Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Southern Resident Killer Whale Watching Industry Socioeconomic Study, 75792-75793 [E5-7585]
Download as PDF
75792
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E5–7586 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter has been conducted in
accordance with these Rules.
Panel Decision: The panel affirmed
the International Trade Commission’s
final injury determination on remand
respecting Hard Red Spring Wheat from
Canada.
The NAFTA Secretariat was
instructed to issue a Notice of Final
Panel Action on the 11th day following
the December 12, 2005 panel decision.
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), Article 1904 Binational Panel
Reviews
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Caratina L. Alston,
U.S. Secretary NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E5–7628 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
NAF Secretariat, United States
Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Decision of Panel.
AGENCY:
On December 12, 2005 the
binational panel issued its decision in
the review of the injury determination
made by the International Trade
Commission, respecting Hard Red
Spring Wheat from Canada Final Injury
Determination, Secretariat File No.
USA–CDA–2003–1904–06. The
binational panel affirmed the
International Trade Commission. Copies
of the panel decision are available from
the U.S. Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:53 Dec 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Southern Resident
Killer Whale Watching Industry
Socioeconomic Study
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
DOC.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 21,
2006.
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Suzanne M. Russell, 206–
860–3274 or suzanne.russell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Abstract
Orca whales, also known as killer
whales (Orcinus orca), are cultural icons
for the human residents of the Pacific
Northwest’s Puget Sound. The
importance of killer whales is clearly
evident for the tribal cultures of the
area, expressed in artwork throughout
the Pacific Northwest, and for the whale
watching tourism industry.
In 2003, the Southern Resident Killer
Whales (SRKW) were officially listed as
depleted under the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). This listing
resulted in the development of a
proposed conservation plan which
outlines the steps to be taken to restore
the population to full health. In 2005,
the SRKW were selected for additional
protection through an endangered
species listing under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA).
The presence of killer whales in the
Puget Sound basin brings these animals
in close proximity to humans. This
unique circumstance has fostered the
development of a whale watching
industry that aims to provide tourists
opportunities to view the whales. This
industry is dependent on the healthy
existence of the whales and their
continued return to the Puget Sound.
Ongoing marine biological studies
related to the SRKW consider many
aspects of the ecosystem. Social
sciences consider the human
components of the ecosystem. Together,
the biological and social sciences can
complement one another, leading
toward a more integrated understanding
of the ecosystem. The link between the
SRKW and the whale watching industry
in the Puget Sound provides a uniquely
important rational for conducting
studies in both biological and social
science disciplines. The main goal of
this study is to describe the whale
watching tourism industry as it pertains
to the SRKW.
II. Method of Collection
Literature reviews, secondary sources
including Internet sources, U.S. Census
data, key informants, focus groups,
paper surveys, electronic surveys, and
in person interviews will be utilized to
obtain the broadest scope of information
as possible.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; not-for-profit institutions;
and business or other for-profit
organizations; State or Local
government, Federal government.
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices
Estimated Number of Respondents:
350.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2 hours
and 50 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,000.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E5–7585 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 121605A]
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council will convene a
public meeting of the Shrimp Advisory
Panel (AP).
DATES: The Shrimp AP meeting is
scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. on
Thursday, January 5, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the SpringHill Suites Houston Hobby
Airport, 7922 Mosley Road, Houston,
Texas 77061.
Council address: Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council, 2203
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Dec 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa,
Florida 33607.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Richard Leard, Deputy Executive
Director; telephone 813.348.1630.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Shrimp AP will receive reports from the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) on the status and health of the
shrimp stocks as well as a report on the
biological and economic aspects of the
2005 Cooperative Shrimp Closure with
the state of Texas. The Shrimp AP may
make recommendations for a
cooperative closure with Texas for 2006.
The Shrimp AP will review scoping
documents for both Amendment 27 to
the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan
(FMP)/Amendment 14 to the Shrimp
FMP and Amendment 28 to the Reef
Fish FMP/Amendment 15 to the Shrimp
FMP. Joint Reef Fish Amendment 27/
Shrimp Amendment 14 proposes
actions that deal with adjustments to the
total allowable catch (TAC) for red
snapper; size limits; bag limits;
recreational season dates; and the
certification of new shrimp bycatch
reduction devices (BRDs). The
amendment will also look at shrimp
limits on trawling gear, shrimp
restrictions on the transfer of vessel
permits, and possible area closures for
shrimp.
Joint Reef Fish Amendment 28/
Shrimp Amendment 15 will consider
such issues as gear restrictions for the
reef fish fishery; establishing
commercial fishing seasons; further
reducing bycatch; as well as other
management alternatives.
The Shrimp AP consists principally of
commercial shrimp fishermen, dealers,
and association representatives.
Although other non-emergency issues
not on the agenda may come before the
AP for discussion, in accordance with
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during these
meetings. Actions of the AP will be
restricted to those issues specifically
identified in the agenda and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
Section 305(c) of the M-SFCMA,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take action to
address the emergency.
Copies of the agenda can be obtained
by calling 813.348.1630. This meeting is
physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Dawn Aring at the
Council (see ADDRESSES) at least five
working days prior to the meeting.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75793
Dated: December 16, 2005.
Emily Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E5–7594 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 121605B]
New England Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) is
scheduling a public meeting of its
Magnuson-Stevens Committee in
November, 2005 to consider actions
affecting New England fisheries in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ).
Recommendations from this group will
be brought to the full Council for formal
consideration and action, if appropriate.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, January 10, 2006 at 10 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The
meeting will be held at the New
England Fishery Management Council
Office, 50 Water Street, Mill 2,
Newburyport, MA 01950; telephone:
(978) 465–0492; fax: (978) 465–3116.
Council address: New England
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
J. Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council;
telephone: (978) 465–0492.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee will meet to review and
Council positions on issues related to
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation Management Act
reauthorization and, if available, a new
Senate staff draft of the Act. Any
committee recommendations will be
forwarded for approval at the Council’s
January 31–February 2, 2006 meeting
scheduled in Portland, ME.
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically
listed in this notice and any issues
arising after publication of this notice
that require emergency action under
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75792-75793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7585]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Southern
Resident Killer Whale Watching Industry Socioeconomic Study
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), DOC.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before February 21,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Suzanne M. Russell, 206-860-3274 or
suzanne.russell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Orca whales, also known as killer whales (Orcinus orca), are
cultural icons for the human residents of the Pacific Northwest's Puget
Sound. The importance of killer whales is clearly evident for the
tribal cultures of the area, expressed in artwork throughout the
Pacific Northwest, and for the whale watching tourism industry.
In 2003, the Southern Resident Killer Whales (SRKW) were officially
listed as depleted under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). This
listing resulted in the development of a proposed conservation plan
which outlines the steps to be taken to restore the population to full
health. In 2005, the SRKW were selected for additional protection
through an endangered species listing under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA).
The presence of killer whales in the Puget Sound basin brings these
animals in close proximity to humans. This unique circumstance has
fostered the development of a whale watching industry that aims to
provide tourists opportunities to view the whales. This industry is
dependent on the healthy existence of the whales and their continued
return to the Puget Sound.
Ongoing marine biological studies related to the SRKW consider many
aspects of the ecosystem. Social sciences consider the human components
of the ecosystem. Together, the biological and social sciences can
complement one another, leading toward a more integrated understanding
of the ecosystem. The link between the SRKW and the whale watching
industry in the Puget Sound provides a uniquely important rational for
conducting studies in both biological and social science disciplines.
The main goal of this study is to describe the whale watching tourism
industry as it pertains to the SRKW.
II. Method of Collection
Literature reviews, secondary sources including Internet sources,
U.S. Census data, key informants, focus groups, paper surveys,
electronic surveys, and in person interviews will be utilized to obtain
the broadest scope of information as possible.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; not-for-profit
institutions; and business or other for-profit organizations; State or
Local government, Federal government.
[[Page 75793]]
Estimated Number of Respondents: 350.
Estimated Time Per Response: 2 hours and 50 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,000.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E5-7585 Filed 12-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P