Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated Authority, 76834-76836 [E5-7873]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
76834
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
The Commission has considered a
number of preemption items since the
passage of the Telecommunications Act
of 1996, and believes it in the public
interest to inform the public of the
information necessary to support its full
consideration of the issues likely to be
involved in preemption actions.
The Commission will use the
information to discharge its statutory
mandate relating to the preemption of
state or local statutes or other state or
local legal requirements.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0876.
Title: USAC Board of Directors
Nomination Process (47 CFR Section
54.703) and Review of Administrator’s
Decision (47 CFR Sections 54.719–
54.725).
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,312.
Estimated Time Per Response: 20–32
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 41,840 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance. Pursuant to 47 CFR 54.703,
industry and non-industry groups may
submit to the Commission for approval
nominations for individuals to be
appointed to the Universal Service
Administrative Company (USAC) Board
of Directors. Sections 54.719 through
54.725 contain the procedures for
Commission review of USAC decisions,
including the general filing
requirements which parties must file
requests for review. The information is
used by the Commission to select the
USAC Board of Directors and to ensure
that requests for review are filed
properly with the Commission.
OMB Control No.: 3060–1031.
Title: Revision of the Commission’s
Rules to Ensure Compatibility with
Enhanced 911 Emergency Calling
Systems—Petition of the City of
Richardson, TX, Order on
Reconsideration II.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 1,158.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2–4
hours.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 6,576 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
This collection contains various
reporting and third party disclosure
requirements. Under the Commission’s
E911 rules, a wireless carrier must
provide E911 service to a particular
Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP)
within six months only if that PSAP
makes a request for the service and is
capable of receiving and utilizing the
information provided. In the City of
Richardson Order on Reconsideration,
the Commission adopted rules clarifying
what constitutes a valid PSAP request
so as to trigger a wireless carrier’s
obligation to provide service to a PSAP
within six months. The Order on
Reconsideration modified the E911
rules to provide additional clarification
on the issue of PSAP readiness. The
Commission’s actions were intended to
facilitate the E911 implementation
process by encouraging parties to
communicate with each other early in
the implementation process, and to
maintain a constructive, on-going
dialogue throughout the implementation
process.
The Order on Reconsideration
contained three new public information
collection burdens subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). First,
the Commission adopted procedural
guidelines for requesting documentation
predictive of a PSAP’s readiness to
receive and utilize the enhanced 911
service it has requested. Specifically, we
provide that, where a wireless carrier
requests such documentation from a
PSAP within 15 days of receiving the
PSAP’s request for E911 service, the
PSAP must respond within 15 days or
the carrier’s six-month implementation
period will be tolled until such
documentation is provided. Second, the
Commission clarified that the readiness
showing is for the purpose of
commencing the wireless carrier’s sixmonth implementation obligation; and
we established a procedure whereby
wireless carriers that have completed all
necessary steps toward E911
implementation are not dependent on
PSAP readiness may have their
compliance obligation temporarily
tolled, if the PSAP is not ready to
receive the information at the end of the
six-month period and carrier files a
certification to that effect with the
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission. Finally, the Commission
clarified that nothing in our rules
precludes wireless carriers and PSAPs
from mutually agreeing to an
implementation schedule different from
that prescribed by our rules.
The Commission will use the
certification filings from wireless
carriers to determine each carrier’s
compliance with its E911 obligations.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7871 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission
for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
December 15, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on
this information collection should
submit comments by February 27, 2006.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
You may submit your
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
comments by e-mail or U.S. postal mail.
To submit you comments by e-mail send
them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your
comments by U.S. mail, mark it to the
attention of Judith B. Herman, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room 1–C804, Washington,
DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e-mail
to PRA@fcc.gov or contact Judith B.
Herman at 202–418–0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–1036.
Title: Potential Reporting
Requirements on Local Exchange
Carriers (LECs) to Assist Expeditious
Implementation of Wireless E911
Service.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 6
respondents; 24 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 8
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 192 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
In the City of Richardson
reconsideration order released
November 2002, the Commission
indicated its concern about the potential
threat to timely wireless E911
deployment posed by a delay or lack of
cooperation on the part of the LECs. To
ensure that LECs timely perform their
role in the successful deployment of
wireless E911 services, the Commission
gathers information, on a periodic basis,
from six of the nation’s largest Local
Exchange Carriers (LECs) regarding the
status of their efforts in connection with
wireless E911 deployment. The
information will be used by the
Commission to determine whether the
LECs are meeting their responsibilities
to provide access to, and
interconnection with, their networks for
E911 purposes.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0910.
Title: Third Report and Order in CC
Docket No. 94–102, Revision of the
Commission’s Rules to Ensure
Compatibility with Enhanced 911
Emergency Calling Systems.
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit and not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 4,000
respondents; 8,000 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 4,000 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
Commission rules allows wireless
carriers to permit the use of handsetbased solutions, or hybrid solutions that
require changes both to handsets and
wireless networks, in providing caller
location information as part of enhanced
911 services. Those rules also require
carriers to report changes in their
deployment plans. The information in
these reports will provide public service
answering points (PSAPs), providers of
location technology, investors,
manufacturers, local exchange carriers
(LECs), and the Commission with
valuable information necessary for
preparing for full Phase II E911
implementation. These reports will
provide helpful, if not essential
information, for coordinating carrier
plans with those manufacturers and
PSAPs. It will also assist the
Commission’s efforts to monitor Phase II
developments and to take necessary
actions to maintain the Phase II
implementation schedule.
OMB Control No.: 3060–1027.
Title: Section 27.602, Guard Band
Manager Agreements.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit.
Number of Respondents: 62.
Estimated Time Per Response: 6
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, third party
disclosure requirement and
recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 372 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
The Commission adopted service
rules for 27 megahertz of
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76835
electromagnetic spectrum in the 216–
220 MHz, 1390–1395 MHz, 1427–1429.5
MHz, 1429.5–1432 MHz, 1432–1435
MHz, 1670–1675 MHz, and 2385–2390
MHz bands, which have been
reallocated for non-Government use.
The service rules adopted establish a
flexible regulatory and licensing
framework. The Commission believes
that this decision will provide
opportunities for new services to utilize
this spectrum, thus addressing spectrum
scarcity concerns, as well as to promote
the delivery of technologically
innovative services to the public. The
originally exempt frequencies of Private
Land Mobile licensees are now required
to obtain guard band manager
agreements with other licensees who
plan on using their licensed spectrum.
Guard Band Managers are required to
enter into written agreements regarding
the use of their licensed spectrum by
others, subject to certain conditions
outlined in Commission rules, and
retain such records for at least two years
after the date such agreements expire.
Such records need to be kept current
and be made available upon request for
inspection by the Commission or its
representatives.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0400.
Title: Tariff Review Plan.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Estimated Time Per Response: 61
hours.
Frequency of Response: Biennial and
annual reporting requirements.
Total Annual Burden: 2,440 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
Certain local exchange carriers are
required to submit a biennial or annual
Tariff Review Plan in partial fulfillment
of cost support material required by 47
CFR part 61. The information is used by
FCC and the public to determine the
justness and reasonableness of rates,
terms and conditions in tariffs as
required by the Communications Act of
1934, as amended.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0514.
Title: Section 43.21(b), Holding
Company Annual Report.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
76836
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
Number of Respondents: 17.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 17 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
The filing of SEC Form 10–K is
required by section 1.785 and 43.21(b)
of the Commission’s rules and
authorized by section 219 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended. Each company, not itself a
communications common carrier, that
directly or indirectly controls any
communications common carrier having
annual revenues equal to or above the
indexed revenue threshold, as defined
in section 32.9000, shall file annually
with the Commission, not later than the
date prescribed by Security and
Exchange Commission (SEC), for its
purposes, two complete copies of any
SEC Form 10–K annual report (or any
superseding form) filed with that
Commission.
The information filed pursuant to
section 43.21(b) is used by staff
members to regulate and monitor the
telephone industry and by the public to
analyze the industry. Selected
information is compiled and published
in the Commission’s annual common
carrier statistical publication.
OMB Control No.: 3060–0755.
Title: Sections 59.1 through 59.4,
Infrastructure Sharing.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit.
Number of Respondents: 75.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2–24
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement and third party
disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 2,325 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will
be submitted as an extension (after this
60 day comment period) to OMB in
order to obtain the full three year
clearance.
Section 259 requires incumbent local
exchange carriers (LECs) to file any
arrangements showing the conditions
under which they share infrastructure.
Section 259 also requires incumbent
LECs to provide information on
deployments of new services and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
equipment to qualifying carriers.
Finally, the Commission requires
incumbent LECs to provide 60 day
notice prior to terminating section 259
agreements.
The Commission uses the information
in the following ways: (1) The
information collected under the
requirement that LECs file any tariffs,
contracts or other arrangements for
infrastructure sharing will be made
available for public inspection; (2) the
information collected under the
requirement that incumbent LECs
provide timely information on planned
deployments of new services and
equipment will be provided to third
parties (qualifying carriers); and (3) the
information collected under the
requirement that providing incumbent
LECs furnish 60 days notice prior to
termination of a section 259 sharing
agreement will be provided to third
parties, i.e., qualifying carriers, to
protect customers from sudden changes
in service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7873 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[Report No. AUC–05–64–B (Auction No. 64);
DA 05–2987]
Auction of Full Power Television
Construction Permits Scheduled for
March 15, 2006, Notice and Filing
Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids,
Upfront Payments and Other
Procedures for Auction No. 64
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
procedures and minimum opening bids
for the upcoming auction of eleven full
power television station construction
permits. This document is intended to
familiarize prospective bidders with the
procedures and minimum opening bids
for Auction No. 64.
DATES: Auction No. 64 short-form
applications are due before 6 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET) on January 20, 2006.
Upfront payments are due before 6 p.m.
ET on February 17, 2006. Competitive
bidding is scheduled to begin on March
15, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Auction and Spectrum Access Division,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau:
for legal questions: Lynne Milne at (202)
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
418–0660; for general auction questions:
Debbie Smith or Lisa Stover at (717)
338–2888. Video Division, Media
Bureau: for service rule questions:
Shaun Maher at (202) 418–2324 or
Shaleim Henry at (202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Auction No. 64
Procedures Public Notice released on
November 23, 2005. The complete text
of the Auction No. 64 Procedures Public
Notice, including attachments and
related Commission documents, is
available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Monday through Thursday or from 8
a.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Friday at the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The Auction No.
64 Procedures Public Notice and related
Commission documents may also be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (‘‘BCPI’’), Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 202–
488–5300, facsimile 202–488–5563, or
Web site: https://www.BCPIWEB.com.
When ordering documents from BCPI,
please provide the appropriate FCC
document number (for example, DA 05–
2987 for the Auction No. 64 Procedures
Public Notice). The Auction No. 64
Procedures Public Notice and related
documents are available also on the
Internet at the Commission’s Web site:
https://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/64/.
I. General Information
A. Introduction
1. The Media Bureau (MB) and the
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
(WTB) (collectively the Bureaus)
announce the procedures and minimum
opening bid amounts for the auction of
11 full power television station
construction permits in Auction No. 64,
scheduled to begin on March 15, 2006.
On September 23, 2005, in accordance
with 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(4), the Bureaus
released a public notice seeking
comment on reserve prices or minimum
opening bid amounts and the
procedures to be used in Auction No.
64. The Bureaus received comments
from one commenter in response to the
Auction No. 64 Comment Public Notice,
70 FR 58700 (October 7, 2005).
i. Background
2. The Commission’s competitive
bidding rules will be used to select
among mutually exclusive applications
for these construction permits in
Auction No. 64. When two or more
short-form applications are accepted for
filing for the same construction permit
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76834-76836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7873]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the
Federal Communications Commission for Extension Under Delegated
Authority
December 15, 2005.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control
number. Comments are requested concerning (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection should
submit comments by February 27, 2006. If you anticipate that you will
be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the
period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact
listed below as soon as possible.
[[Page 76835]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit your Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments
by e-mail or U.S. postal mail. To submit you comments by e-mail send
them to: PRA@fcc.gov. To submit your comments by U.S. mail, mark it to
the attention of Judith B. Herman, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW., Room 1-C804, Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection(s) send an e-mail to PRA@fcc.gov or contact
Judith B. Herman at 202-418-0214.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060-1036.
Title: Potential Reporting Requirements on Local Exchange Carriers
(LECs) to Assist Expeditious Implementation of Wireless E911 Service.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 6 respondents; 24 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 8 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 192 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
In the City of Richardson reconsideration order released November
2002, the Commission indicated its concern about the potential threat
to timely wireless E911 deployment posed by a delay or lack of
cooperation on the part of the LECs. To ensure that LECs timely perform
their role in the successful deployment of wireless E911 services, the
Commission gathers information, on a periodic basis, from six of the
nation's largest Local Exchange Carriers (LECs) regarding the status of
their efforts in connection with wireless E911 deployment. The
information will be used by the Commission to determine whether the
LECs are meeting their responsibilities to provide access to, and
interconnection with, their networks for E911 purposes.
OMB Control No.: 3060-0910.
Title: Third Report and Order in CC Docket No. 94-102, Revision of
the Commission's Rules to Ensure Compatibility with Enhanced 911
Emergency Calling Systems.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit and not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents: 4,000 respondents; 8,000 responses.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 4,000 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
Commission rules allows wireless carriers to permit the use of
handset-based solutions, or hybrid solutions that require changes both
to handsets and wireless networks, in providing caller location
information as part of enhanced 911 services. Those rules also require
carriers to report changes in their deployment plans. The information
in these reports will provide public service answering points (PSAPs),
providers of location technology, investors, manufacturers, local
exchange carriers (LECs), and the Commission with valuable information
necessary for preparing for full Phase II E911 implementation. These
reports will provide helpful, if not essential information, for
coordinating carrier plans with those manufacturers and PSAPs. It will
also assist the Commission's efforts to monitor Phase II developments
and to take necessary actions to maintain the Phase II implementation
schedule.
OMB Control No.: 3060-1027.
Title: Section 27.602, Guard Band Manager Agreements.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit.
Number of Respondents: 62.
Estimated Time Per Response: 6 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, third
party disclosure requirement and recordkeeping requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 372 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
The Commission adopted service rules for 27 megahertz of
electromagnetic spectrum in the 216-220 MHz, 1390-1395 MHz, 1427-1429.5
MHz, 1429.5-1432 MHz, 1432-1435 MHz, 1670-1675 MHz, and 2385-2390 MHz
bands, which have been reallocated for non-Government use. The service
rules adopted establish a flexible regulatory and licensing framework.
The Commission believes that this decision will provide opportunities
for new services to utilize this spectrum, thus addressing spectrum
scarcity concerns, as well as to promote the delivery of
technologically innovative services to the public. The originally
exempt frequencies of Private Land Mobile licensees are now required to
obtain guard band manager agreements with other licensees who plan on
using their licensed spectrum. Guard Band Managers are required to
enter into written agreements regarding the use of their licensed
spectrum by others, subject to certain conditions outlined in
Commission rules, and retain such records for at least two years after
the date such agreements expire. Such records need to be kept current
and be made available upon request for inspection by the Commission or
its representatives.
OMB Control No.: 3060-0400.
Title: Tariff Review Plan.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Estimated Time Per Response: 61 hours.
Frequency of Response: Biennial and annual reporting requirements.
Total Annual Burden: 2,440 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
Certain local exchange carriers are required to submit a biennial
or annual Tariff Review Plan in partial fulfillment of cost support
material required by 47 CFR part 61. The information is used by FCC and
the public to determine the justness and reasonableness of rates, terms
and conditions in tariffs as required by the Communications Act of
1934, as amended.
OMB Control No.: 3060-0514.
Title: Section 43.21(b), Holding Company Annual Report.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit.
[[Page 76836]]
Number of Respondents: 17.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 17 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
The filing of SEC Form 10-K is required by section 1.785 and
43.21(b) of the Commission's rules and authorized by section 219 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Each company, not itself a
communications common carrier, that directly or indirectly controls any
communications common carrier having annual revenues equal to or above
the indexed revenue threshold, as defined in section 32.9000, shall
file annually with the Commission, not later than the date prescribed
by Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), for its purposes, two
complete copies of any SEC Form 10-K annual report (or any superseding
form) filed with that Commission.
The information filed pursuant to section 43.21(b) is used by staff
members to regulate and monitor the telephone industry and by the
public to analyze the industry. Selected information is compiled and
published in the Commission's annual common carrier statistical
publication.
OMB Control No.: 3060-0755.
Title: Sections 59.1 through 59.4, Infrastructure Sharing.
Form No.: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for profit.
Number of Respondents: 75.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2-24 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement and third
party disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 2,325 hours.
Annual Cost Burden: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Needs and Uses: This collection will be submitted as an extension
(after this 60 day comment period) to OMB in order to obtain the full
three year clearance.
Section 259 requires incumbent local exchange carriers (LECs) to
file any arrangements showing the conditions under which they share
infrastructure. Section 259 also requires incumbent LECs to provide
information on deployments of new services and equipment to qualifying
carriers. Finally, the Commission requires incumbent LECs to provide 60
day notice prior to terminating section 259 agreements.
The Commission uses the information in the following ways: (1) The
information collected under the requirement that LECs file any tariffs,
contracts or other arrangements for infrastructure sharing will be made
available for public inspection; (2) the information collected under
the requirement that incumbent LECs provide timely information on
planned deployments of new services and equipment will be provided to
third parties (qualifying carriers); and (3) the information collected
under the requirement that providing incumbent LECs furnish 60 days
notice prior to termination of a section 259 sharing agreement will be
provided to third parties, i.e., qualifying carriers, to protect
customers from sudden changes in service.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7873 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P