Rule Title: Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Registration Fee Change, 3762-3763 [06-667]
Download as PDF
3762
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
approaches are the Area Navigation
(Global Positioning System) (RNAV
(GPS)) Runway (RWY) 01, original, (2)
RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, original. The
unnamed revised DP is published in the
front of the U.S. Terminal Procedures
Alaska Vol 1. Class E controlled
airspace extending upward from 700 ft.
above the surface in the Holy Cross
Airport area is modified by this action.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No public comments have been
received; thus the rule is adopted as
proposed.
The area will be depicted on
aeronautical charts for pilot reference.
The coordinates for this airspace docket
are based on North American Datum 83.
The Class E airspace areas designated as
700/1,200 ft. transition areas are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9N, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated September
1, 2005, and effective September 15,
2005, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this
document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 71
modifies Class E airspace at Holy Cross,
Alaska. This Class E airspace is
modified to accommodate aircraft
executing two new SIAPs, and one
revised DP and will be depicted on
aeronautical charts for pilot reference.
The intended effect of this rule is to
provide adequate controlled airspace for
Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations
at Holy Cross Airport, Holy Cross,
Alaska.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Jan 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
with prescribing regulations to ensure
the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace. This regulation is
within the scope of that authority
because it creates Class E airspace
sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the
Holy Cross Airport and represents the
FAA’s continuing effort to safely and
efficiently use the navigable airspace.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
I
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9N,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated September 1, 2005, and
effective September 15, 2005, is
amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
I
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet or more above the
surface of the earth.
*
*
*
AAL AK E5
*
*
Holy Cross, AK [Revised]
Holy Cross Airport, AK
(Lat. 62°11′18″ N., long. 159°46′30″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile
radius of the Holy Cross Airport.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00010
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Anchorage, AK, on January 13,
2006.
Anthony M. Wylie,
Manager, Safety, Area Flight Service
Operations.
[FR Doc. 06–592 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 122 and 129
[Public Notice: 5278]
RIN 1400–AB97
Rule Title: Amendment to the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Registration Fee Change
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of State.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This rule makes final the
interim rule that amended the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR Parts 122
and 129) by increasing the registration
fees, changing the registration renewal
period, and making other minor
administrative changes. Comments
received on the interim rule are
analyzed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. No changes were
made to the interim rule.
Effective Date: The interim rule
is adopted as final February 23, 2006.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Trimble, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, Department of
State, Washington, DC 20522–0112,
202–663–2807 or FAX 202–261–8199.
ATTN: ITAR Regulatory Change, 22 CFR
part 122 and part 129.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 8, 2004, the Department
of State published an interim rule
(Public Notice 4920; 69 FR 70888), with
a request for comments, amending the
ITAR (22 CFR parts 122 and 129) by
increasing the registration fees,
changing the registration renewal
period, and making other minor
administrative changes. The
administration of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.),
regulations for which are set forth in the
ITAR, is a foreign affairs function. The
Department received 43 comments from
ITAR registrants and defense-related
associations.
E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM
24JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 24, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Comment Analysis
Impact on Small Business and Fee
Relief
The majority of comments received
concerned the fee increase’s impact on
small businesses. The comments
provided noted the burden the fee
increase would place on small
businesses, and some sought relief from
the increase. Prior to the publication of
the interim rule, the Department fully
considered the financial burden the fee
increase would place on industry and
small businesses when it decided upon
the new fee structure, and concluded
that the impact would be minimal for
the majority of the registrants. In
addition, as noted in the Regulatory
Findings and Notice section, the
Department has found that this fee
increase will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more; a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic
regions; or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Rational for Increasing Registration Fees
Ten comments were received
regarding the rationale for increasing the
registration fee. The Department has
increased the ITAR registration fee to
help fund the activities of its Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), as set
forth in 22 U.S.C. 2717. In particular,
the additional revenue will assist DDTC
in achieving its goals of expanded
automation, compliance, training, and
quality assurance. The additional
resources will enable DDTC to serve the
export community with greater
efficiency. This increase in registration
fees is the first increase since 1997.
Registration Requirements
Three comments were received
regarding whether particular entities
must register with DDTC. The interim
rule and this final rule address an
increase in the registration fee, the
registration renewal period, and other
minor administrative changes. The
regulations pertaining to who must
register with DDTC remain unchanged.
Pursuant to 22 CFR 122.1, any person
who engages in the United States in the
business of either manufacturing or
exporting defense articles or furnishing
defense services is required to register
with the Office (now Directorate) of
Defense Trade Controls. Manufacturers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Jan 23, 2006
Jkt 208001
who do not engage in exporting must
nevertheless register. In addition, 22
CFR 129.1 states that section
38(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778) provides
that persons engaged in the business of
brokering activities shall register and
pay a registration fee. Furthermore, 22
CFR 129.2 states that, inter alia,
brokering activities include activities by
U.S. persons who are located inside or
outside of the United States or foreign
persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction
involving defense articles or defense
services of U.S. or foreign origin, which
are located inside or outside of the
United States.
Rationale for Two-Year Registration
Two comments were received
requesting the retention of the option to
register up to a maximum period of four
years. DDTC has reduced the maximum
registration period to two years because
the increased volume of mergers and
acquisitions by regulated companies has
made it more difficult to maintain
accurate information on registrants.
Also, DDTC encountered problems with
companies not updating their
registration, except at the time of their
renewal, as required by 22 CFR 129.4(c).
The change from a four-year to a twoyear maximum registration period will
improve the currency and accuracy of
the registrants’ information, which is
critical to all licensing decisions.
List of Subjects
22 CFR Part 122
Arms and munitions, Exports.
22 CFR Part 129
Arms and munitions, Exports,
Technical assistance.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, the interim rule published at 69
FR 70888 is adopted as final.
Dated: Decemher 21, 2005.
Robert G. Joseph,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06–667 Filed 1–23–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3763
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD05–06–004]
RIN 1625–AA–09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Elizabeth River, Eastern Branch, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District, has approved a
temporary deviation from the
regulations governing the operation of
the Berkley Bridge, at mile 0.4, across
the Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth
River in Norfolk, Virginia. To facilitate
electrical repairs, this deviation allows
the drawbridge to remain closed-tonavigation from 7 a.m. on February 7,
2006, to 7 a.m. on February 8, 2006 and
from 7 a.m. on February 14, 2006, to 7
a.m. on February 15, 2006.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7 a.m. on February 7, 2006, to 7 a.m. on
February 15, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Heyer, Bridge Management Specialist,
Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398–
6629.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Berkley Bridge, a lift-type drawbridge,
has a vertical clearance in the closed
position to vessels of 48 feet, at mean
high water.
The bridge owner, the Virginia
Department of Transportation, has
requested a temporary deviation from
the current operating regulation set out
in 33 CFR 117.1007, to effect electrical
repairs of the draw span.
To facilitate the repairs, the
drawbridge will be closed to navigation
from 7 a.m. on February 7, 2006, to 7
a.m. on February 8, 2006 and from 7
a.m. on February 14, 2006, to 7 a.m. on
February 15, 2006. During these periods,
the repairs require immobilizing the
operation of the lift span in the closedto-navigation position. At all other
times, the drawbridge will operate in
accordance with the current operating
regulations outlined in 33 CFR
117.1007.
The Coast Guard has informed the
known users of the waterway so that
they can arrange their transits to
minimize any impact caused by the
temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
E:\FR\FM\24JAR1.SGM
24JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 15 (Tuesday, January 24, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3762-3763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 122 and 129
[Public Notice: 5278]
RIN 1400-AB97
Rule Title: Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Registration Fee Change
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes final the interim rule that amended the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR Parts 122 and
129) by increasing the registration fees, changing the registration
renewal period, and making other minor administrative changes. Comments
received on the interim rule are analyzed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. No changes were made to the interim rule.
DATES: Effective Date: The interim rule is adopted as final February
23, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Trimble, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Compliance, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department
of State, Washington, DC 20522-0112, 202-663-2807 or FAX 202-261-8199.
ATTN: ITAR Regulatory Change, 22 CFR part 122 and part 129.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 8, 2004, the Department of State published an interim
rule (Public Notice 4920; 69 FR 70888), with a request for comments,
amending the ITAR (22 CFR parts 122 and 129) by increasing the
registration fees, changing the registration renewal period, and making
other minor administrative changes. The administration of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.), regulations for which are
set forth in the ITAR, is a foreign affairs function. The Department
received 43 comments from ITAR registrants and defense-related
associations.
[[Page 3763]]
Comment Analysis
Impact on Small Business and Fee Relief
The majority of comments received concerned the fee increase's
impact on small businesses. The comments provided noted the burden the
fee increase would place on small businesses, and some sought relief
from the increase. Prior to the publication of the interim rule, the
Department fully considered the financial burden the fee increase would
place on industry and small businesses when it decided upon the new fee
structure, and concluded that the impact would be minimal for the
majority of the registrants. In addition, as noted in the Regulatory
Findings and Notice section, the Department has found that this fee
increase will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or
geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises in domestic and export markets.
Rational for Increasing Registration Fees
Ten comments were received regarding the rationale for increasing
the registration fee. The Department has increased the ITAR
registration fee to help fund the activities of its Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), as set forth in 22 U.S.C. 2717. In
particular, the additional revenue will assist DDTC in achieving its
goals of expanded automation, compliance, training, and quality
assurance. The additional resources will enable DDTC to serve the
export community with greater efficiency. This increase in registration
fees is the first increase since 1997.
Registration Requirements
Three comments were received regarding whether particular entities
must register with DDTC. The interim rule and this final rule address
an increase in the registration fee, the registration renewal period,
and other minor administrative changes. The regulations pertaining to
who must register with DDTC remain unchanged. Pursuant to 22 CFR 122.1,
any person who engages in the United States in the business of either
manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense
services is required to register with the Office (now Directorate) of
Defense Trade Controls. Manufacturers who do not engage in exporting
must nevertheless register. In addition, 22 CFR 129.1 states that
section 38(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778)
provides that persons engaged in the business of brokering activities
shall register and pay a registration fee. Furthermore, 22 CFR 129.2
states that, inter alia, brokering activities include activities by
U.S. persons who are located inside or outside of the United States or
foreign persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction involving defense articles
or defense services of U.S. or foreign origin, which are located inside
or outside of the United States.
Rationale for Two-Year Registration
Two comments were received requesting the retention of the option
to register up to a maximum period of four years. DDTC has reduced the
maximum registration period to two years because the increased volume
of mergers and acquisitions by regulated companies has made it more
difficult to maintain accurate information on registrants. Also, DDTC
encountered problems with companies not updating their registration,
except at the time of their renewal, as required by 22 CFR 129.4(c).
The change from a four-year to a two-year maximum registration period
will improve the currency and accuracy of the registrants' information,
which is critical to all licensing decisions.
List of Subjects
22 CFR Part 122
Arms and munitions, Exports.
22 CFR Part 129
Arms and munitions, Exports, Technical assistance.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, the interim rule
published at 69 FR 70888 is adopted as final.
Dated: Decemher 21, 2005.
Robert G. Joseph,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 06-667 Filed 1-23-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P