Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 3327 [06-509]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Notices
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: January 17, 2006.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–641 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on
December 30, 2005, a proposed Consent
Decree in the lead case Lyondell
Chemical Co., et al. v. Albemarle Corp.
et al., Civil Action No. 01CV890,
consolidated with United States v. EPEC
Polymers, Inc., 02CV003, and El Paso
Tennessee Pipeline Co., et al. v. Chevron
USA, Inc., et al., 03CV0225, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Texas.
This settlement relates to the PetroChemical Systems, Inc. Superfunded
Site located in Liberty County, Texas
(‘‘the Site’’). On December 6, 2001,
ARCO and Lyondell Chemical Company
(successor to ACC) (hereinafter ‘‘ARCO/
Lyondell’’) sued a number of parties,
including the Settling Defendants
(Celanese, Ltd. and CNA Holdings f/k/
a Hoechst Celanese Corporation; Cook
Composites and Polymers Co.; E.R.
Carpenter, L.P., Successor in Interest to
Carpenter Chemical Company; Hercules
Incorporated; Texaco, Inc., as
predecessor to Huntsman Petrochemical
Corporation; NL Industries, f/k/a
National Lead Company; Rexene
Corporation, n/k/a Huntsman Polymers
Corporation; and Vacuum Tanks, Inc.)
to this Consent Decree, for cost recovery
and contribution under CERCLA
Sections 107 and 113, 42 U.S.C. 9607
and 9613, on the grounds that these
parties were liable under CERCLA for
the remediation of the Site. On January
3, 2002, the United States filed a
complaint against EPEC Polymers, Inc.
pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42
U.S.C. 9607, seeking, inter alia: (1)
Reimbursement of response costs and
(2) a declaratory judgment of liability for
any future response costs incurred by
the United States at the Site. EPEC
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:16 Jan 19, 2006
Jkt 208001
Polymers, Inc., as well as other El Paso
Corporation entities (together
hereinafter ‘‘El Paso’’) were also named
in the ARCO/Lyondell matter and
ultimately brought contribution claims
against various parties including the
Settling Defendants to this Consent
Decree.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
the United States provides covenants
not to sue settling defendants under
CERCLA Sections 106 and 107, 42
U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, in connection
with the site. The proposed Consent
Decree resolves the contribution claims
brought by ARCO/Lyondell and El Paso
against Settling Defendants and Settling
Defendants shall pay the United States
$37,000 for response costs incurred by
the Environment Protection Agency at
the Site and $369,000 to the
contribution plaintiffs.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of third (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. EPEC Polymers, Inc., D.J. Ref.
90–11–3–709/1.
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney, Eastern District of Texas, 350
Magnolia Avenue, Suite 350, Beaumont,
Texas 77657, and at U.S. EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202.
During the public comment period, the
Consent Decree, may also be examined
on the following Department of Justice
Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
open.html. A copy of the Consent
Decree may also be obtained by mail
from the Consent Decree Library, P.O.
Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy by mail, from the
Consent Decree Library, please enclose
a check in the amount of $8.75 (25 cents
per page reproduction cost) payable to
the U.S. Treasury.
Thomas A. Mariana, Jr.,
Assistant Chief, Environmental, Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–509 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–M
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3327
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
United States, State of Illinois, State of
New York, and Commonwealth of
Massachusetts v. Marquee Holdings,
Inc. and LCE Holdings, Inc.; Complaint,
Proposed Final Judgment, and
Competitive Impact Statement
Notice is hereby given pursuant to the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. section 16(b) through (h), that
a Complaint, proposed Final Judgment,
Stipulation and Competitive Impact
Statement have been filed with the
United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in United
States of America, State of Illinois, State
of New York, and Commonwealth of
Massachusetts v. Marquee Holdings,
Inc. and LCE Holdings, Inc., Civil
Action No. 05–10722. On December 22,
2005, the United States filed a
Complaint alleging that the proposed
merger of Marquee Holdings, Inc. and
LCE Holdings, Inc. would violate
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
18 by lessening competition for
theatrical exhibition of first-run films in
five cities: Boston, MA, New York, NY,
Chicago, IL, Dallas, TX, and Seattle,
WA. The proposed Final Judgment, filed
at the same time as the Complaint,
requires the defendants to divest firstrun, commercial theatres, along with
certain tangible and intangible assets, in
those five cities in order to proceed with
the proposed $4 billion transaction. A
Competitive Impact Statement filed by
the United States on December 22, 2005
describes the Complaint, the proposed
Final Judgment, the industry, and the
remedies available to private litigants
who may have been injured by the
alleged violation.
Copies of the Complaint, proposed
Final Judgment and Competitive Impact
Statement are available for inspection at
the Department of Justice in
Washington, DC in Room 200, 325
Seventh Street, NW., and at the Office
of the Clerk of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New
York, New York, New York. Copies of
these materials may be obtained from
the Antitrust Division upon request and
payment of the copying fee set by
Department of Justice regulations.
Public comment is invited within 60
days of the date of this notice. Such
comments, and responses thereto, will
be published in the Federal Register
and filed with the Court. Comments
should be directed to John R. Read,
Chief, Litigation III Section, Antitrust
Division, United States Department of
Justice, 325 7th Street, NW., Suite 300,
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 3327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-509]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Notice is hereby given that on December 30, 2005, a proposed
Consent Decree in the lead case Lyondell Chemical Co., et al. v.
Albemarle Corp. et al., Civil Action No. 01CV890, consolidated with
United States v. EPEC Polymers, Inc., 02CV003, and El Paso Tennessee
Pipeline Co., et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al., 03CV0225, was lodged
with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas.
This settlement relates to the Petro-Chemical Systems, Inc.
Superfunded Site located in Liberty County, Texas (``the Site''). On
December 6, 2001, ARCO and Lyondell Chemical Company (successor to ACC)
(hereinafter ``ARCO/Lyondell'') sued a number of parties, including the
Settling Defendants (Celanese, Ltd. and CNA Holdings f/k/a Hoechst
Celanese Corporation; Cook Composites and Polymers Co.; E.R. Carpenter,
L.P., Successor in Interest to Carpenter Chemical Company; Hercules
Incorporated; Texaco, Inc., as predecessor to Huntsman Petrochemical
Corporation; NL Industries, f/k/a National Lead Company; Rexene
Corporation, n/k/a Huntsman Polymers Corporation; and Vacuum Tanks,
Inc.) to this Consent Decree, for cost recovery and contribution under
CERCLA Sections 107 and 113, 42 U.S.C. 9607 and 9613, on the grounds
that these parties were liable under CERCLA for the remediation of the
Site. On January 3, 2002, the United States filed a complaint against
EPEC Polymers, Inc. pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42 U.S.C. 9607,
seeking, inter alia: (1) Reimbursement of response costs and (2) a
declaratory judgment of liability for any future response costs
incurred by the United States at the Site. EPEC Polymers, Inc., as well
as other El Paso Corporation entities (together hereinafter ``El
Paso'') were also named in the ARCO/Lyondell matter and ultimately
brought contribution claims against various parties including the
Settling Defendants to this Consent Decree.
Under the proposed Consent Decree, the United States provides
covenants not to sue settling defendants under CERCLA Sections 106 and
107, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, in connection with the site. The proposed
Consent Decree resolves the contribution claims brought by ARCO/
Lyondell and El Paso against Settling Defendants and Settling
Defendants shall pay the United States $37,000 for response costs
incurred by the Environment Protection Agency at the Site and $369,000
to the contribution plaintiffs.
The Department of Justice will receive for a period of third (30)
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent
Decree. comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and should refer to
United States v. EPEC Polymers, Inc., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-709/1.
The Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the United
States Attorney, Eastern District of Texas, 350 Magnolia Avenue, Suite
350, Beaumont, Texas 77657, and at U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas 75202. During the public comment period, the Consent
Decree, may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web
site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy of the Consent Decree
may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box
7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611 or by
faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood
(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514-0097, phone confirmation
number (202) 514-1547. In requesting a copy by mail, from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $8.75 (25 cents
per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury.
Thomas A. Mariana, Jr.,
Assistant Chief, Environmental, Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 06-509 Filed 1-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M