Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge in Wakulla, Jefferson and Taylor Counties, FL, 3317-3319 [06-523]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
copy of the Final CCP/EIS is available
at the following Web site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Refuge Manager, Roanoke River national
Wildlife Refuge, 114 West Water Street,
Windsor, North Carolina 27983;
Telephone (252) 794–3808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the ROD,
which selects Final CCP/EIS Alternative
3, for Roanoke river National Wildlife
Refuge. The CCP/EIS provides
management guidance that conserves
refuge resources and facilitates
compatible wildlife-dependent public
use activities during the next 15 years.
The Service has selected as the
preferred alternative, Alternative 3,
which addresses key issues and
conflicts identified during the planning
process, and will best achieve the
purposes and goals of the refuge, as well
as the mission of the National Wildlife
Refuge System. This decision includes
the management goals, objectives, and
strategies identified in the CCP/EIS
Chapter III, the adoption of stipulations
and mitigation measures identified in
Chapter IV, and compatibility
determinations in Appendix IX. The
implementation of the CCP will occur
over the next 15 years, depending on
future staffing levels, funding, and
willing sellers of land.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Factors Considered in Making the
Decision
The decision was based on a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social,
and economic considerations presented
in the Final CCP/EIS. During the
decision-making phase of the CCP
process, the Service reviewed and
considered: The impacts identified in
Chapter IV of the Draft and Final CCP/
EIS; the results of various studies and
surveys conducted in conjunction with
the Draft and Final CCP/EIS; relevant
issues, concerns, and opportunities;
comments on the Draft and Final CCP/
EIS; and other relevant factors,
including the purposes for which the
refuge was established and statutory and
regulatory guidance.
Alternative 3 incorporates several
components addressing a variety of
needs, including fish and wildlife
surveys, habitat restoration and
protection, acquisition of lands within
the approved acquisition boundary, and
the six priority public uses of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997.
It is, however, the unique
combination of these components that
contributes the most to achieving the
refuge’s purposes and goals. Alternative
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
3 strengthens the monitoring of fish,
wildlife, habitat, and public uses that
will provide the means to better respond
to rapidly changing conditions on the
refuge. Alternative 3 was selected for
implementation because it provides the
greatest number of opportunities for the
refuge to contribute to the fish, wildlife,
and habitat needs of the Roanoke River
watershed.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1977, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: November 30, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06–521 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment for St.
Marks National Wildlife Refuge in
Wakulla, Jefferson and Taylor
Counties, FL
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service
announces that a Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge are available for review
and comment. The National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, requires the Service to
develop a comprehensive conservation
plan for each national wildlife refuge.
The purpose in developing a
comprehensive conservation plan is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
DATES: Public meetings will be held in
each county to present the plan to the
public. Mailings, media releases, and
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3317
Web site postings will be the avenues to
inform the public of the dates and times
for the meetings. Individuals wishing to
comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge should do so no later
than March 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment should
be addressed to Mary Morris, Natural
Resource Planner, St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 68, St. Marks,
Florida 32355; Telephone (850) 925–
6121. The plan and environmental
assessment may also be accessed and
downloaded from the Service’s Internet
Web site
https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/ or
the refuge’s Web site https://
saintmarks.fws.gov. Comments on the
draft plan may be submitted to the
above address (attention: Mary Morris,
Natural Resource Planner) or via
electronic mail to Mary_Morris@fws.gov.
Please include your name and return
address in your Internet message. Our
practice is to make comments, including
names and home addressed of
respondents, available for pubic review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Priority
issues addressed in the draft plan
include: habitat protection and land
conservation; migratory birds;
partnerships; fire and forest
management; exotic, invasive and
nuisance species; wildlife inventory and
monitoring; imperiled species
management; visitor services; funding
and staffing; and wilderness and
cultural resources protection.
The Service developed three
alternatives for managing the refuge and
chose Alternative 2 as the preferred
alternative.
Alternatives
Alternative 1 represents no change
from current management of the refuge.
The most recent approved acquisition
boundary expansion (2000) would allow
for the acquisition and protection of
3,764 acres of land adjacent to the
refuge. Habitat planning documents
would be revised as staff resources
allow. Currently, the State of Florida
provides funding for the majority of
exotic plant species control and
supplies, but staff resources are used for
an aggressive control program. Exotic
animals are removed through the hunt
program. A series of impoundments are
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
3318
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
managed for waterfowl and these
habitats are dependent on the upper
basin outside of the refuge, which is
experiencing hydrologic change.
Most research work on the refuge is
conducted with outside funding and
partnering agencies. Monitoring work is
focused to the highest priority species,
such as red-cockaded woodpeckers. The
refuge has a need for basic inventories
of threatened, endangered, and
imperiled species and plant and animal
species. The habitat and life
requirement needs of many species are
unknown and the presence or absence
of rare or imperiled species has not been
fully addressed.
Visitor services would remain with
existing programs, facilities, and staff
addressing the priority public uses—
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation. Environmental education
and interpretation programs would
continue and be conducted mainly
onsite, with staff participation in a few
offsite outreach festivals yearly.
Protection of cultural resources would
continue to rely on patrols by the law
enforcement officer. A comprehensive
inventory of resources is needed. The
St. Marks Lighthouse would remain an
unimproved structure without public
access. Maintenance would be
performed, as required for a national
historic site to the extent funding is
available.
The Wilderness Area would remain a
Class I airshed and monitoring of ozone
would continue. Patrols in the
Wilderness Areas would also continue
to be performed by the law enforcement
officer.
All refuge functions would be
conducted in existing administrative,
visitor service, fire, and maintenance
facilities. The existing staff would be
maintained.
The preferred alternative, Alternative
2, is considered the most effective
management action for meeting the
purposes of the refuge. The proposed
management plan outlines the
enhancement of wildlife populations
and related habitats over the next 15
years. It also improves refuge safety and
protection of resources, and may
provide visitors with more
opportunities for wildlife viewing and
wildlife-dependent recreation.
Environmental education and outreach
would be expanded under this proposed
option.
In support of habitat and wildlife
conservation, the most notable proposal
is to emphasize and encourage the
protection of additional conservation
lands, outside the current acquisition
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
boundary, that are critical to the
protection of refuge resources. This
conservation focus area includes lands
south of U.S. Highway 98, southeast of
Panacea, south of the Ochlockonee
river, and the East and Wacissa Rivers
drainage basins. The State of Florida is
actively pursuing the acquisition of
lands adjacent to the refuge and seeking
partnerships with the Service for
management. A conservation buffer area
around the refuge would help ensure
the integrity of the refuge’s land and
water resources and enhance the
connectivity of wildlands critical for
species, such as the Florida black bear,
by providing a conservation corridor.
Many objectives and strategies focus on
maintaining and restoring native
communities, particularly longleaf pine.
The development of the refuge as a Land
Management Research and
Demonstration Area would help the
refuge to become a leader in longleaf
pine research and conservation and
would enable the sharing of that
knowledge with other to benefit both
private and publicly owned lands.
Programs to control or eradicate
terrestrial and aquatic non-indigenous
and invasive plants are proposed, as is
nuisance animal control. Hydrologic
studies and land conservation are
proposed to maintain the integrity of
refuge resources and to manage the
impoundments to benefit migratory
birds.
Many ongoing and proposed programs
and effort focus on threatened,
endangered, rare, and imperiled species
of plants and animals. The need for
extensive inventorying and monitoring
for baseline data is addressed in this
management plan, particularly for redcockaded woodpeckers, bald eagles,
wood storks, least terns and flatwood
salamanders.
Since a primary purpose for refuge
establishment is to provide habitat for
migratory birds, the improvement of the
impoundments to provide high quality
for waterfowl, shorebirds and marsh
birds is proposed. So, too, are strategies
to improve forested habitat, such as pine
flatwoods, pine-cabbage palmetto
hammocks, mesic and hydric pine
hardwood, and hardwood hammocks.
A primary focus of the visitor services
program, as proposed, is to enhance
environmental education and outreach
efforts substantially. This plan may offer
increased opportunity for wildlifedependent recreation, such as
photography, hiking and wildlife
observation. Fishing improvements and
angler awareness programs are
proposed. The feasibility of conducting
youth hunt programs and clinics will be
explored. The restoration of the St.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marks Lighthouse would provide an
opportunity to present the refuge’s rich
cultural and historic heritage.
Sensitive areas and rich resources,
such as the refuge’s designated
Wilderness Area and cultural resources,
would receive more protection through
increased law enforcement. A major
provision of this alternative is a
comprehensive study of all refuge
archaeological and historical resources.
Meeting basic refuge operation needs
has been addressed. Essential new office
space, staffing, and equipment needs are
proposed.
Alternative 3 incorporates and buildsupon all the habitat improvements
listed under Alternative 2. Protection of
the East River drainage basin would
occur. Exotic plant and animal species
would be controlled or eradicated.
Hardwood habitat management would
be improved.
The biological programs of the refuge
would be greatly enhanced with the
addition of three biologist and/or
biological technician positions to
expand the Land Management Research
and Demonstration Area program, to
add additional projects, and to improve
outreach and coordination with other
conservation agencies and the public.
Monitoring and inventorying of rare and
imperiled species would be enhanced,
especially for reptiles, amphibians,
mammals, and those bird species not
considered highest priority. A
herpetologist would be employed to
study reptiles and amphibians, to
conduct literature reviews, and to share
data with partners. Wood-duck banding
would be increased. The impoundments
would be actively managed for rails, and
life-history studies would be conducted.
Point counts of priority species would
be undertaken for regional and national
trend analysis. With additional staff,
refuge personnel could more effectively
monitor and respond to wildlife
disturbance and habitat management
issues.
Visitor services would be improved
with the addition of a ranger position to
operate the expanded Visitor Center and
to assist with both on- and off-site
outreach opportunities. Two additional
environmental education specialists
would maintain the environmental
education classroom, laboratory outdoor
classrooms and overnight facility,
providing maximum opportunity to the
public and groups 7 days a week. They
would assist the lead environmental
education specialist in program
development and training of staff,
volunteers, and educators. In addition to
needed facilities proposed under
Alternative 2, a research center to house
the Land Management Research and
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
Demonstration Area program staff
would be constructed in order to
provide laboratory and housing facilities
for partnering researchers and
educators.
Cultural and wilderness resources
would be further protected through the
addition of a law enforcement officer
who would also serve as a community
police liaison in an effort to educate the
public about refuge resources and to
deter and prevent crime. All step-down
plans, except for the Land Protection
Plan, would be completed within 5
years of plan adoption.
The refuge, established in 1931 as a
breeding ground for wild animals and
birds, is situated along the Gulf coast of
northwest Florida, about 25 miles south
of Tallahassee. It currently covers about
68,931 acres with an approved
acquisition boundary of 74,469 acres.
Refuge personnel also manage 947 acres
of State land and 334 acres of USDA
Forest Service land within the approved
acquisition boundary. The Wilderness
Act designated 17,446 acres as the St.
Marks Wilderness. The refuge aims to
provide habitat for a natural diversity of
plants and animals with a primary
purpose of wildlife habitat conservation.
The refuge is also being managed to
provide opportunity for compatible
wildlife-dependent recreation.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Pub. L.
105–57.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06–523 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Request for Information and
Recommendations on Species
Proposals, Resolutions, Decisions,
and Agenda Items for Consideration at
the Fourteenth Regular Meeting of the
Conference of the Parties to the
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora; U.S. Approach for the
Meeting of the Conference of the
Parties
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for information.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In order to implement the
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora (CITES or the Convention), the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Parties to the Convention meet
periodically to review which species in
international trade should be regulated
and other aspects of the implementation
of CITES. The fourteenth regular
meeting of the Conference of the Parties
to CITES (CoP14) is tentatively
scheduled to be held June 3–15, 2007,
in The Hague, Netherlands. Therefore,
with this notice we are soliciting
recommendations for amending
Appendices I and II of CITES at CoP14.
We are also soliciting recommendations
for resolutions, decisions, and agenda
items for discussion at CoP14. We invite
you to provide us with information and
recommendations on animal and plant
species that should be considered as
candidates for U.S. proposals to amend
CITES Appendices I and II. Such
amendments may concern the addition
of species to Appendix I or II, the
transfer of species from one Appendix
to another, or the removal of species
from Appendix II. We also invite you to
provide us with information and
recommendations on possible
resolutions, decisions, and agenda items
for discussion at the upcoming meeting.
Finally, with this notice we also
describe the U.S. approach to
preparations for CoP14.
DATES: We will consider all information
and comments received by March 20,
2006.
Send correspondence
pertaining to species proposals to the
Division of Scientific Authority; U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 North
Fairfax Drive; Room 750; Arlington,
Virginia 22203, or via E-mail to:
scientificauthority@fws.gov. Comments
and materials received pertaining to
species proposals will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, from
8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, at the Division of Scientific
Authority.
Send correspondence pertaining to
resolutions, decisions, and agenda items
to the Division of Management
Authority; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 North Fairfax Drive; Room
700; Arlington, Virginia 22203, or via Email at: CoP14@fws.gov. Comments and
materials received pertaining to
resolutions, decisions, and agenda items
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, at the Division
of Management Authority.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information pertaining to species
proposals: Robert R. Gabel, Chief,
Division of Scientific Authority, phone
703–358–1708, fax 703–358–2276, Email: scientificauthority@fws.gov.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3319
For information pertaining to
resolutions, decisions, and agenda
items: Peter O. Thomas, Chief, Division
of Management Authority, phone 703–
358–2095, fax 703–358–2298, E-mail:
CoP14@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
The Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora, hereinafter referred to
as CITES or the Convention, is an
international treaty designed to control
and regulate international trade in
certain animal and plant species that are
now or potentially may be threatened
with extinction. These species are listed
in the Appendices to CITES, which are
available on the CITES Secretariat’s Web
site at https://www.cites.org/eng/app/
index.shtml. Currently, 169 countries,
including the United States, are Parties
to CITES. The Convention calls for
biennial meetings of the Conference of
the Parties, which review its
implementation, make provisions
enabling the CITES Secretariat in
Switzerland to carry out its functions,
consider amendments to the list of
species in Appendices I and II, consider
reports presented by the Secretariat, and
make recommendations for the
improved effectiveness of CITES. Any
country that is a Party to CITES may
propose amendments to Appendices I
and II, resolutions, decisions, and/or
agenda items for consideration by all the
Parties.
This is our first in a series of Federal
Register notices that, together with
announced public meetings, provide
you with an opportunity to participate
in the development of the U.S.
negotiating positions for the fourteenth
regular meeting of the Conference of the
Parties to CITES (CoP14). Our
regulations governing this public
process are found in 50 CFR 23.31–
23.39.
Announcement of the Fourteenth
Meeting of the Conference of the Parties
We hereby notify you of the
convening of CoP14, which is
tentatively scheduled to be held June 3–
15, 2007, in The Hague, Netherlands.
U.S. Approach for CoP14
What Are the Priorities for U.S.
Submissions to CoP14?
Priorities for U.S. submissions to
CoP14 continue to be consistent with
the overall objective of U.S.
participation in the Convention: to
maximize the effectiveness of the
Convention in the conservation and
sustainable use of species subject to
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3317-3319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-523]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for St. Marks National Wildlife
Refuge in Wakulla, Jefferson and Taylor Counties, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service announces that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for St.
Marks National Wildlife Refuge are available for review and comment.
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997,
requires the Service to develop a comprehensive conservation plan for
each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a
comprehensive conservation plan is to provide refuge managers with a
15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward
the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with
sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad
management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, plans
identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the
public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation.
DATES: Public meetings will be held in each county to present the plan
to the public. Mailings, media releases, and Web site postings will be
the avenues to inform the public of the dates and times for the
meetings. Individuals wishing to comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge should do so no later than March 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment should be addressed to Mary Morris,
Natural Resource Planner, St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box
68, St. Marks, Florida 32355; Telephone (850) 925-6121. The plan and
environmental assessment may also be accessed and downloaded from the
Service's Internet Web site https://southeast.fws.gov/planning/ or the
refuge's Web site https://saintmarks.fws.gov. Comments on the draft plan
may be submitted to the above address (attention: Mary Morris, Natural
Resource Planner) or via electronic mail to Mary--Morris@fws.gov.
Please include your name and return address in your Internet message.
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addressed of
respondents, available for pubic review during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home
addresses from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable
by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Priority issues addressed in the draft plan
include: habitat protection and land conservation; migratory birds;
partnerships; fire and forest management; exotic, invasive and nuisance
species; wildlife inventory and monitoring; imperiled species
management; visitor services; funding and staffing; and wilderness and
cultural resources protection.
The Service developed three alternatives for managing the refuge
and chose Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative.
Alternatives
Alternative 1 represents no change from current management of the
refuge. The most recent approved acquisition boundary expansion (2000)
would allow for the acquisition and protection of 3,764 acres of land
adjacent to the refuge. Habitat planning documents would be revised as
staff resources allow. Currently, the State of Florida provides funding
for the majority of exotic plant species control and supplies, but
staff resources are used for an aggressive control program. Exotic
animals are removed through the hunt program. A series of impoundments
are
[[Page 3318]]
managed for waterfowl and these habitats are dependent on the upper
basin outside of the refuge, which is experiencing hydrologic change.
Most research work on the refuge is conducted with outside funding
and partnering agencies. Monitoring work is focused to the highest
priority species, such as red-cockaded woodpeckers. The refuge has a
need for basic inventories of threatened, endangered, and imperiled
species and plant and animal species. The habitat and life requirement
needs of many species are unknown and the presence or absence of rare
or imperiled species has not been fully addressed.
Visitor services would remain with existing programs, facilities,
and staff addressing the priority public uses--hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education
and interpretation. Environmental education and interpretation programs
would continue and be conducted mainly onsite, with staff participation
in a few offsite outreach festivals yearly.
Protection of cultural resources would continue to rely on patrols
by the law enforcement officer. A comprehensive inventory of resources
is needed. The St. Marks Lighthouse would remain an unimproved
structure without public access. Maintenance would be performed, as
required for a national historic site to the extent funding is
available.
The Wilderness Area would remain a Class I airshed and monitoring
of ozone would continue. Patrols in the Wilderness Areas would also
continue to be performed by the law enforcement officer.
All refuge functions would be conducted in existing administrative,
visitor service, fire, and maintenance facilities. The existing staff
would be maintained.
The preferred alternative, Alternative 2, is considered the most
effective management action for meeting the purposes of the refuge. The
proposed management plan outlines the enhancement of wildlife
populations and related habitats over the next 15 years. It also
improves refuge safety and protection of resources, and may provide
visitors with more opportunities for wildlife viewing and wildlife-
dependent recreation. Environmental education and outreach would be
expanded under this proposed option.
In support of habitat and wildlife conservation, the most notable
proposal is to emphasize and encourage the protection of additional
conservation lands, outside the current acquisition boundary, that are
critical to the protection of refuge resources. This conservation focus
area includes lands south of U.S. Highway 98, southeast of Panacea,
south of the Ochlockonee river, and the East and Wacissa Rivers
drainage basins. The State of Florida is actively pursuing the
acquisition of lands adjacent to the refuge and seeking partnerships
with the Service for management. A conservation buffer area around the
refuge would help ensure the integrity of the refuge's land and water
resources and enhance the connectivity of wildlands critical for
species, such as the Florida black bear, by providing a conservation
corridor. Many objectives and strategies focus on maintaining and
restoring native communities, particularly longleaf pine. The
development of the refuge as a Land Management Research and
Demonstration Area would help the refuge to become a leader in longleaf
pine research and conservation and would enable the sharing of that
knowledge with other to benefit both private and publicly owned lands.
Programs to control or eradicate terrestrial and aquatic non-indigenous
and invasive plants are proposed, as is nuisance animal control.
Hydrologic studies and land conservation are proposed to maintain the
integrity of refuge resources and to manage the impoundments to benefit
migratory birds.
Many ongoing and proposed programs and effort focus on threatened,
endangered, rare, and imperiled species of plants and animals. The need
for extensive inventorying and monitoring for baseline data is
addressed in this management plan, particularly for red-cockaded
woodpeckers, bald eagles, wood storks, least terns and flatwood
salamanders.
Since a primary purpose for refuge establishment is to provide
habitat for migratory birds, the improvement of the impoundments to
provide high quality for waterfowl, shorebirds and marsh birds is
proposed. So, too, are strategies to improve forested habitat, such as
pine flatwoods, pine-cabbage palmetto hammocks, mesic and hydric pine
hardwood, and hardwood hammocks.
A primary focus of the visitor services program, as proposed, is to
enhance environmental education and outreach efforts substantially.
This plan may offer increased opportunity for wildlife-dependent
recreation, such as photography, hiking and wildlife observation.
Fishing improvements and angler awareness programs are proposed. The
feasibility of conducting youth hunt programs and clinics will be
explored. The restoration of the St. Marks Lighthouse would provide an
opportunity to present the refuge's rich cultural and historic
heritage.
Sensitive areas and rich resources, such as the refuge's designated
Wilderness Area and cultural resources, would receive more protection
through increased law enforcement. A major provision of this
alternative is a comprehensive study of all refuge archaeological and
historical resources.
Meeting basic refuge operation needs has been addressed. Essential
new office space, staffing, and equipment needs are proposed.
Alternative 3 incorporates and builds-upon all the habitat
improvements listed under Alternative 2. Protection of the East River
drainage basin would occur. Exotic plant and animal species would be
controlled or eradicated. Hardwood habitat management would be
improved.
The biological programs of the refuge would be greatly enhanced
with the addition of three biologist and/or biological technician
positions to expand the Land Management Research and Demonstration Area
program, to add additional projects, and to improve outreach and
coordination with other conservation agencies and the public.
Monitoring and inventorying of rare and imperiled species would be
enhanced, especially for reptiles, amphibians, mammals, and those bird
species not considered highest priority. A herpetologist would be
employed to study reptiles and amphibians, to conduct literature
reviews, and to share data with partners. Wood-duck banding would be
increased. The impoundments would be actively managed for rails, and
life-history studies would be conducted. Point counts of priority
species would be undertaken for regional and national trend analysis.
With additional staff, refuge personnel could more effectively monitor
and respond to wildlife disturbance and habitat management issues.
Visitor services would be improved with the addition of a ranger
position to operate the expanded Visitor Center and to assist with both
on- and off-site outreach opportunities. Two additional environmental
education specialists would maintain the environmental education
classroom, laboratory outdoor classrooms and overnight facility,
providing maximum opportunity to the public and groups 7 days a week.
They would assist the lead environmental education specialist in
program development and training of staff, volunteers, and educators.
In addition to needed facilities proposed under Alternative 2, a
research center to house the Land Management Research and
[[Page 3319]]
Demonstration Area program staff would be constructed in order to
provide laboratory and housing facilities for partnering researchers
and educators.
Cultural and wilderness resources would be further protected
through the addition of a law enforcement officer who would also serve
as a community police liaison in an effort to educate the public about
refuge resources and to deter and prevent crime. All step-down plans,
except for the Land Protection Plan, would be completed within 5 years
of plan adoption.
The refuge, established in 1931 as a breeding ground for wild
animals and birds, is situated along the Gulf coast of northwest
Florida, about 25 miles south of Tallahassee. It currently covers about
68,931 acres with an approved acquisition boundary of 74,469 acres.
Refuge personnel also manage 947 acres of State land and 334 acres of
USDA Forest Service land within the approved acquisition boundary. The
Wilderness Act designated 17,446 acres as the St. Marks Wilderness. The
refuge aims to provide habitat for a natural diversity of plants and
animals with a primary purpose of wildlife habitat conservation. The
refuge is also being managed to provide opportunity for compatible
wildlife-dependent recreation.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Pub. L.
105-57.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06-523 Filed 1-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M