Final Environmental Impact Statement To Fully Integrate the Overhills Property Into the Fort Bragg Training Program, Fort Bragg, NC, 920-921 [06-100]
Download as PDF
920
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices
Commission and its Committee of
Scientific Advisors.
Dated: December 30, 2005.
Shane Guan,
Acting Chief, Permits, Conservation and
Education Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–18 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement
To Fully Integrate the Overhills
Property Into the Fort Bragg Training
Program, Fort Bragg, NC
Department of the Army, DOD.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
to full integrate the Overhills property
into the Fort Bragg Training Program,
Fort Bragg, Cumberland and Harnett
Counties, NC. Presently, realistic
training in Fort Bragg’s Northern
Training Area (NTA), one of Fort Bragg’s
largest training areas, is hampered by
the two sets of training rules that govern
training in the units. Though no
physical barriers separate the Overhills
training units, NTA V–VIII, from NTA
units I–IV, the Overhills Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP) limits the
number of personnel and types of
activities during training exercises,
effectively creating a training barrier.
Applying the same training regulation to
the Overhills that governs training on
the rest of the installation would allow
Fort Bragg to full incorporate the
Overhills into the installation’s training
program, and maximize training
possibilities throughout the NTA.
DATES: Written comments on the FEIS
must be received no later than 30 days
after publication of the notice of
availability (NOA) in the Federal
Register by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to be considered in
preparation of the Record of Decision.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written
comments or requests for copies of the
FEIS to David A. Heins, Chief,
Environmental Sustainment Division,
Public Works Business Center, ATTN:
AFZA–PW–E, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, or
e-mail to david.a.heins@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Heins, (910) 396–8207 or email david.a.heins@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Bragg
serves as headquarters for the XVIII
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Jan 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
Airborne Corps and Army Special
Operations Command, and is home to
the 82nd Airborne Division. The
primary mission of Fort Bragg is the
training and deployment of military
units. Fort Bragg supports the most
intensive and varied training program in
the continental United States. An
average of 2.5 million personnel days of
training is conducted at Fort Bragg and
Camp Mackall (a sub-installation to Fort
Bragg) each year. Training to sustain
readiness is Fort Bragg’s primary
activity.
Land upon which to train personnel
is vital to Fort Bragg’s mission. In 1995,
Fort Bragg directed a study that
identified a shortfall of maneuver land
of 81,876 acres, and a weapons range
and impact area shortfall of 43,636
acres. In order to reduce this training
land deficit, the Department of the
Army purchased the Overhills property
from the Rockefeller family in 1997.
The Overhills property comprises
10,580 acres in Cumberland and Harnett
Counties, NC, and adjoins the northern
boundaries of Fort Bragg and Pope Air
Force Base. An Environmental
Assessment was prepared in 1999 to
adopt an Interim Training Program (ITP)
on the Overhills tract. Under the ITP,
training was restricted to companylevel, low impact (limited) military
training.
Presently, the maneuver/training
areas at Fort Bragg are so heavily
utilized that the land to support training
needs to be used to its fullest extent.
These factors, in conjunction with the
training land deficit identified by Fort
Bragg, demonstrate the need to make
maximum use of available training
lands on Fort Bragg. Fully incorporating
the Overhills tract, which represents the
eastern part of the NTA and comprises
almost half of the training area, into the
installation’s training program would
enhance training throughout the NTA,
and help sustain environmental
resources in other training areas on Fort
Bragg.
The Army proposes to fully integrate
the Overhills into Fort Bragg’s training
program. The FEIS analyzes the No
Action/Status Quo alternative as well as
three action alternatives. Alternatives
considered in detail in the FEIS are:
Alternative 1. (No Action)—Continue
limited training, existing recreation, and
preservation of the Overhills Historic
District (the District). Fort Bragg would
conduct this training in accordance with
existing Fort Bragg Standing Operating
Procedure (SOP) for training on the
Overhills. This SOP limits training
exercises to company-sized units
(approximately 250 personnel,
including exercise support personnel)
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and prescribes the procedures for use of
the Overhills for training. Company-size
exercises generally require fewer than
75 vehicles per exercise. Exercises
would be scheduled 4–6 times per
month. The following types of exercises
are permitted under the Overhills SOP:
Dismounted movement; Air mobile
insertions; Firing of blank small arms
ammunition (up to .50 caliber) and
simulators; Movement of wheeled
vehicles on maintained roads and trails;
Fixed activities limited to bivouac,
signal, or medical in existing clearings;
Military operations on urbanized terrain
training in buildings, but only on noncontributing elements within the
District and non-eligible resources
outside the District; hasty hand-dug
personnel fighting positions; Use of
flame-producing munitions of any type.
Hunting and fishing would continue to
be allowed subject to restrictions
imposed on public access by military
training schedules.
The District would be preserved in
accordance with the ‘‘Standards for
Preservation’’ in the Secretary of
Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties (38 CFR Part 68).
Training in buildings considered
contributing elements would not be
permitted, but maneuvers in open areas
within the historic district boundary
would continue.
Alternative 2. Limited training,
additional recreation, and adaptive
reuse and/or layaway of selected
contributing elements within the
District. Training units would be limited
to company-size (250 personnel plus
support personnel), but training would
be conducted in accordance with the
Installation Range Regulation (IRR), not
the Overhills SOP. The following
additional training would be permitted:
Ground and air maneuvers involving
both mechanized and light infantry with
attached combat support and combat
service support; Operation of wheeled
and tracked vehicles off road; River
crossing, bridging, and waterborne
operations (including water drops);
Construction of fortifications and
obstacles; Helicopter landing zones;
Excavations (in addition to hand-dug
positions) for survivability
emplacements, such as vehicle fighting
positions; and use of tear gas and
obscurant smoke.
A youth golf program and a horse
stables program would be added to the
recreational programs at Fort Bragg.
These programs would utilize several of
the historic buildings and structures on
Overhills such as the Donald Ross golf
course, the polo barn, and riding stables.
New facilities would also be
constructed. Hunting and fishing would
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2006 / Notices
continue as discussed under Alternative
1.
This alternative would maintain the
historic integrity of 15 of the 56
contributing elements of the historic
district. The remaining buildings and
structures would be incorporated into
the Fort Bragg training program after
mitigating for the loss of historical
integrity by fulfilling all requirements
under the National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA), the Fort Bragg Integrated
Cultural Resource Management Plan
(ICRMP) and Army Regulation (AR)
200–4, Cultural Resources Management.
Alternative 3. Intermediate training,
additional recreation, and adaptive
reuse and/or layaway of selected
contributing elements within the
District. Under this alternative, the level
of activity on the Overhills would be
increased to accommodate battalionsized units (approximately 1,000
personnel), plus support personnel.
Training would occur in accordance
with the IRR. There are 40 battalions at
Fort Bragg. Battalion-size field exercises
typically use 75 or fewer vehicles per
exercise, including support vehicles.
Each battalion holds one or two 3-day
field exercises per year. Movement
between NTA units I–IV and Overhills
(NTA V–VIII) would be fluid with no
training restrictions other than the
number of personnel permitted on the
Overhills. Additional recreation would
consist of the youth golf and horse
stables programs described for
Alternative 2. Hunting and fishing
would continue to be permitted, as
discussed in Alternative 1. This
alternative would treat the District as
discussed under Alternative 2.
Alternative 4. (Preferred
Alternative)—Maximum training,
existing recreation, and no preservation
of the District. Under this alternative,
the level of training would be increased
to accommodate brigade-sized units (up
to approximately 5,000 personnel); the
Overhills would be fully incorporated
into the installation’s training program,
and used in the same manner as the
other training areas on Fort Bragg. Units
up to, and including brigade size, would
train in accordance with the IRR.
Hunting and fishing would continue as
discussed under Alternative 1. No
additional recreational use of the
Overhills would occur under maximum
training due to the need for maneuver
frontage and flexibility.
After mitigating for the loss of
historical integrity by fulfillment of all
legal requirements under the NHPA, the
Fort Bragg ICRMP, and AR 200–4, the 56
contributing elements would be
integrated into the training program. All
contributing and non-contributing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:23 Jan 05, 2006
Jkt 208001
921
elements as well as standing structures
determined not eligible for the NRHP
would be evaluated for use in training
exercises. The buildings that could be
incorporated into the training program
would remain; the non-essential
buildings and structures would be
demolished.
The Overhills FEIS provides an
analysis of both the beneficial and
adverse environmental impacts of the
different use alternatives for the
Overhills, and analyzes quantitatively
and qualitatively the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed
alternatives. The resource areas
discussed and evaluated are: Soils,
surface waters, groundwater, wetlands,
vegetation, wildlife, protected species,
hazardous materials/waste management,
solid waste management, air quality,
noise, safety, land use, demographics
and economy, recreation, archaeological
resources, and the historic district. The
FEIS indicates that Alternative 1 (No
Action) has the fewest potential impacts
because no new training types would be
added, and all of the historic buildings
and structures would be preserved.
Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 would have
some potential adverse impacts to
several of the analyzed resources;
however, mitigations to reduce those
impacts are identified in the FEIS.
Minimal comments were received
during the 45-day DEIS comment period
and changes made to the document
were exclusively clarifications and
minor factual changes. Therefore, in
accordance with 32 CFR 651.45(h), only
the DEIS comments, responses to the
comments and the errata sheet are being
circulated. Copies of the comments,
responses and the errata sheet are
available for review at major libraries in
the study area. A copy of the DEIS,
comments and responses, and the errata
sheet may be viewed at: https://
www.bragg.army.mil/envbr/
nepa_review.htm.
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C., App. 2),
announcement is made of the following
Committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Reserve Officers’
Training Corps (ROTC) Program
Subcommittee.
Dates of Meeting: January 24–25,
2006.
Location: Radisson Hotel Hampton,
700 Settlers Landing Road, Hampton,
VA 23669.
Time: 0800–1700 hours, January 24,
2006; 0800–1030 hours, January 25,
2006.
Proposed Agenda: Review and
discuss the Junior and Senior Reserve
Officers’ Training Corps programs;
incentive-based scholarships initiatives;
academic accreditation agencies and
procedures; curriculum review, revision
and validation; and the growth of
Military Science and Leadership as a
college minor.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Pierre Blackwell, U.S. Army Cadet
Command (ATCC–TR), Fort Monroe, VA
23651 at (757) 788–4522.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting is open to the public. Any
interested person may attend, appear
before, or file statements with the
committee.
Thomas M. Jordan,
Brigadier General, USA, Assistant Deputy
Chief of Staff, G–3/5/7 (Readiness), U.S. Army
Forces Command.
[FR Doc. 06–100 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Reserve Officers’ Training Corps
(ROTC) Program Subcommittee
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of open meeting.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–99 Filed 1–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Availability of Non-Exclusive,
Exclusive License or Partially
Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent
Concerning Article of Footwear With
Temperature Regulation Means
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR
404.6, announcement is made of the
availability for licensing of U.S. Patent
No. US 6,981,339 entitled ‘‘Article of
Footwear with Temperature Regulation
Means’’ issued January 3, 2006. This
patent has been assigned to the United
States Government as represented by the
Secretary of the Army.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Rosenkrans at U.S. Army Soldier
Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick,
MA 01760; Phone: (508) 233–4928 or Email:
Robert.Rosenkrans@natick.army.mil.
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 920-921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-100]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement To Fully Integrate the
Overhills Property Into the Fort Bragg Training Program, Fort Bragg, NC
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) to full integrate the
Overhills property into the Fort Bragg Training Program, Fort Bragg,
Cumberland and Harnett Counties, NC. Presently, realistic training in
Fort Bragg's Northern Training Area (NTA), one of Fort Bragg's largest
training areas, is hampered by the two sets of training rules that
govern training in the units. Though no physical barriers separate the
Overhills training units, NTA V-VIII, from NTA units I-IV, the
Overhills Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) limits the number of
personnel and types of activities during training exercises,
effectively creating a training barrier. Applying the same training
regulation to the Overhills that governs training on the rest of the
installation would allow Fort Bragg to full incorporate the Overhills
into the installation's training program, and maximize training
possibilities throughout the NTA.
DATES: Written comments on the FEIS must be received no later than 30
days after publication of the notice of availability (NOA) in the
Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to be
considered in preparation of the Record of Decision.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written comments or requests for copies of the
FEIS to David A. Heins, Chief, Environmental Sustainment Division,
Public Works Business Center, ATTN: AFZA-PW-E, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, or
e-mail to david.a.heins@us.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Heins, (910) 396-8207 or e-
mail david.a.heins@us.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fort Bragg serves as headquarters for the
XVIII Airborne Corps and Army Special Operations Command, and is home
to the 82nd Airborne Division. The primary mission of Fort Bragg is the
training and deployment of military units. Fort Bragg supports the most
intensive and varied training program in the continental United States.
An average of 2.5 million personnel days of training is conducted at
Fort Bragg and Camp Mackall (a sub-installation to Fort Bragg) each
year. Training to sustain readiness is Fort Bragg's primary activity.
Land upon which to train personnel is vital to Fort Bragg's
mission. In 1995, Fort Bragg directed a study that identified a
shortfall of maneuver land of 81,876 acres, and a weapons range and
impact area shortfall of 43,636 acres. In order to reduce this training
land deficit, the Department of the Army purchased the Overhills
property from the Rockefeller family in 1997.
The Overhills property comprises 10,580 acres in Cumberland and
Harnett Counties, NC, and adjoins the northern boundaries of Fort Bragg
and Pope Air Force Base. An Environmental Assessment was prepared in
1999 to adopt an Interim Training Program (ITP) on the Overhills tract.
Under the ITP, training was restricted to company-level, low impact
(limited) military training.
Presently, the maneuver/training areas at Fort Bragg are so heavily
utilized that the land to support training needs to be used to its
fullest extent. These factors, in conjunction with the training land
deficit identified by Fort Bragg, demonstrate the need to make maximum
use of available training lands on Fort Bragg. Fully incorporating the
Overhills tract, which represents the eastern part of the NTA and
comprises almost half of the training area, into the installation's
training program would enhance training throughout the NTA, and help
sustain environmental resources in other training areas on Fort Bragg.
The Army proposes to fully integrate the Overhills into Fort
Bragg's training program. The FEIS analyzes the No Action/Status Quo
alternative as well as three action alternatives. Alternatives
considered in detail in the FEIS are:
Alternative 1. (No Action)--Continue limited training, existing
recreation, and preservation of the Overhills Historic District (the
District). Fort Bragg would conduct this training in accordance with
existing Fort Bragg Standing Operating Procedure (SOP) for training on
the Overhills. This SOP limits training exercises to company-sized
units (approximately 250 personnel, including exercise support
personnel) and prescribes the procedures for use of the Overhills for
training. Company-size exercises generally require fewer than 75
vehicles per exercise. Exercises would be scheduled 4-6 times per
month. The following types of exercises are permitted under the
Overhills SOP:
Dismounted movement; Air mobile insertions; Firing of blank small
arms ammunition (up to .50 caliber) and simulators; Movement of wheeled
vehicles on maintained roads and trails; Fixed activities limited to
bivouac, signal, or medical in existing clearings; Military operations
on urbanized terrain training in buildings, but only on non-
contributing elements within the District and non-eligible resources
outside the District; hasty hand-dug personnel fighting positions; Use
of flame-producing munitions of any type. Hunting and fishing would
continue to be allowed subject to restrictions imposed on public access
by military training schedules.
The District would be preserved in accordance with the ``Standards
for Preservation'' in the Secretary of Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties (38 CFR Part 68). Training in
buildings considered contributing elements would not be permitted, but
maneuvers in open areas within the historic district boundary would
continue.
Alternative 2. Limited training, additional recreation, and
adaptive reuse and/or layaway of selected contributing elements within
the District. Training units would be limited to company-size (250
personnel plus support personnel), but training would be conducted in
accordance with the Installation Range Regulation (IRR), not the
Overhills SOP. The following additional training would be permitted:
Ground and air maneuvers involving both mechanized and light
infantry with attached combat support and combat service support;
Operation of wheeled and tracked vehicles off road; River crossing,
bridging, and waterborne operations (including water drops);
Construction of fortifications and obstacles; Helicopter landing zones;
Excavations (in addition to hand-dug positions) for survivability
emplacements, such as vehicle fighting positions; and use of tear gas
and obscurant smoke.
A youth golf program and a horse stables program would be added to
the recreational programs at Fort Bragg. These programs would utilize
several of the historic buildings and structures on Overhills such as
the Donald Ross golf course, the polo barn, and riding stables. New
facilities would also be constructed. Hunting and fishing would
[[Page 921]]
continue as discussed under Alternative 1.
This alternative would maintain the historic integrity of 15 of the
56 contributing elements of the historic district. The remaining
buildings and structures would be incorporated into the Fort Bragg
training program after mitigating for the loss of historical integrity
by fulfilling all requirements under the National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA), the Fort Bragg Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan
(ICRMP) and Army Regulation (AR) 200-4, Cultural Resources Management.
Alternative 3. Intermediate training, additional recreation, and
adaptive reuse and/or layaway of selected contributing elements within
the District. Under this alternative, the level of activity on the
Overhills would be increased to accommodate battalion-sized units
(approximately 1,000 personnel), plus support personnel. Training would
occur in accordance with the IRR. There are 40 battalions at Fort
Bragg. Battalion-size field exercises typically use 75 or fewer
vehicles per exercise, including support vehicles. Each battalion holds
one or two 3-day field exercises per year. Movement between NTA units
I-IV and Overhills (NTA V-VIII) would be fluid with no training
restrictions other than the number of personnel permitted on the
Overhills. Additional recreation would consist of the youth golf and
horse stables programs described for Alternative 2. Hunting and fishing
would continue to be permitted, as discussed in Alternative 1. This
alternative would treat the District as discussed under Alternative 2.
Alternative 4. (Preferred Alternative)--Maximum training, existing
recreation, and no preservation of the District. Under this
alternative, the level of training would be increased to accommodate
brigade-sized units (up to approximately 5,000 personnel); the
Overhills would be fully incorporated into the installation's training
program, and used in the same manner as the other training areas on
Fort Bragg. Units up to, and including brigade size, would train in
accordance with the IRR. Hunting and fishing would continue as
discussed under Alternative 1. No additional recreational use of the
Overhills would occur under maximum training due to the need for
maneuver frontage and flexibility.
After mitigating for the loss of historical integrity by
fulfillment of all legal requirements under the NHPA, the Fort Bragg
ICRMP, and AR 200-4, the 56 contributing elements would be integrated
into the training program. All contributing and non-contributing
elements as well as standing structures determined not eligible for the
NRHP would be evaluated for use in training exercises. The buildings
that could be incorporated into the training program would remain; the
non-essential buildings and structures would be demolished.
The Overhills FEIS provides an analysis of both the beneficial and
adverse environmental impacts of the different use alternatives for the
Overhills, and analyzes quantitatively and qualitatively the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed alternatives. The resource areas
discussed and evaluated are: Soils, surface waters, groundwater,
wetlands, vegetation, wildlife, protected species, hazardous materials/
waste management, solid waste management, air quality, noise, safety,
land use, demographics and economy, recreation, archaeological
resources, and the historic district. The FEIS indicates that
Alternative 1 (No Action) has the fewest potential impacts because no
new training types would be added, and all of the historic buildings
and structures would be preserved. Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 would have
some potential adverse impacts to several of the analyzed resources;
however, mitigations to reduce those impacts are identified in the
FEIS.
Minimal comments were received during the 45-day DEIS comment
period and changes made to the document were exclusively clarifications
and minor factual changes. Therefore, in accordance with 32 CFR
651.45(h), only the DEIS comments, responses to the comments and the
errata sheet are being circulated. Copies of the comments, responses
and the errata sheet are available for review at major libraries in the
study area. A copy of the DEIS, comments and responses, and the errata
sheet may be viewed at: https://www.bragg.army.mil/envbr/nepa_
review.htm.
Thomas M. Jordan,
Brigadier General, USA, Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7
(Readiness), U.S. Army Forces Command.
[FR Doc. 06-100 Filed 1-5-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M