Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 928 [E6-25]

Download as PDF 928 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices and acceptability status of chemicals in inert mixtures; 4. Maintain existing files of all inert ingredient mixture compositional data submitted to the Agency; 5. Receive new compositional information from suppliers; 6. Scan an image pesticide inert ingredient master file submission documents into an image database. This contract involves no subcontractors. The OPP has determined that the contracts described in this document involve work that is being conducted in connection with FIFRA, in that pesticide chemicals will be the subject of certain evaluations to be made under this contract. These evaluations may be used in subsequent regulatory decisions under FIFRA. Some of this information may be entitled to confidential treatment. The information has been submitted to EPA under sections 3, 4, 6, and 7 of FIFRA and under sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. In accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 2.307(h)(3), the contracts with Lockheed Martin, prohibits use of the information for any purpose not specified in these contracts; prohibits disclosure of the information to a third party without prior written approval from the Agency; and requires that each official and employee of the contractor sign an agreement to protect the information from unauthorized release and to handle it in accordance with the FIFRA Information Security Manual. In addition, Lockheed Martin is required to submit for EPA approval a security plan under which any CBI will be secured and protected against unauthorized release or compromise. No information will be provided to Lockheed Martin until the requirements in this document have been fully satisfied. Records of information provided to Lockheed Martin will be maintained by EPA Project Officers for these contracts. All information supplied to Lockheed Martin by EPA for use in connection with these contracts will be returned to EPA when Lockheed Martin has completed its work. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES List of Subjects Environmental protection, Business and industry, Government contracts, Government property, Security measures. Dated: December 29, 2005. Brenda Despanza, Acting Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. E6–27 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:23 Jan 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6671–1] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815). Draft EISs EIS No. 20050389, ERP No. D–FHW– J40171–CO, US Highway 160, Transportation Improvements from Junction U.S. 160/550 Durango—East to Bayfield, US Army COE Section 404 Permit, La Plata County, CO. Summary: EPA has environmental concerns with the proposed project regarding impacts to wetlands and cumulative impacts to air quality. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20050433, ERP No. D–FHW– F40433–WI, US Highway 12, Improvement from US12/WI–26 North Fort Atkinson Interchange to Whitewater Bypass, Funding, Rock and Jefferson Counties, WI. Summary: EPA has environmental concerns with the proposed project regarding impacts to wetlands and water quality as well as secondary and cumulative impacts. Rating EC2. Final EISs EIS No. 20050461, ERP No. F–AFS– J65416–WY, Bighorn National Forest Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Big Horn Mountain Range, Bighorn National Forest, Johnson, Sheridan, Bighorn, and Washakie Counties, WY. Summary: While the Final EIS and selected alternative improve monitoring for grazing activities, EPA continues to have environmental concerns with potential adverse environmental impacts, including cumulative impacts to water quality, fisheries and wildlife habitat from new road construction, timber harvest and an 85% reduction of roadless areas. EIS No. 20050486, ERP No. F–AFS– L65479–0R, Timberline Express Project, To Improve the Winter Recreational Opportunities, Implementation, Zigzag Ranger PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 District, Mt. Hood National Forest, Clackamas County, OR. Summary: The final EIS addressed EPA’s environmental concerns about water resources, habitat fragmentation, and infrastructure constraints. Dated: January 3, 2006. Clifford Rader, Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E6–25 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6670–9] Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 12/27/2005 through 12/30/2005 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. EIS No. 20050548, Draft EIS, NPS, NC, North Shore Road, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, General Management Plan, Implementation, Fontana Dam, Swain County, NC, Comment Period Ends: 02/21/2006, Contact: Imelda Wegwerth 865–436– 1302. EIS No. 20050549, Draft EIS, BLM, AZ, Aqua Fria National Monument and Bradshaw-Harquahala, Proposed Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Yavapai County, AZ, Comment Period Ends: 04/07/2006, Contact: Chris Horyza 623–580–5628. EIS No. 20050550, Final EIS, AFS, CA, North Fork Eel Grazing Allotment Management Project, Proposing to Authorize Cattle Grazing on Four Allotment, Six Rivers National Forest, Mad River Ranger District, North Fork Eel River and Upper Mad River, Trinity County, CA, Wait Period Ends: 02/06/2006, Contact: Julie Ranieri 707–441–3673. EIS No. 20050551, Draft EIS, NAS, 00, Programmatic—Development of Advanced Radioisotope Power Systems, Two New Advanced RPS’s: Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) and Stirling Radioisotope Generator (SRG), Comment Period Ends: 02/21/ 2006, Contact: Dr. Ajay Misra 202– 358–1588. EIS No. 20050552, Draft EIS, FRC, FL, Cypress Pipeline Project and Phase VII Expansion Project, Construction and Operation, U.S. Army COE E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-25]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6671-1]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings 
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published 
in FR dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815).

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20050389, ERP No. D-FHW-J40171-CO, US Highway 160, 
Transportation Improvements from Junction U.S. 160/550 Durango--East to 
Bayfield, US Army COE Section 404 Permit, La Plata County, CO.

    Summary: EPA has environmental concerns with the proposed project 
regarding impacts to wetlands and cumulative impacts to air quality. 
Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20050433, ERP No. D-FHW-F40433-WI, US Highway 12, Improvement 
from US12/WI-26 North Fort Atkinson Interchange to Whitewater Bypass, 
Funding, Rock and Jefferson Counties, WI.

    Summary: EPA has environmental concerns with the proposed project 
regarding impacts to wetlands and water quality as well as secondary 
and cumulative impacts. Rating EC2.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20050461, ERP No. F-AFS-J65416-WY, Bighorn National Forest 
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Big Horn 
Mountain Range, Bighorn National Forest, Johnson, Sheridan, Bighorn, 
and Washakie Counties, WY.

    Summary: While the Final EIS and selected alternative improve 
monitoring for grazing activities, EPA continues to have environmental 
concerns with potential adverse environmental impacts, including 
cumulative impacts to water quality, fisheries and wildlife habitat 
from new road construction, timber harvest and an 85% reduction of 
roadless areas.

EIS No. 20050486, ERP No. F-AFS-L65479-0R, Timberline Express Project, 
To Improve the Winter Recreational Opportunities, Implementation, 
Zigzag Ranger District, Mt. Hood National Forest, Clackamas County, OR.

    Summary: The final EIS addressed EPA's environmental concerns about 
water resources, habitat fragmentation, and infrastructure constraints.

    Dated: January 3, 2006.
Clifford Rader,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E6-25 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.