TRICARE; Revision of Participating Providers Reimbursement Rate; TRICARE Dental Program (TDP), 1695-1696 [06-219]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
history records and related fees for
administering the Act;
(2) Developing a certification form for
execution by authorized employers
under § 105.25(a) and receiving
authorized employers’ certifications;
(3) Receiving the fingerprint
submissions and fees from the
authorized employer; performing a
check of state criminal history records;
if necessary, transmitting the
fingerprints to the FBI; remitting the FBI
fees consistent with established
interagency agreements; and receiving
the results of the FBI check;
(4) Applying the relevant standards to
any CHRI returned by the fingerprint
check and notifying the authorized
employer of the results of the
application of the standards as required
under § 105.23(e);
(5) Providing to an employee upon his
or her request a copy of CHRI upon
which an adverse determination was
predicated; and
(6) Maintaining, for a period of no less
than three years, auditable records
regarding
(i) Maintenance and dissemination of
CHRI; and
(ii) The employer’s certification.
(c) If relevant CHRI is lacking
disposition information, the SIB or
responsible agency in a participating
State will make reasonable efforts to
obtain such information to promote the
accuracy of the record and the integrity
of the application of the relevant
standards. If additional time beyond a
State’s standard response time is needed
to find relevant disposition information,
the SIB or responsible agency may
advise the authorized employer that
additional research is necessary before a
final response can be provided. If raised,
a participating State should take into
account the effect of post-conviction
relief.
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with RULES
§ 105.27
Miscellaneous provisions.
14:18 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Dated: January 5, 2006.
Alberto R. Gonzales,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 06–223 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD–2006–OS–002]
(a) Alternate State availability. (1) An
authorized employer may submit the
employee’s fingerprints to the SIB of a
participating State other than the State
of employment—provided it obtains the
permission of the accommodating
State—if the authorized employer is
prevented from submitting an
employee’s fingerprints because the
employee’s employment is in:
(i) A State that does not have an
applicable Public Law 92–544 statute
authorizing state and national
fingerprint-based criminal history
checks of prospective and current
private security officers and has elected
to opt out; or
(ii) A participating State that has not
yet established a process for receiving
VerDate Aug<31>2005
fingerprints and processing the checks
under the regulations in this subpart.
(2) A participating State agreeing to
process checks under this subsection
will discontinue doing so if thereafter
the State of the employee’s employment
establishes a process State and national
fingerprint-based criminal history
checks of prospective and current
private security officers.
(b) FBI fees for national check. The fee
imposed by the FBI to perform a
fingerprint-based criminal history
record check is that routinely charged
for noncriminal justice fingerprint
submissions as periodically noticed in
the Federal Register.
(c) Penalties for misuse. (1) In
addition to incarceration for a period
not to exceed two years, one who
knowingly and intentionally misuses
information (including a State’s
notification) received pursuant to the
Act may be subject to a fine pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 3571.
(2) Consistent with State law, a
violation of these regulations may also
result in the divestiture of ‘‘authorized
employer’’ status, thereby precluding an
employer which provides security
services from submitting fingerprints for
a State and national criminal history
record check.
(d) Exclusion from coverage.
[Reserved.]
RIN 0720–AA92
TRICARE; Revision of Participating
Providers Reimbursement Rate;
TRICARE Dental Program (TDP)
Department of Defense.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing
this final rule to revise the requirements
and procedures for the reimbursement
of TRICARE Dental program
participating providers. Participating
providers will no longer be reimbursed
at the equivalent of a percentile of
prevailing charges sufficiently above the
50th percentile of prevailing charges
made for similar services in the same
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1695
locality (region) or state, or the
provider’s actual charge, whichever is
lower, less any cost-share amount due
for authorized services. Specifically, the
revision will require TRICARE Dental
Program participating providers to be
reimbursed in accordance with the
contractor’s network agreements, less
any cost-share amount due for
authorized services.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col.
Gary C. Martin, Office of the Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/
TRICARE Management Activity,
telephone (703) 681–0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview of the Rule
This final rule revises the provision
found in 32 CFR 199.13 that requires the
TRICARE Dental Program contractor to
reimburse participating providers at the
equivalent of a percentile of prevailing
charges sufficiently above the 50th
percentile of prevailing charges made
for similar services in the same locality
(region) or state, or the provider’s actual
charge, whichever is lower, less any
cost-share amount due for authorized
services. This provision was included in
the regulation to constitute a significant
financial incentive for participation of
providers in the contractor’s network
and to ensure a network of quality
providers through use of a higher
reimbursement rate. This provision,
however, places an unnecessary
restriction on contractors that already
have established, high quality provider
networks with reimbursement rates
below the 50th percentile that are of
sufficient size to meet the access
requirements of the TRICARE Dental
Program. The reimbursement rates that
have been negotiated over the life of the
dental contract represent the general
market rates for dental insurance
reimbursement, and the final rule brings
DoD reimbursement rates into line with
the broader insurance market.
Elimination of the 50th percentile
requirement affords the Government
and enrollees significant cost savings
through lower provider reimbursement
costs by the contractor. Additionally,
contractors have other methods
available to ensure the TDP members
receive high quality dental services.
These quality assurance methods
include, but are not limited to, licensing
and credentialing standards, patient
satisfaction assessments, and provider
trend analyses.
II. Review of Comments
The proposed rule was published in
the Federal Register on August 31, 2005
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1696
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 7 / Wednesday, January 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(70 FR 51692). We received no public
comments.
PART 199—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 199
continues to read as follows:
I
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 12866 classifies a rule
as significant if it meets any one of a
number of specified conditions,
including: Having an annual effect on
the economy $100 million or more,
adversely affecting a sector of the
economy in a material way, adversely
affecting competition, or adversely
affecting jobs. A regulation is also
considered a significant action if it
raises novel legal or policy issues.
DoD concludes that this final rule is
a significant regulatory action under the
Executive Order since it raises novel
policy issues under section 3(f)(4). DoD
concludes, however, that this final rule
does not meet the significance threshold
of $100 million effect on the economy
in any one year under section 3(f)(1).
The Congressional Review Act
establishes certain procedures for major
rules, defined as those with similar
major impacts. The Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each
Federal agency prepare, and make
available for public comment, a
regulatory flexibility analysis when the
agency issues a regulation that would
have significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This is a not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 801. It is a significant regulatory
action but not economically significant.
This rule has been designated as
significant and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget as
required under the provisions of E.O.
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains a new
information collection requirement that
has been submitted to and approved by
the Office of Management and Budget.
This information collection has been
assigned OMB Control #0720–0035.
rmajette on PROD1PC71 with RULES
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care,
Health insurance, Individuals with
disabilities, Military personnel.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 32 CFR part 199 is amended
as follows.
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:18 Jan 10, 2006
Jkt 208001
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter
55.
2. Section 199.13(g)(2)(ii) is revised to
read as follows:
I
§ 199.13
TRICARE Dental Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Participating providers shall be
reimbursed in accordance with the
contractor’s network agreements, less
any cost-share amount due for
authorized services.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 5, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06–219 Filed 1–10–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–WV–0002; FRL–
8020–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Emission Reductions to Meet
Phase II of the Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
SIP Call
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is granting conditional
approval of a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
West Virginia. This revision establishes
and requires NOX emission reductions
from large, stationary internal
combustion engines in the State to meet
Phase II of the NOX SIP Call. Because
the revision was adopted by West
Virginia under its emergency rules
provisions and has a sunset date, this
approval is conditioned on West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection (WVDEP) adopting a
permanent rule with an effective date
prior to the sunset date of the
emergency rule, and submitting the
permanent rule as a SIP revision to EPA
by July 1, 2006. WVDEP is in the
process of adopting its permanent
version of the rule and has submitted a
written commitment to EPA stating it
will meet all of these conditions. The
intended effect of this action is to grant
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
conditional approval of West Virginia’s
rule to meet its remaining emission
reduction obligations under the NOX
SIP Call.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 10, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–WV–
0002. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 7012
MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston,
West Virginia 25304–2943.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by
e-mail at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 20, 2005 (70 FR 61104),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West
Virginia. The NPR proposed to grant
conditional approval of revisions to
West Virginia emergency rule 45CSR1
titled Control and Reduction of Nitrogen
Oxides from Non-Electric Generating
Units as a Means to Mitigate Transport
of Ozone Precursors. The formal SIP
revision was submitted by WVDEP on
March 31, 2005 (inadvertently noted in
the NPR as being submitted on March
30, 2005).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
West Virginia’s March 31, 2005 SIP
submittal requires large, stationary
internal combustion engines in the State
to reduce NOX emissions by a total of
903 tons for the 2007 ozone season and
beyond, beginning on May 1, 2007.
Sources in West Virginia that are subject
to the new requirements must submit a
compliance plan to WVDEP by May 1,
2006.
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1695-1696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-219]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 199
[DOD-2006-OS-002]
RIN 0720-AA92
TRICARE; Revision of Participating Providers Reimbursement Rate;
TRICARE Dental Program (TDP)
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department is publishing this final rule to revise the
requirements and procedures for the reimbursement of TRICARE Dental
program participating providers. Participating providers will no longer
be reimbursed at the equivalent of a percentile of prevailing charges
sufficiently above the 50th percentile of prevailing charges made for
similar services in the same locality (region) or state, or the
provider's actual charge, whichever is lower, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services. Specifically, the revision will
require TRICARE Dental Program participating providers to be reimbursed
in accordance with the contractor's network agreements, less any cost-
share amount due for authorized services.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 11, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Col. Gary C. Martin, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs)/TRICARE Management
Activity, telephone (703) 681-0039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview of the Rule
This final rule revises the provision found in 32 CFR 199.13 that
requires the TRICARE Dental Program contractor to reimburse
participating providers at the equivalent of a percentile of prevailing
charges sufficiently above the 50th percentile of prevailing charges
made for similar services in the same locality (region) or state, or
the provider's actual charge, whichever is lower, less any cost-share
amount due for authorized services. This provision was included in the
regulation to constitute a significant financial incentive for
participation of providers in the contractor's network and to ensure a
network of quality providers through use of a higher reimbursement
rate. This provision, however, places an unnecessary restriction on
contractors that already have established, high quality provider
networks with reimbursement rates below the 50th percentile that are of
sufficient size to meet the access requirements of the TRICARE Dental
Program. The reimbursement rates that have been negotiated over the
life of the dental contract represent the general market rates for
dental insurance reimbursement, and the final rule brings DoD
reimbursement rates into line with the broader insurance market.
Elimination of the 50th percentile requirement affords the Government
and enrollees significant cost savings through lower provider
reimbursement costs by the contractor. Additionally, contractors have
other methods available to ensure the TDP members receive high quality
dental services. These quality assurance methods include, but are not
limited to, licensing and credentialing standards, patient satisfaction
assessments, and provider trend analyses.
II. Review of Comments
The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on August
31, 2005
[[Page 1696]]
(70 FR 51692). We received no public comments.
III. Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary,
to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 12866
classifies a rule as significant if it meets any one of a number of
specified conditions, including: Having an annual effect on the economy
$100 million or more, adversely affecting a sector of the economy in a
material way, adversely affecting competition, or adversely affecting
jobs. A regulation is also considered a significant action if it raises
novel legal or policy issues.
DoD concludes that this final rule is a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order since it raises novel policy issues
under section 3(f)(4). DoD concludes, however, that this final rule
does not meet the significance threshold of $100 million effect on the
economy in any one year under section 3(f)(1).
The Congressional Review Act establishes certain procedures for
major rules, defined as those with similar major impacts. The
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each Federal agency
prepare, and make available for public comment, a regulatory
flexibility analysis when the agency issues a regulation that would
have significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This is a not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 801. It is a significant
regulatory action but not economically significant. This rule has been
designated as significant and has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget as required under the provisions of E.O. 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains a new information collection requirement
that has been submitted to and approved by the Office of Management and
Budget. This information collection has been assigned OMB Control
0720-0035.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 199
Claims, Dental health, Health care, Health insurance, Individuals
with disabilities, Military personnel.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 32 CFR part 199 is amended as
follows.
PART 199--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 199 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 10 U.S.C. chapter 55.
0
2. Section 199.13(g)(2)(ii) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 199.13 TRICARE Dental Program.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Participating providers shall be reimbursed in accordance with
the contractor's network agreements, less any cost-share amount due for
authorized services.
* * * * *
Dated: January 5, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-219 Filed 1-10-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M