Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract Pricing and Cost Accounting Standards, 75440-75444 [05-24219]
Download as PDF
75440
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Proposed Rules
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/docket.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (202) 566–1742. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m, Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the public Reading room is (202)
566–1744.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcia L. Spink, Air Protection
Division, Office of Air Programs, Mail
Code: 3AP20; Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 3, 1650 Arch St.,
Philadelphia, PA 19103–2029;
telephone (215) 814–2104, spink.marcia
epa.gov, or Makeba A. Morris, Air
Protection Division, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mail Code; 3AP21;
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 3, 1650 Arch St., Philadelphia,
PA 19103–2029; telephone number:
(215) 814–2187; fax number: (215) 814–
2124; e-mail address:
morris.makeba@epa.gov. To schedule a
meeting with EPA, please contact David
Sanders, Ozone Policy & Strategies
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Group, Air Quality Strategies &
Standards Division, Mail Code C539–02,
Office of Air Quality Planning &
Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711, telephone (919) 541–3356, or by
e-mail at sanders.dave@epa.gov.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air
and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 05–24260 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA–R07–OAR–2005–IA–0006; FRL–8010–
8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Iowa
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the state of
Iowa. These revisions include the
general rulemaking that Iowa completes
for the purpose of updating various
rules, making clarifications and other
minor revisions. EPA is also proposing
approval of revisions to the Iowa
Operating Permits Program for the
purpose of updating and clarifying
various rules included in the general
rulemaking. These revisions add new
definitions, as well as an administrative
correction to a previously submitted
rule. Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between the state
and Federally-approved rules, and
ensure Federal enforceability of the
State’s revised air program rules.
DATES: Comments on this proposed
action must be received in writing by
January 19, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2005–IA–0006 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: Heather Hamilton at
Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Heather Hamilton,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to: Heather Hamilton,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton at (913) 551–7039, or
by e-mail at Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
final rules section of the Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state’s
submittal as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
revision amendment and anticipates no
relevant adverse comments to this
action. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments
are received in response to this action,
no further activity is contemplated in
relation to this action. If EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed action. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on part of
this rule and if that part can be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may
adopt as final those parts of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
Dated: December 12, 2005.
James B. Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 05–24258 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
[DFARS Case 2003–D014]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contract
Pricing and Cost Accounting
Standards
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
Department of Defense (DoD).
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
update text addressing contract pricing
matters and cost accounting standards
administration. This proposed rule is a
result of a transformation initiative
undertaken by DoD to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the
DFARS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
February 21, 2006, to be considered in
the formation of the final rule.
You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2003–D014,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Defense Acquisition Regulations
Web Site: https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/
dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2003–D014 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (703) 602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Bill Sain,
OUSD (AT&L) DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132,
3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Crystal
Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street,
Arlington, VA 22202–3402.
All comments received will be posted
to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/
dfars.nsf.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Bill Sain, (703) 602–0293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major
DoD initiative to dramatically change
the purpose and content of the DFARS.
The objective is to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process, while allowing the
acquisition workforce the flexibility to
innovate. The transformed DFARS will
contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR
authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures
that have a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of DoD or
a significant cost or administrative
impact on contractors or offerors.
Additional information on the DFARS
Transformation initiative is available at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/
dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This proposed rule is a result of the
DFARS Transformation initiative. The
proposed DFARS changes include:
• Addition of text at 215.403–1(c) and
230.201–5(a)(1) to implement Section
817 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003
(Pub. L. 107–314) regarding exceptions
to cost or pricing data requirements and
waiver of cost accounting standards.
• Deletion of 215.404–1(d), Cost
realism analysis, because FAR 15.404–1
contains sufficient policy on this
subject.
• Deletion of unnecessary
introductory text at redesignated
215.404–71–4(f), Facilities capital
employed, Values: Normal and
designated ranges.
• Deletion of the definition of
‘‘Acceptable estimating system’’ from
215.407–5–70(a)(1), and relocation of
the definition to the contract clause at
252.215–7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements; addition of a crossreference in 215.407–5–70(a)(1) to the
relocated definition; elimination of
215.407–5–70(b)(1)(iii) and (iv) and
relocation of the language to the new
definition at 252.215–7002(a); and
deletion of duplicative language at
252.215–7002(b).
• Revision of 230.201–5(a)(1)(A) to
address the authority of the Director,
Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy, to grant cost accounting
standards waivers, in accordance with
Section 802 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000
(Pub. L. 106–65).
• Removal of 230.7000, Contract
facilities capital estimates; 230.7001,
Use of DD Form 1861; 230.7002,
Preaward facilities capital applications;
and 230.7004–2, DD Form 1861, and
relocation of text on these subjects to
215.404–4, Profit, since these sections
pertain to the calculation of weighted
guidelines for profit, rather than cost
accounting standards.
• Elimination of 230.7003, Postaward
facilities capital applications, and
230.7004–1, Forms CASB–CMF, since
these sections duplicate CAS 414, Cost
of Money as an Element of the Cost of
Facilities Capital; FAR 31.205–10, Cost
of Money; and the implementing
contract clauses.
• Elimination of the definitions at
230.7100(a) and (b), since these
definitions are provided in the cost
accounting standards (CAS); elimination
of the definition at 230.7100(c), because
it conflicts with CAS; and elimination of
the definition at 230.7100(d), because it
is unnecessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75441
• Elimination of 230.7101,
Calculations, and 230.7102,
Determining imputed cost of money,
because they are adequately covered in
CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element
of the Cost of Capital Assets Under
Construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
• Removal of 230.7103, Preaward
capital employed application, and
relocation of that coverage to 215.404–
73(b)(2)(i), Offsets for facilities capital
cost of money, since it applies to offsets
in determining profit, rather than cost
accounting standards.
• Relocation of the following text to
the new DFARS companion resource,
Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(PGI). Additional information on PGI is
available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
• 215.403–1(c)(1), Adequate price
competition.
• 215.403–5, Instructions for
submission of cost or pricing data or
information other than cost or pricing
data.
• 215.404–2, Information to support
proposal analysis.
• 215.404–3, Subcontract pricing
considerations.
• 215.404–70, DD Form 1547, Record
of Weighted Guidelines Method
Application.
• 215.404–71–2(b), (d), and (e),
Performance risk.
• 215.404–71–3(b), (d), (e), and (f)(3),
Contract type risk and working capital
adjustment.
• 215.404–71–4, Facilities capital
employed (partial relocation).
• 215.404–71–5(b) and (c), Cost
efficiency factor.
• 215.404–76, Reporting profit and
fee statistics.
• 215.406–1, Prenegotiation
objectives.
• 215.406–3, Documenting the
negotiation.
• 215.407–4, Should-cost review.
• 215.407–5–70(e) and (f), Estimating
systems ‘‘ Disclosure, maintenance, and
review requirements.
• 215.470(b) and (c), Estimated data
prices, except that the first sentence of
(b) remains in DFARS, and is revised for
clarity.
• 230.201–5(a)(1), Waiver (partial
relocation).
• 253.215–70, DD Form 1547, Record
of Weighted Guidelines Application.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
75442
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Proposed Rules
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule updates, clarifies, and
relocates DFARS text, but makes no
significant change to DoD contracting
policy. Therefore, DoD has not
performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis. DoD invites
comments from small businesses and
other interested parties. DoD will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the affected DFARS subparts
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such
comments should be submitted
separately and should cite DFARS Case
2003-D014.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply, because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215,
230, 252, and 253
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48
CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253 as
follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
2. Section 215.403–1 is revised to read
as follows:
215.403–1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or
pricing data.
(c) See PGI 215.403–1(c) for guidance
on standards for exceptions from cost or
pricing data requirements.
(3) Commercial items. By November
30th of each year, the departments and
agencies shall provide a report to the
Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy (DPAP), ATTN:
DPAP/Policy, of all commercial item
exceptions granted under FAR 15.403–
1(b)(3), during the previous fiscal year,
for any contract, subcontract, or
modification expected to have a value of
$15,000,000 or more. See PGI 215.403–
1(c)(3) for the format and guidance for
the report. The Director, DPAP, will
submit a consolidated report to the
congressional defense committees.
(4) Waivers. (A) The head of the
contracting activity may apply the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
exceptional circumstances authority
when a determination is made that:
(1) The property or services cannot
reasonably be obtained under the
contract, subcontract, or modification,
without the granting of the waiver;
(2) The price can be determined to be
fair and reasonable without the
submission of certified cost or pricing
data; and
(3) There are demonstrated benefits to
granting the waiver.
(B) By November 30th of each year,
the departments and agencies shall
provide a report to the Director, DPAP,
ATTN: DPAP/Policy, of all waivers
granted under FAR 15.403–1(b)(4),
during the previous fiscal year, for any
contract, subcontract, or modification
expected to have a value of $15,000,000
or more. See PGI 215.403–1(c)(4)(B) for
the format and guidance for the report.
The Director, DPAP, will submit a
consolidated report to the congressional
defense committees.
(C) DoD has waived the requirement
for submission of cost or pricing data for
the Canadian Commercial Corporation
and its subcontractors.
(D) DoD has waived cost or pricing
data requirements for nonprofit
organizations (including educational
institutions) on cost-reimbursement-nofee contracts. The contracting officer
shall require:
(1) Submission of information other
than cost or pricing data to the extent
necessary to determine price
reasonableness and cost realism; and
(2) Cost or pricing data from
subcontractors that are not nonprofit
organizations when the subcontractor’s
proposal exceeds the cost or pricing
data threshold at FAR 15.403–4(a)(1).
3. Section 215.403–5 is revised to read
as follows:
215.403–5 Instructions for submission of
cost or pricing data or information other
than cost or pricing data.
When the solicitation requires
contractor compliance with the
Contractor Cost Data Reporting System,
follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–5.
215.404–1
[Amended]
4. Section 215.404–1 is amended by
removing paragraph (d).
5. Sections 215.404–2 and 215.404–3
are revised to read as follows:
215.404–2
analysis.
Information to support proposal
See PGI 215.404–2 for guidance on
obtaining field pricing or audit
assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
215.404–3 Subcontract pricing
considerations.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–3 when reviewing a
subcontractor’s proposal.
6. Section 215.404–4 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(1) introductory
text to read as follows:
215.404–4
Profit.
(b) * * *
(1) Contracting officers shall use a
structured approach for developing a
prenegotiation profit or fee objective on
any negotiated contract action when
cost or pricing data is obtained, except
for cost-plus-award-fee contracts (see
215.404–74, 216.405–2, and FAR
16.405–2) or contracts with Federally
Funded Research and Development
Centers (FFRDCs) (see 215.404–75).
There are three structured approaches—
*
*
*
*
*
7. Section 215.404–70 is revised to
read as follows:
215.404–70 DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines Method Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–70 for use of DD Form 1547
whenever a structured approach to
profit analysis is required.
8. Section 215.404–71–2 is amended
by revising paragraphs (b), (d), and (e)
to read as follows:
215.404–71–2
Performance risk.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Determination. See PGI 215.404–
71–2(b) for guidance on determining the
risk factors to be included in DD Form
1547.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Evaluation criteria for technical.
See PGI 215.404–71–2(d) for guidance
on evaluation criteria and examples of
when above and below normal values
should be applied.
(e) Evaluation criteria for
management/cost control. See PGI
215.404–71–2(e) for guidance on
evaluation criteria and examples of
when above and below normal values
should be applied.
9. Section 215.404–71–3 is amended
by revising paragraphs (b), (d), (e), and
(f)(3) to read as follows:
215.404–71–3 Contract type risk and
working capital adjustment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Determination. See PGI 215.404–
71–3(b) for guidance on determining the
risk factors to be included in DD Form
1547.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Evaluation criteria. See PGI
215.404–71–3(d) for guidance on
evaluation criteria and examples of
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Proposed Rules
when above and below normal values
should be applied.
(e) Costs financed. See PGI 215.404–
71–3(e) for guidance for determining the
amount included in DD Form 1547.
(f) * * *
(3) An example is available at PGI
215.404–71–3(f)(3).
10. Section 215.404–71–4 is revised to
read as follows:
215.404–71–4
Facilities capital employed.
(a) Description. This factor focuses on
encouraging and rewarding capital
investment in facilities that benefit DoD.
It recognizes both the facilities capital
that the contractor will employ in
contract performance and the
contractor’s commitment to improving
productivity.
(b) Contract facilities capital
estimates. The contracting officer shall
estimate the facilities capital cost of
money and capital employed using:
(1) An analysis of the appropriate
Forms CASB-CMF and cost of money
factors (48 CFR 9904.414 and FAR
31.205–10); and
(2) DD Form 1861, Contract Facilities
Capital Cost of Money.
(c) Use of DD Form 1861. See PGI
215.404–71–4(c) for information on the
purpose of DD Form 1861 and
instructions for completion of the form.
(d) Preaward facilities capital
applications. Follow the procedures at
PGI 215.404–71–4(d) for establishing
cost and price objectives.
(e) Determination. See PGI 215.404–
71–4(e) for guidance on determining the
amounts and values to be included in
DD Form 1547.
(f) Values: Normal and designated
ranges.
12. Section 215.404–73 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
215.404–73 Alternate structured
approaches.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall reduce
the overall prenegotiation profit
objective by the amount of facilities
capital cost of money under Cost
Accounting Standard 414, Cost of
Money as an Element of the Cost of
Facilities Capital (48 CFR 9904.414).
Cost of money under CAS 417, Cost of
Money as an Element of the Cost of
Capital Assets Under Construction (48
CFR 9904.417), should not be used to
reduce the overall prenegotiation profit
objective. The profit amount in the
negotiation summary of the DD Form
1547 must be net of the offset.
*
*
*
*
*
13. Sections 215.404–76, 215.406–1,
and 215.406–3 are revised to read as
follows:
215.404–76
statistics.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–76 for reporting profit and fee
statistics.
215.406–1
Asset type
Land .........................
Buildings ..................
Equipment ...............
0% ..........
0% ..........
17.5% .....
N/A.
N/A.
10% to
25%.
(g) Evaluation criteria. See PGI
215.404–71–4(g) for guidance on
evaluation criteria and examples of
when above and below normal values
should be applied.
11. Section 215.404–71–5 is amended
by revising paragraph (b) and removing
paragraph (c). The revised text reads as
follows:
215.404–71–5
Cost efficiency factor.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) See PGI 215.404–71–5(b) for
guidance on appropriate use of the
special cost efficiency factor.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
Prenegotiation objectives.
See PGI 215.406–1 for guidance on
establishing prenegotiation objectives.
215.406–3
Documenting the negotiation.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.406–3 for documenting the
negotiation.
14. Section 215.407–4 is revised to
read as follows:
215.407–4
Designated
range
Normal
value
Reporting profit and fee
Should-cost review.
See PGI 215.407–4 for guidance on
determining whether to perform a
program or overhead should-cost
review.
15. Section 215.407–5–70 is amended
by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (e),
and (f) to read as follows:
215.407–5–70 Disclosure, maintenance,
and review requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) Acceptable estimating system is
defined in the clause at 252.215–7002,
Cost Estimating System Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) DoD policy is that all contractors
have acceptable estimating systems that
consistently produce well-supported
proposals that are acceptable as a basis
for negotiation of fair and reasonable
prices.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75443
(e) Review procedures. Follow the
procedures at PGI 215.407–5–70(e) for
establishing and conducting estimating
system reviews.
(f) Disposition of survey team
findings. Follow the procedures at PGI
215.407–5–70(f) for disposition of the
survey team findings.
*
*
*
*
*
16. Section 215.470 is amended by
revising paragraph (b), removing
paragraph (c), and redesignating
paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). The
revised text reads as follows:
215.470
Estimated data prices.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) When data are required to be
delivered under a contract, include DD
Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements
List, in the solicitation. See PGI
215.470(b) for guidance on the use of
DD Form 1423.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 230—COST ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
17. Section 230.201–5 is revised to
read as follows:
230.201–5
Waiver.
(a)(1)(A) The military departments
and the Director, Defense Procurement
and Acquisition Policy, Office of the
Under Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics):
(1) May grant CAS waivers that meet
the conditions in FAR 30.201–5(b)(1);
and
(2) May grant CAS waivers that meet
the conditions in FAR 30.201–5(b)(2),
provided the cognizant Federal agency
official granting the waiver determines
that:
(i) The property or services cannot
reasonably be obtained under the
contract, subcontract, or modification,
as applicable, without granting the
waiver;
(ii) The price can be determined to be
fair and reasonable without the
application of the Cost Accounting
Standards; and
(iii) There are demonstrated benefits
to granting the waiver.
(B) Follow the procedures at PGI
230.201–5(a)(1) for submitting waiver
requests to the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy.
(2) The military departments shall not
delegate CAS waiver authority below
the individual responsible for issuing
contracting policy for the department.
(e) By November 30th of each year,
the military departments shall provide a
report to the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
75444
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 243 / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 / Proposed Rules
ATTN: DPAP/Policy, of all waivers
granted under FAR 30.201–5(a), during
the previous fiscal year, for any
contract, subcontract, or modification
expected to have a value of $15,000,000
or more. See PGI 230.201–5(e) for the
format and guidance for the report. The
Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy, will submit a
consolidated report to the CAS Board
and the congressional defense
committees.
Subparts 230.70 and 230.71—
[Removed]
18. Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 are
removed.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
19. Section 252.215–7002 is amended
as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:11 Dec 19, 2005
Jkt 208001
a. By revising the clause date;
b. In paragraph (a), by revising the
paragraph heading and adding a
definition of ‘‘Acceptable estimating
system’’; and
c. By revising paragraph (b). The
revised and added text reads as follows:
252.215–7002 Cost estimating system
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 253—FORMS
COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM
REQUIREMENTS (XXX 2005)
(a) Definitions.
Acceptable estimating system means
an estimating system that—
(1) Is maintained, reliable and
consistently applied;
(2) Produces verifiable, supportable
and documented cost estimates that are
an acceptable basis for negotiation of
fair and reasonable prices;
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) Is consistent with and integrated
with the Contractor’s related
management systems; and
(4) Is subject to applicable financial
control systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) General. The Contractor shall
establish, maintain, and comply with an
acceptable estimating system.
*
*
*
*
*
20. Section 253.215–70 is revised to
read as follows:
253.215–70 DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI
253.215–70 for completing DD Form
1547.
[FR Doc. 05–24219 Filed 12–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 243 (Tuesday, December 20, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75440-75444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24219]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
[DFARS Case 2003-D014]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract
Pricing and Cost Accounting Standards
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD).
[[Page 75441]]
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text addressing contract
pricing matters and cost accounting standards administration. This
proposed rule is a result of a transformation initiative undertaken by
DoD to dramatically change the purpose and content of the DFARS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before February 21, 2006, to be
considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2003-D014,
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Defense Acquisition Regulations Web Site: https://
emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2003-D014 in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: (703) 602-0350.
Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr.
Bill Sain, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP(DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3062.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street, Arlington, VA
22202-3402.
All comments received will be posted to https://
emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/dfars.nsf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bill Sain, (703) 602-0293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
DFARS Transformation is a major DoD initiative to dramatically
change the purpose and content of the DFARS. The objective is to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process,
while allowing the acquisition workforce the flexibility to innovate.
The transformed DFARS will contain only requirements of law, DoD-wide
policies, delegations of FAR authorities, deviations from FAR
requirements, and policies/procedures that have a significant effect
beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD or a significant cost
or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. Additional
information on the DFARS Transformation initiative is available at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/transformation/index.htm.
This proposed rule is a result of the DFARS Transformation
initiative. The proposed DFARS changes include:
Addition of text at 215.403-1(c) and 230.201-5(a)(1) to
implement Section 817 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107-314) regarding exceptions to cost or
pricing data requirements and waiver of cost accounting standards.
Deletion of 215.404-1(d), Cost realism analysis, because
FAR 15.404-1 contains sufficient policy on this subject.
Deletion of unnecessary introductory text at redesignated
215.404-71-4(f), Facilities capital employed, Values: Normal and
designated ranges.
Deletion of the definition of ``Acceptable estimating
system'' from 215.407-5-70(a)(1), and relocation of the definition to
the contract clause at 252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System
Requirements; addition of a cross-reference in 215.407-5-70(a)(1) to
the relocated definition; elimination of 215.407-5-70(b)(1)(iii) and
(iv) and relocation of the language to the new definition at 252.215-
7002(a); and deletion of duplicative language at 252.215-7002(b).
Revision of 230.201-5(a)(1)(A) to address the authority of
the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, to grant cost
accounting standards waivers, in accordance with Section 802 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Pub. L. 106-
65).
Removal of 230.7000, Contract facilities capital
estimates; 230.7001, Use of DD Form 1861; 230.7002, Preaward facilities
capital applications; and 230.7004-2, DD Form 1861, and relocation of
text on these subjects to 215.404-4, Profit, since these sections
pertain to the calculation of weighted guidelines for profit, rather
than cost accounting standards.
Elimination of 230.7003, Postaward facilities capital
applications, and 230.7004-1, Forms CASB-CMF, since these sections
duplicate CAS 414, Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of
Facilities Capital; FAR 31.205-10, Cost of Money; and the implementing
contract clauses.
Elimination of the definitions at 230.7100(a) and (b),
since these definitions are provided in the cost accounting standards
(CAS); elimination of the definition at 230.7100(c), because it
conflicts with CAS; and elimination of the definition at 230.7100(d),
because it is unnecessary.
Elimination of 230.7101, Calculations, and 230.7102,
Determining imputed cost of money, because they are adequately covered
in CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital Assets
Under Construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
Removal of 230.7103, Preaward capital employed
application, and relocation of that coverage to 215.404-73(b)(2)(i),
Offsets for facilities capital cost of money, since it applies to
offsets in determining profit, rather than cost accounting standards.
Relocation of the following text to the new DFARS
companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI).
Additional information on PGI is available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/
dpap/dars/pgi.
215.403-1(c)(1), Adequate price competition.
215.403-5, Instructions for submission of cost or pricing
data or information other than cost or pricing data.
215.404-2, Information to support proposal analysis.
215.404-3, Subcontract pricing considerations.
215.404-70, DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines
Method Application.
215.404-71-2(b), (d), and (e), Performance risk.
215.404-71-3(b), (d), (e), and (f)(3), Contract type risk
and working capital adjustment.
215.404-71-4, Facilities capital employed (partial
relocation).
215.404-71-5(b) and (c), Cost efficiency factor.
215.404-76, Reporting profit and fee statistics.
215.406-1, Prenegotiation objectives.
215.406-3, Documenting the negotiation.
215.407-4, Should-cost review.
215.407-5-70(e) and (f), Estimating systems `` Disclosure,
maintenance, and review requirements.
215.470(b) and (c), Estimated data prices, except that the
first sentence of (b) remains in DFARS, and is revised for clarity.
230.201-5(a)(1), Waiver (partial relocation).
253.215-70, DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines
Application.
This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
[[Page 75442]]
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because the rule updates, clarifies, and relocates DFARS text,
but makes no significant change to DoD contracting policy. Therefore,
DoD has not performed an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. DoD
invites comments from small businesses and other interested parties.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
affected DFARS subparts in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments
should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case 2003-D014.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply, because the rule does
not impose any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and
253 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
2. Section 215.403-1 is revised to read as follows:
215.403-1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or pricing data.
(c) See PGI 215.403-1(c) for guidance on standards for exceptions
from cost or pricing data requirements.
(3) Commercial items. By November 30th of each year, the
departments and agencies shall provide a report to the Director,
Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP), ATTN: DPAP/Policy,
of all commercial item exceptions granted under FAR 15.403-1(b)(3),
during the previous fiscal year, for any contract, subcontract, or
modification expected to have a value of $15,000,000 or more. See PGI
215.403-1(c)(3) for the format and guidance for the report. The
Director, DPAP, will submit a consolidated report to the congressional
defense committees.
(4) Waivers. (A) The head of the contracting activity may apply the
exceptional circumstances authority when a determination is made that:
(1) The property or services cannot reasonably be obtained under
the contract, subcontract, or modification, without the granting of the
waiver;
(2) The price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without
the submission of certified cost or pricing data; and
(3) There are demonstrated benefits to granting the waiver.
(B) By November 30th of each year, the departments and agencies
shall provide a report to the Director, DPAP, ATTN: DPAP/Policy, of all
waivers granted under FAR 15.403-1(b)(4), during the previous fiscal
year, for any contract, subcontract, or modification expected to have a
value of $15,000,000 or more. See PGI 215.403-1(c)(4)(B) for the format
and guidance for the report. The Director, DPAP, will submit a
consolidated report to the congressional defense committees.
(C) DoD has waived the requirement for submission of cost or
pricing data for the Canadian Commercial Corporation and its
subcontractors.
(D) DoD has waived cost or pricing data requirements for nonprofit
organizations (including educational institutions) on cost-
reimbursement-no-fee contracts. The contracting officer shall require:
(1) Submission of information other than cost or pricing data to
the extent necessary to determine price reasonableness and cost
realism; and
(2) Cost or pricing data from subcontractors that are not nonprofit
organizations when the subcontractor's proposal exceeds the cost or
pricing data threshold at FAR 15.403-4(a)(1).
3. Section 215.403-5 is revised to read as follows:
215.403-5 Instructions for submission of cost or pricing data or
information other than cost or pricing data.
When the solicitation requires contractor compliance with the
Contractor Cost Data Reporting System, follow the procedures at PGI
215.403-5.
215.404-1 [Amended]
4. Section 215.404-1 is amended by removing paragraph (d).
5. Sections 215.404-2 and 215.404-3 are revised to read as follows:
215.404-2 Information to support proposal analysis.
See PGI 215.404-2 for guidance on obtaining field pricing or audit
assistance.
215.404-3 Subcontract pricing considerations.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-3 when reviewing a
subcontractor's proposal.
6. Section 215.404-4 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)
introductory text to read as follows:
215.404-4 Profit.
(b) * * *
(1) Contracting officers shall use a structured approach for
developing a prenegotiation profit or fee objective on any negotiated
contract action when cost or pricing data is obtained, except for cost-
plus-award-fee contracts (see 215.404-74, 216.405-2, and FAR 16.405-2)
or contracts with Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
(FFRDCs) (see 215.404-75). There are three structured approaches--
* * * * *
7. Section 215.404-70 is revised to read as follows:
215.404-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Method
Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-70 for use of DD Form 1547
whenever a structured approach to profit analysis is required.
8. Section 215.404-71-2 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (d),
and (e) to read as follows:
215.404-71-2 Performance risk.
* * * * *
(b) Determination. See PGI 215.404-71-2(b) for guidance on
determining the risk factors to be included in DD Form 1547.
* * * * *
(d) Evaluation criteria for technical. See PGI 215.404-71-2(d) for
guidance on evaluation criteria and examples of when above and below
normal values should be applied.
(e) Evaluation criteria for management/cost control. See PGI
215.404-71-2(e) for guidance on evaluation criteria and examples of
when above and below normal values should be applied.
9. Section 215.404-71-3 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (d),
(e), and (f)(3) to read as follows:
215.404-71-3 Contract type risk and working capital adjustment.
* * * * *
(b) Determination. See PGI 215.404-71-3(b) for guidance on
determining the risk factors to be included in DD Form 1547.
* * * * *
(d) Evaluation criteria. See PGI 215.404-71-3(d) for guidance on
evaluation criteria and examples of
[[Page 75443]]
when above and below normal values should be applied.
(e) Costs financed. See PGI 215.404-71-3(e) for guidance for
determining the amount included in DD Form 1547.
(f) * * *
(3) An example is available at PGI 215.404-71-3(f)(3).
10. Section 215.404-71-4 is revised to read as follows:
215.404-71-4 Facilities capital employed.
(a) Description. This factor focuses on encouraging and rewarding
capital investment in facilities that benefit DoD. It recognizes both
the facilities capital that the contractor will employ in contract
performance and the contractor's commitment to improving productivity.
(b) Contract facilities capital estimates. The contracting officer
shall estimate the facilities capital cost of money and capital
employed using:
(1) An analysis of the appropriate Forms CASB-CMF and cost of money
factors (48 CFR 9904.414 and FAR 31.205-10); and
(2) DD Form 1861, Contract Facilities Capital Cost of Money.
(c) Use of DD Form 1861. See PGI 215.404-71-4(c) for information on
the purpose of DD Form 1861 and instructions for completion of the
form.
(d) Preaward facilities capital applications. Follow the procedures
at PGI 215.404-71-4(d) for establishing cost and price objectives.
(e) Determination. See PGI 215.404-71-4(e) for guidance on
determining the amounts and values to be included in DD Form 1547.
(f) Values: Normal and designated ranges.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset type Normal value Designated range
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land............................ 0%................ N/A.
Buildings....................... 0%................ N/A.
Equipment....................... 17.5%............. 10% to 25%.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(g) Evaluation criteria. See PGI 215.404-71-4(g) for guidance on
evaluation criteria and examples of when above and below normal values
should be applied.
11. Section 215.404-71-5 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and
removing paragraph (c). The revised text reads as follows:
215.404-71-5 Cost efficiency factor.
* * * * *
(b) See PGI 215.404-71-5(b) for guidance on appropriate use of the
special cost efficiency factor.
12. Section 215.404-73 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i)
to read as follows:
215.404-73 Alternate structured approaches.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall reduce the overall prenegotiation
profit objective by the amount of facilities capital cost of money
under Cost Accounting Standard 414, Cost of Money as an Element of the
Cost of Facilities Capital (48 CFR 9904.414). Cost of money under CAS
417, Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital Assets Under
Construction (48 CFR 9904.417), should not be used to reduce the
overall prenegotiation profit objective. The profit amount in the
negotiation summary of the DD Form 1547 must be net of the offset.
* * * * *
13. Sections 215.404-76, 215.406-1, and 215.406-3 are revised to
read as follows:
215.404-76 Reporting profit and fee statistics.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-76 for reporting profit and
fee statistics.
215.406-1 Prenegotiation objectives.
See PGI 215.406-1 for guidance on establishing prenegotiation
objectives.
215.406-3 Documenting the negotiation.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.406-3 for documenting the
negotiation.
14. Section 215.407-4 is revised to read as follows:
215.407-4 Should-cost review.
See PGI 215.407-4 for guidance on determining whether to perform a
program or overhead should-cost review.
15. Section 215.407-5-70 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1),
(b)(1), (e), and (f) to read as follows:
215.407-5-70 Disclosure, maintenance, and review requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) Acceptable estimating system is defined in the clause at
252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) DoD policy is that all contractors have acceptable estimating
systems that consistently produce well-supported proposals that are
acceptable as a basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable prices.
* * * * *
(e) Review procedures. Follow the procedures at PGI 215.407-5-70(e)
for establishing and conducting estimating system reviews.
(f) Disposition of survey team findings. Follow the procedures at
PGI 215.407-5-70(f) for disposition of the survey team findings.
* * * * *
16. Section 215.470 is amended by revising paragraph (b), removing
paragraph (c), and redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). The
revised text reads as follows:
215.470 Estimated data prices.
* * * * *
(b) When data are required to be delivered under a contract,
include DD Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements List, in the
solicitation. See PGI 215.470(b) for guidance on the use of DD Form
1423.
* * * * *
PART 230--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
17. Section 230.201-5 is revised to read as follows:
230.201-5 Waiver.
(a)(1)(A) The military departments and the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics):
(1) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-
5(b)(1); and
(2) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-
5(b)(2), provided the cognizant Federal agency official granting the
waiver determines that:
(i) The property or services cannot reasonably be obtained under
the contract, subcontract, or modification, as applicable, without
granting the waiver;
(ii) The price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without
the application of the Cost Accounting Standards; and
(iii) There are demonstrated benefits to granting the waiver.
(B) Follow the procedures at PGI 230.201-5(a)(1) for submitting
waiver requests to the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy.
(2) The military departments shall not delegate CAS waiver
authority below the individual responsible for issuing contracting
policy for the department.
(e) By November 30th of each year, the military departments shall
provide a report to the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy,
[[Page 75444]]
ATTN: DPAP/Policy, of all waivers granted under FAR 30.201-5(a), during
the previous fiscal year, for any contract, subcontract, or
modification expected to have a value of $15,000,000 or more. See PGI
230.201-5(e) for the format and guidance for the report. The Director,
Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, will submit a consolidated
report to the CAS Board and the congressional defense committees.
Subparts 230.70 and 230.71--[Removed]
18. Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 are removed.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
19. Section 252.215-7002 is amended as follows:
a. By revising the clause date;
b. In paragraph (a), by revising the paragraph heading and adding a
definition of ``Acceptable estimating system''; and
c. By revising paragraph (b). The revised and added text reads as
follows:
252.215-7002 Cost estimating system requirements.
* * * * *
COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (XXX 2005)
(a) Definitions.
Acceptable estimating system means an estimating system that--
(1) Is maintained, reliable and consistently applied;
(2) Produces verifiable, supportable and documented cost estimates
that are an acceptable basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable
prices;
(3) Is consistent with and integrated with the Contractor's related
management systems; and
(4) Is subject to applicable financial control systems.
* * * * *
(b) General. The Contractor shall establish, maintain, and comply
with an acceptable estimating system.
* * * * *
PART 253--FORMS
20. Section 253.215-70 is revised to read as follows:
253.215-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI 253.215-70 for completing DD Form
1547.
[FR Doc. 05-24219 Filed 12-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P