Special Conditions; Envoy Aerospace; EFIS on the Raytheon Model B200, B200C, 300, B300, and B300C; Protection of Systems for High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF), 75000-75002 [05-24159]
Download as PDF
75000
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Sixth District are required by the
statutory and regulatory definitions of
‘‘check-processing region.’’ Because
there is no substantive change on which
to seek public input and because
delaying the amendments may impede
affected banks’ ability to comply with
Regulation CC, the Board has
determined that the § 553(b) notice and
comment procedures are unnecessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the Board certifies that the final
rule will not have a significantly
adverse economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
These amendments are technical, and
the routing number changes are required
by law. Moreover, these amendments
apply to all banks regardless of their
size. Many small banks generally
provide next-day availability for all
checks and will not be affected by this
amendment. For the subset of small
banks that does distinguish between
checks subject to next-day availability
and those subject to longer holds, the
final rule should necessitate only
minimal programming changes. Some of
these affected banks might also have to
modify their funds availability
disclosures and notify both new and
existing customers of the modified
funds availability schedules.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506;
5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1), the
Board has reviewed the final rule under
authority delegated to the Board by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
technical amendment to appendix A of
Regulation CC will delete the reference
to the New Orleans branch office of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and
reassign the routing symbols listed
under that office to the head office of
the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
The depository institutions that are
located in the affected check processing
regions and that include the routing
numbers in their disclosure statements
would be required to notify customers
of the resulting change in availability
under § 229.18(e). However, all
paperwork collection procedures
associated with Regulation CC already
are in place, and the Board accordingly
anticipates that no additional burden
will be imposed as a result of this
rulemaking. The Board is also correcting
typographical errors in the routing
symbol list under the Helena branch
office of the Federal Reserve Bank of
Minnesota. The Board anticipates that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
these corrections will not impose any
burden.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 229
Banks, Banking, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board is amending 12
CFR part 229 to read as follows:
I
PART 229—AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
AND COLLECTION OF CHECKS
(REGULATION CC)
1. The authority citation for part 229
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4001–4010, 12 U.S.C.
5001–5018.
2. The Sixth and Ninth Federal
Reserve District routing symbol lists in
appendix A are revised to read as
follows:
I
Appendix A to Part 229—Routing
Number Guide to Next-Day Availability
Checks and Local Checks
*
*
*
*
*
Sixth Federal Reserve District
[Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta]
Head Office
0610
0611
0612
0613
0620
0621
0622
0650
0651
0652
0653
0654
0655
2610
2611
2612
2613
2620
2621
2622
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
Jacksonville Branch
0630
0631
0632
0660
0670
2630
2631
2632
2660
2670
Nashville Branch
0640
0641
0642
2640
2641
2642
*
*
*
*
Head Office
0910
0911
0912
0913
0914
0915
0918
Frm 00006
2919
2960
Helena Branch
0920
0921
0929
*
*
*
2920
2921
2929
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, acting through the
Secretary of the Board under delegated
authority, December 13, 2005.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E5–7462 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE236, Special Condition 23–
176–SC]
Special Conditions; Envoy Aerospace;
EFIS on the Raytheon Model B200,
B200C, 300, B300, and B300C;
Protection of Systems for High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
*
Ninth Federal Reserve District
[Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis]
PO 00000
0919
0960
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2918
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued to Envoy Aerospace, 5027 Switch
Grass Lane, Naperville, Illinois 60564–
5368, for a Supplemental Type
Certificate for the Raytheon B200,
B200C, 300, B300, and B300C models.
These models will have novel and
unusual design features when compared
to the state of technology envisaged in
the applicable airworthiness standards.
These novel and unusual design
features include the installation of an
electronic flight instrument system
(EFIS) and a navigation display. The
EFIS consists of the Universal Avionics,
Inc. EFI–890R system for which the
applicable regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate airworthiness
standards for the protection of these
systems from the effects of high
intensity radiated fields (HIRF). The
installation includes three EFI–890R
Flat Panel Displays (two Primary Flight
Displays Pilot/Copilot and one
Navigational Display), and supporting
equipment. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to the airworthiness
standards applicable to these airplanes.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
The effective date of these
special conditions is December 5, 2005.
Comments must be received on or
before January 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk,
Docket No. CE236, Room 506, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. All
comments must be marked: Docket No.
CE236. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes
Ryan, Aerospace Engineer, Standards
Office (ACE–110), Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone
(816) 329–4127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
issuance of the design approval and
thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA, therefore, finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance.
DATES:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to
submit such written data, views, or
arguments, as they may desire.
Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or notice number and
be submitted in duplicate to the address
specified above. All communications
received on or before the closing date
for comments will be considered by the
Administrator. The special conditions
may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments
received will be available in the Rules
Docket for examination by interested
persons, both before and after the
closing date for comments. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice
must include a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. CE236.’’ The postcard will
be date stamped and returned to the
commenter.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Background
Envoy Aerospace made application to
the FAA for a new Supplemental Type
Certificate for several Raytheon King Air
Models. The Raytheon Model B200,
B200C, 300, B300, and B300C are
currently approved under TC No.
A24CE. The proposed modification
incorporates a novel or unusual design
features, such as a digital Primary Flight
Display, that may be vulnerable to HIRF
external to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part
21, § 21.101, Envoy Aerospace must
show that the modified aircraft meet the
original certification basis for the
airplane, as listed on Type Data Sheet
A24CE, additional certification
requirements added for the Universal
Avionics EFI–890R system, exemptions,
if any; and the special conditions
adopted by this rulemaking action. The
rules that were applied at Part 23
Amendment 54 for the EFI–890R
installation include §§ 23.1301, 23.1311,
23.1309, 23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and
23.1543.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness standards do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards because of novel or
unusual design features of an airplane,
special conditions are prescribed under
the provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions, as appropriate, as
defined in § 11.19, are issued in
accordance with § 11.38 after public
notice and become part of the type
certification basis in accordance with
§ 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model already
included on the same type certificate to
incorporate the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model
under the provisions of § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Envoy Aerospace plans to incorporate
certain novel and unusual design
features into the Raytheon King Air
Models for which the airworthiness
standards do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for
protection from the effects of HIRF.
These features include EFIS, which are
susceptible to the HIRF environment,
that were not envisaged by the existing
regulations for this type of airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75001
Protection of Systems From High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Recent advances in technology have
given rise to the application in aircraft
designs of advanced electrical and
electronic systems that perform
functions required for continued safe
flight and landing. Due to the use of
sensitive solid-state advanced
components in analog and digital
electronics circuits, these advanced
systems are readily responsive to the
transient effects of induced electrical
current and voltage caused by the HIRF.
The HIRF can degrade electronic
systems performance by damaging
components or upsetting system
functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment
has undergone a transformation that was
not foreseen when the current
requirements were developed. Higher
energy levels are radiated from
transmitters that are used for radar,
radio, and television. Also, the number
of transmitters has increased
significantly. There is also uncertainty
concerning the effectiveness of airframe
shielding for HIRF. Furthermore,
coupling to cockpit-installed equipment
through the cockpit window apertures is
undefined.
The combined effect of the
technological advances in airplane
design and the changing environment
has resulted in an increased level of
vulnerability of electrical and electronic
systems required for the continued safe
flight and landing of the airplane.
Effective measures against the effects of
exposure to HIRF must be provided by
the design and installation of these
systems. The accepted maximum energy
levels in which civilian airplane system
installations must be capable of
operating safely are based on surveys
and analysis of existing radio frequency
emitters. These special conditions
require that the airplane be evaluated
under these energy levels for the
protection of the electronic system and
its associated wiring harness. These
external threat levels, which are lower
than previous required values, are
believed to represent the worst case to
which an airplane would be exposed in
the operating environment.
These special conditions require
qualification of systems that perform
critical functions, as installed in aircraft,
to the defined HIRF environment in
paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed
value using laboratory tests, in
paragraph 2, as follows:
(1) The applicant may demonstrate
that the operation and operational
capability of the installed electrical and
electronic systems that perform critical
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
75002
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
functions are not adversely affected
when the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF
environment defined below:
Frequency
Field strength
(volts per meter)
Peak
10 kHz–100 kHz ...........
100 kHz–500 kHz .........
500 kHz–2 MHz ............
2 MHz–30 MHz .............
30 MHz–70 MHz ...........
70 MHz–100 MHz .........
100 MHz–200 MHz .......
200 MHz–400 MHz .......
400 MHz–700 MHz .......
700 MHz–1 GHz ...........
1 GHz–2 GHz ...............
2 GHz–4 GHz ...............
4 GHz–6 GHz ...............
6 GHz–8 GHz ...............
8 GHz–12 GHz .............
12 GHz–18 GHz ...........
18 GHz–40 GHz ...........
Average
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
700
700
2000
3000
3000
1000
3000
2000
600
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
50
100
200
200
200
200
300
200
200
The field strengths are expressed in terms
of peak root-mean-square (rms) values.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by
a system test and analysis that the
electrical and electronic systems that
perform critical functions can withstand
a minimum threat of 100 volts per
meter, electrical field strength, from 10
kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test to
show compliance with the HIRF
requirements, no credit is given for
signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must
be performed by the applicant for
approval by the FAA to identify either
electrical or electronic systems that
perform critical functions. The term
‘‘critical’’ means those functions, whose
failure would contribute to, or cause, a
failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the
airplane. The systems identified by the
hazard analysis that perform critical
functions are candidates for the
application of HIRF requirements. A
system may perform both critical and
non-critical functions. Primary
electronic flight display systems, and
their associated components, perform
critical functions such as attitude,
altitude, and airspeed indication. The
HIRF requirements apply only to critical
functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements
may be demonstrated by tests, analysis,
models, similarity with existing
systems, or any combination of these.
Service experience alone is not
acceptable since normal flight
operations may not include an exposure
to the HIRF environment. Reliance on a
system with similar design features for
redundancy as a means of protection
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
against the effects of external HIRF is
generally insufficient since all elements
of a redundant system are likely to be
exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the
Raytheon Model B200, B200C, 300,
B300, and B300C. Should Envoy
Aerospace apply at a later date for a
supplemental type certificate to modify
any other model on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well under the provisions of § 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several
prior instances and has been derived
without substantive change from those
previously issued. It is unlikely that
prior public comment would result in a
significant change from the substance
contained herein. For this reason, and
because a delay would significantly
affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has
determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and
impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon
issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to
submit views that may not have been
submitted in response to the prior
opportunities for comment described
above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.101; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for the Raytheon
Model B200, B200C, 300, B300, and
B300C airplanes modified by Envoy
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Aerospace to add the Universal
Avionics EFI–890R system.
1. Protection of Electrical and
Electronic Systems from High Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system
that performs critical functions must be
designed and installed to ensure that the
operations, and operational capabilities
of these systems to perform critical
functions, are not adversely affected
when the airplane is exposed to high
intensity radiated electromagnetic fields
external to the airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following definition
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
whose failure would contribute to, or
cause, a failure condition that would
prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on
December 5, 2005.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–24159 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM337; Special Conditions No.
25–310–SC]
Special Conditions: Raytheon Aircraft
Company Model HS.125 Airplanes;
High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for a Raytheon Aircraft Company
Model HS.125 airplane modified by
AeroMech Incorporated. This modified
airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature when compared to the
state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. The modification
incorporates the installation of
Innovative Solutions and Support air
data display units (ADDU). These
systems perform critical functions. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the protection of
these systems from the effects of highintensity radiated fields (HIRF). These
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75000-75002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24159]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE236, Special Condition 23-176-SC]
Special Conditions; Envoy Aerospace; EFIS on the Raytheon Model
B200, B200C, 300, B300, and B300C; Protection of Systems for High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to Envoy Aerospace, 5027
Switch Grass Lane, Naperville, Illinois 60564-5368, for a Supplemental
Type Certificate for the Raytheon B200, B200C, 300, B300, and B300C
models. These models will have novel and unusual design features when
compared to the state of technology envisaged in the applicable
airworthiness standards. These novel and unusual design features
include the installation of an electronic flight instrument system
(EFIS) and a navigation display. The EFIS consists of the Universal
Avionics, Inc. EFI-890R system for which the applicable regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate airworthiness standards for the
protection of these systems from the effects of high intensity radiated
fields (HIRF). The installation includes three EFI-890R Flat Panel
Displays (two Primary Flight Displays Pilot/Copilot and one
Navigational Display), and supporting equipment. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these
airplanes.
[[Page 75001]]
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is December 5,
2005. Comments must be received on or before January 18, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk,
Docket No. CE236, Room 506, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
All comments must be marked: Docket No. CE236. Comments may be
inspected in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays,
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wes Ryan, Aerospace Engineer,
Standards Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329-4127.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because
these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design
approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the
substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public
comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making
these special conditions effective upon issuance.
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views,
or arguments, as they may desire. Communications should identify the
regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the
address specified above. All communications received on or before the
closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The
special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received.
All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for
examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing
date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their
comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. CE236.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Background
Envoy Aerospace made application to the FAA for a new Supplemental
Type Certificate for several Raytheon King Air Models. The Raytheon
Model B200, B200C, 300, B300, and B300C are currently approved under TC
No. A24CE. The proposed modification incorporates a novel or unusual
design features, such as a digital Primary Flight Display, that may be
vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec. 21.101, Envoy
Aerospace must show that the modified aircraft meet the original
certification basis for the airplane, as listed on Type Data Sheet
A24CE, additional certification requirements added for the Universal
Avionics EFI-890R system, exemptions, if any; and the special
conditions adopted by this rulemaking action. The rules that were
applied at Part 23 Amendment 54 for the EFI-890R installation include
Sec. Sec. 23.1301, 23.1311, 23.1309, 23.1321, 23.1322, 23.1325, and
23.1543.
Discussion
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards
because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions, as appropriate, as defined in Sec. 11.19, are
issued in accordance with Sec. 11.38 after public notice and become
part of the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model already included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
the special conditions would also apply to the other model under the
provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
Envoy Aerospace plans to incorporate certain novel and unusual
design features into the Raytheon King Air Models for which the
airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for protection from the effects of HIRF. These features
include EFIS, which are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were
not envisaged by the existing regulations for this type of airplane.
Protection of Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in
aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that
perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due
to the use of sensitive solid-state advanced components in analog and
digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily
responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and
voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems
performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation
that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed.
Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for
radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has
increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the
effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to
cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is
undefined.
The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane
design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level
of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures
against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design
and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels
in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of
operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio
frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane
be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the
electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external
threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are
believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be
exposed in the operating environment.
These special conditions require qualification of systems that
perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined
HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using
laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
(1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and
operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic
systems that perform critical
[[Page 75002]]
functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft is exposed to
the HIRF environment defined below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field strength
(volts per meter)
Frequency -------------------
Peak Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz...................................... 50 50
100 kHz-500 kHz..................................... 50 50
500 kHz-2 MHz....................................... 50 50
2 MHz-30 MHz........................................ 100 100
30 MHz-70 MHz....................................... 50 50
70 MHz-100 MHz...................................... 50 50
100 MHz-200 MHz..................................... 100 100
200 MHz-400 MHz..................................... 100 100
400 MHz-700 MHz..................................... 700 50
700 MHz-1 GHz....................................... 700 100
1 GHz-2 GHz......................................... 2000 200
2 GHz-4 GHz......................................... 3000 200
4 GHz-6 GHz......................................... 3000 200
6 GHz-8 GHz......................................... 1000 200
8 GHz-12 GHz........................................ 3000 300
12 GHz-18 GHz....................................... 2000 200
18 GHz-40 GHz....................................... 600 200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square
(rms) values.
or,
(2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis
that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical
functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter,
electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test
to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for
signal attenuation due to installation.
A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant
for approval by the FAA to identify either electrical or electronic
systems that perform critical functions. The term ``critical'' means
those functions, whose failure would contribute to, or cause, a failure
condition that would prevent the continued safe flight and landing of
the airplane. The systems identified by the hazard analysis that
perform critical functions are candidates for the application of HIRF
requirements. A system may perform both critical and non-critical
functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, and their
associated components, perform critical functions such as attitude,
altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements apply only to
critical functions.
Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests,
analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination
of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal
flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment.
Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a
means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally
insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be
exposed to the fields concurrently.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Raytheon Model B200, B200C, 300, B300, and B300C. Should Envoy
Aerospace apply at a later date for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model on the same type certificate to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and
affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these
features on the airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a
delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane,
which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and
comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for
adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting
comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have
been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment
described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.101; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Raytheon Model B200, B200C, 300,
B300, and B300C airplanes modified by Envoy Aerospace to add the
Universal Avionics EFI-890R system.
1. Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF). Each system that performs critical
functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the operations,
and operational capabilities of these systems to perform critical
functions, are not adversely affected when the airplane is exposed to
high intensity radiated electromagnetic fields external to the
airplane.
2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would
contribute to, or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on December 5, 2005.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-24159 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P