Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Relaxation of Handling Regulation for Area No. 2, 75981-75984 [E5-7677]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
shipments of mangoes originating from
the island of Guimaras must also
contain an additional declaration stating
that the mangoes were grown on the
island of Guimaras.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
December 2005.
Elizabeth E. Gaston,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E5–7690 Filed 12–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 948
[Docket No. FV05–948–1 PRA]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado;
Relaxation of Handling Regulation for
Area No. 2
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments
on a relaxation of the minimum grade
requirement for certain potatoes
handled under the Colorado potato
marketing order, Area No. 2. The
Colorado Potato Administrative
Committee, Area No. 2 (Committee), the
agency responsible for local
administration of the marketing order,
recommended this rule as a replacement
for a previously issued proposed rule.
This rule would change the minimum
grade from U.S. No. 1 to U.S.
Commercial for varieties of long, redskinned, yellow fleshed potatoes
produced in Area No. 2 measuring from
11⁄2 inch minimum diameter to 21⁄4-inch
maximum diameter (size B), and from 1inch minimum diameter to 13⁄4-inch
maximum diameter. The proposed
change is intended to provide potato
handlers with more marketing
flexibility, growers with increased
returns, and consumers with a greater
supply of small specialty potatoes.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; Email: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Dec 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
326–7440; or George Kelhart, Technical
Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This
proposal is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 97 and Marketing Order
No. 948, both as amended (7 CFR part
948), regulating the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in Colorado, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
This proposal replaces a proposed
rule published in the Federal Register
on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23942). The
comment period for that proposal,
which ended on July 5, 2005, was
reopened until September 12, 2005, in
a document published on August 22,
2005 (70 FR 48903). Five comments
were subsequently received that
addressed the substance of the proposed
rule. In addition to new information
obtained by the Committee, these
comments were considered in the
preparation of this proposed rule.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This proposal
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75981
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would relax the minimum
grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 to
U.S. Commercial for all varieties of long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes
produced in Colorado Area No. 2
measuring from 11⁄2-inch minimum
diameter to 21⁄4-inch maximum
diameter (size B), and from 1-inch
minimum diameter to 13⁄4-inch
maximum diameter. This change to the
original proposal was recommended by
the Committee on October 20, 2005,
with 12 members in favor and one
opposed. The member voting against the
change felt that the minimum grade for
all small potatoes should continue to be
U.S. No. 1. This member is opposed to
having grading exceptions for any
variety of potato. The Committee
believes that this change would
facilitate the marketing of Area No. 2
Colorado potatoes and improve grower
returns. The Committee recommended
this rule as a replacement for a
previously issued proposed rule.
Section 948.22 authorizes the
issuance of grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container
regulations for potatoes grown in the
production area. Section 948.21 further
authorizes the modification, suspension,
or termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 948.22.
Section 948.40 provides that
whenever the handling of potatoes is
regulated pursuant to §§ 948.20 through
948.24, such potatoes must be inspected
by the Federal-State Inspection Service,
and certified as meeting the applicable
requirements of such regulations.
Grade regulations specific to the
handling of potatoes grown in Area No.
2 are contained in § 948.386 of the
order’s handling regulations. Section
948.4 of the order defines the counties
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
75982
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
included in Area No. 2, which is
commonly known as the San Luis
Valley. The State of Colorado is divided
into three areas for marketing order
purposes. Currently, only Area No. 2
and Area No. 3 are active.
The Committee’s initial
recommendation, made on August 19,
2004, was to relax the minimum grade
requirement from U.S. No. 1 to U.S.
Commercial for all Colorado Area No. 2
potato varieties measuring from 11⁄2inch minimum diameter to 21⁄4-inch
maximum diameter (size B), and from 1inch minimum diameter to 13⁄4-inch
maximum diameter. This change was
recommended by the Committee with
nine members in favor and four
opposed. The members voting against
the change believed that the minimum
grade for all small potatoes should
continue to be U.S. No. 1.
The previous proposed rule was
published in the Federal Register on
May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23942), and
comments were invited until July 5,
2005. The comment period was
reopened until September 12, 2005, in
a document published on August 22,
2005 (70 FR 48903), for the purpose of
receiving additional input. Five
comments were received during the
reopened comment period. All of these
comments opposed the relaxation of the
grade requirement because of the
potentially negative impact on the
quality of imported round, red-skinned
varieties of potatoes. Under section
980.1 of the import regulations, the
initially proposed grade change would
have applied to all imported round, redskinned potatoes of the same size
categories during the months of October
through June. All of the commenters
expressed concern that lower quality
imported round, red-skinned potatoes
would adversely affect the domestic
market.
Because this current proposal is
limited to all varieties of long, redskinned, yellow fleshed potatoes,
imported round, red-skinned potato
varieties would not be affected. Under
§ 980.1, imported long type potatoes
must meet the grade, size, quality, and
maturity requirements of Marketing
Order No. 945 (Idaho-Eastern Oregon
potatoes) throughout the entire year.
The Committee met on October 20,
2005, to consider the comments
received regarding the previously issued
proposed rule, as well as other
information received from the Colorado
potato industry. After much discussion,
the Committee recommended that the
rule be modified to reflect that the
relaxed grade requirement would only
apply to long, red-skinned, yellow
fleshed potato varieties.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Dec 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
For many years, consumer demand for
small fresh market potatoes was
relatively soft in comparison to larger
sizes. Size B and smaller potatoes were
often discarded or fed to livestock.
Grade and size regulations were
developed to keep lower quality small
potatoes out of the fresh market. At that
time, the Committee believed that small
potatoes, sold at a great discount,
eroded the price for large potatoes. By
requiring all small potatoes to grade
U.S. No. 1 or better, the Committee
believed that high quality small potatoes
would not have an adverse affect on the
market for larger potatoes.
Recently, however, demand has
increased for varieties of long, redskinned, yellow fleshed small potatoes,
which often command premium prices
compared to larger size A potatoes (17⁄8inch and larger). With the growing
demand for this type of small specialty
potato, some growers and handlers are
concerned that they will not be able to
supply this market, because only U.S.
No. 1 or better grade can be shipped
under the order. Growers and handlers
have had requests from their customers
for long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
varieties of small potatoes that grade
U.S. Commercial or better. This action
would help handlers in Area No. 2 meet
their buyers’ needs.
Committee statistics show that
approximately 65 percent of the entire
potato crop in Area No. 2 grades U.S.
No. 1 or better. However, the percentage
of Size B and smaller potatoes meeting
U.S. No. 1 grade is only about 50
percent. The reason for the lower
percentage of smaller potatoes is
because several potato defects are
scored based on the percentage of
surface area affected on the individual
potato. For example, a cut on a large
potato may not affect a large enough
surface area to be a scorable defect, but
the same size cut would be scorable on
a smaller potato. Under such
circumstances, it would be much harder
for a small potato to meet the U.S. No.
1 grade than it would for a large potato.
The U.S. Commercial grade allows a
slightly higher percentage of total
defects than the U.S. No. 1 grade.
By changing the grade requirement to
allow long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potato varieties that are size B and those
measuring from 1-inch minimum
diameter to 13⁄4-inch maximum
diameter to meet U.S. Commercial grade
or better, the Committee believes more
of this type of small specialty potato
would be available to meet increasing
demand, and thus help increase returns
to growers. Not only would more small
long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potatoes enter the market, these small
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
specialty potatoes typically sell for a
premium price in today’s marketplace.
The Committee believes that by
allowing small long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed potatoes to meet the
more relaxed U.S. Commercial grade
instead of U.S. No. 1 grade, available
volume for sale into the fresh market
could increase by about 10 percent.
Although facing an increasing
demand, the market for small long, redskinned, yellow fleshed potatoes is a
minor segment of the market served by
the Area No. 2 production area. As a
consequence, the Committee believes
that this type of small specialty potato
does not compete directly with the
predominant large potatoes produced in
this area, and that the relaxation of the
grade requirement would not adversely
effect the overall Area No. 2 potato
market.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 88 handlers
of Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes subject
to regulation under the order and
approximately 230 producers in the
regulated production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $6,000,000, and
small agricultural producers are defined
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000.
During the 2004–2005 marketing year,
17,626,974 hundredweight of Colorado
Area No. 2 potatoes were inspected
under the order and sold into the fresh
market. Based on an estimated average
f.o.b. price of $6.75 per hundredweight,
the Committee estimates that 83 Area
No. 2 handlers or about 94 percent had
annual receipts of less than $6,000,000.
In addition, based on information
provided by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the average grower
price for Colorado fall potatoes for 2004
was $4.55 per hundredweight. The
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
average annual grower revenue for the
230 Colorado Area No. 2 potato growers
is therefore calculated to be
approximately $348,708. In view of the
foregoing, the majority of the Colorado
Area No. 2 potato growers and handlers
may be classified as small entities.
This proposal would relax the grade
requirement implemented under the
order from U.S. No. 1 grade to U.S.
Commercial grade for all long, redskinned, yellow fleshed Area No. 2
potato varieties measuring from 11⁄2inch minimum diameter to 21⁄4-inch
maximum diameter (size B) and from 1inch minimum diameter to 13⁄4-inch
maximum diameter.
Authority for this action is contained
in §§ 948.21, 948.22, 948.40, and
948.386.
Regarding the impact of this rule on
affected entities, relaxing the grade
requirement for small long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed varieties of potatoes is
expected to benefit handlers and
growers. By relaxing the minimum
grade requirement for this type of small
specialty potato, a potentially greater
quantity of potatoes would meet the
order’s handling regulations. This could
translate into an increased market for
small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potatoes and greater returns for handlers
and growers.
As small long, red-skinned, yellow
fleshed varieties of potatoes have grown
in popularity with consumers, the
market demand has outpaced the
quantity of these small, high quality
potatoes available from Area No. 2. The
Committee believes that a relaxation in
the grade requirement would increase
the available supply of small long, redskinned, yellow fleshed varieties of
potatoes. These small specialty potatoes
are a minor segment of the potato
market served by the Area No. 2
production area. As such, the
Committee believes that these small
long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potato
varieties do not compete directly with
most of the potatoes produced in this
area and that the relaxation of the grade
requirement would not adversely effect
the overall Area No. 2 potato market.
Based on Committee records, about
half the handlers ship all of the size B
and smaller potatoes grown in Area No.
2. Committee records also indicate that
during the 2004–2005 fiscal period,
approximately 165,000 hundredweight
(less than 1 percent) of size B and
smaller were inspected and shipped. If
this proposed change in the minimum
grade requirement is implemented, the
Committee estimates that the marketable
supply of size B and smaller long, redskinned, yellow fleshed potato varieties
would increase approximately 10
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Dec 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
percent and add about 16,500
hundredweight to the marketable
supply. The Committee anticipates that
the greater quantity of small long, redskinned, yellow fleshed varieties of
potatoes would expand Area No. 2’s
market share, increase the supply of
potatoes available for consumers, and
increase grower returns.
After discussing possible alternatives
to this proposal and reviewing the
comments received in regards to the
previously issued proposed rule (70 FR
23942, May 6, 2005; and 70 FR 48903,
August 22, 2005), the Committee
determined that a relaxation in the
grade requirement to U.S. Commercial
grade for small long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed potatoes would
sufficiently meet the industry’s current
needs. The relaxation in the grade
requirement for this type of small
specialty potato would provide the
greatest benefit to the industry by
augmenting the developing market for
these potatoes and thereby increasing
grower returns.
The previously issued proposal would
have allowed all varieties of small
potatoes produced in Area No. 2 to meet
U.S. Commercial grade, including
round, red-skinned potato varieties.
Under the import regulations, round,
red-skinned potatoes are required to
meet the grade, size, quality, and
maturity requirements of the Area No. 2
Colorado potato marketing order from
October through June. Under the
previous proposal, all imported round,
red-skinned potatoes would have been
allowed into the U.S. as U.S.
Commercial grade during this period.
Commenters expressed concern that
such a relaxation of the grade
requirement for small round, redskinned potatoes could potentially have
a negative impact on the quality of
imported round, red-skinned potatoes.
They were concerned that lower quality
imported round, red-skinned potatoes
would adversely affect the domestic
market. However, this current proposal
would only relax the grade requirement
for long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potato varieties and, therefore, would
not change the grade requirement for
round, red-skinned potatoes or for any
imported round, red-skinned potatoes
during the months of October through
June.
This proposal would not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
potato handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75983
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
In addition, the Committee’s meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
Colorado potato industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 19,
2004, and the October 20, 2005,
meetings were public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Fifteen days is deemed
appropriate because this rule would
need to be in place as soon as possible
since handlers are already shipping
potatoes from the 2005–2006 crop. In
addition, this rule replaces a previously
proposed rule. Affected entities were
allowed to provide input during the
previous comment periods and all
comments were considered in the
preparation of this proposal. Also, any
additional comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 948—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN COLORADO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 948 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 948.386, paragraphs (a)(3) and
(a)(4) are revised to read as follows:
§ 948.386
Handling regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) All varieties. Size B, if U.S. No. 1
or better grade: Provided, That varieties
of long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potatoes shall grade U.S. Commercial or
better.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
75984
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 245 / Thursday, December 22, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(4) All varieties. 1-inch minimum
diameter to 13⁄4-inch maximum
diameter, if U.S. No. 1 or better grade:
Provided, That varieties of long, redskinned, yellow fleshed potatoes shall
grade U.S. Commercial or better.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E5–7677 Filed 12–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 979
[Docket No. FV06–979–1 PR]
Melons Grown in South Texas;
Proposed Termination of Marketing
Order 979
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This rule proposes to
terminate the Federal marketing order
for melons grown in South Texas (order)
and the rules and regulations issued
thereunder. The order contains
authority to regulate the handling of
melons grown in South Texas and is
administered locally by the South Texas
Melon Committee (Committee). The
Committee recommended terminating
the order at a meeting on September 7,
2005. The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) suspended regulations under
the order while it considered the
Committee’s recommendation. This rule
invites comments on proposed
termination of the order.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
720–8938; E-mail: moab.
docketclerk@usda.gov; or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:34 Dec 21, 2005
Jkt 205001
Martin J. Engeler, Senior Marketing
Specialist, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102–B, Fresno,
California 93721; telephone: (559) 487–
5110, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or Kathleen
M. Finn, Formal Rulemaking Team
Leader, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@USDA.gov.
This
proposed rule is governed by section
608c(16)(A) of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act’’, and § 979.84 of
the order.
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposed termination of the
order has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule proposes to terminate the
Federal marketing order for melons
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
grown in South Texas and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder. The
order contains authority to regulate the
handling of melons grown in South
Texas and is administered locally by the
South Texas Melon Committee
(Committee). At a meeting held on
September 7, 2005, the Committee
recommended terminating the order.
USDA suspended indefinitely
regulations under the order while it
considers the Committee’s
recommendation for termination (70 FR
57995; October 5, 2005). This rule
invites comments on proposed
termination of the order.
Section 979.84 of the order provides,
in pertinent part, that the Secretary shall
terminate or suspend any or all
provisions of the order when he finds
that it does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. Section
608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that the
Secretary shall terminate or suspend the
operation of any order whenever the
order or provision thereof obstructs or
does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. The Secretary must
notify Congress not later than 60 days
before the date the order would be
terminated.
The order has been in effect since
1979. It contains authority for grade,
size, quality, maturity, pack, container,
and reporting requirements. It also
authorizes production research and
marketing research and development
activities. Grade, quality, maturity,
container, and pack regulations have
historically been utilized under the
order, as well as mandatory inspection
to ensure these requirements were met.
Assessments have been collected to
fund order operations, including
production research and marketing
research and promotion activities.
Reporting requirements have also been
implemented under the order.
The South Texas melon industry has
been shrinking in recent seasons due to
the inability to provide a dependable
supply of good quality fruit, a lack of
success in developing new varieties of
improved quality melons, and intense
domestic and foreign competition.
Acreage decreased from a high of 27,463
acres in 1987 to 4,780 acres in 2004. The
number of producers and handlers has
decreased significantly as well.
Because of the declining status of the
industry, on September 16, 2004, the
Committee recommended suspending
all regulatory and reporting
requirements and assessment
collections under the order for the
2004–05 season, except one reporting
requirement regarding planted acreage.
The suspension was recommended for
one season with the hope that new
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 245 (Thursday, December 22, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75981-75984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7677]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 948
[Docket No. FV05-948-1 PRA]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Relaxation of Handling
Regulation for Area No. 2
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule invites comments on a relaxation of the minimum
grade requirement for certain potatoes handled under the Colorado
potato marketing order, Area No. 2. The Colorado Potato Administrative
Committee, Area No. 2 (Committee), the agency responsible for local
administration of the marketing order, recommended this rule as a
replacement for a previously issued proposed rule. This rule would
change the minimum grade from U.S. No. 1 to U.S. Commercial for
varieties of long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes produced in
Area No. 2 measuring from 1\1/2\ inch minimum diameter to 2\1/4\-inch
maximum diameter (size B), and from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-
inch maximum diameter. The proposed change is intended to provide
potato handlers with more marketing flexibility, growers with increased
returns, and consumers with a greater supply of small specialty
potatoes.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson, Northwest Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503)
326-7440; or George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 97 and Marketing Order No. 948, both as amended (7 CFR
part 948), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Colorado,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
This proposal replaces a proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23942). The comment period for that
proposal, which ended on July 5, 2005, was reopened until September 12,
2005, in a document published on August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48903). Five
comments were subsequently received that addressed the substance of the
proposed rule. In addition to new information obtained by the
Committee, these comments were considered in the preparation of this
proposed rule.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This proposal will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would relax the minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 1
to U.S. Commercial for all varieties of long, red-skinned, yellow
fleshed potatoes produced in Colorado Area No. 2 measuring from 1\1/2\-
inch minimum diameter to 2\1/4\-inch maximum diameter (size B), and
from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-inch maximum diameter. This
change to the original proposal was recommended by the Committee on
October 20, 2005, with 12 members in favor and one opposed. The member
voting against the change felt that the minimum grade for all small
potatoes should continue to be U.S. No. 1. This member is opposed to
having grading exceptions for any variety of potato. The Committee
believes that this change would facilitate the marketing of Area No. 2
Colorado potatoes and improve grower returns. The Committee recommended
this rule as a replacement for a previously issued proposed rule.
Section 948.22 authorizes the issuance of grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container regulations for potatoes grown in the
production area. Section 948.21 further authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
948.22.
Section 948.40 provides that whenever the handling of potatoes is
regulated pursuant to Sec. Sec. 948.20 through 948.24, such potatoes
must be inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service, and
certified as meeting the applicable requirements of such regulations.
Grade regulations specific to the handling of potatoes grown in
Area No. 2 are contained in Sec. 948.386 of the order's handling
regulations. Section 948.4 of the order defines the counties
[[Page 75982]]
included in Area No. 2, which is commonly known as the San Luis Valley.
The State of Colorado is divided into three areas for marketing order
purposes. Currently, only Area No. 2 and Area No. 3 are active.
The Committee's initial recommendation, made on August 19, 2004,
was to relax the minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 to U.S.
Commercial for all Colorado Area No. 2 potato varieties measuring from
1\1/2\-inch minimum diameter to 2\1/4\-inch maximum diameter (size B),
and from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-inch maximum diameter. This
change was recommended by the Committee with nine members in favor and
four opposed. The members voting against the change believed that the
minimum grade for all small potatoes should continue to be U.S. No. 1.
The previous proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on
May 6, 2005 (70 FR 23942), and comments were invited until July 5,
2005. The comment period was reopened until September 12, 2005, in a
document published on August 22, 2005 (70 FR 48903), for the purpose of
receiving additional input. Five comments were received during the
reopened comment period. All of these comments opposed the relaxation
of the grade requirement because of the potentially negative impact on
the quality of imported round, red-skinned varieties of potatoes. Under
section 980.1 of the import regulations, the initially proposed grade
change would have applied to all imported round, red-skinned potatoes
of the same size categories during the months of October through June.
All of the commenters expressed concern that lower quality imported
round, red-skinned potatoes would adversely affect the domestic market.
Because this current proposal is limited to all varieties of long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes, imported round, red-skinned
potato varieties would not be affected. Under Sec. 980.1, imported
long type potatoes must meet the grade, size, quality, and maturity
requirements of Marketing Order No. 945 (Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes)
throughout the entire year.
The Committee met on October 20, 2005, to consider the comments
received regarding the previously issued proposed rule, as well as
other information received from the Colorado potato industry. After
much discussion, the Committee recommended that the rule be modified to
reflect that the relaxed grade requirement would only apply to long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed potato varieties.
For many years, consumer demand for small fresh market potatoes was
relatively soft in comparison to larger sizes. Size B and smaller
potatoes were often discarded or fed to livestock. Grade and size
regulations were developed to keep lower quality small potatoes out of
the fresh market. At that time, the Committee believed that small
potatoes, sold at a great discount, eroded the price for large
potatoes. By requiring all small potatoes to grade U.S. No. 1 or
better, the Committee believed that high quality small potatoes would
not have an adverse affect on the market for larger potatoes.
Recently, however, demand has increased for varieties of long, red-
skinned, yellow fleshed small potatoes, which often command premium
prices compared to larger size A potatoes (1\7/8\-inch and larger).
With the growing demand for this type of small specialty potato, some
growers and handlers are concerned that they will not be able to supply
this market, because only U.S. No. 1 or better grade can be shipped
under the order. Growers and handlers have had requests from their
customers for long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed varieties of small
potatoes that grade U.S. Commercial or better. This action would help
handlers in Area No. 2 meet their buyers' needs.
Committee statistics show that approximately 65 percent of the
entire potato crop in Area No. 2 grades U.S. No. 1 or better. However,
the percentage of Size B and smaller potatoes meeting U.S. No. 1 grade
is only about 50 percent. The reason for the lower percentage of
smaller potatoes is because several potato defects are scored based on
the percentage of surface area affected on the individual potato. For
example, a cut on a large potato may not affect a large enough surface
area to be a scorable defect, but the same size cut would be scorable
on a smaller potato. Under such circumstances, it would be much harder
for a small potato to meet the U.S. No. 1 grade than it would for a
large potato. The U.S. Commercial grade allows a slightly higher
percentage of total defects than the U.S. No. 1 grade.
By changing the grade requirement to allow long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed potato varieties that are size B and those measuring
from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-inch maximum diameter to meet
U.S. Commercial grade or better, the Committee believes more of this
type of small specialty potato would be available to meet increasing
demand, and thus help increase returns to growers. Not only would more
small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes enter the market,
these small specialty potatoes typically sell for a premium price in
today's marketplace.
The Committee believes that by allowing small long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed potatoes to meet the more relaxed U.S. Commercial grade
instead of U.S. No. 1 grade, available volume for sale into the fresh
market could increase by about 10 percent.
Although facing an increasing demand, the market for small long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes is a minor segment of the market
served by the Area No. 2 production area. As a consequence, the
Committee believes that this type of small specialty potato does not
compete directly with the predominant large potatoes produced in this
area, and that the relaxation of the grade requirement would not
adversely effect the overall Area No. 2 potato market.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 88 handlers of Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 230 producers
in the regulated production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $6,000,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
During the 2004-2005 marketing year, 17,626,974 hundredweight of
Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes were inspected under the order and sold
into the fresh market. Based on an estimated average f.o.b. price of
$6.75 per hundredweight, the Committee estimates that 83 Area No. 2
handlers or about 94 percent had annual receipts of less than
$6,000,000.
In addition, based on information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the average grower price for Colorado
fall potatoes for 2004 was $4.55 per hundredweight. The
[[Page 75983]]
average annual grower revenue for the 230 Colorado Area No. 2 potato
growers is therefore calculated to be approximately $348,708. In view
of the foregoing, the majority of the Colorado Area No. 2 potato
growers and handlers may be classified as small entities.
This proposal would relax the grade requirement implemented under
the order from U.S. No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial grade for all long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed Area No. 2 potato varieties measuring from
1\1/2\-inch minimum diameter to 2\1/4\-inch maximum diameter (size B)
and from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-inch maximum diameter.
Authority for this action is contained in Sec. Sec. 948.21,
948.22, 948.40, and 948.386.
Regarding the impact of this rule on affected entities, relaxing
the grade requirement for small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
varieties of potatoes is expected to benefit handlers and growers. By
relaxing the minimum grade requirement for this type of small specialty
potato, a potentially greater quantity of potatoes would meet the
order's handling regulations. This could translate into an increased
market for small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes and greater
returns for handlers and growers.
As small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed varieties of potatoes
have grown in popularity with consumers, the market demand has outpaced
the quantity of these small, high quality potatoes available from Area
No. 2. The Committee believes that a relaxation in the grade
requirement would increase the available supply of small long, red-
skinned, yellow fleshed varieties of potatoes. These small specialty
potatoes are a minor segment of the potato market served by the Area
No. 2 production area. As such, the Committee believes that these small
long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potato varieties do not compete
directly with most of the potatoes produced in this area and that the
relaxation of the grade requirement would not adversely effect the
overall Area No. 2 potato market.
Based on Committee records, about half the handlers ship all of the
size B and smaller potatoes grown in Area No. 2. Committee records also
indicate that during the 2004-2005 fiscal period, approximately 165,000
hundredweight (less than 1 percent) of size B and smaller were
inspected and shipped. If this proposed change in the minimum grade
requirement is implemented, the Committee estimates that the marketable
supply of size B and smaller long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potato
varieties would increase approximately 10 percent and add about 16,500
hundredweight to the marketable supply. The Committee anticipates that
the greater quantity of small long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
varieties of potatoes would expand Area No. 2's market share, increase
the supply of potatoes available for consumers, and increase grower
returns.
After discussing possible alternatives to this proposal and
reviewing the comments received in regards to the previously issued
proposed rule (70 FR 23942, May 6, 2005; and 70 FR 48903, August 22,
2005), the Committee determined that a relaxation in the grade
requirement to U.S. Commercial grade for small long, red-skinned,
yellow fleshed potatoes would sufficiently meet the industry's current
needs. The relaxation in the grade requirement for this type of small
specialty potato would provide the greatest benefit to the industry by
augmenting the developing market for these potatoes and thereby
increasing grower returns.
The previously issued proposal would have allowed all varieties of
small potatoes produced in Area No. 2 to meet U.S. Commercial grade,
including round, red-skinned potato varieties. Under the import
regulations, round, red-skinned potatoes are required to meet the
grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements of the Area No. 2
Colorado potato marketing order from October through June. Under the
previous proposal, all imported round, red-skinned potatoes would have
been allowed into the U.S. as U.S. Commercial grade during this period.
Commenters expressed concern that such a relaxation of the grade
requirement for small round, red-skinned potatoes could potentially
have a negative impact on the quality of imported round, red-skinned
potatoes. They were concerned that lower quality imported round, red-
skinned potatoes would adversely affect the domestic market. However,
this current proposal would only relax the grade requirement for long,
red-skinned, yellow fleshed potato varieties and, therefore, would not
change the grade requirement for round, red-skinned potatoes or for any
imported round, red-skinned potatoes during the months of October
through June.
This proposal would not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large potato handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
In addition, the Committee's meetings were widely publicized
throughout the Colorado potato industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee
deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the August 19, 2004, and
the October 20, 2005, meetings were public meetings and all entities,
both large and small, were able to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the
regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate because
this rule would need to be in place as soon as possible since handlers
are already shipping potatoes from the 2005-2006 crop. In addition,
this rule replaces a previously proposed rule. Affected entities were
allowed to provide input during the previous comment periods and all
comments were considered in the preparation of this proposal. Also, any
additional comments received will be considered prior to finalization
of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 948--IRISH POTATOES GROWN IN COLORADO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 948 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. In Sec. 948.386, paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) are revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 948.386 Handling regulation.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) All varieties. Size B, if U.S. No. 1 or better grade: Provided,
That varieties of long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed potatoes shall
grade U.S. Commercial or better.
[[Page 75984]]
(4) All varieties. 1-inch minimum diameter to 1\3/4\-inch maximum
diameter, if U.S. No. 1 or better grade:
Provided, That varieties of long, red-skinned, yellow fleshed
potatoes shall grade U.S. Commercial or better.
* * * * *
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E5-7677 Filed 12-21-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P