Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Actions To Substantially Restore Natural Quiet to the Grand Canyon National Park and Public Scoping, 4192-4193 [06-708]
Download as PDF
4192
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
965–0454 or by writing to the address
listed above.
Permanent Residence Under Color of
the Law (PRUCOL)—20 CFR 416.1615
and 416.1618—0960–0451. Under
Public Law 104–193, which was
effective August 22, 1996, a non-citizen
must be a ‘‘qualified alien’’ and meet
certain additional requirements in order
to be eligible for Supplemental Security
Income (SSI). This law also established
an exception to the new requirements
for certain ‘‘nonqualified aliens’’ (i.e.,
non-citizens who are not qualified
aliens). Nonqualified aliens who were
receiving SSI on August 22, 1996 were
allowed to remain on the rolls until
September 30, 1997, at which time
benefits would be suspended if the
aliens had not acquired qualified alien
status. Public Law 105–33 extended the
suspension date to September 30, 1998.
Public law 105–306, enacted October
28, 1998, provided that nonqualified
aliens who were receiving SSI on
August 22, 1996 would remain eligible
for SSI after September 30, 1998
provided all other requirements for
eligibility were met (e.g., income and
resources, etc.). SSI eligibility for this
group of aliens—’’grandfathered
nonqualified aliens’’—will continue to
be determined based on the rules
governing alien eligibility in effect prior
to August 22, 1996, i.e., the PRUCOL
standard.
As discussed in SSA regulations at 20
CFR 416.1615 and 416.1618, a PRUCOL
alien must present evidence of his/her
alien status at application and
periodically thereafter as part of the
eligibility determination process for SSI.
SSA verifies the validity of the evidence
of PRUCOL for grandfathered
nonqualified aliens with the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS). Based on
the DHS response, SSA will determine
whether the individual is PRUCOL.
Without this information, SSA would
not be able to determine whether the
individual is eligible for SSI payments.
The respondents are individuals who
have alien status and live in the United
States.
Type of Request: Extension of an
OMB-approved information collection.
Number of Respondents: 9,000.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Burden per Response: 5
minutes.
Estimated Annual Burden: 750 hours.
Dated: January 18, 2006.
Elizabeth A. Davidson,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–888 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Actions To Substantially Restore
Natural Quiet to the Grand Canyon
National Park and Public Scoping
Federal Aviation
Administration and National Park
Service.
ACTION: Notice of Intent: Request for
scoping comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) and the National
Park Service (NPS), as co-leads in the
environmental process, intend to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) under the provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended. The EIS will
address environmental and related
impacts that may result from actions to
be proposed and alternatives to be
developed to achieve the statutory
mandate of Public Law 100–91
(‘‘commonly know as the Overflights
Act’’); to provide for the substantial
restoration of the natural quiet and
experience of Grand Canyon National
Park (GCNP). The Presidential
Memorandum dated April 22, 1996,
Earth Day Initiative, Parks for Tomorrow
calls for substantial restoration of
natural quiet in the GCNP to be
achieved by 2008. ‘‘Substantial
restoration of natural quiet’’ has been
defined by the NPS to mean that 50
percent or more of the park will achieve
natural quiet (i.e., no aircraft audible)
for 75 to 100 percent of the day.
This undertaking is a follow-on to
previous actions taken by the FAA, in
cooperation with the NPS, since
December 1996.
The FAA and NPS are inviting the
public, agencies, and other interested
parties to provide comments,
suggestions, and input regarding: (1)
The scope, issues, and concerns related
to the development of proposed and
alternative actions at Grand Canyon
National Park that provide for the
substantial restoration of the natural
quiet and experience of the park and
protection of public health and safety
from significant adverse effects
associated with all aircraft overflights;
(2) past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future actions which, when
considered with any alternatives, may
result in significant cumulative impacts;
and, (3) potential alternatives.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The scoping process for this EIS will
include three public meetings and a
ninety-day comment period for
interested agencies and parties to
submit oral and/or written comments
representing the concerns and issues
they believe should be addressed. Please
submit any written comments within
ninety-days from the date of this Notice,
or no later than April 27, 2006. Address
your comments to: Docket Management
System, Doc No. FAA–2005–23402, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Room
Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
The purpose of this Notice is to
inform Federal, State, local government
agencies, and the public of the intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) and to conduct a public
and agency scoping process.
Information, data, opinions, and
comments obtained throughout the
scoping process will be considered in
preparing the Draft EIS.
To maximize the opportunities for
public participation in this
environmental process, the FAA and
NPS will also publish notices in the
major local newspapers in the vicinity
of the study area.
DATES: The scoping period, and the
opportunity to provide written
comments will extend from publication
of this Notice for a period of ninetydays. The forecast period of public and
Agency scoping is January 20, through
April 27, 2006.
Public Meetings: Public scoping
meetings will be held in Phoenix,
Arizona (AZ) on February 21, Flagstaff,
AZ on February 22, and in Las Vegas,
Nevada (NV) on February 23. Following
are the specifics for each of the public
meetings:
Phoenix—February 21, 2006; 4 p.m. to
8 p.m., Glendale Community College,
6000 W. Olive Ave., Glendale, AZ
85302;
Flagstaff—February 22; 4 p.m. to 8 p.m.,
Museum of Northern Arizona, 3101 N.
Ft. Valley Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001;
and,
Las Vegas—February 23; 4 p.m. to 8
p.m., Henderson Convention Center,
200 Water St., Henderson, NV 89015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE
CONTACT: Questions concerning the
environmental process should be
directed to either the FAA or the NPS.
The FAA contact person is Mr. Barry
Brayer. Mr. Brayer can be contacted in
writing at Federal Aviation
Administration, Executive Resource
Staff (AWP–4) 15000 Aviation Blvd., PO
Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009–
2007; or via telephone at (310) 725–
3800.
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Notices
The NPS contact person is Ms. Mary
Killeen. She can be contacted at Chief,
Office of Planning and Compliance,
Grand Canyon National Park, P.O. Box
129, Grand Canyon, AZ 86023; or via
telephone at (928) 638–7885.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
and NPS, with a working group
established under the auspices of the
National Parks Overflights Advisory
Group (NPOAG) and any cooperating
agency(ies), will develop alternatives to
meet the statutory mandate for
substantial restoration of natural quiet
to the GCNP.
In accordance with section 805 of the
National Parks Air Tour Management
Act of 2000, the Administrator of the
FAA and the Director of the NPS jointly
established the NPOAG on April 5,
2001. The NPOAG provides continuing
advice and counsel with respect to
commercial air tour operations over and
near national parks. On October 10,
2003, the FAA Administrator signed
FAA Order 1110.138, the NPOAG
Aviation Rulemaking Committee
Charter. The NPOAG is comprised of a
balanced group of representatives of
general aviation, commercial air tour
operators, environmental interests, and
American Indian tribes. Additional
information related to the NPOAG can
be found on their Web site at https://
www.atmp.faa.gov/npoag.htm.
At the request of the FAA and NPS,
the U.S. Institute of Environmental
Conflict Resolution (USIECR) began
working with the two agencies in 2003
to help develop a cooperative working
relationship to facilitate the resolution
of issues surrounding the
implementation of the Overflights Act at
Grand Canyon National Park. The
agencies agreed to move forward with
an Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) process and through the USIECR,
the firm of Lucy Moore Associates, Inc.
was contracted to assist in the ADR
process. Additionally, the two agencies
decided to create a working group,
under the authority of the NPOAG, to
assist in the process. Through notice in
the Federal Register, the agencies
invited nominations from individuals,
who met certain criteria established for
participation on the working group. The
result was the establishment of the
Grand Canyon Working Group that
consists of representatives from FAA,
NPS, air tour operators, environmental
groups, American Indian Tribes,
commercial and general aviation,
recreational interests, and other federal
agencies. The working group is
specifically tasked with developing
recommendations for proposed actions
to meet the statutory mandate contained
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Jan 24, 2006
Jkt 208001
in the Overflights Act. Information
obtained during the public scoping
process will inform and assist the
working group in developing
recommendations. The working group
will participate in the development of
the EIS and in any rulemaking that may
be required with respect to a final
overflights plan.
Further, the FAA and NPS are aware
of American Indian Tribes with ties to
the GCNP. The FAA, NPS, and Tribes
will interact on a government-togovernment basis, in accordance with
all executive orders, laws, regulations
and other memoranda. They are also
being invited to participate in the
environmental process as Cooperating
Agencies in accordance with NEPA and
section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act. To the extent
practicable, compliance with section
106 will be combined with the NEPA
process, pursuant to Title 36, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 800, sections
800.3(b), and 800.8.
The environmental process of
developing and reviewing alternatives
to achieve the substantial restoration of
natural quiet at the GCNP began in
1996. This is also the timeframe when
consultation with American Indian
Tribes with traditional cultural ties to
the park began. Data and documentation
from these previous actions have been
retained and will be utilized, as
necessary, as part of this current
undertaking. As a result of the final
rulemaking of December 31, 1996, flight
free zones, air tours and reporting
requirements were defined.
In February 2000, the FAA issued a
Supplemental Final Environmental
Assessment (SFEA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) associated
with a final rule to modify the airspace
over the GCNP, and a final rule to limit
the number of commercial air tour
operations that could be flown in that
airspace. In May 2000, the FAA
implemented the final rule limiting
commercial air tour operations.
However, the FAA determined that
implementation of the airspace and
proposed commercial air tour route
changes for the east end of the GCNP
should be delayed to address safety
concerns that had not been previously
raised by the commercial air tour
operators.
Additionally, in late-spring 2000,
litigation related to the SFEA and
FONSI was initiated. The litigation
related to the final rule for airspace was
stayed by the court pending FAA
resolution of the safety issues. However,
the Court remanded the SFEA, as it
pertained to the limitations final rule,
back to the FAA for resolution of several
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4193
issues of concern between the FAA and
NPS. Those issues have been
substantially resolved and the FAA and
NPS are ready to move forward with
this EIS to develop and evaluate
alternatives for a final overflights plan
to substantially restore natural quiet in
the GCNP.
Since 1996, there has been
considerable public participation in the
environmental processes associated
with these actions. The FAA, in
cooperation with the NPS, held
numerous meetings with the Tribes and
the public. Copies of the previous
environmental documents from 1996
through 2000 were mailed to numerous
Federal, State, and local agencies and
elected officials; Tribes; private and
public organizations and individuals;
and libraries within the study area.
As this undertaking will be a followon to the previous actions, the
December 1996 Final Environmental
Assessment and the February 2000 Final
Supplemental Environmental
Assessment may be reviewed for
additional supplemental information at
one of the following libraries to which
it was mailed:
Librarian, 113 South 1st St., Williams,
AZ 86046.
Flagstaff Public Library, Public Service/
Reference Room, 300 W. Aspen,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Fredonia Public Library, Director, P.O.
Box 217, Fredonia, AZ 86022.
Grand Canyon Community Library,
Librarian, P.O. Box 518, Grand
Canyon, AZ 86023.
Phoenix Public Library, Government
Documents, 1221 N. Central Ave.,
Phoenix, AZ 85004.
Phoenix Public Library, Arizona Room,
1221 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ
85004.
Washington County Library, Reference
Department, 50 South Main, St.
George, UT 84770.
Kanab City Library, Director, 13 South
100 East #129–6, Kanab, UT 84741.
Mohave County Library, ATTN: Lee
Smith, P.O. Box 7000, Kingman, AZ
86402–7000.
William C. Withycombe,
Western Pacific Regional Administrator,
Federal Aviation Administration.
Steve Martin,
Deputy Director, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06–708 Filed 1–20–06; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM
25JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4192-4193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-708]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for Actions To Substantially Restore Natural Quiet to the Grand
Canyon National Park and Public Scoping
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration and National Park Service.
ACTION: Notice of Intent: Request for scoping comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National
Park Service (NPS), as co-leads in the environmental process, intend to
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the provisions of
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. The EIS will
address environmental and related impacts that may result from actions
to be proposed and alternatives to be developed to achieve the
statutory mandate of Public Law 100-91 (``commonly know as the
Overflights Act''); to provide for the substantial restoration of the
natural quiet and experience of Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP). The
Presidential Memorandum dated April 22, 1996, Earth Day Initiative,
Parks for Tomorrow calls for substantial restoration of natural quiet
in the GCNP to be achieved by 2008. ``Substantial restoration of
natural quiet'' has been defined by the NPS to mean that 50 percent or
more of the park will achieve natural quiet (i.e., no aircraft audible)
for 75 to 100 percent of the day.
This undertaking is a follow-on to previous actions taken by the
FAA, in cooperation with the NPS, since December 1996.
The FAA and NPS are inviting the public, agencies, and other
interested parties to provide comments, suggestions, and input
regarding: (1) The scope, issues, and concerns related to the
development of proposed and alternative actions at Grand Canyon
National Park that provide for the substantial restoration of the
natural quiet and experience of the park and protection of public
health and safety from significant adverse effects associated with all
aircraft overflights; (2) past, present, and reasonably foreseeable
future actions which, when considered with any alternatives, may result
in significant cumulative impacts; and, (3) potential alternatives.
The scoping process for this EIS will include three public meetings
and a ninety-day comment period for interested agencies and parties to
submit oral and/or written comments representing the concerns and
issues they believe should be addressed. Please submit any written
comments within ninety-days from the date of this Notice, or no later
than April 27, 2006. Address your comments to: Docket Management
System, Doc No. FAA-2005-23402, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room
Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
The purpose of this Notice is to inform Federal, State, local
government agencies, and the public of the intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and to conduct a public and agency
scoping process. Information, data, opinions, and comments obtained
throughout the scoping process will be considered in preparing the
Draft EIS.
To maximize the opportunities for public participation in this
environmental process, the FAA and NPS will also publish notices in the
major local newspapers in the vicinity of the study area.
DATES: The scoping period, and the opportunity to provide written
comments will extend from publication of this Notice for a period of
ninety-days. The forecast period of public and Agency scoping is
January 20, through April 27, 2006.
Public Meetings: Public scoping meetings will be held in Phoenix,
Arizona (AZ) on February 21, Flagstaff, AZ on February 22, and in Las
Vegas, Nevada (NV) on February 23. Following are the specifics for each
of the public meetings:
Phoenix--February 21, 2006; 4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Glendale Community
College, 6000 W. Olive Ave., Glendale, AZ 85302;
Flagstaff--February 22; 4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Museum of Northern Arizona,
3101 N. Ft. Valley Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001; and,
Las Vegas--February 23; 4 p.m. to 8 p.m., Henderson Convention Center,
200 Water St., Henderson, NV 89015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Questions concerning the
environmental process should be directed to either the FAA or the NPS.
The FAA contact person is Mr. Barry Brayer. Mr. Brayer can be contacted
in writing at Federal Aviation Administration, Executive Resource Staff
(AWP-4) 15000 Aviation Blvd., PO Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007;
or via telephone at (310) 725-3800.
[[Page 4193]]
The NPS contact person is Ms. Mary Killeen. She can be contacted at
Chief, Office of Planning and Compliance, Grand Canyon National Park,
P.O. Box 129, Grand Canyon, AZ 86023; or via telephone at (928) 638-
7885.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA and NPS, with a working group
established under the auspices of the National Parks Overflights
Advisory Group (NPOAG) and any cooperating agency(ies), will develop
alternatives to meet the statutory mandate for substantial restoration
of natural quiet to the GCNP.
In accordance with section 805 of the National Parks Air Tour
Management Act of 2000, the Administrator of the FAA and the Director
of the NPS jointly established the NPOAG on April 5, 2001. The NPOAG
provides continuing advice and counsel with respect to commercial air
tour operations over and near national parks. On October 10, 2003, the
FAA Administrator signed FAA Order 1110.138, the NPOAG Aviation
Rulemaking Committee Charter. The NPOAG is comprised of a balanced
group of representatives of general aviation, commercial air tour
operators, environmental interests, and American Indian tribes.
Additional information related to the NPOAG can be found on their Web
site at https://www.atmp.faa.gov/npoag.htm.
At the request of the FAA and NPS, the U.S. Institute of
Environmental Conflict Resolution (USIECR) began working with the two
agencies in 2003 to help develop a cooperative working relationship to
facilitate the resolution of issues surrounding the implementation of
the Overflights Act at Grand Canyon National Park. The agencies agreed
to move forward with an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process
and through the USIECR, the firm of Lucy Moore Associates, Inc. was
contracted to assist in the ADR process. Additionally, the two agencies
decided to create a working group, under the authority of the NPOAG, to
assist in the process. Through notice in the Federal Register, the
agencies invited nominations from individuals, who met certain criteria
established for participation on the working group. The result was the
establishment of the Grand Canyon Working Group that consists of
representatives from FAA, NPS, air tour operators, environmental
groups, American Indian Tribes, commercial and general aviation,
recreational interests, and other federal agencies. The working group
is specifically tasked with developing recommendations for proposed
actions to meet the statutory mandate contained in the Overflights Act.
Information obtained during the public scoping process will inform and
assist the working group in developing recommendations. The working
group will participate in the development of the EIS and in any
rulemaking that may be required with respect to a final overflights
plan.
Further, the FAA and NPS are aware of American Indian Tribes with
ties to the GCNP. The FAA, NPS, and Tribes will interact on a
government-to-government basis, in accordance with all executive
orders, laws, regulations and other memoranda. They are also being
invited to participate in the environmental process as Cooperating
Agencies in accordance with NEPA and section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. To the extent practicable, compliance with
section 106 will be combined with the NEPA process, pursuant to Title
36, Code of Federal Regulations, part 800, sections 800.3(b), and
800.8.
The environmental process of developing and reviewing alternatives
to achieve the substantial restoration of natural quiet at the GCNP
began in 1996. This is also the timeframe when consultation with
American Indian Tribes with traditional cultural ties to the park
began. Data and documentation from these previous actions have been
retained and will be utilized, as necessary, as part of this current
undertaking. As a result of the final rulemaking of December 31, 1996,
flight free zones, air tours and reporting requirements were defined.
In February 2000, the FAA issued a Supplemental Final Environmental
Assessment (SFEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
associated with a final rule to modify the airspace over the GCNP, and
a final rule to limit the number of commercial air tour operations that
could be flown in that airspace. In May 2000, the FAA implemented the
final rule limiting commercial air tour operations. However, the FAA
determined that implementation of the airspace and proposed commercial
air tour route changes for the east end of the GCNP should be delayed
to address safety concerns that had not been previously raised by the
commercial air tour operators.
Additionally, in late-spring 2000, litigation related to the SFEA
and FONSI was initiated. The litigation related to the final rule for
airspace was stayed by the court pending FAA resolution of the safety
issues. However, the Court remanded the SFEA, as it pertained to the
limitations final rule, back to the FAA for resolution of several
issues of concern between the FAA and NPS. Those issues have been
substantially resolved and the FAA and NPS are ready to move forward
with this EIS to develop and evaluate alternatives for a final
overflights plan to substantially restore natural quiet in the GCNP.
Since 1996, there has been considerable public participation in the
environmental processes associated with these actions. The FAA, in
cooperation with the NPS, held numerous meetings with the Tribes and
the public. Copies of the previous environmental documents from 1996
through 2000 were mailed to numerous Federal, State, and local agencies
and elected officials; Tribes; private and public organizations and
individuals; and libraries within the study area.
As this undertaking will be a follow-on to the previous actions,
the December 1996 Final Environmental Assessment and the February 2000
Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment may be reviewed for
additional supplemental information at one of the following libraries
to which it was mailed:
Librarian, 113 South 1st St., Williams, AZ 86046.
Flagstaff Public Library, Public Service/Reference Room, 300 W. Aspen,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Fredonia Public Library, Director, P.O. Box 217, Fredonia, AZ 86022.
Grand Canyon Community Library, Librarian, P.O. Box 518, Grand Canyon,
AZ 86023.
Phoenix Public Library, Government Documents, 1221 N. Central Ave.,
Phoenix, AZ 85004.
Phoenix Public Library, Arizona Room, 1221 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ
85004.
Washington County Library, Reference Department, 50 South Main, St.
George, UT 84770.
Kanab City Library, Director, 13 South 100 East 129-6, Kanab,
UT 84741.
Mohave County Library, ATTN: Lee Smith, P.O. Box 7000, Kingman, AZ
86402-7000.
William C. Withycombe,
Western Pacific Regional Administrator, Federal Aviation
Administration.
Steve Martin,
Deputy Director, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 06-708 Filed 1-20-06; 2:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P