City of Alameda-Acquisition Exemption-Alameda Beltline Railroad, 1785-1786 [E6-142]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Notices
as required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Nissan wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Section
543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption
applies only to vehicles that belong to
a line exempted under this part and
equipped with the anti-theft device on
which the line’s exemption is based.
Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ‘‘to modify an
exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that § 543.9(c)(2)
could place on exempted vehicle
manufacturers and itself. The agency
did not intend part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition
for every change to the components or
design of an antitheft device. The
significance of many such changes
could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA
suggests that if the manufacturer
contemplates making any changes the
effects of which might be characterized
as de minimis, it should consult the
agency before preparing and submitting
a petition to modify.
We note that Nissan requested
confidential treatment for the
information and attachments it
submitted in support of its petition.
While the agency granted the
petitioner’s request for confidential
treatment of most aspects of its petition,
we have released the model year for
which the exemption is granted. This
information is necessary for the law
enforcement efforts to combat motor
vehicle theft. That is, law enforcement
officials need to know whether a given
motor vehicle line was subject or
exempted from the parts-marking
requirements for a given model year.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Issued on: January 4, 2006.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E6–145 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34803]
The Town of Corinth, NY—Acquisition
and Operation Exemption—Canadian
Pacific Railway
The Town of Corinth, NY (Town), a
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to
acquire from Delaware and Hudson
Railway Company, Inc., doing business
as Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR),
certain assets of an approximately
16.45-mile rail line between Adirondack
Branch milepost 39.44 at or near
Saratoga Springs, NY, and Adirondack
Branch milepost 55.89 at or near
Corinth, NY. In addition, the Town will
acquire from CPR approximately .69
miles of incidental trackage rights,
extending from milepost 37.10 to
milepost 38.20 in Saratoga Springs, NY.
At the time of filing of the verified
notice, the Town and CPR were in the
process of finalizing one or more
agreements whereby the Town will
acquire the right-of-way, track and other
rail assets associated with the line,
subject to CPR’s reservation of an
exclusive and permanent freight
easement. The Town states that it will
have neither the right nor the obligation
to perform common carrier freight
service over the line, but instead intends
to provide intrastate scenic tour
passenger operations.1
The Town certifies that its projected
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not exceed those that would qualify
it as a Class III rail carrier.
The transaction was expected to be
consummated on or after December 31,
2005.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34803, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on RoseMichele Nardi, Weiner Brodsky Sidman
Kider PC, 1300 19th Street, NW., Fifth
Floor, Washington, DC 20036–1609.
1 For these reasons, the Town has simultaneously
filed a motion to dismiss the notice of exemption
in this proceeding. The Board will address the
motion in a separate decision.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1785
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: January 4, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–190 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34798]
City of Alameda—Acquisition
Exemption—Alameda Beltline Railroad
The City of Alameda (the City), a
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to
acquire the line of railroad owned by
the Alameda Beltline Railroad (ABL).
The earliest the transaction could
have been consummated was December
16, 2005 (7 days after filing the notice),
but, as noted below, the effectiveness of
the exemption has been stayed pending
further order of the Board.
The City certifies that its projected
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not result in the creation of a Class
II or Class I rail carrier.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
On December 15, 2005, ABL filed a
petition to stay the effectiveness of the
exemption sought by the City through
the filing of its notice under section
1150.31. On December 15, 2005, the
Board granted a housekeeping stay of
the effective date of the exemption in
this proceeding to allow time for the
parties to provide additional
information, and for the Board to
consider the issues presented in the stay
request. The exemption is stayed until
further order of the Board, and each
party has been given until January 17,
2006, to file additional pleadings.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34798, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on: (1) Charles
A. Montange, 426 NW., 162nd Street,
Seattle, WA 98177; and (2) Sidney L.
Strickland, Jr., Sidney Strickland and
Associates, PLLC, 3050 K Street, NW.,
Suite 101, Washington, DC 20007.
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
1786
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Notices
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Decided: January 5, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–142 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Currency
Transaction Report by Casinos
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As part of our continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, we invite comment
on a proposed extension, without
change, of an existing information
collection requirement contained in the
form, ‘‘Currency Transaction Report by
Casinos, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network Form 103.’’ This request for
comments is being made pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A).
DATES: Written comments are welcome
and must be received on or before
March 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: The Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network, Department of
the Treasury, Post Office Box 39,
Vienna, Virginia 22183, Attention:
Paperwork Reduction Act Comments—
Currency Transaction Report by Casinos
Form. Comments also may be submitted
by electronic mail to the following
Internet address:
regcomments@fincen.treas.gov, again
with a caption, in the body of the text,
‘‘Attention: Paperwork Reduction Act
Comments—Currency Transaction
Report by Casinos Form.’’
Inspection of comments. Comments
may be inspected, between 10 a.m. and
4 p.m., in the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network reading room in
Washington, D.C. Persons wishing to
inspect the comments submitted must
request an appointment by telephoning
(202) 354–6400.
1 Language expanding the scope of the Bank
Secrecy Act to intelligence or counter-intelligence
activities to protect against international terrorism
was added by Section 358 of the Uniting and
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Regulatory Policy and Programs
Division at (800) 949–2732.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title:
Currency Transaction Report by
Casinos.
OMB Number: 1506–0005.
Form Number: Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network Form 103.
Abstract: The statute generally
referred to as the ‘‘Bank Secrecy Act,’’
Titles I and II of Public Law 91–508, as
amended, codified at 12 U.S.C. 1829b,
12 U.S.C. 1951–1959, and 31 U.S.C.
5311–5332, authorizes the Secretary of
the Treasury inter alia to require
financial institutions to keep records
and file reports that are determined to
have a high degree of usefulness in
criminal, tax, and regulatory matters, or
in the conduct of intelligence or
counter-intelligence activities, to protect
against international terrorism, and to
implement counter-money laundering
programs and compliance procedures.1
Regulations implementing Title II of the
Bank Secrecy Act appear at 31 CFR part
103. The authority of the Secretary of
the Treasury to administer the Bank
Secrecy Act has been delegated to the
Director of the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network.
Section 5313(a) authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations that require a report when
‘‘a domestic financial institution is
involved in a transaction for the
payment, receipt, or transfer of United
States [sic] coins or currency (or other
monetary instruments the Secretary of
the Treasury prescribes), in an amount,
denomination, or amount and
denomination, or under circumstances
the Secretary prescribes.’’ Regulations
implementing section 5313(a) are found
at 31 CFR 103.22. In general, the
regulations require the reporting of
transactions in currency in excess of
$10,000 a day. Casinos, as defined in 31
U.S.C. 5312(a)(2)(X) and 31 CFR
103.11(n)(7)(i), are financial institutions
subject to the currency transaction
reporting requirement. Card clubs, as
defined in 31 CFR 103.11(n)(8)(i), are
casinos subject to currency transaction
reporting. (See 63 FR 1919, January 13,
1998.) The Currency Transaction Report
by Casinos, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network Form 103, is the
form casinos and card clubs (other than
those in Nevada) use to comply with the
currency transaction reporting
requirements.
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism
Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107–56.
2 This burden relates to the completion of the
Currency Transaction Report by Casinos form only.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The attached Currency Transaction
Report by Casinos is presented only for
purposes of soliciting public comment
on the form.
Type of Review: Extension, without
change, of an approved information
collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit institutions.
Frequency: As required.
Estimated Burden: Reporting average
of 20 minutes per response.2 Form
recordkeeping average of 10 minutes per
response, for a total of 30 minutes.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
600.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
418,866.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 209,433.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid Office of Management
and Budget control number. Records
required to be retained under the Bank
Secrecy Act must be retained for five
years.
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected: (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (e) estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance and purchase of services to
provide information.
Dated: January 5, 2006.
William J. Fox,
Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network.
Attachment: Currency Transaction
Report by Casinos, Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network Form 103.
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
The recordkeeping burden of 31 CFR 103.22 is
reflected in the final rule requiring casinos and card
clubs to file Currency Transaction Reports.
E:\FR\FM\11JAN1.SGM
11JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1785-1786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-142]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34798]
City of Alameda--Acquisition Exemption--Alameda Beltline Railroad
The City of Alameda (the City), a noncarrier, has filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire the line of
railroad owned by the Alameda Beltline Railroad (ABL).
The earliest the transaction could have been consummated was
December 16, 2005 (7 days after filing the notice), but, as noted
below, the effectiveness of the exemption has been stayed pending
further order of the Board.
The City certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this
transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class I
rail carrier.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
On December 15, 2005, ABL filed a petition to stay the
effectiveness of the exemption sought by the City through the filing of
its notice under section 1150.31. On December 15, 2005, the Board
granted a housekeeping stay of the effective date of the exemption in
this proceeding to allow time for the parties to provide additional
information, and for the Board to consider the issues presented in the
stay request. The exemption is stayed until further order of the Board,
and each party has been given until January 17, 2006, to file
additional pleadings.
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB
Finance Docket No. 34798, must be filed with the Surface Transportation
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a
copy of each pleading must be served on: (1) Charles A. Montange, 426
NW., 162nd Street, Seattle, WA 98177; and (2) Sidney L. Strickland,
Jr., Sidney Strickland and Associates, PLLC, 3050 K Street, NW., Suite
101, Washington, DC 20007.
[[Page 1786]]
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http:/
/www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: January 5, 2006.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-142 Filed 1-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P