Notice of Availability for the Draft 2006 Supplemental Environmental Assessment to the 2002 Rim of the Pacific Programmatic Environmental Assessment, Hawaii, 3276-3277 [E6-647]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
3276
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
Tiered Environmental Impact Statement
(FTEIS) and Dredged Material
Management Plan (DMMP) to analyze
dredged material placement for the Port
of Baltimore for 20 years of maintenance
and new work dredging. USACE is
making the document available to the
public through a Notice of Availability
published in the Federal Register. The
overall goal of the DMMP is to develop
a plan to maintain, in an economically
and environmentally sound manner,
channels necessary for navigation for
the Port of Baltimore, conduct dredged
material placement in the most
environmentally sound manner, and
maximize the use of dredged material as
a beneficial resource. The
recommendations which will provide a
minimum of 20 years of dredged
material placement capacity for the Port
of Baltimore are:
• Continued maintenance dredging of
the Virginia channels and use of the
existing open-water placement sites in
Virginia (Dam Neck Open Water
Placement; Rappahannock Shoal Deep
Alternate Open Water Placement; and
Wolf Trap Alternate Open Water
Placement).
• Continued maintenance dredging of
the Maryland channels and use of the
existing sites in Maryland including
Pooles Island Open Water Site, HartMiller Island Dredged Material
Containment Facility (HMI DMCF), Cox
Creek Confined Disposal Facility (CDF)
(+36 ft dike height), and Poplar Island
Environmental Restoration Project
(PIERP).
• Multiple confined disposal facilities
for harbor material in Patapsco River.
• PIERP Expansion in Talbot County,
Maryland.
• Large Island Restoration in Middle
Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.
• Wetland Restoration in Dorchester
County, Maryland.
• Continue to pursue opportunities to
innovatively use dredged material.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Baltimore District, Attn: Mr.
Mark Mendelsohn, Planning Division,
P.O. Box 1715, Baltimore, MD 21203–
1715, or electronically to
Mark.Mendelsohn@usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Mendelsohn, Biologist, USACE,
Baltimore District, Planning Division,
(410) 962–9499 or (800) 295–1610.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A key
mission of the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers is to provide safe, reliable,
and efficient waterborne transportation
systems (channels, harbors, and
waterways) for movement of commerce,
national security needs, and recreation.
Accomplishing this successfully
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
requires dredging of channels to
adequately meet the needs of
waterborne transportation. Operating
and maintaining the nation’s harbors
and waterways, which includes the
placement and/or management of
dredged material, is an increasingly
challenging task. USACE continues its
priority mission to plan and implement
sound management of dredged
materials.
Since 1824, the USACE Baltimore
District has been actively involved in
constructing and maintaining a system
of channels to allow large, deep-draft
commercial shipping vessels to call on
the Port of Baltimore. In addition to the
shipping channels, a number of
anchorage areas were established within
the Port of Baltimore for vessels
requiring layover. The existing project
for the Baltimore Harbor and Channels
was authorized by the River and Harbor
Act of August 8, 1917 and was modified
by the River and Harbor Acts of January
1927, July 1930, October 1940, March
1945, July 1958, and December 1970.
The USACE Engineering Regulation
(ER) 1105–2–100 mandates that the
USACE Districts develop a DMMP for
all federally maintained navigation
harbor projects where there is an
indication of insufficient placement
capacity to accommodate maintenance
dredging for the next 20 years. The
DMMP is a planning document that
ensures maintenance-dredging activities
are performed in an environmentally
acceptable manner, use sound
engineering techniques, and are
economically justified. A DMMP
addresses a full range of placement
alternatives, leading to the selection of
a final plan that ensures that sufficient
placement capacity is available for the
next 20 years.
The DMMP for the Baltimore Harbor
and Channels project has been
developed using a consistent and logical
procedure by which dredged material
management alternatives have been
identified, evaluated, screened, and
recommended so that dredged material
placement operations are conducted in
a timely, environmentally sensitive, and
cost-effective manner.
A Notice of Intent to prepare and
Environmental Impact Statement was
published in the Federal Register in
May 2002 and scoping meetings were
held in June 2002. The public was
invited to provide oral comments at the
scoping meetings and to submit
additional comments to the Baltimore
District. The Draft TEIS was distributed
to the public on February 9, 2005. Two
public meetings on the Draft TEIS were
held in March 2005. All persons and
organizations that have an interest in
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the DMMP were urged to participate in
one or both meetings.
The Final TEIS may be viewed on the
Baltimore District’s Web page at
http:
//www.nab.usace.army.mil/projects//
DMMP/. USACE has
distributed copies of the TEIS to
appropriate members of Congress, State
and local government officials, Federal
agencies, and other interested parties.
Copies are available for public review at
the following locations:
(1) Queen Anne’s Public Library,
Stevensville Branch, 200 Library Circle,
Stevensville, MD 21666.
(2) Baltimore County Public Library,
1110 Eastern Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21221.
(3) Anne Arundel County Public
Library, 1410 West Street, Annapolis,
MD 21401.
(4) St. Mary’s County Public Library,
23250 Hollywood Road, Leonardtown,
MD 20650.
(5) Somerset County Public Library,
11767 Beachwood St., Princess Anne,
MD 21853.
(6) Dorchester County Public Library,
303 Gay Street, Cambridge, MD 21613.
For information on this document or
to obtain copies, please contact Mr.
Mark Mendelsohn (see ADDRESSES).
The Final TEIS has been prepared in
accordance with (1) The National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), and
(3) USACE regulations implementing
NEPA (ER–200–2–2). A record of
decision (ROD) for this project will not
be signed until at least 30 days from the
date of EPA’s notice of availability
publication in the Federal Register.
Mark Mendelsohn,
Biologist, Baltimore District,
USACE.
[FR Doc. 06–484 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–41–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Availability for the Draft 2006
Supplemental Environmental
Assessment to the 2002 Rim of the
Pacific Programmatic Environmental
Assessment, Hawaii
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR, Parts 1500–1508) implementing
the procedural provisions of NEPA, the
United States Department of the Navy
(Navy) gives notice that a draft
Supplement to the Programmatic
Environmental Assessment
(Supplemental PEA) has been prepared
to evaluate the environmental impacts
associated with implementation of the
2006 Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC)
exercises. RIMPAC 2006 is scheduled to
be conducted from about June 26 to July
28, 2006. The United States National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS),
National Atmospheric and Oceanic
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce, is a cooperating agency in
the preparation of this draft
Supplemental PEA.
DATES: Written comments on the draft
EA are requested not later than February
21, 2006. Comments should be specific
as possible. Comments should be mailed
to: Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet
(N01CE1), 251 Makalapa Drive, Pearl
Harbor, HI 96860. For additional
information, write to the above address
or call Pacific Fleet Environmental
Office at 808-474–7836.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Supplemental
PEA addressing the proposed action are
available by written request to the above
address. Copies of the draft
Supplemental PEA are also available for
public review at the project Web site at
https://www.smdcen.us/rimpac06/. In
addition, the document may be
reviewed at the following locations:
1. Wailuku Public Library, 251 High
Street, Wailuku, HI 96793 (Maui).
2. Hilo Public Library, 300
Waianaenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720.
3. Hawaii State Library, Hawaii and
Pacific Section Document Unit, 478
South King Street, Honolulu, HI 96813
(Oahu).
4. Lihue Public Library, 4344 Hardy
Street, Lihue, HI 96766 (Kauai).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pacific Fleet Environmental Office at
808–474–7836 or write to Commander,
U.S. Pacific Fleet (N01CE1), 251
Makalapa Drive, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RIMPAC
has been conducted at various locations
throughout the State of Hawaii and
surrounding ocean areas biennially for
the last 36 years. The purpose of
RIMPAC is to implement a selected set
of exercise activities that are combined
into a multinational, sea control/power
projection Fleet training exercise in a
multi-threat environment. RIMPAC
exercises enhance the abilities of a
multinational Fleet force to
communicate and operate in simulated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
hostile scenarios. In 2002, a
Programmatic EA (PEA) was prepared in
support of the RIMPAC exercises. The
PEA identified the Proposed Action as
the set of exercises and locations that
would be used for RIMPAC activities for
the foreseeable future. It identified the
maximum usage of ongoing training
assets and exercises that could be
conducted within a given RIMPAC
event and evaluated the impacts on the
environment within those bounds. The
FONSI for the RIMPAC PEA, signed
June 11, 2002, concluded that as long as
future RIMPAC exercises did not exceed
the evaluated set of activities, the
Proposed Action could be implemented
without supplemental NEPA
documentation. Thus, the scope of each
future RIMPAC exercise has been
evaluated for any emergent science
affecting impact analysis and for
consistency with the 2002 RIMPAC PEA
and its FONSI.
The 2006 Supplement to the 2002
RIMPAC PEA was prepared to evaluate
additional training event locations and
to review all proposed RIMPAC 2006
activities to the analysis in the 2002
RIMPAC PEA and a 2004 Supplement to
ensure all proposed activities are
addressed. The review included an
evaluation of: training levels (personnel
and equipment) and types of equipment;
facilities and procedures for
implementing RIMPAC at each
installation or range; and changes in the
affected environment or environmental
sensitivities. In addition, the 2006
Supplemental PEA also includes a
description of the Antisubmarine
Warfare (ASW) operations, and the
ASW acoustic effects modeling
completed for RIMPAC 2006.
The only change being proposed is
the location for conducting the NonCombatant Evacuation Operation (NEO)
at the Pacific Missile Range Facility
(PMRF) and Niihau. No new training
events are proposed. The NEO training
event locations at PMRF and Niihau,
when added to the Proposed Action
assessed in the RIMPAC PEA and 2004
Supplement, form the Proposed Action
for the purpose of the draft 2006
Supplemental PEA.
Accordingly, the analysis conducted
in the draft Supplemental PEA focused
on the following resources: terrestrial
and marine environments and cultural
resources. Specifically, the 2006
Supplemental PEA includes analysis
related to mid-frequency active sonar
based on application of emergent
science. Long-term studies of the
quantification and effects of exposure of
marine mammal species to acoustic
emissions are progressing, and Navy, in
coordination with the NMFS, is
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3277
incorporating the results into this
Supplemental PEA. The Antisubmarine
Warfare (ASW) training events being
analyzed are not new and have taken
place with no significant changes over
the previous 19 RIMPAC exercises.
However, new scientific information has
led to the ability to quantitatively
identify harassment levels, as defined in
the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), through the use of newly
derived threshold criteria metrics.
Additionally, scientific advances in
effects-analysis modeling of sound on
marine mammals have provided Navy
the ability to predict cumulative effects
on marine species due to a proposed
action. Due to these advances in
scientific information, the 2006
Supplemental PEA provides an effectsanalysis on marine mammals that may
be affected by the RIMPAC training
events that use mid-frequency active
sonar.
Based on the assumptions and
analyses in the draft SPEA, the
proposed action appears to have no
significant impacts on the environment.
However, Navy will consider and
incorporate public comments into the
final SPEA before making a decision on
the environmental significance of the
proposed action. If warranted, a Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will
be prepared and the final Supplemental
PEA and FONSI will be made available
for public review on or about May 5,
2006.
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Eric McDonald,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–647 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent (NOI) To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Use
of a More Efficient Shipping Container
System for Spent Nuclear Fuel From
Naval Aircraft Carriers
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for Implementing
the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and the Chief of
Naval Operations Environmental and
Natural Resources Program Manual
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3276-3277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-647]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Availability for the Draft 2006 Supplemental
Environmental Assessment to the 2002 Rim of the Pacific Programmatic
Environmental Assessment, Hawaii
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy
[[Page 3277]]
Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations
(40 CFR, Parts 1500-1508) implementing the procedural provisions of
NEPA, the United States Department of the Navy (Navy) gives notice that
a draft Supplement to the Programmatic Environmental Assessment
(Supplemental PEA) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental
impacts associated with implementation of the 2006 Rim of the Pacific
(RIMPAC) exercises. RIMPAC 2006 is scheduled to be conducted from about
June 26 to July 28, 2006. The United States National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce, is a cooperating agency in the preparation of
this draft Supplemental PEA.
DATES: Written comments on the draft EA are requested not later than
February 21, 2006. Comments should be specific as possible. Comments
should be mailed to: Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet (N01CE1), 251
Makalapa Drive, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860. For additional information,
write to the above address or call Pacific Fleet Environmental Office
at 808-474-7836.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Supplemental PEA addressing the proposed
action are available by written request to the above address. Copies of
the draft Supplemental PEA are also available for public review at the
project Web site at https://www.smdcen.us/rimpac06/. In addition, the
document may be reviewed at the following locations:
1. Wailuku Public Library, 251 High Street, Wailuku, HI 96793
(Maui).
2. Hilo Public Library, 300 Waianaenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720.
3. Hawaii State Library, Hawaii and Pacific Section Document Unit,
478 South King Street, Honolulu, HI 96813 (Oahu).
4. Lihue Public Library, 4344 Hardy Street, Lihue, HI 96766
(Kauai).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pacific Fleet Environmental Office at
808-474-7836 or write to Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet (N01CE1), 251
Makalapa Drive, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: RIMPAC has been conducted at various
locations throughout the State of Hawaii and surrounding ocean areas
biennially for the last 36 years. The purpose of RIMPAC is to implement
a selected set of exercise activities that are combined into a
multinational, sea control/power projection Fleet training exercise in
a multi-threat environment. RIMPAC exercises enhance the abilities of a
multinational Fleet force to communicate and operate in simulated
hostile scenarios. In 2002, a Programmatic EA (PEA) was prepared in
support of the RIMPAC exercises. The PEA identified the Proposed Action
as the set of exercises and locations that would be used for RIMPAC
activities for the foreseeable future. It identified the maximum usage
of ongoing training assets and exercises that could be conducted within
a given RIMPAC event and evaluated the impacts on the environment
within those bounds. The FONSI for the RIMPAC PEA, signed June 11,
2002, concluded that as long as future RIMPAC exercises did not exceed
the evaluated set of activities, the Proposed Action could be
implemented without supplemental NEPA documentation. Thus, the scope of
each future RIMPAC exercise has been evaluated for any emergent science
affecting impact analysis and for consistency with the 2002 RIMPAC PEA
and its FONSI.
The 2006 Supplement to the 2002 RIMPAC PEA was prepared to evaluate
additional training event locations and to review all proposed RIMPAC
2006 activities to the analysis in the 2002 RIMPAC PEA and a 2004
Supplement to ensure all proposed activities are addressed. The review
included an evaluation of: training levels (personnel and equipment)
and types of equipment; facilities and procedures for implementing
RIMPAC at each installation or range; and changes in the affected
environment or environmental sensitivities. In addition, the 2006
Supplemental PEA also includes a description of the Antisubmarine
Warfare (ASW) operations, and the ASW acoustic effects modeling
completed for RIMPAC 2006.
The only change being proposed is the location for conducting the
Non-Combatant Evacuation Operation (NEO) at the Pacific Missile Range
Facility (PMRF) and Niihau. No new training events are proposed. The
NEO training event locations at PMRF and Niihau, when added to the
Proposed Action assessed in the RIMPAC PEA and 2004 Supplement, form
the Proposed Action for the purpose of the draft 2006 Supplemental PEA.
Accordingly, the analysis conducted in the draft Supplemental PEA
focused on the following resources: terrestrial and marine environments
and cultural resources. Specifically, the 2006 Supplemental PEA
includes analysis related to mid-frequency active sonar based on
application of emergent science. Long-term studies of the
quantification and effects of exposure of marine mammal species to
acoustic emissions are progressing, and Navy, in coordination with the
NMFS, is incorporating the results into this Supplemental PEA. The
Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) training events being analyzed are not new
and have taken place with no significant changes over the previous 19
RIMPAC exercises. However, new scientific information has led to the
ability to quantitatively identify harassment levels, as defined in the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), through the use of newly derived
threshold criteria metrics. Additionally, scientific advances in
effects-analysis modeling of sound on marine mammals have provided Navy
the ability to predict cumulative effects on marine species due to a
proposed action. Due to these advances in scientific information, the
2006 Supplemental PEA provides an effects-analysis on marine mammals
that may be affected by the RIMPAC training events that use mid-
frequency active sonar.
Based on the assumptions and analyses in the draft SPEA, the
proposed action appears to have no significant impacts on the
environment. However, Navy will consider and incorporate public
comments into the final SPEA before making a decision on the
environmental significance of the proposed action. If warranted, a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be prepared and the final
Supplemental PEA and FONSI will be made available for public review on
or about May 5, 2006.
Dated: January 10, 2006.
Eric McDonald,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E6-647 Filed 1-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P