Clinical Studies of Safety and Effectiveness of Orphan Products; Availability of Grants; Request for Applications, 75198-75203 [05-24164]
Download as PDF
75198
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
17. Review of VAERS Anthrax Vaccine
Reports Received Through 8/15/05, and
Adverse Event Reports Submitted to Docket
No. 1980N–0208; dated December 2005.
18. Puziss, M., L. C. Manning, J. W. Lynch,
E. Barclay, I. Abelow, and G. G. Wright,
‘‘Large-Scale Production of Protective
Antigen of Bacillus anthracis in Anaerobic
Cultures,’’ Applied Microbiology, 11(4):330–
334, 1963.
19. Wright, G. G., M. Puziss, and W. B.
Neely, ‘‘Studies on Immunity in Anthrax, IX.
Effect of Variations in Cultural Conditions on
Elaboration of Protective Antigen by Strains
of Bacillus anthracis,’’ Journal of
Bacteriology, 83:515–522, 1962.
¨
20. Nikkila K., K. Hockerstedt, and T. A.
Miettinen, ‘‘Serum and Hepatic Cholestanol,
Squalene and Noncholesterol Sterols in Man:
A Study on Liver Transplantation,’’
Hepatology, 15:863–70, 1992.
21. Matyas, G. R., M. Rao, P. R. Pittman,
R. Burge, I. E. Robbins, N. M. Wassef, B.
Thivierge, and C. R. Alving, ‘‘Detection of
Antibodies to Squalene III. Naturally
Occurring Antibodies to Squalene in Humans
and Mice,’’ Journal of Immunological
Methods, 286: 47–67, 2004.
22. Jernigan, J. A., et al., ‘‘BioterrorismRelated Inhalational Anthrax: The First 10
Cases Reported in the United States,’’
Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7(6):933–944,
2001.
23. Barakat, L. A., et al., ‘‘Fatal Inhalational
Anthrax in a 94–Year-Old Connecticut
Woman,’’ Journal of the American Medical
Association, 287(7):863–868, 2002.
Dated: December 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–24223 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Clinical Studies of Safety and
Effectiveness of Orphan Products;
Availability of Grants; Request for
Applications
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is announcing changes to its
Office of Orphan Products Development
(OPD) grant program for fiscal year (FY)
2007 and FY 2008. This announcement
supersedes the previous announcement
of this program, which was published in
the Federal Register of January 14, 2005
(70 FR 2642). Please note that there is
only one receipt date for FY 2007 and
one receipt date for FY 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
1. Background
OPD was created to identify and
promote the development of orphan
products. Orphan products are drugs,
biologics, medical devices, and foods for
medical purposes that are indicated for
a rare disease or condition (that is, one
with a prevalence, not incidence, of
fewer than 200,000 people in the United
States). Diagnostic tests and vaccines
will qualify only if the U.S. population
of intended use is fewer than 200,000
people per year.
2. Program Research Goals
The goal of FDA’s OPD grant program
is to support the clinical development of
products for use in rare diseases or
conditions where no current therapy
exists or where the product will
improve the existing therapy. FDA
provides grants for clinical studies on
safety and/or effectiveness that will
either result in, or substantially
contribute to, market approval of these
products. Applicants must include, in
the application’s ‘‘Background and
Significance’’ section, documentation to
support the estimated prevalence of the
orphan disease or condition and an
explanation of how the proposed study
will either help gain product approval
or provide essential data needed for
product development. All funded
studies are subject to the requirements
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) and
regulations issued under it.
II. Award Information
Except for applications for studies of
medical foods that do not need
premarket approval, FDA will only
award grants to support premarket
clinical studies to determine safety and
effectiveness for approval under section
505 or 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 355, or
360e) or safety, purity, and potency for
licensing under section 351 of the
Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act)
(42 U.S.C. 262).
FDA will support the clinical studies
covered by this notice under the
authority of section 301 of the PHS Act
(42 U.S.C. 241). FDA’s research program
is described in the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance, No. 93.103.
Applicants for Public Health Service
(PHS) clinical research grants are
encouraged to include minorities and
women in study populations so research
findings can be of benefit to all people
at risk of the disease or condition under
study. It is recommended that
applicants place special emphasis on
including minorities and women in
studies of diseases, disorders, and
conditions that disproportionately affect
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
them. This policy applies to research
subjects of all ages. If women or
minorities are excluded or poorly
represented in clinical research, the
applicant should provide a clear and
compelling rationale that shows
inclusion is inappropriate.
PHS strongly encourages all grant
recipients to provide a smoke-free
workplace and to discourage the use of
all tobacco products. This is consistent
with PHS’ mission to protect and
advance the physical and mental health
of the American people.
FDA is committed to achieving the
health promotion and disease
prevention objectives of ‘‘Healthy
People 2010,’’ a national effort designed
to reduce morbidity and mortality and
to improve quality of life. Applicants
may obtain a paper copy of the ‘‘Healthy
People 2010’’ objectives, vols. I and II,
for $70 ($87.50 foreign) S/N 017–000–
00550–9, by writing to the
Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box
371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250–7954.
Telephone orders can be placed to 202–
512–2250. The document is also
available in CD–ROM format, S/N 017–
001–00549–5 for $19 ($23.50 foreign) as
well as on the Internet at https://
www.healthypeople.gov/. Internet
viewers should proceed to
‘‘Publications’’ (FDA has verified the
Web site and its address, but we are not
responsible for subsequent changes to
the Web site or its address after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register).
1. Award Instrument
Support will be in the form of a grant.
All awards will be subject to all policies
and requirements that govern the
research grant programs of PHS,
including the provisions of 42 CFR part
52 and 45 CFR parts 74 and 92. The
regulations issued under Executive
Order 12372 do not apply to this
program. The National Institutes of
Health (NIH) modular grant program
does not apply to this FDA grant
program. All grant awards are subject to
applicable requirements for clinical
investigations imposed by sections 505,
512, and 515 of the act, section 351 of
the PHS Act, and regulations issued
under any of these sections.
2. Award Amount
Of the estimated FY 2007 funding
($14.2 million), approximately $10
million will fund noncompeting
continuation awards, and approximately
$4.2 million will fund 10 to 12 new
awards subject to availability of funds.
It is anticipated that funding for the
number of noncompeting continuation
awards and new awards in FY 2008 will
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
be similar to FY 2007. The earliest
expected start date for the FY 2007 and
FY 2008 awards will be November 1,
2006, and November 1, 2007,
respectively. Grants will be awarded up
to $200,000 or up to $350,000 in total
(direct plus indirect) costs per year for
up to 3 years. Please note that the dollar
limitation will be total costs, not direct
costs as in previous years.
Applications for the smaller grants
($200,000) may be for phase 1, 2, or 3
studies. Study proposals for the larger
grants ($350,000) must be for studies
continuing in phase 2 or 3 of
investigation. Phase 1 studies include
the initial introduction of an
investigational new drug or device into
humans, are usually conducted in
healthy volunteer subjects, and are
designed to determine the metabolic
and pharmacological actions of the
product in humans, the side effects
including those associated with
increasing drug doses and, if possible, to
gain early evidence on effectiveness.
Phase 2 studies include early controlled
clinical studies conducted to evaluate
the effectiveness of the product for a
particular indication in patients with
the disease or condition and to
determine the common short-term side
effects and risks associated with it.
Phase 3 studies gather more information
about effectiveness and safety that is
necessary to evaluate the overall riskbenefit ratio of the product and to
provide an acceptable basis for product
labeling. Budgets for each year of
requested support may not exceed the
$200,000 or $350,000 total cost limit,
whichever is applicable.
3. Length of Support
The length of support will depend on
the nature of the study. For those
studies with an expected duration of
more than 1 year, a second or third year
of noncompetitive continuation of
support will depend on the following
factors: (1) Performance during the
preceding year, (2) compliance with
regulatory requirements of the
investigational new drug (IND)/
investigational device exemption (IDE),
and (3) availability of Federal funds.
4. Funding Plan
In addition to the requirement for an
active IND/IDE discussed in section
V.1.B.(4) of this document,
documentation of assurances with the
Office of Human Research Protection
(OHRP) (see section IV.5.A of this
document) must be on file with FDA’s
Grants Management Office before an
award is made. Any institution
receiving Federal funds must have an
institutional review board (IRB) of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
record even if that institution is
overseeing research conducted at other
performance sites. To avoid funding
studies that may not receive, or may
experience a delay in receiving, IRB
approval, documentation of IRB
approval and Federal Wide Assurance
(FWA or assurance) for the IRB of record
and all performance sites must be on file
with FDA’s Grants Management Office
before an award to fund the study will
be made. In addition, if a grant is
awarded, grantees will be informed of
any additional documentation that
should be submitted to FDA’s IRB. This
grant program does not require the
applicant to match or share in the
project costs if an award is made.
5. Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS)
As of October 1, 2003, applicants are
now required to have a DUNS number
to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the Federal
Government. The DUNS number is a 9digit identification number that
uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and
there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS
number, call Dun and Bradstreet at 1–
866–705–5711. Be certain that you
identify yourself as a Federal grant
applicant when you contact Dun and
Bradstreet.
6. Central Contractor Registration
In anticipation of the grants.gov
electronic application process,
applicants are encouraged to register
with the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR) database. This database is a
governmentwide repository of
commercial and financial information
for all organizations conducting
business with the Federal Government.
Registration with CCR will eventually
become a requirement for grant
applicants and is consistent with the
governmentwide Management Reform to
create a citizen-centered web presence
and build e-gov infrastructures in and
across agencies to establish a ‘‘single
face to industry.’’ The preferred method
for completing registration is on the
Internet at https://www.ccr.gov (FDA has
verified the Web site address, but we are
not responsible for subsequent changes
to the Web site or its address after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register). This Web site provides a CCR
handbook with detailed information on
data applicants will need prior to
beginning the online registration, as
well as steps to walk applicants through
the registration process. Applicants
must have a DUNS number to begin
registration and should call Dun and
Bradstreet, Inc., at the number listed in
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75199
the previous paragraph if they do not
have one.
In order to access grants.gov,
applicants will be required to register
with the Credential Provider.
Information about this is available at
https://www.grants.gov/
CredentialProvider (FDA has verified
the Web site address, but we are not
responsible for subsequent changes to
the Web site or its address after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register).
7. Clinical Trials Data Bank (CTDB)
The Food and Drug Modernization
Act of 1997 requires that certain
information be entered into CTDB for
federally and privately funded clinical
trials conducted under an IND if a drug
is being used to treat a serious or lifethreatening disease or condition and if
the trial is to test effectiveness (42
U.S.C. 282(j)(3)(A)). Information on
noneffectiveness trials for drugs to treat
conditions not considered serious or
life-threatening may also be entered into
this database, but such information is
not required.
This databank provides patients,
family members, healthcare providers,
researchers, and members of the public
easy access to information on clinical
trials for a wide range of diseases and
conditions. The U.S. National Library of
Medicine has developed this site in
collaboration with NIH and FDA. The
databank is available to the public
through the Internet at https://
clinicaltrials.gov (FDA has verified the
Web site and its address, but we are not
responsible for subsequent changes to
the Web site or its address after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register).
CTDB contains the following
information: (1) Information about
clinical trials, both federally and
privately funded, of experimental
treatments for patients with serious or
life-threatening diseases; (2) a
description of the purpose of each
experimental drug; (3) the patient
eligibility criteria; (4) the location of
clinical trial sites; and (5) the point of
contact for those wanting to enroll in
the trial. OPD program staff will provide
more information to grantees about
entering the required information in
CTDB after awards are made.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
The grants are available to any foreign
or domestic, public or private, for-profit
or nonprofit entity (including State and
local units of government). Federal
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75200
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
agencies that are not part of the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) may apply. Agencies
that are part of HHS may not apply. Forprofit entities must commit to excluding
fees or profit in their request for support
to receive grant awards. Organizations
that engage in lobbying activities, as
described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1968, are not
eligible to receive grant awards. An
application that has received two prior
disapprovals is not eligible to apply.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing is not required.
IV. Application and Submission
1. Addresses to Request Application
If submitted as a paper copy,
application requests and completed
applications should be submitted to
Cynthia Polit, Grants Management
Specialist, Division of Contracts and
Grants Management (HFA–500), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
7180, e-mail: cynthia.polit@fda.hhs.gov
or cpolit@oc.fda.gov. Applications that
are hand-carried or commercially
delivered should be addressed to 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 2105, Rockville, MD
20852. Applications may also be
obtained from OPD on the Internet at
https://www.fda.gov/orphan. Do not send
applications to the Center for Scientific
Research (CSR), NIH.
2. Content and Form of Application
A. General Information
FDA is accepting new applications for
this program electronically via
www.grants.gov. Applicants are
encouraged to apply electronically by
visiting the Web site www.grants.gov
and following instructions under
‘‘Apply for Grants.’’ The required
application, SF 424RR (Research and
Related Portable Document Formats)
can be completed and submitted online.
The package should be labeled
‘‘Response to RFA–FDA–OPD–2007’’ or
‘‘Response to RFA–FDA–OPD–2008’’. If
you experience technical difficulties
with your online submission you should
contact either the grants.gov Customer
Response Center or Cynthia Polit (see
Addresses to Request Application in
section IV.1 of this document).
To comply with the President’s
Management Agenda, HHS is
participating as a partner in the new
governmentwide grants.gov Web site.
Users of grants.gov will be able to
download a copy of the application
package, complete it offline, and then
upload and submit the application via
the grants.gov Web site. We encourage
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
your participation in the grants.gov
project. When you enter the grants.gov
Web site, you will find information
about submitting an application
electronically through the Web site.
In order to apply electronically, the
applicant must have a DUNS number
and register in the CCR database as
described in sections II.5 and II.6 of this
document.
If submitted other than electronically,
please call Cynthia Polit for guidance
(see Addresses to Request application in
section IV.1 of this document) prior to
submission. For hard copies, an original
and two copies of the completed Grant
Application Form PHS 398 (Rev. 5/01)
with three copies of the appendices
must be submitted to Cynthia Polit (see
Addresses to Request Application in
section IV.1 of this document). Other
than evidence of final IRB approval,
FWA or assurance, and certification of
adequate supply of study product, no
material will be accepted for inclusion
in the grant application after the receipt
date.
In unusual circumstances, additional
information may be considered, on a
case by case basis, for inclusion in the
ad hoc expert panel review. However,
FDA cannot assure inclusion of any
information after the receipt date other
than evidence of final IRB approval,
FWA or assurance, and certification of
adequate supply of study product.
The mailing package and the
application face page must be labeled
‘‘Response to RFA–FDA–OPD–2007’’ for
FY 2007 and ‘‘Response to RFA–FDA–
OPD–2008’’ for FY 2008. If an
application for the same study was
submitted in response to a previous
request for application (RFA) but has
not yet been funded, an application in
response to this notice will be
considered a request to withdraw the
previous application. The applicant for
a resubmitted application should
address the issues presented in the
summary statement from the previous
review and include a copy of the
summary statement itself as part of the
resubmitted application.
An application that has received two
prior disapprovals is not eligible for
resubmission.
B. Format for Application
For FY 2007, if submitted
electronically, the application must be
on SF424 Research and Related Portable
Document Format. If submitted in paper
copy, the application must be submitted
on Grant Application Form PHS 398
(Rev. 5/01). All ‘‘General Instructions’’
and ‘‘Specific Instructions’’ in the
application kit or on OPD’s Web site
(see Addresses to Request Application
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in section IV.1 of this document) must
be followed except for the receipt dates
and the mailing label address in the
PHS 398 package. The face page of the
application, either electronic or paper,
should reflect RFA number RFA–FDA–
OPD–2007. The title of the proposed
study must include the name of the
product and the disease/disorder to be
studied and the IND/IDE number. The
narrative portion of the application may
not exceed 100 pages in length and must
be single-spaced, printed on 1 side, in
12-point font, and unbound. The
appendices should also not exceed 100
pages in length (separate from the
narrative portion of the application).
For FY 2008, all applications must be
submitted electronically through
grants.gov. Exceptions may be made in
unusual circumstances and on a caseby-case basis. If electronic submission is
impossible, please contact the Grants
Management Office (see Addresses to
Request Application in section IV.1 of
this document). The face page of the
application should reflect RFA number
RFA–FDA–OPD–2008. The title of the
proposed study must include the name
of the product and the disease/disorder
to be studied and the IND/IDE number.
The narrative portion of the application
may not exceed 100 pages in length and
must be single-spaced, printed on 1
side, in 12-point font. The appendices
should also not exceed 100 pages in
length (separate from the narrative
portion of the application).
For all applications in FY 2007 and
FY 2008, applicants have the option of
omitting, from the application copies
(but not from the original), specific
salary rates or amounts for individuals
specified in the application budget and
Social Security numbers if otherwise
required for individuals. The copies
may include summary salary
information.
Applicants should provide as an
appendix to the application a summary
of any meetings or discussions about the
clinical study that have occurred with
FDA review division staff.
Data and information included in the
application generally will not be
publicly available prior to the funding
of the application. After funding has
been granted, data and information
included in the application will be
given confidential treatment to the
extent permitted by the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and
FDA’s implementing regulations
(including 21 CFR 20.61, 20.105, and
20.106). By accepting funding, the
applicant agrees to allow OPD to
publish specific information about the
grant.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
Information collection requirements
requested on Form PHS 398 (Rev. 5/01)
have been sent by PHS to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
have been approved and assigned OMB
control number 0925–0001. The
requirements requested on Form SF424
Research and Related Portable
Document Formats were approved and
assigned OMB control number 4040–
0001.
3. Submission Dates and Times
For FY 2007, the application receipt
date is March 14, 2006, and for FY 2008,
the application receipt date is February
7, 2007. Please note that there is only
one receipt date for FY 2007 and one
receipt date for FY 2008. Applications
submitted electronically must be
received by the close of business on the
established receipt date.
The protocol in the grant application
should be submitted to IND/IDE no later
than February 13, 2006, for FY 2007 and
no later than January 8, 2007, for FY
2008.
For FY 2007, if submitted as a paper
copy, applications will be accepted from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, until the established receipt
date. Applications will be considered
received on time if hand-carried to the
address noted previously (see Addresses
to Request Application in section IV.1 of
this document) before the established
receipt date, or sent or mailed by the
receipt date as shown by a legible U.S.
Postal Service dated postmark or a
legible dated receipt from a commercial
carrier (applicants should note that the
U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly
provide dated postmarks. Before relying
on this method, applicants should check
with their local post office). Private
metered postmarks shall not be
acceptable as proof of timely mailing. If
submitted electronically, applications
must be received by close of business on
the published receipt date.
Applications not received on time
will not be considered for review and
will be returned to the applicant. Please
do not send applications to CSR at NIH.
Any application sent to NIH/CSR that is
forwarded to FDA’s Grants Management
Office and not received in time for
orderly processing will be judged
nonresponsive and returned to the
applicant. Applications must be
submitted via U.S. mail or commercial
carrier or hand-carried as stated
previously, unless submitted
electronically.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
4. Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to review
under the terms of Executive Order
12372.
5. Funding Restrictions
A. Protection of Human Research
Subjects
All institutions engaged in human
subject research financially supported
by HHS must file an assurance of
protection for human subjects with
OHRP (45 CFR part 46). Applicants are
advised to visit OHRP’s Web site at
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp for guidance
on human subjects issues (FDA has
verified the Web site address, but we are
not responsible for subsequent changes
to the Web site or its address after this
document publishes in the Federal
Register).
The requirement to file an assurance
applies to both ‘‘awardee’’ and
collaborating ‘‘performance site’’
institutions. Awardee institutions are
automatically considered to be
‘‘engaged’’ in human subject research
whenever they receive a direct HHS
award to support such research, even
where all activities involving human
subjects are carried out by a
subcontractor or collaborator. In such
cases, the awardee institution bears the
responsibility for protecting human
subjects under the award.
The awardee institution is also
responsible for, among other things,
ensuring that all collaborating
performance site institutions engaged in
the research hold an approved
assurance prior to their initiation of the
research. No awardee or performance
site institution may spend funds on
human subject research or enroll
subjects without the approved and
applicable assurance(s) on file with
OHRP. An awardee institution must,
therefore, have its own IRB of record
and assurance. The IRB of record may
be an IRB already being used by one of
the ‘‘performance sites,’’ but it must
specifically be registered as the IRB of
record with OHRP.
For further information, applicants
should review the section on human
subjects in the application instructions
entitled ‘‘I. Preparing Your Application,
Section C. Specific Instructions, Item 4,
Human Subjects’’ in the PHS 398
package or as posted on the grants.gov
application Web site.
The clinical protocol should comply
with ICHE6 ‘‘Good Clinical Practice
Consolidated Guidance’’ which sets an
international ethical and scientific
quality standard for designing,
conducting, recording, and reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75201
trials that involve the participation of
human subjects. Applicants are
encouraged to review the regulations,
guidances, and information sheets on
Good Clinical Practice cited on the
Internet at https://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/.
B. Key Personnel Human Subject
Protection Education
The awardee institution is responsible
for ensuring that all key personnel
receive appropriate training in their
human subject protection
responsibilities. Key personnel include
all principal investigators,
coinvestigators, and performance site
investigators responsible for the design
and conduct of the study. HHS, FDA,
and OPD do not prescribe or endorse
any specific education programs. Many
institutions have already developed
educational programs on the protection
of research subjects and have made
participation in such programs a
requirement for their investigators.
Other sources of appropriate instruction
might include the online tutorials
offered by the Office of Human Subjects
Research, NIH, at https://ohsr.od.nih.gov
and by OHRP at https://ohrped.od.nih.gov/CBTs/Assurance/
login.asp (FDA has verified the Web site
addresses, but we are not responsible for
subsequent changes to the Web sites or
their addresses after this document
publishes in the Federal Register).
Within 30 days of the award, the
principal investigator should provide a
letter to FDA’s Grants Management
Office that includes the names of the
key personnel, the title of the human
subjects protection education program
completed by each named personnel,
and a one-sentence description of the
program. This letter should be signed by
the principal investigator and cosigned
by an institution official and sent to
FDA’s Grants Management Office.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Informed Consent
Consent forms, assent forms, and any
other information given to a subject are
part of the grant application and must
be provided, even if in a draft form. The
applicant is referred to HHS regulations
at 45 CFR 46.116 and 21 CFR 50.25 for
details regarding the required elements
of informed consent.
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
A. General Information
FDA grants management and program
staff will review all applications sent in
response to this notice. To be
responsive, an application must be
submitted in accordance with the
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75202
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
requirements of this notice and must
bear the original signatures of both the
principal investigator and the applicant
institution’s/organization’s authorized
official if submitted as a paper copy in
FY 2007. The original signature
requirement does not apply to
applications submitted electronically.
Applications found to be
nonresponsive will be returned to the
applicant without further consideration.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
contact FDA to resolve any questions
about criteria before submitting
applications. Please direct all questions
of a technical or scientific nature to OPD
program staff and all questions of an
administrative or financial nature to the
grants management staff (see Agency
Contacts in section VII of this
document).
B. Program Review Criteria
(1) Applications must propose clinical
trials intended to provide safety and/or
efficacy data.
(2) There must be an explanation in
the ‘‘Background and Significance’’
section of how the proposed study will
either contribute to product approval or
provide essential data needed for
product development.
(3) The ‘‘Background and
Significance’’ section of the application
must contain information documenting
that the prevalence, not incidence, of
the population to be served by the
product is fewer than 200,000
individuals in the United States. The
applicant should include a detailed
explanation supplemented by
authoritative references in support of
the prevalence figure. Diagnostic tests
and vaccines will qualify only if the
population of intended use is fewer than
200,000 individuals in the United States
per year.
(4) The study protocol proposed in
the grant application must be under an
active IND or IDE (not on clinical hold)
to qualify the application for scientific
and technical review. Additional IND/
IDE information is described as follows:
The proposed clinical protocol should
be submitted to FDA’s IND/IDE review
division a minimum of 30 days before
the grant application deadline.
The number assigned to the IND/IDE
that includes the proposed study should
appear on the face page of the
application with the title of the project.
The date the subject protocol was
submitted to FDA for the IND/IDE
review should also be provided.
Protocols that would otherwise be
eligible for an exemption from IND
regulations must be conducted under an
active IND to be eligible for funding
under this FDA grant program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
If the sponsor of the IND/IDE is other
than the principal investigator listed on
the application, a letter from the
sponsor permitting access to the IND/
IDE must be submitted in both the IND/
IDE and in the grant application. The
principal investigator(s) named in the
application and in the study protocol
must be submitted to the IND/IDE.
Studies of already approved products,
evaluating new orphan indications, are
also subject to these IND/IDE
requirements.
Only medical foods that do not need
premarket approval and medical devices
that are classified as nonsignificant risk
(NSR) are exempt from these IND/IDE
requirements. Applicants studying an
NSR device should provide a letter in
the application from FDA’s Center for
Devices and Radiologic Health
indicating the device is an NSR device.
(5) The requested budget must be
within the limits, either $200,000 in
total costs per year for up to 3 years for
any phase study, or $350,000 in total
costs per year for up to 3 years for phase
2 or 3 studies. Any application received
that requests support over the maximum
amount allowable for that particular
study will be considered nonresponsive.
(6) Evidence that the product to be
studied is available to the applicant in
the form and quantity needed for the
clinical trial must be included in the
application. A current letter from the
supplier as an appendix will be
acceptable. If negotiations with a
sponsor to supply the study product are
underway but have not been finalized at
the time of application, please provide
a letter indicating such in the
application. Verification of an adequate
supply of the study product will be
necessary before an award is made.
(7) The protocol should be submitted
in the application. The narrative portion
of the application should be no more
than 100 pages, single-spaced, printed
on 1 side, with 1/2-inch margins, and in
unreduced 12-point font. The
appendices should also be no more than
100 pages (separate from the narrative
portion of the application). The
application should not be bound.
C. Scientific/Technical Review Criteria
The ad hoc expert panel will review
the application based on the following
scientific and technical merit criteria:
(1) The soundness of the rationale for
the proposed study;
(2) The quality and appropriateness of
the study design, including the design
of the monitoring plans;
(3) The statistical justification for the
number of patients chosen for the study,
based on the proposed outcome
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
measures and the appropriateness of the
statistical procedures for analysis of the
results;
(4) The adequacy of the evidence that
the proposed number of eligible subjects
can be recruited in the requested
timeframe;
(5) The qualifications of the
investigator and support staff, and the
resources available to them;
(6) The adequacy of the justification
for the request for financial support;
(7) The adequacy of plans for
complying with regulations for
protection of human subjects and
monitoring; and
(8) The ability of the applicant to
complete the proposed study within its
budget and within time limits stated in
this RFA.
2. Review and Selection Process
Responsive applications will be
reviewed and evaluated for scientific
and technical merit by an ad hoc panel
of experts in the subject field of the
specific application. Consultation with
the proper FDA review division may
also occur during this phase of the
review to determine whether the
proposed study will provide acceptable
data that could contribute to product
approval. Responsive applications will
be subject to a second review by a
National Advisory Council for
concurrence with the recommendations
made by the first-level reviewers, and
funding decisions will be made by the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs or his
designee.
A score will be assigned based on the
scientific/technical review criteria. The
review panel may advise the program
staff about the appropriateness of the
proposal to the goals of OPD’s grant
program.
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award
Notification regarding the results of
the review is anticipated by September
30, 2006, for FY 2007 and by September
30, 2007, for FY 2008. The earliest
expected start date for the FY 2007
awards will be November 1, 2006, and
for FY 2008 awards, the earliest
expected start date will be November 1,
2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
If receiving an award, applicants will
be notified by FDA’s Grants
Management Office. Awards will either
be issued on a Notice of Grant Award
(PHS 5152) signed by FDA’s Chief
Grants Management Officer and be sent
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75203
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Notices
to successful applicants by mail or will
be transmitted electronically.
2. Administrative Requirements
Applicants must adhere to the
requirements of this notice. Special
terms and conditions regarding FDA
regulatory requirements and adequate
progress of the study may be part of the
award notice.
3. Reporting
A. Reporting Requirements
The original and two copies of the
annual Financial Status Report (FSR)
(SF–269) must be sent to FDA’s grants
management officer within 90 days of
the budget period end date of the grant.
For continuing grants, an annual
program progress report is also required.
For such grants, the noncompeting
continuation application (PHS 2590)
will be considered the annual program
progress report. Also, all new and
continuing grants must comply with all
regulatory requirements necessary to
keep the status of their IND/IDE
‘‘active’’ and ‘‘in effect,’’ that is, not on
‘‘clinical hold.’’ Failure to meet
regulatory requirements will be grounds
for suspension or termination of the
grant.
B. Monitoring Activities
The program project officer will
monitor grantees periodically. The
monitoring may be in the form of
telephone conversations, e-mails, or
written correspondence between the
project officer/grants management
officer and the principal investigator.
Information including but not limited to
study progress, enrollment, problems,
adverse events, changes in protocol, and
study monitoring activities will be
requested. Periodic site visits with
officials of the grantee organization also
may occur. The results of these
monitoring activities will be recorded in
the official grant file and will be
available to the grantee upon request
consistent with applicable disclosure
statutes and with FDA disclosure
regulations. Also, the grantee
organization must comply with all
special terms and conditions of the
grant, including those which state that
future funding of the study will depend
on recommendations from the OPD
project officer. The scope of the
recommendations will confirm that: (1)
There has been acceptable progress
toward enrollment, based on specific
circumstances of the study, (2) there is
an adequate supply of the product/
device, and (3) there is continued
compliance with all FDA regulatory
requirements for the trial. The grantee
must file a final program progress
report, FSR, and invention statement
within 90 days after the end date of the
project period as noted on the notice of
grant award.
VII. Agency Contacts
For issues regarding the
administrative and financial
management aspects of this notice:
Cynthia Polit (see Addresses to
Request Application in section IV.1
of this document).
For issues regarding the
programmatic aspects of this notice:
Debra Y. Lewis, Director, Orphan
Products Grants Program, Office of
Orphan Products Development
(HF–35), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
rm. 6A–55, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–827–3666, e-mail:
debra.lewis@fda.gov or
dlewis@oc.fda.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Data included in the application may
be entitled to confidential treatment as
trade secret or confidential commercial
information within the meaning of the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4)) and FDA’s implementing
regulations (21 CFR 20.61).
Unless disclosure is required under
the Freedom of Information Act as
amended (5 U.S.C. 552) as determined
by the freedom of information officials
of HHS, by a court, or required by
another Federal law, data contained in
the portions of this application that
have been specifically identified by
page number, paragraph, etc., by the
applicant as containing restricted
information, shall not be used or
disclosed except for evaluation
purposes.
Dated: December 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–24164 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Number of respondents
Type of respondent
Sites .....................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Responses
per respondents
43
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA)
publishes abstracts of information
collection requests under review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of
the clearance requests submitted to
OMB for review, call the HRSA Reports
Clearance Office on (301)–443–1129.
The following request has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
Proposed Project: The Sentinel Centers
Network (SCN) Core Data Set (OMB No.
0915–0268)—Extension
HRSA’s Bureau of Primary Health
Care (BPHC) established the Sentinel
Centers Network (SCN) to assist in
addressing critical quality,
programmatic, and policy issues. Health
centers identified as having adequate
infrastructure and commitment through
the competitive contract process have
generated data for quality and program
analyses and for projects on topics that
have immediate programmatic impact.
Health centers submit core data
periodically extracted from existing
information systems. These core data
comprise patient, encounter, and
practitioner level information including
patient demographics, insurance status,
clinical diagnoses and procedures,
outcomes, and practitioner
characteristics. Since all data obtained
from the participant health centers are
extracted/compiled from existing
information systems and not through
primary data collection, burden is
minimized. In addition, each participant
site receives technical assistance as
needed to reduce burden and facilitate
data submission.
The annual burden estimate for this
activity is as follows:
Total responses
2
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
Hours per response
86
19DEN1
8
Total burden
hours
688
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75198-75203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24164]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Clinical Studies of Safety and Effectiveness of Orphan Products;
Availability of Grants; Request for Applications
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing changes to its
Office of Orphan Products Development (OPD) grant program for fiscal
year (FY) 2007 and FY 2008. This announcement supersedes the previous
announcement of this program, which was published in the Federal
Register of January 14, 2005 (70 FR 2642). Please note that there is
only one receipt date for FY 2007 and one receipt date for FY 2008.
1. Background
OPD was created to identify and promote the development of orphan
products. Orphan products are drugs, biologics, medical devices, and
foods for medical purposes that are indicated for a rare disease or
condition (that is, one with a prevalence, not incidence, of fewer than
200,000 people in the United States). Diagnostic tests and vaccines
will qualify only if the U.S. population of intended use is fewer than
200,000 people per year.
2. Program Research Goals
The goal of FDA's OPD grant program is to support the clinical
development of products for use in rare diseases or conditions where no
current therapy exists or where the product will improve the existing
therapy. FDA provides grants for clinical studies on safety and/or
effectiveness that will either result in, or substantially contribute
to, market approval of these products. Applicants must include, in the
application's ``Background and Significance'' section, documentation to
support the estimated prevalence of the orphan disease or condition and
an explanation of how the proposed study will either help gain product
approval or provide essential data needed for product development. All
funded studies are subject to the requirements of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) and
regulations issued under it.
II. Award Information
Except for applications for studies of medical foods that do not
need premarket approval, FDA will only award grants to support
premarket clinical studies to determine safety and effectiveness for
approval under section 505 or 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 355, or 360e)
or safety, purity, and potency for licensing under section 351 of the
Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act) (42 U.S.C. 262).
FDA will support the clinical studies covered by this notice under
the authority of section 301 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 241). FDA's
research program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance, No. 93.103.
Applicants for Public Health Service (PHS) clinical research grants
are encouraged to include minorities and women in study populations so
research findings can be of benefit to all people at risk of the
disease or condition under study. It is recommended that applicants
place special emphasis on including minorities and women in studies of
diseases, disorders, and conditions that disproportionately affect
them. This policy applies to research subjects of all ages. If women or
minorities are excluded or poorly represented in clinical research, the
applicant should provide a clear and compelling rationale that shows
inclusion is inappropriate.
PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
free workplace and to discourage the use of all tobacco products. This
is consistent with PHS' mission to protect and advance the physical and
mental health of the American people.
FDA is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease
prevention objectives of ``Healthy People 2010,'' a national effort
designed to reduce morbidity and mortality and to improve quality of
life. Applicants may obtain a paper copy of the ``Healthy People 2010''
objectives, vols. I and II, for $70 ($87.50 foreign) S/N 017-000-00550-
9, by writing to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954,
Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Telephone orders can be placed to 202-512-
2250. The document is also available in CD-ROM format, S/N 017-001-
00549-5 for $19 ($23.50 foreign) as well as on the Internet at https://
www.healthypeople.gov/. Internet viewers should proceed to
``Publications'' (FDA has verified the Web site and its address, but we
are not responsible for subsequent changes to the Web site or its
address after this document publishes in the Federal Register).
1. Award Instrument
Support will be in the form of a grant. All awards will be subject
to all policies and requirements that govern the research grant
programs of PHS, including the provisions of 42 CFR part 52 and 45 CFR
parts 74 and 92. The regulations issued under Executive Order 12372 do
not apply to this program. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)
modular grant program does not apply to this FDA grant program. All
grant awards are subject to applicable requirements for clinical
investigations imposed by sections 505, 512, and 515 of the act,
section 351 of the PHS Act, and regulations issued under any of these
sections.
2. Award Amount
Of the estimated FY 2007 funding ($14.2 million), approximately $10
million will fund noncompeting continuation awards, and approximately
$4.2 million will fund 10 to 12 new awards subject to availability of
funds. It is anticipated that funding for the number of noncompeting
continuation awards and new awards in FY 2008 will
[[Page 75199]]
be similar to FY 2007. The earliest expected start date for the FY 2007
and FY 2008 awards will be November 1, 2006, and November 1, 2007,
respectively. Grants will be awarded up to $200,000 or up to $350,000
in total (direct plus indirect) costs per year for up to 3 years.
Please note that the dollar limitation will be total costs, not direct
costs as in previous years.
Applications for the smaller grants ($200,000) may be for phase 1,
2, or 3 studies. Study proposals for the larger grants ($350,000) must
be for studies continuing in phase 2 or 3 of investigation. Phase 1
studies include the initial introduction of an investigational new drug
or device into humans, are usually conducted in healthy volunteer
subjects, and are designed to determine the metabolic and
pharmacological actions of the product in humans, the side effects
including those associated with increasing drug doses and, if possible,
to gain early evidence on effectiveness. Phase 2 studies include early
controlled clinical studies conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of
the product for a particular indication in patients with the disease or
condition and to determine the common short-term side effects and risks
associated with it. Phase 3 studies gather more information about
effectiveness and safety that is necessary to evaluate the overall
risk-benefit ratio of the product and to provide an acceptable basis
for product labeling. Budgets for each year of requested support may
not exceed the $200,000 or $350,000 total cost limit, whichever is
applicable.
3. Length of Support
The length of support will depend on the nature of the study. For
those studies with an expected duration of more than 1 year, a second
or third year of noncompetitive continuation of support will depend on
the following factors: (1) Performance during the preceding year, (2)
compliance with regulatory requirements of the investigational new drug
(IND)/investigational device exemption (IDE), and (3) availability of
Federal funds.
4. Funding Plan
In addition to the requirement for an active IND/IDE discussed in
section V.1.B.(4) of this document, documentation of assurances with
the Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP) (see section IV.5.A of
this document) must be on file with FDA's Grants Management Office
before an award is made. Any institution receiving Federal funds must
have an institutional review board (IRB) of record even if that
institution is overseeing research conducted at other performance
sites. To avoid funding studies that may not receive, or may experience
a delay in receiving, IRB approval, documentation of IRB approval and
Federal Wide Assurance (FWA or assurance) for the IRB of record and all
performance sites must be on file with FDA's Grants Management Office
before an award to fund the study will be made. In addition, if a grant
is awarded, grantees will be informed of any additional documentation
that should be submitted to FDA's IRB. This grant program does not
require the applicant to match or share in the project costs if an
award is made.
5. Dun and Bradstreet Number (DUNS)
As of October 1, 2003, applicants are now required to have a DUNS
number to apply for a grant or cooperative agreement from the Federal
Government. The DUNS number is a 9-digit identification number that
uniquely identifies business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy
and there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, call Dun and
Bradstreet at 1-866-705-5711. Be certain that you identify yourself as
a Federal grant applicant when you contact Dun and Bradstreet.
6. Central Contractor Registration
In anticipation of the grants.gov electronic application process,
applicants are encouraged to register with the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) database. This database is a governmentwide
repository of commercial and financial information for all
organizations conducting business with the Federal Government.
Registration with CCR will eventually become a requirement for grant
applicants and is consistent with the governmentwide Management Reform
to create a citizen-centered web presence and build e-gov
infrastructures in and across agencies to establish a ``single face to
industry.'' The preferred method for completing registration is on the
Internet at https://www.ccr.gov (FDA has verified the Web site address,
but we are not responsible for subsequent changes to the Web site or
its address after this document publishes in the Federal Register).
This Web site provides a CCR handbook with detailed information on data
applicants will need prior to beginning the online registration, as
well as steps to walk applicants through the registration process.
Applicants must have a DUNS number to begin registration and should
call Dun and Bradstreet, Inc., at the number listed in the previous
paragraph if they do not have one.
In order to access grants.gov, applicants will be required to
register with the Credential Provider. Information about this is
available at https://www.grants.gov/CredentialProvider (FDA has verified
the Web site address, but we are not responsible for subsequent changes
to the Web site or its address after this document publishes in the
Federal Register).
7. Clinical Trials Data Bank (CTDB)
The Food and Drug Modernization Act of 1997 requires that certain
information be entered into CTDB for federally and privately funded
clinical trials conducted under an IND if a drug is being used to treat
a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and if the trial is
to test effectiveness (42 U.S.C. 282(j)(3)(A)). Information on
noneffectiveness trials for drugs to treat conditions not considered
serious or life-threatening may also be entered into this database, but
such information is not required.
This databank provides patients, family members, healthcare
providers, researchers, and members of the public easy access to
information on clinical trials for a wide range of diseases and
conditions. The U.S. National Library of Medicine has developed this
site in collaboration with NIH and FDA. The databank is available to
the public through the Internet at https://clinicaltrials.gov (FDA has
verified the Web site and its address, but we are not responsible for
subsequent changes to the Web site or its address after this document
publishes in the Federal Register).
CTDB contains the following information: (1) Information about
clinical trials, both federally and privately funded, of experimental
treatments for patients with serious or life-threatening diseases; (2)
a description of the purpose of each experimental drug; (3) the patient
eligibility criteria; (4) the location of clinical trial sites; and (5)
the point of contact for those wanting to enroll in the trial. OPD
program staff will provide more information to grantees about entering
the required information in CTDB after awards are made.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
The grants are available to any foreign or domestic, public or
private, for-profit or nonprofit entity (including State and local
units of government). Federal
[[Page 75200]]
agencies that are not part of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) may apply. Agencies that are part of HHS may not apply.
For-profit entities must commit to excluding fees or profit in their
request for support to receive grant awards. Organizations that engage
in lobbying activities, as described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1968, are not eligible to receive grant
awards. An application that has received two prior disapprovals is not
eligible to apply.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing is not required.
IV. Application and Submission
1. Addresses to Request Application
If submitted as a paper copy, application requests and completed
applications should be submitted to Cynthia Polit, Grants Management
Specialist, Division of Contracts and Grants Management (HFA-500), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-
827-7180, e-mail: cynthia.polit@fda.hhs.gov or cpolit@oc.fda.gov.
Applications that are hand-carried or commercially delivered should be
addressed to 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 2105, Rockville, MD 20852.
Applications may also be obtained from OPD on the Internet at https://
www.fda.gov/orphan. Do not send applications to the Center for
Scientific Research (CSR), NIH.
2. Content and Form of Application
A. General Information
FDA is accepting new applications for this program electronically
via www.grants.gov. Applicants are encouraged to apply electronically
by visiting the Web site www.grants.gov and following instructions
under ``Apply for Grants.'' The required application, SF 424RR
(Research and Related Portable Document Formats) can be completed and
submitted online. The package should be labeled ``Response to RFA-FDA-
OPD-2007'' or ``Response to RFA-FDA-OPD-2008''. If you experience
technical difficulties with your online submission you should contact
either the grants.gov Customer Response Center or Cynthia Polit (see
Addresses to Request Application in section IV.1 of this document).
To comply with the President's Management Agenda, HHS is
participating as a partner in the new governmentwide grants.gov Web
site. Users of grants.gov will be able to download a copy of the
application package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit
the application via the grants.gov Web site. We encourage your
participation in the grants.gov project. When you enter the grants.gov
Web site, you will find information about submitting an application
electronically through the Web site.
In order to apply electronically, the applicant must have a DUNS
number and register in the CCR database as described in sections II.5
and II.6 of this document.
If submitted other than electronically, please call Cynthia Polit
for guidance (see Addresses to Request application in section IV.1 of
this document) prior to submission. For hard copies, an original and
two copies of the completed Grant Application Form PHS 398 (Rev. 5/01)
with three copies of the appendices must be submitted to Cynthia Polit
(see Addresses to Request Application in section IV.1 of this
document). Other than evidence of final IRB approval, FWA or assurance,
and certification of adequate supply of study product, no material will
be accepted for inclusion in the grant application after the receipt
date.
In unusual circumstances, additional information may be considered,
on a case by case basis, for inclusion in the ad hoc expert panel
review. However, FDA cannot assure inclusion of any information after
the receipt date other than evidence of final IRB approval, FWA or
assurance, and certification of adequate supply of study product.
The mailing package and the application face page must be labeled
``Response to RFA-FDA-OPD-2007'' for FY 2007 and ``Response to RFA-FDA-
OPD-2008'' for FY 2008. If an application for the same study was
submitted in response to a previous request for application (RFA) but
has not yet been funded, an application in response to this notice will
be considered a request to withdraw the previous application. The
applicant for a resubmitted application should address the issues
presented in the summary statement from the previous review and include
a copy of the summary statement itself as part of the resubmitted
application.
An application that has received two prior disapprovals is not
eligible for resubmission.
B. Format for Application
For FY 2007, if submitted electronically, the application must be
on SF424 Research and Related Portable Document Format. If submitted in
paper copy, the application must be submitted on Grant Application Form
PHS 398 (Rev. 5/01). All ``General Instructions'' and ``Specific
Instructions'' in the application kit or on OPD's Web site (see
Addresses to Request Application in section IV.1 of this document) must
be followed except for the receipt dates and the mailing label address
in the PHS 398 package. The face page of the application, either
electronic or paper, should reflect RFA number RFA-FDA-OPD-2007. The
title of the proposed study must include the name of the product and
the disease/disorder to be studied and the IND/IDE number. The
narrative portion of the application may not exceed 100 pages in length
and must be single-spaced, printed on 1 side, in 12-point font, and
unbound. The appendices should also not exceed 100 pages in length
(separate from the narrative portion of the application).
For FY 2008, all applications must be submitted electronically
through grants.gov. Exceptions may be made in unusual circumstances and
on a case-by-case basis. If electronic submission is impossible, please
contact the Grants Management Office (see Addresses to Request
Application in section IV.1 of this document). The face page of the
application should reflect RFA number RFA-FDA-OPD-2008. The title of
the proposed study must include the name of the product and the
disease/disorder to be studied and the IND/IDE number. The narrative
portion of the application may not exceed 100 pages in length and must
be single-spaced, printed on 1 side, in 12-point font. The appendices
should also not exceed 100 pages in length (separate from the narrative
portion of the application).
For all applications in FY 2007 and FY 2008, applicants have the
option of omitting, from the application copies (but not from the
original), specific salary rates or amounts for individuals specified
in the application budget and Social Security numbers if otherwise
required for individuals. The copies may include summary salary
information.
Applicants should provide as an appendix to the application a
summary of any meetings or discussions about the clinical study that
have occurred with FDA review division staff.
Data and information included in the application generally will not
be publicly available prior to the funding of the application. After
funding has been granted, data and information included in the
application will be given confidential treatment to the extent
permitted by the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and
FDA's implementing regulations (including 21 CFR 20.61, 20.105, and
20.106). By accepting funding, the applicant agrees to allow OPD to
publish specific information about the grant.
[[Page 75201]]
Information collection requirements requested on Form PHS 398 (Rev.
5/01) have been sent by PHS to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and have been approved and assigned OMB control number 0925-0001.
The requirements requested on Form SF424 Research and Related Portable
Document Formats were approved and assigned OMB control number 4040-
0001.
3. Submission Dates and Times
For FY 2007, the application receipt date is March 14, 2006, and
for FY 2008, the application receipt date is February 7, 2007. Please
note that there is only one receipt date for FY 2007 and one receipt
date for FY 2008. Applications submitted electronically must be
received by the close of business on the established receipt date.
The protocol in the grant application should be submitted to IND/
IDE no later than February 13, 2006, for FY 2007 and no later than
January 8, 2007, for FY 2008.
For FY 2007, if submitted as a paper copy, applications will be
accepted from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, until the
established receipt date. Applications will be considered received on
time if hand-carried to the address noted previously (see Addresses to
Request Application in section IV.1 of this document) before the
established receipt date, or sent or mailed by the receipt date as
shown by a legible U.S. Postal Service dated postmark or a legible
dated receipt from a commercial carrier (applicants should note that
the U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide dated postmarks.
Before relying on this method, applicants should check with their local
post office). Private metered postmarks shall not be acceptable as
proof of timely mailing. If submitted electronically, applications must
be received by close of business on the published receipt date.
Applications not received on time will not be considered for review
and will be returned to the applicant. Please do not send applications
to CSR at NIH. Any application sent to NIH/CSR that is forwarded to
FDA's Grants Management Office and not received in time for orderly
processing will be judged nonresponsive and returned to the applicant.
Applications must be submitted via U.S. mail or commercial carrier or
hand-carried as stated previously, unless submitted electronically.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This program is not subject to review under the terms of Executive
Order 12372.
5. Funding Restrictions
A. Protection of Human Research Subjects
All institutions engaged in human subject research financially
supported by HHS must file an assurance of protection for human
subjects with OHRP (45 CFR part 46). Applicants are advised to visit
OHRP's Web site at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp for guidance on human
subjects issues (FDA has verified the Web site address, but we are not
responsible for subsequent changes to the Web site or its address after
this document publishes in the Federal Register).
The requirement to file an assurance applies to both ``awardee''
and collaborating ``performance site'' institutions. Awardee
institutions are automatically considered to be ``engaged'' in human
subject research whenever they receive a direct HHS award to support
such research, even where all activities involving human subjects are
carried out by a subcontractor or collaborator. In such cases, the
awardee institution bears the responsibility for protecting human
subjects under the award.
The awardee institution is also responsible for, among other
things, ensuring that all collaborating performance site institutions
engaged in the research hold an approved assurance prior to their
initiation of the research. No awardee or performance site institution
may spend funds on human subject research or enroll subjects without
the approved and applicable assurance(s) on file with OHRP. An awardee
institution must, therefore, have its own IRB of record and assurance.
The IRB of record may be an IRB already being used by one of the
``performance sites,'' but it must specifically be registered as the
IRB of record with OHRP.
For further information, applicants should review the section on
human subjects in the application instructions entitled ``I. Preparing
Your Application, Section C. Specific Instructions, Item 4, Human
Subjects'' in the PHS 398 package or as posted on the grants.gov
application Web site.
The clinical protocol should comply with ICHE6 ``Good Clinical
Practice Consolidated Guidance'' which sets an international ethical
and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording,
and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects.
Applicants are encouraged to review the regulations, guidances, and
information sheets on Good Clinical Practice cited on the Internet at
https://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/.
B. Key Personnel Human Subject Protection Education
The awardee institution is responsible for ensuring that all key
personnel receive appropriate training in their human subject
protection responsibilities. Key personnel include all principal
investigators, coinvestigators, and performance site investigators
responsible for the design and conduct of the study. HHS, FDA, and OPD
do not prescribe or endorse any specific education programs. Many
institutions have already developed educational programs on the
protection of research subjects and have made participation in such
programs a requirement for their investigators. Other sources of
appropriate instruction might include the online tutorials offered by
the Office of Human Subjects Research, NIH, at https://ohsr.od.nih.gov
and by OHRP at https://ohrp-ed.od.nih.gov/CBTs/Assurance/login.asp (FDA
has verified the Web site addresses, but we are not responsible for
subsequent changes to the Web sites or their addresses after this
document publishes in the Federal Register).
Within 30 days of the award, the principal investigator should
provide a letter to FDA's Grants Management Office that includes the
names of the key personnel, the title of the human subjects protection
education program completed by each named personnel, and a one-sentence
description of the program. This letter should be signed by the
principal investigator and cosigned by an institution official and sent
to FDA's Grants Management Office.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Informed Consent
Consent forms, assent forms, and any other information given to a
subject are part of the grant application and must be provided, even if
in a draft form. The applicant is referred to HHS regulations at 45 CFR
46.116 and 21 CFR 50.25 for details regarding the required elements of
informed consent.
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria
A. General Information
FDA grants management and program staff will review all
applications sent in response to this notice. To be responsive, an
application must be submitted in accordance with the
[[Page 75202]]
requirements of this notice and must bear the original signatures of
both the principal investigator and the applicant institution's/
organization's authorized official if submitted as a paper copy in FY
2007. The original signature requirement does not apply to applications
submitted electronically.
Applications found to be nonresponsive will be returned to the
applicant without further consideration. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to contact FDA to resolve any questions about criteria
before submitting applications. Please direct all questions of a
technical or scientific nature to OPD program staff and all questions
of an administrative or financial nature to the grants management staff
(see Agency Contacts in section VII of this document).
B. Program Review Criteria
(1) Applications must propose clinical trials intended to provide
safety and/or efficacy data.
(2) There must be an explanation in the ``Background and
Significance'' section of how the proposed study will either contribute
to product approval or provide essential data needed for product
development.
(3) The ``Background and Significance'' section of the application
must contain information documenting that the prevalence, not
incidence, of the population to be served by the product is fewer than
200,000 individuals in the United States. The applicant should include
a detailed explanation supplemented by authoritative references in
support of the prevalence figure. Diagnostic tests and vaccines will
qualify only if the population of intended use is fewer than 200,000
individuals in the United States per year.
(4) The study protocol proposed in the grant application must be
under an active IND or IDE (not on clinical hold) to qualify the
application for scientific and technical review. Additional IND/IDE
information is described as follows:
The proposed clinical protocol should be submitted to FDA's IND/IDE
review division a minimum of 30 days before the grant application
deadline.
The number assigned to the IND/IDE that includes the proposed study
should appear on the face page of the application with the title of the
project. The date the subject protocol was submitted to FDA for the
IND/IDE review should also be provided.
Protocols that would otherwise be eligible for an exemption from
IND regulations must be conducted under an active IND to be eligible
for funding under this FDA grant program.
If the sponsor of the IND/IDE is other than the principal
investigator listed on the application, a letter from the sponsor
permitting access to the IND/IDE must be submitted in both the IND/IDE
and in the grant application. The principal investigator(s) named in
the application and in the study protocol must be submitted to the IND/
IDE.
Studies of already approved products, evaluating new orphan
indications, are also subject to these IND/IDE requirements.
Only medical foods that do not need premarket approval and medical
devices that are classified as nonsignificant risk (NSR) are exempt
from these IND/IDE requirements. Applicants studying an NSR device
should provide a letter in the application from FDA's Center for
Devices and Radiologic Health indicating the device is an NSR device.
(5) The requested budget must be within the limits, either $200,000
in total costs per year for up to 3 years for any phase study, or
$350,000 in total costs per year for up to 3 years for phase 2 or 3
studies. Any application received that requests support over the
maximum amount allowable for that particular study will be considered
nonresponsive.
(6) Evidence that the product to be studied is available to the
applicant in the form and quantity needed for the clinical trial must
be included in the application. A current letter from the supplier as
an appendix will be acceptable. If negotiations with a sponsor to
supply the study product are underway but have not been finalized at
the time of application, please provide a letter indicating such in the
application. Verification of an adequate supply of the study product
will be necessary before an award is made.
(7) The protocol should be submitted in the application. The
narrative portion of the application should be no more than 100 pages,
single-spaced, printed on 1 side, with 1/2-inch margins, and in
unreduced 12-point font. The appendices should also be no more than 100
pages (separate from the narrative portion of the application). The
application should not be bound.
C. Scientific/Technical Review Criteria
The ad hoc expert panel will review the application based on the
following scientific and technical merit criteria:
(1) The soundness of the rationale for the proposed study;
(2) The quality and appropriateness of the study design, including
the design of the monitoring plans;
(3) The statistical justification for the number of patients chosen
for the study, based on the proposed outcome measures and the
appropriateness of the statistical procedures for analysis of the
results;
(4) The adequacy of the evidence that the proposed number of
eligible subjects can be recruited in the requested timeframe;
(5) The qualifications of the investigator and support staff, and
the resources available to them;
(6) The adequacy of the justification for the request for financial
support;
(7) The adequacy of plans for complying with regulations for
protection of human subjects and monitoring; and
(8) The ability of the applicant to complete the proposed study
within its budget and within time limits stated in this RFA.
2. Review and Selection Process
Responsive applications will be reviewed and evaluated for
scientific and technical merit by an ad hoc panel of experts in the
subject field of the specific application. Consultation with the proper
FDA review division may also occur during this phase of the review to
determine whether the proposed study will provide acceptable data that
could contribute to product approval. Responsive applications will be
subject to a second review by a National Advisory Council for
concurrence with the recommendations made by the first-level reviewers,
and funding decisions will be made by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs or his designee.
A score will be assigned based on the scientific/technical review
criteria. The review panel may advise the program staff about the
appropriateness of the proposal to the goals of OPD's grant program.
3. Anticipated Announcement and Award
Notification regarding the results of the review is anticipated by
September 30, 2006, for FY 2007 and by September 30, 2007, for FY 2008.
The earliest expected start date for the FY 2007 awards will be
November 1, 2006, and for FY 2008 awards, the earliest expected start
date will be November 1, 2007.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
If receiving an award, applicants will be notified by FDA's Grants
Management Office. Awards will either be issued on a Notice of Grant
Award (PHS 5152) signed by FDA's Chief Grants Management Officer and be
sent
[[Page 75203]]
to successful applicants by mail or will be transmitted electronically.
2. Administrative Requirements
Applicants must adhere to the requirements of this notice. Special
terms and conditions regarding FDA regulatory requirements and adequate
progress of the study may be part of the award notice.
3. Reporting
A. Reporting Requirements
The original and two copies of the annual Financial Status Report
(FSR) (SF-269) must be sent to FDA's grants management officer within
90 days of the budget period end date of the grant. For continuing
grants, an annual program progress report is also required. For such
grants, the noncompeting continuation application (PHS 2590) will be
considered the annual program progress report. Also, all new and
continuing grants must comply with all regulatory requirements
necessary to keep the status of their IND/IDE ``active'' and ``in
effect,'' that is, not on ``clinical hold.'' Failure to meet regulatory
requirements will be grounds for suspension or termination of the
grant.
B. Monitoring Activities
The program project officer will monitor grantees periodically. The
monitoring may be in the form of telephone conversations, e-mails, or
written correspondence between the project officer/grants management
officer and the principal investigator. Information including but not
limited to study progress, enrollment, problems, adverse events,
changes in protocol, and study monitoring activities will be requested.
Periodic site visits with officials of the grantee organization also
may occur. The results of these monitoring activities will be recorded
in the official grant file and will be available to the grantee upon
request consistent with applicable disclosure statutes and with FDA
disclosure regulations. Also, the grantee organization must comply with
all special terms and conditions of the grant, including those which
state that future funding of the study will depend on recommendations
from the OPD project officer. The scope of the recommendations will
confirm that: (1) There has been acceptable progress toward enrollment,
based on specific circumstances of the study, (2) there is an adequate
supply of the product/device, and (3) there is continued compliance
with all FDA regulatory requirements for the trial. The grantee must
file a final program progress report, FSR, and invention statement
within 90 days after the end date of the project period as noted on the
notice of grant award.
VII. Agency Contacts
For issues regarding the administrative and financial management
aspects of this notice: Cynthia Polit (see Addresses to Request
Application in section IV.1 of this document).
For issues regarding the programmatic aspects of this notice: Debra
Y. Lewis, Director, Orphan Products Grants Program, Office of Orphan
Products Development (HF-35), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, rm. 6A-55, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-3666, e-mail:
debra.lewis@fda.gov or dlewis@oc.fda.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Data included in the application may be entitled to confidential
treatment as trade secret or confidential commercial information within
the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and
FDA's implementing regulations (21 CFR 20.61).
Unless disclosure is required under the Freedom of Information Act
as amended (5 U.S.C. 552) as determined by the freedom of information
officials of HHS, by a court, or required by another Federal law, data
contained in the portions of this application that have been
specifically identified by page number, paragraph, etc., by the
applicant as containing restricted information, shall not be used or
disclosed except for evaluation purposes.
Dated: December 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-24164 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S