Extension of Administrative Fines Program, 75717-75718 [05-24296]

Agencies

• Federal Election Commission

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 21, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75717-75718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Part 111

[Notice 2005-30]


Extension of Administrative Fines Program

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rule and transmittal of rules to congress.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 721 of the Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban 
Development, Judiciary, District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 2006 (``2006 Appropriations Act'') amended the 
Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2000, to extend the 
expiration date for the Administrative Fines Program (``AFP''). Under 
the AFP, the Federal Election Commission (``Commission'') may assess 
civil monetary penalties for violations of the reporting requirements 
of section 434(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act (``Act'' or 
``FECA''). Accordingly, the Commission is extending the applicability 
of its rules and penalty schedules in implementing the AFP. Further 
information is provided in the Supplementary Information that follows.

DATES: Effective Date: December 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mai T. Dinh, Assistant General 
Counsel, or Ms. Margaret G. Perl, Attorney, 999 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Explanation and Justification for 11 CFR 111.30

    Section 640 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations 
Act, 2000, Public Law 106-58, 113 Stat. 430, 476-77 (1999) (``2000 
Appropriations Act''), amended 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4) to provide for a 
modified enforcement process for violations of certain reporting 
requirements. Under 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4)(C), the Commission may assess a 
civil monetary penalty for violations of the reporting requirements of 
2 U.S.C. 434(a). These amendments to 2 U.S.C. 437g(a)(4) originally 
applied only to violations occurring between January 1, 2000 and 
December 31, 2001. See 2000 Appropriations Act, Sec.  640(c). Congress, 
however, extended authorization for the AFP several times, with the 
most recent extension expiring on December 31, 2005. See Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2004, Public Law 108-199, Sec.  639, 118 Stat. 3, 
359 (2004).
    Commission regulations governing the AFP can be found at 11 CFR 
part 111, subpart B. The Commission incorporated the legislative sunset 
date into its rule describing the applicability of the AFP in 11 CFR 
111.30, and has consistently revised section 111.30 to extend the AFP 
sunset date in accordance with these statutory amendments. See, e.g., 
Final Rule on Extension of Administrative Fines Program, 69 FR 6525 
(Feb. 11, 2004) (changing sunset date in 11 CFR 111.30 to December 31, 
2005).
    Section 721 of the 2006 Appropriations Act amended the 2000 
Appropriations Act by extending the sunset date to include most reports 
that cover activity between July 14, 2000 and December 31, 2008. See 
2006 Appropriations Act, Public Law 109-115, 119 Stat. 2396 (Nov. 30, 
2005). This final rule amends 11 CFR 111.30 to reflect the extended 
sunset date of December 31, 2008. The Commission is not making any 
other revisions to the AFP rules at this time.
    The Commission is promulgating this final rule without notice or an 
opportunity for comment because it falls under the ``good cause'' 
exemption in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). 
This exemption allows agencies to dispense with notice and comment when 
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Id. 
The 2006 Appropriations Act was enacted only a month before the AFP's 
sunset date of December 31, 2005. A notice and comment period for this 
final rule is impracticable because it would result in a gap in the 
applicability of the AFP between when the current regulation expires on 
December 31, 2005 and the date when a new final rule could be effective 
after additional notice and comment. See Administrative Procedure Act: 
Legislative History, S. Doc. No. 248 200 (1946) (`` `Impracticable' 
means a situation in which the due and required execution of the agency 
functions would be unavoidably prevented by its undertaking public 
rule-making proceedings'').
    In addition, this final rule merely extends the applicability of 
the AFP and does not change the substantive regulations themselves. 
Those regulations were already subject to notice and comment when they 
were proposed in March 2000, 65 FR 16534, and adopted in May 2000, 65 
FR 31787, and again when substantive revisions to the AFP were proposed 
in April 2002, 67 FR 20461, and adopted in March 2003, 68 FR 12572. 
Thus, this final rule satisfies the ``good cause'' exemption, and it is 
appropriate and necessary for

[[Page 75718]]

the Commission to publish this final rule without providing a notice 
and comment period.
    The Commission is making this final rule effective immediately upon 
publication in the Federal Register because it falls within the ``good 
cause'' exception to the thirty-day delayed effective date requirement 
set forth at section 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act. See 
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The same reasons that justify the promulgation of 
this final rule without a notice and comment period, as set forth 
above, also justify making this final rule effective without the 
thirty-day delay. Otherwise, a thirty-day delay of the effective date 
would create a gap in the AFP between December 31, 2005, when the 
current regulation sunsets, and the delayed effective date.
    The Commission is submitting this final rule to the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President of the Senate pursuant to 
the Congressional Review of Agency Regulations Act, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), on December 15, 2005. Since this is a non-major rule, it 
is not subject to the delayed effective date provisions of 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(3).

Certification of No Effect Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b) (Regulatory 
Flexibility Act)

    The provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act are not applicable 
to this final rule because the Commission was not required to publish a 
notice of proposed rulemaking or to seek public comment under 5 U.S.C. 
553 or any other laws. 5 U.S.C. 603(a) and 604(a). Therefore, no 
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.

List of Subjects in 11 CFR Part 111

    Administrative practice and procedures, Elections, Law enforcement.


0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, subchapter A, Chapter I of 
Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 111--COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES (2 U.S.C. 437g, 437d(a))

0
1. The authority for part 111 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 2 U.S.C. 437g, 437d(a), 438(a)(8); 28 U.S.C. 2461 nt.


0
2. Section 111.30 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  111.30  When will subpart B apply?

    Subpart B applies to violations of the reporting requirements of 2 
U.S.C. 434(a) committed by political committees and their treasurers 
that relate to the reporting periods that begin on or after July 14, 
2000 and end on or before December 31, 2008. This subpart, however, 
does not apply to reports that were due between January 1, 2004 and 
February 10, 2004 and that relate to reporting periods that begin and 
end between January 1, 2004 and February 10, 2004.

    Dated: December 15, 2005.
Scott E. Thomas,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-24296 Filed 12-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P