Approval of Section 112(l) Delegation of Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards; Indiana, 2225-2227 [E6-369]
Download as PDF
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices
participants with respect to the phase or
issue in the proceeding for which the
list is established.
The Commission staff is consulting
with the Georgia State Historic
Preservation Officer (hereinafter, SHPO)
and the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (hereinafter, Council)
pursuant to the Council’s regulations, 36
CFR part 800, implementing section 106
of the National Historic Preservation
Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. section 470
f), to prepare and execute a
programmatic agreement for managing
properties included in, or eligible for
inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places at the Morgan Falls
Hydroelectric Project No. 2237–013
(SHPO Reference Number HP–040120–
022).
The programmatic agreement, when
executed by the Commission, the SHPO,
and the Council, would satisfy the
Commission’s section 106
responsibilities for all individual
undertakings carried out in accordance
with the license until the license expires
or is terminated (36 CFR 800.13[e]). The
Commission’s responsibilities pursuant
to section 106 for the Morgan Falls
Project would be fulfilled through the
programmatic agreement, which the
Commission proposes to draft in
consultation with certain parties listed
below. The executed programmatic
agreement would be incorporated into
any Order issuing a license.
Georgia Power Company, as licensee
for Project No. 2237, and the Muskogee
(Creek) Nation of Oklahoma, the Poarch
Band of Creek Indians, the Thlopthlocco
Tribal Town, the Kialegee Tribal Town,
the Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town, the
Seminole Indian Tribe, the Seminole
Nation of Oklahoma, the Cherokee
Nation, the Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians, the United Keetoowah Band of
Cherokee Indians, and the National Park
Service have expressed an interest in
this proceding and are invited to
participate in consultations to develop
the programmatic agreement.
For purposes of commenting on the
programmatic agreement, we propose to
restrict the service list for the
aforementioned project as follows:
Don Klima or Representative, Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation, The
Old Post Office Building, Suite 803,
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20004.
Larry Wall and Scott Hendricks or
Representative, Georgia Power
Company, 241 Ralph McGill Blvd,
Atlanta, GA 30308.
Elizabeth Shirk or Representative,
Georgia Department of Natural
Resources, Historic Preservation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Jan 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Division, 34 Peachtree Street, NW.,
Suite 1600, Atlanta, GA 30303–2316.
Jeff Duncan or Representative, National
Park Service, 175 Hamm Rd, Suite C,
Chattanooga, TN 37405.
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians,
Attention: Michelle Hamilton, THPO,
Qualla Boundary, P.O. Box 455,
Cherokee, NC 28719.
Dr. Richard L. Allen, Policy Analyst,
Cherokee Nation, P.O. Box 948,
Tahlequah, Oklahoma 74465.
Evelyn Bucktrot, Town King, Kialegee
Tribal Town, P.O. Box 332, 108 N.
Main Street, Wetumka, OK 74883.
Emman Spain, Seminole Nation of
Oklahoma, P.O. Box 1498, Wewoka,
OK 74884.
Willard Steele, Seminole Tribe of
Florida, Ah-Tah-Thi-Ki Museum, HC
61, Box 21 A, Clewiston, FL 33440.
Robert Thrower, Poarch Band of Creek
Indians, 5811 Jack Springs Rd.,
Atmore, AL 36502.
Charles Coleman, Thlopthlocco Tribal
Town, Rt. 1 Box 190–A, Weleetka, OK
74880.
Augustine Asbury, Alabama-Quassarte
Tribal Town, P.O. Box 187, Wetumka,
OK 74883.
Joyce Bear, Muskogee (Creek) Nation,
P.O. Box 580, Highway 75 and Loop
56, Okmulgee, OK 74447.
Steve Mouse, United Keetoowah Board
of Cherokee Indians, P.O. Box 189,
Parkhill, OK 74456.
Any person on the official service list
for the above-captioned proceeding may
request inclusion on the restricted
service list, or may request that a
restricted service list not be established,
by filing a motion to that effect within
15 days of this notice date. In a request
for inclusion, please identify the
reason(s) why there is an interest to be
included. Also please identify any
concerns about historic properties,
including Traditional Cultural
Properties. If historic properties are to
be identified within the motion, please
use a separate page, and label it NonPublic Information.
An original and 8 copies of any such
motion must be filed with Ms. Magalie
R. Salas, the Secretary of the
Commission (888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426), and must be
served on each person whose name
appears on the official service list.
Please put the project name ‘‘Morgan
Falls Hydroelectric Project’’ and number
‘‘P–2237–013’’ on the front cover of any
motion. If no such motions are filed, the
restricted service list will be effective at
the end of the 15 day period. Otherwise,
a further notice will be issued ruling on
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2225
any motion or motions filed within the
15 day period.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–285 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[IN166–1; FRL–8021–3]
Approval of Section 112(l) Delegation
of Maximum Achievable Control
Technology Standards; Indiana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public
that delegation of the authority to
implement and enforce the following
maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) standards was
approved in a letter from EPA to IDEM
dated November 30, 2005: Chemical
Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft,
Soda Sulfite, and Stand-alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills; Petroleum
Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units,
Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur
Recovery Units; Manufacturing of
Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather
Finishing Operations; Cellulose
Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire
Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals
Production; Amino and Phenolic
Resins; Polyether Polyols Production;
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil
Production; Semiconductor
Manufacturing; Refractory Products
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Large
Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal
Coil; Paper and Other Web Coating;
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication
Operations; Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills; Friction Material
Manufacturing Facilities; Polyvinyl
Chloride and Copolymers Production;
Secondary Aluminum; Asphalt
Processing and Asphalt Roofing; Brick
and Structural Clay Products; Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke Ovens:
Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks;
Engine Test Cells/Stands; Hydrochloric
Acid Production; Printing, Coating and
Dyeing Fabrics and other Textiles;
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture;
Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products; Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines; Organic Liquid
Distribution (Non-Gasoline);
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of
Automobiles; Surface Coating of Metal
Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
2226
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Coating Manufacturing; Stationary
Combustion Turbines; Lime
Manufacturing Plants; Iron and Steel
Foundries; and Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing; Mercury Cell ChlorAlkali Plants.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the State’s
submittal and other supporting
information used in developing the
approval are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the
following location: EPA Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, AR–18J,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Please contact
Sam Portanova at (312) 886–3189 to
arrange a time if inspection of the
submittal is desired.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam
Portanova, AR–18J, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 886–3189,
portanova.sam@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking today?
The purpose of this notice is to
announce that EPA approved a request
for delegation of the MACT standards
for Chemical Recovery Combustion
Sources at Kraft, Soda Sulfite, and
Stand-alone Semichemical Pulp Mills;
Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking
Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and
Sulfur Recovery Units; Manufacturing of
Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather
Finishing Operations; Cellulose
Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire
Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals
Production; Amino and Phenolic
Resins; Polyether Polyols Production;
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil
Production; Semiconductor
Manufacturing; Refractory Products
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Large
Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal
Coil; Paper and Other Web Coating;
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication
Operations; Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills; Friction Material
Manufacturing Facilities; Polyvinyl
Chloride and Copolymers Production;
Secondary Aluminum; Asphalt
Processing and Asphalt Roofing; Brick
and Structural Clay Products; Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke Ovens:
Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks;
Engine Test Cells/Stands; Hydrochloric
Acid Production; Printing, Coating and
Dyeing Fabrics and other Textiles;
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture;
Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products; Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines; Organic Liquid
Distribution (Non-Gasoline);
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of
Automobiles; Surface Coating of Metal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Jan 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous
Coating Manufacturing; Stationary
Combustion Turbines; Lime
Manufacturing Plants; Iron and Steel
Foundries; and Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing; Mercury Cell ChlorAlkali Plants (i.e., 40 CFR part 63,
subparts: MM, UUU, CCCC, HHHH,
TTTT, UUUU, XXXX, GGG, OOO, PPP,
GGGG, BBBBB, SSSSS, NNNN, SSSS,
JJJJ, MMMMM, AAAA, QQQQQ, J, RRR,
LLLLL, JJJJJ, KKKKK, CCCCC, PPPPP,
NNNNN, OOOO, RRRR, QQQQ, ZZZZ,
EEEE, FFFF, IIII, KKKK, GGGGG,
HHHHH, YYYY, AAAAA, EEEEE,
FFFFF, and IIIII respectively). EPA also
delegated the applicable Category I
authorities for these standards and all
previously delegated standards under
the general provisions as set forth in 40
CFR 63.91(g) pursuant to section 112(l)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State’s
mechanism of delegation involves State
rule adoption of all existing and future
section 112 standards unchanged from
the Federal standards. The actual
delegation of authority of individual
standards was implemented by a letter
dated November 30, 2005 from EPA to
the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM).
All notifications, reports and other
correspondence required under section
112 standards should be sent to the
State of Indiana rather than to the EPA,
Region 5, in Chicago. Affected sources
should send this information to: Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management, Office of Air Management,
100 North Senate Avenue, P.O. Box
6015, Indianapolis, Indiana 46206–
6015.
Pursuant to Section 112(l)(7) of the
CAA, nothing in this delegation
prohibits EPA from enforcing any
applicable emission standard or
requirement.
II. EPA approved the delegation under
what authority?
On November 14, 1995, EPA
approved Indiana’s program of
delegation for part 70 sources (Federal
Register (60 FR 57118)). On July 8,
1997, EPA approved Indiana’s program
of delegation for non-part 70 sources
(Federal Register (62 FR 36460)). The
approved program of delegation met the
criteria for approval for straight
delegation found in 40 CFR 63.91(d),
specifically an approved Title V
program. The approved program of
delegation can be used to delegate
MACT standards unchanged from the
federal standards to Indiana since
Indiana has satisfied the Section
63.91(d) up-front approval requirements
and it continues to maintain an
approved Title V program.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Which standards has IDEM
submitted to EPA for approval under
Indiana’s air toxics program delegation
mechanism?
On February 14, 2005 and September
19, 2005, IDEM requested delegation of
implementation and enforcement
authority of the MACT standards for
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources
at Kraft, Soda Sulfite, and Stand-alone
Semichemical Pulp Mills; Petroleum
Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units,
Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur
Recovery Units; Manufacturing of
Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather
Finishing Operations; Cellulose
Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire
Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals
Production; Amino and Phenolic
Resins; Polyether Polyols Production;
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil
Production; Semiconductor
Manufacturing; Refractory Products
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Large
Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal
Coil; Paper and Other Web Coating;
Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication
Operations; Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills; Friction Material
Manufacturing Facilities; Polyvinyl
Chloride and Copolymers Production;
Secondary Aluminum; Asphalt
Processing and Asphalt Roofing; Brick
and Structural Clay Products; Clay
Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke Ovens:
Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks;
Engine Test Cells/Stands; Hydrochloric
Acid Production; Printing, Coating and
Dyeing Fabrics and other Textiles;
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture;
Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products; Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines; Organic Liquid
Distribution (Non-Gasoline);
Miscellaneous Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of
Automobiles; Surface Coating of Metal
Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous
Coating Manufacturing; Stationary
Combustion Turbines; Lime
Manufacturing Plants; Iron and Steel
Foundries; and Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing; Mercury Cell ChlorAlkali Plants (i.e., 40 CFR part 63,
subparts: MM, UUU, CCCC, HHHH,
TTTT, UUUU, XXXX, GGG, OOO, PPP,
GGGG, BBBBB, SSSSS, NNNN, SSSS,
JJJJ, MMMMM, AAAA, QQQQQ, J, RRR,
LLLLL, JJJJJ, KKKKK, CCCCC, PPPPP,
NNNNN, OOOO, RRRR, QQQQ, ZZZZ,
EEEE, FFFF, IIII, KKKK, GGGGG,
HHHHH, YYYY, AAAAA, EEEEE,
FFFFF, and IIIII respectively). The State
of Indiana’s rules 326 Indiana
Administrative Code (IAC) 20–49, 326
IAC 20–50, 326 IAC 20–51, 326 IAC 20–
52, 326 IAC 20–53, 326 IAC 20–54, 326
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices
IAC 20–55, 326 IAC 20–57, 326 IAC 20–
58, 326 IAC 20–59, 326 IAC 20–60, 326
IAC 20–61, 326 IAC 20–62, 326 IAC 20–
63, 326 IAC 20–64, 326 IAC 20–65, 326
IAC 20–66, 326 IAC 20–67, 326 IAC 20–
68, 326 IAC 20–69, 326 IAC 20–70, 326
IAC 20–71, 326 IAC 20–72, 326 IAC 20–
73, 326 IAC 20–74, 326 IAC 20–75, 326
IAC 20–76, 326 IAC 20–77, 326 IAC 20–
78, 326 IAC 20–79, 326 IAC 20–82, 326
IAC 20–83, 326 IAC 20–84, 326 IAC 20–
85, 326 IAC 20–86, 326 IAC 20–87, 326
IAC 20–88, 326 IAC 20–90, 326 IAC 20–
91, 326 IAC 20–92, 326 IAC 20–93, and
326 IAC 20–94 incorporate these MACT
standards into the State’s rules
unchanged from the Federal regulations.
Dated: December 29, 2005.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E6–369 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER-FRL–6671–3]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 1,
2005 (70 FR 16815).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20050298, ERP No. D–AFS–
J65448–UT, West Bear Vegetation
Management Project, Timber
Harvesting, Prescribed Burning, Roads
Construction, Township 1 North,
Range 9 East, Salt Lake Principle
Meridian, Evanston Ranger District,
Wasatch-Cache National Forest,
Summit County, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about the
potential for impacts to aquatic and
terrestrial resources, and identified the
need for additional information on
monitoring and mitigation. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050351, ERP No. D–SFW–
K65493–CA, East Contra Costa County
Habitat Conservation Plan and
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, Implementation, Incidental Take
Permit, Cities of Brentwood, Clayton,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Jan 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Oakley and Pittsburg, Contra Costa
County, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns
about the uncertainties of preserve land
acquisition in areas with conflicting
General Plan zoning or in
nonparticipating jurisdictions, and
requested additional information
regarding alternatives to these
acquisition areas to protect covered
species. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050399, ERP No. D–BLM–
L65496–AK, Ring of Fire Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Alaska Peninsula , Kodiak Island and
Aleutain Islands, AK.
Summary: EPA generally supports the
proposal to designate the Neacola
Mountains Area of Critical
Environmental Concern (ACEC), Knik
River and Haines Block Special
Recreation Management Areas.
However, EPA has concerns about the
adequacy of some required operating
procedures and lease stipulations and
recommended improvements for
consideration in the Final EIS. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20050452, ERP No. D–BLM–
G65099–NM, Kasha-Katuwe Tent
Rocks National Monument Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Rio Puerco Field Office, Sandoval
County, NM.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
selection of the preferred alternative.
Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050454, ERP No. D–FRC–
D03005–00, Cove Point Expansion
Project, Construction and Operation
of a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Import Terminal Expansion and
Natural Gas Pipeline Facilities, U.S.
Army COE Section 404 Permit, Docket
Nos. CPO5–130–000, CP05–131–000
and CP05–132–00, PA, VA, WV, NY
and MD.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns and requested
that the Final EIS include mitigation
plans for both air quality and wetland
impacts, as well as address
environmental justice issues related to
the project. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20050426, ERP No. F–FTA–
K40243–CA, Mid-City/Westside
Transit Corridor Improvements,
Wilshire Bus Rapid Transit and
Exposition Transitway, Construction
and Operation, Funding, Section 404
Permit, Los Angeles County, CA.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed project.
EIS No. 20050457, ERP No. F–IBR–
K65252–CA, Lake Berryessa Visitor
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2227
Services Plans, Future Use and
Operation, Solano Project Lake
Berryessa, Napa County, CA.
Summary: EPA’s earlier concerns
were addressed in the Final EIS;
therefore, EPA does not object to the
proposed action.
EIS No. 20050480, ERP No. F–NOA–
K39092–CA, Programmatic—Montrose
Settlements Restoration Plan,
Restoration of Inquired Natural
Resources, Channel Islands, Southern
California Bight, Baja California
Pacific Islands, Orange County, CA.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action.
EIS No. 20050485, ERP No. F–FRC–
K05059–CA, Upper North Fork
Feather River Project (FERC No.
2105), Issuance of a New License for
existing 3517.3 megawatt (MW)
Hydroelectric Facility located in
North Fork Feather River and Butt
Creek, Plumas County, CA.
Summary: EPA’s previous issues have
been resolved; therefore, EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20050489, ERP No. F–IBR–
J39032–00, Operation of Flaming
Gorge Dam Colorado River Storage
Project, Protection and Assistance in
the Recovery of Populations and
Designated Critical Habitat of Four
Endangered Fishes: Bony Tail,
Colorado Pikeminnow, Humpback
Chub, and Razorback Sucker, Green
River, UT and WY.
Summary: EPA supports the proposed
operation and other management
activities in the FEIS that are
recommended to conserve, protect, and
promote the recovery of the populations
and designated critical habitat for
endangered fish species.
EIS No. 20050492, ERP No. F–AFS–
J65454–SD, Bugtown Gulch Mountain
Pine Beetle and Fuels Projects, To
Implement Multiple Resource
Management Actions, Black Hills
National Forest, Hell Canyon Ranger
District, Custer County, SD.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about impacts
to water quality from roads
construction, run-off and soil erosion,
and cumulative impacts from other,
large timber projects to vegetation and
habitat.
EIS No. 20050494, ERP No. F–NOA–
L39063–AK, Amendments to the
Alaska Coastal Management Program,
Approval, Implementation and
Funding, US Army COE 404 Permit,
AK.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about the
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2225-2227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-369]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[IN166-1; FRL-8021-3]
Approval of Section 112(l) Delegation of Maximum Achievable
Control Technology Standards; Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public that delegation of the authority
to implement and enforce the following maximum achievable control
technology (MACT) standards was approved in a letter from EPA to IDEM
dated November 30, 2005: Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft,
Soda Sulfite, and Stand-alone Semichemical Pulp Mills; Petroleum
Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and
Sulfur Recovery Units; Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather Finishing Operations; Cellulose
Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals
Production; Amino and Phenolic Resins; Polyether Polyols Production;
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production; Semiconductor
Manufacturing; Refractory Products Manufacturing; Surface Coating of
Large Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal Coil; Paper and Other Web
Coating; Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations; Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills; Friction Material Manufacturing Facilities;
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production; Secondary Aluminum;
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing; Brick and Structural Clay
Products; Clay Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching,
and Battery Stacks; Engine Test Cells/Stands; Hydrochloric Acid
Production; Printing, Coating and Dyeing Fabrics and other Textiles;
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture; Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products; Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; Organic Liquid
Distribution (Non-Gasoline); Miscellaneous Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Automobiles; Surface Coating of Metal
Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous
[[Page 2226]]
Coating Manufacturing; Stationary Combustion Turbines; Lime
Manufacturing Plants; Iron and Steel Foundries; and Integrated Iron and
Steel Manufacturing; Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's submittal and other supporting
information used in developing the approval are available for
inspection during normal business hours at the following location: EPA
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Please contact Sam Portanova at (312) 886-3189 to arrange a time if
inspection of the submittal is desired.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam Portanova, AR-18J, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3189,
portanova.sam@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA taking today?
The purpose of this notice is to announce that EPA approved a
request for delegation of the MACT standards for Chemical Recovery
Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda Sulfite, and Stand-alone Semichemical
Pulp Mills; Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic
Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units; Manufacturing of
Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather
Finishing Operations; Cellulose Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire
Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals Production; Amino and Phenolic Resins;
Polyether Polyols Production; Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil
Production; Semiconductor Manufacturing; Refractory Products
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Large Appliances; Surface Coating of
Metal Coil; Paper and Other Web Coating; Flexible Polyurethane Foam
Fabrication Operations; Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; Friction
Material Manufacturing Facilities; Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers
Production; Secondary Aluminum; Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing;
Brick and Structural Clay Products; Clay Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke
Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks; Engine Test Cells/
Stands; Hydrochloric Acid Production; Printing, Coating and Dyeing
Fabrics and other Textiles; Surface Coating of Metal Furniture; Surface
Coating of Wood Building Products; Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines; Organic Liquid Distribution (Non-Gasoline); Miscellaneous
Organic Chemical Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Automobiles; Surface
Coating of Metal Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous Coating
Manufacturing; Stationary Combustion Turbines; Lime Manufacturing
Plants; Iron and Steel Foundries; and Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing; Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (i.e., 40 CFR part 63,
subparts: MM, UUU, CCCC, HHHH, TTTT, UUUU, XXXX, GGG, OOO, PPP, GGGG,
BBBBB, SSSSS, NNNN, SSSS, JJJJ, MMMMM, AAAA, QQQQQ, J, RRR, LLLLL,
JJJJJ, KKKKK, CCCCC, PPPPP, NNNNN, OOOO, RRRR, QQQQ, ZZZZ, EEEE, FFFF,
IIII, KKKK, GGGGG, HHHHH, YYYY, AAAAA, EEEEE, FFFFF, and IIIII
respectively). EPA also delegated the applicable Category I authorities
for these standards and all previously delegated standards under the
general provisions as set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) pursuant to section
112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The State's mechanism of delegation
involves State rule adoption of all existing and future section 112
standards unchanged from the Federal standards. The actual delegation
of authority of individual standards was implemented by a letter dated
November 30, 2005 from EPA to the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM).
All notifications, reports and other correspondence required under
section 112 standards should be sent to the State of Indiana rather
than to the EPA, Region 5, in Chicago. Affected sources should send
this information to: Indiana Department of Environmental Management,
Office of Air Management, 100 North Senate Avenue, P.O. Box 6015,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015.
Pursuant to Section 112(l)(7) of the CAA, nothing in this
delegation prohibits EPA from enforcing any applicable emission
standard or requirement.
II. EPA approved the delegation under what authority?
On November 14, 1995, EPA approved Indiana's program of delegation
for part 70 sources (Federal Register (60 FR 57118)). On July 8, 1997,
EPA approved Indiana's program of delegation for non-part 70 sources
(Federal Register (62 FR 36460)). The approved program of delegation
met the criteria for approval for straight delegation found in 40 CFR
63.91(d), specifically an approved Title V program. The approved
program of delegation can be used to delegate MACT standards unchanged
from the federal standards to Indiana since Indiana has satisfied the
Section 63.91(d) up-front approval requirements and it continues to
maintain an approved Title V program.
III. Which standards has IDEM submitted to EPA for approval under
Indiana's air toxics program delegation mechanism?
On February 14, 2005 and September 19, 2005, IDEM requested
delegation of implementation and enforcement authority of the MACT
standards for Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda
Sulfite, and Stand-alone Semichemical Pulp Mills; Petroleum Refineries:
Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur
Recovery Units; Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast; Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production; Leather Finishing Operations; Cellulose
Products Manufacturing; Rubber Tire Manufacturing; Pharmaceuticals
Production; Amino and Phenolic Resins; Polyether Polyols Production;
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production; Semiconductor
Manufacturing; Refractory Products Manufacturing; Surface Coating of
Large Appliances; Surface Coating of Metal Coil; Paper and Other Web
Coating; Flexible Polyurethane Foam Fabrication Operations; Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills; Friction Material Manufacturing Facilities;
Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production; Secondary Aluminum;
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing; Brick and Structural Clay
Products; Clay Ceramics Manufacturing; Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching,
and Battery Stacks; Engine Test Cells/Stands; Hydrochloric Acid
Production; Printing, Coating and Dyeing Fabrics and other Textiles;
Surface Coating of Metal Furniture; Surface Coating of Wood Building
Products; Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; Organic Liquid
Distribution (Non-Gasoline); Miscellaneous Organic Chemical
Manufacturing; Surface Coating of Automobiles; Surface Coating of Metal
Cans; Site Remediation; Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing; Stationary
Combustion Turbines; Lime Manufacturing Plants; Iron and Steel
Foundries; and Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing; Mercury Cell
Chlor-Alkali Plants (i.e., 40 CFR part 63, subparts: MM, UUU, CCCC,
HHHH, TTTT, UUUU, XXXX, GGG, OOO, PPP, GGGG, BBBBB, SSSSS, NNNN, SSSS,
JJJJ, MMMMM, AAAA, QQQQQ, J, RRR, LLLLL, JJJJJ, KKKKK, CCCCC, PPPPP,
NNNNN, OOOO, RRRR, QQQQ, ZZZZ, EEEE, FFFF, IIII, KKKK, GGGGG, HHHHH,
YYYY, AAAAA, EEEEE, FFFFF, and IIIII respectively). The State of
Indiana's rules 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 20-49, 326 IAC
20-50, 326 IAC 20-51, 326 IAC 20-52, 326 IAC 20-53, 326 IAC 20-54, 326
[[Page 2227]]
IAC 20-55, 326 IAC 20-57, 326 IAC 20-58, 326 IAC 20-59, 326 IAC 20-60,
326 IAC 20-61, 326 IAC 20-62, 326 IAC 20-63, 326 IAC 20-64, 326 IAC 20-
65, 326 IAC 20-66, 326 IAC 20-67, 326 IAC 20-68, 326 IAC 20-69, 326 IAC
20-70, 326 IAC 20-71, 326 IAC 20-72, 326 IAC 20-73, 326 IAC 20-74, 326
IAC 20-75, 326 IAC 20-76, 326 IAC 20-77, 326 IAC 20-78, 326 IAC 20-79,
326 IAC 20-82, 326 IAC 20-83, 326 IAC 20-84, 326 IAC 20-85, 326 IAC 20-
86, 326 IAC 20-87, 326 IAC 20-88, 326 IAC 20-90, 326 IAC 20-91, 326 IAC
20-92, 326 IAC 20-93, and 326 IAC 20-94 incorporate these MACT
standards into the State's rules unchanged from the Federal
regulations.
Dated: December 29, 2005.
Gary Gulezian,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E6-369 Filed 1-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P