Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 75535 [E5-7565]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 211.9
and 211.41 notice is hereby given that
the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) has received a request to expand
an existing waiver of compliance from
certain requirements of Federal railroad
safety regulations. The individual
petition is described below, including
the parties seeking the extension, the
nature of the extension being requested
and the petitioner’s arguments in favor
of relief.
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA–2003–15432]
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway Company (BNSF) seeks
permission to expand the current
Electronic Train Management System
(ETMS) waiver granted on June 23,
2004, into another area of their rail
network. The extension of this pilot will
allow BNSF to further demonstrate the
objectives of ETMS on different track
configurations and operational
scenarios. This extension will also allow
BNSF to demonstrate the ETMS
technology with denser traffic patterns
and give BNSF the potential to test
interoperability with other railroads.
The ETMS pilot project on the
Beardstown subdivision is currently in
the third phase of the FRA waiver that
was granted on June 23, 2004. To date,
BNSF has operated nearly 1700 ETMSactivated trains over this pilot test area.
BNSF has conducted over five hundred
tests in cooperation with the FRA Office
of Safety that have successfully
demonstrated the objectives that are
feasible in the first pilot test area. BNSF
is prepared to continue the testing and
demonstration of the ETMS technology
in other areas of their rail network that
will allow them to further demonstrate
the safety and operational benefits that
the rail industry can derive from this
technology.
The ETMS expansion will be tested
and demonstrated on the BNSF’s Fort
Worth subdivision between Fort Worth,
Texas, milepost 346.67 and Gainesville,
Texas, milepost 411.3. In addition, the
system will be tested and demonstrated
on the Red Rock subdivision between
Gainesville, Texas, milepost 411.3X and
Arkansas City, Kansas, milepost 264.11.
The combined distance of the test
territory is 329 miles. The present
method of operation on the BNSF is
Centralized Traffic Control. The total
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:23 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
trains are approximately 25 per day, 21
BNSF trains, 2 Amtrak trains, and 2
Union Pacific Railroad trains.
BNSF is currently developing an
installation, test, and implementation
plan for this second pilot test area.
BNSF’s present implementation
guidelines would follow the same
methodologies as previously used in the
Beardstown test area with regards to
personnel training and the testing of the
test area’s unique components such as
grade, track configuration, and track
database. In addition, BNSF’s plan for
this area would include a phased
methodology as was done in the
Beardstown test area where Phase 1
included no enforcement with ETMS
active, Phase 2 included enforcement
with ETMS active, and Phase 3 is a
continuance of Phase 2 with some relief
from detail reporting. This approach has
proven to be productive and
comprehensive.
The expansion would begin with
wayside and locomotive equipment
installation in the beginning of 2006.
Upon completion of the wayside
installation, the track database
verification and locomotive testing
would commence. Finally, the phased
revenue demonstration would begin
upon the successful completion of the
verification and validation testing.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2003–
15432) and must be submitted to the
Docket Clerk, DOT Central Docket
Management Facility, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC, 20590–0001.
Communications received within 30
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.). At the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75535
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78). The
Statement may also be found at https://
dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 15,
2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E5–7565 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2005–23226]
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR part 236 as
detailed below.
Applicant: Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway, Mr. Ralph E. Young,
Director Signal Engineering, 4515
Kansas Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas
66106–1199.
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe
Railway (BNSF) seeks relief from the
requirements of the Rules, Standard and
Instructions, Title 49 CFR, Part 236,
Section 236.312, on the Hannibal
Bridge, milepost 0.95, in Kansas City,
Missouri, on the Nebraska Division, St.
Joseph Subdivision, as follows:
1. BNSF requests relief to the extent
that they be allowed to use a modified
easer bar inspection and test procedure
to determine compliance with the rail
surface and alignment requirements.
The modified procedure uses 5/8 inch
as the acceptable tolerance for the
amount of easer bar/casting play.
2. BNSF requests relief from the
requirement that bridge locking
members must be detected within one
inch of their proper positions, to the
extent that they be permitted to
continue using an alternate method of
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 75535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7565]
[[Page 75535]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Parts 211.9 and 211.41 notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) has received a request to expand an existing
waiver of compliance from certain requirements of Federal railroad
safety regulations. The individual petition is described below,
including the parties seeking the extension, the nature of the
extension being requested and the petitioner's arguments in favor of
relief.
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA-2003-15432]
The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) seeks
permission to expand the current Electronic Train Management System
(ETMS) waiver granted on June 23, 2004, into another area of their rail
network. The extension of this pilot will allow BNSF to further
demonstrate the objectives of ETMS on different track configurations
and operational scenarios. This extension will also allow BNSF to
demonstrate the ETMS technology with denser traffic patterns and give
BNSF the potential to test interoperability with other railroads.
The ETMS pilot project on the Beardstown subdivision is currently
in the third phase of the FRA waiver that was granted on June 23, 2004.
To date, BNSF has operated nearly 1700 ETMS-activated trains over this
pilot test area. BNSF has conducted over five hundred tests in
cooperation with the FRA Office of Safety that have successfully
demonstrated the objectives that are feasible in the first pilot test
area. BNSF is prepared to continue the testing and demonstration of the
ETMS technology in other areas of their rail network that will allow
them to further demonstrate the safety and operational benefits that
the rail industry can derive from this technology.
The ETMS expansion will be tested and demonstrated on the BNSF's
Fort Worth subdivision between Fort Worth, Texas, milepost 346.67 and
Gainesville, Texas, milepost 411.3. In addition, the system will be
tested and demonstrated on the Red Rock subdivision between
Gainesville, Texas, milepost 411.3X and Arkansas City, Kansas, milepost
264.11. The combined distance of the test territory is 329 miles. The
present method of operation on the BNSF is Centralized Traffic Control.
The total trains are approximately 25 per day, 21 BNSF trains, 2 Amtrak
trains, and 2 Union Pacific Railroad trains.
BNSF is currently developing an installation, test, and
implementation plan for this second pilot test area. BNSF's present
implementation guidelines would follow the same methodologies as
previously used in the Beardstown test area with regards to personnel
training and the testing of the test area's unique components such as
grade, track configuration, and track database. In addition, BNSF's
plan for this area would include a phased methodology as was done in
the Beardstown test area where Phase 1 included no enforcement with
ETMS active, Phase 2 included enforcement with ETMS active, and Phase 3
is a continuance of Phase 2 with some relief from detail reporting.
This approach has proven to be productive and comprehensive.
The expansion would begin with wayside and locomotive equipment
installation in the beginning of 2006. Upon completion of the wayside
installation, the track database verification and locomotive testing
would commence. Finally, the phased revenue demonstration would begin
upon the successful completion of the verification and validation
testing.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2003-15432) and must be submitted to the Docket Clerk, DOT Central
Docket Management Facility, Room PL-401, Washington, DC, 20590-0001.
Communications received within 30 days of the date of this notice will
be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All written
communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.). At the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78). The Statement
may also be found at https://dms.dot.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 15, 2005.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E5-7565 Filed 12-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P