Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan, 77113-77116 [E5-8036]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
This notice is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it does not involve
decisions on environmental health risks
or safety risks that may
disproportionately affect children. The
EPA believes that the emissions
reductions from the CAIR will further
improve air quality and children’s
health.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
I. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer Advancement Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA
to use voluntary consensus standards in
its regulatory activities unless to do so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The National
Technology Transfer Advancement Act
of 1995 directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
Today’s notice does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 does not
apply.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898, ‘‘Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations,’’ requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact
of programs, policies, and activities on
minority populations and low-income
populations. According to EPA
guidance,17 agencies are to assess
whether minority or low-income
populations face risks or a rate of
17 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1998.
Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice
Concerns in EPA’s NEPA Compliance Analyses.
Office of Federal Activities, Washington, DC, April,
1998.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
exposure to hazards that are significant
and that ‘‘appreciably exceed or is likely
to appreciably exceed the risk or rate to
the general population or to the
appropriate comparison group.’’ (EPA,
1998).
In accordance with Executive Order
12898, the Agency has considered
whether the CAIR may have
disproportionate negative impacts on
minority or low income populations.
The EPA expects the CAIR to lead to
reductions in air pollution and
exposures generally. Therefore, EPA
concluded that negative impacts to
these sub-populations that appreciably
exceed similar impacts to the general
population are not expected. For the
same reasons, EPA is drawing the same
conclusion for today’s notice to
reconsider a certain aspect of the CAIR.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Regional haze, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
dioxide.
40 CFR Part 96
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Electric utilities, Nitrogen oxides,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Dated: December 22, 2005.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05–24609 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2004–MI–0001; FRL–8016–
4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Michigan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
partially approve and partially
disapprove revisions to the Michigan
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were submitted to the EPA by
the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on
April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September
17, 2004, October 25, 2004 and June 8,
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77113
2005. The following sections of
Michigan’s rules are affected: Part 3:
Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Particulate Matter; Part 4:
Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Sulfur-bearing
Compounds; Part 6: Emission
Limitations and Prohibitions—Existing
Sources of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions; Part 7: Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions—New Sources of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions;
Part 9: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Miscellaneous; Part 10:
Intermittent Testing and Sampling; and
Part 11: Continuous Emission
Monitoring. The revisions are primarily
administrative changes and minor
corrections.
Comments must be received on
or before January 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2004–MI–0001, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
• Fax: (312) 886–5824.
• Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
• Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney,
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2004–
MI–0001. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
77114
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This Facility is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. We recommend that you
telephone Kathleen D’Agostino,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886–
1767 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My
Comments for EPA?
II. What Has Michigan Submitted?
III. Did Michigan Hold a Public Hearing?
IV. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of the State
Submittal?
V. What Actions Is EPA Taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
A. Submitting CBI
Do not submit this information to EPA
through https://www.regulations.gov or
e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be
CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI). In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments
When submitting comments,
remember to:
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What Has Michigan Submitted?
On April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003,
September 17, 2004, October 25, 2004,
and June 8, 2005 the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted revisions to the
Michigan State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These submissions revise the
following sections of Michigan’s Air
Pollution Control Rules: R 336.1301, R
336.1303, R 336.1330, R 336.1331
except item C8 of Table 31, R 336.1358,
R 336.1361, R 336.1362, R 336.1363, R
336.1371, R 336.1372, R 336.1374, R
336.1401, R 336.1403, R 336.1601, R
336.1602, R 336.1604 to R 336.1608, R
336.1615 to R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R
336.1623, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
336.1631, R 336.1702, R 336.1705, R
336.1906, R 336.1911, R 336.1930, R
336.2001 to R 336.2005, R 336.2007, R
336.2011 to R 336.2014, R 336.2021, R
336.2040 except subrules (9) and (10), R
336.2041, R 336.2101, R 336.2150, R
336.2155, R 336.2159, R 336.2170, R
336.2175, R 336.2189, and R 336.2190.
The revisions are primarily
administrative changes and minor
corrections.
III. Did Michigan Hold a Public
Hearing?
Michigan held public hearings on
February 2, 2000, October 17, 2001 and
December 2, 2004. No negative
comments were submitted on the rule
revisions.
IV. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of the
State Submittal?
The following is a brief summary of
the revisions and EPA’s evaluation of
them.
Part 3: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Particulate Matter
R 336.1301, 1303, 1330, 1331 except
C8 of Table 31, 1371, 1372, and 1374—
The MDEQ made minor administrative
revisions, e.g., changing terminology
from ‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’
The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1358, R 336.1361, R 336.1362,
R 336.1363—The MDEQ corrected a
subsection reference in each of these
rules. Reference test method 9 was said
to be described in R 336.2004(1)(h)
when the correct section was R
336.2004(1)(l). R 336.2004(h) describes
test method 4. The corrections are
approvable.
Part 4: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Sulfur-bearing
Compounds
R 336.1401 and 1403—The MDEQ
made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
Part 6: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Existing Sources of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
R 336.1601—The MDEQ changed
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revision is
approvable.
R 336.1602—Section 336.1602(2)
requires department approvals of
equivalent emission rates, alternate
emission rates, and compliance methods
reverenced in the section to be
submitted to EPA as a SIP revision. The
MDEQ changed references to rule R
336.1610 contained in this section to
make them consistent with the version
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
of rule R 336.1610 currently applicable
at the state level. The revisions to R
336.1610 have not been approved into
the SIP and are not currently before EPA
for review.1 Therefore, by revising the
references to rule R 336.1610, the
references applicable to the SIP
approved version of rule R 336.1610
would be eliminated. Approval of the
revision to R 336.1602 would relax
RACT in the current SIP approved
version of R 336.1610 by eliminating the
reference requiring alternate methods to
be submitted to EPA as a SIP revision.
This would effectively allow the State to
alter the SIP without EPA review and
approval (director’s discretion). This is
inconsistent with the requirements of
the CAA and with RACT requirements
as set forth in EPA policy guidance
documents, including ‘‘Issues Relating
to VOC Regulation Cutpoints,
Deficiencies and Deviations,
Clarification to Appendix D of
November 24, 1987 Federal Register
Notice’’ dated May 25, 1988. The
revisions to this rule are not approvable.
R 336.1604 to 1608 and 1615 to
1618—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1619 and 1622—The MDEQ
made minor administrative changes,
e.g., updating the date of the CFR
reference, updating the cost of ordering
printed materials. The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1623 and 1627—The MDEQ
made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.1625—The MDEQ revised the
rule to read as follows: ‘‘A person who
is responsible for the operation of a
synthesized pharmaceutical process
subject to the provisions of this rule
shall obtain current information and
maintain records that are necessary for
a determination of compliance with the
provisions of this rule.’’ This language
is consistent with RACT requirements
for synthesized pharmaceutical
manufacturing contained in the control
technology guideline and expressed in
EPA’s model VOC RACT rules. See
Memorandum dated June 24, 1992, from
G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon
Monoxide Programs Branch, entitled
‘‘Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
Rules for Reasonably Available Control
1 It should be noted that the revisions would not
be approvable because they would relax the
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT)
level of controls on Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). See
Sections 182(a)(2)(A) and 182(b)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
Technology (RACT).’’ The MDEQ added
the requirement to keep ‘‘continuous
records of the gas temperature of each
condenser or of a parameter that insures
proper operation of an equivalent
control device used pursuant to subrule
(2)(B) of this rule.’’ The MDEQ also
made minor administrative changes,
e.g., changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.1628—The MDEQ made minor
administrative changes, e.g., updating
the date of the CFR reference, updating
the cost of ordering printed materials.
The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1629—The MDEQ made minor
administrative changes, e.g., noting
where in Michigan’s rules American
Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) methods are adopted by
reference. The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1630—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1631—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions; e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department’’ and updating the name of
a regulated company. The revisions are
approvable.
Part 7: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—New Sources of Volatile
Organic Compound Emissions
R 336.1702 and 1705—The MDEQ
made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
Part 9: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions—Miscellaneous
R 336.1906, 1911 and 1930—The
MDEQ made minor administrative
revisions, e.g., changing terminology
from ‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’
The revisions are approvable.
Part 10: Intermittent Testing and
Sampling
R 336.2001 to 2003—The MDEQ made
minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2004—The MDEQ made minor
administrative changes, e.g., updating
the date of the CFR reference, updating
the cost of ordering printed materials.
The revisions are approvable.
R 336.2005—The MDEQ changed
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revision is
approvable.
R 336.2007—The MDEQ included two
schematic figures that were
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77115
inadvertently omitted in earlier versions
of the rule. The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2011—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The State also corrected
an error in the nomenclature for the
calculations. Specifically, the equation
defining CS was corrected to read ‘‘ CS
= Concentration of particulate matter in
stack gas, pounds per 1,000 pounds of
actual stack gas.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2012 to 2014—The MDEQ made
minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2021—The MDEQ removed
figures 101 and 105. Rule 336.2010, the
only rule referring to these figures, was
rescinded by the state and removed
from the SIP. These revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2040—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2041—There are multiple
problems with this rule. The MDEQ
added language to subrule (1) that
allows the State to alter the SIP without
submitting these changes to EPA for
approval. This is inconsistent with the
CAA and with RACT requirements as
set forth in EPA policy guidance
documents, including ‘‘Issues Relating
to VOC Regulation Cutpoints,
Deficiencies and Deviations,
Clarification to Appendix D of
November 24, 1987 Federal Register
Notice’’ dated May 25, 1988. The MDEQ
also changed references to rule R
336.1610 to reflect revisions to that rule.
However, as discussed above, the
revisions to R 336.1610 have not been
approved into the SIP and are not
approvable because they would relax
RACT requirements. Also, the
rewording of several subparts is
confusing. This rule is not approvable.
Part 11: Continuous Emission
Monitoring
R 336.2101—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
‘‘commission’’ to ‘‘department.’’ The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2150—The MDEQ updated CFR
citations from 1983 to 2000 and made
minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ‘‘department
of natural resources’’ to ‘‘department of
environmental quality.’’ The revisions
are approvable.
R 336.2155—The MDEQ changed
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
77116
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 249 / Thursday, December 29, 2005 / Proposed Rules
‘‘department.’’ The revision is
approvable.
R 336.2159—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2170—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2175—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2189—The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2190—The MDEQ changed
terminology from ‘‘commission’’ to
‘‘department.’’ The revision is
approvable.
V. What Actions Is EPA Taking?
To determine the approvability of a
rule, EPA must evaluate the rule for
consistency with the requirements of
the CAA, EPA regulations and the EPA’s
interpretation of these requirements as
expressed in EPA policy guidance
documents. Rules R 336.1602 and R
336.2041 are inconsistent with the CAA
and the applicable policies by which
EPA must evaluate submittals,
including, ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC
Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies and
Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D
of November 24, 1987 Federal Register
Notice’’ dated May 25, 1988. Therefore,
EPA is proposing to disapprove rules R
336.1602 and R 336.2041. EPA is
proposing to approve the remainder of
the rules.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Executive Order 12866; Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed action merely proposes
to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:10 Dec 28, 2005
Jkt 208001
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule proposes to approve
pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Order 13132 Federalism
This action also does not have
Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act.
Executive Order 13175 Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13045 Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This proposed rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
Executive Order 13211 Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 or a ‘‘significant energy
action,’’ this action is also not subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001).
National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTA), 15 U.S.C. 272,
requires Federal agencies to use
technical standards that are developed
or adopted by voluntary consensus to
carry out policy objectives, so long as
such standards are not inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise
impracticable. In reviewing program
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Act. Absent a prior
existing requirement for the state to use
voluntary consensus standards, EPA has
no authority to disapprove a program
submission for failure to use such
standards, and it would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in place of a program
submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Act. Therefore, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
NTTA do not apply.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 9, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E5–8036 Filed 12–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[OAR–2003–0138, FRL–8017–4]
RIN 2060–AM77
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Organic
Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
public comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On November 14, 2005, at 70
FR 69210, EPA proposed amendments
to the ‘‘National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Organic
Liquids Distribution (Non-Gasoline)’’
E:\FR\FM\29DEP1.SGM
29DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77113-77116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-8036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2004-MI-0001; FRL-8016-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to partially approve and partially
disapprove revisions to the Michigan State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions were submitted to the EPA by the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) on April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September
17, 2004, October 25, 2004 and June 8, 2005. The following sections of
Michigan's rules are affected: Part 3: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Particulate Matter; Part 4: Emission Limitations and
Prohibitions--Sulfur-bearing Compounds; Part 6: Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions--Existing Sources of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions; Part 7: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--New Sources
of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions; Part 9: Emission Limitations
and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous; Part 10: Intermittent Testing and
Sampling; and Part 11: Continuous Emission Monitoring. The revisions
are primarily administrative changes and minor corrections.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2004-MI-0001, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
Fax: (312) 886-5824.
Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section,
(AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant
Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2004-MI-0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you
[[Page 77114]]
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This Facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Kathleen D'Agostino,
Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886-1767 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767, dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. What Has Michigan Submitted?
III. Did Michigan Hold a Public Hearing?
IV. What Is EPA's Evaluation of the State Submittal?
V. What Actions Is EPA Taking?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
A. Submitting CBI
Do not submit this information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments
When submitting comments, remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What Has Michigan Submitted?
On April 3, 2003, May 28, 2003, September 17, 2004, October 25,
2004, and June 8, 2005 the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
(MDEQ) submitted revisions to the Michigan State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These submissions revise the following sections of Michigan's
Air Pollution Control Rules: R 336.1301, R 336.1303, R 336.1330, R
336.1331 except item C8 of Table 31, R 336.1358, R 336.1361, R
336.1362, R 336.1363, R 336.1371, R 336.1372, R 336.1374, R 336.1401, R
336.1403, R 336.1601, R 336.1602, R 336.1604 to R 336.1608, R 336.1615
to R 336.1619, R 336.1622, R 336.1623, R 336.1625, R 336.1627 to R
336.1631, R 336.1702, R 336.1705, R 336.1906, R 336.1911, R 336.1930, R
336.2001 to R 336.2005, R 336.2007, R 336.2011 to R 336.2014, R
336.2021, R 336.2040 except subrules (9) and (10), R 336.2041, R
336.2101, R 336.2150, R 336.2155, R 336.2159, R 336.2170, R 336.2175, R
336.2189, and R 336.2190. The revisions are primarily administrative
changes and minor corrections.
III. Did Michigan Hold a Public Hearing?
Michigan held public hearings on February 2, 2000, October 17, 2001
and December 2, 2004. No negative comments were submitted on the rule
revisions.
IV. What Is EPA's Evaluation of the State Submittal?
The following is a brief summary of the revisions and EPA's
evaluation of them.
Part 3: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Particulate Matter
R 336.1301, 1303, 1330, 1331 except C8 of Table 31, 1371, 1372, and
1374--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g., changing
terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1358, R 336.1361, R 336.1362, R 336.1363--The MDEQ corrected
a subsection reference in each of these rules. Reference test method 9
was said to be described in R 336.2004(1)(h) when the correct section
was R 336.2004(1)(l). R 336.2004(h) describes test method 4. The
corrections are approvable.
Part 4: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Sulfur-bearing Compounds
R 336.1401 and 1403--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
Part 6: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Existing Sources of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
R 336.1601--The MDEQ changed terminology from ``commission'' to
``department.'' The revision is approvable.
R 336.1602--Section 336.1602(2) requires department approvals of
equivalent emission rates, alternate emission rates, and compliance
methods reverenced in the section to be submitted to EPA as a SIP
revision. The MDEQ changed references to rule R 336.1610 contained in
this section to make them consistent with the version
[[Page 77115]]
of rule R 336.1610 currently applicable at the state level. The
revisions to R 336.1610 have not been approved into the SIP and are not
currently before EPA for review.\1\ Therefore, by revising the
references to rule R 336.1610, the references applicable to the SIP
approved version of rule R 336.1610 would be eliminated. Approval of
the revision to R 336.1602 would relax RACT in the current SIP approved
version of R 336.1610 by eliminating the reference requiring alternate
methods to be submitted to EPA as a SIP revision. This would
effectively allow the State to alter the SIP without EPA review and
approval (director's discretion). This is inconsistent with the
requirements of the CAA and with RACT requirements as set forth in EPA
policy guidance documents, including ``Issues Relating to VOC
Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies and Deviations, Clarification to
Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register Notice'' dated May 25,
1988. The revisions to this rule are not approvable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ It should be noted that the revisions would not be
approvable because they would relax the Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) level of controls on Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). See Sections 182(a)(2)(A)
and 182(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
R 336.1604 to 1608 and 1615 to 1618--The MDEQ made minor
administrative revisions, e.g., changing terminology from
``commission'' to ``department.'' The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1619 and 1622--The MDEQ made minor administrative changes,
e.g., updating the date of the CFR reference, updating the cost of
ordering printed materials. The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1623 and 1627--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.1625--The MDEQ revised the rule to read as follows: ``A
person who is responsible for the operation of a synthesized
pharmaceutical process subject to the provisions of this rule shall
obtain current information and maintain records that are necessary for
a determination of compliance with the provisions of this rule.'' This
language is consistent with RACT requirements for synthesized
pharmaceutical manufacturing contained in the control technology
guideline and expressed in EPA's model VOC RACT rules. See Memorandum
dated June 24, 1992, from G.T. Helms, Chief, Ozone/Carbon Monoxide
Programs Branch, entitled ``Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Rules for
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT).'' The MDEQ added the
requirement to keep ``continuous records of the gas temperature of each
condenser or of a parameter that insures proper operation of an
equivalent control device used pursuant to subrule (2)(B) of this
rule.'' The MDEQ also made minor administrative changes, e.g., changing
terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1628--The MDEQ made minor administrative changes, e.g.,
updating the date of the CFR reference, updating the cost of ordering
printed materials. The revisions are approvable.
R 336.1629--The MDEQ made minor administrative changes, e.g.,
noting where in Michigan's rules American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) methods are adopted by reference. The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.1630--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.1631--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions; e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department'' and updating
the name of a regulated company. The revisions are approvable.
Part 7: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--New Sources of Volatile
Organic Compound Emissions
R 336.1702 and 1705--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
Part 9: Emission Limitations and Prohibitions--Miscellaneous
R 336.1906, 1911 and 1930--The MDEQ made minor administrative
revisions, e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to
``department.'' The revisions are approvable.
Part 10: Intermittent Testing and Sampling
R 336.2001 to 2003--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2004--The MDEQ made minor administrative changes, e.g.,
updating the date of the CFR reference, updating the cost of ordering
printed materials. The revisions are approvable.
R 336.2005--The MDEQ changed terminology from ``commission'' to
``department.'' The revision is approvable.
R 336.2007--The MDEQ included two schematic figures that were
inadvertently omitted in earlier versions of the rule. The revisions
are approvable.
R 336.2011--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The State
also corrected an error in the nomenclature for the calculations.
Specifically, the equation defining CS was corrected to read
`` CS = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas,
pounds per 1,000 pounds of actual stack gas.'' The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2012 to 2014--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions,
e.g., changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2021--The MDEQ removed figures 101 and 105. Rule 336.2010,
the only rule referring to these figures, was rescinded by the state
and removed from the SIP. These revisions are approvable.
R 336.2040--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2041--There are multiple problems with this rule. The MDEQ
added language to subrule (1) that allows the State to alter the SIP
without submitting these changes to EPA for approval. This is
inconsistent with the CAA and with RACT requirements as set forth in
EPA policy guidance documents, including ``Issues Relating to VOC
Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies and Deviations, Clarification to
Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register Notice'' dated May 25,
1988. The MDEQ also changed references to rule R 336.1610 to reflect
revisions to that rule. However, as discussed above, the revisions to R
336.1610 have not been approved into the SIP and are not approvable
because they would relax RACT requirements. Also, the rewording of
several subparts is confusing. This rule is not approvable.
Part 11: Continuous Emission Monitoring
R 336.2101--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing ``commission'' to ``department.'' The revisions are
approvable.
R 336.2150--The MDEQ updated CFR citations from 1983 to 2000 and
made minor administrative revisions, e.g., changing terminology from
``department of natural resources'' to ``department of environmental
quality.'' The revisions are approvable.
R 336.2155--The MDEQ changed terminology from ``commission'' to
[[Page 77116]]
``department.'' The revision is approvable.
R 336.2159--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2170--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2175--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2189--The MDEQ made minor administrative revisions, e.g.,
changing terminology from ``commission'' to ``department.'' The
revisions are approvable.
R 336.2190--The MDEQ changed terminology from ``commission'' to
``department.'' The revision is approvable.
V. What Actions Is EPA Taking?
To determine the approvability of a rule, EPA must evaluate the
rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA, EPA regulations
and the EPA's interpretation of these requirements as expressed in EPA
policy guidance documents. Rules R 336.1602 and R 336.2041 are
inconsistent with the CAA and the applicable policies by which EPA must
evaluate submittals, including, ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies and Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of
November 24, 1987 Federal Register Notice'' dated May 25, 1988.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to disapprove rules R 336.1602 and R
336.2041. EPA is proposing to approve the remainder of the rules.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866; Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
Executive Order 13132 Federalism
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act.
Executive Order 13175 Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 13045 Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
Executive Order 13211 Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
Because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 or a ``significant energy action,'' this action
is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTA), 15 U.S.C. 272, requires Federal agencies to use
technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus to carry out policy objectives, so long as such standards are
not inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. In
reviewing program submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Absent a prior
existing requirement for the state to use voluntary consensus
standards, EPA has no authority to disapprove a program submission for
failure to use such standards, and it would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in place of
a program submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Act. Therefore, the requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTA do not
apply.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 9, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E5-8036 Filed 12-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P