Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 76445-76447 [E5-7852]
Download as PDF
bjneal on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2005 / Notices
2309, 2902, 2903, 2904, 2905, 2906,
2907, 2909, 2910, 2912, 2913, 2914,
2915, 2916, 2917, 2918, 2920, 2921,
2922, 2923, 2924, 2925, 2926, 2928,
2930, 2931, 2932, 2933, 2934, 2935,
2936, 2937, 2938, 2939, 2941, 2942,
3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3006, 3802,
3804, 3808, 3809, 3824, 3910, 3911,
3912, 3913, and 3914. Duty rates for
these products range from duty-free to
7.5%.
Zone procedures would exempt
Merck from Customs duty payments on
foreign materials used in production for
export. On domestic shipments, the
company would be able to defer
Customs duty payments on foreign
materials, and to choose the duty rate
that applies to finished products (dutyfree to 7.5 %) instead of the rates
otherwise applicable to the foreign
input materials (duty-free—20%). Merck
would also be able to avoid duty on
foreign inputs which become scrap/
waste, estimated at two percent of
foreign material. Merck may also realize
logistical/procedure and other benefits
from subzone status, including zone to
zone transfers between other Merck
subzones. The application indicates that
the savings from FTZ procedures would
help improve the international
competitiveness of Merck’s U.S.
operations.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, a member of the FTZ staff
has been designated examiner to
investigate the application and report to
the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at one of
the following addresses:
1. Submissions Via Express/Package
Delivery Services: Foreign-Trade Zones
Board, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Franklin Court Building—Suite 4100 W,
1099 14th St. NW., Washington, DC
20005; or
2. Submissions Via the U.S. Postal
Service: Foreign-Trade-Zones Board,
U.S. Department of Commerce, FCB—
Suite 4100W, 1401 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
The closing period for their receipt is
February 27, 2006. Rebuttal comments
in response to material submitted
during the foregoing period may be
submitted during the subsequent 15-day
period March 13, 2006.
A copy of the application and
accompanying exhibits will be available
for public inspection at the Office of the
Foreign-Trade Zones Board’s Executive
Secretary at address Number 1 listed
above, and at the U.S. Department of
Commerce Export Assistance Center,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:54 Dec 23, 2005
Jkt 208001
10900 World Trade Blvd., Suite 110,
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617.
Dated: December 16, 2005.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–24439 Filed 12–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 121905A]
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed Recovery Plan for the
Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of
Puget Sound Chinook Salmon
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability for public review of a
proposed Puget Sound Salmon Recovery
Plan (Plan) for the Evolutionarily
Significant Unit (ESU) of Puget Sound
Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha). This Plan consists of a
Draft Puget Sound Recovery Plan
prepared by the Shared Strategy (Shared
Strategy Plan) and a NMFS supplement
to the Shared Strategy Plan
(Supplement). NMFS is soliciting
review and comment on the proposed
Plan from the public and all interested
parties.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed Puget Sound Salmon Recovery
Plan closes on February 27, 2006. NMFS
will consider and address all
substantive comments received during
the comment period. Comments must be
received no later than 5 p.m. Pacific
Standard. A description of previous
public and scientific review, including
scientific peer review, can be found in
the NMFS Supplement.
ADDRESSES: Please send written
comments and materials to Elizabeth
Babcock, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Salmon Recovery Division,
7600 Sandpoint Way NE Seattle, WA
98115. Comments may be submitted by
e-mail. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments is
PugetSalmonPlan.nwr@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following identifier:
Comments on Puget Sound Salmon
Plan. Comments may also be submitted
via facsimile (fax) to 206–526–6426.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76445
Persons wishing to review the Plan,
can obtain an electronic copy (i.e., CDROM) from Carol Joyce by calling 503–
230–5408, or by e-mailing a request to
carol.joyce@noaa.gov, with the subject
line CD-ROM Request for Puget Sound
Salmon Plan. Electronic copies of the
Shared Strategy Plan are also available
on-line on the Shared Strategy website
www.sharedsalmonstrategy.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Babcock, NMFS Puget Sound
Salmon Recovery Coordinator (206–
526–4505), or Elizabeth Gaar, NMFS
Salmon Recovery Division (503–230–
5434).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species
listed under the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). The ESA requires that
recovery plans incorporate (1) objective,
measurable criteria which, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to
achieve the plan’s goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs
to implement recovery actions. The ESA
requires the development of recovery
plans for listed species unless such a
plan would not promote the recovery of
a particular species.
NMFS’ goal is to restore endangered
and threatened Pacific salmon ESUs to
the point where they are again secure,
self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems and no longer need the
protections of the ESA. NMFS believes
it is critically important to base its
recovery plans on the many state,
regional, tribal, local, and private
conservation efforts already underway
throughout the region. The agency’s
approach to recovery planning has been
to support and participate in locally led
collaborative efforts involving local
communities, state, tribal, and Federal
entities, and other stakeholders to
develop recovery plans.
On June 30, 2005, the Shared Strategy
for Puget Sound presented its locally
developed recovery plan (Shared
Strategy Plan) to NMFS. The Shared
Strategy is a nonprofit organization
founded in 1999 to coordinate recovery
planning for Puget Sound salmonids. It
includes representatives of Federal,
state, tribal, and local governments,
business, agriculture and forestry
industries, conservation and
environmental groups, and local
watershed planning groups. The Shared
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
76446
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2005 / Notices
bjneal on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Strategy Plan is based on individual
watershed recovery plans put together
by groups and local governments in 14
watershed planning areas.
By endorsing a locally developed
recovery plan, NMFS is making a
commitment to implement the actions
in it for which we have authority, to
work cooperatively on implementation
of other actions, and to encourage other
Federal agencies to implement plan
actions for which they have
responsibility and authority. We will
also encourage the State of Washington
to seek similar implementation
commitments from state agencies and
local governments. NMFS expects the
Plan to help NMFS and other Federal
agencies take a more consistent
approach to future interagency
consultations required by section 7 of
the ESA. For example, the Plan will
provide greater biological context for the
effects that a proposed action may have
on the listed ESU. This context will be
enhanced by adding recovery plan
science to the ‘‘best available
information’’ for section 7 consultations.
Such information includes viability
criteria for the ESU and its independent
populations; better understanding of
and information on limiting factors and
threats facing the ESU; better
information on priority areas for
addressing specific limiting factors; and
better geographic context for where the
ESU can tolerate varying levels of risk.
After review of the Shared Strategy
Plan, NMFS has added a Supplement,
which describes how the Shared
Strategy Plan satisfies ESA recovery
plan requirements, including
qualifications and additional actions
that NMFS believes are necessary to
support recovery, and describes the
agency’s intent to use the Shared
Strategy Plan as an ESA recovery plan
for the Puget Sound. The Plan
(including the Shared Strategy Plan and
NMFS supplement) is now available for
public review and comment. As noted
above, it is available at the Shared
Strategy website,
www.sharedsalmonstrategy.com, and
the NMFS Northwest Region Salmon
Recovery Division website,
www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-RecoveryPlanning/ESA-Recovery-Plans/DraftPlans.cfm. NMFS will consider all
substantive comments and information
presented during the public comment
period (see DATES).
ESU Addressed and Planning Area
The Plan covers the range of the Puget
Sound Chinook Salmon ESU
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), listed as
threatened on March 24, 1999 (64 FR
14307). The area covered by the Plan is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:54 Dec 23, 2005
Jkt 208001
the 16,000–square-mile Puget Sound
Basin, the second largest estuary in the
United States. It encompasses twenty
major river systems originating in the
Cascade mountain range to the east and
the Olympic mountain range to the
west. The recovery planning area ends
at the Canadian border, but includes the
San Juan Islands. The Plan focuses on
the recovery of Puget Sound Chinook
salmon. Many of the actions identified
in the Plan will also benefit Hood Canal
summer chum salmon, whose
geographic range is contained within a
portion of the range of Puget Sound
Chinook salmon, and bull trout, whose
geographic range includes, but is more
extensive than, that of Puget Sound
Chinook salmon. A draft recovery plan
prepared specifically for the Hood Canal
Summer-run Chum Salmon ESU was
prepared by the Hood Canal
Coordinating Council, a regional council
of governments, and delivered to NMFS
and the State of Washington in
November 2005 for review through a
separate process. NMFS has begun
reviewing that plan and will present its
findings for public review in early 2006.
As the lead ESA agency for Chinook
salmon, NMFS is responsible for
reviewing these locally produced
recovery plans and deciding whether
adoption is merited. The geographic
area covered by the Plan also
encompasses the entire range of the
Puget Sound Steelhead ESU
(Oncorhynchus mykiss). NMFS is
currently reviewing the status of this
ESU under the ESA. The Puget Sound
steelhead ESU is not currently listed or
proposed for listing. At this time, NMFS
is not considering benefits of salmon
recovery measures proposed in this Plan
for Puget Sound steelhead populations,
but may do so in the future.
The Plan
The Plan incorporates the NMFS
viable salmonid population (VSP)
framework as a basis for biological
status assessments and recovery goals
for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. The
Plan also incorporates the work of the
Puget Sound Technical Recovery Team
(PSTRT) appointed by NMFS, which
provided recommendations on
biological criteria for population and
ESU viability. The PSTRT set forth
scientific conditions that would indicate
a high probability of persistence into the
future for Puget Sound salmon. The
current status of the populations in each
watershed was derived through local
assessments in consultation with the
PSTRT and state and tribal co-managers.
The PSTRT review of the Plan is
available at www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recovery-Planning/ESA-RecoveryPlans/TRT-Review.cfm.
In general, based on updated status
evaluations considering the four VSP
parameters of abundance, population
growth rate, genetic and life history
diversity, and spatial structure, the Plan
concludes that all of the remaining 22
independent populations of Chinook
salmon in Puget Sound are at high risk.
Overall abundance has declined
substantially from historical levels,
many populations are small enough that
genetic and demographic risks are likely
to be relatively high, and spatial
structure and diversity have been
greatly decreased.
The Plan provides a roadmap for
implementation of recovery actions in
the Puget Sound Basin of Washington
State. It identifies threats to the Puget
Sound Chinook Salmon ESU, includes
actions intended to address all the
manageable threats, and includes
recovery goals and measurable criteria
consistent with the ESA. The Plan’s
initial approach is to target reductions
in all manageable threats and to
improve the status of all 22 populations
of the ESU. As monitoring and
evaluation improve our understanding
of the effectiveness of various actions
and their benefits throughout the life
cycle of salmon and steelhead,
adjustments may be made through the
adaptive management framework
described in the Plan (see
www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-RecoveryPlanning/ESA-Recovery-Plans/
Adaptive-Mngmnt.cfm).
A combination of habitat loss and
degradation, harvest, hatchery
production of salmon and steelhead,
hydropower facility construction and
operation, and ecological changes have
resulted in reduced viability of the
Puget Sound Chinook and its eventual
listing under the ESA.
The Plan identifies the following key
threats to the ESU and recovery actions
to reduce them:
1. Habitat: Human activities have
altered habitat-forming processes, such
as sediment transport, hydrology,
organic matter deposition, nutrient and
chemical inputs, temperature and light,
floodplain dynamics, riparian function,
and nearshore dynamics. Major changes
in land use have resulted in altered
watershed function and extensive
degradation of riparian areas,
floodplains, and stream habitat.
Intertidal habitat has declined by 80
percent and extensive industrial
development and armoring of shoreline
have reduced juvenile rearing and
migration areas as well as food sources
for salmon. Several major dams block
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
bjneal on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 27, 2005 / Notices
access to historic Chinook salmon
spawning and rearing habitat.
2. Harvest: The Plan reviews the
history and effects of commercial and
recreational harvest on Puget Sound
Chinook and notes that harvest today is
managed under the following major
management forums: the Pacific Salmon
Commission, the Pacific Fisheries
Management Council, and the Federal
court proceedings of U.S. v.
Washington. Current management
objectives emphasize survival and
recovery of wild salmon populations.
3. Hatcheries: The Plan reviews risks
to the listed ESU from hatchery
production, which include genetic
effects that reduce fitness and survival,
ecological effects such as competition
and predation, facility effects on passage
and water quality, mixed stock fishery
effects, and masking the true status of
naturally produced fish. The Plan
describes recent efforts toward hatchery
reform and refers to the Chinook
Hatchery Resource Management Plan
and NMFS’ Chinook Hatchery and
Genetic Management Plans for actions
to help recover natural populations and
reconfigure production-based hatchery
programs to minimize impacts on
natural populations.
4. Additional Factors: The Plan
reviews the following additional factors
that affect Puget Sound salmon: global
climate change, fluctuating ocean
cycles, and marine mammal
interactions. These considerations
further support recovery actions to
protect and restore local habitat
conditions as a buffer against largerscale changes.
5. Integration across all the Hs
(Habitat, Harvest, Hatcheries): The Plan
states that recovery will depend on
integrating actions that address habitat,
harvest, and hatcheries and working
together to adjust approaches and
actions over time as population
conditions change. The Plan calls for
advancing the work on all-H integration
in the first years of plan
implementation.
The Plan identifies substantive
actions needed to achieve recovery by
addressing the threats to the species.
The Plan also incorporates an adaptive
management framework by which Plan
actions and other elements will evolve
and adapt to information gained as a
result of monitoring and evaluation. The
Plan anticipates that future actions will
be influenced by additional analysis of
costs and effectiveness of recovery
actions to maximize efficiency.
The long-term goal is to achieve
viable salmonid populations, i.e. to
achieve self-sustaining populations of
Puget Sound Chinook salmon in terms
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:54 Dec 23, 2005
Jkt 208001
of abundance, productivity, spatial
distribution, and diversity.
Because of the complexity and extent
of the changes necessary to reach the
recovery targets and the technical and
policy uncertainties associated with the
long term, policymakers chose to focus
on developing a ten-year work plan
within the context of the overall
recovery need, while recognizing that
recovery could take much longer. Since
the existing 22 independent Puget
Sound Chinook salmon populations are
currently at high risk of extinction, the
short-term goal is to improve conditions
for all the populations and to get on a
trajectory toward recovery early in
implementation. Additional goals in
this timeframe include implementing
and evaluating the set of short-term
strategies and priority actions identified;
gaining a preliminary view of the status
and trends of important recovery
indicators; and making mid-course
corrections as needed. In ten years,
watershed and regional leaders will put
forward the next set of strategies and
actions toward achieving the long-term
goal.
An implementation schedule is
incorporated into the Plan. The first step
involves further coordination among the
Shared Strategy, local watershed groups,
and various decision makers and
responsible entities to develop an
adaptive management and monitoring
program that is integrated at the
watershed and regional level.
Public Comments Solicited
NMFS solicits written comments on
the proposed Recovery Plan, including
the Shared Strategy Plan and the
Supplement. The Supplement states
NMFS’ assessment of the Shared
Strategy Plan’s relationship to ESA
requirements for recovery plans and
specifies recovery (de-listing) criteria for
the ESU. The Supplement also explains
the agency’s intent to use the Shared
Strategy Plan to guide and prioritize
Federal recovery actions in the ESU and
to ultimately adopt the Shared Strategy
Plan as a final ESA recovery plan for the
ESU. All substantive comments received
by the date specified above will be
considered prior to NMFS’ decision
whether to endorse the Plan as a final
recovery plan. Additionally, NMFS will
provide a summary of the comments
and responses and notice of the final
Plan. NMFS seeks comments
particularly in the following areas: (1)
the analysis of limiting factors and
threats; (2) the recovery strategies and
measures; (3) the criteria for removing
the ESU from the Federal list of
endangered and threatened wildlife and
plants; and (4) meeting the ESA
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76447
requirement for estimates of time and
cost to implement recovery actions by
soliciting implementation schedules.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: December 20, 2005.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Division of Endangered Species, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E5–7852 Filed 12–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 111505A]
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Extension of Public Scoping Period for
Intersector Groundfish Allocations
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Extension of public scoping
period for an environmental impact
statement (EIS); request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
announce their intent to extend the
public scoping period for an EIS in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969 to analyze proposals to allocate
groundfish among various sectors of the
non-tribal Pacific Coast groundfish
fishery.
Public scoping meetings will be
announced in the Federal Register at a
later date. Written comments will be
accepted at the Pacific Council office
through May 24, 2006. Written and oral
comments will be accepted at the
Pacific Council meeting in Foster City,
CA from Sunday June 11 through
Friday, June 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
on issues and alternatives, identified by
111505A by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail:
##GFAllocationEIS.nwr@noaa.gov.
Include [111505A and enter ‘‘Scoping
Comments’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Fax: 503–820–2299.
• Mail: Dr. Donald McIsaac, Pacific
Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE.
Ambassador Pl., Suite 200, Portland, OR
97220.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76445-76447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7852]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 121905A]
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed Recovery Plan for the Evolutionarily Significant Unit
(ESU) of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces the
availability for public review of a proposed Puget Sound Salmon
Recovery Plan (Plan) for the Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of
Puget Sound Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). This Plan
consists of a Draft Puget Sound Recovery Plan prepared by the Shared
Strategy (Shared Strategy Plan) and a NMFS supplement to the Shared
Strategy Plan (Supplement). NMFS is soliciting review and comment on
the proposed Plan from the public and all interested parties.
DATES: The comment period for the proposed Puget Sound Salmon Recovery
Plan closes on February 27, 2006. NMFS will consider and address all
substantive comments received during the comment period. Comments must
be received no later than 5 p.m. Pacific Standard. A description of
previous public and scientific review, including scientific peer
review, can be found in the NMFS Supplement.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments and materials to Elizabeth
Babcock, National Marine Fisheries Service, Salmon Recovery Division,
7600 Sandpoint Way NE Seattle, WA 98115. Comments may be submitted by
e-mail. The mailbox address for providing e-mail comments is
PugetSalmonPlan.nwr@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line of the e-mail
comment the following identifier: Comments on Puget Sound Salmon Plan.
Comments may also be submitted via facsimile (fax) to 206-526-6426.
Persons wishing to review the Plan, can obtain an electronic copy
(i.e., CD-ROM) from Carol Joyce by calling 503-230-5408, or by e-
mailing a request to carol.joyce@noaa.gov, with the subject line CD-ROM
Request for Puget Sound Salmon Plan. Electronic copies of the Shared
Strategy Plan are also available on-line on the Shared Strategy website
www.sharedsalmonstrategy.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Babcock, NMFS Puget Sound
Salmon Recovery Coordinator (206-526-4505), or Elizabeth Gaar, NMFS
Salmon Recovery Division (503-230-5434).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species listed under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The ESA
requires that recovery plans incorporate (1) objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery actions.
The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for listed species
unless such a plan would not promote the recovery of a particular
species.
NMFS' goal is to restore endangered and threatened Pacific salmon
ESUs to the point where they are again secure, self-sustaining members
of their ecosystems and no longer need the protections of the ESA. NMFS
believes it is critically important to base its recovery plans on the
many state, regional, tribal, local, and private conservation efforts
already underway throughout the region. The agency's approach to
recovery planning has been to support and participate in locally led
collaborative efforts involving local communities, state, tribal, and
Federal entities, and other stakeholders to develop recovery plans.
On June 30, 2005, the Shared Strategy for Puget Sound presented its
locally developed recovery plan (Shared Strategy Plan) to NMFS. The
Shared Strategy is a nonprofit organization founded in 1999 to
coordinate recovery planning for Puget Sound salmonids. It includes
representatives of Federal, state, tribal, and local governments,
business, agriculture and forestry industries, conservation and
environmental groups, and local watershed planning groups. The Shared
[[Page 76446]]
Strategy Plan is based on individual watershed recovery plans put
together by groups and local governments in 14 watershed planning
areas.
By endorsing a locally developed recovery plan, NMFS is making a
commitment to implement the actions in it for which we have authority,
to work cooperatively on implementation of other actions, and to
encourage other Federal agencies to implement plan actions for which
they have responsibility and authority. We will also encourage the
State of Washington to seek similar implementation commitments from
state agencies and local governments. NMFS expects the Plan to help
NMFS and other Federal agencies take a more consistent approach to
future interagency consultations required by section 7 of the ESA. For
example, the Plan will provide greater biological context for the
effects that a proposed action may have on the listed ESU. This context
will be enhanced by adding recovery plan science to the ``best
available information'' for section 7 consultations. Such information
includes viability criteria for the ESU and its independent
populations; better understanding of and information on limiting
factors and threats facing the ESU; better information on priority
areas for addressing specific limiting factors; and better geographic
context for where the ESU can tolerate varying levels of risk.
After review of the Shared Strategy Plan, NMFS has added a
Supplement, which describes how the Shared Strategy Plan satisfies ESA
recovery plan requirements, including qualifications and additional
actions that NMFS believes are necessary to support recovery, and
describes the agency's intent to use the Shared Strategy Plan as an ESA
recovery plan for the Puget Sound. The Plan (including the Shared
Strategy Plan and NMFS supplement) is now available for public review
and comment. As noted above, it is available at the Shared Strategy
website, www.sharedsalmonstrategy.com, and the NMFS Northwest Region
Salmon Recovery Division website, www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-
Planning/ESA-Recovery-Plans/Draft-Plans.cfm. NMFS will consider all
substantive comments and information presented during the public
comment period (see DATES).
ESU Addressed and Planning Area
The Plan covers the range of the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), listed as threatened on March 24, 1999 (64
FR 14307). The area covered by the Plan is the 16,000-square-mile Puget
Sound Basin, the second largest estuary in the United States. It
encompasses twenty major river systems originating in the Cascade
mountain range to the east and the Olympic mountain range to the west.
The recovery planning area ends at the Canadian border, but includes
the San Juan Islands. The Plan focuses on the recovery of Puget Sound
Chinook salmon. Many of the actions identified in the Plan will also
benefit Hood Canal summer chum salmon, whose geographic range is
contained within a portion of the range of Puget Sound Chinook salmon,
and bull trout, whose geographic range includes, but is more extensive
than, that of Puget Sound Chinook salmon. A draft recovery plan
prepared specifically for the Hood Canal Summer-run Chum Salmon ESU was
prepared by the Hood Canal Coordinating Council, a regional council of
governments, and delivered to NMFS and the State of Washington in
November 2005 for review through a separate process. NMFS has begun
reviewing that plan and will present its findings for public review in
early 2006. As the lead ESA agency for Chinook salmon, NMFS is
responsible for reviewing these locally produced recovery plans and
deciding whether adoption is merited. The geographic area covered by
the Plan also encompasses the entire range of the Puget Sound Steelhead
ESU (Oncorhynchus mykiss). NMFS is currently reviewing the status of
this ESU under the ESA. The Puget Sound steelhead ESU is not currently
listed or proposed for listing. At this time, NMFS is not considering
benefits of salmon recovery measures proposed in this Plan for Puget
Sound steelhead populations, but may do so in the future.
The Plan
The Plan incorporates the NMFS viable salmonid population (VSP)
framework as a basis for biological status assessments and recovery
goals for Puget Sound Chinook salmon. The Plan also incorporates the
work of the Puget Sound Technical Recovery Team (PSTRT) appointed by
NMFS, which provided recommendations on biological criteria for
population and ESU viability. The PSTRT set forth scientific conditions
that would indicate a high probability of persistence into the future
for Puget Sound salmon. The current status of the populations in each
watershed was derived through local assessments in consultation with
the PSTRT and state and tribal co-managers. The PSTRT review of the
Plan is available at www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-Planning/ESA-
Recovery-Plans/TRT-Review.cfm.
In general, based on updated status evaluations considering the
four VSP parameters of abundance, population growth rate, genetic and
life history diversity, and spatial structure, the Plan concludes that
all of the remaining 22 independent populations of Chinook salmon in
Puget Sound are at high risk. Overall abundance has declined
substantially from historical levels, many populations are small enough
that genetic and demographic risks are likely to be relatively high,
and spatial structure and diversity have been greatly decreased.
The Plan provides a roadmap for implementation of recovery actions
in the Puget Sound Basin of Washington State. It identifies threats to
the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU, includes actions intended to
address all the manageable threats, and includes recovery goals and
measurable criteria consistent with the ESA. The Plan's initial
approach is to target reductions in all manageable threats and to
improve the status of all 22 populations of the ESU. As monitoring and
evaluation improve our understanding of the effectiveness of various
actions and their benefits throughout the life cycle of salmon and
steelhead, adjustments may be made through the adaptive management
framework described in the Plan (see www.nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-
Planning/ESA-Recovery-Plans/Adaptive-Mngmnt.cfm).
A combination of habitat loss and degradation, harvest, hatchery
production of salmon and steelhead, hydropower facility construction
and operation, and ecological changes have resulted in reduced
viability of the Puget Sound Chinook and its eventual listing under the
ESA.
The Plan identifies the following key threats to the ESU and
recovery actions to reduce them:
1. Habitat: Human activities have altered habitat-forming
processes, such as sediment transport, hydrology, organic matter
deposition, nutrient and chemical inputs, temperature and light,
floodplain dynamics, riparian function, and nearshore dynamics. Major
changes in land use have resulted in altered watershed function and
extensive degradation of riparian areas, floodplains, and stream
habitat. Intertidal habitat has declined by 80 percent and extensive
industrial development and armoring of shoreline have reduced juvenile
rearing and migration areas as well as food sources for salmon. Several
major dams block
[[Page 76447]]
access to historic Chinook salmon spawning and rearing habitat.
2. Harvest: The Plan reviews the history and effects of commercial
and recreational harvest on Puget Sound Chinook and notes that harvest
today is managed under the following major management forums: the
Pacific Salmon Commission, the Pacific Fisheries Management Council,
and the Federal court proceedings of U.S. v. Washington. Current
management objectives emphasize survival and recovery of wild salmon
populations.
3. Hatcheries: The Plan reviews risks to the listed ESU from
hatchery production, which include genetic effects that reduce fitness
and survival, ecological effects such as competition and predation,
facility effects on passage and water quality, mixed stock fishery
effects, and masking the true status of naturally produced fish. The
Plan describes recent efforts toward hatchery reform and refers to the
Chinook Hatchery Resource Management Plan and NMFS' Chinook Hatchery
and Genetic Management Plans for actions to help recover natural
populations and reconfigure production-based hatchery programs to
minimize impacts on natural populations.
4. Additional Factors: The Plan reviews the following additional
factors that affect Puget Sound salmon: global climate change,
fluctuating ocean cycles, and marine mammal interactions. These
considerations further support recovery actions to protect and restore
local habitat conditions as a buffer against larger-scale changes.
5. Integration across all the Hs (Habitat, Harvest, Hatcheries):
The Plan states that recovery will depend on integrating actions that
address habitat, harvest, and hatcheries and working together to adjust
approaches and actions over time as population conditions change. The
Plan calls for advancing the work on all-H integration in the first
years of plan implementation.
The Plan identifies substantive actions needed to achieve recovery
by addressing the threats to the species. The Plan also incorporates an
adaptive management framework by which Plan actions and other elements
will evolve and adapt to information gained as a result of monitoring
and evaluation. The Plan anticipates that future actions will be
influenced by additional analysis of costs and effectiveness of
recovery actions to maximize efficiency.
The long-term goal is to achieve viable salmonid populations, i.e.
to achieve self-sustaining populations of Puget Sound Chinook salmon in
terms of abundance, productivity, spatial distribution, and diversity.
Because of the complexity and extent of the changes necessary to
reach the recovery targets and the technical and policy uncertainties
associated with the long term, policymakers chose to focus on
developing a ten-year work plan within the context of the overall
recovery need, while recognizing that recovery could take much longer.
Since the existing 22 independent Puget Sound Chinook salmon
populations are currently at high risk of extinction, the short-term
goal is to improve conditions for all the populations and to get on a
trajectory toward recovery early in implementation. Additional goals in
this timeframe include implementing and evaluating the set of short-
term strategies and priority actions identified; gaining a preliminary
view of the status and trends of important recovery indicators; and
making mid-course corrections as needed. In ten years, watershed and
regional leaders will put forward the next set of strategies and
actions toward achieving the long-term goal.
An implementation schedule is incorporated into the Plan. The first
step involves further coordination among the Shared Strategy, local
watershed groups, and various decision makers and responsible entities
to develop an adaptive management and monitoring program that is
integrated at the watershed and regional level.
Public Comments Solicited
NMFS solicits written comments on the proposed Recovery Plan,
including the Shared Strategy Plan and the Supplement. The Supplement
states NMFS' assessment of the Shared Strategy Plan's relationship to
ESA requirements for recovery plans and specifies recovery (de-listing)
criteria for the ESU. The Supplement also explains the agency's intent
to use the Shared Strategy Plan to guide and prioritize Federal
recovery actions in the ESU and to ultimately adopt the Shared Strategy
Plan as a final ESA recovery plan for the ESU. All substantive comments
received by the date specified above will be considered prior to NMFS'
decision whether to endorse the Plan as a final recovery plan.
Additionally, NMFS will provide a summary of the comments and responses
and notice of the final Plan. NMFS seeks comments particularly in the
following areas: (1) the analysis of limiting factors and threats; (2)
the recovery strategies and measures; (3) the criteria for removing the
ESU from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife and
plants; and (4) meeting the ESA requirement for estimates of time and
cost to implement recovery actions by soliciting implementation
schedules.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: December 20, 2005.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Division of Endangered Species, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E5-7852 Filed 12-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S