Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the Aga or Mariana Crow (Corvus kubaryi), 1766-1767 [E6-143]
Download as PDF
1766
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Notices
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF THE LISTING INFORMATION FOR THE MT. GRAHAM RED SQUIRREL AND LITTLE COLORADO
SPINEDACE
Common name
Scientific name
Status
Where listed
Mt. Graham red squirrel ....
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
grahamensis.
Lepidomeda vittata ............
Endangered .......................
U.S.A. (Arizona, California)
Threatened ........................
U.S.A. (Arizona) ................
Little Colorado spinedace ..
Definitions Related to This Notice
The following definitions are
provided to assist those persons who
contemplate submitting information
regarding the species being reviewed:
A. Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate, which
interbreeds when mature.
B. Endangered means any species that
is in danger of extinction throughout all
or a significant portion of its range.
C. Threatened means any species that
is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
How Do We Determine Whether a
Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act establishes
that we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the five following factors:
A. The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
our determination be made on the basis
of the best scientific and commercial
data available.
What Could Happen as a Result of This
Review?
If we find that there is new
information concerning Mt. Graham red
squirrel or Little Colorado spinedace
indicating a change in classification
may be warranted, we may propose a
new rule that could do one of the
following: (a) Reclassify the species
from endangered to threatened
(downlist); (b) reclassify the species
from threatened to endangered (uplist);
or (c) remove the species from the List.
If we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then
these species will remain on the List
under their current status.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Public Solicitation of New Information
We request any new information
concerning the status of Mt. Graham red
squirrel and Little Colorado spinedace.
See ‘‘What information is considered in
the review?’’ heading for specific
criteria. Information submitted should
be supported by documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data,
and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources. Our practice is
to make comments, including names
and home addresses of respondents,
available for public review. Individual
respondents may request that we
withhold their home addresses from the
supporting record, which we will honor
to the extent allowable by law. There
also may be circumstances in which we
may withhold from the supporting
record a respondent’s identity, as
allowable by law. If you wish us to
withhold your name and/or address,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comment. We will not
consider anonymous comments,
however. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Authority
Dated: November 1, 2005.
Larry G. Bell,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Fish and
Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E6–139 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the
Aga or Mariana Crow (Corvus kubaryi)
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
51 FR 10842 (31–MAR–
1986).
52 FR 35054 (16–SEPT–
1987).
Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (‘‘we’’) announces the
availability of the Draft Revised
Recovery Plan for the Aga or Mariana
Crow (Corvus kubaryi) for public review
and comment.
DATES: Comments on the draft revised
recovery plan must be received on or
before March 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised
recovery plan are available for
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the following
location: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office,
300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3–122,
Box 50088, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850
(phone: 808–792–9400). Requests for
copies of the draft revised recovery plan
and written comments and materials
regarding this plan should be addressed
to the Field Supervisor, Ecological
Services, at the above Honolulu address.
The draft revised plan is currently
available on the World Wide Web at
https://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/
index.html#plans.
Fred
Amidon, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, at
the above Honolulu address and
telephone number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
This document is published under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
AGENCY:
Final listing rule
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants is a primary goal of
the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and our endangered
species program. Recovery means
improvement of the status of listed
species to the point at which listing is
no longer required under the criteria set
out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish
criteria for downlisting or delisting
listed species, and estimate time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed for recovery.
The Act requires the development of
recovery plans for endangered or
threatened species unless such a plan
would not promote the conservation of
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Notices
the species. Section 4(f) of the Act
requires that public notice, and an
opportunity for public review and
comment, be provided during recovery
plan development. We will consider all
information presented during the public
comment period on each new or revised
recovery plan. Substantive comments
may result in changes to a recovery
plan. Comments regarding recovery plan
implementation may not necessarily
result in changes to the recovery plans,
but will be forwarded to the appropriate
Federal agency or other entities so that
they can take these comments into
account during the course of
implementing recovery actions.
Individual responses to comments will
not be provided.
The aga or Mariana crow is native to
the islands of Guam and Rota in the
Mariana Archipelago of the Pacific
Ocean. The aga has been listed as an
endangered species by the United States
since 1984, and is also listed by the
governments of the Territory of Guam
and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands. The last of the aga on
Guam disappeared sometime in 2002 or
2003. Currently, northern Guam has a
small population of 10 aga, all
individuals translocated from Rota.
Estimates for the island of Rota indicate
that approximately 85 pairs of aga
persist there, but this population is
apparently in decline.
Aga utilize a wide variety of forested
habitats including limestone, strand,
ravine, agricultural forest, and
secondary forests. However, available
evidence suggests that aga are most
abundant in native limestone forests. On
both Guam and Rota, aga nests have
been found exclusively in native species
of trees, which also serve as the primary
foraging sources for these birds.
The introduction of the exotic brown
treesnake (Boiga irregularis) to the
island of Guam in the late 1940’s is
believed to have been the primary cause
of the extirpation of aga from that
island. Brown treesnakes are not
established on Rota. The cause of the
observed decline in the aga population
on Rota, as well as parallel declines in
other forest birds on the island, is not
well understood, but may be due to a
combination of habitat loss, human
persecution, and possibly introduced
rats or other exotic predators.
Captive propagation of the aga in
mainland zoos was attempted in the
1990’s, but was largely unsuccessful.
Most of the captive individuals have
since been released back on Guam. The
translocation of individuals from Rota to
Guam has proven a more viable option,
and in recent years some of these birds
have paired and successfully nested on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Guam. Since the native aga on Guam
have been extirpated, recovery of the
species is now entirely dependent upon
the remaining population of aga on the
island of Rota.
This draft revised recovery plan
replaces the original recovery plan for
the aga, which was published in 1990
and addressed multiple species of
native forest birds of Guam and Rota.
The draft revised recovery plan was
developed by the Mariana Crow
Recovery Team, which includes
representatives from various Federal
agencies, the Guam Division of Aquatic
and Wildlife Resources, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands’ Division of Fish and Wildlife,
Andersen Air Force Base, the University
of Hawaii, and the University of
Washington. The primary objective of
this draft revised recovery plan is to
establish a total of at least three viable,
self-sustaining subpopulations of aga in
the wild, two on Guam and one on Rota.
The recovery program described in this
draft revised recovery plan includes
active research, habitat management,
predator control, translocation,
population monitoring, and community
involvement. The recovery actions are
designed to address threats to the aga in
order to achieve the recovery goal of
downlisting to threatened status and
then eventually delisting (removing
from the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants).
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit written comments on the
draft revised recovery plan described.
All comments received by the date
specified above will be considered prior
to approval of this plan.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: September 28, 2005.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
1767
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Corrections to the Notice of
Availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the Proposed
Cordova Oil Spill Response Facility,
Cordova, AK
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public
of two corrections to the Notice of
Availability of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed
Cordova Oil Spill Response Facility,
Cordova, Alaska, which was published
in the Federal Register on December 22,
2005 (70 FR 76066–76067) and which
described the proposed action. These
corrections are as follows:
• The two-letter abbreviation for
Alaska in the Notice heading was
incorrectly given as ‘‘AL.’’ The correct
abbreviation for Alaska is AK.
• The project website in the
ADDRESSES section of the Notice
was incorrect. The correct Web site
is https://www.cordovaresponsefacility.
com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin K’eit, (907) 586–7423.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in accordance with
sections 1503.1, 1506.6 and 1508.22 of
the Council of Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR, parts 1500 through
1508) implementing the procedural
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.),
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 1–6), and is in the exercise of
authority delegated to the Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs by 209 DM 8.
Dated: January 4, 2006.
Michael D. Olsen,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. E6–140 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on January 6, 2006.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FR Doc. E6–143 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
[WY–030–1310–DB]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
Correction to Notice of Availability of
the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Atlantic Rim Natural
Gas Development Project
PO 00000
Bureau of Land Management
AGENCY:
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1766-1767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-143]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the Aga or Mariana Crow (Corvus
kubaryi)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (``we'') announces the
availability of the Draft Revised Recovery Plan for the Aga or Mariana
Crow (Corvus kubaryi) for public review and comment.
DATES: Comments on the draft revised recovery plan must be received on
or before March 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft revised recovery plan are available for
inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
following location: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands
Fish and Wildlife Office, 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122, Box
50088, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 (phone: 808-792-9400). Requests for
copies of the draft revised recovery plan and written comments and
materials regarding this plan should be addressed to the Field
Supervisor, Ecological Services, at the above Honolulu address. The
draft revised plan is currently available on the World Wide Web
athttps://endangered.fws.gov/recovery/#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Amidon, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, at the above Honolulu address and telephone number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants is a
primary goal of the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) and our endangered species program. Recovery means improvement of
the status of listed species to the point at which listing is no longer
required under the criteria set out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish criteria for downlisting or
delisting listed species, and estimate time and cost for implementing
the measures needed for recovery.
The Act requires the development of recovery plans for endangered
or threatened species unless such a plan would not promote the
conservation of
[[Page 1767]]
the species. Section 4(f) of the Act requires that public notice, and
an opportunity for public review and comment, be provided during
recovery plan development. We will consider all information presented
during the public comment period on each new or revised recovery plan.
Substantive comments may result in changes to a recovery plan. Comments
regarding recovery plan implementation may not necessarily result in
changes to the recovery plans, but will be forwarded to the appropriate
Federal agency or other entities so that they can take these comments
into account during the course of implementing recovery actions.
Individual responses to comments will not be provided.
The aga or Mariana crow is native to the islands of Guam and Rota
in the Mariana Archipelago of the Pacific Ocean. The aga has been
listed as an endangered species by the United States since 1984, and is
also listed by the governments of the Territory of Guam and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The last of the aga on
Guam disappeared sometime in 2002 or 2003. Currently, northern Guam has
a small population of 10 aga, all individuals translocated from Rota.
Estimates for the island of Rota indicate that approximately 85 pairs
of aga persist there, but this population is apparently in decline.
Aga utilize a wide variety of forested habitats including
limestone, strand, ravine, agricultural forest, and secondary forests.
However, available evidence suggests that aga are most abundant in
native limestone forests. On both Guam and Rota, aga nests have been
found exclusively in native species of trees, which also serve as the
primary foraging sources for these birds.
The introduction of the exotic brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis)
to the island of Guam in the late 1940's is believed to have been the
primary cause of the extirpation of aga from that island. Brown
treesnakes are not established on Rota. The cause of the observed
decline in the aga population on Rota, as well as parallel declines in
other forest birds on the island, is not well understood, but may be
due to a combination of habitat loss, human persecution, and possibly
introduced rats or other exotic predators.
Captive propagation of the aga in mainland zoos was attempted in
the 1990's, but was largely unsuccessful. Most of the captive
individuals have since been released back on Guam. The translocation of
individuals from Rota to Guam has proven a more viable option, and in
recent years some of these birds have paired and successfully nested on
Guam. Since the native aga on Guam have been extirpated, recovery of
the species is now entirely dependent upon the remaining population of
aga on the island of Rota.
This draft revised recovery plan replaces the original recovery
plan for the aga, which was published in 1990 and addressed multiple
species of native forest birds of Guam and Rota. The draft revised
recovery plan was developed by the Mariana Crow Recovery Team, which
includes representatives from various Federal agencies, the Guam
Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands' Division of Fish and Wildlife, Andersen Air
Force Base, the University of Hawaii, and the University of Washington.
The primary objective of this draft revised recovery plan is to
establish a total of at least three viable, self-sustaining
subpopulations of aga in the wild, two on Guam and one on Rota. The
recovery program described in this draft revised recovery plan includes
active research, habitat management, predator control, translocation,
population monitoring, and community involvement. The recovery actions
are designed to address threats to the aga in order to achieve the
recovery goal of downlisting to threatened status and then eventually
delisting (removing from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants).
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit written comments on the draft revised recovery plan
described. All comments received by the date specified above will be
considered prior to approval of this plan.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: September 28, 2005.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register on January 6, 2006.
[FR Doc. E6-143 Filed 1-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P