Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: Thomas Burke Memorial Washington State Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 76865-76866 [05-24509]
Download as PDF
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
No associated funerary objects are
present.
In 1959, human remains representing
a minimum of three individuals were
removed from the Banks site (Arkansas–
31A) in Crittendon County, AR, by Greg
Perino. Mr. Perino donated the human
remains to the Oklahoma Museum of
Natural History later that same year. No
known individuals were identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
Diagnostic artifacts found at the
Cummin’s Place, Upper Nodena Place,
and Banks sites indicate that the human
remains are Native American and were
probably buried during the Parkin phase
of the Mississippian nucleation horizon
(A.D. 1350–1650). The Parkin phase is
characterized by Nodena leaf-shaped
arrow points, Madison arrow points,
pipe drills, chisels, adzes, use of basalt,
conch shell beads, mushroom shaped
beads, ear plugs, copper disks,
discoidals, catlinite pipes, Parkin
punctate and Barton incised pottery,
Mississippian Plain pottery, effigy forms
such as, head pots, compound vessels,
and occasionally red and white Nodena
ware. Although many of these types of
artifacts were found at the sites, none of
the artifacts besides the missing deer
bone are considered associated funerary
objects because they were not found in
a burial context nor is there any other
information that attests to their being
from a burial context. Many of the
Parkin phase artifact traits continued to
be practiced by people later identified
as Quapaw. European documentation
concerning the geographical range of the
Quapaw people supports their presence
in the northeastern part of Arkansas.
Present-day descendants of the Quapaw
people are members of the Quapaw
Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma.
Officials of the Sam Noble Oklahoma
Museum of Natural History have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001 (9–10), the human remains
described above represent the physical
remains of seven individuals of Native
American ancestry. Officials of the Sam
Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural
History also have determined that,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001 (2), there is
a relationship of shared group identity
that can be reasonably traced between
the Native American human remains
and the Quapaw Tribe of Indians,
Oklahoma.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the human remains
should contact Dr. Ellen Censky,
Director, Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum
of Natural History, University of
Oklahoma, 2401 Chautauqua, Norman,
OK 73072, telephone (405) 325–4712,
before January 27, 2006. Repatriation of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
the human remains to the Quapaw Tribe
of Indians, Oklahoma may proceed after
that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of
Natural History is responsible for
notifying the Quapaw Tribe of Indians,
Oklahoma that this notice has been
published.
Dated: December 3, 2005.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. E5–7886 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural
Items: Thomas Burke Memorial
Washington State Museum, University
of Washington, Seattle, WA
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is hereby given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the intent
to repatriate cultural items in the
possession of the Thomas Burke
Memorial Washington State Museum
(Burke Museum), University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, that meet the
definition of ‘‘unassociated funerary
objects’’ under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sold responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the cultural
items. The National Park Service is not
responsible for the determinations in
this notice.
The 12 cultural items are 7 beaded
necklaces (beads include glass trade
beads, shell beads, and copper beads), 1
bracelet, 3 sets of pipe fragments, and 1
piece of twine.
At an unknown date, the 12 cultural
items were removed from a small island
just upriver from Blalock Island in the
lower Columbia River, Benton County,
WA, by Mr. John Tomaske, an
archaeology graduate student of the
University of Washington. In 1960, the
cultural items were donated to the
University of Washington Department of
Anthropology, and subsequently
transferred to the Burke Museum and
accessioned in 1973 (Burke Accn.
#1973–8). Accession information
indicated the presence of burials at the
site. According to Mr. Tomaske, the
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76865
burials had previously been disturbed
and exhibited evidence of cremation.
The human remains are not in the
possession of the Burke Museum.
The small island just upriver from
Blalock Island described in museum
records could be Cook’s Island, which
was formerly recorded as containing
cremation burials. Archaeological
evidence for Cook’s Island supports the
presence of cremation burials.
Cremation and burial on islands in the
Columbia River were customary
practices of the Umatilla. It was also the
practice of the Umatilla that individuals
were buried with many of their personal
belongings. The area surrounding
Blalock Island was heavily utilized by
the Umatilla, including ama’amapa,
which served as a habitation area, burial
site, and stronghold from enemies. On
Blalock Island, and along the
Washington side of the Columbia River,
the Umatilla had a permanent camp,
Yep-po-luc-sha (or Yep-po-kuc-sha), as
well as a fishing area.
Burial practices and funerary objects
described are consistent with historic
practices of the present-day
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Reservation, Oregon. The area
surrounding Blalock Island is within the
aboriginal territory of the Confederated
Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation,
Oregon and the land claims boundaries
of the Indian Claims Commission
decision of 1960.
Officials of the Burke Museum have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001(3)(B), the 12 cultural items
described above are reasonably believed
to have been placed with or near
individual human remains at the time of
death or later as part of the death rite
or ceremony and are believed, by a
preponderance of the evidence, to have
been removed from a specific burial site
of a Native American individual.
Officials of the Burke Museum also have
determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001(2), there is a relationship of shared
group identity that can be reasonably
traced between funerary objects and the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Reservation, Oregon.
Representatives of any other Indian
tribe that believes itself to be culturally
affiliated with the unassociated funerary
objects should contact Dr. Peter Lape,
Burke Museum, University of
Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA
98195–3010, telephone (206) 685–2282,
before January 27, 2006. Repatriation of
the unassociated funerary objects to the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Reservation, Oregon may proceed after
that date if no additional claimants
come forward.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
76866
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 28, 2005 / Notices
The Burke Museum is responsible for
notifying the Confederated Tribes of the
Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this
notice has been published.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 05–24509 Filed 12–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 04–31]
wwhite on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Joey Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a/ NorthStar
Wholesale Denial of Application
On March 2, 2004, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), issued an Order
to Show Cause to Joey Enterprises, Inc.,
d/b/a NorthStar Wholesale (hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘Respondent’’) of
Birmingham, Alabama. The show cause
order proposed to deny the
Respondent’s February 10, 2003,
application for DEA Certificate of
Registration as a distributor of list I
chemicals. The Order to Show Cause
alleged in substance that granting the
application of the Respondent would be
inconsistent with the public interest as
that term is used in 21 U.S.C. 823(h).
According to the DEA investigative
file, on or about March 30, 2004, the
Respondent, through its President Feroz
Jiwani (Mr. Jiwani), requested a hearing
in response to the show cause order. On
April 22, 2004, the presiding
Administrative Law Judge issued an
Order for Pre-hearing Statements. As
part of that Order, the Administrative
Law Judge directed the Government to
file its Pre-hearing Statement on or
before May 14, 2004, and that the
Respondent was to file its Pre-hearing
Statement on or before June 4, 2004.
Following pre-hearing motions
extending the above scheduled filing
dates, the Government filed its Prehearing Statement on July 21, 2004.
However, the Respondent did not file its
Pre-hearing Statement by the August 16,
2004 deadline.
On September 2, 2004, the
Administrative Law Judge issued an
order extending the filing date of the
Respondent’s Pre-hearing Statement to
September 15, 2004. The Administrative
Law Judge’s Order also notified the
Respondent that if it again failed to meet
the deadline for filing a Pre-hearing
Statement, such inaction would be
deemed a waiver of its hearing
entitlement. Nevertheless, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 27, 2005
Jkt 208001
Respondent again failed to meet the new
deadline and did not file its Pre-hearing
Statement. Accordingly, on September
29, 2004, the Administrative Law Judge
issued her Order Terminating the
Proceedings.
The Deputy Administrator adopts the
ruling of the Administrative Law Judge’s
termination order that the Respondent
has waived its hearing right. See, Aqui
Enterprises, 67 FR 12576 (2002). After
considering relevant material from the
investigative file in this matter, the
Deputy Administrator now enters her
final order without a hearing pursuant
to 21 CFR 1309.53(b) and (d). The
Deputy Administrator finds as follows:
List I chemicals are those that may be
used in the manufacture of a controlled
substance in violation of the Controlled
Substances Act. 21 U.S.C. 802(34); 21
CFR 1310.02(a). As noted in previous
DEA final orders, pseudoephedrine and
ephedrine are list I chemicals
commonly used to illegally manufacture
methamphetamine, a Schedule II
controlled substance.
Methamphetamine is an extremely
potent central nervous system stimulant
and its illicit manufacture and abuse are
ongoing public health concerns in the
United States. See e.g., Direct
Wholesale, 69 FR 11654 (2004); Yemen
Wholesale Tobacco and Candy Supply,
Inc., 67 FR 9997 (2002); Denver
Wholesale, 67 FR 99986 (2002).
The investigative file contains a
printed news release article from the
DEA Web site regarding federal drug
seizures and the abuse of
methamphetamine in the State of
Alabama. https://www.dea.gov/pubs/
states/alabama.html. According to the
article, methamphetamine has become
the number one abused drug in
Alabama. The article also tracked the
‘‘dramatic increase’’ in the number of
methamphetamine laboratory seizures
in the state from 1997 to 2003.
According to data obtained by DEA’s El
Paso Intelligence Center (also known as
‘‘EPIC’’), in 1997, methamphetamine
laboratory seizures in Alabama totaled
six; by 2002, the total number of
laboratory seizures climbed to 201.
The above-referenced registration
application of the Respondent was
initially submitted under the business
name ‘‘Joey Enterprises, Inc.,’’ and was
later amended to include the caption,
‘‘d.b.a. Northstar Wholesale.’’ The
Respondent sought DEA registration as
a distributor of the list I chemicals
ephedrine, pseudoephedrine and
phenylpropanolamine. There is no
evidence in the investigative file that
Respondent, or anyone purporting to
represent the Respondent has sought to
further modify its pending application.
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Deputy Administrator’s review of
the investigative file reveals that on
September 3, 2003, DEA Diversion
Investigators conducted an on-site preregistration inspection at Respondent’s
proposed registered location in
Birmingham. DEA’s investigation
revealed that Mr. Jiwani is the owner
and President of the Respondent, his
wife, Amynah, is the company’s
assistant manager, and the company
also employs a part-time employee by
the first name of Christopher. When
asked by DEA investigators, neither Mr.
nor Mrs. Jiwani knew the part-time
employee’s last name.
The Respondent is a cash and carry
establishment that distributes typical
convenience store items including
tobacco products, candy, drinks and
health and beauty products. The
Respondent’s customers consist of
approximately 150 convenience stores
and gas stations located in the
Birmingham area, as well as Northern
Alabama, Georgia and Fort Lauderdale,
Florida.
DEA investigators asked Mr. Jiwani to
provide information on list I chemical
products the firm intended to carry. In
response to the request, Mr. Jiwani
provided a list of chemical products the
firm would distribute, including: Max
Brand 25/200 mg—60 count bottles;
Mini Thins 25/200 mg—60 count
bottles; Ephedrine 25/200 mg—60 count
bottles; Bio Tech Ephedrine 25/200
mg—60 count bottles; Ephedrine 25/200
mg Black—12 count packets; Tylenol
Cold, Tylenol Sinus and Tylenol Allergy
(no sizes listed); Advil Cold and Sinus
and Aleve Cold and Sinus (no sizes
listed); and Vicks Dayquil and Nyquil
(no sizes listed). Mr. Jiwani estimated
that these products would make up ten
to fifteen percent of Respondent’s total
sales.
Max Brand products have previously
been identified by DEA as the
‘‘precursor product predominantly
encountered and seized at clandestine
methamphetamine laboratories.’’ See
Express Wholesale, 69 FR 62086, 62087
(2004); see also, RAM, Inc. d/b/a
American Wholesale Distribution Corp.,
70 FR 11693 (2005). Convenience stores
are the ‘‘primary source’’ for the
purchase of Max Brand products, which
are the preferred brand for use by illicit
methamphetamine producers. See Elk
International, Inc., d/b/a Tri-City
Wholesale, 70 FR 24615 (2005).
Mr. Jiwani also informed DEA
investigators that he had no experience
handling list I chemical products. He
further stated that Respondent had no
procedure in place for identifying
suspicious or unusual purchases of list
I chemical products.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76865-76866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24509]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural Items: Thomas Burke
Memorial Washington State Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3005, of the
intent to repatriate cultural items in the possession of the Thomas
Burke Memorial Washington State Museum (Burke Museum), University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, that meet the definition of ``unassociated
funerary objects'' under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The
determinations in this notice are the sold responsibility of the
museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the cultural
items. The National Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
The 12 cultural items are 7 beaded necklaces (beads include glass
trade beads, shell beads, and copper beads), 1 bracelet, 3 sets of pipe
fragments, and 1 piece of twine.
At an unknown date, the 12 cultural items were removed from a small
island just upriver from Blalock Island in the lower Columbia River,
Benton County, WA, by Mr. John Tomaske, an archaeology graduate student
of the University of Washington. In 1960, the cultural items were
donated to the University of Washington Department of Anthropology, and
subsequently transferred to the Burke Museum and accessioned in 1973
(Burke Accn. 1973-8). Accession information indicated the
presence of burials at the site. According to Mr. Tomaske, the burials
had previously been disturbed and exhibited evidence of cremation. The
human remains are not in the possession of the Burke Museum.
The small island just upriver from Blalock Island described in
museum records could be Cook's Island, which was formerly recorded as
containing cremation burials. Archaeological evidence for Cook's Island
supports the presence of cremation burials. Cremation and burial on
islands in the Columbia River were customary practices of the Umatilla.
It was also the practice of the Umatilla that individuals were buried
with many of their personal belongings. The area surrounding Blalock
Island was heavily utilized by the Umatilla, including ama'amapa, which
served as a habitation area, burial site, and stronghold from enemies.
On Blalock Island, and along the Washington side of the Columbia River,
the Umatilla had a permanent camp, Yep-po-luc-sha (or Yep-po-kuc-sha),
as well as a fishing area.
Burial practices and funerary objects described are consistent with
historic practices of the present-day Confederated Tribes of the
Umatilla Reservation, Oregon. The area surrounding Blalock Island is
within the aboriginal territory of the Confederated Tribes of the
Umatilla Reservation, Oregon and the land claims boundaries of the
Indian Claims Commission decision of 1960.
Officials of the Burke Museum have determined that, pursuant to 25
U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the 12 cultural items described above are reasonably
believed to have been placed with or near individual human remains at
the time of death or later as part of the death rite or ceremony and
are believed, by a preponderance of the evidence, to have been removed
from a specific burial site of a Native American individual. Officials
of the Burke Museum also have determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.
3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be
reasonably traced between funerary objects and the Confederated Tribes
of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon.
Representatives of any other Indian tribe that believes itself to
be culturally affiliated with the unassociated funerary objects should
contact Dr. Peter Lape, Burke Museum, University of Washington, Box
353010, Seattle, WA 98195-3010, telephone (206) 685-2282, before
January 27, 2006. Repatriation of the unassociated funerary objects to
the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon may proceed
after that date if no additional claimants come forward.
[[Page 76866]]
The Burke Museum is responsible for notifying the Confederated
Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon that this notice has been
published.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 05-24509 Filed 12-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-M