Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Peanut Crop Insurance Provisions, 4056-4061 [E6-855]
Download as PDF
4056
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Parts 56 and 57
7 CFR Part 457
[Docket No. PY–02–003]
RIN 0563–AB97
RIN 0581–AC25
Common Crop Insurance Regulations,
Peanut Crop Insurance Provisions
Update Administrative Requirements
for Voluntary Shell Egg, Poultry, and
Rabbit Grading
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects the
ADDRESSES section of the proposed rule
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
published in the Federal Register on
January 13, 2006, regarding Voluntary
Shell Egg, Poultry, and Rabbit Grading.
This correction clarifies that comments
may be submitted electronically to an email address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles L. Johnson, Chief, Grading
Branch, (202) 720–3271.
Correction
In the proposed rule FR Doc. E6–258,
published January 13, 2006, (71 FR
2168) make the following correction. On
page 2168, in the first column,
information appearing in the ADDRESSES
section is corrected to read as follows:
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
David Bowden, Jr., Chief,
Standardization Branch, Poultry
Programs, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
STOP 0259, Room 3944-South, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0259. Also,
comments may be faxed to (202) 690–
0941. Comments should be submitted in
duplicate. Comments may also be
submitted electronically to:
AMSPYDockets@usda.gov or https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should refer to Docket No. PY–02–003
and note the date and page number of
this issue of the Federal Register. All
comments received will be made
available for public inspection at the
above location during regular business
hours. Comments received also will be
made available in the rulemaking
section of the AMS Web site https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rulemaking. A copy
of this proposed rule may be found at
https://www.ams.usda.gov/poultry/
regulations/.
Dated: January 19, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–905 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:40 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend
the Common Crop Insurance
Regulations, Peanut Crop Insurance
Provisions to remove all references to
quota and non-quota peanuts and add
provisions that will allow coverage for
peanuts whether or not they are under
contract with a sheller to better meet the
needs of insured producers. The
changes will apply for the 2007 and
succeeding crop years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business March 27, 2006
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final. Comments on
information collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 must
be received on or before March 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments to
the Director, Product Development
Division, Risk Management Agency,
United States Department of
Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop
0812, Room 421, Kansas City, MO
64133–4676. Comments titled ‘‘Peanut
Crop Provisions’’ may be sent via the
Internet to
DirectorPDD@rm.fcic.usda.gov, or the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. A
copy of each response will be available
for public inspection and copying from
7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., c.s.t., Monday
through Friday, except holidays, at the
above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Johnson, Risk Management Specialist,
Research and Development, Product
Development Division, Risk
Management Agency, at the Kansas City,
MO, address listed above, telephone
(816) 926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053 through November
30, 2007.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act (GPEA) Compliance
FCIC is committed to compliance
with the GPEA, which requires
Government agencies, in general, to
provide the public with the option of
submitting information or transacting
business electronically to the maximum
extent possible. FCIC requires that all
reinsured companies be in compliance
with the Freedom to E-File Act and
section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The
provisions of this rule will not have a
retroactive effect. The provisions of this
rule will preempt State and local laws
to the extent such State and local laws
are inconsistent herewith. With respect
to any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 and 7 CFR
part 400, subpart J for the informal
administrative review process of good
farming practices, as applicable, must be
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common
Crop Insurance Regulations; Peanut
Crop Insurance Provisions to remove all
references to quota and non-quota
peanuts because the Farm Security and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
Rural Investment Act of 2002 eliminated
the peanut quota program as
administered by the Farm Service
Agency (FSA). FCIC anticipated that
quotas could be eliminated years ago
and previously included provisions that
permitted guarantees to be based on the
actual production history of the
producer. This has allowed the program
to operate since 2002. However,
reference to quotas in the pricing
methodology and other provisions has
caused some confusion that will be
eliminated when references are
removed.
The proposed changes are as follows:
Section 1—Definitions—Add
definitions for ‘‘base contract price,’’
‘‘handler,’’ ‘‘harvest,’’ ‘‘marketing
association,’’ ‘‘price election,’’ ‘‘sheller,’’
and ‘‘sheller contract’’ since these terms
are required to provide insurance under
a sheller contract. To the maximum
extent practicable, these definitions will
be given the same meaning as similar
terms in other insured contracted crops.
Revise the definition of ‘‘farmers’ stock
peanuts’’ to specifically state farmer
stock peanuts have to be picked and
threshed. Revise the definition of
‘‘planted acreage’’ to recognize peanuts
are sometimes planted with two rows
close together followed by a space wide
enough to permit mechanical
cultivation followed by two rows
planted close together. This revision
allows peanut producers to cultivate
their peanuts in a manner recognized by
agriculture experts as a good farming
practice. Remove the definitions of
‘‘approved yield,’’ ‘‘county,’’ and
‘‘production guarantee (per acre)’’
because these definitions will now be
the same as the definitions in the Basic
Provisions. Remove the definitions of
‘‘average price per pound,’’ ‘‘average
support price per pound,’’ ‘‘CCC,’’
‘‘effective poundage marketing quota,’’
‘‘inspection certificate and sales
memorandum,’’ ‘‘non-quota peanuts,’’
‘‘quota peanuts,’’ ‘‘segregation I, II, or
III,’’ and ‘‘value per pound’’ because the
elimination of the peanut quotas make
these definitions no longer applicable to
the Crop Provisions.
Section 2—Revise section 2 to specify
that if the producer insures any peanuts
in accordance with a sheller contract all
of the producer’s peanut acreage in the
county will be considered one
enterprise unit. It is possible for
producers to have several sheller
contracts with different prices.
Requiring that all peanut acreage in the
county be included in one enterprise
unit prevents the producer from shifting
production from a unit with a higher
price to a unit with a lower price in
order to create or increase an indemnity.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4057
The producer must report all applicable
information separately by sheller
contract on the acreage report and any
claim forms. However, the information
for each contract will be aggregated to
obtain the total information for the unit.
This requirement for reporting
separately, and aggregating for the unit,
is also necessary if the producer has
both peanuts under a sheller contract
and non-contract peanuts in the same
unit.
Regardless of whether the peanuts are
covered by a sheller contract, if the
producer elects to insure all of the
peanuts in the county using the price
election provided by FCIC, the producer
will be eligible for unit division
(optional, basic, or enterprise) in
accordance with section 34 the Basic
Provisions if the requirements for such
units are met.
Section 3—Remove the references to
quota and non-quota peanuts, quota
price elections, and the effective
poundage marketing quota throughout
the section. FCIC is also proposing to
now cover peanuts under contract with
a sheller at the contract price. Currently,
there is only one price election
announced by FCIC that is applicable to
all peanuts but many producers claim to
receive a higher price for their peanuts
under contract with shellers. These
provisions will permit producers to
insure their peanuts at the contract
prices if all other conditions in the
policy are met. Producers will still have
the option to insure their peanuts that
are not covered by a sheller contract
under the FCIC announced price
election. Further, even if the peanuts are
covered by a sheller contract, the
producer can still elect to insure them
using the price election announced by
FCIC.
In section 3(a), FCIC also proposes to
revise the provisions to specify that the
price election percentage the producer
chooses for peanuts not insured using
the sheller contract price (which also
includes peanuts in excess of the
amount required to fulfill the producer’s
sheller contract) and for peanuts insured
using the sheller contract price must
have the same percentage relationship
to the maximum price election offered
by the FCIC. For example, if the
producer elects a 100 percent price
election percentage for peanuts insured
at the contract price, the producer must
also elect a 100 percent price election
percent for peanuts insured using
FCIC’s announced price election.
FCIC is proposing to revise a new
section 3(b) to specify that producers
who are insuring contracted peanuts
cannot insure more pounds of peanuts
than the production guarantee (per acre)
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
4058
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
multiplied by the number of acres that
will be planted to peanuts. Provisions
are also added that specify that
production under a sheller contract
equal to or less than the production
guarantee will be valued by using the
price election computed from the base
contract price stated in the sheller
contract. If the producer did not
contract for the total production
guarantee, any loss more than the
amount stated in the sheller contract
will be valued using the price election
provided by FCIC. These provisions are
necessary to prevent the producer from
over insuring his peanuts by producing
more than are under contract and
insuring all the peanuts produced at the
contract price.
FCIC is proposing to remove the
current section 3(c) because all
producers will now be required to file
an annual production report. The
previous provisions states producers
may be required to annually report
production but since they now must
report, and such reporting will be in
accordance with section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, there is no reason to have a
separate report in these Crop Provisions.
Removal of these provisions will result
in a default to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions.
FCIC is proposing to add a new
section 3(c) to specify that any peanuts
excluded from the sheller contract at
any time during the crop year will be
insured at the price election announced
by FCIC. Again, this provision is
necessary to prevent the over insurance
of the peanuts by valuing them at a
contract price when they are no longer
under contract.
Section 6—Remove the provisions
regarding reporting the effective
poundage marketing quota because it is
no longer applicable and replacing them
with provisions that require that a copy
of all peanut sheller contracts must be
provided to the insurance provider on
or before the acreage reporting date if
the producer wishes to insure the
peanuts in accordance with the sheller
contract. This will permit approved
insurance providers to properly
determine the production guarantees
and premium owed.
Section 7—Remove and reserve this
section because the elimination of the
quotas will permit annual premium to
be calculated in accordance with the
provisions in the Basic Provisions.
Section 8—Restructure the section
and add a new section 8(a)(5) to specify
peanuts may be insured whether or not
they are grown in accordance with a
sheller contract. The policy allows
insurance for both, the only issue is the
value of the peanuts. The provision will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
specify that if the peanuts are not grown
in accordance with the sheller contract,
they will be valued at the price election
announced by FCIC. This will prevent
peanuts that do not qualify for the
contract price from being insured at
such price.
FCIC also proposes to add a new
section 8(b) specifying when the
producer will be considered to have a
share in the insured crop. To be insured,
the producer must have a risk of loss in
the crop. However, there may be
contracts where a set payment under the
contract is guaranteed by the sheller and
the sheller bears the entire risk of crop
loss. In such circumstances, the
producer would not have an insurable
interest. This is consistent with other
contracted crops.
FCIC also proposes to add a new
section 8(c) that specifies that a peanut
producer who is also a sheller or
handler may establish an insurable
interest if specified requirements are
met. Since the sheller controls the
contract price and the records of
production to count, it is possible for
such producers to manipulate losses. As
a result, FCIC requires specific
conditions to be met before producers
who are shellers can insure the crop.
This is consistent with other contracted
crops.
Section 12—Restructure the section.
FCIC also proposes to revise the
provisions to make the statement in the
Basic Provisions ineffective that states
the replanting payment per acre will be
limited to the producers actual cost for
replanting and remove such references
from section 12. The actual costs
associated with replanting peanuts have
increased over the years and seldom, if
ever, would the actual cost be less than
the maximum amount allowed in the
Crop Provisions. However, it is very
burdensome for the approved insurance
providers to collect the records of the
actual costs. Since such records are
seldom ever used, there is no longer the
need impose this burden on the
approved insurance provider. This
change should have little effect on the
replant payment amounts. FCIC is also
proposing to add a new section 12(d) to
specify replanting payments will be
calculated using the applicable price
election and production guarantee for
the crop type that is replanted and
insured. A revised acreage report will
also be required to reflect the replanted
type, if applicable. There have been
instances where producers have
replanted a different insured crop type
that has different yields and prices than
the type originally planted. This could
result in the crop being over-insured or
under-insured if the production
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
guarantee and prices were based on the
crop type originally planted. Instead,
FCIC has proposed to add provisions to
ensure that the production guarantee
and replanting payment are based on
the yield and prices for the type that is
replanted. A revised acreage report will
be required to reflect the replanted type,
as applicable.
Section 13—FCIC proposes to revise
to remove those provisions that are now
included in section 14 of the Basic
Provisions.
Section 14—FCIC is proposing to
remove section 14(b) because it pertains
to marketing quotas, which have been
eliminated rendering the provisions
moot. FCIC also proposes to revise and
restructure section 14(b) to remove all
references to quotas and instead, allow
a distinction to be made between
peanuts insured under a sheller contract
and the contract price and those that are
insured at the FCIC announced price
election. Further, FCIC proposes to add
provisions that specify the priority
given for the contract price to the
production to count when there is more
than one sheller contract. The
production to count will be valued
using the highest price election first and
will continue in decreasing order to the
lowest price election based on the
amount or peanuts insured at each price
election. These provisions are necessary
to prevent the producer from over
insuring their peanuts by producing
more peanuts than are under contract
and insuring all the peanuts produced at
the contract price. FCIC also proposes to
revise the computations to take into
consideration the different values of
peanuts depending on whether they are
under contract or not. To the extent the
producer is unable to fulfill the sheller
contract, the value of such lost peanuts
will be based on the contracted price.
The value of peanuts lost over and
above the contracted amount will be
valued at the FCIC announced price.
Section 15—FCIC proposes to add a
new provision to provide prevented
planting coverage. Previously these
provisions were in the Special
Provisions and are being moved to the
Crop Provisions to be consistent with
other crops that have prevented planting
provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Peanuts, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 457 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
2. Revise the introductory text of
§ 457.134 to read as follows:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
§ 457.134 Peanut crop insurance
provisions.
The peanut crop insurance provisions
for the 2007 and succeeding crop years
are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend section 1 of § 457.134 by
adding definitions for ‘‘base contract
price,’’ ‘‘enterprise unit,’’ ‘‘handler,’’
‘‘harvest,’’ ‘‘marketing associations,’’
‘‘price election,’’ ‘‘sheller’’ and ‘‘sheller
contract’’, revising definitions of
‘‘farmers’ stock peanuts’’ and ‘‘planted
acreage’’, and removing definitions of
‘‘approved yield,’’ ‘‘average price per
pound,’’ ‘‘average support price per
pound,’’ ‘‘CCC,’’ ‘‘county,’’ ‘‘effective
poundage marketing quota,’’
‘‘inspection certificate and sales
memorandum,’’ ‘‘non-quota peanuts,’’
‘‘production guarantee (per acre),’’
‘‘quota peanuts,’’ ‘‘segregation I, II, or
III,’’ and ‘‘value per pound’’ to read as
follows:
1. Definitions
Base contract price. The price for
farmers’ stock peanuts stipulated in the
sheller contract, without regard to
discounts or incentives that may apply;
not to exceed the maximum amount
specified in the Special Provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
Enterprise unit. If you do not insure
any peanuts in accordance with a
sheller contract, an enterprise unit is in
accordance with section 34 and the
definition of ‘‘enterprise unit’’ in section
1 of the Basic Provisions. However, if
you insure any peanuts in accordance
with a sheller contract, in lieu of the
definition of ‘‘enterprise unit’’ in section
1 of the Basic Provisions, an enterprise
unit will be all insurable acreage of the
peanuts in the county in which you
have a share on the date coverage begins
for the crop year.
Farmers’ stock peanuts. Picked or
threshed peanuts produced in the
United States which are not shelled,
crushed, cleaned, or otherwise changed
(except for removal of foreign material,
loose shelled kernels and excess
moisture) from the condition in which
peanuts are customarily marketed by
producers.
*
*
*
*
*
Handler. A person who is a sheller, a
buying point, a marketing association,
or has a contract with a sheller or a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
marketing association to accept all of
the peanuts marketed through the
marketing association for the crop year.
The handler acquires peanuts for resale,
domestic consumption, processing,
exportation, or crushing through a
business involved in buying and selling
peanuts or peanut products.
Harvest. Removal of peanuts from the
field.
Marketing association. A cooperative
approved by the Secretary to issue
payment programs for peanuts.
Planted acreage. In addition to the
requirement in the definition in the
Basic Provisions, peanuts must initially
be planted in a row pattern which
permits mechanical cultivation or in a
manner that allows the peanuts to be
cared for in a manner recognized by
agriculture experts as a good farming
practice. Acreage planted in any other
manner will not be insurable unless
otherwise provided by the Special
Provisions or by written agreement.
Price election. In addition to the
definition in the Basic Provisions, the
price election for peanuts insured in
accordance with a sheller contract will
be the percentage you elect multiplied
by the base contract price specified in
the sheller contract.
Sheller. Any business enterprise
regularly engaged in processing peanuts
for human consumption, that possesses
all licenses and permits for processing
peanuts required by the state in which
it operates, and that possesses facilities,
or has contractual access to such
facilities, with enough equipment to
accept and process contracted peanuts
within a reasonable amount of time after
harvest.
Sheller contract. A written agreement
between the producer and a sheller, or
between the producer and a handler,
containing at a minimum:
(a) The producer’s commitment to
plant and grow peanuts, and to deliver
the peanut production to the sheller or
handler;
(b) The sheller’s or handler’s
commitment to purchase all the
production stated in the sheller contract
(an option to purchase is not a
commitment); and
(c) A base contract price.
If the agreement fails to contain any of
these terms, it will not be considered a
sheller contract.
4. Revise section 2 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
2. Unit Division
(a) If you insure any acreage in the
county in accordance with one or more
sheller contracts, you are only eligible
for an enterprise unit on all insurable
acreage of peanuts in the county.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4059
(b) If you insure all acreage in the
county under the price election
announced by FCIC in accordance with
the Basic Provisions, you may elect to
insure your peanut acreage in the
county as:
(1) An enterprise unit; or
(2) Any other unit structure you may
qualify for under section 34 of the Basic
Provisions.
5. Revise section 3 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage
Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
In addition to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions:
(a) The price election percentage you
choose for peanuts which are not
insured in accordance with a sheller
contract (may also include peanuts in
excess of the amount required to fulfill
your sheller contract) and for peanuts
insured in accordance with a sheller
contract must have the same percentage
relationship to the maximum price
election offered by us for peanuts not
insured in accordance with a sheller
contract. For example, if you choose 100
percent of the maximum price election
for peanuts not insured in accordance
with a sheller contract, you must also
choose 100 percent of the applicable
price election for peanuts insured in
accordance with a sheller contract.
(b) You may insure your peanuts in
accordance with a sheller contract,
however, you may not insure for more
pounds of peanuts than your production
guarantee (per acre) multiplied by the
number of acres that will be planted to
peanuts.
(1) Any loss of production equal to or
less than your production guarantee (per
acre) will be valued by using the price
election computed from the base
contract price stated in your sheller
contract.
(2) If you do not contract for your total
production guarantee any loss above the
amount stated in the contract will be
valued based on the price election
issued by FCIC.
(c) Any peanuts excluded from the
sheller contract at any time during the
crop year will be insured at the price
election issued by FCIC and elected by
you.
6. Revise section 6 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
6. Report of Acreage
In addition to the requirements of
section 6 of the Basic Provisions, you
must provide a copy of all sheller
contracts to us on or before the acreage
reporting date if you wish to insure your
peanuts in accordance with your sheller
contract.
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
4060
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
7. Remove and reserve section 7 of
§ 457.134.
8. Revise section 8 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
8. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with section 8 of the
Basic Provisions, the crop insured will
be all the peanuts in the county for
which a premium rate is provided by
the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for the purpose of
marketing as farmers’ stock peanuts;
(3) That are a type of peanut
designated in the Special Provisions as
being insurable;
(4) That are not (unless allowed by the
Special Provisions or by written
agreement):
(i) Planted for the purpose of
harvesting as green peanuts;
(ii) Interplanted with another crop; or
(iii) Planted into an established grass
or legume; and
(5) Whether or not the peanuts are
grown in accordance with a sheller
contract (if not grown in accordance
with the sheller contract, the peanuts
will be valued at the price election
issued by FCIC for the purposes of
determining the production guarantee,
premium, and indemnity).
(b) You will be considered to have a
share in the insured crop if, under the
sheller contract, you retain control of
the acreage on which the peanuts are
grown, you are at risk of a production
loss, and the sheller contract provides
for delivery of the peanuts to the sheller
or handler and for a stipulated base
contract price.
(c) A peanut producer who is also a
sheller or handler may establish an
insurable interest if the following
requirements are met:
(1) The producer must comply with
these Crop Provisions;
(2) Prior to the sales closing date, the
Board of Directors or officers of the
sheller or the handler must execute and
adopt a resolution that contains the
same terms as a sheller contract. Such
resolution will be considered a sheller
contract under this policy; and
(3) Our inspection reveals that the
processing facilities comply with the
definition of a sheller contained in these
Crop Provisions.
9. Revise section 12 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
12. Replanting Payments
(a) A replanting payment is allowed
as follows:
(1) In lieu of provisions in section 13
of the Basic Provisions that limit the
amount of a replant payment to the
actual cost of replanting, the amount of
any replanting payment will be
determined in accordance with these
Crop Provisions;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
(2) Except as specified in section
12(a)(1), you must comply with all
requirements regarding replanting
payments contained in section 13 of the
Basic Provisions; and
(3) The insured crop must be damaged
by an insurable cause of loss to the
extent that the remaining stand will not
produce at least 90 percent of the
production guarantee for the acreage
and it is practical to replant.
(b) The maximum amount of the
replanting payment per acre will be the
lesser of:
(1) 20.0 percent of the production
guarantee, multiplied by your price
election, multiplied by your share; or
(2) $80.00 multiplied by your insured
share.
(c) When the crop is replanted using
a practice that is uninsurable for an
original planting, the liability on the
unit will be reduced by the amount of
the replanting payment. The premium
amount will not be reduced.
(d) Replanting payments will be
calculated using your price election and
production guarantee for the crop type
that is replanted and insured. A revised
acreage report will be required to reflect
the replanted type, if applicable.
10. Revise section 13 of § 457.134 to
read as follows:
13. Duties in the Event of Damage or
Loss
Representative samples are required
in accordance with section 14 of the
Basic Provisions.
11. Amend section 14 of § 457.134 as
follows:
a. Remove paragraphs (b) and (g),
redesignate paragraphs (c) through (f) as
subsections (b) through (e) respectively;
b. Revise paragraph (a) and newly
redesignated paragraph (b);
c. Amend newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(3) by removing ‘‘(f)’’ and
adding ‘‘(e)’’ in its place;
d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (e); and
e. Remove the note at the end of
section 14.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
14. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a
unit basis. In the event you are unable
to provide records of production that are
acceptable to us for any:
(1) Optional unit, we will combine all
optional units for which acceptable
records of production were not
provided; or
(2) Basic unit, we will allocate any
commingled production to such units in
proportion to our liability on the
harvested acreage for the unit.
(b) In the event of loss or damage
covered by this policy, we will settle
your claim by:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) Multiplying the number of insured
acres by the respective production
guarantee (per acre) for peanuts insured
under a sheller contract at the base
contract price and for peanuts not
insured under a sheller contract or you
have elected the FCIC issued price
election, as applicable;
(2) Multiplying each result of section
14(b)(1) by the applicable price election
for peanuts insured at the base contract
price or the price election issued by
FCIC, as applicable;
(3) Totaling the results of section
14(b)(2);
(4) Multiplying the production to be
counted by the respective price election
(If you have one or more sheller
contracts, we will value your
production to count by using your
highest price election first and will
continue in decreasing order to your
lowest price election based on the
amount or peanuts insured at each price
election);
(5) Totaling the results of section
14(b)(4);
(6) Subtracting the result of section
14(b)(5) from the result of section
14(b)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section
14(b)(6) by your share.
Example # 1 (without a sheller
contract):
You have 100 percent share in 25
acres of Valencia peanuts in the unit,
with a production guarantee (per acre)
of 2,000 pounds, the price election is
$0.17 per pound, and your production
to be counted is 43,000 pounds.
(1) 25 acres × 2,000 pounds = 50,000
pound guarantee;
(2) 50,000 pound guarantee × $0.17
price election = $8,500.00 guarantee;
(4) 43,000 pounds of production to be
counted × $0.17 price election =
$7,310.00;
(5) $8,500.00 guarantee ¥$7,310.00 =
$1,190.00; and
(6) $1,190.00 × 1.000 = $1,190.00;
Indemnity = $1,190.00.
Example # 2 (with a sheller contract):
You have 100 percent share in 25
acres of Valencia peanuts in the unit,
with a production guarantee (per acre)
of 2,000 pounds. You have two sheller
contracts, the first is for 25,000 pounds,
price election (contract) is $0.23 per
pound, and the second is for 10,000
pounds, price election (contract) is
$0.21 per pound. The price election
(non-contract) is $0.17 per pound, and
your production to be counted is 43,000
pounds.
(1) 25 acres × 2,000 pounds = 50,000
pound guarantee;
(2) 25,000 pounds contracted × $0.23
price election (contract) = $5,750.00;
10,000 pounds contracted × $0.21 price
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Proposed Rules
election (contract) = $2,100.00; 50,000
pound guarantee ¥25,000 pounds
contracted ¥10,000 pounds contracted
= 15,000 pounds not contracted; 15,000
pounds not contracted × $0.17 price
election (non-contract) = $2,550.00;
(3) $5,750.00 + $2,100.00 + $2,550.00
= $10,400.00 guarantee;
(4) 43,000 pounds of production to be
counted: 25,000 pounds contracted ×
$0.23 price election (contract) =
$5,750.00; 10,000 pounds contracted ×
$0.21 price election (contract) =
$2,100.00; 43,000 pounds of production
to be counted ¥25,000 pounds
contracted (at $0.23 per pound)
¥10,000 pounds contracted (at $0.21
per pound) = 8,000 pounds; 8,000
pounds × $0.17 price election (noncontract) = $1,360.00;
(5) $5,750.00 + $2,100.00 + $1,360.00
= $9,210.00;
(6) $10,400.00 guarantee ¥ $9,210.00
= $1,190.00; and
(7) $1,190.00 × 1.000 = $1,190.00;
Indemnity = $1,190.00.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Mature peanuts may be adjusted
for quality when production has been
damaged by insurable causes.
(1) To enable us to determine the
number of pounds, price per pound, and
the quality of production for any
peanuts that qualify for quality
adjustment, we must be given the
opportunity to have such peanuts
inspected and graded before you
dispose of them.
(2) If you dispose of any production
without giving us the opportunity to
have the peanuts inspected and graded,
the gross weight of such production will
be used in determining total production
to count unless you submit a marketing
record satisfactory to us which clearly
shows the number of pounds, price per
pounds, and quality of such peanuts.
(3) Such production to count will be
reduced if the price per pound received
for damaged peanuts is less than 85
percent of the applicable price election
by:
(i) Dividing the price per pound, as
determined by us in accordance with
section 14(e)(1), received for the insured
type of peanuts by the applicable price
election; and
(ii) Multiplying this result by the
number of pounds of such production.
12. Add a new section 15 of § 457.134
to read as follows:
15. Prevented Planting
Your prevented planting coverage will
be 50 percent of your production
guarantee for timely planted acreage. If
you have additional levels of coverage,
as specified in 7 CFR part 400, subpart
T, and pay an additional premium, you
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:04 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
may increase your prevented planting
coverage to a level specified in the
actuarial documents.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 17,
2006.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6–855 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
RIN 3150–AH29
Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-ofCoolant Accident Technical
Requirements; Extension of Comment
Period
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule: Extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On November 7, 2005 (70 FR
67598), the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) published for public
comment a proposed rule amending its
regulations to permit current power
reactor licensees to implement a
voluntary, risk-informed alternative to
the current requirements for analyzing
the performance of emergency core
cooling systems during loss-of-coolant
accidents. On December 6, 2005, the
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) requested
a 30 day extension to the comment
period for the proposed rule. On
December 20, 2005, the Westinghouse
Owners Group submitted a letter
endorsing the NEI extension request.
The extension requests were based on
the occurrence of two major holidays
during the comment period which
limited the time available to coordinate
industry comments from owners groups,
vendors, and licensees. The NRC is
extending the comment period on the
proposed rule by an additional 30 days
from the original February 6, 2006
deadline until March 8, 2006. This
comment period extension also applies
to related public comments submitted
on the NRC report on Seismic
Considerations for the Transition Break
Size (70 FR 75501).
DATES: The comment period has been
extended and now expires on March 8,
2006. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received before this date.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4061
Mail written comments to:
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001. Attn: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff.
Hand delivered comments should also
be addressed to the Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and
delivered to: 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD, between 7:30 am and
4:15 pm Federal workdays.
You may also provide comments via
the NRC’s interactive rulemaking Web
site https://ruleforum.llnl.gov. This site
also provides the availability to upload
comments as files (any format), if your
web browser supports that function. For
information about the interactive
rulemaking site, contact Ms. Carol
Gallagher, (301) 415–5905; e-mail:
CAG@nrc.gov.
Certain documents relating to this
rulemaking, including comments
received, may be examined at the NRC
Public Document Room, 11555
Rockville Pike, Room O1–F21,
Rockville, MD. The same documents
may also be viewed and downloaded
electronically via the rulemaking Web
site; https://ruleforum.llnl.gov.
Documents created or received at the
NRC after November 1, 1999 are also
available electronically at the NRC’s
Public Electronic Reading room on the
Internet at https://www.nrc.gov/NRC/
ADAMS/. From this site, the
public can gain entry into the NRC’s
Agencywide Document Access and
Management System (ADAMS), which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. For more
information, contact the NRC Public
Document Room (PDR) Reference staff
at 1–800–397–4209, 202–634–3273 or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard F. Dudley, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone (301) 415–
1116, e-mail rfd@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day
of January, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–857 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\25JAP1.SGM
25JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4056-4061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-855]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563-AB97
Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Peanut Crop Insurance
Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations, Peanut Crop Insurance
Provisions to remove all references to quota and non-quota peanuts and
add provisions that will allow coverage for peanuts whether or not they
are under contract with a sheller to better meet the needs of insured
producers. The changes will apply for the 2007 and succeeding crop
years.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business March 27, 2006 and will be considered
when the rule is to be made final. Comments on information collection
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 must be received on or before
March 27, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to
the Director, Product Development Division, Risk Management Agency,
United States Department of Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop 0812,
Room 421, Kansas City, MO 64133-4676. Comments titled ``Peanut Crop
Provisions'' may be sent via the Internet to
DirectorPDD@rm.fcic.usda.gov, or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:/
/www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. A copy of each response will be available for public
inspection and copying from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., c.s.t., Monday through
Friday, except holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Johnson, Risk Management
Specialist, Research and Development, Product Development Division,
Risk Management Agency, at the Kansas City, MO, address listed above,
telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053 through
November 30, 2007.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) Compliance
FCIC is committed to compliance with the GPEA, which requires
Government agencies, in general, to provide the public with the option
of submitting information or transacting business electronically to the
maximum extent possible. FCIC requires that all reinsured companies be
in compliance with the Freedom to E-File Act and section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss.
[[Page 4057]]
Whether a producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference
in the kind of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is
available to small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes
FCIC to waive collection of administrative fees from limited resource
farmers. FCIC believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities
are given the same opportunities as large entities to manage their
risks through the use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis has not been prepared since this regulation does not have an
impact on small entities, and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 and 7 CFR part 400, subpart J for
the informal administrative review process of good farming practices,
as applicable, must be exhausted before any action against FCIC for
judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
FCIC proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Peanut Crop Insurance Provisions to remove all references to quota and
non-quota peanuts because the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 eliminated the peanut quota program as administered by the Farm
Service Agency (FSA). FCIC anticipated that quotas could be eliminated
years ago and previously included provisions that permitted guarantees
to be based on the actual production history of the producer. This has
allowed the program to operate since 2002. However, reference to quotas
in the pricing methodology and other provisions has caused some
confusion that will be eliminated when references are removed.
The proposed changes are as follows:
Section 1--Definitions--Add definitions for ``base contract
price,'' ``handler,'' ``harvest,'' ``marketing association,'' ``price
election,'' ``sheller,'' and ``sheller contract'' since these terms are
required to provide insurance under a sheller contract. To the maximum
extent practicable, these definitions will be given the same meaning as
similar terms in other insured contracted crops. Revise the definition
of ``farmers' stock peanuts'' to specifically state farmer stock
peanuts have to be picked and threshed. Revise the definition of
``planted acreage'' to recognize peanuts are sometimes planted with two
rows close together followed by a space wide enough to permit
mechanical cultivation followed by two rows planted close together.
This revision allows peanut producers to cultivate their peanuts in a
manner recognized by agriculture experts as a good farming practice.
Remove the definitions of ``approved yield,'' ``county,'' and
``production guarantee (per acre)'' because these definitions will now
be the same as the definitions in the Basic Provisions. Remove the
definitions of ``average price per pound,'' ``average support price per
pound,'' ``CCC,'' ``effective poundage marketing quota,'' ``inspection
certificate and sales memorandum,'' ``non-quota peanuts,'' ``quota
peanuts,'' ``segregation I, II, or III,'' and ``value per pound''
because the elimination of the peanut quotas make these definitions no
longer applicable to the Crop Provisions.
Section 2--Revise section 2 to specify that if the producer insures
any peanuts in accordance with a sheller contract all of the producer's
peanut acreage in the county will be considered one enterprise unit. It
is possible for producers to have several sheller contracts with
different prices. Requiring that all peanut acreage in the county be
included in one enterprise unit prevents the producer from shifting
production from a unit with a higher price to a unit with a lower price
in order to create or increase an indemnity. The producer must report
all applicable information separately by sheller contract on the
acreage report and any claim forms. However, the information for each
contract will be aggregated to obtain the total information for the
unit. This requirement for reporting separately, and aggregating for
the unit, is also necessary if the producer has both peanuts under a
sheller contract and non-contract peanuts in the same unit.
Regardless of whether the peanuts are covered by a sheller
contract, if the producer elects to insure all of the peanuts in the
county using the price election provided by FCIC, the producer will be
eligible for unit division (optional, basic, or enterprise) in
accordance with section 34 the Basic Provisions if the requirements for
such units are met.
Section 3--Remove the references to quota and non-quota peanuts,
quota price elections, and the effective poundage marketing quota
throughout the section. FCIC is also proposing to now cover peanuts
under contract with a sheller at the contract price. Currently, there
is only one price election announced by FCIC that is applicable to all
peanuts but many producers claim to receive a higher price for their
peanuts under contract with shellers. These provisions will permit
producers to insure their peanuts at the contract prices if all other
conditions in the policy are met. Producers will still have the option
to insure their peanuts that are not covered by a sheller contract
under the FCIC announced price election. Further, even if the peanuts
are covered by a sheller contract, the producer can still elect to
insure them using the price election announced by FCIC.
In section 3(a), FCIC also proposes to revise the provisions to
specify that the price election percentage the producer chooses for
peanuts not insured using the sheller contract price (which also
includes peanuts in excess of the amount required to fulfill the
producer's sheller contract) and for peanuts insured using the sheller
contract price must have the same percentage relationship to the
maximum price election offered by the FCIC. For example, if the
producer elects a 100 percent price election percentage for peanuts
insured at the contract price, the producer must also elect a 100
percent price election percent for peanuts insured using FCIC's
announced price election.
FCIC is proposing to revise a new section 3(b) to specify that
producers who are insuring contracted peanuts cannot insure more pounds
of peanuts than the production guarantee (per acre)
[[Page 4058]]
multiplied by the number of acres that will be planted to peanuts.
Provisions are also added that specify that production under a sheller
contract equal to or less than the production guarantee will be valued
by using the price election computed from the base contract price
stated in the sheller contract. If the producer did not contract for
the total production guarantee, any loss more than the amount stated in
the sheller contract will be valued using the price election provided
by FCIC. These provisions are necessary to prevent the producer from
over insuring his peanuts by producing more than are under contract and
insuring all the peanuts produced at the contract price.
FCIC is proposing to remove the current section 3(c) because all
producers will now be required to file an annual production report. The
previous provisions states producers may be required to annually report
production but since they now must report, and such reporting will be
in accordance with section 3 of the Basic Provisions, there is no
reason to have a separate report in these Crop Provisions. Removal of
these provisions will result in a default to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions.
FCIC is proposing to add a new section 3(c) to specify that any
peanuts excluded from the sheller contract at any time during the crop
year will be insured at the price election announced by FCIC. Again,
this provision is necessary to prevent the over insurance of the
peanuts by valuing them at a contract price when they are no longer
under contract.
Section 6--Remove the provisions regarding reporting the effective
poundage marketing quota because it is no longer applicable and
replacing them with provisions that require that a copy of all peanut
sheller contracts must be provided to the insurance provider on or
before the acreage reporting date if the producer wishes to insure the
peanuts in accordance with the sheller contract. This will permit
approved insurance providers to properly determine the production
guarantees and premium owed.
Section 7--Remove and reserve this section because the elimination
of the quotas will permit annual premium to be calculated in accordance
with the provisions in the Basic Provisions.
Section 8--Restructure the section and add a new section 8(a)(5) to
specify peanuts may be insured whether or not they are grown in
accordance with a sheller contract. The policy allows insurance for
both, the only issue is the value of the peanuts. The provision will
specify that if the peanuts are not grown in accordance with the
sheller contract, they will be valued at the price election announced
by FCIC. This will prevent peanuts that do not qualify for the contract
price from being insured at such price.
FCIC also proposes to add a new section 8(b) specifying when the
producer will be considered to have a share in the insured crop. To be
insured, the producer must have a risk of loss in the crop. However,
there may be contracts where a set payment under the contract is
guaranteed by the sheller and the sheller bears the entire risk of crop
loss. In such circumstances, the producer would not have an insurable
interest. This is consistent with other contracted crops.
FCIC also proposes to add a new section 8(c) that specifies that a
peanut producer who is also a sheller or handler may establish an
insurable interest if specified requirements are met. Since the sheller
controls the contract price and the records of production to count, it
is possible for such producers to manipulate losses. As a result, FCIC
requires specific conditions to be met before producers who are
shellers can insure the crop. This is consistent with other contracted
crops.
Section 12--Restructure the section. FCIC also proposes to revise
the provisions to make the statement in the Basic Provisions
ineffective that states the replanting payment per acre will be limited
to the producers actual cost for replanting and remove such references
from section 12. The actual costs associated with replanting peanuts
have increased over the years and seldom, if ever, would the actual
cost be less than the maximum amount allowed in the Crop Provisions.
However, it is very burdensome for the approved insurance providers to
collect the records of the actual costs. Since such records are seldom
ever used, there is no longer the need impose this burden on the
approved insurance provider. This change should have little effect on
the replant payment amounts. FCIC is also proposing to add a new
section 12(d) to specify replanting payments will be calculated using
the applicable price election and production guarantee for the crop
type that is replanted and insured. A revised acreage report will also
be required to reflect the replanted type, if applicable. There have
been instances where producers have replanted a different insured crop
type that has different yields and prices than the type originally
planted. This could result in the crop being over-insured or under-
insured if the production guarantee and prices were based on the crop
type originally planted. Instead, FCIC has proposed to add provisions
to ensure that the production guarantee and replanting payment are
based on the yield and prices for the type that is replanted. A revised
acreage report will be required to reflect the replanted type, as
applicable.
Section 13--FCIC proposes to revise to remove those provisions that
are now included in section 14 of the Basic Provisions.
Section 14--FCIC is proposing to remove section 14(b) because it
pertains to marketing quotas, which have been eliminated rendering the
provisions moot. FCIC also proposes to revise and restructure section
14(b) to remove all references to quotas and instead, allow a
distinction to be made between peanuts insured under a sheller contract
and the contract price and those that are insured at the FCIC announced
price election. Further, FCIC proposes to add provisions that specify
the priority given for the contract price to the production to count
when there is more than one sheller contract. The production to count
will be valued using the highest price election first and will continue
in decreasing order to the lowest price election based on the amount or
peanuts insured at each price election. These provisions are necessary
to prevent the producer from over insuring their peanuts by producing
more peanuts than are under contract and insuring all the peanuts
produced at the contract price. FCIC also proposes to revise the
computations to take into consideration the different values of peanuts
depending on whether they are under contract or not. To the extent the
producer is unable to fulfill the sheller contract, the value of such
lost peanuts will be based on the contracted price. The value of
peanuts lost over and above the contracted amount will be valued at the
FCIC announced price.
Section 15--FCIC proposes to add a new provision to provide
prevented planting coverage. Previously these provisions were in the
Special Provisions and are being moved to the Crop Provisions to be
consistent with other crops that have prevented planting provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Peanuts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 to read as
follows:
[[Page 4059]]
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
2. Revise the introductory text of Sec. 457.134 to read as
follows:
Sec. 457.134 Peanut crop insurance provisions.
The peanut crop insurance provisions for the 2007 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
* * * * *
3. Amend section 1 of Sec. 457.134 by adding definitions for
``base contract price,'' ``enterprise unit,'' ``handler,'' ``harvest,''
``marketing associations,'' ``price election,'' ``sheller'' and
``sheller contract'', revising definitions of ``farmers' stock
peanuts'' and ``planted acreage'', and removing definitions of
``approved yield,'' ``average price per pound,'' ``average support
price per pound,'' ``CCC,'' ``county,'' ``effective poundage marketing
quota,'' ``inspection certificate and sales memorandum,'' ``non-quota
peanuts,'' ``production guarantee (per acre),'' ``quota peanuts,''
``segregation I, II, or III,'' and ``value per pound'' to read as
follows:
1. Definitions
Base contract price. The price for farmers' stock peanuts
stipulated in the sheller contract, without regard to discounts or
incentives that may apply; not to exceed the maximum amount specified
in the Special Provisions.
* * * * *
Enterprise unit. If you do not insure any peanuts in accordance
with a sheller contract, an enterprise unit is in accordance with
section 34 and the definition of ``enterprise unit'' in section 1 of
the Basic Provisions. However, if you insure any peanuts in accordance
with a sheller contract, in lieu of the definition of ``enterprise
unit'' in section 1 of the Basic Provisions, an enterprise unit will be
all insurable acreage of the peanuts in the county in which you have a
share on the date coverage begins for the crop year.
Farmers' stock peanuts. Picked or threshed peanuts produced in the
United States which are not shelled, crushed, cleaned, or otherwise
changed (except for removal of foreign material, loose shelled kernels
and excess moisture) from the condition in which peanuts are
customarily marketed by producers.
* * * * *
Handler. A person who is a sheller, a buying point, a marketing
association, or has a contract with a sheller or a marketing
association to accept all of the peanuts marketed through the marketing
association for the crop year. The handler acquires peanuts for resale,
domestic consumption, processing, exportation, or crushing through a
business involved in buying and selling peanuts or peanut products.
Harvest. Removal of peanuts from the field.
Marketing association. A cooperative approved by the Secretary to
issue payment programs for peanuts.
Planted acreage. In addition to the requirement in the definition
in the Basic Provisions, peanuts must initially be planted in a row
pattern which permits mechanical cultivation or in a manner that allows
the peanuts to be cared for in a manner recognized by agriculture
experts as a good farming practice. Acreage planted in any other manner
will not be insurable unless otherwise provided by the Special
Provisions or by written agreement.
Price election. In addition to the definition in the Basic
Provisions, the price election for peanuts insured in accordance with a
sheller contract will be the percentage you elect multiplied by the
base contract price specified in the sheller contract.
Sheller. Any business enterprise regularly engaged in processing
peanuts for human consumption, that possesses all licenses and permits
for processing peanuts required by the state in which it operates, and
that possesses facilities, or has contractual access to such
facilities, with enough equipment to accept and process contracted
peanuts within a reasonable amount of time after harvest.
Sheller contract. A written agreement between the producer and a
sheller, or between the producer and a handler, containing at a
minimum:
(a) The producer's commitment to plant and grow peanuts, and to
deliver the peanut production to the sheller or handler;
(b) The sheller's or handler's commitment to purchase all the
production stated in the sheller contract (an option to purchase is not
a commitment); and
(c) A base contract price.
If the agreement fails to contain any of these terms, it will not be
considered a sheller contract.
4. Revise section 2 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
2. Unit Division
(a) If you insure any acreage in the county in accordance with one
or more sheller contracts, you are only eligible for an enterprise unit
on all insurable acreage of peanuts in the county.
(b) If you insure all acreage in the county under the price
election announced by FCIC in accordance with the Basic Provisions, you
may elect to insure your peanut acreage in the county as:
(1) An enterprise unit; or
(2) Any other unit structure you may qualify for under section 34
of the Basic Provisions.
5. Revise section 3 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for
Determining Indemnities
In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions:
(a) The price election percentage you choose for peanuts which are
not insured in accordance with a sheller contract (may also include
peanuts in excess of the amount required to fulfill your sheller
contract) and for peanuts insured in accordance with a sheller contract
must have the same percentage relationship to the maximum price
election offered by us for peanuts not insured in accordance with a
sheller contract. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the maximum
price election for peanuts not insured in accordance with a sheller
contract, you must also choose 100 percent of the applicable price
election for peanuts insured in accordance with a sheller contract.
(b) You may insure your peanuts in accordance with a sheller
contract, however, you may not insure for more pounds of peanuts than
your production guarantee (per acre) multiplied by the number of acres
that will be planted to peanuts.
(1) Any loss of production equal to or less than your production
guarantee (per acre) will be valued by using the price election
computed from the base contract price stated in your sheller contract.
(2) If you do not contract for your total production guarantee any
loss above the amount stated in the contract will be valued based on
the price election issued by FCIC.
(c) Any peanuts excluded from the sheller contract at any time
during the crop year will be insured at the price election issued by
FCIC and elected by you.
6. Revise section 6 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
6. Report of Acreage
In addition to the requirements of section 6 of the Basic
Provisions, you must provide a copy of all sheller contracts to us on
or before the acreage reporting date if you wish to insure your peanuts
in accordance with your sheller contract.
[[Page 4060]]
7. Remove and reserve section 7 of Sec. 457.134.
8. Revise section 8 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
8. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the crop
insured will be all the peanuts in the county for which a premium rate
is provided by the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for the purpose of marketing as farmers' stock
peanuts;
(3) That are a type of peanut designated in the Special Provisions
as being insurable;
(4) That are not (unless allowed by the Special Provisions or by
written agreement):
(i) Planted for the purpose of harvesting as green peanuts;
(ii) Interplanted with another crop; or
(iii) Planted into an established grass or legume; and
(5) Whether or not the peanuts are grown in accordance with a
sheller contract (if not grown in accordance with the sheller contract,
the peanuts will be valued at the price election issued by FCIC for the
purposes of determining the production guarantee, premium, and
indemnity).
(b) You will be considered to have a share in the insured crop if,
under the sheller contract, you retain control of the acreage on which
the peanuts are grown, you are at risk of a production loss, and the
sheller contract provides for delivery of the peanuts to the sheller or
handler and for a stipulated base contract price.
(c) A peanut producer who is also a sheller or handler may
establish an insurable interest if the following requirements are met:
(1) The producer must comply with these Crop Provisions;
(2) Prior to the sales closing date, the Board of Directors or
officers of the sheller or the handler must execute and adopt a
resolution that contains the same terms as a sheller contract. Such
resolution will be considered a sheller contract under this policy; and
(3) Our inspection reveals that the processing facilities comply
with the definition of a sheller contained in these Crop Provisions.
9. Revise section 12 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
12. Replanting Payments
(a) A replanting payment is allowed as follows:
(1) In lieu of provisions in section 13 of the Basic Provisions
that limit the amount of a replant payment to the actual cost of
replanting, the amount of any replanting payment will be determined in
accordance with these Crop Provisions;
(2) Except as specified in section 12(a)(1), you must comply with
all requirements regarding replanting payments contained in section 13
of the Basic Provisions; and
(3) The insured crop must be damaged by an insurable cause of loss
to the extent that the remaining stand will not produce at least 90
percent of the production guarantee for the acreage and it is practical
to replant.
(b) The maximum amount of the replanting payment per acre will be
the lesser of:
(1) 20.0 percent of the production guarantee, multiplied by your
price election, multiplied by your share; or
(2) $80.00 multiplied by your insured share.
(c) When the crop is replanted using a practice that is uninsurable
for an original planting, the liability on the unit will be reduced by
the amount of the replanting payment. The premium amount will not be
reduced.
(d) Replanting payments will be calculated using your price
election and production guarantee for the crop type that is replanted
and insured. A revised acreage report will be required to reflect the
replanted type, if applicable.
10. Revise section 13 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
13. Duties in the Event of Damage or Loss
Representative samples are required in accordance with section 14
of the Basic Provisions.
11. Amend section 14 of Sec. 457.134 as follows:
a. Remove paragraphs (b) and (g), redesignate paragraphs (c)
through (f) as subsections (b) through (e) respectively;
b. Revise paragraph (a) and newly redesignated paragraph (b);
c. Amend newly redesignated paragraph (d)(3) by removing ``(f)''
and adding ``(e)'' in its place;
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (e); and
e. Remove the note at the end of section 14.
The revised and added text reads as follows:
14. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event you
are unable to provide records of production that are acceptable to us
for any:
(1) Optional unit, we will combine all optional units for which
acceptable records of production were not provided; or
(2) Basic unit, we will allocate any commingled production to such
units in proportion to our liability on the harvested acreage for the
unit.
(b) In the event of loss or damage covered by this policy, we will
settle your claim by:
(1) Multiplying the number of insured acres by the respective
production guarantee (per acre) for peanuts insured under a sheller
contract at the base contract price and for peanuts not insured under a
sheller contract or you have elected the FCIC issued price election, as
applicable;
(2) Multiplying each result of section 14(b)(1) by the applicable
price election for peanuts insured at the base contract price or the
price election issued by FCIC, as applicable;
(3) Totaling the results of section 14(b)(2);
(4) Multiplying the production to be counted by the respective
price election (If you have one or more sheller contracts, we will
value your production to count by using your highest price election
first and will continue in decreasing order to your lowest price
election based on the amount or peanuts insured at each price
election);
(5) Totaling the results of section 14(b)(4);
(6) Subtracting the result of section 14(b)(5) from the result of
section 14(b)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section 14(b)(6) by your share.
Example 1 (without a sheller contract):
You have 100 percent share in 25 acres of Valencia peanuts in the
unit, with a production guarantee (per acre) of 2,000 pounds, the price
election is $0.17 per pound, and your production to be counted is
43,000 pounds.
(1) 25 acres x 2,000 pounds = 50,000 pound guarantee;
(2) 50,000 pound guarantee x $0.17 price election = $8,500.00
guarantee;
(4) 43,000 pounds of production to be counted x $0.17 price
election = $7,310.00;
(5) $8,500.00 guarantee -$7,310.00 = $1,190.00; and
(6) $1,190.00 x 1.000 = $1,190.00; Indemnity = $1,190.00.
Example 2 (with a sheller contract):
You have 100 percent share in 25 acres of Valencia peanuts in the
unit, with a production guarantee (per acre) of 2,000 pounds. You have
two sheller contracts, the first is for 25,000 pounds, price election
(contract) is $0.23 per pound, and the second is for 10,000 pounds,
price election (contract) is $0.21 per pound. The price election (non-
contract) is $0.17 per pound, and your production to be counted is
43,000 pounds.
(1) 25 acres x 2,000 pounds = 50,000 pound guarantee;
(2) 25,000 pounds contracted x $0.23 price election (contract) =
$5,750.00; 10,000 pounds contracted x $0.21 price
[[Page 4061]]
election (contract) = $2,100.00; 50,000 pound guarantee -25,000 pounds
contracted -10,000 pounds contracted = 15,000 pounds not contracted;
15,000 pounds not contracted x $0.17 price election (non-contract) =
$2,550.00;
(3) $5,750.00 + $2,100.00 + $2,550.00 = $10,400.00 guarantee;
(4) 43,000 pounds of production to be counted: 25,000 pounds
contracted x $0.23 price election (contract) = $5,750.00; 10,000 pounds
contracted x $0.21 price election (contract) = $2,100.00; 43,000 pounds
of production to be counted -25,000 pounds contracted (at $0.23 per
pound) -10,000 pounds contracted (at $0.21 per pound) = 8,000 pounds;
8,000 pounds x $0.17 price election (non-contract) = $1,360.00;
(5) $5,750.00 + $2,100.00 + $1,360.00 = $9,210.00;
(6) $10,400.00 guarantee - $9,210.00 = $1,190.00; and
(7) $1,190.00 x 1.000 = $1,190.00; Indemnity = $1,190.00.
* * * * *
(e) Mature peanuts may be adjusted for quality when production has
been damaged by insurable causes.
(1) To enable us to determine the number of pounds, price per
pound, and the quality of production for any peanuts that qualify for
quality adjustment, we must be given the opportunity to have such
peanuts inspected and graded before you dispose of them.
(2) If you dispose of any production without giving us the
opportunity to have the peanuts inspected and graded, the gross weight
of such production will be used in determining total production to
count unless you submit a marketing record satisfactory to us which
clearly shows the number of pounds, price per pounds, and quality of
such peanuts.
(3) Such production to count will be reduced if the price per pound
received for damaged peanuts is less than 85 percent of the applicable
price election by:
(i) Dividing the price per pound, as determined by us in accordance
with section 14(e)(1), received for the insured type of peanuts by the
applicable price election; and
(ii) Multiplying this result by the number of pounds of such
production.
12. Add a new section 15 of Sec. 457.134 to read as follows:
15. Prevented Planting
Your prevented planting coverage will be 50 percent of your
production guarantee for timely planted acreage. If you have additional
levels of coverage, as specified in 7 CFR part 400, subpart T, and pay
an additional premium, you may increase your prevented planting
coverage to a level specified in the actuarial documents.
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on January 17, 2006.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E6-855 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P