Accreditation of Service Organization Representatives and Agents, 76221-76224 [E5-7759]
Download as PDF
76221
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 70, No. 246
Friday, December 23, 2005
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
accomplish the stated purpose or
intended effect. Accordingly, VA is
withdrawing the proposal and is
developing a new proposal, which it
intends to publish at a later date.
Approved: December 14, 2005.
R. James Nicholson,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. E5–7758 Filed 12–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
38 CFR Parts 3 and 4
RIN 2900–AH21
Total Disability Ratings Based on
Inability of the Individual To Engage in
Substantially Gainful Employment
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 14
Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In a document published in
the Federal Register at 66 FR 49886 on
October 1, 2001, the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to
amend those portions of its adjudication
regulations and its Schedule for Rating
Disabilities dealing with the issue of
total disability ratings based on inability
of the individual to engage in
substantially gainful employment in
claims for service-connected
compensation or non-service-connected
pension. This document withdraws that
proposed rule.
DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn
as of December 23, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth
Easter, Consultant, Policy and
Regulations Staff, Compensation and
Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, telephone
(202) 273–7141.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of VA’s notice of proposed
rulemaking was to clarify the
procedures and substantive standards
for determining whether a veteran’s
disabilities, although they do not meet
the schedular requirements for a total
disability rating, nonetheless prevent
him or her from engaging in
substantially gainful employment. The
intended effect of the rulemaking was to
ensure consistency of decisions
concerning claims for total disability
ratings based upon individual
unemployability. VA has carefully
considered the issues relating to the
payment of benefits under the proposed
rule and determined that it does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Dec 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
RIN 2900–AM29
Accreditation of Service Organization
Representatives and Agents
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing accreditation of
representatives of claimants for
veterans’ benefits. These proposed
changes would require that recognized
organizations periodically recertify the
qualifications of accredited
representatives, and require that VA is
notified when a recognized organization
requests cancellation of a
representative’s accreditation based
upon misconduct or lack of competence,
or if a representative resigns to avoid
cancellation of accreditation for
misconduct or lack of competence. The
proposed changes would also require
that accredited claims agents
periodically reestablish their good
character and reputation and
qualifications to assist claimants for VA
benefits. We would also clarify that the
authority to cancel accreditation
includes the authority to suspend
accreditation for a period of time. The
purpose of these proposed changes is to
ensure that claimants for veterans’
benefits have responsible, qualified
representation in the preparation,
presentation, and prosecution of claims.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by: mail or hand-delivery to
Director, Regulations Management
(00REG1), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Room
1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(202) 273–9026; e-mail through
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AM29.’’ All
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management,
Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday (except holidays). Please call
(202) 273–9515 for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Staff Attorney,
Office of General Counsel (022G),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 273–6315. (This is not a
toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
5902 of title 38, United States Code,
authorizes the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs to recognize representatives of
approved organizations for the
preparation, presentation, and
prosecution of claims under laws
administered by the Secretary. Section
5904 of title 38, United States Code,
authorizes the Secretary to recognize
any individual as an agent or attorney
for the preparation, presentation, and
prosecution of claims under laws
administered by the Secretary. It further
authorizes the Secretary to require such
individuals to show that they are of
good moral character and in good
repute, are qualified to render claimants
valuable service, and otherwise are
competent to assist claimants in
presenting claims as a prerequisite to
recognition. Section 5901 of title 38,
United States Code, prohibits an
individual from acting as an agent or
attorney in the preparation,
presentation, or prosecution of any
claim under laws administered by the
Secretary, unless such individual has
been recognized for such purposes by
the Secretary. The purpose of the
regulation of representatives is to assure
that claimants for Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits have
responsible, qualified representation in
the preparation, presentation, and
prosecution of claims for such benefits.
See 38 CFR 14.626.
The Secretary has promulgated
regulations specifying criteria that must
be met for an individual to be approved
as an accredited representative through
a recognized organization or as an
accredited claims agent. Pursuant to 38
CFR 14.629(a), recognized organizations
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
76222
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
must certify that each prospective
representative is of good character and
reputation and has demonstrated an
ability to represent claimants. In
addition, the organization must certify
that the prospective representative is a
member in good standing or paid
employee of the organization or
accredited and functioning as a
representative of another recognized
organization. Individuals desiring
accreditation as an agent must establish
their good character and reputation and
qualifications to assist claimants in the
preparation of their claims under 38
CFR 14.629(b). They must file a specific
application (VA Form 21a) containing
particular information and achieve a
passing score on a written VA
examination. If, subsequent to having
been certified or accredited, a
representative or agent fails to meet any
of these criteria, they would no longer
be qualified to represent claimants for
veterans’ benefits.
After a period of time, a
representative may no longer have the
requisite ties to the certifying
organization through membership or
employment to qualify as an accredited
representative, the representative may
not have maintained the skills required
for effective representation, or
information may have come to light
concerning the representative’s
competence or character. Similarly, an
agent may not have maintained the
skills, competence, or good character
required to assist claimants.
Consequently, we propose to require
that recognized organizations
periodically recertify the qualifications
of the accredited representatives of the
organization and that agents reestablish
their character, reputation and
qualifications to assist VA benefits
claimants by refiling VA Form 21a and
retaking the written examination.
Recertification of representatives would
be accomplished using the same VA
Form 21 that is currently used for
requests for accreditation, except that
only the certifying official of the
recognized organization, not the
individual representatives, would be
required to sign the form for purposes
of recertification. The organization
would file the form with the VA Office
of General Counsel not later than five
years after initial accreditation of the
representative by VA or the most recent
recertification of the representative by
the organization. Thus, as an initial
requirement under this rule, recognized
organizations would be required to
recertify the character and qualifications
of any representative that received VA
accreditation five or more years before
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Dec 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
the effective date of the rule.
Recertification will ensure that
claimants for VA benefits continue to
have responsible, qualified
representation. Requiring recertification
every five years strikes an appropriate
balance between the need to assure
continuing qualifications and the need
to avoid unnecessary paperwork for
organizations and the Department.
Pursuant to 38 CFR 14.633(a), VA may
cancel the accreditation of a
representative at the request of the
organization that certified the
individual to VA. Under current
regulations, when an organization
requests that VA cancel the
accreditation of one of its
representative’s, the organization need
not disclose the reason for requesting
cancellation. Individuals may be
accredited through more than one
organization, and when one
organization requests cancellation of a
representative’s accreditation for cause,
such as misconduct or incompetence, it
is desirable that VA and the other
organization or organizations through
which the individual is accredited know
the basis for the cancellation, so that
they may determine whether the
individual should remain accredited
through the other organization or
organizations. Further, the individual
may later seek accreditation through
another organization, and this
information would be valuable to VA in
determining whether to approve the
accreditation.
Therefore, we propose to add a
requirement to 38 CFR 14.633(a) that
any recognized organization requesting
that a particular representative’s
accreditation be cancelled inform VA if
the reason for such request for
cancellation is misconduct or lack of
competence on the part of the
representative or resignation of the
representative to avoid cancellation of
accreditation for misconduct or lack of
competence. Only if VA learns of any
improper conduct or incompetence on
the part of an accredited representative
can it investigate and, if necessary, take
action to terminate accreditation
through other organizations to assure
that claimants have responsible,
qualified representation.
In addition, we propose to clarify that
the authority to cancel accreditation
includes the authority to suspend
accreditation for a period of time. We
consider our current authority to cancel
accreditation to include the lesser
sanction of suspension, and this
amendment would make that clear.
Suspension may be appropriate in cases
involving extenuating circumstances or
where misconduct is not so severe as to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
warrant the harsher penalty of
permanently canceling the authority to
represent claimants.
Finally, we propose to remove the
requirement in 38 CFR 14.633 that we
maintain records for three years in a
case that has been under inquiry or
when accreditation has been canceled or
suspended because we do not limit our
maintenance of such records.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection requirements included in this
proposed regulation are revisions of
existing collections under Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
No. 2900–0018, which pertains to the
application for accreditation as a service
organization representative, and OMB
Control No. 2900–0605, which pertains
to the application for accreditation as a
claims agent. Comments on the
information collections included in this
proposed rule should be submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503, with copies sent
by mail or hand delivery to the Director,
Regulations Management (00REG1)),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW, Room 1068,
Washington, DC 20420; fax to (202)
273–9026; e-mail through
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AM29,’’ and
must be received on or before February
21, 2006.
Comments by the public on proposed
collections of information will help VA
in—
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collections of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
OMB assigns control numbers to
collections of information it approves.
VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Title: Accreditation of Service
Organization Representatives and
Agents.
Summary of collection of information:
• Section 14.629(a)—Under this
section, VA requires the individual and
organization seeking accreditation to
provide basic information
demonstrating eligibility for
accreditation and VA requires the
sponsoring recognized organization to
certify that the individual is of good
character and is qualified to present
claims. VA proposes to require
recognized veterans service
organizations to recertify the
qualifications of accredited
representatives of the organization every
five years.
• Section 14.629(b)—Under this
section, VA requires individuals seeking
accreditation to establish their good
character, reputation, and qualifications
to present claims. VA proposes to
require agents to reestablish their good
character and qualifications by filing VA
Form 21a and passing a written VA
examination every five years.
• Section 14.633(a)—Under this
section, VA proposes to require
recognized veterans service
organizations to inform VA of the reason
for a request to cancel a representative’s
accreditation under certain
circumstances.
Description of need for information
and proposed use of information: The
collections of information are necessary
to ensure that claimants for VA benefits
have responsible, qualified
representation in the preparation,
presentation, and prosecution of claims.
VA will use this information to
determine whether particular
individuals are qualified to represent
claimants before VA.
Description of likely respondents:
Individuals applying for accreditation as
agents and service organization
representatives and recognized service
organizations that request accreditation
of representatives or that have
representatives accredited to represent
claimants for VA benefits.
Estimated number of respondents: For
recertifications under 38 CFR 14.629(a),
we anticipate receiving 2,360 responses
in fiscal year 2006. For recertifications
under 38 CFR 14.629(b), we anticipate
receiving 8 responses in fiscal year
2006. Under 38 CFR 14.633(a), we
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Dec 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
anticipate receiving no more than 20
responses in fiscal year 2006.
Estimated frequency of responses: For
recertifications under 38 CFR 14.629(a)
and (b), once every five years. Under 38
CFR 14.633(a), on occasion.
Estimated average burden per
response: For recertifications under 38
CFR 14.629(a), 10 minutes. Under 38
CFR 14.629(b), 10 minutes. Under 38
CFR 14.633(a), 30 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting
burden: For recertifications under 38
CFR 14.629(a), 393 hours in fiscal year
2006. Under 38 CFR 14.629(b), no more
than 2 hours in fiscal year 2006. Under
38 CFR 14.633(a), 10 hours in fiscal year
2006.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
VA has examined the economic
implications of this proposed rule as
required by Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 12866 classifies a rule
as significant if it meets any one of a
number of specified conditions,
including: having an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million, adversely
affecting a sector of the economy in a
material way, adversely affecting
competition, or adversely affecting jobs.
A regulation is also considered a
significant regulatory action if it raises
novel legal or policy issues.
VA concludes that this proposed rule
is a significant regulatory action under
the Executive Order since it raises novel
legal and policy issues under Section
3(f)(4). VA concludes, however, that this
proposed rule does not meet the
significance threshold of $100 million
effect on the economy in any one year
under Section 3(f)(1). VA requests
comments regarding this determination,
and invites commenters to submit any
relevant data that will assist the agency
in estimating the impact of this
rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. This
proposed rule would affect the 87
veterans service organizations and 42
agents recognized by VA to represent
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76223
benefit claimants. However, it would
not have a significant economic impact
on these organizations because it would
only impose reporting requirements the
costs of which would not be significant.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
this amendment is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers
There are no Federal Domestic
Assistance programs associated with
this proposal.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 14
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Courts, Foreign
relations, Government employees,
Lawyers, Legal services, Organization
and functions (Government agencies),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Surety bonds, Trusts and
trustees, Veterans.
Approved: September 12, 2005.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 14 as follows:
PART 14—LEGAL SERVICES,
GENERAL COUNSEL, AND
MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS
1. The authority citation for part 14
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 2671–
2680; 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 512, 515, 5502, 5902–
5905; 28 CFR part 14, appendix to part 14,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Revise § 14.629(a) introductory text,
(b)(1) introductory text, and (b)(2) to
read as follows:
§ 14.629 Requirements for accreditation of
service organization representatives;
agents; and attorneys.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Service Organization
Representatives. A recognized
organization shall file with the Office of
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
76224
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 246 / Friday, December 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules
the General Counsel VA Form 21
(Application for Accreditation as
Service Organization Representative) for
each person it desires accredited as a
representative of that organization. For
each of its accredited representatives, a
recognized organization shall complete
and file with the Office of the General
Counsel, not later than five years after
initial accreditation through that
organization or the most recent
recertification by that organization, VA
Form 21 to certify that the
representative continues to meet the
criteria for accreditation specified in
paragraph (a)(1), (2) and (3) of this
section. In recommending a person, the
organization shall certify that the
designee:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * (1) An individual desiring
accreditation as an agent must establish
and demonstrate that he or she is of
good character and reputation and is
qualified to render assistance to
claimants in the presentation of their
claims(s). All accredited agents must
seek reaccreditation every five years. An
individual desiring accreditation or
reaccreditation as an agent must file a
completed application with the Office of
the General Counsel on VA Form 21a on
which the applicant submits the
following:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Applicants for accreditation or
reaccreditation must achieve a score of
75 percent or more on a written
examination administered by VA as a
prerequisite to accreditation and must
achieve such score at least every five
years to maintain accreditation. No
applicant shall be allowed to sit for the
examination more than twice in any 6month period.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 5940)
erjones on PROD1PC68 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 14.633 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a) and
(e)(2)(i).
b. In paragraphs (b), (c) introductory
text, and (d), adding ‘‘or suspended’’
after ‘‘canceled’’ each time it appears.
c. In paragraph (e)(1), removing ‘‘and
maintain the record for 3 years’’.
d. In paragraph (e)(2)(ii), adding ‘‘or
suspension’’ after ‘‘cancellation’’ and
‘‘or suspended’’ after ‘‘cancel’’ each time
it appears.
e. In paragraph (g), adding ‘‘or
suspension or continuation of
suspension’’ after ‘‘termination’’, and by
removing the last sentence of the
paragraph.
The revisions read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Dec 22, 2005
Jkt 208001
§ 14.633 Termination of accreditation of
agents, attorneys, and representatives.
(a) Accreditation may be canceled at
the request of an agent, attorney,
representative, or canceled or
suspended at the request of an
organization. When an organization
requests cancellation of the
accreditation of a representative due to
misconduct or lack of competence on
the part of the representative or because
the representative resigned to avoid
cancellation of accreditation for
misconduct or lack of competence, the
organization shall inform VA of the
reason for the request for cancellation
and the facts and circumstances
surrounding any incident that led to the
request.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) As to representatives, suspend
accreditation immediately and notify
the representative and the
representative’s organization of the
interim suspension and of an intent to
cancel or continue suspension of
accreditation. The notice to the
representative will also state the reasons
for the interim suspension and
impending cancellation or continuation
of suspension, and inform the
representative of a right to request a
hearing on the matter or to submit
additional evidence within 10 working
days following receipt of such notice.
Such time may be extended for a
reasonable period upon a showing of
sufficient cause.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E5–7759 Filed 12–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP–2005–0322; FRL–7751–3]
Benzaldehyde, Captafol,
Hexaconazole, Paraformaldehyde,
Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate, and
Tetradifon; Proposed Tolerance
Actions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke
specific tolerances and tolerance
exemptions for residues of the
insecticides paraformaldehyde and
tetradifon; fungicides captafol,
hexaconazole, and sodium
dimethyldithiocarbamate; and bee
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
repellant benzaldehyde. EPA canceled
food use registrations or deleted food
uses from registrations following
requests for voluntary cancellation or
use deletion by the registrants, or nonpayment of registration maintenance
fees. Also, stakeholders have withdrawn
their support for import tolerances for
captafol and hexaconazole. EPA expects
to determine whether any individuals or
groups want to support these tolerances.
The regulatory actions proposed in this
document contribute toward the
Agency’s tolerance reassessment
requirements under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
section 408(q), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996.
By law, EPA is required by August 2006
to reassess the tolerances that were in
existence on August 2, 1996. The
regulatory actions proposed in this
document pertain to the proposed
revocation of 39 tolerances and
tolerance exemptions of which 38
would be counted as tolerance
reassessments toward the August 2006
review deadline.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA-HQ-OPP–2005–0322, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Agency Web Site: EDOCKET, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system was replaced on November 25,
2005, by an enhanced federal-wide
electronic docket management and
comment system located at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions.
• E-mail: Comments may be sent by
e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID Number EPA-HQOPP–2005–0322.
• Mail: Public Information and
Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB)
(7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001, Attention:
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP–2005–
0322.
• Hand Delivery: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
Number EPA-HQ-OPP–2005–0322. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 246 (Friday, December 23, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76221-76224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7759]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 14
RIN 2900-AM29
Accreditation of Service Organization Representatives and Agents
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations governing accreditation of representatives of claimants for
veterans' benefits. These proposed changes would require that
recognized organizations periodically recertify the qualifications of
accredited representatives, and require that VA is notified when a
recognized organization requests cancellation of a representative's
accreditation based upon misconduct or lack of competence, or if a
representative resigns to avoid cancellation of accreditation for
misconduct or lack of competence. The proposed changes would also
require that accredited claims agents periodically reestablish their
good character and reputation and qualifications to assist claimants
for VA benefits. We would also clarify that the authority to cancel
accreditation includes the authority to suspend accreditation for a
period of time. The purpose of these proposed changes is to ensure that
claimants for veterans' benefits have responsible, qualified
representation in the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of
claims.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by: mail or hand-delivery
to Director, Regulations Management (00REG1), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to
(202) 273-9026; e-mail through www.Regulations.gov. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AM29.'' All
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office
of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 273-9515 for an appointment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Staff
Attorney, Office of General Counsel (022G), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-6315.
(This is not a toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 5902 of title 38, United States
Code, authorizes the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to recognize
representatives of approved organizations for the preparation,
presentation, and prosecution of claims under laws administered by the
Secretary. Section 5904 of title 38, United States Code, authorizes the
Secretary to recognize any individual as an agent or attorney for the
preparation, presentation, and prosecution of claims under laws
administered by the Secretary. It further authorizes the Secretary to
require such individuals to show that they are of good moral character
and in good repute, are qualified to render claimants valuable service,
and otherwise are competent to assist claimants in presenting claims as
a prerequisite to recognition. Section 5901 of title 38, United States
Code, prohibits an individual from acting as an agent or attorney in
the preparation, presentation, or prosecution of any claim under laws
administered by the Secretary, unless such individual has been
recognized for such purposes by the Secretary. The purpose of the
regulation of representatives is to assure that claimants for
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits have responsible,
qualified representation in the preparation, presentation, and
prosecution of claims for such benefits. See 38 CFR 14.626.
The Secretary has promulgated regulations specifying criteria that
must be met for an individual to be approved as an accredited
representative through a recognized organization or as an accredited
claims agent. Pursuant to 38 CFR 14.629(a), recognized organizations
[[Page 76222]]
must certify that each prospective representative is of good character
and reputation and has demonstrated an ability to represent claimants.
In addition, the organization must certify that the prospective
representative is a member in good standing or paid employee of the
organization or accredited and functioning as a representative of
another recognized organization. Individuals desiring accreditation as
an agent must establish their good character and reputation and
qualifications to assist claimants in the preparation of their claims
under 38 CFR 14.629(b). They must file a specific application (VA Form
21a) containing particular information and achieve a passing score on a
written VA examination. If, subsequent to having been certified or
accredited, a representative or agent fails to meet any of these
criteria, they would no longer be qualified to represent claimants for
veterans' benefits.
After a period of time, a representative may no longer have the
requisite ties to the certifying organization through membership or
employment to qualify as an accredited representative, the
representative may not have maintained the skills required for
effective representation, or information may have come to light
concerning the representative's competence or character. Similarly, an
agent may not have maintained the skills, competence, or good character
required to assist claimants. Consequently, we propose to require that
recognized organizations periodically recertify the qualifications of
the accredited representatives of the organization and that agents
reestablish their character, reputation and qualifications to assist VA
benefits claimants by refiling VA Form 21a and retaking the written
examination. Recertification of representatives would be accomplished
using the same VA Form 21 that is currently used for requests for
accreditation, except that only the certifying official of the
recognized organization, not the individual representatives, would be
required to sign the form for purposes of recertification. The
organization would file the form with the VA Office of General Counsel
not later than five years after initial accreditation of the
representative by VA or the most recent recertification of the
representative by the organization. Thus, as an initial requirement
under this rule, recognized organizations would be required to
recertify the character and qualifications of any representative that
received VA accreditation five or more years before the effective date
of the rule. Recertification will ensure that claimants for VA benefits
continue to have responsible, qualified representation. Requiring
recertification every five years strikes an appropriate balance between
the need to assure continuing qualifications and the need to avoid
unnecessary paperwork for organizations and the Department.
Pursuant to 38 CFR 14.633(a), VA may cancel the accreditation of a
representative at the request of the organization that certified the
individual to VA. Under current regulations, when an organization
requests that VA cancel the accreditation of one of its
representative's, the organization need not disclose the reason for
requesting cancellation. Individuals may be accredited through more
than one organization, and when one organization requests cancellation
of a representative's accreditation for cause, such as misconduct or
incompetence, it is desirable that VA and the other organization or
organizations through which the individual is accredited know the basis
for the cancellation, so that they may determine whether the individual
should remain accredited through the other organization or
organizations. Further, the individual may later seek accreditation
through another organization, and this information would be valuable to
VA in determining whether to approve the accreditation.
Therefore, we propose to add a requirement to 38 CFR 14.633(a) that
any recognized organization requesting that a particular
representative's accreditation be cancelled inform VA if the reason for
such request for cancellation is misconduct or lack of competence on
the part of the representative or resignation of the representative to
avoid cancellation of accreditation for misconduct or lack of
competence. Only if VA learns of any improper conduct or incompetence
on the part of an accredited representative can it investigate and, if
necessary, take action to terminate accreditation through other
organizations to assure that claimants have responsible, qualified
representation.
In addition, we propose to clarify that the authority to cancel
accreditation includes the authority to suspend accreditation for a
period of time. We consider our current authority to cancel
accreditation to include the lesser sanction of suspension, and this
amendment would make that clear. Suspension may be appropriate in cases
involving extenuating circumstances or where misconduct is not so
severe as to warrant the harsher penalty of permanently canceling the
authority to represent claimants.
Finally, we propose to remove the requirement in 38 CFR 14.633 that
we maintain records for three years in a case that has been under
inquiry or when accreditation has been canceled or suspended because we
do not limit our maintenance of such records.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection
requirements included in this proposed regulation are revisions of
existing collections under Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Control No. 2900-0018, which pertains to the application for
accreditation as a service organization representative, and OMB Control
No. 2900-0605, which pertains to the application for accreditation as a
claims agent. Comments on the information collections included in this
proposed rule should be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503,
with copies sent by mail or hand delivery to the Director, Regulations
Management (00REG1)), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont
Avenue, NW, Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; fax to (202) 273-9026; e-
mail through www.Regulations.gov. Comments should indicate that they
are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AM29,'' and must be received on
or before February 21, 2006.
Comments by the public on proposed collections of information will
help VA in--
Evaluating whether the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of the Department's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
[[Page 76223]]
OMB assigns control numbers to collections of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Title: Accreditation of Service Organization Representatives and
Agents.
Summary of collection of information:
Section 14.629(a)--Under this section, VA requires the
individual and organization seeking accreditation to provide basic
information demonstrating eligibility for accreditation and VA requires
the sponsoring recognized organization to certify that the individual
is of good character and is qualified to present claims. VA proposes to
require recognized veterans service organizations to recertify the
qualifications of accredited representatives of the organization every
five years.
Section 14.629(b)--Under this section, VA requires
individuals seeking accreditation to establish their good character,
reputation, and qualifications to present claims. VA proposes to
require agents to reestablish their good character and qualifications
by filing VA Form 21a and passing a written VA examination every five
years.
Section 14.633(a)--Under this section, VA proposes to
require recognized veterans service organizations to inform VA of the
reason for a request to cancel a representative's accreditation under
certain circumstances.
Description of need for information and proposed use of
information: The collections of information are necessary to ensure
that claimants for VA benefits have responsible, qualified
representation in the preparation, presentation, and prosecution of
claims. VA will use this information to determine whether particular
individuals are qualified to represent claimants before VA.
Description of likely respondents: Individuals applying for
accreditation as agents and service organization representatives and
recognized service organizations that request accreditation of
representatives or that have representatives accredited to represent
claimants for VA benefits.
Estimated number of respondents: For recertifications under 38 CFR
14.629(a), we anticipate receiving 2,360 responses in fiscal year 2006.
For recertifications under 38 CFR 14.629(b), we anticipate receiving 8
responses in fiscal year 2006. Under 38 CFR 14.633(a), we anticipate
receiving no more than 20 responses in fiscal year 2006.
Estimated frequency of responses: For recertifications under 38 CFR
14.629(a) and (b), once every five years. Under 38 CFR 14.633(a), on
occasion.
Estimated average burden per response: For recertifications under
38 CFR 14.629(a), 10 minutes. Under 38 CFR 14.629(b), 10 minutes. Under
38 CFR 14.633(a), 30 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting burden: For recertifications under
38 CFR 14.629(a), 393 hours in fiscal year 2006. Under 38 CFR
14.629(b), no more than 2 hours in fiscal year 2006. Under 38 CFR
14.633(a), 10 hours in fiscal year 2006.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
VA has examined the economic implications of this proposed rule as
required by Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 12866 classifies a
rule as significant if it meets any one of a number of specified
conditions, including: having an annual effect on the economy of $100
million, adversely affecting a sector of the economy in a material way,
adversely affecting competition, or adversely affecting jobs. A
regulation is also considered a significant regulatory action if it
raises novel legal or policy issues.
VA concludes that this proposed rule is a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order since it raises novel legal and policy
issues under Section 3(f)(4). VA concludes, however, that this proposed
rule does not meet the significance threshold of $100 million effect on
the economy in any one year under Section 3(f)(1). VA requests comments
regarding this determination, and invites commenters to submit any
relevant data that will assist the agency in estimating the impact of
this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq. This proposed rule would affect the 87 veterans
service organizations and 42 agents recognized by VA to represent
benefit claimants. However, it would not have a significant economic
impact on these organizations because it would only impose reporting
requirements the costs of which would not be significant. Therefore,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is exempt from the initial
and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
There are no Federal Domestic Assistance programs associated with
this proposal.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 14
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Courts, Foreign
relations, Government employees, Lawyers, Legal services, Organization
and functions (Government agencies), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Surety bonds, Trusts and trustees, Veterans.
Approved: September 12, 2005.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 14 as follows:
PART 14--LEGAL SERVICES, GENERAL COUNSEL, AND MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS
1. The authority citation for part 14 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 2671-2680; 38 U.S.C. 501(a),
512, 515, 5502, 5902-5905; 28 CFR part 14, appendix to part 14,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Revise Sec. 14.629(a) introductory text, (b)(1) introductory
text, and (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 14.629 Requirements for accreditation of service organization
representatives; agents; and attorneys.
* * * * *
(a) Service Organization Representatives. A recognized organization
shall file with the Office of
[[Page 76224]]
the General Counsel VA Form 21 (Application for Accreditation as
Service Organization Representative) for each person it desires
accredited as a representative of that organization. For each of its
accredited representatives, a recognized organization shall complete
and file with the Office of the General Counsel, not later than five
years after initial accreditation through that organization or the most
recent recertification by that organization, VA Form 21 to certify that
the representative continues to meet the criteria for accreditation
specified in paragraph (a)(1), (2) and (3) of this section. In
recommending a person, the organization shall certify that the
designee:
* * * * *
(b) * * * (1) An individual desiring accreditation as an agent must
establish and demonstrate that he or she is of good character and
reputation and is qualified to render assistance to claimants in the
presentation of their claims(s). All accredited agents must seek
reaccreditation every five years. An individual desiring accreditation
or reaccreditation as an agent must file a completed application with
the Office of the General Counsel on VA Form 21a on which the applicant
submits the following:
* * * * *
(2) Applicants for accreditation or reaccreditation must achieve a
score of 75 percent or more on a written examination administered by VA
as a prerequisite to accreditation and must achieve such score at least
every five years to maintain accreditation. No applicant shall be
allowed to sit for the examination more than twice in any 6-month
period.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 5940)
* * * * *
3. Section 14.633 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (e)(2)(i).
b. In paragraphs (b), (c) introductory text, and (d), adding ``or
suspended'' after ``canceled'' each time it appears.
c. In paragraph (e)(1), removing ``and maintain the record for 3
years''.
d. In paragraph (e)(2)(ii), adding ``or suspension'' after
``cancellation'' and ``or suspended'' after ``cancel'' each time it
appears.
e. In paragraph (g), adding ``or suspension or continuation of
suspension'' after ``termination'', and by removing the last sentence
of the paragraph.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 14.633 Termination of accreditation of agents, attorneys, and
representatives.
(a) Accreditation may be canceled at the request of an agent,
attorney, representative, or canceled or suspended at the request of an
organization. When an organization requests cancellation of the
accreditation of a representative due to misconduct or lack of
competence on the part of the representative or because the
representative resigned to avoid cancellation of accreditation for
misconduct or lack of competence, the organization shall inform VA of
the reason for the request for cancellation and the facts and
circumstances surrounding any incident that led to the request.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) As to representatives, suspend accreditation immediately and
notify the representative and the representative's organization of the
interim suspension and of an intent to cancel or continue suspension of
accreditation. The notice to the representative will also state the
reasons for the interim suspension and impending cancellation or
continuation of suspension, and inform the representative of a right to
request a hearing on the matter or to submit additional evidence within
10 working days following receipt of such notice. Such time may be
extended for a reasonable period upon a showing of sufficient cause.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E5-7759 Filed 12-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P