City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Heartland Consumers Power District, Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint, 76800-76801 [E5-7932]

Download as PDF 76800 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on January 3, 2006. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–7919 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 459–144] DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. OR06–2–000; IS06–70–000; IS06–63–000; IS06–71–000; IS06–66–000; IS06–47–000] Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Tesoro Corporation, and Tesoro Alaska Company v. TAPS Carriers, BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips, Transportation Alaska, Inc., ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, Koch Alaska Pipeline Company LLC, Unocal Pipeline Company; Notice of Complaint December 19, 2005. Union Electric Company d/b/a AmerenUE; Notice Dismissing Complaint December 20, 2005. On December 5, 2005, Osage River Flood Control Association, Inc. filed a formal complaint against Union Electric Company, doing business as AmerenUE, licensee of the Osage Hydroelectric Project No. 459. The project is located on the Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri. The pleading generally alleges that Osage River Flood Control Association’s concerns raised during the Alternative Licensing Process were ignored by AmerenUE, and requests consideration of certain issues in the relicense proceeding for the Osage Project.1 The issues raised in the pleading relate to conditions to be considered in the ongoing relicense proceeding. As such, they are not properly the subject of a formal complaint. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed and the comments raised in the pleading will be considered in the relicense proceeding. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–7926 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am] wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 1 They request consideration of the following: a 30-year license term rather than the 40-year term requested by AmerenUS; earlier release of water in anticipation of rain than proposed by AmerenUE; continuation in the new license of current maximum flow levels while the project generates power rather than unlimited flow levels which may increase erosion; creation of a new flood management process; the effect of project on lower river recreation; and assistance by the licensee to downstream farmers in raising the height of the access to their islands of farm land in the lower river. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:37 Dec 27, 2005 Jkt 208001 Take notice that on December 14, 2005, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Tesoro Corporation, and Tesoro Alaska Company (collectively, Anadarko/ Tesoro) filed a protest, complaint, motion to intervene, motion to consolidate, and request for hearing and other relief, against BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., ExxonMobil Pipeline Company, Koch Alaska Pipeline Company LLC, and Unocal Pipeline Company (collectively, TAPS Carriers), pursuant to Rules 206, 211, 212, and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedures and sections 8, 9, 13, 15, and 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act , and the Commission’s oil pipeline regulations at 18 CFR 343. Anadarko/Tesoro allege that the rates filed by TAPS Carriers for oil transportation on the TAPS are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory under the ICA, and the Commission should suspend those rates, declare those rates subject to refund, initiate hearing procedures, establish just and reasonable rates as required by the ICA, and grant Anadarko/Tesoro refunds, reparations, damages (with interest), and other appropriate relief. Anadarko/Tesoro request that the Commission consolidate this protest and complaint with the ongoing proceedings concerning the TAPS Carriers’ rates in Docket Nos. IS05–82 et al. Anadaro/Tesoro states that copies of the complaint were served on the designated contacts for BP Pipelines (Alaska), Inc. ConocoPhillips Transportation Alaska, Inc., ExxonMobile Pipeline Compnay, Koch Alaska Pipeline Company LLC., and Unocal Pipeline Company as listed in the individual company tariff filings, as well as on all persons on the official Commission service list. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent’s answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. The Respondent’s answer, motions to intervene, and protests must be served on the Complainants. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on January 3, 2006. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–7920 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL06–28–000] City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Heartland Consumers Power District, Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), and Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint December 20, 2005. Take notice that on December 19, 2005, the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Hearland Consumers Power District (City/Heartland) filed a Complaint against Northern States E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Power Company (Minnesota), Xcel Energy Services, Inc. (Xcel), and the Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), for their alleged refusal to provide transmission service to the City for service under the City/NPS Interconnection & Inter-change Agreement, Service Schedule F. City/Heartland states that a copy of this complaint and supporting documents have been served upon NSP, Xcel and MISO. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent’s answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. The Respondent’s answer, motions to intervene, and protests must be served on the Complainants. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on December 29, 2005. Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–7932 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:24 Dec 27, 2005 Jkt 208001 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 4. New York State Electric & Gas Corporation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 76801 [Docket No. ES06–13–000] [Docket Nos. ES06–10–000, et al.] Southern Power Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings December 16, 2005. The following filings have been made with the Commission. The filings are listed in ascending order within each docket classification. 5. Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 1. Southern Power Company [Docket No. ES06–10–000] Take notice that on December 6, 2005, Southern Power Company (Southern Power) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue: (1) Common stock, preferred stock, preference stock, preferred securities, secured and unsecured longterm debt securities and revenue bonds in an amount not to exceed $500 million; and (2) short-term and term loan notes and commercial paper in an amount not to exceed $500 million outstanding at any one time. Southern Power also requests a waiver from the Commission’s competitive bidding and negotiated placement requirements at 18 CFR 34.2. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 4, 2006. 2. Old Dominion Electric Cooperative [Docket No. ES06–11–000] Take notice that on December 6, 2005, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (Old Dominion) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization for certain transactions in order to refinance an existing lease and leaseback transaction. Old Dominion also requests a waiver from the Commission’s competitive bidding and negotiated placement requirements at 18 CFR 34.2. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 4, 2006. 3. Central Maine Power Company [Docket No. ES06–12–000] Take notice that on December 7, 2005, Central Maine Power Company (Central Maine) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue secured and unsecured short-term debt in an amount not to exceed $150 million outstanding at any one time. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2006. PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Take notice that on December 7, 2005, New York State Electric and Gas Corporation (New York) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue secured and unsecured short-term debt in an amount not to exceed $275 million outstanding at any one time. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2006. [Docket No. ES06–14–000] Take notice that on December 7, 2005, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (Rochester) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue secured and unsecured short-term debt in an amount not to exceed $200 million outstanding at any one time. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2006. 6. Commonwealth Edison Company [Docket No. ES06–15–000] Take notice that on December 7, 2005, Commonwealth Edison Company (Commonwealth Edison) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue promissory notes and other evidences of secured and unsecured indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $2.5 billion outstanding at any one time. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2006. 7. PECO Energy Company [Docket No. ES06–16–000] Take notice that on December 7, 2005, PECO Energy Company (PECO) submitted an application pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act seeking authorization to issue promissory notes and other evidences of secured and unsecured indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $1.5 billion outstanding at any one time. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2006. Standard Paragraph Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM 28DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76800-76801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-28-000]


City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Heartland Consumers Power 
District, Complainant, v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Northern States 
Power Company (Minnesota), and Midwest Independent Transmission System 
Operator, Inc., Respondents; Notice of Complaint

December 20, 2005.
    Take notice that on December 19, 2005, the City of Sioux Falls, 
South Dakota and Hearland Consumers Power District (City/Heartland) 
filed a Complaint against Northern States

[[Page 76801]]

Power Company (Minnesota), Xcel Energy Services, Inc. (Xcel), and the 
Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc. (MISO), for their alleged 
refusal to provide transmission service to the City for service under 
the City/NPS Interconnection & Inter-change Agreement, Service Schedule 
F.
    City/Heartland states that a copy of this complaint and supporting 
documents have been served upon NSP, Xcel and MISO.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on December 29, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7932 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P