National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 3227-3228 [E6-572]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866.
9. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
EPA approves State programs as long
as they meet criteria required by RCRA,
so it would be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, in its review of
a State program, to require the use of
any particular voluntary consensus
standard in place of another standard
that meets requirements of RCRA. Thus,
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply to this rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: December 23, 2005.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 06–530 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6550–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
10. Executive Order 12988
40 CFR Part 300
As required by section 3 of Executive
Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7,
1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct.
[FRL–8022–9]
11. Executive Order 12630: Evaluation
of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings
EPA has complied with Executive
Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15,
1988) by examining the takings
implications of the rule in accordance
with the Attorney General’s
Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings issued under the
Executive Order.
12. Congressional Review Act
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
EPA will submit a report containing
this rule and other information required
by the Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.) to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Technical correction of direct
final partial deletion.
AGENCY:
On September 21, 2005, EPA
published a notice of intent to delete (70
FR 55329) and a direct final notice of
deletion (70 FR 55296) for a portion of
the Tar Lake Superfund Site from the
National Priorities List. The EPA is
publishing this Technical Correction to
the direct final notice of deletion due to
errors that were published in Appendix
B in direct final Notice of Deletion.
After review of the direct final Notice of
Deletion, EPA is publishing today this
Technical Correction to change the
word ‘‘ removing’’ to the word
‘‘revising’’ and the location of the site
from the township ‘‘Mancelona,
Michigan,’’ to the ‘‘Mancelona
Township, Michigan.’’ EPA will place a
copy of the final deletion package in the
site repositories.
DATES: This Technical Correction of the
direct final action is effective as of
January 20, 2006.
SUMMARY:
Frm 00023
Comprehensive information
on the Site, as well as the comments
that were received during the comment
period are available at: Stuart Hill,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. EPA , P19J, 77 W. Jackson, Chicago,
IL, (312) 886–0684 or 1–800–621–8431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gladys Beard, State NPL Deletion
Process Manager, U.S. EPA (SR–6J), 77
W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604, (312)
886–7253 or 1–800–621-8431.
Information Repositories: Repositories
have been established to provide
detailed information concerning this
decision at the following address: U.S.
EPA Region V Library, 77 W. Jackson,
Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353–5821,
Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.;
Mancelona Public Library, 202 W. State
Street, Mancelona, MI 49945, (231) 587–
9451, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to
4 p.m., Tuesday and Thursday 6 p.m. to
8 p.m.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
PO 00000
3227
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 29, 2005.
Gary V. Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
V.
Technical Correction
In direct final rule FR Doc. 05–18834,
beginning on page 55300, 3rd column,
in the issue of September 21, 2005,
make the following correction. The
correction should read as follows:
I
Appendix B to Part 300—[Corrected]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended under Michigan ‘‘MI’’ by
revising the entry for ‘‘Tar Lake’’ to read
as follows:
I
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
3228
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1.—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State
Site name
*
*
*
MI ..................................................................................
*
*
City/county
*
*
*
Tar Lake ......................................... Antrim .............................................
*
*
*
*
Notes a
*
P
*
(a) * * *
P=Sites with partial deletion(s).
*
*
*
*
*
Time Observance in Indiana
[FR Doc. E6–572 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
General History
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 71
[OST DOCKET NO. 2005–22114]
RIN 2105–AD53
Standard Time Zone Boundary in the
State of Indiana
Office of the Secretary (OST),
the Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DOT is relocating the time
zone boundary in Indiana to move
Starke, Pulaski, Knox, Daviess, Martin,
Pike, Dubois, and Perry Counties from
the Eastern Time Zone to the Central
Time Zone. DOT is not changing the
time zone boundary to move St. Joseph,
Marshall, Fulton, Benton, White,
Carroll, Cass, Vermillion, Sullivan, and
Lawrence Counties from the Eastern
Time Zone to the Central Time Zone.
This action is taken in response to
petitions filed by the County
Commissioners and extensive comment
provided at public hearings and to the
docket.
DATES: The effective date of this rule is
2 a.m. EST Sunday, April 2, 2006,
which is the changeover date from
standard time to Daylight Saving Time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith S. Kaleta, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room 10428, 400
Seventh Street, Washington, DC 20590,
indianatime@dot.gov; (202) 366–9283.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
The time zone for Indiana has been
the subject of much debate since time
zones were established, as noted by
DOT in a notice proposing to change the
time zone in Indiana, 56 FR 13609
(April 3, 1991). In 1918, when the
Federal government first established
time zones, all of Indiana was in the
Central Time Zone. In 1961, the
Interstate Commerce Commission,
DOT’s predecessor in setting time zones,
moved the eastern half of Indiana to the
Eastern Time Zone, but denied requests
to move more of the State.
In 1967, at the request of the Governor
of Indiana, in a notice of proposed
rulemaking, DOT proposed to restore
the entire State to the Central Time
Zone. However, in 1968, DOT modified
its proposal and proposed instead that
the entire State be in the Eastern Time
Zone with the exception of six counties
in the northwest and seven in the
southwest which would remain in the
Central Time Zone. That modified
proposal was supported by the
commenters, with one exception.
Commenters did not support moving
one of the southwest counties to the
Central Time Zone. Subsequently,
effective April 27, 1969, time zone
boundaries were established to place all
of Indiana in the Eastern Time Zone
with the exception of six counties in the
northwest and six counties in the
southwest.
With regard to the counties in
southwest Indiana, in 1977, the Pike
County Commissioners petitioned DOT
to be moved to the Eastern Time Zone.
After proposing the change and
receiving comments, DOT moved Pike
County to the Eastern Time Zone. The
Indiana General Assembly requested
that DOT move the 5 remaining
southwest counties from the Central
Time Zone to the Eastern Time Zone, in
1985, but DOT denied the request,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
finding that the move would not serve
the ‘‘convenience of commerce.’’
With regard to the counties in
northwest Indiana, in 1986, the Jasper
County Commissioners and the Starke
County Commissioners made separate
requests to move each county from the
Central Time Zone to the Eastern Time
Zone. DOT denied their requests,
finding that changing the boundaries
would not serve the ‘‘convenience of
commerce.’’ In 1991, in a subsequent
proceeding, based on another request
from the Starke County Commissioners,
DOT changed the time zone boundary to
move Starke County into the Eastern
Time Zone.
Current Indiana Time Observance
Under Federal law, 82 Indiana
counties are in the Eastern Time Zone
and 10 are in the Central Time Zone.
The Central Time Zone counties include
five in the northwest (Lake, Porter, La
Porte, Newton, and Jasper) and five in
the southwest (Posey, Vanderburgh,
Warrick, Spencer and Gibson).
Neighboring States observe both eastern
and central time. Illinois and western
Kentucky observe central time, while
eastern Kentucky, Ohio, and the portion
of Michigan adjoining Indiana observe
eastern time.
Federal law provides that it is up to
an individual State to decide whether or
not to observe Daylight Saving Time.
Generally, a State must choose to
observe, or not observe, Daylight Saving
Time across the entire State. The one
exception is that, if a State is in more
than one time zone, a ‘‘split’’ observance
is permitted. Under this scenario, all of
a State that is in one time zone may
observe Daylight Saving Time, while the
remainder of the State in the different
time zone does not. Under Indiana law,
for many years, the Central Time Zone
portion of the State has observed
Daylight Saving Time, while the Eastern
Time Zone portion of the State has not
observed Daylight Saving Time.
E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM
20JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3227-3228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-572]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[FRL-8022-9]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Technical correction of direct final partial deletion.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 21, 2005, EPA published a notice of intent to
delete (70 FR 55329) and a direct final notice of deletion (70 FR
55296) for a portion of the Tar Lake Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List. The EPA is publishing this Technical Correction to the
direct final notice of deletion due to errors that were published in
Appendix B in direct final Notice of Deletion. After review of the
direct final Notice of Deletion, EPA is publishing today this Technical
Correction to change the word `` removing'' to the word ``revising''
and the location of the site from the township ``Mancelona, Michigan,''
to the ``Mancelona Township, Michigan.'' EPA will place a copy of the
final deletion package in the site repositories.
DATES: This Technical Correction of the direct final action is
effective as of January 20, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information on the Site, as well as the
comments that were received during the comment period are available at:
Stuart Hill, Community Involvement Coordinator, U.S. EPA , P19J, 77 W.
Jackson, Chicago, IL, (312) 886-0684 or 1-800-621-8431.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gladys Beard, State NPL Deletion
Process Manager, U.S. EPA (SR-6J), 77 W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 886-7253 or 1-800-621-8431.
Information Repositories: Repositories have been established to
provide detailed information concerning this decision at the following
address: U.S. EPA Region V Library, 77 W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 353-5821, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; Mancelona
Public Library, 202 W. State Street, Mancelona, MI 49945, (231) 587-
9451, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Tuesday and Thursday 6
p.m. to 8 p.m.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 29, 2005.
Gary V. Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region V.
Technical Correction
0
In direct final rule FR Doc. 05-18834, beginning on page 55300, 3rd
column, in the issue of September 21, 2005, make the following
correction. The correction should read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--[Corrected]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended under Michigan ``MI''
by revising the entry for ``Tar Lake'' to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
[[Page 3228]]
Table 1.--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/county Notes a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
MI................................. Tar Lake................. Antrim................... P
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) * * *
P=Sites with partial deletion(s).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-572 Filed 1-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
