
Magnet.
* Coatings of copper, nickel, tin, zinc, zinc chloride, and zinc chrome on approved nontoxic shot types also are approved.
** The information in the ‘‘Field Testing Device’’ column is strictly informational, not regulatory.
*** The ‘‘HOT*SHOT’’ field testing device is from Stream Systems of Concord, CA.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: January 13, 2006.
Paul Hoffman,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 06–745 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 011011247–6006–03; I.D.
082701E]
RIN 0648–AP62
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Rocket Launches from
Kodiak Island, AK
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon application from
the Alaska Aerospace Development
Corporation (AADC), is issuing
regulations to govern the unintentional
takings of small numbers of marine
mammals incidental to rocket launches
from the Kodiak Launch Complex (KLC)
on Kodiak Island, AK. Issuance of
regulations is required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) when
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary),
after notice and opportunity for
comment, finds, as here, that such takes
will have a negligible impact on the
species and stocks of marine mammals
and will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on their availability for
subsistence uses. These regulations do
not authorize AADC’s rocket launch
activities, as such authorization is not
within the jurisdiction of the Secretary.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4298
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Rather, these regulations govern the
issuance of ‘‘Letters of Authorization’’
(LOAs) for the unintentional incidental
take of marine mammals in connection
with this activity and prescribe methods
of taking and other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on
marine mammal species and their
habitat, and on the availability of the
species for subsistence uses. In addition,
NMFS incorporates reporting and
monitoring requirements.
DATES: Effective from February 27, 2006
through February 28, 2011.
A copy of the AADC application
which contains a list of the references
used in this document may be obtained
by writing to Steve Leathery, Division of
Permits, Conservation, and Education,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3226 or by telephoning the
contact listed here (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). The NMFS
Administrative Record will be
maintained at the above address.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimate or any other aspect of the
collection of information requirement
contained in this proposed rule should
be sent to NMFS via the means stated
above, and to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB),
Attention: NOAA Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503,
DavidlRustker@eap.omb.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie
Harrison, (301) 713–2289 ext 166, or
Brad Smith, (907) 271–3023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA(16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs the Secretary
to allow, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional taking of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage
in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and regulations are issued.
Authorization may be granted for
periods of 5 years or less if the Secretary
finds that the total taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and regulations are prescribed setting
forth the permissible methods of taking,
other means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on the
affected species or stocks and their
habitats, and the requirements
pertaining to the monitoring and
reporting of such taking.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Except with respect to categories of
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On July 26, 2001, NMFS received an
application from the AADC under
section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA for
authorization to take, by harassment,
Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)
incidental to rocket launches from KLC
on Kodiak Island, Alaska. A proposed
rule was published on October 29, 2004
(69 FR 63114). Comments on the
proposed rule received from the Marine
Mammal Commission (MMC)
recommended NMFS consider also
authorizing take of Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina richardsi), as they are
also found in the vicinity of KLC. After
consulting with AADC and reanalyzing
the distribution and habits of harbor
seals in the area, NMFS has included
take of harbor seals in the final rule.
These regulations will allow NMFS to
issue annual Letters Of Authorization
(LOAs) to the AADC. A full description
of the operations is contained in the
AADC application (AADC, 2001) which
is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES) or at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/protlres/PR2/
SmalllTake/
smalltakelinfo.htm#applications.
The KLC is a commercial rocket
launch complex owned and operated by
the State of Alaska through the AADC.
Located wholly on state-owned lands,
KLC occupies 43 acres (0.2 km2) within
a 3,100 acre (12.6 km2) parcel on the
eastern side of Kodiak Island on the
Narrow Cape peninsula. The KLC was
designed to accommodate a variety of
small, solid rockets including such
vehicles as the Minuteman II, Taurus,
Conestoga, and Athena (Lockheed
Martin Launch Vehicle). The largest
vehicle that can be launched from KLC
is the Athena–2 (Lockheed Martin
Vehicle–2).
Launch operations at the KLC are
authorized under license from the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
Office of Associate Administrator for
Commercial Space Transportation
(AST), in accordance with the facility’s
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
stipulations in the EA’s Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) (see 61 FR
32884, June 25, 1996). These
stipulations included a requirement to
develop a Natural Resource
Management Plan (NRMP) to address
monitoring and mitigation activities for
protected species in the area. This plan
was developed in coordination with
NMFS utilizing comparison of
anticipated sound pressure levels from
rocket motors to be launched from the
KLC with documented marine mammal
disturbance responses to such noise.
Measurement of Airborne Sound Levels
The following section is provided to
facilitate an understanding of airborne
and impulsive noise characteristics.
Amplitude is a measure of the pressure
of a sound wave that is usually
expressed on a logarithmic scale with
units of sound level or intensity called
the decibel (dB). Sound pressure level
(SPL) is described in units of dB re
micro-Pascal (micro-Pa); for energy, the
sound energy level (SEL), a measure of
the cumulative energy in a noise event,
is described in terms of dB re microPa2–second (dB re micro-Pa2–s); and
frequency, often referred to as pitch, is
described in units of cycles per second
or Hertz (Hz). In other words, SEL is the
squared instantaneous sound pressure
over a specified time interval, where the
sound pressure is averaged over 5
percent to 95 percent of the duration of
the sound.
For airborne noise measurements the
convention is to use 20 micro-Pa as the
reference pressure, which is the
approximate threshold for onset of
human hearing and is 26 dB above the
underwater sound pressure reference of
1 micro-Pa and is. However, the
conversion from air to water intensities
is more involved than this and is
beyond the scope of this document.
NMFS recommends interested readers
review NOAA’s tutorial on this issue:
https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/
acoustics/tutorial/tutorial.html.
Airborne sounds are also often
expressed as broadband A-weighted
(dBA) or C-weighted (dBC) sound levels.
When frequency levels are made to
correspond to human hearing, they are
referred to as being A-weighted or Afiltered. With A-weighting, sound
energy at frequencies below 1 kHz and
above 6 kHz are de-emphasized and
approximates the human ear’s response
to sounds below 55 dB. C-weighting is
often used in the analysis of high-
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
amplitude noises like explosions, and
corresponds to the relative response to
the human ear to sound levels above 85
dB. C-weighting de-emphasizes ear
frequency components of less than
about 50 Hz. C-weight scaling is also
useful for analyses of sounds having
predominantly low-frequency sounds,
such as sonic booms. For continuous
noise like rocket launches, the
important variables relevant to assessing
auditory impacts or behavioral
responses are intensity, frequency
spectrum, and duration. In this
document, sound levels have been
provided with A-weighting.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Description of the Activity
To date there have been eight rocket
launches from the KLC; however, the
KLC facility is licensed to launch up to
nine rockets per year. The first two
launches used composite vehicles built
from several stages taken from a
decommissioned USAF Minuteman II
launch vehicle, and were part of the
U.S. Air Force (USAF) atmospheric
interceptor technology (ait) program.
The third and the sixth launches (March
2001 and April 2002) were part of the
USAF Quick Reaction Launch Vehicle
(QRLV) program, and comprised of
single stage M–56 motors taken from a
decommissioned USAF Minuteman II
launch vehicle. The fourth launch
(September 2001) was a commercial
Lockheed/Martin Athena rocket, which
is the largest vehicle to be launched
from KLC, and it placed four satellites
into polar orbit. The fifth, seventh, and
eighth launches (November 2001,
December 2004, and February 2005)
were Department of Defense (DoD)
Strategic Target System (STARS)
vehicles and consisted of the first two
stages of a decommissioned A–3 missile
and an Orbis third stage.
Launches from the KLC are expected
to be at high inclination with launch
azimuths ranging from 125 to 225
degrees in direction (AADC and AST,
1996). At the easternmost azimuth,
launch vehicle paths would pass over
the eastern edge of Ugak Island; at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
westernmost azimuth, the vehicle
would pass along the southeastern edge
of the Kodiak Archipelago.
Approximately 70 seconds after launch,
a typical launch vehicle would be more
than 8 miles (12.5 km) high. Spent firststage rocket motors and fuel casings
would impact the ocean’s surface from
11 to 314 n-mi (20 to 582 km)
downrange, depending on the launch
vehicle (AADC and AST, 1996). Rocket
motor sonic booms are predicted to
reach the ocean surface over 20 miles
(32 km) downrange beyond the outer
continental shelf over deep ocean.
Launch operations are a major source
of noise on Kodiak Island, as the
operation of launch vehicle engines
produces significant sound levels.
Generally, four types of noise occur
during a launch. They are: (1)
Combustion noise from launch vehicle
chambers; (2) jet noise generated by the
interaction of the exhaust jet and the
atmosphere; (3) combustion noise from
the post-burning of combustion
products; and (4) sonic booms. The
principal objective of the KLC rocket
motor noise monitoring task within the
NRMP was to measure A-weighted
Sound Energy Levels (ASELs) at the
Ugak Island Steller sea lion haulout. A
secondary objective was to monitor
sound levels on Narrow Cape close to
bald eagle and/or Steller’s eider nests
when present. ASELs were successfully
recorded for the first four and the
seventh launches from KLC at the Ugak
Island Steller sea lion haulout and on
Narrow Cape by the University of
Alaska Anchorage’s Environment and
Natural Resources Institute (ENRI). The
Ugak Island haulout is located
approximately 2 miles (3.2 km) from
Narrow Cape and about 3.5 miles (5.6
km) from the KLC launch pad on a
narrow sand spit on the north side of
the Island. The data gathered were
weighted toward frequencies that
humans are more sensitive to (1–6 kHz,
A-weighted) and showed a wide
variation in sound pressures among
rocket motors, with the highest levels
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4299
being associated with the largest launch
vehicle flown. Variations in the KLC
sound pressure record are likely due to
such variables as engine size, engine
bell shape, and local atmospheric
conditions. Summaries of the findings
for each of the measured rocket
launches to date are described below. A
complete description of the proposed
rocket launches from KLC may be found
in AADC’s application, which may be
viewed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
protlres/PR2/SmalllTake/
smalltakelinfo.htm#applications. This
information is incorporated into this
document by reference.
ait–1
The first launch from KLC occurred in
November 1998, and was the first of the
USAF ait program. Sound
measurements from the ait–1 launch
were collected using two sound level
monitors (SLMs) that were deployed 26
hours before launch on Ugak Island at
the base of the spit used as a haulout by
Steller sea lions. The SLMs were set to
highlight sounds exceeding 65 dB,
which was done after checking real-time
sound levels in the field at each site
prior to setting them to record data. If
the exceedance levels were set too low,
the SLMs would be deluged with data,
and if they were set too high the SLMs
would miss the event of interest. A
digital audio tape (DAT) recorder was
used to provide redundancy in
recording noise frequencies and was
placed about 0.75 mi (1.2 km) from the
KLC launch pad.
Recorded sound pressure levels
(SPLs) of rocket motor noise for the ait–
1 at the Ugak Island haulout site were
78.2 dB re 20 microPa with a peak level
of 97 dB (Table 1). The associated ASEL
at the Ugak Island haulout was 88.4 dB
re 20 microPa2 s. In addition, the ASEL
at the nearest location measured by the
DAT recorder was 110 dB for a duration
of 59 seconds. The bulk of the sound
energy was at low frequencies and
generally less than 4000 Hz. Most of the
energy was from 100 to 500 Hz.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Of the eight noise events recorded
above 65 dB at Ugak Island, ENRI
determined that two are attributable to
helicopter noise and one to the firing of
the ait–1 rocket motor. Sounds at the
Ugak Island site were above 65 dB for
a total of 33 seconds at the time the
rocket motor was firing. Due to the
isolation of this site, the remainder of
the events are most likely attributable to
surf or wind action.
rocket noise; none coincides with a
stampede of Steller sea lions off the
Ugak Island haulout 3.5 hours previous
to the rocket launch. Sounds at the Ugak
Island site were above 70 dB for a total
of 30 seconds at the time the rocket
motor was firing. Natural background
noise levels above 70 dB were almost
nonexistent during this launch.
ait–2
USAF launched a second rocket from
KLC on September 15, 1999. Based on
experience from the first launch, ENRI
set the SLMs to highlight sounds
exceeding 70 dB and deployed them
about 19 hours before the launch. Sound
pressures at Ugak Island were slightly
higher for the second launch than for
the first launch. Recorded maximum
SPLs of rocket motor noise for the ait–
2 at the Ugak Island haulout site were
81.5 dB, with a peak level of 101.5 dB,
and a corresponding SEL of 92.2 dB.
The bulk of the sound energy was at low
frequencies and generally less than 2500
Hz. Most of the energy was from 25 to
1000 Hz.
There were 15 noise events above 70
dB within the 19 hours of recording at
Ugak Island, all of which can be
attributed to helicopter, airplane, or
On March 22, 2001, the USAF
conducted the third launch from KLC.
SLMs set to highlight sounds exceeding
70 dB at the base of the Ugak Island sea
lion haulout were again used by ENRI
to record sound frequency and intensity,
and were deployed 22 hours before the
launch. The recorded sound levels at
Ugak Island were significantly lower for
the QRLV–1 launch than for either of
the ait launches. This is likely due to
the vehicle being smaller, and possibly
to a different trajectory and local
atmospheric condition. Recorded
maximum SPLs resulting from QRLV
rocket motor noise at the Ugak Island
haulout site were 73.3 dB, with a peak
level of 87.2 dB, and a corresponding
SEL of 80.3 dB. The bulk of the sound
energy was at low frequencies and
generally less than 2500 Hz. Most of the
energy was from 16 to 2000 Hz.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
QRLV–1
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
There were 17 noise events above 70
dB at Ugak Island. With the exception
of the rocket launch, all can be related
to helicopter noise. Sounds at the Ugak
Island site were above 70 dB for a total
of 10.9 seconds at the time the rocket
motor was firing. Natural background
noise levels above 70 dB were almost
nonexistent during this launch. Rocket
noise measurements for the QRLV–2
rocket launch on April 24, 2002, the
sixth rocket launched from KLC, were
not recorded, though most likely they
would be similar to those measured
during the first QRLV launch.
Athena
The fourth launch from KLC occurred
on September 29, 2001, and involved a
commercial Lockheed/Martin Athena,
which is the largest vehicle to be
launched from KLC. SLMs were again
set to highlight sounds exceeding 70 dB
and were deployed by ENRI at the Ugak
Island haulout four hours before the
launch. The recorded sound levels at
Ugak Island were significantly higher
for the Athena launch than for previous
launches, which is likely due to the size
of the vehicle. Recorded maximum SPLs
resulting from Athena rocket motor
noise at the Ugak Island haulout site
were 90.8 dB, with a peak level of 115.9
dB, and a corresponding SEL of 101.4
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
ER26JA06.000
4300
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
dB. The bulk of the sound energy was
at low frequencies and generally less
than 2000 Hz.
There were three exceedance events
above 70 dB at Ugak Island and Narrow
Cape within the four hours of recording,
two of which can be attributed to
helicopter noise and the other to the
rocket launch. Sounds at the Ugak
Island site were above 70 dB for 49.6
seconds at the time the rocket motor
was firing. Natural background noise
levels above 70 dB were nonexistent
during this launch.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
STARS
On November 9, 2001, the Department
of Defense launched a STARS vehicle
from KLC; however, the rocket was
deliberately destroyed over open ocean
almost immediately because it lost
communication with KLC. The STARS
program provides ballistic missile
targets to test various sensors and
ground-based interceptors. STARS
vehicles will include first- and secondstage Polaris A3 boosters and a thirdstage Orbus–1 booster. The range of this
system is 620 to 3,418 miles (998 to
5500 km).
The seventh launch from KLC, of the
STARS IFT 13C, occurred on December
14, 2004. SLMs were set to highlight
sounds exceeding 70 dB and were
deployed by ENRI only at Narrow Cape
(because sea lions were not present at
Ugak Island) eight hours before the
launch. Narrow Cape is significantly
closer to the launch site than Ugak
Island. The recorded sound levels at
Narrow Cape were higher for this
launch than for previous launches,
which is likely due to a different
trajectory and local atmospheric
conditions. Recorded maximum SPLs
resulting from rocket motor noise at
Narrow Cape were 105.2 dB, with a
peak level of 128.8 dB, and a
corresponding SEL of 114.3 dB. The
bulk of the sound energy was at low
frequencies and generally less than 2000
Hz. There were over three hundred
exceedance events above 70 dB at
Narrow Cape within the eighteen hours
of recording, two of which can be
attributed to helicopter noise and the
other to the rocket launch. With the
exception of helicopter noise and the
rocket launch, all exceedances at or just
above 70 dB can be connected to
weather-related noise (wind and rain).
Rocket noise measurements for the
STARS IFT 14 rocket launch on
February 13, 2005, the eighth rocket
launched from KLC, were not recorded,
though most likely they would be
similar to those measured during the
STAR IFT 13C launch.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Comments and Responses
On October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63114),
NMFS published a notice of proposed
rulemaking on AADC’s request to take
marine mammals incidental to rocket
launches at KLC and requested
comments, information and suggestions
concerning the request. During the 45–
day public comment period, NMFS
received comments from three members
of the public and the MMC. The MMC
supports NMFS’ intent to implement
incidental take regulations for the
AADC’s activities at KLC provided that
the mitigation and monitoring activities
described in the AADC application for
regulations are incorporated into the
proposal.
Comment 1: The MMC noted that
harbor seals and other marine mammals
occur in the vicinity of KLC and
recommended that NMFS consider
providing additional coverage to the
applicant by authorizing take of harbor
seals and other marine mammals to
reduce the possibility that the applicant
may engage in an impermissible taking.
Response: After reviewing available
information regarding the abundance,
distribution, and behavior of marine
mammals around KLC and consulting
with AADC, NMFS has included
authorization for the take of harbor seals
in this final rule. NMFS determined,
however, that no other marine mammals
were likely to be taken by the rocket
launches, and, therefore, AADC has not
been authorized for the take of any other
marine mammal species.
Comment 2: The MMC recommended
that AADC contact the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) to determine
if authorization for the incidental taking
of small numbers of sea otters is needed.
Response: AADC is consulting with
the USFWS regarding potential take of
sea otters.
Comment 3: The MMC further
recommended that the proposed
monitoring program be expanded to
determine the effects on harbor seals,
sea otters, and other marine mammal
species to determine if authorizations
for these species are needed or, if
authorization to take these species is
provided, to verify that the impacts on
the affected stocks are negligible.
Response: As take of harbor seals is
authorized under this rule,
comprehensive requirements for the
monitoring of harbor seals are now
included. Additionally, AADC is
required to report sightings of any
marine mammals seen during aerial
surveys or on videotapes.
Comment 4: One commenter
expressed strong objections to the rocket
launch facility and asserted that it was
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4301
damaging to the ecosystem and a waste
of money.
Response: These regulations do not
authorize AADC’s rocket launch
activities, because such authorization is
not within the jurisdiction of the
Secretary. Rather, these regulations
authorize the unintentional incidental
take of marine mammals in connection
with this activity and prescribe methods
of taking and other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on
marine mammal species and their
habitat, and on the availability of the
species for subsistence uses. Thus, the
comment is outside of the scope of this
rulemaking.
Comment 5: Another commenter also
objected forcefully to the project (see
response to Comment 4, above) and
further asserted that there is no reason
to allow this killing of marine mammals.
This commenter also expressed doubt in
the accuracy of the measured noise
levels at the site.
Response: Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) states
that the Secretary shall allow the
incidental, but not intentional taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and
regulations are issued. NMFS has
determined that this activity will take
only small numbers of marine
mammals, that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stocks, and that the activity will not
have an unmitigable adverse effect on
the availablility of the species or stock
for subsistence uses. NMFS has also set
forth permissible methods of taking,
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse effect on the species or stock,
and requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
Therefore, NMFS has promulgated these
regulations and will issue the
authorization.
The sound measurements reported
from Ugak Island are similar in level to
those reported at other launch sites. If
information were provided to NMFS
that suggested AADC’s sound
measurements were incorrect, NMFS
would investigate. The rule includes the
following requirement: ‘‘In coordination
and compliance with the Alaska
Aerospace Development Corporation,
the National Marine Fisheries Service
may place an observer on Kodiak or
Ugak Islands for any marine mammal
monitoring activity prior to, during, or
after a missile launch to monitor
impacts on marine mammals, provided
observers are not within the calculated
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4302
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
documents and the application for
further information on these species.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals Affected by the Activity
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
danger zone of the rocket’s flight path
during a launch.’’
Steller Sea Lions
The Steller sea lion is described by
two stocks - those west of 144° W. long.
listed as endangered under the ESA, and
the eastern stock listed as threatened
under the ESA. Sea lions hauled out on
Ugak Island, the northern spit of which
is designated as critical habitat for this
species, are of the western stock. The
most recent comprehensive estimate
(pups and non-pups) of Steller sea lion
abundance in Alaska is based on aerial
surveys of non-pups in June 2002 and
ground based pup counts in June and
early July of 2001 and 2002. Data from
these surveys represents actual counts at
all major rookeries and haulouts. The
best available minimum population
estimate for the western stock of Steller
sea lions is the sum of the total number
of non-pups counted in 2002 (26,602)
and the number of pups counted in
2001 and 2002 (9,211), which is 34,779
(Angliss and Lodge, 2004). This is
considered a minimum estimate because
it has not been corrected to account for
animals which were at sea during the
surveys. Though non-pup numbers
increased 5.5–13.7 percent from 2000–
2002, the 2002 count was still 5.4
percent below the 1998 count and 36.7
percent below the 1990 count and the
long-term, average decline for 1990–02
is 4.3 percent per year (Angliss and
Lodge, 2004).
On Ugak Island sea lions haul out
primarily on the northern-most sand
spit of the island, but also less
frequently on the east/south side of the
island. These haulouts are occupied
primarily from late June to early
October. Opportunistic counts of Steller
sea lions conducted at Ugak Island
every year since 1993 indicate a
maximum of over 350 animals in the fall
of 1997 and a steady decrease in
numbers to less than 40 since 2001
(Kate Wynne, pers. comm, 2005). Two
of the 8 launches have occurred during
times when sea lions are typically
present, during September of 1999, 60–
70 sea lions were seen, and during
September of 2001, no sea lions were
present on the days before and after the
launch.
The KLC is located on the southeast
facing tip of a small peninsula on the
eastern side of Kodiak Island. The
rocket launch site is approximately one
mile (1.6 km) from the southeast shore
(Narrow Cape). The primary KLC
environmental monitoring study area,
and area of anticipated effects, was set
in September 1996 at a meeting between
AADC and representatives of the
USFWS, NMFS, the FAA, and ENRI.
The area was chosen based on modeled
ASELs and includes the lands and
waters within a 6–mile (9.7–km) radius
extending out from the KLC launchpad.
The only marine mammal haulouts
within this area are on Ugak Island.
Ugak Island is a triangular-shaped
island located about 3.5 miles (5.6 km)
southeast of the launch site. The north
side of Ugak island culminates in a
sandy spit on the west end where most
of the sea lions haul out, though some
also haul out at the southern tip of the
island. The southeastern facing side of
the island, where most of the harbor
seals haul out, is very rocky, backed by
300–ft (91–km) cliffs (or higher), and is
subject to very strong wave action. The
west side of the island is steeper than
the north side, but not as steep as the
east, but does not appear to be used
much by either pinniped.
Narrow Cape, Ugak Island, and the
adjacent waters within the primary KLC
study area provide habitat for sea otters,
harbor seals, Steller sea lions (listed as
endangered), gray whales, humpback
whales (listed as endangered), northern
fur seals, northern right whales, and
minke whales. Harbor seals and sea
otters are common year-round, as are
killer whales, Dall’s porpoise, and
harbor porpoise. Other species of
cetaceans that may occur in the area,
such as Pacific white-sided dolphins,
Risso’s dolphins, northern right whale
dolphins, pilot whales, Cuvier’s beaked
whales, Baird’s beaked whale,
Stegneger’s beaked whale, sperm
whales, fin whales, sei whales and blue
whales are rare as they are primarily
pelagic (ENRI, 1995–98). General
information on harbor seals and other
marine mammal species can be found in
Angliss and Lodge (2004), which are
available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/protlres/PR2/
StocklAssessmentlProgram/
sars.html. Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) are
managed by the USFWS. Information on
this species may be found at
www.fws.gov. Please refer to those
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Pacific Harbor Seals
Harbor seals live in the Pacific Ocean
from Baja California in Mexico
northward to the Aleutian Islands of
Alaska. The population is not listed as
‘‘endangered’’ or ‘‘threatened’’ under the
ESA; nor is this species listed as
‘‘depleted’’ or as a ‘‘strategic stock’’
under the MMPA. Harbor seals are
primarily non-migratory and the seals
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
around KLC are considered part of the
Gulf of Alaska stock, which occurs from
Cape Suckling to Unimak Pass,
including animals throughout the
Aleutian Islands. The most recent
comprehensive aerial survey of harbor
seals in Alaska were conducted in 1994
and 1996. When a correction factor is
used to account for animals that were in
the water during the counts, a minimum
population estimate of this stock of
harbor seals is 28,917 (Angliss and
Lodge, 2004). The Kodiak Island
population is estimated to have
increased 7.2 percent annually from
1992–1996 (Angliss and Lodge, 2004)
and survey data from 1992–2004 shows
an even steeper increase at Ugak Island
(Wynne, per. Comm., 2005), though
numbers throughout the Gulf of Alaska
are still lower than they were in the
1970s and 1980s.
Harbor seals are present on Ugak
Island year round. They are found
primarily on the east/south side of the
island, backed by high, steep cliffs, but
they also sometimes haul out on the
north side of the island and on the rock
croppings on the north and east sides of
the island. Harbor seal pupping occurs
on both Ugak between the middle of
May and June. Yearly harbor seal counts
at Ugak Island taken in August since
1992 show a steady increase from
approximately 200 animals in 1992 to
over 900 in 2004 (Wynne, pers. Comm.,
2005). Surveys conducted in 1993 and
1994 found 88 and 96 harbor seal pups,
respectively (AADC 1996).
Northern Fur Seals
The northern fur seal (Callorhinus
ursinus) occurs offshore of the KLC site
near the continental shelf break from
January through April. Because of the
distance from the launch site and the
fact that they will be swimming through
and not stopping (see Cetaceans, below),
NMFS believes it unlikely that fur seals
will be affected by the launch noise and
they will not be addressed further.
Cetaceans
As noted, several species of cetaceans
occupy the waters around KLC.
However, airborne noise is generally
reflected at the sea surface outside of a
26° cone extending down from an
airborne source (Richardson et al.,
1995). Submerged animals would have
to be directly under the noise sources
before they could hear it, and,
approximately 70 seconds after launch,
a typical launch vehicle would be more
than 8 miles (12.9 km) high. Underwater
acoustic transmissions are complex, and
affected by the level and frequency of
noise, sea state and other surface
conditions, and water depth. Given the
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
specific area, within a specific short
time that a cetacean would need to be
traveling through surface/or close to
surface water to be exposed to rocket
noise and the measured rocket sound
levels and the attenuation that would
occur before the noise reached deeper
waters, NMFS believes it unlikely that
any cetaceans will be impacted by the
rocket noise.
Potential Effects of Rocket Launches on
Marine Mammals
As outlined in several previous NMFS
documents, the effects of noise on
marine mammals are highly variable,
and can be categorized as follows (based
on Richardson et al., 1995):
(1) The noise may be too weak to be
heard at the location of the pinniped
(i.e., lower than the prevailing ambient
noise level, the hearing threshold of the
animal at relevant frequencies, or both);
(2) The noise may be audible but not
strong enough to elicit any overt
behavioral response;
(3) The noise may elicit reactions of
variable conspicuousness and variable
relevance to the well being of the
pinniped; these can range from
temporary alert responses to active
avoidance reactions such as stampedes
into the sea from terrestrial haulout
sites;
(4) Upon repeated exposure,
pinnipeds may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation), or
disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are
highly variable in characteristics,
infrequent and unpredictable in
occurrence (as are vehicle launches),
and associated with situations that the
pinniped perceives as a threat;
(5) Any anthropogenic noise that is
strong enough to be heard has the
potential to reduce (mask) the ability of
pinnipeds to hear natural sounds at
similar frequencies, including calls from
conspecifics, and environmental sounds
such as surf noise;
(6) If mammals remain in an area
because it is important for feeding,
breeding or some other biologically
important purpose even though there is
chronic exposure to noise, it is possible
that there could be noise-induced
physiological stress; this might (in turn)
have negative effects on the well-being
or reproduction of the animals involved;
and
(7) Very strong sounds have the
potential to cause temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing
sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received
sound levels must far exceed the
animal’s hearing threshold for there to
be any temporary threshold shift (TTS).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
For transient sounds, the sound level
necessary to cause TTS is inversely
related to the duration of the sound.
Received sound levels must be even
higher for there to be risk of permanent
hearing impairment. In addition, intense
acoustic or explosive events may cause
trauma to tissues associated with organs
vital for hearing, sound production,
respiration, and other functions. This
trauma may include minor to severe
hemorrhage.
Solid rocket boosters from KLC
launches will fall into the ocean away
from any known or potential haul-out
sites and do not pose any measurable
threat to marine mammals. Launch
noise is expected to occur over the
coastal habitats of Narrow Cape and
Ugak Island during every launch, while
sonic booms will occur approximately
40 nm (74 km) downrange over open
ocean, beyond the outer continental
shelf, and are unlikely to affect marine
mammals. Airborne launch sounds will
mostly reflect or refract from the water
surface and, except for sounds within a
diameter of approximately 26 degrees
directly below the launch vehicle, will
not penetrate into the water column.
The sounds that do penetrate will not
persist in the water for more than a few
seconds.
The primary sea lion haulout on Ugak
Island is a spit facing KLC, and animals
at this location would likely hear a
rocket launch. Steller sea lions generally
occupy this haulout from late summer
to the early fall post-breeding period
(late June to early October), historically
by up to several hundred sea lions.
Small numbers of harbor seals may haul
out on the eastern end of the shoreline
that extends from the spit. Harbor seals
and, less frequently sea lions, also haul
out on the southeast side of Ugak Island,
but this area is sheltered from direct
sight of and sound from KLC by a 300–
ft (91.4–m) island cliff and, because it
receives heavy surf, it already has high
ambient noise levels. Because
background ambient noise often
interferes with or masks the ability of an
animal to detect a sound even when that
sound is above its absolute hearing
threshold (Richardson et al., 1995), it
seems unlikely that animals hauled out
at this location would hear noise
associated with rocket launches from
KLC.
Past Monitoring Results at KLC
ENRI was tasked under contract to the
AADC to conduct environmental
monitoring studies for rocket launches
from KLC. In addition to collecting
rocket noise data on the northern spit of
Ugak Island, ENRI conducted aerial
surveys over and collected real-time
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4303
video footage at the seasonally occupied
northern spit haulout site in
conjunction with the three KLC
launches when Steller sea lions might
have been present at the haulout: ait–1
on November 5, 1998; ait–2 on
September 15, 1999; and Athena on
September 29, 2001. The only time
Steller sea lions were observed
occupying the haulout was during the
ait–2 launch monitoring period. Sixty to
seventy animals were on the haulout
about 5 hours pre-launch. Due to below
freezing temperatures, the video system
shut off about 4 hours prior to the ait–
2 launch. The video data show Steller
sea lions fighting or sleeping on the
haulout, and then suddenly stampeding
into the water and milling about
immediately offshore. The cause of the
stampede is not apparent in the video
and no stimulus could be linked to the
response (from the noise recordings or
otherwise). When, or if, any of the
Steller sea lions returned to the haulout
before the ait–2 launch is unknown.
Although sea lions may have returned to
the rocks and fled the haulout again as
a result of rocket noise, a clear-cut
stimulus response of sea lion behavior
to rocket noise cannot be postulated
without video data from the time of the
launch. Approximately 1 hour after the
rocket was launched, no sea lions were
seen hauled out and 50 to 60 sea lions
were observed in the water immediately
offshore. The day after the launch, 60 to
70 animals were seen hauled out at the
same spot. Some of these animals could
be the same ones that were flushed from
the haulout the day before though they
could also be different animals. Though
sea lions have been shown to acclimate
to disturbance from rocket launches at
other spaceports (Thorson and Francine,
1999), it is unlikely that this is the case
at KLC considering the infrequency of
launches. Alternatively, approximately
280 harbor seals were seen at two
locations on the east side of the island
(next to the 300–ft (91–m) cliffs) during
the aerial survey flown 5 hours prelaunch. During the one hour postlaunch aerial overflight, the same
number of harbor seals were hauled out
at the same locations, which would
suggest that they did not flush into the
water, which would further suggest that
the sound was blocked or masked by the
high cliffs and high ambient noise on
that side of the island. Though it is
possible that the harbor seals were
flushed into the water and then quickly
hauled out again before the post-flight
aerial survey, it seems unlikely
considering that harbor seals are
typically significantly more sensitive to
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4304
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
noise than sea lions and the sea lions
were still in the water.
Unlike at the ait–2 launch discussed
above, no Steller sea lions were present
at the Ugak Island haulout during the
ait–1 and Athena launches and it was
not possible to relate any behavioral
responses to the recorded noise levels.
Harbor seals were present at the other
two launches, but monitoring was not
required and the surveys were not
conducted immediately before and after
the launch and could not establish a
stimulus response to the rocket launch.
For all launches, however, launch
noises recorded at the haulout site were
within the audible ranges of pinnipeds
(Richardson et al., 1995) and both
Steller sea lions and harbor seals would
have heard them had they been present.
Further, recorded sound pressures were
at, and sometimes above, levels known
to occasionally induce startle responses
in pinnipeds (Richardson et al., 1995).
Rocket launches will present Steller sea
lions and harbor seals with novel visual
and possibly tactile stimuli as well as
unusually loud sounds and bright lights
from the burning rocket and white
exhaust flume.
Steller Sea Lions
The behavioral data record for Steller
sea lions is small throughout the North
Pacific range and typically is focused on
reproductive behaviors. In general,
studies have shown that responses of
pinnipeds on beaches to acoustic
disturbance arising from rocket and
target missile launches are highly
variable. This variability may be due to
many factors, including species, age
class, and time of year. Porter (1997)
observed Steller sea lions fleeing into
the water for a wide variety of reasons
such as helicopter overflights, bird
flybys, and the presence of nearby
humans. He also noted sea lions
stampedes into the water that could not
be correlated with any observed
stimulus. There is also evidence that
both time of day and temperature alter
the probability of entry into the water
(animals are more likely to enter the
water when already overheated)
(Bowles, 2000). Steller sea lions have
been seen to mill about just offshore
with their heads up in a heightened
state of watchfulness (Porter, 1997) and
remain close to the haulout until they
sense it is safe to go back ashore
(Lockheed Martin Environmental
Services, 1999).
Noise generated from aircraft and
helicopter activities associated with the
launches may provide a potential
secondary source of incidental
harassment, and the physical presence
of aircraft or biologists could also lead
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
to non-acoustic effects on marine
mammals involving visual or other cues.
However, other disturbance-related data
collected during the ait–2 study (ENRI,
2000) does not fit well with stimulus
response data from other sources. Sea
lions are widely thought to be intolerant
of helicopter noise (Porter, 1997), yet
the animals in question did not appear
to respond to multiple exposures of
more intense helicopter noise at Ugak
Island than that from the rocket (ENRI,
2000). They are also thought to be
intolerant of humans on foot, yet a video
from the ait–2 study shows hauled-out
sea lions on Ugak Island undisturbed by
biologists actively engaged in work
within 328 ft (100 m) of them. The Ugak
Island haulout is also regularly exposed
to disturbances from aircraft and fishing
vessels transiting Narrow Strait.
Recent studies (Lawson et al., 2002,
and NAWS, 2002) suggest that Level B
harassment, as evidenced by beach
flushing, will sometimes occur upon
exposure to launch sounds with ASEL’s
of 100 dBA (re 20 micro-Pa2 -sec) or
higher. It is expected that most received
noise levels at Ugak Island would be at
levels which are likely to cause a
temporary disturbance. The infrequent
(up to nine times per year) and brief (no
more than one minute as heard from
Ugak Island) nature of these sounds that
would result from a rocket launch
would cause masking for not more than
a very small fraction of the time during
any single launch day and it is unlikely
that pinnipeds will become habituated
to launch sounds. In addition, the
extremely rapid departure of the rockets
means that pinnipeds would be exposed
to increased sound levels for very short
time intervals, and because launches are
conducted relatively infrequently,
neither physiological stress nor hearing
related injuries are likely. Therefore,
NMFS anticipates that the effects of
rocket launches from KLC would have
no significant effects on the abilities of
sea lions to hear one another or to detect
natural environmental sounds, and
would have no more than a negligible
impact on Steller sea lion populations.
Harbor Seals
An ongoing scientific research
program has been conducted since 1997
to determine the long-term cumulative
impacts of space vehicle launches on
the haul-out behavior, population
dynamics and hearing acuity of harbor
seals at Vandenberg Air Force Base
(VAFB) in California. The response of
harbor seals to rocket launch noise
depended on the intensity of the noise
(dependent on the size of the vehicle
and its proximity) and the age of the
seal. The percentage of seals leaving the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
haul-out increases with noise level up to
approximately 100 dB ASEL, after
which almost all seals leave, although
recent data has shown that an increasing
percentage of seals have remained on
shore, and those that remain are adults
(Thorson et al., 1999). Given the high
degree of site fidelity among harbor
seals, it is likely that those seals that
remained on the haul-out site during
rocket launches had previously been
exposed to launches; that is, it is
possible that adult seals have become
acclimated to the launch noise and react
differently than the younger
inexperienced seals. The louder the
launch noise, the longer it took for seals
to begin returning to the haulout site
and for the numbers to return to prelaunch levels. In two past Athena
IKONOS launches with ASELs of 107.3
and 107.8 dB at the closest haulout site,
seals began to haulout again
approximately 16–55 minutes postlaunch (Thorson et al., 1999). In
contrast, noise levels from an Atlas
launch and several Titan II launches
had ASELs ranging from 86.7 to 95.7 dB
at the closest haulout, and seals began
to return to the haulout within 2–8
minutes post-launch. Seals returned to
the haulouts within 2 to 55 minutes of
the launch disturbance, and the haulout
usually returned to pre-launch levels
within 45 to 120 minutes.
In addition to behavioral disturbance,
loud sounds may also cause TTS, which
is a slight, recoverable loss of hearing.
In order to further determine if harbor
seals experience any change in their
hearing sensitivity as a result of launch
noise, researchers conducted Auditory
Brainstem Response (ABR) testing on 10
harbor seals prior to, and after, the
launches of 3 Titan IV rockets (one of
the loudest launch vehicles at the south
VAFB haul-out site). Detailed analysis
of the changes in waveform latency and
waveform replication of the ABR
measurements showed that there were
no detectable changes in the seals’
hearing sensitivity as a result of the
launch noise (SRS Technologies, 2001).
The launches at VAFB do not appear
to have had long-term effects on the
harbor seal population in this area. The
total population of harbor seals at VAFB
is estimated to be 1,040 animals and has
been increasing at an annual rate of 12.6
percent. Since 1997, there have been 5
to 7 space vehicle launches per year and
there appears to be only short-term
disturbance effects to harbor seals as a
result of launch noise (SRS
Technologies, 2001). Harbor seals will
temporarily leave their haul-out when
exposed to launch noise; however they
generally return to the haul-out within
one hour.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Harbor seals use Ugak Island as a
pupping site. Though no launches have
as yet taken place during the pupping
period at Ugak Island (late May through
mid-June), they may at some point in
the future. There has been little
systematic study of the reactions of
pinnipeds to rocket launches or aircraft
overflights during pupping periods.
Pinnipeds hauled out for pupping or
molting are generally the most
responsive to aircraft overflights
(Richardson et al., 1995). Harbor seals
often leave beaches when aircraft fly
over and then sometimes haulout at a
different site afterwards, which results
in permanent separation if pups are
unable to follow their mothers into the
water. Additionally, very young pups
that are pushed into the water as the
adults flush may subsequently drown.
One study showed more than 10 percent
of approximately 2000 pups born on one
Alaskan island died as a result of
disturbance from low-flying aircraft
(Richardson et al., 1995). The same
study found that aircraft were more
disturbing on calm days, when at low
altitudes, and after recent disturbances.
Since harbor seals have been shown to
flush into the water in response to
rocket launch noise of a level similar to
that occurring at Ugak Island, one can
infer that separation of pups from their
mothers could occur if the launch
occurred during a pupping period and
the harbor seals were using the north
side of the island to pup on.
Rocket launches at KLC have
associated security overflights that
occur an approximate total of 5 to 10
times per day in the days preceding and
following the launch. Several studies of
both harbor seals and Steller sea lions
cited in Richardson et al., 2005, suggest
that these animals respond significantly
less to overflights of both planes and
helicopters that occur above 305 m (0.2
mi). One mitigation requirement
included in the rule is that security
overflights immediately associated with
the launch will not approach occupied
pinniped haulouts on Ugak Island by
closer than 0.25 mile (0.4 km), and will
maintain a vertical distance of 1000 ft
(305 m) from the haulouts when within
0.5 miles (0.8 km), unless indications of
human presence or activity warrant
closer inspection of the area to assure
that national security interests are
protected in accord with law.
Monitoring flights will not approach
closer than 0.25 (0.4 km) mile from the
island. It is unlikely that either of these
overflights will add noticeably to any
harassment of pinnipeds surrounding
the rocket launches.
Harbor seals primarily use the east
side of Ugak Island, though they
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
sometimes use the north side of the
island both for hauling out and for
pupping. For several reasons, NMFS
believes that the seals using the east
side of the island are not likely to be
harassed by rocket launch noise: the
eastern shoreline faces away from the
point the rocket noise is emanating from
and is backed up by a 300–500–ft (91.4–
152.4 km) cliff; the rough seas hitting
rocks make the ambient noise very loud
on the eastern shoreline; and data
collected during the ait–2 launch
showed that one hour after the launch,
when sea lions were swimming
immediately off the rocks on the north
shore, the harbor seals were still hauled
out in the same numbers and at the
same locations that they were 5 hours
before the launch. NMFS believes that
harbor seals hauled out on the north
beach may be temporarily behaviorally
disturbed and possibly temporarily
displaced from their haulouts
immediately following rocket launches.
If launches occur during the harbor seal
pupping period and harbor seals have
also chosen to pup on the north beach,
it is possible that harbor seal pups could
die as a result of the adults flushing in
response to the rocket noise. NMFS
believes that the proposed action may
result in the temporary behavioral
disturbance and, less likely, mortality
(pups only) of small numbers, in
relation to the population numbers (see
next section), of harbor seals. NMFS
anticipates that these impacts will have
no more than a negligible effect on the
species stock.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Taken by Harassment
The highest number of Steller sea
lions seen at one time on Ugak Island
since 1993 is approximately 375 (1997).
However, based on both dedicated and
opportunistic surveys by one researcher,
approximately 160 were seen in 1999
and numbers have decreased since then
(Wynne, pers. comm., 2005).
Approximately 50 were seen in 2001
and numbers have further decreased
since then. Steller sea lions seasonally
use the Ugak island sites (the northern
spit, and occasionally the southwest tip)
as haulout sites from late June to early
October. While not logistically optimal
for the applicant, the fastest that KLC
can prepare the facilities for a new
launch right after a launch is 4 weeks,
which means that at most it would be
logistically possible to have four
launches a year within the time that the
sea lions are using Ugak Island as a
haulout. Based on the maximum
number seen and the sea lion trend over
the last several years, NMFS anticipates
that the most sea lions likely to be
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4305
harassed during one launch is 300. This
translates to the potential harassment of
1,200 Steller sea lions in one year
(assuming different individual sea lions
are harassed each launch). However a
mitigation measure is required that will
limit the number of launches within the
time that sea lions are present to three,
which lowers the number of potential
harassments to 900 animals annually.
This is a small number relative to the
affected stock.
Harbor seal numbers have steadily
increased at Ugak Island since 1992, and
just over 900 were counted during the
molt in 2004 (Wynne, pers. comm.,
2005). The last pupping season counts
showed 290 adults and 88 pups in 1993,
and 292 adults and 96 pups in 1994.
According to local researchers, the
primary haulout for harbor seals is on
the east side of the island (where NMFS
does not believe there are likely to be
any effects from the rocket launch noise)
and the majority of the seals may be
found there. In three days of her 1994
survey, Wynne (2005) found that an
average of approximately 25 percent of
both adults and pups were hauled out
on the north side of the beach.
Therefore, NMFS estimates that of a
maximum of 900 harbor seals present
during any launch, 275 of them may be
located on the north side of the island
and exposed to the rocket launch noise.
Harbor seals are present at Ugak all year,
which means that if there were nine
launches in one year, a maximum of
2,475 harbor seals could be exposed to
the noise and potentially harassed in
one year (assuming different individuals
were present each launch, else the
number is smaller, but some may be
harassed more than one time). The
harbor seal pupping season runs from
mid-May through June. Since it takes a
minimum of 4 weeks to prepare for a
new launch, it would be logistically
possible to have two launches during
that time. The highest number of pups
seen at Ugak was 96 in 1994. Though
numbers of pups have probably
increased with the numbers of adults
since 1994 (by a factor of three), only a
minority of pups (estimated one fourth)
will likely be present on the north side
of the island and exposed to the noise
and potential flushing of adults. One
scientist reported that more than 10
percent of 2000 harbor seal pups died
on an Alaskan Island following
disturbance from exposures to low
flying aircrafts (Richardson et al., 1995).
NMFS estimates that if 72 pups (highest
number seen (in 1996) multiplied by
three for population increase and
divided by four to account for number
exposed on north side of island) were
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4306
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
twice exposed to rocket noise sufficient
to flush the adults, up to 20 harbor seal
pups (15 percent) might die. However,
one required mitigation measure limits
AADC to one launch during the
pupping season, which lowers the
potential mortality of harbor seal pups
to 11 annually (55 over the life of the
regulations). NMFS believes that a small
number (no more than 2,488) of harbor
seals may be affected relative to the
population estimates.
Effects of Rocket Launches on
Subsistence Needs
There are no subsistence uses of
pinniped species in Alaska waters
within the KLC primary study area, and,
therefore, NMFS anticipates no effects
on subsistence needs.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Effects of Rocket Launches on Marine
Mammal Habitat
Solid rocket boosters would fall into
the ocean away from any known or
potential haulouts and the chances of a
cetacean being in the wrong place at the
wrong time are discountable. All sonic
booms that reach the earth’s surface
would be expected to be over open
ocean beyond the outer continental
shelf. Airborne launch sounds would
mostly reflect or refract from the water
surface and, except for sounds within a
diameter of approximately 26 degrees
directly below the launch vehicle,
would not penetrate into the water
column. The sounds that do penetrate
would not persist in the water for more
than a few seconds. Overall, rocket
launch activities from KLC would not be
expected to cause any impacts to
habitats used by marine mammals,
including pinniped haulouts, or to their
food sources.
Mitigation
Under Section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA,
adverse impacts are to be reduced to the
lowest level practicable. Due to the
nature of the rocket launches and the
pinnipeds responses, the most obvious
way to mitigate for the effects of the
rocket launch noise is to minimize the
number of launches that the Steller sea
lions and harbor seals are exposed to.
This sort of mitigation is logistically
difficult and impracticable for AADC, as
their launch operations are driven by
the needs of the agencies and companies
that utilize their facilities. However,
NMFS and the applicant have worked
out a way to reduce the potential Level
B Harassment of sea lions by 25 percent
and to reduce the potential Level A
Harassment or mortality of harbor seal
pups by 50 percent.
In their application, AADC asked for
authorization to take marine mammals
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
during nine rocket launches annually.
The quickest that the launch pad can be
turned around for another launch is four
weeks. This means that it would be
logistically possible to launch 4 rockets
during the season that the Steller sea
lions are using Ugak Island, and
logistically possible to launch two
rockets during the harbor seal pupping
season. As a mitigation measure, NMFS
has incorporated into the rule and LOAs
a requirement that not more than an
average of three launches per year could
occur within the sea lion season, and
not more than an average of one launch
per year could occur during the harbor
seal pupping season. Therefore, no more
than 15 launches would occur within
the sea lion season (June 15 - September
30) over the course of the 5–year rule,
and no more than 5 launches would
occur during the harbor seal pupping
season (May 15 - June 30) over the
course of the 5–year rule.
Even though the video monitoring of
Steller sea lions at Ugak Island indicates
they did not flush in response to
helicopter or noise recorded during the
same time period, the scientific
literature shows that pinnipeds will
often have an adverse response to lowflying aircraft. AADC typically flies
several security overflights in
conjunction with a rocket launch. As a
result, NMFS has incorporated a
mitigation measure wherein the security
flights immediately associated with
rocket launches would not approach
closer than 0.25 mile (0.4 km) to
occupied pinniped haulout sites or fly
lower than 1000 ft (305 m) when the
plane is closer than 0.5 miles (0.8 km)
from occupied pinniped sites on Ugak
Island unless indications of human
presence or activity warrant closer
inspection of the area to assure that
national security interests are protected
in accord with law.
Monitoring
Marine Mammal Monitoring
The objective of monitoring Steller
sea lions and Pacific harbor seals is to
detect any indications of pinniped
disturbance, injury, or mortality that
results from KLC rocket launches at the
Ugak Island haulout site. Monitoring
would be conducted on Ugak Island for
launches that take place between June
15 and September 30, an observation
period that includes the seasonal
occupation of the Steller sea lions as
well as the molting period of the harbor
seals (when their numbers are higher
and their responses to disturbance
potentially greater). Launches occurring
during the harbor seal pupping season
(May 15 – June 30) would also be
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
monitored. All haulout areas on Ugak
Island would be monitored before,
during, and after launch operations to
document and characterize any
observed responses. Monitoring would
be designed to determine the type of
reactions (or injury or mortality) and
their relationship to noises associated
with rocket launches. Fixed-wing aerial
surveys would be flown for any
launches taking place from June 15
through September 30 using a minimum
flight altitude of 156 m (500 ft) above
sea level (ASL) to be flown at low tide
or, with consultation, toward evening.
The aircraft would come no closer than
0.25 miles (0.4 km) to the haulout.
Depending on aircraft availability, one
or two NMFS-approved biologist
observers would accompany the pilot.
Data will be gathered both visually and
with a camera having a zoom lens. A
total of five surveys would be flown, if
weather conditions permit. The first
would occur the day prior to a
scheduled launch and the second as
soon after the launch as possible.
Replicate surveys will be flown the
following three successive days to
determine post-launch haulout-use
patterns.
For any launches that occur from June
15 through September 30, a real-time
video record will be made of sea lion
reactions to launch-related noises. This
will be accomplished by the installation
of a remote custom-designed, closedcircuit, weatherproof, time-lapse video
camera system at the base of the Ugak
Island sea lion haulout before a launch,
which will be retrieved post-launch.
Results of the aerial and video surveys
will be compared, providing
information on startle effects and
durations. In addition, video data will
be time-correlated with rocket motor
noise measurements to provide
objective information on any startle
responses or indications of disturbance
reactions that may occur resulting from
rocket launches. Comparisons will also
be made with baseline data assembled
by AADC to help gauge any natural
trends that may be occurring.
The majority of harbor seals haul out
on the eastern side of Ugak Island,
which is completely inaccessible to
pedestrian or boat traffic due to the high
cliffs and violent surf, so it is not
possible to set up video recorders there.
However, approximately 25 percent of
the harbor seals haul out on the eastern
end of the north-facing shore of Ugak
Island. Though it has not yet been
attempted, it may be possible to set up
a camera with a zoom lens on the
accessible western end of the northfacing shore to record harbor seal
behavior on the middle or eastern end
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
of the shore, or on the rocks off shore.
At some time prior to the first launch
that occurs between May 15 and June
30, when harbor seals are present
(perhaps immediately before or after the
camera has already been set up to record
sea lions), AADC will test the efficacy
of using the camera on the harbor seal
haulout and report their findings to
NMFS. If successful, the same real-time
video and acoustic measurements (see
below) will be conducted when
launches occur during the harbor seal
pupping season as occur when the sea
lions are present.
NMFS believes it unlikely that the
security overflights immediately
preceding and following the rocket
launches would result in the harassment
of marine mammals. However, when
pinnipeds are present at haulouts
during security overflights associated
with rocket launches, a member of the
flight crew will note and record whether
pinnipeds appeared to flush as a result
of the overflight and estimate a number.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Acoustic Measurements
Rocket motor noise monitoring would
be done concurrently with video
monitoring at the Ugak Island haulouts.
These data will be synchronized to the
video data to document correlations
between noise signatures and pinniped
responses. Sound intensity and
frequency metrics will be recorded
before, during, and after a launch by an
SLM mounted on a permanent
stanchion upon the Ugak Island haulout
one day or more before a launch and
retrieved within one day post-launch.
The SLM will be set to highlight sounds
greater than 70 dBA.
Reporting
In the event that any cases of
pinniped injury or mortality are judged
to result from launch activities at any
time during the period covered by these
regulations, this event will be reported
to NMFS immediately.
Data from monitoring activities would
be analyzed, summarized, and reported
to NMFS within 90 calendar days
following cessation of field activities for
each launch. The report would include
the timing and nature (vehicle type,
azimuth, measured sound data) of
launch operations as well as the times
of the monitoring flights. The report
would include sea lion and harbor seal
counts (separated into adult and pup),
as well as observations of any other
marine mammals seen during
monitoring or security overflights. The
report will summarize behavioral
observations in relation to recorded, or
other known, stimuli (launches or
aircraft), and estimate the number of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
affected animals and the nature of their
reactions. The report will include a
summary of the acoustic measurements.
The report will include a copy of all
videotapes containing sea lion and
harbor seal footage, and selected
illustrative 35mm pictures, crossreferenced to the appropriate launches
and acoustic measurements. AADC
would also include this information in
its Annual Environmental Monitoring
and Natural Resources Management
Report.
An interim technical report is
proposed to be submitted to NMFS 60
days prior to the expiration of each
annual LOA issued under these
regulations, along with any request for
a subsequent annual LOA. This interim
technical report would provide full
documentation of methods, results, and
interpretation pertaining to all
monitoring tasks for launches during the
period covered by the LOA. NMFS
recognizes that only preliminary
information would be available for any
launches during the 60–day period
immediately preceding the expiration of
the LOA.
In addition to annual interim
technical reports, NMFS is requiring
AADC to submit a draft comprehensive
technical report to NMFS 180 days prior
to the expiration of the regulations. This
draft technical report would provide full
documentation of methods, results, and
interpretation of all monitoring tasks for
launches during the first four LOA’s,
plus preliminary information for
launches during the first 6 months of
the final LOA. AADC will incorporate
NMFS recommendations on the draft
report and submit a final comprehensive
technical report within 60 days of the
expiration of the regulations.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The FAA prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and subsequently
issued a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) for AADC’s proposal to
construct and operate a launch site at
Narrow Cape on Kodiak Island, Alaska.
Since 1998, AADC has provided
monitoring reports related to noise and
marine mammal impacts associated
with ongoing rocket launches from KLC.
After reviewing the new information
contained in the monitoring reports and
considering the MMC’s comments that
impacts to harbor seals should be more
comprehensively addressed, NMFS
decided that a more current
environmental analysis was necessary.
In 2005, NMFS prepared an EA on the
Promulgation of Regulations
Authorizing Take of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Rocket Launches at Kodiak
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4307
Launch Complex, Alaska, and the
Issuance of Subsequent Letters of
Authorization. NMFS found that the
promulgation of a 5–yr Rule and
issuance of LOAs will not significantly
impact the quality of the human
environment and issued a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI).
Accordingly, preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement or
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for this action was not
necessary.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The endangered Steller sea lion is the
only federally listed marine mammal
under NMFS’ jurisdiction that is likely
to be adversely affected by the proposed
action. Ugak Island also contains
designated critical habitat for the Steller
sea lion. The FAA and NMFS have
consulted with the Endangered Species
Division of the NMFS Alaska Region. A
Biological Opinion (BO) issued in
November, 2003 found that the
proposed action is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
listed species nor result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat.
The northern sea otter, federally listed
as threatened under the ESA, may be
found in the KLC area throughout the
year. The northern sea otter is within
the jurisdiction of the USFWS, which is
responsible for issuing authorizations
and incidental take statements for takes
of this species. AADC is currently in
consultation with USFWS regarding the
sea otter.
Steller’s eider, federally listed
threatened and under the jurisdiction of
the USFWS, is found in the vicinity of
the KLC. Following several years of
recommended monitoring of both
Steller’s eiders and bald eagles (not
federally listed in Alaska), the USFWS
concurred with AADC’s conclusion that
the rocket launches at AADC have no
effect on either of these species.
Classification
This action has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The rule would apply only to
AADC, and would have no effect,
directly or indirectly, on small
businesses. The rule may affect a small
number of contractors providing
services related to reporting the impact
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4308
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
of the activity on marine mammals,
some of whom may be small businesses,
but the number involved would not be
substantial. Because of this certification,
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required, and none was prepared. No
comments concerning this certification
were prepared.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. This
proposed rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
provisions of the PRA. This collection
has been approved previously by OMB
under section 3504(b) of the PRA issued
under OMB control number 0648–0151,
and includes applications for LOAs and
reports.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians,
Labeling, Marine mammals, Penalties,
Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Seafood, Transportation.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
50 CFR part 216 is amended as follows:
I
PART 216—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKING AND
IMPORTING OF MARINE MAMMALS
1. The authority citation for part 216
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
2. Subparts R, S, and T are added and
reserved.
I
Subpart U—Taking of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Rocket Launches from
the Kodiak Launch Complex, Kodiak
Island, AK
§ 216.230 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply
only to the incidental taking of marine
mammals specified in paragraph (b) of
this section by U.S. citizens engaged in
rocket launch activities (up to nine
launches per year) at the Kodiak Launch
Complex on Kodiak Island, Alaska.
(b) The incidental take of marine
mammals under the activity identified
in paragraph (a) of this section is limited
to Steller sea lions (Eumetopius jubatus)
and Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina
richardsi).
§ 216.231
Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are
effective from February 27, 2006
through February 28, 2011.
§ 216.232
Permissible methods of taking.
(a) Under a Letter of Authorization
issued pursuant to § 216.106, the Alaska
Aerospace Development Corporation
and its contractors, may incidentally,
but not intentionally, take Steller sea
lions by Level B harassment, take adult
Pacific harbor seals by Level B
harassment, and take harbor seal pups
by Level B or Level A harassment or
mortality, in the course of conducting
missile launch activities within the area
described in § 216.230(a), provided all
terms, conditions, and requirements of
these regulations and such Letter of
Authorization are complied with.
(b) The activities identified in
§ 216.230(a) must be conducted in a
manner that minimizes, to the greatest
extent practicable, adverse impacts on
marine mammals and their habitat.
§ 216.233
Prohibitions.
3. Subpart U is added to read as
follows:
The following activities are
prohibited:
Subpart U—Taking of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Rocket Launches from
the Kodiak Launch Complex, Kodiak
Island, AK
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
I
(a) The taking of a marine mammal
that is other than unintentional.
(b) The violation of, or failure to
comply with, the terms, conditions, and
requirements of this subpart or a Letter
of Authorization issued under
§ 216.106.
(c) The incidental taking of any
marine mammal of a species not
specified, or in a manner not
authorized, in this subpart.
Sec.
216.230 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
216.231 Effective dates.
216.232 Permissible methods of taking.
216.233 Prohibitions.
216.234 Mitigation, monitoring and
reporting.
216.235 Letter of Authorization.
216.236 Renewal of a Letter of
Authorization.
216.237 Modifications to a Letter of
Authorization.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
§ 216.234 Mitigation, monitoring and
reporting.
(a) No more than five launches may
occur between May 15 and June 30
within the 5–year period, and no more
than 15 launches may occur between
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
June 15 and September 30 within the 5–
year period.
(b) The holder of the Letter of
Authorization must implement the
following measures for all launches
occurring from June through October:
(1) Conduct five replicate fixed-wing
aerial surveys of all hauled out Steller
sea lions and harbor seals at Ugak
Island, each flown at low tide (weather
permitting), using a minimum flight
altitude of 500 feet (152 meters) above
sea level, with an approach no closer
than 0.25 mi (0.40 km) to the haulout,
and conducted a day prior to, directly
following, and for three consecutive
days after a launch.
(2) At least one biologist observer will
accompany the pilot during all aerial
surveys.
(3) Data gathered during aerial
surveys will be gathered visually and
through the use of a camera with a zoom
lens.
(4) A real-time video record of Steller
sea lion reactions to launch noise will
be made using a video camera system
placed upon the Ugak Island haulout
before a scheduled launch and then
retrieved after the launch.
(5) Sound intensities and frequencies
of rocket motor noise will be recorded
before, during, and after a launch by a
sound level monitor mounted upon the
Ugak Island haulout and set to highlight
sounds greater than 70 dBA. Monitors
will be installed one day or more before
a launch and retrieved within one day
post-launch.
(c) A trial effort to obtain real-time
video records of harbor seals hauled out
at the eastern end of the northern side
of the island and their reactions to
launch noise will be made as soon as
practicable. A brief report summarizing
the efficacy of this monitoring effort
should be included in the standard
monitoring reports for that launch and
year. If valuable data may be gathered
using this method, real-time video
records of harbor seals reactions to
launch noise will be made before
launches scheduled between May 15
and June 30, and between June 30 and
September 30 if the equipment is not
being used to record Steller sea lions,
and then retrieved after the launches.
(d) Security flights immediately
associated with rocket launches may not
approach closer than 0.25 mile (0.4 km)
to occupied pinniped haulout sites on
Ugak Island or fly lower than 1000 ft
(305 m) when the plane is closer than
0.5 miles (0.8 km) from occupied
pinniped sites on Ugak Island unless
indications of human presence or
activity warrant closer inspection of the
area to assure that national security
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
interests are protected in accordance
with the law.
(e) When pinnipeds are present at
haulouts during security overflights
associated with rocket launches, and
when practicable, a member of the flight
crew will note and record whether
pinnipeds appeared to flush as a result
of the overflight and estimate a number.
(f) The holder of the Letter of
Authorization is required to cooperate
with the National Marine Fisheries
Service and any other Federal, state or
local agency monitoring the impacts of
the activity on marine mammals. The
holder must notify the NMFS Alaska
Assistant Regional Administrator for
Protected Resources and to the NMFS
Division of Permits, Conservation, and
Education, Office of Protected Resources
at least 2 weeks prior to commencing
monitoring activities.
(g) Activities related to the monitoring
described in paragraph (a) of this
section or in the Letter of Authorization
may be conducted without a separate
scientific research permit.
(h) In coordination and compliance
with the Alaska Aerospace Development
Corporation, the National Marine
Fisheries Service may place an observer
on Kodiak or Ugak Islands for any
marine mammal monitoring activity
prior to, during, or after a missile launch
to monitor impacts on marine mammals,
provided observers are not within the
calculated danger zone of the rocket’s
flight path during a launch.
(i) The holder of the Letter of
Authorization must comply with any
other applicable state or federal permits,
regulations, and environmental
monitoring agreements set up with other
agencies.
(j) The National Marine Fisheries
Service must be informed immediately
of any proposed changes or deletions to
any portions of the monitoring
requirements.
(k) The holder of the Letter of
Authorization must implement the
following reporting requirements:
(1) If indications of injurious or lethal
take are recorded, the NMFS Alaska
Assistant Regional Administrator for
Protected Resources and the NMFS
Division of Permits, Conservation, and
Education, Office of Protected
Resources, or their designees, will be
contacted within 48 hours. In
consultation with the National Marine
Fisheries Service, launch procedure,
mitigation measures, and monitoring
methods must be reviewed and
appropriate changes made prior to the
next launch.
(2) Data from monitoring activities
will be reported to the National Marine
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Fisheries Service within 90 days
following cessation of field activities for
each launch. After the trial effort to
videotape harbor seals at the eastern end
of the north side of Ugak island, a
summary of the effectiveness of the
videotaping will be included in the
associated launch report.
(3) An interim technical report must
be submitted to the NMFS Alaska
Assistant Regional Administrator for
Protected Resources and to the NMFS
Division of Permits, Conservation, and
Education, Office of Protected Resources
at least 60 days prior to the expiration
of each annual Letter of Authorization.
This report must contain the following
information:
(i) Timing and nature of launch
operations and monitoring flights;
(ii) A summary of marine mammal
behavioral observations in relation to
recorded acoustic stimuli and other
known visual or audio stimuli;
(iii) An estimate of the amount and
nature of all takes.
(iv) A copy of all videotapes
containing sea lion and harbor seal
footage, and selected illustrative 35 mm
or digital pictures, cross-referenced to
the appropriate launches and acoustic
measurements.
(4) A draft comprehensive technical
report will be submitted to the NMFS
Alaska Assistant Regional Administrator
for Protected Resources and to the
NMFS Division of Permits,
Conservation, and Education, Office of
Protected Resources, 180 days prior to
the expiration of these regulations with
full documentation of the methods,
results, and interpretation of all
monitoring tasks for launches during all
expired Letters of Authorization, plus
preliminary information for launches
during the first 6 months of the final
Letter of Authorization.
(5) A revised final comprehensive
technical report, including all
monitoring results during the entire
period of the Letter of Authorization,
will be due 90 days after the end of the
period of effectiveness of these
regulations.
(6) The interim and draft
comprehensive technical reports will be
subject to review and comment by the
National Marine Fisheries Service. Any
recommendations made by the National
Marine Fisheries Service must be
addressed in the final comprehensive
technical report prior to acceptance by
the National Marine Fisheries Service.
§ 216.235
Letter of Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization, unless
suspended or revoked, will be valid for
a period of time specified in the Letter
of Authorization, but a Letter of
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4309
Authorization may not be valid beyond
the effective period of the regulations.
(b) A Letter of Authorization will set
forth:
(1) Species of marine mammals
authorized to be taken;
(2) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(3) Specified geographical region;
(4) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on the
species of marine mammals authorized
for taking and its habitat; and
(5) Requirements for monitoring and
reporting incidental takes.
(c) Issuance of a Letter of
Authorization will be based on a
determination that the number of
marine mammals taken by the activity
will be small, and that the total taking
by the activity as a whole will have no
more than a negligible impact on the
affected species or stocks of marine
mammal(s).
(d) Notice of issuance or denial of a
Letter of Authorization will be
published in the Federal Register
within 30 days of a determination.
§ 216.236 Renewal of a Letter of
Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization for the
activity identified in § 216.230(a) will be
renewed upon:
(1) Notification to the National Marine
Fisheries Service that the activity
described in the application for a Letter
of Authorization submitted under
§ 216.235 will be undertaken and that
there will not be a substantial
modification to the described activity,
mitigation or monitoring undertaken
during the upcoming season;
(2) Timely receipt of and acceptance
by the National Marine Fisheries
Service of the monitoring reports
required under § 216.234;
(3) A determination by the National
Marine Fisheries Service that the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting
measures required under §§ 216.232 and
216.234 and the Letter of Authorization
were undertaken and will be undertaken
during the upcoming period of validity
of a renewed Letter of Authorization;
and
(4) A determination that the number
of marine mammals taken by the
activity will be small and that the total
taking by the activity will have no more
than a negligible impact on the affected
species or stocks of marine mammal(s),
and that the level of taking will be
consistent with the findings made for
the total taking allowable under these
regulations.
(b) A notice of issuance or denial of
a renewal of a Letter of Authorization
will be published in the Federal
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
4310
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 17 / Thursday, January 26, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Register within 30 days of a
determination.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
§ 216.237 Modifications to a Letter of
Authorization.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, no substantive
modification (including withdrawal or
suspension) to a Letter of Authorization
issued pursuant to the provisions of this
subpart shall be made by the National
Marine Fisheries Service until after
notification and an opportunity for
public comment has been provided. A
renewal of a Letter of Authorization
under § 216.236 without modification is
not considered a substantive
modification.
(b) If the Assistant Administrator
determines that an emergency exists
that poses a significant risk to the wellbeing of the species or stocks of marine
mammals specified in § 216.230(b), a
Letter of Authorization may be
substantively modified without prior
notification and an opportunity for
public comment. Notification will be
published in the Federal Register
within 30 days of the action.
Dated: January 19, 2006.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–765 Filed 1–25–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Brad
McHale, 978–281–9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
50 CFR Part 635
[I.D. 011906B]
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason
retention limit adjustment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has determined that
the Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) General
category daily retention limit for the
final three restricted fishing days (RFD)
should be adjusted. These General
category RFDs are being waived to
provide reasonable opportunity for
utilization of the coastwide General
category BFT quota. Therefore, NMFS
waives the final three RFDs scheduled
for January 2006, and increases the daily
retention limit from zero to two large
medium or giant BFT on these
previously designated RFDs.
DATES: Effective dates for BFT daily
retention limits are provided in Table 1
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Regulations implemented under the
authority of the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.)
and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act; 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.) governing the harvest of BFT by
persons and vessels subject to U.S.
jurisdiction are found at 50 CFR part
635. The 2005 General category BFT
fishing season began on June 1, 2005,
and ends January 31, 2006. The final
initial 2005 BFT specifications and
General category effort controls (June 7,
2005; 70 FR 33033) established the
following RFD schedule for the 2005
fishing year: All Fridays, Saturdays, and
Sundays from November 18, 2005,
through January 31, 2006, and
Thursday, November 24, 2005,
inclusive, provided quota remained
available and the fishery was open.
RFDs are intended to extend the General
category BFT fishery late into the
southern Atlantic season. NMFS has
determined that the BFT General
category daily retention limit for the
final three RFDs should be adjusted as
described in Table 1 to provide
reasonable opportunity to utilize the
coastwide General category BFT quota.
TABLE 1.—EFFECTIVE DATES FOR RETENTION LIMIT ADJUSTMENTS
Permit Category
Effective Dates
Atlantic tunas General and HMS Charter/
Headboat (while fishing commercially).
January 27, 28, and 29, 2006.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with RULES
Adjustment of General Category Daily
Retention Limits
Under 50 CFR 635.23(a)(4), NMFS
may increase or decrease the General
category daily retention limit of large
medium and giant BFT over a range
from zero (on RFDs) to a maximum of
three per vessel to allow for maximum
utilization of the quota for BFT. NMFS
has taken multiple actions during the
2005 fishing year in an attempt to allow
for maximum utilization of the General
category BFT quota. On September 28,
2005 (70 FR 56595), NMFS adjusted the
commercial daily BFT retention limit
(on non-RFDs), in all areas, for those
vessels fishing under the General
category quota, to two large medium or
giant BFT, measuring 73 inches (185
cm) or greater curved fork length (CFL),
per vessel per day/trip, effective through
January 31, 2006, inclusive, provided
quota remained available and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Jan 25, 2006
Jkt 208001
Area
All
fishery remained open. On November 9,
2005 (70 FR 67929), NMFS waived the
previously designated RFDs for the
month of November; on December 16,
2005 (70 FR 74712), NMFS waived
designated RFDs for December 16–18,
inclusive; on January 4, 2006 (71 FR
273), NMFS waived designated RFDs for
December 31, 2005, and January 1, 2006,
inclusive; on January 9, 2006 (71 FR
1395), NMFS waived RFDs for January
7, 8, 13, 14, and 15, 2006; and on
January 20, 2006 (71 FR 3245), NMFS
waived the designated RFDs for January
20, 21, and 22, 2006. The daily retention
limit for all the above dates was
adjusted to two large medium or giant
BFT to provide reasonable opportunity
to harvest the coastwide quota.
On December 7, 2005 (70 FR 72724),
NMFS adjusted the General category
quota by conducting a 200 mt inseason
quota transfer to the Reserve category,
resulting in an adjusted General
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BFT Size Class Limit
Two BFT per vessel per day/trip, measuring 73 inches (185 cm) CFL or larger.
category quota of 708.3 mt. This action
was taken to account for any potential
overharvests that may occur in the
Angling category during the 2005
fishing year (June 1, 2005 through May
31, 2006) and to ensure that U.S. BFT
harvest is consistent with international
and domestic mandates.
Catch rates in the BFT General
category fishery have generally been
low, the average catch rate for December
2005 and January 2006 is approximately
3.0 mt/day. Based on a review of dealer
reports, daily landing trends, available
quota, weather conditions, and the
availability of BFT on the fishing
grounds, NMFS has determined that
waiving the final three RFDs established
for January 27, 28, and 29, 2006, and
increasing the General category daily
BFT retention limit on those RFDs is
warranted to assist the fishery in
accessing the available quota. Therefore,
NMFS adjusts the General category
E:\FR\FM\26JAR1.SGM
26JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4297-4310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-765]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 011011247-6006-03; I.D. 082701E]
RIN 0648-AP62
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Rocket Launches from Kodiak Island, AK
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon application from the Alaska Aerospace Development
Corporation (AADC), is issuing regulations to govern the unintentional
takings of small numbers of marine mammals incidental to rocket
launches from the Kodiak Launch Complex (KLC) on Kodiak Island, AK.
Issuance of regulations is required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) when the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), after notice and
opportunity for comment, finds, as here, that such takes will have a
negligible impact on the species and stocks of marine mammals and will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact on their availability for
subsistence uses. These regulations do not authorize AADC's rocket
launch activities, as such authorization is not within the jurisdiction
of the Secretary.
[[Page 4298]]
Rather, these regulations govern the issuance of ``Letters of
Authorization'' (LOAs) for the unintentional incidental take of marine
mammals in connection with this activity and prescribe methods of
taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact on marine mammal species and their habitat, and on the
availability of the species for subsistence uses. In addition, NMFS
incorporates reporting and monitoring requirements.
DATES: Effective from February 27, 2006 through February 28, 2011.
A copy of the AADC application which contains a list of the
references used in this document may be obtained by writing to Steve
Leathery, Division of Permits, Conservation, and Education, Office of
Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3226 or by telephoning the contact
listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). The NMFS
Administrative Record will be maintained at the above address.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimate or any other aspect of
the collection of information requirement contained in this proposed
rule should be sent to NMFS via the means stated above, and to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: NOAA Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503,
David--Rustker@eap.omb.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie Harrison, (301) 713-2289 ext
166, or Brad Smith, (907) 271-3023.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA(16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) directs
the Secretary to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional taking of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings are made and regulations are
issued.
Authorization may be granted for periods of 5 years or less if the
Secretary finds that the total taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on
the availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses, and
regulations are prescribed setting forth the permissible methods of
taking, other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact
on the affected species or stocks and their habitats, and the
requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ``an
impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival.''
Except with respect to categories of activities not pertinent here,
the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Summary of Request
On July 26, 2001, NMFS received an application from the AADC under
section 101(a)(5)(A) of the MMPA for authorization to take, by
harassment, Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) incidental to rocket
launches from KLC on Kodiak Island, Alaska. A proposed rule was
published on October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63114). Comments on the proposed
rule received from the Marine Mammal Commission (MMC) recommended NMFS
consider also authorizing take of Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina
richardsi), as they are also found in the vicinity of KLC. After
consulting with AADC and reanalyzing the distribution and habits of
harbor seals in the area, NMFS has included take of harbor seals in the
final rule. These regulations will allow NMFS to issue annual Letters
Of Authorization (LOAs) to the AADC. A full description of the
operations is contained in the AADC application (AADC, 2001) which is
available upon request (see ADDRESSES) or at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
prot_res/PR2/Small_Take/smalltake_info.htm#applications.
The KLC is a commercial rocket launch complex owned and operated by
the State of Alaska through the AADC. Located wholly on state-owned
lands, KLC occupies 43 acres (0.2 km\2\) within a 3,100 acre (12.6
km\2\) parcel on the eastern side of Kodiak Island on the Narrow Cape
peninsula. The KLC was designed to accommodate a variety of small,
solid rockets including such vehicles as the Minuteman II, Taurus,
Conestoga, and Athena (Lockheed Martin Launch Vehicle). The largest
vehicle that can be launched from KLC is the Athena-2 (Lockheed Martin
Vehicle-2).
Launch operations at the KLC are authorized under license from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Associate
Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST), in accordance
with the facility's Environmental Assessment (EA) and stipulations in
the EA's Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) (see 61 FR 32884,
June 25, 1996). These stipulations included a requirement to develop a
Natural Resource Management Plan (NRMP) to address monitoring and
mitigation activities for protected species in the area. This plan was
developed in coordination with NMFS utilizing comparison of anticipated
sound pressure levels from rocket motors to be launched from the KLC
with documented marine mammal disturbance responses to such noise.
Measurement of Airborne Sound Levels
The following section is provided to facilitate an understanding of
airborne and impulsive noise characteristics. Amplitude is a measure of
the pressure of a sound wave that is usually expressed on a logarithmic
scale with units of sound level or intensity called the decibel (dB).
Sound pressure level (SPL) is described in units of dB re micro-Pascal
(micro-Pa); for energy, the sound energy level (SEL), a measure of the
cumulative energy in a noise event, is described in terms of dB re
micro-Pa\2\-second (dB re micro-Pa\2\-s); and frequency, often referred
to as pitch, is described in units of cycles per second or Hertz (Hz).
In other words, SEL is the squared instantaneous sound pressure over a
specified time interval, where the sound pressure is averaged over 5
percent to 95 percent of the duration of the sound.
For airborne noise measurements the convention is to use 20 micro-
Pa as the reference pressure, which is the approximate threshold for
onset of human hearing and is 26 dB above the underwater sound pressure
reference of 1 micro-Pa and is. However, the conversion from air to
water intensities is more involved than this and is beyond the scope of
this document. NMFS recommends interested readers review NOAA's
tutorial on this issue: https://www.pmel.noaa.gov/vents/acoustics/
tutorial/tutorial.html.
Airborne sounds are also often expressed as broadband A-weighted
(dBA) or C-weighted (dBC) sound levels. When frequency levels are made
to correspond to human hearing, they are referred to as being A-
weighted or A-filtered. With A-weighting, sound energy at frequencies
below 1 kHz and above 6 kHz are de-emphasized and approximates the
human ear's response to sounds below 55 dB. C-weighting is often used
in the analysis of high-
[[Page 4299]]
amplitude noises like explosions, and corresponds to the relative
response to the human ear to sound levels above 85 dB. C-weighting de-
emphasizes ear frequency components of less than about 50 Hz. C-weight
scaling is also useful for analyses of sounds having predominantly low-
frequency sounds, such as sonic booms. For continuous noise like rocket
launches, the important variables relevant to assessing auditory
impacts or behavioral responses are intensity, frequency spectrum, and
duration. In this document, sound levels have been provided with A-
weighting.
Description of the Activity
To date there have been eight rocket launches from the KLC;
however, the KLC facility is licensed to launch up to nine rockets per
year. The first two launches used composite vehicles built from several
stages taken from a decommissioned USAF Minuteman II launch vehicle,
and were part of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) atmospheric interceptor
technology (ait) program. The third and the sixth launches (March 2001
and April 2002) were part of the USAF Quick Reaction Launch Vehicle
(QRLV) program, and comprised of single stage M-56 motors taken from a
decommissioned USAF Minuteman II launch vehicle. The fourth launch
(September 2001) was a commercial Lockheed/Martin Athena rocket, which
is the largest vehicle to be launched from KLC, and it placed four
satellites into polar orbit. The fifth, seventh, and eighth launches
(November 2001, December 2004, and February 2005) were Department of
Defense (DoD) Strategic Target System (STARS) vehicles and consisted of
the first two stages of a decommissioned A-3 missile and an Orbis third
stage.
Launches from the KLC are expected to be at high inclination with
launch azimuths ranging from 125 to 225 degrees in direction (AADC and
AST, 1996). At the easternmost azimuth, launch vehicle paths would pass
over the eastern edge of Ugak Island; at the westernmost azimuth, the
vehicle would pass along the southeastern edge of the Kodiak
Archipelago. Approximately 70 seconds after launch, a typical launch
vehicle would be more than 8 miles (12.5 km) high. Spent first-stage
rocket motors and fuel casings would impact the ocean's surface from 11
to 314 n-mi (20 to 582 km) downrange, depending on the launch vehicle
(AADC and AST, 1996). Rocket motor sonic booms are predicted to reach
the ocean surface over 20 miles (32 km) downrange beyond the outer
continental shelf over deep ocean.
Launch operations are a major source of noise on Kodiak Island, as
the operation of launch vehicle engines produces significant sound
levels. Generally, four types of noise occur during a launch. They are:
(1) Combustion noise from launch vehicle chambers; (2) jet noise
generated by the interaction of the exhaust jet and the atmosphere; (3)
combustion noise from the post-burning of combustion products; and (4)
sonic booms. The principal objective of the KLC rocket motor noise
monitoring task within the NRMP was to measure A-weighted Sound Energy
Levels (ASELs) at the Ugak Island Steller sea lion haulout. A secondary
objective was to monitor sound levels on Narrow Cape close to bald
eagle and/or Steller's eider nests when present. ASELs were
successfully recorded for the first four and the seventh launches from
KLC at the Ugak Island Steller sea lion haulout and on Narrow Cape by
the University of Alaska Anchorage's Environment and Natural Resources
Institute (ENRI). The Ugak Island haulout is located approximately 2
miles (3.2 km) from Narrow Cape and about 3.5 miles (5.6 km) from the
KLC launch pad on a narrow sand spit on the north side of the Island.
The data gathered were weighted toward frequencies that humans are more
sensitive to (1-6 kHz, A-weighted) and showed a wide variation in sound
pressures among rocket motors, with the highest levels being associated
with the largest launch vehicle flown. Variations in the KLC sound
pressure record are likely due to such variables as engine size, engine
bell shape, and local atmospheric conditions. Summaries of the findings
for each of the measured rocket launches to date are described below. A
complete description of the proposed rocket launches from KLC may be
found in AADC's application, which may be viewed at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Small_Take/smalltake_
info.htm#applications. This information is incorporated into this
document by reference.
ait-1
The first launch from KLC occurred in November 1998, and was the
first of the USAF ait program. Sound measurements from the ait-1 launch
were collected using two sound level monitors (SLMs) that were deployed
26 hours before launch on Ugak Island at the base of the spit used as a
haulout by Steller sea lions. The SLMs were set to highlight sounds
exceeding 65 dB, which was done after checking real-time sound levels
in the field at each site prior to setting them to record data. If the
exceedance levels were set too low, the SLMs would be deluged with
data, and if they were set too high the SLMs would miss the event of
interest. A digital audio tape (DAT) recorder was used to provide
redundancy in recording noise frequencies and was placed about 0.75 mi
(1.2 km) from the KLC launch pad.
Recorded sound pressure levels (SPLs) of rocket motor noise for the
ait-1 at the Ugak Island haulout site were 78.2 dB re 20 microPa with a
peak level of 97 dB (Table 1). The associated ASEL at the Ugak Island
haulout was 88.4 dB re 20 microPa2 s. In addition, the ASEL at the
nearest location measured by the DAT recorder was 110 dB for a duration
of 59 seconds. The bulk of the sound energy was at low frequencies and
generally less than 4000 Hz. Most of the energy was from 100 to 500 Hz.
[[Page 4300]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26JA06.000
Of the eight noise events recorded above 65 dB at Ugak Island, ENRI
determined that two are attributable to helicopter noise and one to the
firing of the ait-1 rocket motor. Sounds at the Ugak Island site were
above 65 dB for a total of 33 seconds at the time the rocket motor was
firing. Due to the isolation of this site, the remainder of the events
are most likely attributable to surf or wind action.
ait-2
USAF launched a second rocket from KLC on September 15, 1999. Based
on experience from the first launch, ENRI set the SLMs to highlight
sounds exceeding 70 dB and deployed them about 19 hours before the
launch. Sound pressures at Ugak Island were slightly higher for the
second launch than for the first launch. Recorded maximum SPLs of
rocket motor noise for the ait-2 at the Ugak Island haulout site were
81.5 dB, with a peak level of 101.5 dB, and a corresponding SEL of 92.2
dB. The bulk of the sound energy was at low frequencies and generally
less than 2500 Hz. Most of the energy was from 25 to 1000 Hz.
There were 15 noise events above 70 dB within the 19 hours of
recording at Ugak Island, all of which can be attributed to helicopter,
airplane, or rocket noise; none coincides with a stampede of Steller
sea lions off the Ugak Island haulout 3.5 hours previous to the rocket
launch. Sounds at the Ugak Island site were above 70 dB for a total of
30 seconds at the time the rocket motor was firing. Natural background
noise levels above 70 dB were almost nonexistent during this launch.
QRLV-1
On March 22, 2001, the USAF conducted the third launch from KLC.
SLMs set to highlight sounds exceeding 70 dB at the base of the Ugak
Island sea lion haulout were again used by ENRI to record sound
frequency and intensity, and were deployed 22 hours before the launch.
The recorded sound levels at Ugak Island were significantly lower for
the QRLV-1 launch than for either of the ait launches. This is likely
due to the vehicle being smaller, and possibly to a different
trajectory and local atmospheric condition. Recorded maximum SPLs
resulting from QRLV rocket motor noise at the Ugak Island haulout site
were 73.3 dB, with a peak level of 87.2 dB, and a corresponding SEL of
80.3 dB. The bulk of the sound energy was at low frequencies and
generally less than 2500 Hz. Most of the energy was from 16 to 2000 Hz.
There were 17 noise events above 70 dB at Ugak Island. With the
exception of the rocket launch, all can be related to helicopter noise.
Sounds at the Ugak Island site were above 70 dB for a total of 10.9
seconds at the time the rocket motor was firing. Natural background
noise levels above 70 dB were almost nonexistent during this launch.
Rocket noise measurements for the QRLV-2 rocket launch on April 24,
2002, the sixth rocket launched from KLC, were not recorded, though
most likely they would be similar to those measured during the first
QRLV launch.
Athena
The fourth launch from KLC occurred on September 29, 2001, and
involved a commercial Lockheed/Martin Athena, which is the largest
vehicle to be launched from KLC. SLMs were again set to highlight
sounds exceeding 70 dB and were deployed by ENRI at the Ugak Island
haulout four hours before the launch. The recorded sound levels at Ugak
Island were significantly higher for the Athena launch than for
previous launches, which is likely due to the size of the vehicle.
Recorded maximum SPLs resulting from Athena rocket motor noise at the
Ugak Island haulout site were 90.8 dB, with a peak level of 115.9 dB,
and a corresponding SEL of 101.4
[[Page 4301]]
dB. The bulk of the sound energy was at low frequencies and generally
less than 2000 Hz.
There were three exceedance events above 70 dB at Ugak Island and
Narrow Cape within the four hours of recording, two of which can be
attributed to helicopter noise and the other to the rocket launch.
Sounds at the Ugak Island site were above 70 dB for 49.6 seconds at the
time the rocket motor was firing. Natural background noise levels above
70 dB were nonexistent during this launch.
STARS
On November 9, 2001, the Department of Defense launched a STARS
vehicle from KLC; however, the rocket was deliberately destroyed over
open ocean almost immediately because it lost communication with KLC.
The STARS program provides ballistic missile targets to test various
sensors and ground-based interceptors. STARS vehicles will include
first- and second-stage Polaris A3 boosters and a third-stage Orbus-1
booster. The range of this system is 620 to 3,418 miles (998 to 5500
km).
The seventh launch from KLC, of the STARS IFT 13C, occurred on
December 14, 2004. SLMs were set to highlight sounds exceeding 70 dB
and were deployed by ENRI only at Narrow Cape (because sea lions were
not present at Ugak Island) eight hours before the launch. Narrow Cape
is significantly closer to the launch site than Ugak Island. The
recorded sound levels at Narrow Cape were higher for this launch than
for previous launches, which is likely due to a different trajectory
and local atmospheric conditions. Recorded maximum SPLs resulting from
rocket motor noise at Narrow Cape were 105.2 dB, with a peak level of
128.8 dB, and a corresponding SEL of 114.3 dB. The bulk of the sound
energy was at low frequencies and generally less than 2000 Hz. There
were over three hundred exceedance events above 70 dB at Narrow Cape
within the eighteen hours of recording, two of which can be attributed
to helicopter noise and the other to the rocket launch. With the
exception of helicopter noise and the rocket launch, all exceedances at
or just above 70 dB can be connected to weather-related noise (wind and
rain).
Rocket noise measurements for the STARS IFT 14 rocket launch on
February 13, 2005, the eighth rocket launched from KLC, were not
recorded, though most likely they would be similar to those measured
during the STAR IFT 13C launch.
Comments and Responses
On October 29, 2004 (69 FR 63114), NMFS published a notice of
proposed rulemaking on AADC's request to take marine mammals incidental
to rocket launches at KLC and requested comments, information and
suggestions concerning the request. During the 45-day public comment
period, NMFS received comments from three members of the public and the
MMC. The MMC supports NMFS' intent to implement incidental take
regulations for the AADC's activities at KLC provided that the
mitigation and monitoring activities described in the AADC application
for regulations are incorporated into the proposal.
Comment 1: The MMC noted that harbor seals and other marine mammals
occur in the vicinity of KLC and recommended that NMFS consider
providing additional coverage to the applicant by authorizing take of
harbor seals and other marine mammals to reduce the possibility that
the applicant may engage in an impermissible taking.
Response: After reviewing available information regarding the
abundance, distribution, and behavior of marine mammals around KLC and
consulting with AADC, NMFS has included authorization for the take of
harbor seals in this final rule. NMFS determined, however, that no
other marine mammals were likely to be taken by the rocket launches,
and, therefore, AADC has not been authorized for the take of any other
marine mammal species.
Comment 2: The MMC recommended that AADC contact the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) to determine if authorization for the
incidental taking of small numbers of sea otters is needed.
Response: AADC is consulting with the USFWS regarding potential
take of sea otters.
Comment 3: The MMC further recommended that the proposed monitoring
program be expanded to determine the effects on harbor seals, sea
otters, and other marine mammal species to determine if authorizations
for these species are needed or, if authorization to take these species
is provided, to verify that the impacts on the affected stocks are
negligible.
Response: As take of harbor seals is authorized under this rule,
comprehensive requirements for the monitoring of harbor seals are now
included. Additionally, AADC is required to report sightings of any
marine mammals seen during aerial surveys or on videotapes.
Comment 4: One commenter expressed strong objections to the rocket
launch facility and asserted that it was damaging to the ecosystem and
a waste of money.
Response: These regulations do not authorize AADC's rocket launch
activities, because such authorization is not within the jurisdiction
of the Secretary. Rather, these regulations authorize the unintentional
incidental take of marine mammals in connection with this activity and
prescribe methods of taking and other means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species and their habitat,
and on the availability of the species for subsistence uses. Thus, the
comment is outside of the scope of this rulemaking.
Comment 5: Another commenter also objected forcefully to the
project (see response to Comment 4, above) and further asserted that
there is no reason to allow this killing of marine mammals. This
commenter also expressed doubt in the accuracy of the measured noise
levels at the site.
Response: Section 101(a)(5)(A) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) states that the Secretary shall allow
the incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and regulations are issued. NMFS has determined that
this activity will take only small numbers of marine mammals, that the
taking will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks,
and that the activity will not have an unmitigable adverse effect on
the availablility of the species or stock for subsistence uses. NMFS
has also set forth permissible methods of taking, means of effecting
the least practicable adverse effect on the species or stock, and
requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking.
Therefore, NMFS has promulgated these regulations and will issue the
authorization.
The sound measurements reported from Ugak Island are similar in
level to those reported at other launch sites. If information were
provided to NMFS that suggested AADC's sound measurements were
incorrect, NMFS would investigate. The rule includes the following
requirement: ``In coordination and compliance with the Alaska Aerospace
Development Corporation, the National Marine Fisheries Service may
place an observer on Kodiak or Ugak Islands for any marine mammal
monitoring activity prior to, during, or after a missile launch to
monitor impacts on marine mammals, provided observers are not within
the calculated
[[Page 4302]]
danger zone of the rocket's flight path during a launch.''
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
The KLC is located on the southeast facing tip of a small peninsula
on the eastern side of Kodiak Island. The rocket launch site is
approximately one mile (1.6 km) from the southeast shore (Narrow Cape).
The primary KLC environmental monitoring study area, and area of
anticipated effects, was set in September 1996 at a meeting between
AADC and representatives of the USFWS, NMFS, the FAA, and ENRI. The
area was chosen based on modeled ASELs and includes the lands and
waters within a 6-mile (9.7-km) radius extending out from the KLC
launchpad. The only marine mammal haulouts within this area are on Ugak
Island.
Ugak Island is a triangular-shaped island located about 3.5 miles
(5.6 km) southeast of the launch site. The north side of Ugak island
culminates in a sandy spit on the west end where most of the sea lions
haul out, though some also haul out at the southern tip of the island.
The southeastern facing side of the island, where most of the harbor
seals haul out, is very rocky, backed by 300-ft (91-km) cliffs (or
higher), and is subject to very strong wave action. The west side of
the island is steeper than the north side, but not as steep as the
east, but does not appear to be used much by either pinniped.
Narrow Cape, Ugak Island, and the adjacent waters within the
primary KLC study area provide habitat for sea otters, harbor seals,
Steller sea lions (listed as endangered), gray whales, humpback whales
(listed as endangered), northern fur seals, northern right whales, and
minke whales. Harbor seals and sea otters are common year-round, as are
killer whales, Dall's porpoise, and harbor porpoise. Other species of
cetaceans that may occur in the area, such as Pacific white-sided
dolphins, Risso's dolphins, northern right whale dolphins, pilot
whales, Cuvier's beaked whales, Baird's beaked whale, Stegneger's
beaked whale, sperm whales, fin whales, sei whales and blue whales are
rare as they are primarily pelagic (ENRI, 1995-98). General information
on harbor seals and other marine mammal species can be found in Angliss
and Lodge (2004), which are available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Stock_Assessment_Program/sars.html.
Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) are managed by the USFWS. Information on
this species may be found at www.fws.gov. Please refer to those
documents and the application for further information on these species.
Steller Sea Lions
The Steller sea lion is described by two stocks - those west of
144[deg] W. long. listed as endangered under the ESA, and the eastern
stock listed as threatened under the ESA. Sea lions hauled out on Ugak
Island, the northern spit of which is designated as critical habitat
for this species, are of the western stock. The most recent
comprehensive estimate (pups and non-pups) of Steller sea lion
abundance in Alaska is based on aerial surveys of non-pups in June 2002
and ground based pup counts in June and early July of 2001 and 2002.
Data from these surveys represents actual counts at all major rookeries
and haulouts. The best available minimum population estimate for the
western stock of Steller sea lions is the sum of the total number of
non-pups counted in 2002 (26,602) and the number of pups counted in
2001 and 2002 (9,211), which is 34,779 (Angliss and Lodge, 2004). This
is considered a minimum estimate because it has not been corrected to
account for animals which were at sea during the surveys. Though non-
pup numbers increased 5.5-13.7 percent from 2000-2002, the 2002 count
was still 5.4 percent below the 1998 count and 36.7 percent below the
1990 count and the long-term, average decline for 1990-02 is 4.3
percent per year (Angliss and Lodge, 2004).
On Ugak Island sea lions haul out primarily on the northern-most
sand spit of the island, but also less frequently on the east/south
side of the island. These haulouts are occupied primarily from late
June to early October. Opportunistic counts of Steller sea lions
conducted at Ugak Island every year since 1993 indicate a maximum of
over 350 animals in the fall of 1997 and a steady decrease in numbers
to less than 40 since 2001 (Kate Wynne, pers. comm, 2005). Two of the 8
launches have occurred during times when sea lions are typically
present, during September of 1999, 60-70 sea lions were seen, and
during September of 2001, no sea lions were present on the days before
and after the launch.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Harbor seals live in the Pacific Ocean from Baja California in
Mexico northward to the Aleutian Islands of Alaska. The population is
not listed as ``endangered'' or ``threatened'' under the ESA; nor is
this species listed as ``depleted'' or as a ``strategic stock'' under
the MMPA. Harbor seals are primarily non-migratory and the seals around
KLC are considered part of the Gulf of Alaska stock, which occurs from
Cape Suckling to Unimak Pass, including animals throughout the Aleutian
Islands. The most recent comprehensive aerial survey of harbor seals in
Alaska were conducted in 1994 and 1996. When a correction factor is
used to account for animals that were in the water during the counts, a
minimum population estimate of this stock of harbor seals is 28,917
(Angliss and Lodge, 2004). The Kodiak Island population is estimated to
have increased 7.2 percent annually from 1992-1996 (Angliss and Lodge,
2004) and survey data from 1992-2004 shows an even steeper increase at
Ugak Island (Wynne, per. Comm., 2005), though numbers throughout the
Gulf of Alaska are still lower than they were in the 1970s and 1980s.
Harbor seals are present on Ugak Island year round. They are found
primarily on the east/south side of the island, backed by high, steep
cliffs, but they also sometimes haul out on the north side of the
island and on the rock croppings on the north and east sides of the
island. Harbor seal pupping occurs on both Ugak between the middle of
May and June. Yearly harbor seal counts at Ugak Island taken in August
since 1992 show a steady increase from approximately 200 animals in
1992 to over 900 in 2004 (Wynne, pers. Comm., 2005). Surveys conducted
in 1993 and 1994 found 88 and 96 harbor seal pups, respectively (AADC
1996).
Northern Fur Seals
The northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) occurs offshore of the
KLC site near the continental shelf break from January through April.
Because of the distance from the launch site and the fact that they
will be swimming through and not stopping (see Cetaceans, below), NMFS
believes it unlikely that fur seals will be affected by the launch
noise and they will not be addressed further.
Cetaceans
As noted, several species of cetaceans occupy the waters around
KLC. However, airborne noise is generally reflected at the sea surface
outside of a 26[deg] cone extending down from an airborne source
(Richardson et al., 1995). Submerged animals would have to be directly
under the noise sources before they could hear it, and, approximately
70 seconds after launch, a typical launch vehicle would be more than 8
miles (12.9 km) high. Underwater acoustic transmissions are complex,
and affected by the level and frequency of noise, sea state and other
surface conditions, and water depth. Given the
[[Page 4303]]
specific area, within a specific short time that a cetacean would need
to be traveling through surface/or close to surface water to be exposed
to rocket noise and the measured rocket sound levels and the
attenuation that would occur before the noise reached deeper waters,
NMFS believes it unlikely that any cetaceans will be impacted by the
rocket noise.
Potential Effects of Rocket Launches on Marine Mammals
As outlined in several previous NMFS documents, the effects of
noise on marine mammals are highly variable, and can be categorized as
follows (based on Richardson et al., 1995):
(1) The noise may be too weak to be heard at the location of the
pinniped (i.e., lower than the prevailing ambient noise level, the
hearing threshold of the animal at relevant frequencies, or both);
(2) The noise may be audible but not strong enough to elicit any
overt behavioral response;
(3) The noise may elicit reactions of variable conspicuousness and
variable relevance to the well being of the pinniped; these can range
from temporary alert responses to active avoidance reactions such as
stampedes into the sea from terrestrial haulout sites;
(4) Upon repeated exposure, pinnipeds may exhibit diminishing
responsiveness (habituation), or disturbance effects may persist; the
latter is most likely with sounds that are highly variable in
characteristics, infrequent and unpredictable in occurrence (as are
vehicle launches), and associated with situations that the pinniped
perceives as a threat;
(5) Any anthropogenic noise that is strong enough to be heard has
the potential to reduce (mask) the ability of pinnipeds to hear natural
sounds at similar frequencies, including calls from conspecifics, and
environmental sounds such as surf noise;
(6) If mammals remain in an area because it is important for
feeding, breeding or some other biologically important purpose even
though there is chronic exposure to noise, it is possible that there
could be noise-induced physiological stress; this might (in turn) have
negative effects on the well-being or reproduction of the animals
involved; and
(7) Very strong sounds have the potential to cause temporary or
permanent reduction in hearing sensitivity. In terrestrial mammals, and
presumably marine mammals, received sound levels must far exceed the
animal's hearing threshold for there to be any temporary threshold
shift (TTS). For transient sounds, the sound level necessary to cause
TTS is inversely related to the duration of the sound. Received sound
levels must be even higher for there to be risk of permanent hearing
impairment. In addition, intense acoustic or explosive events may cause
trauma to tissues associated with organs vital for hearing, sound
production, respiration, and other functions. This trauma may include
minor to severe hemorrhage.
Solid rocket boosters from KLC launches will fall into the ocean
away from any known or potential haul-out sites and do not pose any
measurable threat to marine mammals. Launch noise is expected to occur
over the coastal habitats of Narrow Cape and Ugak Island during every
launch, while sonic booms will occur approximately 40 nm (74 km)
downrange over open ocean, beyond the outer continental shelf, and are
unlikely to affect marine mammals. Airborne launch sounds will mostly
reflect or refract from the water surface and, except for sounds within
a diameter of approximately 26 degrees directly below the launch
vehicle, will not penetrate into the water column. The sounds that do
penetrate will not persist in the water for more than a few seconds.
The primary sea lion haulout on Ugak Island is a spit facing KLC,
and animals at this location would likely hear a rocket launch. Steller
sea lions generally occupy this haulout from late summer to the early
fall post-breeding period (late June to early October), historically by
up to several hundred sea lions. Small numbers of harbor seals may haul
out on the eastern end of the shoreline that extends from the spit.
Harbor seals and, less frequently sea lions, also haul out on the
southeast side of Ugak Island, but this area is sheltered from direct
sight of and sound from KLC by a 300-ft (91.4-m) island cliff and,
because it receives heavy surf, it already has high ambient noise
levels. Because background ambient noise often interferes with or masks
the ability of an animal to detect a sound even when that sound is
above its absolute hearing threshold (Richardson et al., 1995), it
seems unlikely that animals hauled out at this location would hear
noise associated with rocket launches from KLC.
Past Monitoring Results at KLC
ENRI was tasked under contract to the AADC to conduct environmental
monitoring studies for rocket launches from KLC. In addition to
collecting rocket noise data on the northern spit of Ugak Island, ENRI
conducted aerial surveys over and collected real-time video footage at
the seasonally occupied northern spit haulout site in conjunction with
the three KLC launches when Steller sea lions might have been present
at the haulout: ait-1 on November 5, 1998; ait-2 on September 15, 1999;
and Athena on September 29, 2001. The only time Steller sea lions were
observed occupying the haulout was during the ait-2 launch monitoring
period. Sixty to seventy animals were on the haulout about 5 hours pre-
launch. Due to below freezing temperatures, the video system shut off
about 4 hours prior to the ait-2 launch. The video data show Steller
sea lions fighting or sleeping on the haulout, and then suddenly
stampeding into the water and milling about immediately offshore. The
cause of the stampede is not apparent in the video and no stimulus
could be linked to the response (from the noise recordings or
otherwise). When, or if, any of the Steller sea lions returned to the
haulout before the ait-2 launch is unknown. Although sea lions may have
returned to the rocks and fled the haulout again as a result of rocket
noise, a clear-cut stimulus response of sea lion behavior to rocket
noise cannot be postulated without video data from the time of the
launch. Approximately 1 hour after the rocket was launched, no sea
lions were seen hauled out and 50 to 60 sea lions were observed in the
water immediately offshore. The day after the launch, 60 to 70 animals
were seen hauled out at the same spot. Some of these animals could be
the same ones that were flushed from the haulout the day before though
they could also be different animals. Though sea lions have been shown
to acclimate to disturbance from rocket launches at other spaceports
(Thorson and Francine, 1999), it is unlikely that this is the case at
KLC considering the infrequency of launches. Alternatively,
approximately 280 harbor seals were seen at two locations on the east
side of the island (next to the 300-ft (91-m) cliffs) during the aerial
survey flown 5 hours pre-launch. During the one hour post-launch aerial
overflight, the same number of harbor seals were hauled out at the same
locations, which would suggest that they did not flush into the water,
which would further suggest that the sound was blocked or masked by the
high cliffs and high ambient noise on that side of the island. Though
it is possible that the harbor seals were flushed into the water and
then quickly hauled out again before the post-flight aerial survey, it
seems unlikely considering that harbor seals are typically
significantly more sensitive to
[[Page 4304]]
noise than sea lions and the sea lions were still in the water.
Unlike at the ait-2 launch discussed above, no Steller sea lions
were present at the Ugak Island haulout during the ait-1 and Athena
launches and it was not possible to relate any behavioral responses to
the recorded noise levels. Harbor seals were present at the other two
launches, but monitoring was not required and the surveys were not
conducted immediately before and after the launch and could not
establish a stimulus response to the rocket launch. For all launches,
however, launch noises recorded at the haulout site were within the
audible ranges of pinnipeds (Richardson et al., 1995) and both Steller
sea lions and harbor seals would have heard them had they been present.
Further, recorded sound pressures were at, and sometimes above, levels
known to occasionally induce startle responses in pinnipeds (Richardson
et al., 1995). Rocket launches will present Steller sea lions and
harbor seals with novel visual and possibly tactile stimuli as well as
unusually loud sounds and bright lights from the burning rocket and
white exhaust flume.
Steller Sea Lions
The behavioral data record for Steller sea lions is small
throughout the North Pacific range and typically is focused on
reproductive behaviors. In general, studies have shown that responses
of pinnipeds on beaches to acoustic disturbance arising from rocket and
target missile launches are highly variable. This variability may be
due to many factors, including species, age class, and time of year.
Porter (1997) observed Steller sea lions fleeing into the water for a
wide variety of reasons such as helicopter overflights, bird flybys,
and the presence of nearby humans. He also noted sea lions stampedes
into the water that could not be correlated with any observed stimulus.
There is also evidence that both time of day and temperature alter the
probability of entry into the water (animals are more likely to enter
the water when already overheated) (Bowles, 2000). Steller sea lions
have been seen to mill about just offshore with their heads up in a
heightened state of watchfulness (Porter, 1997) and remain close to the
haulout until they sense it is safe to go back ashore (Lockheed Martin
Environmental Services, 1999).
Noise generated from aircraft and helicopter activities associated
with the launches may provide a potential secondary source of
incidental harassment, and the physical presence of aircraft or
biologists could also lead to non-acoustic effects on marine mammals
involving visual or other cues. However, other disturbance-related data
collected during the ait-2 study (ENRI, 2000) does not fit well with
stimulus response data from other sources. Sea lions are widely thought
to be intolerant of helicopter noise (Porter, 1997), yet the animals in
question did not appear to respond to multiple exposures of more
intense helicopter noise at Ugak Island than that from the rocket
(ENRI, 2000). They are also thought to be intolerant of humans on foot,
yet a video from the ait-2 study shows hauled-out sea lions on Ugak
Island undisturbed by biologists actively engaged in work within 328 ft
(100 m) of them. The Ugak Island haulout is also regularly exposed to
disturbances from aircraft and fishing vessels transiting Narrow
Strait.
Recent studies (Lawson et al., 2002, and NAWS, 2002) suggest that
Level B harassment, as evidenced by beach flushing, will sometimes
occur upon exposure to launch sounds with ASEL's of 100 dBA (re 20
micro-Pa\2\ -sec) or higher. It is expected that most received noise
levels at Ugak Island would be at levels which are likely to cause a
temporary disturbance. The infrequent (up to nine times per year) and
brief (no more than one minute as heard from Ugak Island) nature of
these sounds that would result from a rocket launch would cause masking
for not more than a very small fraction of the time during any single
launch day and it is unlikely that pinnipeds will become habituated to
launch sounds. In addition, the extremely rapid departure of the
rockets means that pinnipeds would be exposed to increased sound levels
for very short time intervals, and because launches are conducted
relatively infrequently, neither physiological stress nor hearing
related injuries are likely. Therefore, NMFS anticipates that the
effects of rocket launches from KLC would have no significant effects
on the abilities of sea lions to hear one another or to detect natural
environmental sounds, and would have no more than a negligible impact
on Steller sea lion populations.
Harbor Seals
An ongoing scientific research program has been conducted since
1997 to determine the long-term cumulative impacts of space vehicle
launches on the haul-out behavior, population dynamics and hearing
acuity of harbor seals at Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) in
California. The response of harbor seals to rocket launch noise
depended on the intensity of the noise (dependent on the size of the
vehicle and its proximity) and the age of the seal. The percentage of
seals leaving the haul-out increases with noise level up to
approximately 100 dB ASEL, after which almost all seals leave, although
recent data has shown that an increasing percentage of seals have
remained on shore, and those that remain are adults (Thorson et al.,
1999). Given the high degree of site fidelity among harbor seals, it is
likely that those seals that remained on the haul-out site during
rocket launches had previously been exposed to launches; that is, it is
possible that adult seals have become acclimated to the launch noise
and react differently than the younger inexperienced seals. The louder
the launch noise, the longer it took for seals to begin returning to
the haulout site and for the numbers to return to pre-launch levels. In
two past Athena IKONOS launches with ASELs of 107.3 and 107.8 dB at the
closest haulout site, seals began to haulout again approximately 16-55
minutes post-launch (Thorson et al., 1999). In contrast, noise levels
from an Atlas launch and several Titan II launches had ASELs ranging
from 86.7 to 95.7 dB at the closest haulout, and seals began to return
to the haulout within 2-8 minutes post-launch. Seals returned to the
haulouts within 2 to 55 minutes of the launch disturbance, and the
haulout usually returned to pre-launch levels within 45 to 120 minutes.
In addition to behavioral disturbance, loud sounds may also cause
TTS, which is a slight, recoverable loss of hearing. In order to
further determine if harbor seals experience any change in their
hearing sensitivity as a result of launch noise, researchers conducted
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing on 10 harbor seals prior to,
and after, the launches of 3 Titan IV rockets (one of the loudest
launch vehicles at the south VAFB haul-out site). Detailed analysis of
the changes in waveform latency and waveform replication of the ABR
measurements showed that there were no detectable changes in the seals'
hearing sensitivity as a result of the launch noise (SRS Technologies,
2001).
The launches at VAFB do not appear to have had long-term effects on
the harbor seal population in this area. The total population of harbor
seals at VAFB is estimated to be 1,040 animals and has been increasing
at an annual rate of 12.6 percent. Since 1997, there have been 5 to 7
space vehicle launches per year and there appears to be only short-term
disturbance effects to harbor seals as a result of launch noise (SRS
Technologies, 2001). Harbor seals will temporarily leave their haul-out
when exposed to launch noise; however they generally return to the
haul-out within one hour.
[[Page 4305]]
Harbor seals use Ugak Island as a pupping site. Though no launches
have as yet taken place during the pupping period at Ugak Island (late
May through mid-June), they may at some point in the future. There has
been little systematic study of the reactions of pinnipeds to rocket
launches or aircraft overflights during pupping periods. Pinnipeds
hauled out for pupping or molting are generally the most responsive to
aircraft overflights (Richardson et al., 1995). Harbor seals often
leave beaches when aircraft fly over and then sometimes haulout at a
different site afterwards, which results in permanent separation if
pups are unable to follow their mothers into the water. Additionally,
very young pups that are pushed into the water as the adults flush may
subsequently drown. One study showed more than 10 percent of
approximately 2000 pups born on one Alaskan island died as a result of
disturbance from low-flying aircraft (Richardson et al., 1995). The
same study found that aircraft were more disturbing on calm days, when
at low altitudes, and after recent disturbances. Since harbor seals
have been shown to flush into the water in response to rocket launch
noise of a level similar to that occurring at Ugak Island, one can
infer that separation of pups from their mothers could occur if the
launch occurred during a pupping period and the harbor seals were using
the north side of the island to pup on.
Rocket launches at KLC have associated security overflights that
occur an approximate total of 5 to 10 times per day in the days
preceding and following the launch. Several studies of both harbor
seals and Steller sea lions cited in Richardson et al., 2005, suggest
that these animals respond significantly less to overflights of both
planes and helicopters that occur above 305 m (0.2 mi). One mitigation
requirement included in the rule is that security overflights
immediately associated with the launch will not approach occupied
pinniped haulouts on Ugak Island by closer than 0.25 mile (0.4 km), and
will maintain a vertical distance of 1000 ft (305 m) from the haulouts
when within 0.5 miles (0.8 km), unless indications of human presence or
activity warrant closer inspection of the area to assure that national
security interests are protected in accord with law. Monitoring flights
will not approach closer than 0.25 (0.4 km) mile from the island. It is
unlikely that either of these overflights will add noticeably to any
harassment of pinnipeds surrounding the rocket launches.
Harbor seals primarily use the east side of Ugak Island, though
they sometimes use the north side of the island both for hauling out
and for pupping. For several reasons, NMFS believes that the seals
using the east side of the island are not likely to be harassed by
rocket launch noise: the eastern shoreline faces away from the point
the rocket noise is emanating from and is backed up by a 300-500-ft
(91.4-152.4 km) cliff; the rough seas hitting rocks make the ambient
noise very loud on the eastern shoreline; and data collected during the
ait-2 launch showed that one hour after the launch, when sea lions were
swimming immediately off the rocks on the north shore, the harbor seals
were still hauled out in the same numbers and at the same locations
that they were 5 hours before the launch. NMFS believes that harbor
seals hauled out on the north beach may be temporarily behaviorally
disturbed and possibly temporarily displaced from their haulouts
immediately following rocket launches. If launches occur during the
harbor seal pupping period and harbor seals have also chosen to pup on
the north beach, it is possible that harbor seal pups could die as a
result of the adults flushing in response to the rocket noise. NMFS
believes that the proposed action may result in the temporary
behavioral disturbance and, less likely, mortality (pups only) of small
numbers, in relation to the population numbers (see next section), of
harbor seals. NMFS anticipates that these impacts will have no more
than a negligible effect on the species stock.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Taken by Harassment
The highest number of Steller sea lions seen at one time on Ugak
Island since 1993 is approximately 375 (1997). However, based on both
dedicated and opportunistic surveys by one researcher, approximately
160 were seen in 1999 and numbers have decreased since then (Wynne,
pers. comm., 2005). Approximately 50 were seen in 2001 and numbers have
further decreased since then. Steller sea lions seasonally use the Ugak
island sites (the northern spit, and occasionally the southwest tip) as
haulout sites from late June to early October. While not logistically
optimal for the applicant, the fastest that KLC can prepare the
facilities for a new launch right after a launch is 4 weeks, which
means that at most it would be logistically possible to have four
launches a year within the time that the sea lions are using Ugak
Island as a haulout. Based on the maximum number seen and the sea lion
trend over the last several years, NMFS anticipates that the most sea
lions likely to be harassed during one launch is 300. This translates
to the potential harassment of 1,200 Steller sea lions in one year
(assuming different individual sea lions are harassed each launch).
However a mitigation measure is required that will limit the number of
launches within the time that sea lions are present to three, which
lowers the number of potential harassments to 900 animals annually.
This is a small number relative to the affected stock.
Harbor seal numbers have steadily increased at Ugak Island since
1992, and just over 900 were counted during the molt in 2004 (Wynne,
pers. comm., 2005). The last pupping season counts showed 290 adults
and 88 pups in 1993, and 292 adults and 96 pups in 1994. According to
local researchers, the primary haulout for harbor seals is on the east
side of the island (where NMFS does not believe there are likely to be
any effects from the rocket launch noise) and the majority of the seals
may be found there. In three days of her 1994 survey, Wynne (2005)
found that an average of approximately 25 percent of both adults and
pups were hauled out on the north side of the beach. Therefore, NMFS
estimates that of a maximum of 900 harbor seals present during any
launch, 275 of them may be located on the north side of the island and
exposed to the rocket launch noise. Harbor seals are present at Ugak
all year, which means that if there were nine launches in one year, a
maximum of 2,475 harbor seals could be exposed to the noise and
potentially harassed in one year (assuming different individuals were
present each launch, else the number is smaller, but some may be
harassed more than one time). The harbor seal pupping season runs from
mid-May through June. Since it takes a minimum of 4 weeks to prepare
for a new launch, it would be logistically possible to have two
launches during that time. The highest number of pups seen at Ugak was
96 in 1994. Though numbers of pups have probably increased with the
numbers of adults since 1994 (by a factor of three), only a minority of
pups (estimated one fourth) will likely be present on the north side of
the island and exposed to the noise and potential flushing of adults.
One scientist reported that more than 10 percent of 2000 harbor seal
pups died on an Alaskan Island following disturbance from exposures to
low flying aircrafts (Richardson et al., 1995). NMFS estimates that if
72 pups (highest number seen (in 1996) multiplied by three for
population increase and divided by four to account for number exposed
on north side of island) were
[[Page 4306]]
twice exposed to rocket noise sufficient to flush the adults, up to 20
harbor seal pups (15 percent) might die. However, one required
mitigation measure limits AADC to one launch during the pupping season,
which lowers the potential mortality of harbor seal pups to 11 annually
(55 over the life of the regulations). NMFS believes that a small
number (no more than 2,488) of harbor seals may be affected relative to
the population estimates.
Effects of Rocket Launches on Subsistence Needs
There are no subsistence uses of pinniped species in Alaska waters
within the KLC primary study area, and, therefore, NMFS anticipates no
effects on subsistence needs.
Effects of Rocket Launches on Marine Mammal Habitat
Solid rocket boosters would fall into the ocean away from any known
or potential haulouts and the chances of a cetacean being in the wrong
place at the wrong time are discountable. All sonic booms that reach
the earth's surface would be expected to be over open ocean beyond the
outer continental shelf. Airborne launch sounds would mostly reflect or
refract from the water surface and, except for sounds within a diameter
of approximately 26 degrees directly below the launch vehicle, would
not penetrate into the water column. The sounds that do penetrate would
not persist in the water for more than a few seconds. Overall, rocket
launch activities from KLC would not be expected to cause any impacts
to habitats used by marine mammals, including pinniped haulouts, or to
their food sources.
Mitigation
Under Section 101(a)(5) of the MMPA, adverse impacts are to be
reduced to the lowest level practicable. Due to the nature of the
rocket launches and the pinnipeds responses, the most obvious way to
mitigate for the effects of the rocket launch noise is to minimize the
number of launches that the Steller sea lions and harbor seals are
exposed to. This sort of mitigation is logistically difficult and
impracticable for AADC, as their launch operations are driven by the
needs of the agencies and companies that utilize their facilities.
However, NMFS and the applicant have worked out a way to reduce the
potential Level B Harassment of sea lions by 25 percent and to reduce
the potential Level A Harassment or mortality of harbor seal pups by 50
percent.
In their application, AADC asked for authorization to take marine
mammals during nine rocket launches annually. The quickest that the
launch pad can be turned around for another launch is four weeks. This
means that it would be logistically possible to launch 4 rockets during
the season that the Steller sea lions are using Ugak Island, and
logistically possible to launch two rockets during the harbor seal
pupping season. As a mitigation measure, NMFS has incorporated into the
rule and LOAs a requirement that not more than an average of three
launches per year could occur within the sea lion season, and not more
than an average of one launch per year could occur during the harbor
seal pupping season. Therefore, no more than 15 launches would occur
within the sea lion season (June 15 - September 30) over the course of
the 5-year rule, and no more than 5 launches would occur during the
harbor seal pupping season (May 15 - June 30) over the course of the 5-
year rule.
Even though the video monitoring of Steller sea lions at Ugak
Island indicates they did not flush in response to helicopter or noise
recorded during the same time period, the scientific literature shows
that pinnipeds will often have an adverse response to low-flying
aircraft. AADC typically flies several security overflights in
conjunction with a rocket launch. As a result, NMFS has incorporated a
mitigation measure wherein the security flights immediately associated
with rocket launches would not approach closer than 0.25 mile (0.4 km)
to occupied pinniped haulout sites or fly lower than 1000 ft (305 m)
when the plane is closer than 0.5 miles (0.8 km) from occupied pinniped
sites on Ugak Island unless indications of human presence or activity
warrant closer inspection of the area to assure that national security
interests are protected in accord with law.
Monitoring
Marine Mammal Monitoring
The objective of monitoring Steller sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals is to detect any indications of pinniped disturbance, injury, or
mortality that results from KLC rocket launches at the Ugak Island
haulout site. Monitoring would be conducted on Ugak Island for launches
that take place between June 15 and September 30, an observation period
that includes the seasonal occupation of the Steller sea lions as well
as the molting period of the harbor seals (when their numbers are
higher and their responses to disturbance potentially greater).
Launches occurring during the harbor seal pupping season (May 15 - June
30) would also be monitored. All haulout areas on Ugak Island would be
monitored before, during, and after launch operations to document and
characterize any observed responses. Monitoring would be designed to
determine the type of reactions (or injury or mortality) and their
relationship to noises associated with rocket launches. Fixed-wing
aerial surveys would be flown for any launches taking place from June
15 through September 30 using a minimum flight altitude of 156 m (500
ft) above sea level (ASL) to be flown at low tide or, with
consultation, toward evening. The aircraft would come no closer than
0.25 miles (0.4 km) to the haulout. Depending on aircraft availability,
one or two NMFS-approved biologist observers would accompany the pilot.
Data will be gathered both visually and with a camera having a zoom
lens. A total of five surveys would be flown, if weather conditions
permit. The first would occur the day prior to a scheduled launch and
the second as soon after the launch as possible. Replicate surveys will
be flown the following three successive days to determine post-launch
haulout-use patterns.
For any launches that occur from June 15 through September 30, a
real-time video record will be made of sea lion reactions to launch-
related noises. This will be accomplished by the installation of a
remote custom-designed, closed-circuit, weatherproof, time-lapse video
camera system at the base of the Ugak Island sea lion haulout before a
launch, which will be retrieved post-launch. Results of the aerial and
video surveys will be compared, providing information on startle
effects and durations. In addition, video data will be time-correlated
with rocket motor noise measurements to provide objective information
on any startle responses or indications of disturbance reactions that
may occur resulting from rocket launches. Comparisons will also be made
with baseline data assembled by AADC to help gauge any natural trends
that may be occurring.
The majority of harbor seals haul out on the eastern side of Ugak
Island, which is completely inaccessible to pedestrian or boat traffic
due to the high cliffs and violent surf, so it is not possible to set
up video recorders there. However, approximately 25 percent of the
harbor seals haul out on the eastern end of the north-facing shore of
Ugak Island. Though it has not yet been attempted, it may be possible
to set up a camera with a zoom lens on the accessible western end of
the north-facing shore to record harbor seal behavior on the middle or
eastern end
[[Page 4307]]
of the shore, or on the rocks off shore. At some time prior to the
first launch that occurs between May 15 and June 30, when harbor seals
are present (perhaps immediately before or after the camera has already
been set up to record sea lions), AADC will test the efficacy of using
the camera on the harbor seal haulout and report their findings to
NMFS. If successful, the same real-time video and acoustic measurements
(see below) will be conducted when launches occur during the harbor
seal pupping season as occur when the sea lions are present.
NMFS believes it unlikely that the security overflights immediately
preceding and following the rocket launches would result in the
harassment of marine mammals. However, when pinnipeds are present at
haulouts during security overflights associated with rocket launches, a
member of the flight crew will note and record whether pinnipeds
appeared to flush as a result of the overflight and estimate a number.
Acoustic Measurements
Rocket