Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge and Wetland Management District, Martin, SD, 2264-2265 [E6-302]
Download as PDF
2264
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices
Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program.)
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
R. David Paulison,
Acting Director, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E6–310 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
Notice of Availability of the Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment for
Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge and
Wetland Management District, Martin,
SD
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5045–N–02]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES:
Effective January 13, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, Room 7262,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information at
1–800–927–7588.
In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 5, 2006.
Mark R. Johnson,
Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance
Programs.
[FR Doc. 06–222 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–29–M
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Jan 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) announces that the
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
and Environmental Assessment (CCP/
EA) for the Lacreek National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge) and Wetland
Management District (WMD) is available
for public review and comment. This
Draft CCP/EA was prepared pursuant to
the National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act, as amended, and
the National Environmental Policy Act.
The Draft CCP/EA describes the
Service’s proposal for management of
the Refuge for 15 years.
DATES: Written comments must be
received at the postal or electronic
addresses listed below by February 13,
2006. Comments may also be submitted
via electronic mail to:
linda_kelly@fws.gov.
To provide written
comments or to obtain a copy of the
Draft CCP/EA, please write to Linda
Kelly, Planning Team Leader, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486,
Denver Federal Center, Denver,
Colorado 80225–0486; (303) 236–8132;
fax (303) 236–4792, or Tom Koerner,
Refuge Manager, Lacreek National
Wildlife Refuge, 29746 Bird Road,
Martin, South Dakota, 57551; (605) 685–
6508; fax (605) 685–1173. The Draft
CCP/EA will also be available for
viewing and downloading online at
https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/
planning.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Kelly, Planning Team Leader, at
the above address or at (303) 236–8132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), requires the Service to
develop a CCP for the Refuge. The
purpose in developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and wildlife science; conservation; legal
mandates; and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, the CCP identifies
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting;
wildlife observation and photography;
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update these CCPs at least every 15
years in accordance with the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration
Act of 1966, as amended by the National
Wildlife Refuge System Improvement
Act of 1997, and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370d).
Background: The Refuge was
established in 1935 by President
Franklin D. Roosevelt through Executive
Order No. 7160 ‘‘* * * as a refuge and
breeding ground for migratory birds and
other wildlife.’’ The Refuge lies in the
Lake Creek Valley on the northern edge
of the Nebraska Sandhills and includes
16,410 acres of native sandhills, subirrigated meadows, impounded fresh
water marshes, and tall and mixed grass
prairie uplands.
The WMD was started as part of the
Small Wetlands Acquisition Program, in
the 1950s, to save wetlands from various
threats, particularly draining. The
passage of Public Law 85–585, in
August of 1958, amended the Migratory
Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp
Act (Duck Stamp Act) of 1934, allowing
for the acquisition of Waterfowl
Production Areas and Easements for
Waterfowl Management Rights
(easements). The WMD is located in
Stanley, Todd, Harding, Jackson, Jones,
Lawrence, Lyman, Meade, Mellette, Fall
River, Haakon, Custer, Pennington,
Bennett, and Butte counties.
Significant issues addressed in the
Draft CCP/EA include: habitat and
wildlife management; visitor services;
cultural resources; and partnerships.
The Service developed three
alternatives for management of the
Refuge: Alternative A—No Action;
Alternative B—Integrated Restoration
(Proposed Action); Alternative C—
Comprehensive Grassland Restoration.
All three alternatives outline specific
management objectives and strategies
related to wildlife and habitat
management, visitor services, cultural
resources, and partnerships.
Alternative A—Current Management
(No Action): Under this alternative,
management activity being conducted
by the Service would remain the same.
The Service would not develop any new
management, restoration, or education
programs at the Refuge. Current habitat
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2006 / Notices
and wildlife practices benefiting
migratory species and other wildlife
would not be expanded or changed. The
staff would perform limited, issuedriven research and only monitor longterm vegetation change. No new species
management would be initiated,
including black-tailed prairie dogs. No
new funding or staff levels would occur,
and programs would follow the same
direction, emphasis, and intensity as
they do at present. The staff would
continue to manage the WMD through
monitoring and enforcing easements.
Alternative B—Integrated Restoration
(Proposed Action): This alternative is
the proposed action for the Refuge and
WMD Draft CCP/EA. Through an
integrated restoration approach, the
Refuge would strive to restore ecological
processes and achieve habitat
conditions that require reduced
management over time while
recognizing the place of the Refuge in
the overall landscape and community.
An emphasis on monitoring the effects
of habitat management practices and use
of the research results to direct ongoing
restoration would be a priority. Current
levels of priority public uses and
activity would increase. New species
management would be initiated for
black-tailed prairie dogs to facilitate
prairie restoration efforts and reduce
damage to adjacent private lands. The
staff would continue to manage the
WMD through monitoring and
enforcement of easements.
Alternative C—Comprehensive
Grassland Restoration: Under this
alternative, the Refuge staff would focus
management on restoration of grassland
habitat and its associated species.
Current levels of priority wildlifedependent public uses would increase
with educational priorities placed on
habitat restoration. Research activities
would focus on management practices
on targeted grassland species. No new
species management would be initiated,
including black-tailed prairie dogs. The
staff would continue to manage the
WMD through monitoring and
enforcement of easements.
The review and comment period is 30
calendar days commencing with
publication of this Notice of Availability
in the Federal Register. After the review
and comment period for this Draft CCP/
EA, all comments will be analyzed and
considered by the Service. All
comments received from individuals on
the Draft CCP/EA become part of the
official public record. Requests for such
comments will be handled in
accordance with the Freedom of
Information Act and other Service and
Departmental policies and procedures.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:41 Jan 12, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Ralph O. Morgenweck,
Regional Director, Region 6, Denver, CO.
[FR Doc. E6–302 Filed 1–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Receipt of Application of Endangered
Species Recovery Permits
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
receipt of applications.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We announce our receipt of
applications to conduct certain
activities pertaining to enhancement of
survival of endangered species.
DATES: Written comments on this
request for a permit must be received by
February 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written data or comments
should be submitted to the Assistant
Regional Director—Ecological Services,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box
25486, Denver Federal Center, Denver,
Colorado 80225–0486; facsimile 303–
236–0027.
Availability of Documents:
Documents and other information
submitted with these applications are
available for review, subject to the
requirements of the Privacy Act [5
U.S.C. 552A] and Freedom of
Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552], by any
party who submits a request for a copy
of such documents within 20 days of the
date of publication of this notice to Kris
Olsen, by mail (see ADDRESSES) or by
telephone at 303–236–4256. All
comments received from individuals
become part of the official public
record.
The
following applicants have requested
issuance of enhancement of survival
permits to conduct certain activities
with endangered species pursuant to
Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Applicant: TE–115137, Kitty Roberts,
National Park Service, Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area, Page,
Arizona. The applicant requests a
permit to display Bonytails (Gila
elegans), Colorado pikeminnows
(Ptychocheilus lucius), Humpback
chubs (Gila cypha), and Razorback
suckers (Xyrauchen texanus) in
conjunction with recovery activities for
the purpose of enhancing their survival
and recovery.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2265
Applicant: TE–038221, Mark Peyton,
Central Nebraska Public Power and
Irrigation District, Gothenburg,
Nebraska. The applicant requests a
renewed permit to take American
burying beetles (Nicrophorus
americanus) and Interior least terns
(Sterna antillarum) in conjunction with
recovery activities throughout the
species’ range for the purpose of
enhancing their survival and recovery.
Applicant: TE–038970, Bill Krise,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Bozeman Fish Technology Center,
Bozeman, Montana. The applicant
requests a renewed permit to take Pallid
sturgeons (Scaphirhynchus albus) and
June suckers (Chasmistes liorus) in
conjunction with recovery activities
throughout the species’ range for the
purpose of enhancing their survival and
recovery.
Applicant: TE–039100, Rockford
Plettner, Nebraska Public Power
District, Columbus, Nebraska. The
applicant requests a renewed permit to
take Interior least terns (Sterna
antillarum athalassos) in conjunction
with recovery activities throughout the
species’ range for the purpose of
enhancing their survival and recovery.
Applicant: TE–040241, Roger Boyd,
Baker University, Baldwin City, Kansas.
The applicant requests a renewed
permit to take Interior least terns (Sterna
antillarum) in conjunction with
recovery activities throughout the
species’ range for the purpose of
enhancing their survival and recovery.
Applicant: TE–040242, Harold Tyus,
University of Colorado, Boulder,
Colorado. The applicant requests a
renewed permit to take Bonytails (Gila
elegans), Colorado pikeminnows
(Ptychocheilus lucius), Humpback
chubs (Gila cypha), and Razorback
suckers (Xyrauchen texanus) in
conjunction with recovery activities
throughout the species’ range for the
purpose of enhancing their survival and
recovery.
Applicant: TE–040748, Randy Barker,
Cheyenne Mountain Zoo, Colorado
Springs, Colorado. The applicant
requests a renewed permit to display
Black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes)
and Wyoming toads (Bufo baxteri) in
conjunction with recovery activities for
the purpose of enhancing their survival
and recovery.
Applicant: TE–044780, Peter Smith,
Smith Environmental, Broomfield,
Colorado. The applicant requests a
renewed permit to take Southwestern
willow flycatchers (Empidonax traillii
extimus) in conjunction with recovery
activities throughout the species’ range
for the purpose of enhancing their
survival and recovery.
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2264-2265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-302]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge
and Wetland Management District, Martin, SD
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces that
the Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
(CCP/EA) for the Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) and Wetland
Management District (WMD) is available for public review and comment.
This Draft CCP/EA was prepared pursuant to the National Wildlife Refuge
System Administration Act, as amended, and the National Environmental
Policy Act. The Draft CCP/EA describes the Service's proposal for
management of the Refuge for 15 years.
DATES: Written comments must be received at the postal or electronic
addresses listed below by February 13, 2006. Comments may also be
submitted via electronic mail to: linda_kelly@fws.gov.
ADDRESSES: To provide written comments or to obtain a copy of the Draft
CCP/EA, please write to Linda Kelly, Planning Team Leader, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center, Denver,
Colorado 80225-0486; (303) 236-8132; fax (303) 236-4792, or Tom
Koerner, Refuge Manager, Lacreek National Wildlife Refuge, 29746 Bird
Road, Martin, South Dakota, 57551; (605) 685-6508; fax (605) 685-1173.
The Draft CCP/EA will also be available for viewing and downloading
online at https://mountain-prairie.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Kelly, Planning Team Leader, at
the above address or at (303) 236-8132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), requires the
Service to develop a CCP for the Refuge. The purpose in developing a
CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of fish and
wildlife science; conservation; legal mandates; and Service policies.
In addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving
wildlife and their habitats, the CCP identifies wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting; wildlife observation and photography; and
environmental education and interpretation. We will review and update
these CCPs at least every 15 years in accordance with the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended by the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370d).
Background: The Refuge was established in 1935 by President
Franklin D. Roosevelt through Executive Order No. 7160 ``* * * as a
refuge and breeding ground for migratory birds and other wildlife.''
The Refuge lies in the Lake Creek Valley on the northern edge of the
Nebraska Sandhills and includes 16,410 acres of native sandhills, sub-
irrigated meadows, impounded fresh water marshes, and tall and mixed
grass prairie uplands.
The WMD was started as part of the Small Wetlands Acquisition
Program, in the 1950s, to save wetlands from various threats,
particularly draining. The passage of Public Law 85-585, in August of
1958, amended the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp Act
(Duck Stamp Act) of 1934, allowing for the acquisition of Waterfowl
Production Areas and Easements for Waterfowl Management Rights
(easements). The WMD is located in Stanley, Todd, Harding, Jackson,
Jones, Lawrence, Lyman, Meade, Mellette, Fall River, Haakon, Custer,
Pennington, Bennett, and Butte counties.
Significant issues addressed in the Draft CCP/EA include: habitat
and wildlife management; visitor services; cultural resources; and
partnerships. The Service developed three alternatives for management
of the Refuge: Alternative A--No Action; Alternative B--Integrated
Restoration (Proposed Action); Alternative C--Comprehensive Grassland
Restoration. All three alternatives outline specific management
objectives and strategies related to wildlife and habitat management,
visitor services, cultural resources, and partnerships.
Alternative A--Current Management (No Action): Under this
alternative, management activity being conducted by the Service would
remain the same. The Service would not develop any new management,
restoration, or education programs at the Refuge. Current habitat
[[Page 2265]]
and wildlife practices benefiting migratory species and other wildlife
would not be expanded or changed. The staff would perform limited,
issue-driven research and only monitor long-term vegetation change. No
new species management would be initiated, including black-tailed
prairie dogs. No new funding or staff levels would occur, and programs
would follow the same direction, emphasis, and intensity as they do at
present. The staff would continue to manage the WMD through monitoring
and enforcing easements.
Alternative B--Integrated Restoration (Proposed Action): This
alternative is the proposed action for the Refuge and WMD Draft CCP/EA.
Through an integrated restoration approach, the Refuge would strive to
restore ecological processes and achieve habitat conditions that
require reduced management over time while recognizing the place of the
Refuge in the overall landscape and community. An emphasis on
monitoring the effects of habitat management practices and use of the
research results to direct ongoing restoration would be a priority.
Current levels of priority public uses and activity would increase. New
species management would be initiated for black-tailed prairie dogs to
facilitate prairie restoration efforts and reduce damage to adjacent
private lands. The staff would continue to manage the WMD through
monitoring and enforcement of easements.
Alternative C--Comprehensive Grassland Restoration: Under this
alternative, the Refuge staff would focus management on restoration of
grassland habitat and its associated species. Current levels of
priority wildlife-dependent public uses would increase with educational
priorities placed on habitat restoration. Research activities would
focus on management practices on targeted grassland species. No new
species management would be initiated, including black-tailed prairie
dogs. The staff would continue to manage the WMD through monitoring and
enforcement of easements.
The review and comment period is 30 calendar days commencing with
publication of this Notice of Availability in the Federal Register.
After the review and comment period for this Draft CCP/EA, all comments
will be analyzed and considered by the Service. All comments received
from individuals on the Draft CCP/EA become part of the official public
record. Requests for such comments will be handled in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act and other Service and Departmental
policies and procedures.
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Ralph O. Morgenweck,
Regional Director, Region 6, Denver, CO.
[FR Doc. E6-302 Filed 1-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P