Rule Title: Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Registration Fee Change, 3762-3763 [06-667]

Download as PDF 3762 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES approaches are the Area Navigation (Global Positioning System) (RNAV (GPS)) Runway (RWY) 01, original, (2) RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, original. The unnamed revised DP is published in the front of the U.S. Terminal Procedures Alaska Vol 1. Class E controlled airspace extending upward from 700 ft. above the surface in the Holy Cross Airport area is modified by this action. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No public comments have been received; thus the rule is adopted as proposed. The area will be depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot reference. The coordinates for this airspace docket are based on North American Datum 83. The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1,200 ft. transition areas are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9N, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated September 1, 2005, and effective September 15, 2005, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. The Rule This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 modifies Class E airspace at Holy Cross, Alaska. This Class E airspace is modified to accommodate aircraft executing two new SIAPs, and one revised DP and will be depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot reference. The intended effect of this rule is to provide adequate controlled airspace for Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at Holy Cross Airport, Holy Cross, Alaska. The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore—(1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it creates Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain aircraft executing instrument procedures for the Holy Cross Airport and represents the FAA’s continuing effort to safely and efficiently use the navigable airspace. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: I PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9N, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated September 1, 2005, and effective September 15, 2005, is amended as follows: * * * * * I Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the earth. * * * AAL AK E5 * * Holy Cross, AK [Revised] Holy Cross Airport, AK (Lat. 62°11′18″ N., long. 159°46′30″ W.) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile radius of the Holy Cross Airport. * PO 00000 * * Frm 00010 * Fmt 4700 * Sfmt 4700 Issued in Anchorage, AK, on January 13, 2006. Anthony M. Wylie, Manager, Safety, Area Flight Service Operations. [FR Doc. 06–592 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE 22 CFR Parts 122 and 129 [Public Notice: 5278] RIN 1400–AB97 Rule Title: Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Registration Fee Change AGENCY: ACTION: Department of State. Final rule. SUMMARY: This rule makes final the interim rule that amended the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR Parts 122 and 129) by increasing the registration fees, changing the registration renewal period, and making other minor administrative changes. Comments received on the interim rule are analyzed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. No changes were made to the interim rule. Effective Date: The interim rule is adopted as final February 23, 2006. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Trimble, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State, Washington, DC 20522–0112, 202–663–2807 or FAX 202–261–8199. ATTN: ITAR Regulatory Change, 22 CFR part 122 and part 129. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 8, 2004, the Department of State published an interim rule (Public Notice 4920; 69 FR 70888), with a request for comments, amending the ITAR (22 CFR parts 122 and 129) by increasing the registration fees, changing the registration renewal period, and making other minor administrative changes. The administration of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), regulations for which are set forth in the ITAR, is a foreign affairs function. The Department received 43 comments from ITAR registrants and defense-related associations. E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM 24JAR1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations Comment Analysis Impact on Small Business and Fee Relief The majority of comments received concerned the fee increase’s impact on small businesses. The comments provided noted the burden the fee increase would place on small businesses, and some sought relief from the increase. Prior to the publication of the interim rule, the Department fully considered the financial burden the fee increase would place on industry and small businesses when it decided upon the new fee structure, and concluded that the impact would be minimal for the majority of the registrants. In addition, as noted in the Regulatory Findings and Notice section, the Department has found that this fee increase will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and export markets. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES Rational for Increasing Registration Fees Ten comments were received regarding the rationale for increasing the registration fee. The Department has increased the ITAR registration fee to help fund the activities of its Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), as set forth in 22 U.S.C. 2717. In particular, the additional revenue will assist DDTC in achieving its goals of expanded automation, compliance, training, and quality assurance. The additional resources will enable DDTC to serve the export community with greater efficiency. This increase in registration fees is the first increase since 1997. Registration Requirements Three comments were received regarding whether particular entities must register with DDTC. The interim rule and this final rule address an increase in the registration fee, the registration renewal period, and other minor administrative changes. The regulations pertaining to who must register with DDTC remain unchanged. Pursuant to 22 CFR 122.1, any person who engages in the United States in the business of either manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense services is required to register with the Office (now Directorate) of Defense Trade Controls. Manufacturers VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Jan 23, 2006 Jkt 208001 who do not engage in exporting must nevertheless register. In addition, 22 CFR 129.1 states that section 38(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) provides that persons engaged in the business of brokering activities shall register and pay a registration fee. Furthermore, 22 CFR 129.2 states that, inter alia, brokering activities include activities by U.S. persons who are located inside or outside of the United States or foreign persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction involving defense articles or defense services of U.S. or foreign origin, which are located inside or outside of the United States. Rationale for Two-Year Registration Two comments were received requesting the retention of the option to register up to a maximum period of four years. DDTC has reduced the maximum registration period to two years because the increased volume of mergers and acquisitions by regulated companies has made it more difficult to maintain accurate information on registrants. Also, DDTC encountered problems with companies not updating their registration, except at the time of their renewal, as required by 22 CFR 129.4(c). The change from a four-year to a twoyear maximum registration period will improve the currency and accuracy of the registrants’ information, which is critical to all licensing decisions. List of Subjects 22 CFR Part 122 Arms and munitions, Exports. 22 CFR Part 129 Arms and munitions, Exports, Technical assistance. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the interim rule published at 69 FR 70888 is adopted as final. Dated: Decemher 21, 2005. Robert G. Joseph, Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of State. [FR Doc. 06–667 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4710–25–P PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 3763 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [CGD05–06–004] RIN 1625–AA–09 Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Elizabeth River, Eastern Branch, VA Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of temporary deviation from regulations. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, has approved a temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the Berkley Bridge, at mile 0.4, across the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River in Norfolk, Virginia. To facilitate electrical repairs, this deviation allows the drawbridge to remain closed-tonavigation from 7 a.m. on February 7, 2006, to 7 a.m. on February 8, 2006 and from 7 a.m. on February 14, 2006, to 7 a.m. on February 15, 2006. DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. on February 7, 2006, to 7 a.m. on February 15, 2006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Heyer, Bridge Management Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398– 6629. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Berkley Bridge, a lift-type drawbridge, has a vertical clearance in the closed position to vessels of 48 feet, at mean high water. The bridge owner, the Virginia Department of Transportation, has requested a temporary deviation from the current operating regulation set out in 33 CFR 117.1007, to effect electrical repairs of the draw span. To facilitate the repairs, the drawbridge will be closed to navigation from 7 a.m. on February 7, 2006, to 7 a.m. on February 8, 2006 and from 7 a.m. on February 14, 2006, to 7 a.m. on February 15, 2006. During these periods, the repairs require immobilizing the operation of the lift span in the closedto-navigation position. At all other times, the drawbridge will operate in accordance with the current operating regulations outlined in 33 CFR 117.1007. The Coast Guard has informed the known users of the waterway so that they can arrange their transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation. In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM 24JAR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3762-3763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-667]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Parts 122 and 129

[Public Notice: 5278]
RIN 1400-AB97


Rule Title: Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms 
Regulations: Registration Fee Change

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule makes final the interim rule that amended the 
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR Parts 122 and 
129) by increasing the registration fees, changing the registration 
renewal period, and making other minor administrative changes. Comments 
received on the interim rule are analyzed in the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION section. No changes were made to the interim rule.

DATES: Effective Date: The interim rule is adopted as final February 
23, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Trimble, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department 
of State, Washington, DC 20522-0112, 202-663-2807 or FAX 202-261-8199. 
ATTN: ITAR Regulatory Change, 22 CFR part 122 and part 129.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 8, 2004, the Department of State published an interim 
rule (Public Notice 4920; 69 FR 70888), with a request for comments, 
amending the ITAR (22 CFR parts 122 and 129) by increasing the 
registration fees, changing the registration renewal period, and making 
other minor administrative changes. The administration of the Arms 
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), regulations for which are 
set forth in the ITAR, is a foreign affairs function. The Department 
received 43 comments from ITAR registrants and defense-related 
associations.

[[Page 3763]]

Comment Analysis

Impact on Small Business and Fee Relief

    The majority of comments received concerned the fee increase's 
impact on small businesses. The comments provided noted the burden the 
fee increase would place on small businesses, and some sought relief 
from the increase. Prior to the publication of the interim rule, the 
Department fully considered the financial burden the fee increase would 
place on industry and small businesses when it decided upon the new fee 
structure, and concluded that the impact would be minimal for the 
majority of the registrants. In addition, as noted in the Regulatory 
Findings and Notice section, the Department has found that this fee 
increase will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 
million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, 
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or 
geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of 
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based 
enterprises in domestic and export markets.

Rational for Increasing Registration Fees

    Ten comments were received regarding the rationale for increasing 
the registration fee. The Department has increased the ITAR 
registration fee to help fund the activities of its Directorate of 
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), as set forth in 22 U.S.C. 2717. In 
particular, the additional revenue will assist DDTC in achieving its 
goals of expanded automation, compliance, training, and quality 
assurance. The additional resources will enable DDTC to serve the 
export community with greater efficiency. This increase in registration 
fees is the first increase since 1997.

Registration Requirements

    Three comments were received regarding whether particular entities 
must register with DDTC. The interim rule and this final rule address 
an increase in the registration fee, the registration renewal period, 
and other minor administrative changes. The regulations pertaining to 
who must register with DDTC remain unchanged. Pursuant to 22 CFR 122.1, 
any person who engages in the United States in the business of either 
manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense 
services is required to register with the Office (now Directorate) of 
Defense Trade Controls. Manufacturers who do not engage in exporting 
must nevertheless register. In addition, 22 CFR 129.1 states that 
section 38(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) 
provides that persons engaged in the business of brokering activities 
shall register and pay a registration fee. Furthermore, 22 CFR 129.2 
states that, inter alia, brokering activities include activities by 
U.S. persons who are located inside or outside of the United States or 
foreign persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction involving defense articles 
or defense services of U.S. or foreign origin, which are located inside 
or outside of the United States.

Rationale for Two-Year Registration

    Two comments were received requesting the retention of the option 
to register up to a maximum period of four years. DDTC has reduced the 
maximum registration period to two years because the increased volume 
of mergers and acquisitions by regulated companies has made it more 
difficult to maintain accurate information on registrants. Also, DDTC 
encountered problems with companies not updating their registration, 
except at the time of their renewal, as required by 22 CFR 129.4(c). 
The change from a four-year to a two-year maximum registration period 
will improve the currency and accuracy of the registrants' information, 
which is critical to all licensing decisions.

List of Subjects

22 CFR Part 122

    Arms and munitions, Exports.

22 CFR Part 129

    Arms and munitions, Exports, Technical assistance.
    Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the interim rule 
published at 69 FR 70888 is adopted as final.

    Dated: Decemher 21, 2005.
Robert G. Joseph,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 06-667 Filed 1-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.