Extension of Port Limits of Rockford, IL, 2457-2458 [06-359]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Optional Terminating Action
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
sensors can be conclusively determined from
that review. If no Honeywell AOA sensor
having part number (P/N) 965–4020–007 is
found, then no further action is required by
this paragraph. If any Honeywell AOA sensor
having P/N 965–4020–007 is found, before
further flight, replace the AOA sensor with
a new or overhauled AOA sensor having
P/N 965–4020–007, in accordance with the
service bulletin. Repeat the replacement
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 8,000
flight hours or 96 months, whichever is first.
Accomplishing the actions specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the
repetitive replacements.
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
I
2006–01–03 Airbus: Amendment 39–14442.
Docket No. FAA–2005–22035;
Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–016–AD.
(g) Replacement of all Honeywell AOA
sensors having P/N 965–4020–007 between
frame (FR)18 and FR19 with ‘‘vane type’’
AOA sensors; and replacement of the current
detectors in relay boxes 252VU and 107VU
with new current detectors; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–34–0092,
Revision 04, dated April 25, 2005; terminate
the repetitive replacements required by
paragraph (f) of this AD.
No Reporting Requirement
Effective Date
(a) This AD becomes effective February 21,
2006.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
(h) Although Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–34–0176, Revision 01, dated February
3, 2004, specifies to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
Parts Installation
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model
A300 B2–1A, B2–1C, B2K–3C, and B2–203
airplanes; and Model A300 B4–2C, B4–103,
and B4–203 airplanes; certificated in any
category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD was prompted by reports of
several false stall warnings associated with
stick-shaker activation, occurring during
take-off. We are issuing this AD to prevent
false stall warnings associated with stickshaker activation, which could result in
increased pilot workload as the pilot tries to
determine the cause of the stall warning and
possible reduction in the pilot’s ability to
control the airplane.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Repetitive Replacements
(f) Within 4,500 flight hours or 36 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
is first: Inspect zone 120 to determine the
part numbers (P/Ns) of all three angle of
attack (AOA) sensors, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–34–0176, Revision 01,
dated February 3, 2004. Instead of inspecting
zone 120 to determine the P/Ns of the AOA
sensors, a review of airplane maintenance
records is acceptable if the P/Ns of the AOA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:48 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an AOA sensor having
P/N 965–4020–007 on any airplane, unless it
is new or overhauled. Thereafter repetitively
replace the new or overhauled AOA sensor
in accordance with paragraph (f) of this AD.
Credit for Previously Accomplished Actions
(j) Actions done before the effective date of
this AD in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–34–0176, dated July 9, 2003,
are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of paragraph (f)
of this AD.
Credit for Optional Terminating Action
(k) Actions done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–34–092, Revision 2, dated July
18, 1985, or Airbus Service Bulletin A300–
34–0092, Revision 03, dated November 2,
2004, are acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(l)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested in accordance with
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19 on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
the appropriate principal inspector in the
FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding
District Office.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2457
Related Information
(m) French airworthiness directive F–
2003–457 R1, dated December 22, 2004, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(n) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–34–0176, Revision 01, excluding
Appendix 01, dated February 3, 2004, to
perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
optional terminating action provided by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if accomplished,
must be done in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–34–0092, Revision 04,
dated April 25, 2005. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation
by reference of these documents in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France, for a copy of this service information.
You may review copies at the Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
room PL–401, Nassif Building, Washington,
DC; on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at the NARA,
call (202) 741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
5, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–315 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[CBP Dec. 05–38]
Extension of Port Limits of Rockford,
IL
Customs and Border Protection;
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule amends the
Department of Homeland Security
regulations pertaining to the field
organization of the Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection by extending the
geographical limits of the port of entry
at Rockford, Illinois, to include the City
of Rochelle, Illinois. The extension of
the port is necessary to accommodate
the Union Pacific Railroad Company’s
new intermodal facility in Rochelle.
This change is part of the Bureau of
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
2458
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 10 / Tuesday, January 17, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Customs and Border Protection’s
continuing program to utilize more
efficiently its personnel, facilities, and
resources, and to provide better service
to carriers, importers, and the general
public.
DATES:
Effective Date: February 16,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Dore, Office of Field Operations,
202–344–2776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
has a new state-of-the-art intermodal rail
facility that is located 25 miles south of
Rockford in Rochelle, Illinois. This
facility provides the capacity necessary
to support the efficient interchange of
shipments to and from rail connections
and to expedite the operation of trains
and containers. In order to
accommodate this new facility, and
provide better service to carriers,
importers, and the public, the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is
extending the port limits of the port of
Rockford, Illinois, to include the City of
Rochelle, Illinois.
A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
concerning this extension was
published in the Federal Register (69
FR 50107) on August 13, 2004. No
comments were received in response to
the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. As
CBP believes that the extension of the
Port of Rockford, Illinois, to include the
City of Rochelle, will improve service to
importers and the rail transportation
industry in Illinois, CBP is expanding
the limits of the port of Rockford as
proposed.
New Port Limits of Rockford, Illinois
CBP extends the limits of the port of
Rockford, Illinois, to include the City of
Rochelle, Illinois, so that the description
of the limits of port reads as follows:
Bounded to the north by the Illinois/
Wisconsin border; bounded to the west
by Illinois State Route 26; bounded to
the south by Interstate Route 88;
bounded to the east by Illinois State
Route 23 to the Wisconsin/Illinois
border.
entry throughout the United States to
accommodate the volume of CBP-related
activity in various parts of the country.
It also will not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly, it
is certified that this document is not
subject to the additional requirements of
the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
In addition, DHS and the Office of
Management and Budget have
determined that this final rule does not
constitute a significant regulatory action
as defined under Executive Order
12866.
Signing Authority
The signing authority for this
document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a).
Accordingly, the final rule is signed by
the Secretary of Homeland Security.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs ports of entry, Exports,
Imports, Organization and functions
(Government Agencies).
Amendment to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth above, 19
CFR part 101 is amended as set forth
below.
I
PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The general authority citation for
part 101 is revised and the specific
authority provision for § 101.3
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66,
1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a.
Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under
19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
*
*
§ 101.3
*
*
*
[Amended]
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Authority
2. In the list of ports in § 101.3(b)(1),
under the state of Illinois, the ‘‘Limits of
port’’ column adjacent to ‘‘Rockford’’ in
the ‘‘Ports of entry’’ column is amended
by removing the citation ‘‘T.D. 95–62’’
and adding in its place ‘‘CBP Dec. 05–
38’’.
This change is being made under the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and 19 U.S.C.
2, 66 and 1624, and the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107–
296 (November 25, 2002).
Dated: January 3, 2006.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–359 Filed 1–13–06; 8:45 am]
I
BILLING CODE 9110–06–U
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 12866
With DHS approval, CBP establishes,
expands, and consolidates CBP ports of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:48 Jan 13, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 210
[Docket No. 2005N–0285]
Current Good Manufacturing Practice
Regulation and Investigational New
Drugs
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending its
current good manufacturing practice
(CGMP) regulations for human drugs,
including biological products, to exempt
most investigational ‘‘Phase 1’’ drugs
from complying with the requirements
in FDA’s regulations. FDA will instead
exercise oversight of production of these
drugs under the agency’s general
statutory CGMP authority and
investigational new drug application
(IND) authority. In addition, FDA is
making available simultaneously with
the publication of this direct final rule,
a guidance document setting forth
recommendations on approaches to
CGMP compliance for the exempted
Phase 1 drugs.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is publishing a
companion proposed rule, under FDA’s
usual procedure for notice-andcomment rulemaking, to provide a
procedural framework to finalize the
rule in the event the agency receives any
significant adverse comments and
withdraws this direct final rule. The
companion proposed rule and direct
final rule are substantively identical.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ‘‘INDs—Approaches to
Complying With CGMP During Phase 1’’
to provide further guidance on the
subject.
DATES: This rule is effective June 1,
2006. Submit written or electronic
comments on or before April 3, 2006. If
FDA receives no significant adverse
comments within the specified
comment period, the agency will
publish a document confirming the
effective date of the final rule in the
Federal Register within 30 days after
the comment period on this direct final
rule ends. If timely significant adverse
comments are received, the agency will
publish a notice of significant adverse
comment in the Federal Register
withdrawing this direct final rule before
May 2, 2006.
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2457-2458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 101
[CBP Dec. 05-38]
Extension of Port Limits of Rockford, IL
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection; Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule amends the Department of Homeland Security
regulations pertaining to the field organization of the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection by extending the geographical limits of
the port of entry at Rockford, Illinois, to include the City of
Rochelle, Illinois. The extension of the port is necessary to
accommodate the Union Pacific Railroad Company's new intermodal
facility in Rochelle. This change is part of the Bureau of
[[Page 2458]]
Customs and Border Protection's continuing program to utilize more
efficiently its personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide
better service to carriers, importers, and the general public.
DATES: Effective Date: February 16, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Dore, Office of Field
Operations, 202-344-2776.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Union Pacific Railroad Company has a new state-of-the-art
intermodal rail facility that is located 25 miles south of Rockford in
Rochelle, Illinois. This facility provides the capacity necessary to
support the efficient interchange of shipments to and from rail
connections and to expedite the operation of trains and containers. In
order to accommodate this new facility, and provide better service to
carriers, importers, and the public, the Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) is extending the port limits of the port of Rockford,
Illinois, to include the City of Rochelle, Illinois.
A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning this extension was
published in the Federal Register (69 FR 50107) on August 13, 2004. No
comments were received in response to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. As CBP believes that the extension of the Port of Rockford,
Illinois, to include the City of Rochelle, will improve service to
importers and the rail transportation industry in Illinois, CBP is
expanding the limits of the port of Rockford as proposed.
New Port Limits of Rockford, Illinois
CBP extends the limits of the port of Rockford, Illinois, to
include the City of Rochelle, Illinois, so that the description of the
limits of port reads as follows:
Bounded to the north by the Illinois/Wisconsin border; bounded to
the west by Illinois State Route 26; bounded to the south by Interstate
Route 88; bounded to the east by Illinois State Route 23 to the
Wisconsin/Illinois border.
Authority
This change is being made under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and
19 U.S.C. 2, 66 and 1624, and the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public
Law 107-296 (November 25, 2002).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
With DHS approval, CBP establishes, expands, and consolidates CBP
ports of entry throughout the United States to accommodate the volume
of CBP-related activity in various parts of the country. It also will
not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, it is certified that this document is not
subject to the additional requirements of the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
In addition, DHS and the Office of Management and Budget have
determined that this final rule does not constitute a significant
regulatory action as defined under Executive Order 12866.
Signing Authority
The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a).
Accordingly, the final rule is signed by the Secretary of Homeland
Security.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101
Customs ports of entry, Exports, Imports, Organization and
functions (Government Agencies).
Amendment to the Regulations
0
For the reasons set forth above, 19 CFR part 101 is amended as set
forth below.
PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 is revised and the
specific authority provision for Sec. 101.3 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note
3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624,
1646a.
Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
* * * * *
Sec. 101.3 [Amended]
0
2. In the list of ports in Sec. 101.3(b)(1), under the state of
Illinois, the ``Limits of port'' column adjacent to ``Rockford'' in the
``Ports of entry'' column is amended by removing the citation ``T.D.
95-62'' and adding in its place ``CBP Dec. 05-38''.
Dated: January 3, 2006.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-359 Filed 1-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-06-U
