City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Heartland Consumers Power District, Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint, 76800-76801 [E5-7932]
Download as PDF
76800
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
January 3, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7919 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 459–144]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. OR06–2–000; IS06–70–000;
IS06–63–000; IS06–71–000; IS06–66–000;
IS06–47–000]
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,
Tesoro Corporation, and Tesoro
Alaska Company v. TAPS Carriers, BP
Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips,
Transportation Alaska, Inc.,
ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, Koch
Alaska Pipeline Company LLC, Unocal
Pipeline Company; Notice of
Complaint
December 19, 2005.
Union Electric Company d/b/a
AmerenUE; Notice Dismissing
Complaint
December 20, 2005.
On December 5, 2005, Osage River
Flood Control Association, Inc. filed a
formal complaint against Union Electric
Company, doing business as AmerenUE,
licensee of the Osage Hydroelectric
Project No. 459. The project is located
on the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri.
The pleading generally alleges that
Osage River Flood Control Association’s
concerns raised during the Alternative
Licensing Process were ignored by
AmerenUE, and requests consideration
of certain issues in the relicense
proceeding for the Osage Project.1
The issues raised in the pleading
relate to conditions to be considered in
the ongoing relicense proceeding. As
such, they are not properly the subject
of a formal complaint. Accordingly, the
complaint is dismissed and the
comments raised in the pleading will be
considered in the relicense proceeding.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7926 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
1 They request consideration of the following: a
30-year license term rather than the 40-year term
requested by AmerenUS; earlier release of water in
anticipation of rain than proposed by AmerenUE;
continuation in the new license of current
maximum flow levels while the project generates
power rather than unlimited flow levels which may
increase erosion; creation of a new flood
management process; the effect of project on lower
river recreation; and assistance by the licensee to
downstream farmers in raising the height of the
access to their islands of farm land in the lower
river.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
Take notice that on December 14,
2005, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation,
Tesoro Corporation, and Tesoro Alaska
Company (collectively, Anadarko/
Tesoro) filed a protest, complaint,
motion to intervene, motion to
consolidate, and request for hearing and
other relief, against BP Pipelines
(Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips
Transportation Alaska, Inc., ExxonMobil
Pipeline Company, Koch Alaska
Pipeline Company LLC, and Unocal
Pipeline Company (collectively, TAPS
Carriers), pursuant to Rules 206, 211,
212, and 214 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedures and sections
8, 9, 13, 15, and 16 of the Interstate
Commerce Act , and the Commission’s
oil pipeline regulations at 18 CFR 343.
Anadarko/Tesoro allege that the rates
filed by TAPS Carriers for oil
transportation on the TAPS are unjust,
unreasonable, and unduly
discriminatory under the ICA, and the
Commission should suspend those
rates, declare those rates subject to
refund, initiate hearing procedures,
establish just and reasonable rates as
required by the ICA, and grant
Anadarko/Tesoro refunds, reparations,
damages (with interest), and other
appropriate relief. Anadarko/Tesoro
request that the Commission consolidate
this protest and complaint with the
ongoing proceedings concerning the
TAPS Carriers’ rates in Docket Nos.
IS05–82 et al.
Anadaro/Tesoro states that copies of
the complaint were served on the
designated contacts for BP Pipelines
(Alaska), Inc. ConocoPhillips
Transportation Alaska, Inc.,
ExxonMobile Pipeline Compnay, Koch
Alaska Pipeline Company LLC., and
Unocal Pipeline Company as listed in
the individual company tariff filings, as
well as on all persons on the official
Commission service list.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
January 3, 2006.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7920 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL06–28–000]
City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and
Heartland Consumers Power District,
Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services,
Inc., Northern States Power Company
(Minnesota), and Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.,
Respondents; Notice of Complaint
December 20, 2005.
Take notice that on December 19,
2005, the City of Sioux Falls, South
Dakota and Hearland Consumers Power
District (City/Heartland) filed a
Complaint against Northern States
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Power Company (Minnesota), Xcel
Energy Services, Inc. (Xcel), and the
Midwest Independent System Operator,
Inc. (MISO), for their alleged refusal to
provide transmission service to the City
for service under the City/NPS
Interconnection & Inter-change
Agreement, Service Schedule F.
City/Heartland states that a copy of
this complaint and supporting
documents have been served upon NSP,
Xcel and MISO.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on
December 29, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7932 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:24 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
4. New York State Electric & Gas
Corporation
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
76801
[Docket No. ES06–13–000]
[Docket Nos. ES06–10–000, et al.]
Southern Power Company, et al.;
Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
December 16, 2005.
The following filings have been made
with the Commission. The filings are
listed in ascending order within each
docket classification.
5. Rochester Gas and Electric
Corporation
1. Southern Power Company
[Docket No. ES06–10–000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2005,
Southern Power Company (Southern
Power) submitted an application
pursuant to section 204 of the Federal
Power Act seeking authorization to
issue: (1) Common stock, preferred
stock, preference stock, preferred
securities, secured and unsecured longterm debt securities and revenue bonds
in an amount not to exceed $500
million; and (2) short-term and term
loan notes and commercial paper in an
amount not to exceed $500 million
outstanding at any one time.
Southern Power also requests a
waiver from the Commission’s
competitive bidding and negotiated
placement requirements at 18 CFR 34.2.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 4, 2006.
2. Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
[Docket No. ES06–11–000]
Take notice that on December 6, 2005,
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (Old
Dominion) submitted an application
pursuant to section 204 of the Federal
Power Act seeking authorization for
certain transactions in order to refinance
an existing lease and leaseback
transaction.
Old Dominion also requests a waiver
from the Commission’s competitive
bidding and negotiated placement
requirements at 18 CFR 34.2.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 4, 2006.
3. Central Maine Power Company
[Docket No. ES06–12–000]
Take notice that on December 7, 2005,
Central Maine Power Company (Central
Maine) submitted an application
pursuant to section 204 of the Federal
Power Act seeking authorization to
issue secured and unsecured short-term
debt in an amount not to exceed $150
million outstanding at any one time.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 5, 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Take notice that on December 7, 2005,
New York State Electric and Gas
Corporation (New York) submitted an
application pursuant to section 204 of
the Federal Power Act seeking
authorization to issue secured and
unsecured short-term debt in an amount
not to exceed $275 million outstanding
at any one time.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 5, 2006.
[Docket No. ES06–14–000]
Take notice that on December 7, 2005,
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation
(Rochester) submitted an application
pursuant to section 204 of the Federal
Power Act seeking authorization to
issue secured and unsecured short-term
debt in an amount not to exceed $200
million outstanding at any one time.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 5, 2006.
6. Commonwealth Edison Company
[Docket No. ES06–15–000]
Take notice that on December 7, 2005,
Commonwealth Edison Company
(Commonwealth Edison) submitted an
application pursuant to section 204 of
the Federal Power Act seeking
authorization to issue promissory notes
and other evidences of secured and
unsecured indebtedness in an amount
not to exceed $2.5 billion outstanding at
any one time.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 5, 2006.
7. PECO Energy Company
[Docket No. ES06–16–000]
Take notice that on December 7, 2005,
PECO Energy Company (PECO)
submitted an application pursuant to
section 204 of the Federal Power Act
seeking authorization to issue
promissory notes and other evidences of
secured and unsecured indebtedness in
an amount not to exceed $1.5 billion
outstanding at any one time.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 5, 2006.
Standard Paragraph
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76800-76801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL06-28-000]
City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Heartland Consumers Power
District, Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Northern States
Power Company (Minnesota), and Midwest Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint
December 20, 2005.
Take notice that on December 19, 2005, the City of Sioux Falls,
South Dakota and Hearland Consumers Power District (City/Heartland)
filed a Complaint against Northern States
[[Page 76801]]
Power Company (Minnesota), Xcel Energy Services, Inc. (Xcel), and the
Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), for their alleged
refusal to provide transmission service to the City for service under
the City/NPS Interconnection & Inter-change Agreement, Service Schedule
F.
City/Heartland states that a copy of this complaint and supporting
documents have been served upon NSP, Xcel and MISO.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on December 29, 2005.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7932 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P