Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes, 75236-75238 [E5-7494]
Download as PDF
75236
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
removing the icing-related guidance
from AC 25–7A because that material is
addressed by the NPRM Notice No. 05–
10, ‘‘Airplane Performance and
Handling Qualities In Icing Conditions’’
and proposed AC 25.21–1X,
‘‘Performance And Handling
Characteristics In The Icing Conditions
Specified In part 25, Appendix C.’’
Since publication of that notice, the
FAA has received a request that the
comment period for the notice be
extended past its original closing date of
January 3, 2006, to allow more time in
which to study the proposal and to
prepare comments on this very
important issue.
Extension of Comment Period
The FAA has reviewed the request for
consideration of an additional amount
of time to comment on proposed AC
25.21–1X, and has determined that
extending the comment period would be
in the public interest and that good
cause exists for taking this action.
Accordingly, the comment period of
Notice of availability of proposed AC
25.21–1X, and request for comments, is
extended until February 2, 2006.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 9, 2005.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–24157 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement:
Alameda and Contra Costa Counties,
CA
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that the
Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed project to construct a
fourth bore to the Caldecott Tunnel
between State Route 24/Broadway
interchange in the City of Oakland in
Alameda County and the State Route
24/Camino Pablo interchange in the City
of Orinda in Contra Costa County,
California is being withdrawn; and an
Environmental Assessment (EA) in lieu
of an EIS is being prepared for this
proposed highway project.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Leland W. Dong, Project Development
Engineer, Federal Highway
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Administration, California Division, 650
Capitol Mall, Suite 4–100, Sacramento,
California 95814, Telephone: (916) 498–
5860 or to Ms. Cristina Ferraz, Regional
Project Manager, California Department
of Transportation, 111 Grand Avenue,
Oakland CA 94623–0660, Telephone:
(510) 286–3890.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA, in cooperation with the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), conducted studies of the
potential environmental impacts
associated with the proposed highway
project to construct a fourth bore to the
Caldecott Tunnel between Alameda and
Contra Costa Counties, California. A
NOI was published in the Federal
Register/Volume 67/No. 225/November
21, 2002. Subsequently, during the
course of conducting studies and
coordinating with regulatory and
resource agencies for this proposed
project, it was determined that the
potential environmental issues that led
to issuing the Notice of Intent were not
significant. In addition, it was
determined that changes to avoid or
minimize potential impacts identified in
early scoping can be incorporated into
the proposed project. Changes to
minimizing impacts were achieved by
eliminating alternative alignments that
had higher impacts, by reducing the
number of lanes to either two or three
lanes in lieu of four lanes thereby
reducing the tunnel footprint, and by
evaluating alignments that will not
require the acquisition of additional
right-of-way or acquisition of
recreational or historic properties
protected by section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966.
The FHWA has determined that the
proposed project is not anticipated to
result in significant impacts to the
environment; that an EA would be an
appropriate environmental document
for the project; and that the Notice of
Intent for this project is being
withdrawn.
The EA will be available for public
inspection prior to the public meeting
for the proposed project. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed
project and the determination that an
EA is the appropriate environmental
document should be directed to the
FHWA or Caltrans at the addresses
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Research
Planning and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued on: December 13, 2005.
Leland W. Dong,
Project Development Engineer, Federal
Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 05–24193 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2005–22905]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of applications for
exemption from the diabetes standard;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of
applications from six individuals for
exemptions from the prohibition against
persons with insulin-treated diabetes
mellitus (ITDM) operating commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate
commerce. If granted, the exemptions
would enable these individuals with
ITDM to operate as drivers of
commercial motor vehicles in interstate
commerce.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods. Please
label your comments with DOT DMS
Docket Number FMCSA–2005–22905.
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
All submissions must include the
agency name and docket number for this
notice. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the
Privacy Act heading under Regulatory
Notices. To read background documents
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
or comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov or to Room PL–401 on the
plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
Qualifications Division, (202) 366–4001,
FMCSA, Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20590–0001. Office hours are from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments: The DMS is
generally available 24 hours each day,
except when announced system
maintenance requires a brief
interruption in service. You can get
electronic submission and retrieval help
guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section of
the DMS Web site. If you want us to
notify you that we received your
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard. An acknowledgement page
appears after submitting comments online and can be printed to document
submission of comments.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s complete Privacy Act
statement in the Federal
Registerpublished April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e),
the FMCSA may grant an exemption for
a 2-year period if it finds ‘‘such
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.’’ The statute
also allows the agency to renew
exemptions at the end of the 2-year
period. The six individuals listed in this
notice have recently requested an
exemption from the diabetes prohibition
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), which applies to
drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce.
Accordingly, the agency will evaluate
the qualifications of each applicant to
determine whether granting the
exemption will achieve the required
level of safety mandated by the statute.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Qualifications of Applicants
Daryle W. Belcher
Mr. Belcher, 63, has had ITDM since
2000. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘He has been
extremely willing to properly monitor
and manage his diabetes.’’ Mr. Belcher
meets the requirements of the vision
standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2005
and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) from
Texas.
William H. Gardner
Mr. Gardner, 34, has had ITDM since
1981. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘He is stable on
the current insulin regimen,
understands diabetes management and
monitoring, and is able to drive a
commercial motor vehicle safely.’’ He
holds a Class A CDL from California.
Roy G. Hill
Mr. Hill, 43, has had ITDM since
1975. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘Mr. Hill has
demonstrated the ability to monitor and
manage his diabetes.’’ Mr. Hill meets the
requirements of the vision standard at
49 CFR 391.41 (b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2005
and certified that there is no evidence
of diabetic retinopathy He holds a Class
A CDL from Kentucky.
Anthony D. Izzi
Mr. Izzi, 45, has had ITDM since
2000. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘He
demonstrates willingness to properly
monitor and manage his diabetes
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75237
without difficulty and with success.’’
Mr. Izzi meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41
(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined
him in 2005 and certified that he does
not have diabetic retinopathy He holds
an operator’s license from Rhode Island.
Ronald D. Paul
Mr. Paul, 58, has had ITDM since
1980. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘Mr. Paul has
demonstrated willingness to properly
monitor and manage his diabetes.’’ Mr.
Paul meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41
(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined
him in 2005 and certified that he does
have stable mild background diabetic
retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL
from New Hampshire.
Kenneth L. Pogue
Mr. Pogue, 46, has had ITDM since
1997. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of
consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in
impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5
years. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2005 and stated, ‘‘Mr. Pogue is
well educated regarding his diabetes
and its management. Mr. Pogue has
demonstrated willingness to properly
monitor and manage his diabetes.’’ Mr.
Pogue meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
His ophthalmologist examined him in
2005 and stated, ‘‘There was no
evidence of diabetic retinopathy
present.’’ He holds a Class A CDL from
Missouri.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), the FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested
persons on the exemption petitions
described in this notice. We will
consider all comments received before
the close of business on the closing date
indicated earlier in the notice.
FMCSA notes that Section 4129 of the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible and
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
requires the Secretary to begin within 90
days of enactment to revise the
September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), notice
of final disposition, to allow drivers
who use insulin to treat diabetes to
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75238
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.1
The revision must provide for
individual assessment of drivers with
diabetes mellitus, and be consistent
with the criteria described in section
4018 of TEA–21.
Section 4129 requires two substantive
changes to be made in the current
exemption process set out in the
September 3, 2003 Notice. As required
by section 4129(b) and (c), the changes
are: (1) Elimination of the requirement
for three years of experience operating
CMVs while being treated with insulin;
and (2) establishment of a specified
minimum period of insulin dose to
demonstrate stable control of diabetes
before being allowed to operate a CMV.
In order to accomplish these changes
within the 90-day time frame
established by section 4129, FMCSA
made immediate revisions to the
diabetes exemption program established
by the September 3, 2003 Notice. These
revisions were those necessary to
respond to the specific changes
mandated by section 4129 while
continuing to ensure that operation of
CMVs by drivers with ITDM will
achieve the necessary level of safety as
also required by section 4129(a).
Section 4129(d) also directed FMCSA
to ensure that drivers of CMVs with
ITDM are not held to a higher standard
than other drivers, with the exception of
limited operating, monitoring and
medical requirements that are deemed
medically necessary. FMCSA concluded
that all of the operating, monitoring and
medical requirements set out in the
September 3, 2003 Notice, except as
modified, were in compliance with
section 4129(d). All of the requirements
set out in the September 3, 2003 Notice,
except as modified in the Notice in the
Federal Register on November 8, 2005
(70 FR 67777), remain in effect.
Issued on: December 13, 2005.
Annette M. Sandberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E5–7494 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
1 Section 4129(a) refers to the 2003 Notice as a
‘‘final rule.’’ However, the 2003 Notice did not issue
a ‘‘final rule,’’ but did establish the procedures and
standards for issuing exemptions for drivers with
ITDM.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34790]
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad
Corporation and Iowa, Chicago &
Eastern Railroad Corporation—
Temporary Trackage Rights
Exemption—BNSF Railway Company
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has
agreed to grant temporary trackage
rights to the Dakota, Minnesota &
Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM&E)
and the Iowa, Chicago & Eastern
Railroad Corporation (IC&E) (DM&E and
IC&E are referred to collectively as
‘‘User’’) between milepost (MP) 146.0 on
BNSF’s Corson Subdivision at Sioux
Falls, SD, and MP 705.5 on BNSF’s
Aberdeen Subdivision at Wolsey, SD, a
distance of 149.8 miles, solely for the
overhead movement of User’s business
cars (and engines and end-of-train
devices required to operate those
business cars). The trackage rights run:
between Sioux Falls, SD, and Canton,
SD; between Canton, SD, and Mitchell,
SD; and between Mitchell, SD, and
Wolsey, SD. These trackage rights were
scheduled to be effective on or after
December 6, 2005, and the authorization
for these trackage rights will expire one
year after the effective date. However,
although the term of the temporary
trackage rights agreement is for no more
than one year, BNSF has also agreed
that, for a period of 10 years from the
effective date of that agreement, BNSF
shall agree to DM&E’s requests to
establish new annual temporary
trackage rights arrangements on the
same terms, provided that the temporary
trackage rights agreement shall not have
terminated early as a result of material
default of DM&E, and further provided
that DM&E shall not otherwise be in
material default of the terms of the
agreement.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the acquisition of
the temporary trackage rights will be
protected by the conditions imposed in
Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.—Trackage
Rights—BN, 354 I.C.C. 605, 610–15
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast
Ry., Inc.—Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C.
653, 664 (1980), and any employees
affected by the discontinuance of those
trackage rights will be protected by the
conditions set out in Oregon Short Line
R. Co.—Abandonment—Goshen, 360
I.C.C. 91, 98–103 (1979).
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(8). If it contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 34790, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 1925
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on User’s
representative: Michael J. Barron, Jr.,
Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker
Drive, Suite 920, Chicago, IL 60606–
2875.
Board decisions and notices are
available on its Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 9, 2005.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–24141 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 34125 (Sub–No.
1)]
South Dakota Railroad Authority—
Acquisition and Operation Modification
Exemption—BNSF Railway Company
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has
agreed to amend existing operating
rights of the South Dakota Department
of Transportation, successor in interest
to the South Dakota Railroad Authority
(User), at Aberdeen, SD, pursuant to an
amendment (Amendment) to an existing
agreement. Pursuant to the Amendment,
BNSF has agreed to grant User and its
designee the right to interchange traffic
on and/or via BNSF-owned trackage at
Aberdeen in connection with the
movement of the traffic to, from, or via
User’s tracks between Kidder, SD, and
Aberdeen, SD (the ‘‘Rail Line’’) pursuant
to the terms outlined below.
(1) Subject to all other applicable
terms and conditions set forth in the
Amendment, BNSF shall permit the
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad
Corporation (DM&E) and User or its
designee to interchange with one
another at Aberdeen Yard via the
Interchange Access Line (as that is
defined in an agreement between the
parties) without restrictions for traffic
which either originates or terminates on
the Rail Line.
(2) Subject to all other applicable
terms and conditions set forth in the
Amendment, BNSF shall permit DM&E
and User or its designee to interchange
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75236-75238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7494]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2005-22905]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of applications for exemption from the diabetes
standard; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of applications from six individuals
for exemptions from the prohibition against persons with insulin-
treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) operating commercial motor vehicles
(CMVs) in interstate commerce. If granted, the exemptions would enable
these individuals with ITDM to operate as drivers of commercial motor
vehicles in interstate commerce.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods.
Please label your comments with DOT DMS Docket Number FMCSA-2005-22905.
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for
this notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to https://dms.dot.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading under Regulatory Notices.
To read background documents
[[Page 75237]]
or comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov or to Room PL-401 on the
plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Chief, Physical
Qualifications Division, (202) 366-4001, FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments: The DMS is generally available 24 hours each day,
except when announced system maintenance requires a brief interruption
in service. You can get electronic submission and retrieval help
guidelines under the ``help'' section of the DMS Web site. If you want
us to notify you that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard. An acknowledgement page
appears after submitting comments on-line and can be printed to
document submission of comments.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's complete Privacy Act statement in the
Federal Registerpublished April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may
visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), the FMCSA may grant an
exemption for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statute also
allows the agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period.
The six individuals listed in this notice have recently requested an
exemption from the diabetes prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), which
applies to drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce. Accordingly, the
agency will evaluate the qualifications of each applicant to determine
whether granting the exemption will achieve the required level of
safety mandated by the statute.
Qualifications of Applicants
Daryle W. Belcher
Mr. Belcher, 63, has had ITDM since 2000. He has had no
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His
endocrinologist examined him in 2005 and stated, ``He has been
extremely willing to properly monitor and manage his diabetes.'' Mr.
Belcher meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2005 and certified
that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B
Commercial Driver's License (CDL) from Texas.
William H. Gardner
Mr. Gardner, 34, has had ITDM since 1981. He has had no
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His
endocrinologist examined him in 2005 and stated, ``He is stable on the
current insulin regimen, understands diabetes management and
monitoring, and is able to drive a commercial motor vehicle safely.''
He holds a Class A CDL from California.
Roy G. Hill
Mr. Hill, 43, has had ITDM since 1975. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2005 and stated, ``Mr. Hill has demonstrated the
ability to monitor and manage his diabetes.'' Mr. Hill meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41 (b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2005 and certified that there is no
evidence of diabetic retinopathy He holds a Class A CDL from Kentucky.
Anthony D. Izzi
Mr. Izzi, 45, has had ITDM since 2000. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2005 and stated, ``He demonstrates willingness to
properly monitor and manage his diabetes without difficulty and with
success.'' Mr. Izzi meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49
CFR 391.41 (b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined him in 2005 and
certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy He holds an
operator's license from Rhode Island.
Ronald D. Paul
Mr. Paul, 58, has had ITDM since 1980. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2005 and stated, ``Mr. Paul has demonstrated
willingness to properly monitor and manage his diabetes.'' Mr. Paul
meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41 (b)(10).
His ophthalmologist examined him in 2005 and certified that he does
have stable mild background diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B
CDL from New Hampshire.
Kenneth L. Pogue
Mr. Pogue, 46, has had ITDM since 1997. He has had no hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 5 years. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2005 and stated, ``Mr. Pogue is well educated regarding
his diabetes and its management. Mr. Pogue has demonstrated willingness
to properly monitor and manage his diabetes.'' Mr. Pogue meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2005 and stated, ``There was no
evidence of diabetic retinopathy present.'' He holds a Class A CDL from
Missouri.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), the FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on the exemption petitions
described in this notice. We will consider all comments received before
the close of business on the closing date indicated earlier in the
notice.
FMCSA notes that Section 4129 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible
and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-
LU) requires the Secretary to begin within 90 days of enactment to
revise the September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), notice of final
disposition, to allow drivers who use insulin to treat diabetes to
[[Page 75238]]
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.\1\ The revision must provide for
individual assessment of drivers with diabetes mellitus, and be
consistent with the criteria described in section 4018 of TEA-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 4129(a) refers to the 2003 Notice as a ``final
rule.'' However, the 2003 Notice did not issue a ``final rule,'' but
did establish the procedures and standards for issuing exemptions
for drivers with ITDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4129 requires two substantive changes to be made in the
current exemption process set out in the September 3, 2003 Notice. As
required by section 4129(b) and (c), the changes are: (1) Elimination
of the requirement for three years of experience operating CMVs while
being treated with insulin; and (2) establishment of a specified
minimum period of insulin dose to demonstrate stable control of
diabetes before being allowed to operate a CMV.
In order to accomplish these changes within the 90-day time frame
established by section 4129, FMCSA made immediate revisions to the
diabetes exemption program established by the September 3, 2003 Notice.
These revisions were those necessary to respond to the specific changes
mandated by section 4129 while continuing to ensure that operation of
CMVs by drivers with ITDM will achieve the necessary level of safety as
also required by section 4129(a).
Section 4129(d) also directed FMCSA to ensure that drivers of CMVs
with ITDM are not held to a higher standard than other drivers, with
the exception of limited operating, monitoring and medical requirements
that are deemed medically necessary. FMCSA concluded that all of the
operating, monitoring and medical requirements set out in the September
3, 2003 Notice, except as modified, were in compliance with section
4129(d). All of the requirements set out in the September 3, 2003
Notice, except as modified in the Notice in the Federal Register on
November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777), remain in effect.
Issued on: December 13, 2005.
Annette M. Sandberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E5-7494 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P