Notice of Intent To Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the National Science Foundation To Address Potential Impacts on the Marine Environment Related to the United States Implementing Organization's Participation in the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program, 1560-1563 [06-198]
Download as PDF
1560
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
II. Desired Focus of Comments
Currently, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is soliciting
comments concerning the proposed
extension of the information collection
requirement related to Roof Control
Plans. MSHA is particularly interested
in comments that:
* Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of MSHA’s
functions, including whether the
information has practical utility;
* Evaluate the accuracy of MSHA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
* Suggest methods to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
* Address the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, (e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses) to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond.
A copy of the proposed information
collection request can be obtained by
contacting the employee listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice or
viewed on the Internet by accessing the
MSHA home page (https://
www.msha.gov) and then choosing
‘‘Compliance Assistance’’, ‘‘Compliance
Information’’ and the ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act Submissions.’’
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Falls of roof, face and rib continue to
be a cause of injuries and death in
underground coal mines. All
underground coal mine operators are
required to develop and submit roof
control plans to MSHA for evaluation
and approval. These plans provide the
means to instruct miners, who install
roof supports, and the minimum
requirements and placement of roof
supports. The plan also provides a
reference for mine supervisors to assist
them in compliance with the plan
requirements. In that regard the plan is
a working document for the miners.
Type of Review: Extension.
Agency: Mine Safety and Health
Administration.
Title: Roof Control Plan.
OMB Number: 1219–0004.
Recordkeeping: Indefinite.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Total Number of Responses: 2,465.
Total Burden Hours: 6,919.
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Dated: January 3, 2006.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 06–243 Filed 1–6–06; 1:28 pm]
Dated at Arlington, Virginia, this 3rd day
of January, 2006.
David L. Meyer,
Director, Office of Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. E6–97 Filed 1–9–06; 8:45 am]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for the National Science
Foundation To Address Potential
Impacts on the Marine Environment
Related to the United States
Implementing Organization’s
Participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program
BILLING CODE 4510–43–P
Jkt 208001
BILLING CODE 6820–MA–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
National Science Foundation.
Notice.
NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY
(NCD)
AGENCY:
Sunshine Act Meetings
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces its intent
to prepare a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
to evaluate the potential environmental
impacts associated with the NSF
funding of the United States
Implementing Organization’s (USIO)
participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program (IODP). This EIS is
being prepared and considered in
accordance with requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, regulations of the
President’s Council on Environmental
Quality (40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508), and NSF’s National
Environmental Policy Act Implementing
Procedures (45 CFR 640.1–640.5). The
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), a part of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), is being invited to be a
cooperating agency in the preparation of
the Programmatic EIS.
Publication of this notice begins the
official scoping process that will help
identify alternatives and determine the
scope of environmental issues to be
addressed in the Programmatic EIS/
OEIS. This notice requests public
participation in the scoping process and
provides information on how to
participate.
Type: Quarterly Meeting
(Teleconference).
January 30–31, 2006,
Noon–2 p.m. EST.
DATES AND TIMES:
LOCATION: National Council on
Disability, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite
850, Washington, DC.
This meeting (teleconference)
will be open to the public.
STATUS:
Reports from the Chairperson
and the Executive Director, Team
Reports, Unfinished Business, New
Business, Announcements,
Adjournment.
AGENDA:
Mark S.
Quigley, Director of Communications,
NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850,
Washington, DC 20004; 202–272–2004
(voice), 202–272–2074 (TTY), 202–272–
2022 (fax), mquigley@ncd.gov (e-mail).
SUNSHINE ACT MEETING CONTACT:
II. Current Actions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintaining): $4,630.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
AGENCY MISSION: NCD is an independent
Federal agency making
recommendations to the President and
Congress to enhance the quality of life
for all Americans with disabilities and
their families. NCD is composed of 15
members appointed by the President
and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Those needing
reasonable accommodations should
notify NCD at least two weeks before
this meeting (teleconference).
ACCOMMODATIONS:
In accordance
with E.O. 13166, Improving Access to
Services for Persons with Limited
English Proficiency, those people with
disabilities who are limited English
proficient and seek translation services
for these meetings should notify NCD at
least two weeks before this meeting.
LANGUAGE TRANSLATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Addresses and Dates
The public scoping period starts with
the publication of this Notice in the
Federal Register and will continue until
March 6, 2006. NSF will consider all
comments received or postmarked by
that date in defining the scope of this
EIS. Comments received or postmarked
after that date will be considered to the
extent practicable. Public scoping
meetings will provide the public with
an opportunity to present comments,
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
ask questions, and discuss concerns
regarding the EIS with NSF officials.
The locations, dates, and times for the
public scoping meetings are as follows:
1. Wednesday, February 15, 5–9 p.m.,
100 Vaughn Hall, Discovery Way,
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La
Jolla, CA;
2. Friday, February 17, 2006, 5–9
p.m., Room C126, 1000 Discovery Drive,
Texas A&M University, College Station,
TX; and
3. Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:30–
6:30 p.m., Silver Spring Metro Center
Building 4, Science Center, 1301 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD.
Written comments will be accepted at
these meetings as well as during the
scoping period, and can be mailed to
NSF by March 6, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written statements and questions
regarding the scoping process should be
mailed to Dr. James Allan, Program
Director, Ocean Drilling Program,
Division of Ocean Sciences, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 725, Arlington, VA
22230; voice (703) 292–8581 or e-mail at
jallan@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1975,
the National Science Foundation (NSF)
prepared an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) on the International
Phase of Ocean Drilling (IPOD) of the
Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP). The
1975 EIS addressed scientific ocean
drilling carried out globally in major
and minor ocean basins.
In 1985, the NSF prepared an EIS for
the new Ocean Drilling Program (ODP)
to address the more complicated aspects
of proposed drilling techniques and of
drilling in high latitudes and Antarctic
seas that were not previously addressed
in the DSDP/IPOD EIS. Drilling modes
that were analyzed in the DSDP/IPOD
EIS were reviewed in the 1985 EIS
including the use of the research vessel
(RV) JOIDES Resolution. Additionally,
aspects of drilling in deep-ocean
trenches, on active spreading centers,
and in or near environmentally sensitive
regions were considered in the 1985
environmental review. Drilling in both
DSDP/IPOD and ODP was riserless,
where drill cuttings were typically
removed from the borehole by pumped
seawater without return circulation to
the drillship via an external pipe or
riser.
The ODP was formally completed
September 30, 2003. In order to
facilitate the seamless continuation of
research during the transition from the
ODP to the Integrated Ocean Drilling
Program (IODP), the JOIDES Resolution
was selected as the platform to continue
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
to conduct riserless drilling activities
during Phase 1 of the USIO
participation in the IODP.
Environmental Assessments (EAs) were
prepared in 2004 and 2005 to
supplement the 1985 EIS and address
the environmental and operating
conditions that were specific to the
IODP–USIO Phase 1 expeditions that
would be performed during 2004 and
2005.
The IODP is an international research
program that explores the history and
structure of the earth as recorded in
seafloor sediments, fluids, and rocks.
IODP builds upon the earlier successes
of the DSDP and the ODP, which
revolutionized our view of Earth history
and global processes through ocean
basin exploration. IODP represents the
latest generation of these highly
successful scientific ocean-drilling
initiatives and seeks to greatly expand
the reach of these previous programs by
forming a collaborative union between
the United States, Japan, and the
European Union, each of whom will be
responsible for providing drilling
platforms appropriate for achieving the
scientific objectives outlines in the
IODP Initial Science Plan. China has
joined as an additional member. Based
on international agreements, the United
States is responsible for providing and
operating a riserless drilling vessel,
Japan will provide and operate a riser
drilling vessel, and a European-led
consortium will provide and operate
Mission Specific Platforms capable of
drilling in environments unsuitable for
either the riserless or riser vessels.
Joint Oceanographic Institutions,
Incorporated (JOI) and its partners, the
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of
Columbia University (LDEO) and Texas
A&M University (TAMU) through the
Texas A&M Research Foundation
(TAMRF), have been selected by NSF to
be the IODP USIO for the riserless vessel
and related activities. These three
partners comprise the JOI Alliance. JOI
is responsible to NSF for the overall
program leadership, technical,
operational, and financial management,
and delivery of services. TAMU is
responsible for providing a full array of
science services, ranging from vessel
and drilling operations to ship- and
shore-based science laboratories, core
repositories, and publication. LDEO is
responsible for logging-related
shipboard and shore-based science
services and for leading an international
logging consortium to participate in
scientific ocean drilling operations. The
objectives of the USIO are to provide
leadership regarding the U.S. interests
in IODP as the challenges and demands
of a multiplatform drilling program
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1561
present themselves. The USIO also
seeks to ensure that services for the
riserless vessel and other program
aspects are provided in a cost-effective,
holistic, and responsive manner to
facilitate comprehensive, integrated,
and flexible management that involves a
broad array of stakeholders.
Currently, the JOI Alliance is
completing IODP Phase 1 operations
using the RV JOIDES Resolution, which
is the same vessel used for two decades
during ODP (1985–2003). Concurrent
with Phase 1 activities (2003–2006), the
JOI Alliance is planning for Phase 2
operations, which require procuring and
converting an appropriate ship into a
Scientific Ocean Drilling Vessel (SODV).
This Programmatic EIS will address the
use of the SODV and the USIO’s
participation in IODP Phase 2 riserless
drilling operations for at least the next
20 years.
Depending upon the specific research
objectives of each IODP USIO Phase 2
expedition, typical aspects of the
proposed action that have the potential
to affect the surrounding environment
and will be subject to review in the
proposed Programmatic EIS include:
Site Selection and Expedition Planning
• Review and evaluate research
proposals (multi-phase, international
process).
• Logistically prepare for expedition
and schedule.
Vessel Deployment and Maximum Days
at Sea per Expedition
• Transit from port call to expedition
site; may require days or weeks of travel
at a nominal speed of 10 knots
(depending on sea conditions).
• Remain at sea for 60 days.
Number of Drill Sites and Boreholes
• One or more drill sites may be
selected in a specific area for each
expedition as needed to meet research
objectives.
• One or more boreholes may be
advanced at each drill site as needed to
meet specific objectives.
Typical Extent of Operations
• Water Depth (m) 75–7,000.
• Seafloor Penetration (m) 1–2,500.
Drilling and Casing Deployment
• Depending upon the specific
application, drill bits will be advanced
into the seafloor to produce nominallysized boreholdes 37.5, 44.5, 50.8, or 61
cm (145⁄8, 173⁄8, 20, 24 in) in diameter
(alternate sized boreholes may be drilled
as needed).
• Depending on the specific
application, boreholes may be lined
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1562
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
• Water Sampling Temperature Probe
(WSTP).
with 27.3, 34, 40, and 50.8 cm (105⁄8,
133⁄8, 16, 20 in) casings (alternate size
casting may be installed as needed).
Core Sampling
• Advanced Piston Corer (APC): used
in soft ooze and sediments.
• Rotary Core Barrel (RCB): used in
medium to hard crystalline sediments.
• Sonic Core Monitor (SCM).
• Extended Core Barrel (XCB): used
in firm sediments.
• Advanced Diamond Core Barrel
(ADCB): used in hard sedimentary or
igneous formations.
• Motor Driven Core Barrel (MDCB):
Used in interbedded materials and hard
fractured rock.
• Pressure Core Sample (PCS): used
in sediments while maintaining in situ
pressure.
• Botton-Hole Assembly (BHA).
• Tricone Retractable Bit (TRB).
• Other coring and sampling
capability as developed.
Deployment of Reentry Hardware and
Observatories
• Drill-In-Casing (DIC) System: used
to drill in a short casing string
simultaneously with the bit to support
an unstable sediment zone.
• Free Fall Funnel (FFF): used to
reenter a hole.
• Hard Rock Base (HRB): Used to
focus the direction of the drill bit into
hard irregular seafloor surfaces.
• Hard Rock Reentry System (HRRS):
used to install casing with reentry
capability on a sloping or rough hard
rock seafloor.
• Reentry Cone and Casing (RECC):
used as a permanent seafloor
installation (or legacy hole) able to
support nested casing strings.
• Database query of sites with reentry
cones.
• Underreamers, Bi-Center Reamers,
and Mud Motors.
• Vibration Isolated Television Frame
(VIT).
• Circulation Obviation Retrofit Kit
(CORK) Borehole Observatory.
• Advanced CORK (ACORK)
Borehole Observatory.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
In Situ Sampling and Testing
• Temperature, pore pressure, gas and
fluid compositions, permeability,
microbial with instruments such as:
• Advanced Piston Corer
Temperature (APCT), used to obtain
formation temperatures to determine the
heat flow gradient.
• Davis-Villinger Temperature Probe
(DVTP), used to take heat-flow
measurements in semi consolidated
sediments that are too stiff for the
APCT.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
Downhole Logging
• Natural gamma ray measurement.
• Compressional- and shear-wave
sonic velocity (Vp and Vs).
• Caliper to measure borehole
rugosity.
• Formation density, porosity,
temperature, resistivity and resistivity
images, magnetic susceptibility/
reversals.
• Borehole camera.
• Borehole seismic tool for check
shots or vertical seismic profiles (VSP).
• Fluid sampling.
• Measurement while Drilling
(MWD), including Logging While
Drilling (LWD, formation resistivity
images and density/porosity).
• Geochemical logging (inference of
formation chemical composition).
Geophysical Surveying
• Occasional use of geophysical
techniques to characterize seafloor.
The Programmatic EIS will address
U.S. laws and regulations, as
appropriate, including but not
necessarily limited to NEPA; the Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972
(MMPA); the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (ESA); and Executive Order (EO)
12114 (1979), Environmental Effects
Abroad of Major Federal Actions. In
addition, the assessment will address
foreign regulations especially where
research will be carried out entirely or
partially within territorial waters or
Exclusive Economic Zone waters
surrounding a foreign nation or in
international waters subject to the
United Nations Law of the Sea or other
international agreements.
The Programmatic EIS will take a
view of the planned USIO drilling
program as a whole and thereby
assemble and analyze the broadest range
of direct, indirect, and cumulative
impacts associated with the entire
program rather than assessing
individual cruises separately. This
approach will also address possible
concerns that NSF is analyzing
regarding each expedition’s contribution
to the cumulative impacts of the entire
program. Further, the Programmatic EIS
will provide a broad analytical baseline
within which NSF, using tiered
documents, will be able to analyze and
decide upon various cruise-specific
issues. This process will enable the NSF
to streamline the preparation of
subsequent environmental documents
for the individual cruises, if needed,
and enable NSF to identify any prudent
conservation practices and mitigation
measures that may be applied across the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
entire program. The application of the
Programmatic EIS to future cruises will
be determined during the development
of the EIS and will be specified within
the EIS.
Major environmental issues that will
be addressed in the Programmatic EIS
include marine biological resources
including Essential Fish Habitat (EFH),
acoustic impacts to marine mammals,
fish, sea turtles, invertebrates, and
threatened and endangered species;
releases of any substances from the ship
during vessel transit, drilling, and
research operations; cultural resources;
human health and safety;
socioeconomic and land use (i.e.,
commercial, private, and recreational
uses of the marine environment); and
water quality.
At present, NSF has identified two
alternatives for evaluation in the EIS: (1)
The proposed action as described above;
and (2) the no action alternative. NSF
welcomes discussion on these and other
possible alternatives that may be
identified during the scoping process.
NSF also welcomes discussion on
mitigation measures to be considered,
separate from features of the proposed
action that could avoid or substantially
reduce the environmental consequences
of the proposed action.
NSF is initiating this scoping process
for the purpose of determining the
extent of issues to be addressed,
identifying the significant issues related
to this action, and identifying possible
alternatives to the proposed action. NSF
will hold public scoping meetings as
identified in the Dates and Addresses
section of this notice. These meetings
will also be advertised in area
newspapers. NSF and NMFS
representatives will be available at these
meetings to receive comments from the
public regarding issues of concern to the
public. Federal, state, and local agencies
and interested individuals are
encouraged to take this opportunity to
identify environmental concerns that
should be addressed during the
preparation of the Programmatic EIS.
Agencies and the public are also invited
and encouraged to provide written
comments on scoping issues in addition
to, or in lieu of, oral comments at the
public meeting. To be most helpful,
scoping comments should clearly
describe issues or topics that the
commenter believes the Programmatic
EIS should address.
We invite you to learn about NSF’s
funding of the USIO’s role in the
Integrated Ocean Drilling Program at an
informational open house, and to assist
NSF in defining the alternatives and the
scoping environmental issues related to
the drilling research program. All our
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2006 / Notices
public meeting locations are
wheelchair-accessible. If you plan to
attend a scoping meeting/open house,
and need special assistance such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodation, please
notify NSF (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 3
business days in advance. Include your
contact information as well as
information about your specific needs.
We request public comments or other
relevant information on environmental
issues related to the NSF drilling
program. The public meetings are not
the only opportunity you have to
comment. In addition to or in place of
attending a meeting, you can submit
comments to Dr. James Allan by March
6, 2006 (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). We will consider all
comments received during the comment
period. We request that you include in
your comments:
• Your name and address (especially
if you would like to receive a copy of
the Draft Programmatic EIS/OEIS upon
completion);
• An explanation for each comment;
and
• Include any background materials
to support your comments, as you feel
necessary.
You may mail, e-mail, or hand deliver
your comments to NSF (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). All comment
submissions must be unbound, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, and suitable for
copying and elctronic scanning. Please
note that regardless of the method used
for submitting comments or material, all
submissions will be publicly available
and, therefore, any personal information
you provide in your comments will be
open for public review. In addition, if
you wish to receive a copy of the Draft
Programmatic EIS/OEIS, please indicate
this in your comment. No decision will
be made to implement any alternative
until the NEPA prcoess is completed.
Dated: January 5, 2006.
James Allan,
Program Director, Ocean Drilling Program,
Division of Ocean Sciences, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06–198 Filed 1–9–06; 8:45 am]
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards; Joint Meeting of the
Subcommittees on Regulatory Policies
and Practices and on ThermalHydraulic Phenomena; Notice of
Meeting
The ACRS Subcommittees on
Regulatory Policies and Practices and on
Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena will
hold a joint meeting on January 25,
2006, Room T–2B3, 11545 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
The entire meeting will be open to
public attendance.
The agenda for the subject meeting
shall be as follows:
Wednesday, January 25, 2006—1:30
p.m. until 5:30 p.m.
The Subcommittees will review the
staff’s draft proposed Regulatory Guide
in support of risk-informed changes to
loss-of-coolant accident technical
requirements. The Subcommittees will
hear presentations by and hold
discussions with representatives of the
NRC staff, and other interested persons
regarding this matter. The
Subcommittee will gather information,
analyze relevant issues and facts, and
formulate proposed positions and
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation
by the full Committee.
Members of the public desiring to
provide oral statements and/or written
comments should notify the Designated
Federal Official, Mr. Michael R.
Snodderly (telephone 301/415–6927),
five days prior to the meeting, if
possible, so that appropriate
arrangements can be made. Electronic
recordings will be permitted.
Further information regarding this
meeting can be obtained by contacting
the Designated Federal Official between
7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons
planning to attend this meeting are
urged to contact the above named
individual at least two working days
prior to the meeting to be advised of any
potential changes to the agenda.
Dated: January 4, 2006.
Michael L. Scott,
Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. E6–122 Filed 1–9–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Federal Register Notice
Weeks of January 9, 16, 23, 30,
February 6, 13, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:45 Jan 09, 2006
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
PLACE:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
DATES:
1563
Week of January 9, 2006
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Briefing on International
Research and Bilateral Agreements
(Public Meeting). (Contact: Roman
Shaffer, 301–415–7606). This meeting
will be webcast live at the Web
address—https://www.nrc.gov
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
1:55 p.m.: Affirmation Session (Public
Meeting) (Tentative) a. Hydro
Resources, Inc. (Crownpoint, New
Mexico) Petition for Review of LBP–
05–17 (Groundwater Issues)
(Tentative)
2 p.m.: Meeting with Advisory
Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW)
(Public Meeting) (Contact: John
Larkins, 301–415–7360) This meeting
will be webcast live at the Web
address—https://www.nrc.gov
Thursday, January 12, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Discussion of Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 2 & 3).
Week of January 16, 2006—Tentative
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
1:30 p.m.: Discussion of Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 1 & 3).
Week of January 23, 2006—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for the
Week of January 23, 2006.
Week of January 30, 2006—Tentative
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Briefing on Strategic
Workforce Planning and Human
Capital Initiatives (Closed—Ex. 2).
Wednesday, February 1, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Discussion of Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 1 & 3)
Week of February 6, 2006—Tentative
Monday, February 6, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Briefing on Materials
Degradation Issues and Fuel
Reliability (Public Meeting). (Contact:
Jennifer Uhle, 301–415–6200). This
meeting will be webcast live at the
Web address— https://www.nrc.gov
2 p.m.: Discussion of Security Issues
(Closed—Ex. 1 & 3).
Wednesday, February 8, 2006
9:30 a.m.: Briefing on Office of Nuclear
Materials Safety and Safeguards
(NMSS). Programs, Performance, and
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1560-1563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-198]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for the National Science Foundation To Address Potential
Impacts on the Marine Environment Related to the United States
Implementing Organization's Participation in the Integrated Ocean
Drilling Program
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to
prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate
the potential environmental impacts associated with the NSF funding of
the United States Implementing Organization's (USIO) participation in
the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP). This EIS is being
prepared and considered in accordance with requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, regulations of the President's
Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508), and
NSF's National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures (45 CFR
640.1-640.5). The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), a part of
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), is being
invited to be a cooperating agency in the preparation of the
Programmatic EIS.
Publication of this notice begins the official scoping process that
will help identify alternatives and determine the scope of
environmental issues to be addressed in the Programmatic EIS/OEIS. This
notice requests public participation in the scoping process and
provides information on how to participate.
Addresses and Dates
The public scoping period starts with the publication of this
Notice in the Federal Register and will continue until March 6, 2006.
NSF will consider all comments received or postmarked by that date in
defining the scope of this EIS. Comments received or postmarked after
that date will be considered to the extent practicable. Public scoping
meetings will provide the public with an opportunity to present
comments,
[[Page 1561]]
ask questions, and discuss concerns regarding the EIS with NSF
officials. The locations, dates, and times for the public scoping
meetings are as follows:
1. Wednesday, February 15, 5-9 p.m., 100 Vaughn Hall, Discovery
Way, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA;
2. Friday, February 17, 2006, 5-9 p.m., Room C126, 1000 Discovery
Drive, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX; and
3. Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:30-6:30 p.m., Silver Spring Metro
Center Building 4, Science Center, 1301 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD.
Written comments will be accepted at these meetings as well as
during the scoping period, and can be mailed to NSF by March 6, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written statements and questions
regarding the scoping process should be mailed to Dr. James Allan,
Program Director, Ocean Drilling Program, Division of Ocean Sciences,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 725,
Arlington, VA 22230; voice (703) 292-8581 or e-mail at jallan@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1975, the National Science Foundation
(NSF) prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the
International Phase of Ocean Drilling (IPOD) of the Deep Sea Drilling
Project (DSDP). The 1975 EIS addressed scientific ocean drilling
carried out globally in major and minor ocean basins.
In 1985, the NSF prepared an EIS for the new Ocean Drilling Program
(ODP) to address the more complicated aspects of proposed drilling
techniques and of drilling in high latitudes and Antarctic seas that
were not previously addressed in the DSDP/IPOD EIS. Drilling modes that
were analyzed in the DSDP/IPOD EIS were reviewed in the 1985 EIS
including the use of the research vessel (RV) JOIDES Resolution.
Additionally, aspects of drilling in deep-ocean trenches, on active
spreading centers, and in or near environmentally sensitive regions
were considered in the 1985 environmental review. Drilling in both
DSDP/IPOD and ODP was riserless, where drill cuttings were typically
removed from the borehole by pumped seawater without return circulation
to the drillship via an external pipe or riser.
The ODP was formally completed September 30, 2003. In order to
facilitate the seamless continuation of research during the transition
from the ODP to the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP), the
JOIDES Resolution was selected as the platform to continue to conduct
riserless drilling activities during Phase 1 of the USIO participation
in the IODP. Environmental Assessments (EAs) were prepared in 2004 and
2005 to supplement the 1985 EIS and address the environmental and
operating conditions that were specific to the IODP-USIO Phase 1
expeditions that would be performed during 2004 and 2005.
The IODP is an international research program that explores the
history and structure of the earth as recorded in seafloor sediments,
fluids, and rocks. IODP builds upon the earlier successes of the DSDP
and the ODP, which revolutionized our view of Earth history and global
processes through ocean basin exploration. IODP represents the latest
generation of these highly successful scientific ocean-drilling
initiatives and seeks to greatly expand the reach of these previous
programs by forming a collaborative union between the United States,
Japan, and the European Union, each of whom will be responsible for
providing drilling platforms appropriate for achieving the scientific
objectives outlines in the IODP Initial Science Plan. China has joined
as an additional member. Based on international agreements, the United
States is responsible for providing and operating a riserless drilling
vessel, Japan will provide and operate a riser drilling vessel, and a
European-led consortium will provide and operate Mission Specific
Platforms capable of drilling in environments unsuitable for either the
riserless or riser vessels.
Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Incorporated (JOI) and its
partners, the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University
(LDEO) and Texas A&M University (TAMU) through the Texas A&M Research
Foundation (TAMRF), have been selected by NSF to be the IODP USIO for
the riserless vessel and related activities. These three partners
comprise the JOI Alliance. JOI is responsible to NSF for the overall
program leadership, technical, operational, and financial management,
and delivery of services. TAMU is responsible for providing a full
array of science services, ranging from vessel and drilling operations
to ship- and shore-based science laboratories, core repositories, and
publication. LDEO is responsible for logging-related shipboard and
shore-based science services and for leading an international logging
consortium to participate in scientific ocean drilling operations. The
objectives of the USIO are to provide leadership regarding the U.S.
interests in IODP as the challenges and demands of a multiplatform
drilling program present themselves. The USIO also seeks to ensure that
services for the riserless vessel and other program aspects are
provided in a cost-effective, holistic, and responsive manner to
facilitate comprehensive, integrated, and flexible management that
involves a broad array of stakeholders.
Currently, the JOI Alliance is completing IODP Phase 1 operations
using the RV JOIDES Resolution, which is the same vessel used for two
decades during ODP (1985-2003). Concurrent with Phase 1 activities
(2003-2006), the JOI Alliance is planning for Phase 2 operations, which
require procuring and converting an appropriate ship into a Scientific
Ocean Drilling Vessel (SODV). This Programmatic EIS will address the
use of the SODV and the USIO's participation in IODP Phase 2 riserless
drilling operations for at least the next 20 years.
Depending upon the specific research objectives of each IODP USIO
Phase 2 expedition, typical aspects of the proposed action that have
the potential to affect the surrounding environment and will be subject
to review in the proposed Programmatic EIS include:
Site Selection and Expedition Planning
Review and evaluate research proposals (multi-phase,
international process).
Logistically prepare for expedition and schedule.
Vessel Deployment and Maximum Days at Sea per Expedition
Transit from port call to expedition site; may require
days or weeks of travel at a nominal speed of 10 knots (depending on
sea conditions).
Remain at sea for 60 days.
Number of Drill Sites and Boreholes
One or more drill sites may be selected in a specific area
for each expedition as needed to meet research objectives.
One or more boreholes may be advanced at each drill site
as needed to meet specific objectives.
Typical Extent of Operations
Water Depth (m) 75-7,000.
Seafloor Penetration (m) 1-2,500.
Drilling and Casing Deployment
Depending upon the specific application, drill bits will
be advanced into the seafloor to produce nominally-sized boreholdes
37.5, 44.5, 50.8, or 61 cm (14\5/8\, 17\3/8\, 20, 24 in) in diameter
(alternate sized boreholes may be drilled as needed).
Depending on the specific application, boreholes may be
lined
[[Page 1562]]
with 27.3, 34, 40, and 50.8 cm (10\5/8\, 13\3/8\, 16, 20 in) casings
(alternate size casting may be installed as needed).
Core Sampling
Advanced Piston Corer (APC): used in soft ooze and
sediments.
Rotary Core Barrel (RCB): used in medium to hard
crystalline sediments.
Sonic Core Monitor (SCM).
Extended Core Barrel (XCB): used in firm sediments.
Advanced Diamond Core Barrel (ADCB): used in hard
sedimentary or igneous formations.
Motor Driven Core Barrel (MDCB): Used in interbedded
materials and hard fractured rock.
Pressure Core Sample (PCS): used in sediments while
maintaining in situ pressure.
Botton-Hole Assembly (BHA).
Tricone Retractable Bit (TRB).
Other coring and sampling capability as developed.
Deployment of Reentry Hardware and Observatories
Drill-In-Casing (DIC) System: used to drill in a short
casing string simultaneously with the bit to support an unstable
sediment zone.
Free Fall Funnel (FFF): used to reenter a hole.
Hard Rock Base (HRB): Used to focus the direction of the
drill bit into hard irregular seafloor surfaces.
Hard Rock Reentry System (HRRS): used to install casing
with reentry capability on a sloping or rough hard rock seafloor.
Reentry Cone and Casing (RECC): used as a permanent
seafloor installation (or legacy hole) able to support nested casing
strings.
Database query of sites with reentry cones.
Underreamers, Bi-Center Reamers, and Mud Motors.
Vibration Isolated Television Frame (VIT).
Circulation Obviation Retrofit Kit (CORK) Borehole
Observatory.
Advanced CORK (ACORK) Borehole Observatory.
In Situ Sampling and Testing
Temperature, pore pressure, gas and fluid compositions,
permeability, microbial with instruments such as:
Advanced Piston Corer Temperature (APCT), used to obtain
formation temperatures to determine the heat flow gradient.
Davis-Villinger Temperature Probe (DVTP), used to take
heat-flow measurements in semi consolidated sediments that are too
stiff for the APCT.
Water Sampling Temperature Probe (WSTP).
Downhole Logging
Natural gamma ray measurement.
Compressional- and shear-wave sonic velocity (Vp and Vs).
Caliper to measure borehole rugosity.
Formation density, porosity, temperature, resistivity and
resistivity images, magnetic susceptibility/reversals.
Borehole camera.
Borehole seismic tool for check shots or vertical seismic
profiles (VSP).
Fluid sampling.
Measurement while Drilling (MWD), including Logging While
Drilling (LWD, formation resistivity images and density/porosity).
Geochemical logging (inference of formation chemical
composition).
Geophysical Surveying
Occasional use of geophysical techniques to characterize
seafloor.
The Programmatic EIS will address U.S. laws and regulations, as
appropriate, including but not necessarily limited to NEPA; the Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (MMPA); the Endangered Species Act of
1973 (ESA); and Executive Order (EO) 12114 (1979), Environmental
Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions. In addition, the assessment
will address foreign regulations especially where research will be
carried out entirely or partially within territorial waters or
Exclusive Economic Zone waters surrounding a foreign nation or in
international waters subject to the United Nations Law of the Sea or
other international agreements.
The Programmatic EIS will take a view of the planned USIO drilling
program as a whole and thereby assemble and analyze the broadest range
of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts associated with the entire
program rather than assessing individual cruises separately. This
approach will also address possible concerns that NSF is analyzing
regarding each expedition's contribution to the cumulative impacts of
the entire program. Further, the Programmatic EIS will provide a broad
analytical baseline within which NSF, using tiered documents, will be
able to analyze and decide upon various cruise-specific issues. This
process will enable the NSF to streamline the preparation of subsequent
environmental documents for the individual cruises, if needed, and
enable NSF to identify any prudent conservation practices and
mitigation measures that may be applied across the entire program. The
application of the Programmatic EIS to future cruises will be
determined during the development of the EIS and will be specified
within the EIS.
Major environmental issues that will be addressed in the
Programmatic EIS include marine biological resources including
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), acoustic impacts to marine mammals, fish,
sea turtles, invertebrates, and threatened and endangered species;
releases of any substances from the ship during vessel transit,
drilling, and research operations; cultural resources; human health and
safety; socioeconomic and land use (i.e., commercial, private, and
recreational uses of the marine environment); and water quality.
At present, NSF has identified two alternatives for evaluation in
the EIS: (1) The proposed action as described above; and (2) the no
action alternative. NSF welcomes discussion on these and other possible
alternatives that may be identified during the scoping process. NSF
also welcomes discussion on mitigation measures to be considered,
separate from features of the proposed action that could avoid or
substantially reduce the environmental consequences of the proposed
action.
NSF is initiating this scoping process for the purpose of
determining the extent of issues to be addressed, identifying the
significant issues related to this action, and identifying possible
alternatives to the proposed action. NSF will hold public scoping
meetings as identified in the Dates and Addresses section of this
notice. These meetings will also be advertised in area newspapers. NSF
and NMFS representatives will be available at these meetings to receive
comments from the public regarding issues of concern to the public.
Federal, state, and local agencies and interested individuals are
encouraged to take this opportunity to identify environmental concerns
that should be addressed during the preparation of the Programmatic
EIS. Agencies and the public are also invited and encouraged to provide
written comments on scoping issues in addition to, or in lieu of, oral
comments at the public meeting. To be most helpful, scoping comments
should clearly describe issues or topics that the commenter believes
the Programmatic EIS should address.
We invite you to learn about NSF's funding of the USIO's role in
the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program at an informational open house,
and to assist NSF in defining the alternatives and the scoping
environmental issues related to the drilling research program. All our
[[Page 1563]]
public meeting locations are wheelchair-accessible. If you plan to
attend a scoping meeting/open house, and need special assistance such
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodation,
please notify NSF (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 3
business days in advance. Include your contact information as well as
information about your specific needs.
We request public comments or other relevant information on
environmental issues related to the NSF drilling program. The public
meetings are not the only opportunity you have to comment. In addition
to or in place of attending a meeting, you can submit comments to Dr.
James Allan by March 6, 2006 (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). We
will consider all comments received during the comment period. We
request that you include in your comments:
Your name and address (especially if you would like to
receive a copy of the Draft Programmatic EIS/OEIS upon completion);
An explanation for each comment; and
Include any background materials to support your comments,
as you feel necessary.
You may mail, e-mail, or hand deliver your comments to NSF (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). All comment submissions must be unbound,
no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, and suitable for copying and
elctronic scanning. Please note that regardless of the method used for
submitting comments or material, all submissions will be publicly
available and, therefore, any personal information you provide in your
comments will be open for public review. In addition, if you wish to
receive a copy of the Draft Programmatic EIS/OEIS, please indicate this
in your comment. No decision will be made to implement any alternative
until the NEPA prcoess is completed.
Dated: January 5, 2006.
James Allan,
Program Director, Ocean Drilling Program, Division of Ocean Sciences,
National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 06-198 Filed 1-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M