Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions, 75028-75036 [05-23944]
Download as PDF
75028
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
in Executive Order 13132. FDA has
determined that the final rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the final rule
does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
IX. References
The following references have been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. (FDA has verified the
Web site addresses, but we are not
responsible for subsequent changes to
the Web sites after this document
publishes in the Federal Register).
1. ‘‘Table of Reportable Events Following
Vaccination,’’ https://www.vaers.hhs.gov/
reportable.htm.
2. ‘‘Guidance for Industry: How to
Complete the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System Form (VAERS–1)’’,
September 1998, https://www.fda.gov/cber/
gdlns/vaers-1.pdf.
3. ‘‘Estimated Vaccination Coverage With
3+DTP Among Children 19–35 Months of
Age by Race/Ethnicity, and by State and
Immunization Action Plan Area—U.S.,
National Immunization Survey, Q3/2000–Q2/
2001’’, https://www.cdc.gov/nip/coverage/
NIS/00-01/tab19-3dpt_race_iap.htm.
4. Protecting Our Kids: What Is Causing the
Current Shortage in Childhood Vaccines?—
Testimony Before the Committee on
Governmental Affairs, United States Senate,
June 12, 2002, https://www.cdc.gov/nip/news/
testimonies/vac-shortages-walt-6-122002.htm.
5. 61 FR 40153, August 1, 1996.
6. Colditz, et al., ‘‘Efficacy of BCG Vaccine
in the Prevention of Tuberculosis: Meta
Analysis of the Published Literature,’’
Journal of the American Medical Association,
271:698–702, 1994.
7. https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
05/transcripts/2005-4087T2.htm
8. https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
04/transcripts/4038t1.htm
9. https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/
03/transcripts/3948t1.txt
10. https://www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/
leverhnbk.pdf
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 610
Biologics, Labeling, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Health Service Act, and under authority
delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, 21 CFR part 610 is amended
as follows:
PART 610—GENERAL BIOLOGICAL
PRODUCTS STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 610 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 355, 360, 360c, 360d, 360h, 360i, 371,
372, 374, 381; 42 U.S.C. 216, 262, 263, 263a,
264.
2. Section 610.21 is amended by
revising the entry ‘‘Tetanus Immune
Globulin (Human), 50 units of tetanus
antitoxin per milliliter’’ under the
heading ‘‘ANTIBODIES’’ to read as
follows:
I
§ 610.21
Limits of potency.
*
*
*
*
*
ANTIBODIES
*
*
*
*
*
Tetanus Immune Globulin (Human),
250 units of tetanus antitoxin per
container.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 12, 2005.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 05–24224 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9234]
RIN 1545–AU98
Obligations of States and Political
Subdivisions
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations on the definition of private
activity bond applicable to tax-exempt
bonds issued by State and local
governments. These regulations affect
issuers of tax-exempt bonds and provide
needed guidance for applying the
private activity bond restrictions to
refunding issues.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective February 17, 2006.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see § 1.141–15(j) of these
regulations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Johanna Som de Cerff, (202) 622–3980
(not a toll-free number).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends the Income
Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
section 141 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) by providing rules on the
application of the private activity bond
tests to refunding issues. This document
also amends the Income Tax
Regulations under sections 145, 149 and
150 by providing rules on certain
related matters.
On May 14, 2003, the IRS published
in the Federal Register a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–113007–99)
(68 FR 25845) (the proposed
regulations) relating to the matters
addressed in this Treasury decision. A
public hearing on the proposed
regulations was scheduled for
September 9, 2003. However, the public
hearing was cancelled because no
requests to speak were received. Written
comments on the proposed regulations
were received. After consideration of all
the written comments, the proposed
regulations are adopted as revised by
this Treasury decision (the final
regulations). The revisions are discussed
below.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Introduction
In general, under section 103, gross
income does not include the interest on
any State or local bond. However, this
exclusion does not apply to private
activity bonds (other than certain
qualified bonds). Section 141(a) defines
a private activity bond as any bond
issued as part of an issue that meets
either (1) the private business use test in
section 141(b)(1) and the private
security or payment test in section
141(b)(2) (the private business tests) or
(2) the private loan financing test in
section 141(c) (the private business tests
and the private loan financing test are
referred to collectively as the ‘‘private
activity bond tests’’).
The private business use test is met if
more than 10 percent of the proceeds of
an issue are to be used for any private
business use. Section 141(b)(6) defines
private business use as use directly or
indirectly in a trade or business that is
carried on by any person other than a
governmental unit.
The private security or payment test
is met if the payment of the principal of,
or the interest on, more than 10 percent
of the proceeds of an issue is directly or
indirectly (1) secured by an interest in
property used or to be used for a private
business use, (2) secured by an interest
in payments in respect of such property,
or (3) to be derived from payments,
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
whether or not to the issuer, in respect
of property, or borrowed money, used or
to be used for a private business use.
The private loan financing test is
satisfied if more than the lesser of $5
million or 5 percent of the proceeds of
an issue are to be used to make or
finance loans to persons other than
governmental units.
On January 16, 1997, final regulations
(TD 8712) relating to the definition of
private activity bonds and related rules
under sections 103, 141, 142, 144, 145,
147, 148, and 150 were published in the
Federal Register (62 FR 2275) (the 1997
regulations). Under the 1997
regulations, the amount of private
business use of property financed by an
issue is equal to the average percentage
of private business use of that property
during a defined measurement period.
The measurement period begins on the
later of the issue date of the issue or the
date that the property is placed in
service and ends on the earlier of the
last date of the reasonably expected
economic life of the property or the
latest maturity date of any bond of the
issue financing the property
(determined without regard to any
optional redemption dates). In general,
under the 1997 regulations, the amount
of private security or private payments
is determined by comparing the present
value of the private security or private
payments to the present value of the
debt service to be paid over the term of
the issue, using the bond yield as the
discount rate. The 1997 regulations
reserve § 1.141–13 for rules regarding
the application of the private business
tests and the private loan financing test
to refunding issues.
B. Application of Private Activity Bond
Tests to Refunding Issues
1. In general. The proposed
regulations provide that, in general, a
refunding issue and a prior issue are
tested separately under section 141.
Thus, the determination of whether a
refunding issue consists of private
activity bonds generally does not
depend on whether the prior issue
consists of private activity bonds.
Commentators supported this separate
testing principle. The final regulations
retain this approach.
2. Allocation of proceeds. The
proposed regulations provide that, in
applying the private business tests and
the private loan financing test to a
refunding issue, the proceeds of the
refunding issue are allocated to the
same purpose investments (including
any private loan under section 141(c))
and expenditures as the proceeds of the
prior issue.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
Comments were not received on this
allocation provision. The final
regulations retain this rule.
3. Measurement of private business
use. The proposed regulations generally
provide that the amount of private
business use of a refunding issue is
determined based on the separate
measurement period for the refunding
issue under § 1.141–3(g) (for example,
without regard to any private business
use that occurred before the issue date
of the refunding issue). Thus, for
instance, if an issuer refunds a taxable
bond or an exempt facility bond, any
private business use of the refinanced
facilities before the issue date of the
refunding issue is disregarded in
applying the private business use test to
the refunding issue.
In the case of a refunding issue that
refunds a prior issue of governmental
bonds, however, the amount of private
business use is generally determined
based on a combined measurement
period. For purposes of the proposed
regulations, a governmental bond is any
bond that, when issued, purported to be
either a governmental bond, as defined
in § 1.150–1(b), or a qualified 501(c)(3)
bond, as defined in section 145(a). The
combined measurement period is the
period that begins on the first day of the
measurement period (as defined in
§ 1.141–3(g)) for the prior issue (or the
first issue of governmental bonds in the
case of a series of refundings of
governmental bonds) and ends on the
last day of the measurement period for
the refunding issue.
As an alternative to the combined
measurement period approach, the
proposed regulations permit issuers to
measure private business use based on
the separate measurement period of the
refunding issue, but only if the prior
issue of governmental bonds does not
meet the private business use test
during a shortened measurement period.
The shortened measurement period
begins on the first day of the
measurement period of the prior issue
(or the first issue of governmental bonds
in the case of a series of refundings of
governmental bonds) and ends on the
issue date of the refunding issue.
Whether a prior issue meets the private
business use test during the shortened
measurement period is determined
based on the actual use of proceeds,
without regard to the reasonable
expectations test of § 1.141–2(d).
Commentators suggested that the
proposed regulations be modified with
respect to governmental bonds: (1) To
delete the shortened measurement
period concept; (2) to provide, absent
any evidence to the contrary, and
subject to general anti-abuse rules, a
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75029
presumption that an issuer did not
exceed the ten percent private business
use limit; and (3) to specify that the
amount of private business use of the
refunding issue is the amount of private
business use during either the separate
measurement period for the refunding
issue or the combined measurement
period.
These commentators suggested that a
separate measurement period approach
would not allow an issuer to increase
the amount of private business use
without jeopardizing the tax exemption
of the prior issue, and thus an issuer
generally should be permitted to
measure private business use of a
refunding issue using a separate
measurement period. Nevertheless,
these commentators suggested that the
regulations include a general anti-abuse
rule. They noted, for example, that a
separate measurement period approach
could permit an issuer to have an
additional ten percent of private
business use in connection with a
refunding issue after the period of
limitations for the prior bonds has run.
These commentators suggested that, in
such a situation, it would be fair to
consider the refunding issue to be an
abuse if the issuer is deliberately trying
to exploit the private business use limit.
The final regulations retain the basic
approach of the proposed regulations to
measuring private business use. The
final regulations do not adopt the
suggestions to delete the shortened
measurement period concept and to
provide that private business use may
be measured during either a separate or
combined measurement period. These
suggestions are not adopted because
they could result in more private
business use than otherwise would be
permitted after the expiration of the
period of limitations for the prior issue.
The final regulations do not adopt the
suggestion to create a presumption that
the private business use limit was not
exceeded with respect to prior bonds. It
is not clear such a presumption is
warranted in all cases.
The final regulations also do not
adopt the suggestion to add an antiabuse rule. The IRS and Treasury
Department have concluded that the
bright-line rule in the proposed
regulations for determining when
issuers must apply a combined
measurement period and when issuers
may apply either a combined
measurement period or a separate
measurement period is an appropriate
methodology for measuring the private
business use of a refunding issue and
provides more administrative certainty
than would be provided by an antiabuse rule.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
75030
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Commentators expressed concern
regarding an issuer’s ability to establish
the amount of private business use
during a combined measurement period
if the period begins a significant amount
of time before the refunding bonds are
issued. They noted that, in some cases,
the refunded bonds may have been
issued as many as twenty years or more
before the refunding bonds are issued.
These commentators stated that
document retention policies vary by
issuer and retaining or locating the
necessary information over such long
periods of time may be difficult.
The final regulations apply
prospectively and only to refunding
bonds that are subject to the 1997
regulations. In general, under § 1.141–
15, the 1997 regulations apply to
refunding bonds only if, among other
requirements, (1) the refunded bonds
were originally issued on or after May
16, 1997, (2) the weighted average
maturity of the refunding bonds is
longer than the weighted average
maturity of the refunded bonds, or (3)
the issuer chooses to apply the 1997
regulations to the refunding bonds.
Thus, the final regulations will not
apply to any refunding of bonds
originally issued before May 16, 1997,
unless the issuer extends the weighted
average maturity of the prior bonds or
otherwise chooses to have the 1997
regulations apply to the refunding
bonds (or an earlier issue of bonds).
In addition, to address commentators’
concerns, the final regulations provide
transitional relief for refundings of
bonds originally issued before May 16,
1997 (the effective date of the 1997
regulations). Specifically, the final
regulations provide that, if the prior
issue (or, in the case of a series of
refundings of governmental bonds, the
first issue of governmental bonds in the
series) was issued before May 16, 1997,
then the issuer, at its option, may treat
the combined measurement period as
beginning on the date (the transition
date) that is the earlier of (1) December
19, 2005 or (2) the first date on which
the prior issue (or an earlier issue in the
case of a series of refundings of
governmental bonds) became subject to
the 1997 regulations. This transitional
relief, which was not contained in the
proposed regulations, has been added to
the final regulations in response to
concerns expressed by commentators
regarding an issuer’s ability to establish
the amount of private business use
during a combined measurement period
if the period begins a significant amount
of time before the refunding bonds are
issued.
Some commentators requested
guidance on how the private business
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
tests apply to the shortened and
combined measurement periods for
refundings of bonds originally issued
before the effective date of the Tax
Reform Act of 1986, 100 Stat. 2085 (the
1986 Act), if the refunding does not
qualify for transitional relief under the
1986 Act or prior law. Specifically,
commentators requested guidance on
whether (1) the ten-percent private
business use limitation under the 1986
Act or (2) the applicable private
business use limitation under prior law
(for example, the 25-percent limitation
under the Internal Revenue Code of
1954) applies in the case of a nontransitioned refunding of a bond issued
under law in effect prior to the 1986
Act. The final regulations clarify in an
example that the 1986 Act limitations
apply to the shortened and combined
measurement periods. The issuer,
however, may treat these periods as
beginning on the transition date
described above.
4. Measurement of private security
and private payments. Under the
proposed regulations, if the amount of
private business use is determined
based on the separate measurement
period for the refunding issue, then the
amount of private security and private
payments allocable to the refunding
issue is determined under § 1.141–4 by
treating the refunding issue as a separate
issue. On the other hand, if the amount
of private business use is determined
based on a combined measurement
period, then the amount of private
security and private payments allocable
to the refunding issue is determined
under § 1.141–4 by treating the
refunding issue and all earlier issues
taken into account in determining the
combined measurement period as a
combined issue. The proposed
regulations contain specific rules for
determining the present value of the
debt service on, and the private security
and private payments allocable to, a
combined issue.
Commentators requested clarification
regarding how the private security or
payment test applies under the
combined issue methodology in the case
of a refunding of only a portion of the
original principal amount of a prior
issue. The final regulations clarify that,
in these circumstances, (1) the refunded
portion of the prior issue is treated as a
separate issue and (2) any private
security or private payments with
respect to the prior issue are allocated
ratably between the combined issue and
the unrefunded portion of the prior
issue in a consistent manner based on
relative debt service.
The proposed regulations also permit
an issuer to use the yield on a prior
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
issue of governmental bonds to
determine the present value of private
security or private payments under
arrangements that were not entered into
in contemplation of the refunding issue.
For this purpose, any arrangement that
was entered into more than one year
before the issue date of the refunding
issue will be treated as not entered into
in contemplation of the refunding issue.
Comments were not received on this
special rule for arrangements not
entered into in contemplation of the
refunding issue. The final regulations
retain this provision.
5. Multipurpose issue allocations.
Section 1.148–9(h) permits an issuer to
use a reasonable, consistently applied
allocation method to treat the portion of
a multipurpose issue allocable to a
separate purpose as a separate issue for
certain of the arbitrage provisions of
section 148. Section 1.141–13(d) of the
proposed regulations allows an issuer to
apply § 1.148–9(h) to a multipurpose
issue for certain purposes under section
141. An allocation will not be
reasonable for this purpose if it achieves
more favorable results under section 141
than could be achieved with actual
separate issues. In addition, allocations
under the proposed regulations and
§ 1.148–9(h) must be consistent for
purposes of sections 141 and 148. The
proposed regulations do not permit
allocations for purposes of section
141(c)(1) (relating to the private loan
financing test) or section 141(d)(1)
(relating to certain restrictions on
acquiring nongovernmental output
property).
Commentators supported the
multipurpose allocation provisions in
the proposed regulations. The final
regulations retain those provisions.
Commentators also requested
clarification that an allocation under
§ 1.141–13(d) may be made at any time.
The final regulations provide that an
allocation under § 1.141–13(d) may be
made at any time, but once made may
not be changed. The final regulations
also provide that the issue to be
allocated and each of the separate issues
under the allocation must consist of one
or more tax-exempt bonds. Thus, an
allocation of a multipurpose issue into
two or more separate issues is not
permitted under § 1.141–13(d) if, at the
time of the allocation, the issue to be
allocated or any of the separate issues
under the allocation consists of taxable
private activity bonds.
6. Application of reasonable
expectations test to certain refunding
bonds. Section 1.141–2(d) provides that
an issue consists of private activity
bonds if the issuer (1) reasonably
expects, as of the issue date, that the
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
issue will meet either the private
business tests or the private loan
financing test, or (2) takes a deliberate
action, subsequent to the issue date, that
causes the conditions of either the
private business tests or the private loan
financing test to be satisfied. Section
1.141–2(d)(3) provides, in general, that
a deliberate action is any action taken
by the issuer that is within its control.
The proposed regulations provide that
an action that would otherwise cause a
refunding issue to satisfy the private
business tests or the private loan
financing test is not taken into account
under the reasonable expectations test
of § 1.141–2(d) if (1) the action is not a
deliberate action within the meaning of
§ 1.141–2(d)(3), and (2) the weighted
average maturity of the refunding bonds
is not greater than the remaining
weighted average maturity of the prior
bonds.
Commentators suggested that the
limitation on the weighted average
maturity of the refunding bonds to the
remaining weighted average maturity of
the prior bonds could penalize issuers
for issuing shorter-term obligations
initially, or provide an incentive to
issue longer-term obligations initially.
These commentators requested that the
weighted average maturity of the
refunding bonds be limited only to 120
percent of the weighted average
reasonably expected economic life of
the property financed by the prior
bonds. The final regulations amend this
provision to provide that the weighted
average maturity of the refunding bonds
may not exceed the weighted average
reasonably expected economic life of
the property financed by the prior
bonds.
Commentators also requested that an
example illustrating this provision be
added to the regulations. The final
regulations add such an example.
7. Refundings of certain general
obligation bonds. Section 1.141–2(d)(5)
provides that the determination of
whether bonds of an issue are private
activity bonds may be based solely on
the issuer’s reasonable expectations as
of the issue date (and not on whether
there are any subsequent deliberate
actions) if, among other requirements,
the issue is an issue of general
obligation bonds of a general purpose
governmental unit that finances at least
25 separate purposes.
Commentators suggested that a
refunding issue should not consist of
private activity bonds if the prior issue
meets the requirements of § 1.141–
2(d)(5). The final regulations adopt this
comment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
C. Treatment of Issuance Costs
Financed by Prior Issue of Qualified
501(c)(3) Bonds
Under the 1997 regulations, the use of
proceeds of an issue of qualified
501(c)(3) bonds to pay issuance costs of
the issue is treated as a private business
use. The proposed regulations provide
that, solely for purposes of applying the
private business use test to a refunding
issue, the use of proceeds of the prior
issue (or any earlier issue in a series of
refundings) to pay issuance costs of the
prior issue (or the earlier issue) is
treated as a government use.
Comments were not received on this
provision. The final regulations retain
this rule.
D. Limitation on Advance Refundings of
Private Activity Bonds
Under section 149(d)(2), interest on a
bond is not excluded from gross income
if any portion of the issue of which the
bond is a part is issued to advance
refund a private activity bond (other
than a qualified 501(c)(3) bond). The
proposed regulations provide that, for
purposes of section 149(d)(2), the term
private activity bond includes a
qualified bond described in section
141(e) (other than a qualified 501(c)(3)
bond), regardless of whether the
refunding issue consists of private
activity bonds under the proposed
regulations. The proposed regulations
also provide that, for purposes of
section 149(d)(2), the term private
activity bond does not include a taxable
bond. Section 1.150–1(b) defines
taxable bond as any obligation the
interest on which is not excludable from
gross income under section 103.
Commentators recommended that the
regulations be modified to permit a taxexempt private activity bond to be
advance refunded by a governmental
bond if the nongovernmental entity’s
participation in the financing has been
terminated and the only beneficiary of
the financing is the governmental unit.
Based on the plain language of section
149(d)(2) and the policies underlying
that Code provision, the final
regulations do not adopt this comment.
Effective Date
The final regulations apply to bonds
that are (1) sold on or after February 17,
2006 and (2) subject to the 1997
regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75031
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Johanna Som de Cerff
and Laura W. Lederman, Office of Chief
Counsel (Tax-exempt and Government
Entities), Internal Revenue Service and
Stephen J. Watson, Office of Tax
Legislative Counsel, Department of the
Treasury. However, other personnel
from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read, in part, as
follows:
I
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.141–0 is amended by
adding entries to the table in numerical
order for §§ 1.141–13 and 1.141–15(j) to
read as follows:
I
§ 1.141–0
Table of contents.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.141–13 Refunding issues.
(a) In general.
(b) Application of private business use test
and private loan financing test.
(1) Allocation of proceeds.
(2) Determination of amount of private
business use.
(c) Application of private security or
payment test.
(1) Separate issue treatment.
(2) Combined issue treatment.
(3) Special rule for arrangements not
entered into in contemplation of the
refunding issue.
(d) Multipurpose issue allocations.
(1) In general.
(2) Exceptions.
(e) Application of reasonable expectations
test to certain refunding bonds.
(f) Special rule for refundings of certain
general obligation bonds.
(g) Examples.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.141–15
Effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Effective dates for certain regulations
relating to refundings.
*
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
*
*
19DER1
*
*
75032
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Par. 3. In § 1.141–1, paragraph (b) is
amended by revising the definition of
governmental bond to read as follows:
I
§ 1.141–1 Definitions and rules of general
application.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Governmental bond has the same
meaning as in § 1.150–1(b), except that,
for purposes of § 1.141–13,
governmental bond is defined in
§ 1.141–13(b)(2)(iv).
*
*
*
*
*
I Par. 4. Section 1.141–13 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.141–13
Refunding issues.
(a) In general. Except as provided in
this section, a refunding issue and a
prior issue are tested separately under
section 141. Thus, the determination of
whether a refunding issue consists of
private activity bonds generally does not
depend on whether the prior issue
consists of private activity bonds.
(b) Application of private business use
test and private loan financing test—(1)
Allocation of proceeds. In applying the
private business use test and the private
loan financing test to a refunding issue,
the proceeds of the refunding issue are
allocated to the same expenditures and
purpose investments as the proceeds of
the prior issue.
(2) Determination of amount of
private business use—(i) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, the amount of
private business use of a refunding issue
is determined under § 1.141–3(g), based
on the measurement period for that
issue (for example, without regard to
any private business use that occurred
prior to the issue date of the refunding
issue).
(ii) Refundings of governmental
bonds. In applying the private business
use test to a refunding issue that refunds
a prior issue of governmental bonds, the
amount of private business use of the
refunding issue is the amount of private
business use—
(A) During the combined
measurement period; or
(B) At the option of the issuer, during
the period described in paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section, but only if,
without regard to the reasonable
expectations test of § 1.141–2(d), the
prior issue does not satisfy the private
business use test, based on a
measurement period that begins on the
first day of the combined measurement
period and ends on the issue date of the
refunding issue.
(iii) Combined measurement period—
(A) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this section,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
the combined measurement period is
the period that begins on the first day
of the measurement period (as defined
in § 1.141–3(g)) for the prior issue (or, in
the case of a series of refundings of
governmental bonds, the first issue of
governmental bonds in the series) and
ends on the last day of the measurement
period for the refunding issue.
(B) Transition rule for refundings of
bonds originally issued before May 16,
1997. If the prior issue (or, in the case
of a series of refundings of governmental
bonds, the first issue of governmental
bonds in the series) was issued before
May 16, 1997, then the issuer, at its
option, may treat the combined
measurement period as beginning on the
date (the transition date) that is the
earlier of December 19, 2005 or the first
date on which the prior issue (or an
earlier issue in the case of a series of
refundings of governmental bonds)
became subject to the 1997 regulations
(as defined in § 1.141–15(b)). If the
issuer treats the combined measurement
period as beginning on the transition
date in accordance with this paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(B), then paragraph (c)(2) of
this section shall be applied by treating
the transition date as the issue date of
the earliest issue, by treating the bonds
as reissued on the transition date at an
issue price equal to the value of the
bonds (as determined under § 1.148–
4(e)) on that date, and by disregarding
any private security or private payments
before the transition date.
(iv) Governmental bond. For purposes
of this section, the term governmental
bond means any bond that, when
issued, purported to be a governmental
bond, as defined in § 1.150–1(b), or a
qualified 501(c)(3) bond, as defined in
section 145(a).
(v) Special rule for refundings of
qualified 501(c)(3) bonds with
governmental bonds. For purposes of
applying this paragraph (b)(2) to a
refunding issue that refunds a qualified
501(c)(3) bond, any use of the property
refinanced by the refunding issue before
the issue date of the refunding issue by
a 501(c)(3) organization with respect to
its activities that do not constitute an
unrelated trade or business under
section 513(a) is treated as government
use.
(c) Application of private security or
payment test—(1) Separate issue
treatment. If the amount of private
business use of a refunding issue is
determined based on the measurement
period for that issue in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(i) or (b)(2)(ii)(B) of this
section, then the amount of private
security and private payments allocable
to the refunding issue is determined
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
under § 1.141–4 by treating the
refunding issue as a separate issue.
(2) Combined issue treatment. If the
amount of private business use of a
refunding issue is determined based on
the combined measurement period for
that issue in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(A) of this section, then the
amount of private security and private
payments allocable to the refunding
issue is determined under § 1.141–4 by
treating the refunding issue and all
earlier issues taken into account in
determining the combined measurement
period as a combined issue. For this
purpose, the present value of the private
security and private payments is
compared to the present value of the
debt service on the combined issue
(other than debt service paid with
proceeds of any refunding bond).
Present values are computed as of the
issue date of the earliest issue taken into
account in determining the combined
measurement period (the earliest issue).
Except as provided in paragraph (c)(3)
of this section, present values are
determined by using the yield on the
combined issue as the discount rate.
The yield on the combined issue is
determined by taking into account
payments on the refunding issue and all
earlier issues taken into account in
determining the combined measurement
period (other than payments made with
proceeds of any refunding bond), and
based on the issue price of the earliest
issue. In the case of a refunding of only
a portion of the original principal
amount of a prior issue, the refunded
portion of the prior issue is treated as a
separate issue and any private security
or private payments with respect to the
prior issue are allocated ratably between
the combined issue and the unrefunded
portion of the prior issue in a consistent
manner based on relative debt service.
See paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this
section for special rules relating to
certain refundings of governmental
bonds originally issued before May 16,
1997.
(3) Special rule for arrangements not
entered into in contemplation of the
refunding issue. In applying the private
security or payment test to a refunding
issue that refunds a prior issue of
governmental bonds, the issuer may use
the yield on the prior issue to determine
the present value of private security and
private payments under arrangements
that were not entered into in
contemplation of the refunding issue.
For this purpose, any arrangement that
was entered into more than 1 year
before the issue date of the refunding
issue is treated as not entered into in
contemplation of the refunding issue.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Multipurpose issue allocations—
(1) In general. For purposes of section
141, unless the context clearly requires
otherwise, § 1.148–9(h) applies to
allocations of multipurpose issues (as
defined in § 1.148–1(b)), including
allocations involving the refunding
purposes of the issue. An allocation
under this paragraph (d) may be made
at any time, but once made may not be
changed. An allocation is not reasonable
under this paragraph (d) if it achieves
more favorable results under section 141
than could be achieved with actual
separate issues. The issue to be
allocated and each of the separate issues
under the allocation must consist of one
or more tax-exempt bonds. Allocations
made under this paragraph (d) and
§ 1.148–9(h) must be consistent for
purposes of section 141 and section 148.
(2) Exceptions. This paragraph (d)
does not apply for purposes of sections
141(c)(1) and 141(d)(1).
(e) Application of reasonable
expectations test to certain refunding
bonds. An action that would otherwise
cause a refunding issue to satisfy the
private business tests or the private loan
financing test is not taken into account
under the reasonable expectations test
of § 1.141–2(d) if—
(1) The action is not a deliberate
action within the meaning of § 1.141–
2(d)(3); and
(2) The weighted average maturity of
the refunding bonds is not greater than
the weighted average reasonably
expected economic life of the property
financed by the prior bonds.
(f) Special rule for refundings of
certain general obligation bonds.
Notwithstanding any other provision of
this section, a refunding issue does not
consist of private activity bonds if—
(1) The prior issue meets the
requirements of § 1.141–2(d)(5) (relating
to certain general obligation bond
programs that finance a large number of
separate purposes); or
(2) The refunded portion of the prior
issue is part of a series of refundings of
all or a portion of an issue that meets
the requirements of § 1.141–2(d)(5).
(g) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this section:
Example 1. Measuring private business
use. In 2002, Authority A issues tax-exempt
bonds that mature in 2032 to acquire an
office building. The measurement period for
the 2002 bonds under § 1.141–3(g) is 30
years. At the time A acquires the building, it
enters into a 10-year lease with a
nongovernmental person under which the
nongovernmental person will use 5 percent
of the building in its trade or business during
each year of the lease term. In 2007, A issues
bonds to refund the 2002 bonds. The 2007
bonds mature on the same date as the 2002
bonds and have a measurement period of 25
years under § 1.141–3(g). Under paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(A) of this section, the amount of
private business use of the proceeds of the
2007 bonds is 1.67 percent, which equals the
amount of private business use during the
combined measurement period (5 percent of
1⁄3 of the 30-year combined measurement
period). In addition, the 2002 bonds do not
satisfy the private business use test, based on
a measurement period beginning on the first
day of the measurement period for the 2002
bonds and ending on the issue date of the
2007 bonds, because only 5 percent of the
proceeds of the 2002 bonds are used for a
private business use during that period.
Thus, under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) of this
section, A may treat the amount of private
business use of the 2007 bonds as 1 percent
(5 percent of 1⁄5 of the 25-year measurement
period for the 2007 bonds). The 2007 bonds
do not satisfy the private business use test.
Example 2. Combined issue yield
computation. (i) On January 1, 2000, County
B issues 20-year bonds to finance the
acquisition of a municipal auditorium. The
2000 bonds have a yield of 7.7500 percent,
compounded annually, and an issue price
and par amount of $100 million. The debt
service payments on the 2000 bonds are as
follows:
Date
1/1/01
1/1/02
1/1/03
1/1/04
1/1/05
1/1/06
1/1/07
1/1/08
1/1/09
1/1/10
1/1/11
Debt service
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
1/1/12
1/1/13
1/1/14
1/1/15
1/1/16
1/1/17
1/1/18
1/1/19
1/1/20
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Date
1/1/06
1/1/07
1/1/08
1/1/09
1/1/10
1/1/11
1/1/12
1/1/13
1/1/14
1/1/15
1/1/16
1/1/17
1/1/18
1/1/19
1/1/20
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
..............................
Debt service
$9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
138,227,511
(iii) In accordance with § 1.141–15(h), B
chooses to apply § 1.141–13 (together with
the other provisions set forth in § 1.141–
15(h)), to the 2005 bonds. For purposes of
determining the amount of private security
and private payments with respect to the
2005 bonds, the 2005 bonds and the refunded
portion of the 2000 bonds are treated as a
combined issue under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section. The yield on the combined issue is
determined in accordance with §§ 1.148–4,
1.141–4(b)(2)(iii) and 1.141–13(c)(2). Under
this methodology, the yield on the combined
issue is 7.1062 percent per year compounded
annually, illustrated as follows:
Total debt service
........................
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
..............................
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
Sfmt 4700
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
(ii) On January 1, 2005, B issues 15-year
bonds to refund all of the outstanding 2000
bonds maturing after January 1, 2005 (in the
aggregate principal amount of $86,500,000).
The 2005 bonds have a yield of 6.0000
percent, compounded annually, and an issue
price and par amount of $89,500,000. The
debt service payments on the 2005 bonds are
as follows:
Refunding
debt service
Fmt 4700
Debt service
199,929,400
Previous debt
service on refunded portion
of prior issue
Date
1/1/00
1/1/01
1/1/02
1/1/03
1/1/04
1/1/05
1/1/06
1/1/07
1/1/08
1/1/09
$9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
9,996,470
Date
75033
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Present value on
1/1/00
($86,500,000.00)
6,245,945.33
5,831,545.62
5,444,640.09
5,083,404.58
4,746,135.95
6,104,023.84
5,699,040.20
5,320,926.00
4,967,898.55
75034
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Previous debt
service on refunded portion
of prior issue
Date
1/1/10
1/1/11
1/1/12
1/1/13
1/1/14
1/1/15
1/1/16
1/1/17
1/1/18
1/1/19
1/1/20
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
Refunding
debt service
Total debt service
Present value on
1/1/00
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
4,638,293.40
4,330,556.57
4,043,237.15
3,774,980.51
3,524,521.90
3,290,680.46
3,072,353.70
2,868,512.26
2,678,195.09
2,500,504.89
2,334,603.90
33,448,965
Example 3. Determination of private
payments allocable to combined issue. The
facts are the same as in Example 2. In
addition, on January 1, 2001, B enters into a
contract with a nongovernmental person for
the use of the auditorium. The contract
results in a private payment in the amount
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
138,227,511
171,676,4760.00
0.00
of $500,000 on each January 1 beginning on
January 1, 2001, and ending on January 1,
2020. Under paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
the amount of the private payments allocable
to the combined issue is determined by
treating the refunded portion of the 2000
bonds ($86,500,000 principal amount) as a
separate issue, and by allocating the total
private payments ratably between the
combined issue and the unrefunded portion
of the 2000 bonds ($13,500,000 principal
amount) based on relative debt service, as
follows:
Percentage
of private
payments
allocable to
combined
issue
Amount of
private payments allocable to
combined
issue
Private payments
1/1/01
1/1/02
1/1/03
1/1/04
1/1/05
1/1/06
1/1/07
1/1/08
1/1/09
1/1/10
1/1/11
1/1/12
1/1/13
1/1/14
1/1/15
1/1/16
1/1/17
1/1/18
1/1/19
1/1/20
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
.............................................................................................
Example 4. Refunding taxable bonds and
qualified bonds. (i) In 1999, City C issues
taxable bonds to finance the construction of
a facility for the furnishing of water. The
bonds are secured by revenues from the
facility. The facility is managed pursuant to
a management contract with a
nongovernmental person that gives rise to
private business use. In 2007, C terminates
the management contract and takes over the
operation of the facility. In 2009, C issues
bonds to refund the 1999 bonds. On the issue
date of the 2009 bonds, C reasonably expects
that the facility will not be used for a private
business use during the term of the 2009
bonds. In addition, during the term of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
$500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
$3,306,677
3,306,677
3,306,677
3,306,677
3,306,677
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
$6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
6,689,793
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
9,215,167
66.92
66.92
66.92
66.92
66.92
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
$334,608
334,608
334,608
334,608
334,608
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
$10,000,000
Date
Debt service
on
unrefunded
portion of
prior issue
$16,533,385
$171,676,476
....................
$9,173,039
2009 bonds, the facility is not used for a
private business use. Under paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section, the 2009 bonds do not
satisfy the private business use test because
the amount of private business use is based
on the measurement period for those bonds
and therefore does not take into account any
private business use that occurred pursuant
to the management contract.
(ii) The facts are the same as in paragraph
(i) of this Example 4, except that the 1999
bonds are issued as exempt facility bonds
under section 142(a)(4). The 2009 bonds do
not satisfy the private business use test.
Example 5. Multipurpose issue. In 2001,
State D issues bonds to finance the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Debt service on
combined issue
construction of two office buildings, Building
1 and Building 2. D expends an equal amount
of the proceeds on each building. D enters
into arrangements that result in 8 percent of
Building 1 and 12 percent of Building 2 being
used for a private business use during the
measurement period under § 1.141–3(g).
These arrangements result in a total of 10
percent of the proceeds of the 2001 bonds
being used for a private business use. In
2006, D purports to allocate, under paragraph
(d) of this section, an equal amount of the
outstanding 2001 bonds to Building 1 and
Building 2. D also enters into another private
business use arrangement with respect to
Building 1 that results in an additional 2
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
percent (and a total of 10 percent) of Building
1 being used for a private business use during
the measurement period. An allocation is not
reasonable under paragraph (d) of this
section if it achieves more favorable results
under section 141 than could be achieved
with actual separate issues. D’s allocation is
unreasonable because, if permitted, it would
result in more than 10 percent of the
proceeds of the 2001 bonds being used for a
private business use.
Example 6. Non-deliberate action. In 1998,
City E issues bonds to finance the purchase
of land and construction of a building (the
prior bonds). On the issue date of the prior
bonds, E reasonably expects that it will be
the sole user of the financed property for the
entire term of the bonds. In 2003, the federal
government acquires the financed property in
a condemnation action. In 2006, E issues
bonds to refund the prior bonds (the
refunding bonds). The weighted average
maturity of the refunding bonds is not greater
than the reasonably expected economic life
of the financed property. In general, under
§ 1.141–2(d) and this section, reasonable
expectations must be separately tested on the
issue date of a refunding issue. Under
paragraph (e) of this section, however, the
condemnation action is not taken into
account in applying the reasonable
expectations test to the refunding bonds
because the condemnation action is not a
deliberate action within the meaning of
§ 1.141–2(d)(3) and the weighted average
maturity of the refunding bonds is not greater
than the weighted average reasonably
expected economic life of the property
financed by the prior bonds. Thus, the
condemnation action does not cause the
refunding bonds to be private activity bonds.
Example 7. Non-transitioned refunding of
bonds subject to 1954 Code.
In 1985, County F issues bonds to finance
a court house. The 1985 bonds are subject to
the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954. In 2006, F issues bonds to refund all
of the outstanding 1985 bonds. The weighted
average maturity of the 2006 bonds is longer
than the remaining weighted average
maturity of the 1985 bonds. In addition, the
2006 bonds do not satisfy any transitional
rule for refundings in the Tax Reform Act of
1986, 100 Stat. 2085 (1986). Section 141 and
this section apply to determine whether the
2006 bonds are private activity bonds
including whether, for purposes of § 1.141–
13(b)(2)(ii)(B), the 1985 bonds satisfy the
private business use test based on a
measurement period that begins on the first
day of the combined measurement period for
the 2006 bonds and ends on the issue date
of the 2006 bonds.
I Par. 5. Section 1.141–15 is amended
by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (c), (d) and
(h) and adding paragraph (j) to read as
follows:
§ 1.141–15
Effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Effective dates—(1) In general.
Except as otherwise provided in this
section, §§ 1.141–0 through 1.141–6(a),
1.141–9 through 1.141–12, 1.141–14,
1.145–1 through 1.145–2(c), and the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:20 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
definition of bond documents contained
in § 1.150–1(b) (the 1997 regulations)
apply to bonds issued on or after May
16, 1997, that are subject to section 1301
of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat.
2602).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Refunding bonds. Except as
otherwise provided in this section, the
1997 regulations (defined in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section) do not apply to
any bonds issued on or after May 16,
1997, to refund a bond to which those
regulations do not apply unless—
(1) The refunding bonds are subject to
section 1301 of the Tax Reform Act of
1986 (100 Stat. 2602); and
(2)(i) The weighted average maturity
of the refunding bonds is longer than—
(A) The weighted average maturity of
the refunded bonds; or
(B) In the case of a short-term
obligation that the issuer reasonably
expects to refund with a long-term
financing (such as a bond anticipation
note), 120 percent of the weighted
average reasonably expected economic
life of the facilities financed; or
(ii) A principal purpose for the
issuance of the refunding bonds is to
make one or more new conduit loans.
(d) Permissive application of
regulations. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, the 1997
regulations (defined in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section) may be applied in
whole, but not in part, to actions taken
before February 23, 1998, with respect
to—
(1) Bonds that are outstanding on May
16, 1997, and subject to section 141; or
(2) Refunding bonds issued on or after
May 16, 1997, that are subject to 141.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Permissive retroactive application.
Except as provided in paragraphs (d), (e)
or (i) of this section, §§ 1.141–1 through
1.141–6(a), 1.141–7 through 1.141–14,
1.145–1 through 1.145–2, 1.149(d)–1(g),
1.150–1(a)(3), the definition of bond
documents contained in § 1.150–1(b)
and § 1.150–1(c)(3)(ii) may be applied
by issuers in whole, but not in part, to—
(1) Outstanding bonds that are sold
before February 17, 2006, and subject to
section 141; or
(2) Refunding bonds that are sold on
or after February 17, 2006, and subject
to section 141.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Effective dates for certain
regulations relating to refundings.
Except as otherwise provided in this
section, §§ 1.141–13, 1.145–2(d),
1.149(d)–1(g), 1.150–1(a)(3) and 1.150–
1(c)(3)(ii) apply to bonds that are sold
on or after February 17, 2006 and that
are subject to the 1997 regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75035
I Par. 6. Section 1.145–0 is amended by
adding an entry to the table in
numerical order for § 1.145–2(d) to read
as follows:
§ 1.145–0
Table of contents.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.145–2 Application of private activity
bond regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Issuance costs financed by prior
issue.
Par. 7. In § 1.145–2, paragraph (d) is
added to read as follows:
I
§ 1.145–2 Application of private activity
bond regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Issuance costs financed by prior
issue. Solely for purposes of applying
the private business use test to a
refunding issue under § 1.141–13, the
use of proceeds of the prior issue (or any
earlier issue in a series of refundings) to
pay issuance costs of the prior issue (or
the earlier issue) is treated as a
government use.
I Par. 8. Section 1.149(d)–1 is amended
by revising paragraph (g) and adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
§ 1.149(d)–1
refundings.
*
Limitations on advance
*
*
*
*
(g) Limitation on advance refundings
of private activity bonds. Under section
149(d)(2) and this section, interest on a
bond is not excluded from gross income
if any portion of the issue of which the
bond is a part is issued to advance
refund a private activity bond (other
than a qualified 501(c)(3) bond). For this
purpose, the term private activity
bond—
(1) Includes a qualified bond
described in section 141(e) (other than
a qualified 501(c)(3) bond), regardless of
whether the refunding issue consists of
private activity bonds under § 1.141–13;
and
(2) Does not include a taxable bond.
(h) Effective dates—(1) In general.
Except as provided in this paragraph
(h), this section applies to bonds issued
after June 30, 1993, to which §§ 1.148–
1 through 1.148–11 apply, including
conduit loans that are treated as issued
after June 30, 1993, under paragraph
(b)(4) of this section. In addition, this
section applies to any issue to which the
election described in § 1.148–11(b)(1) is
made.
(2) Special effective date for
paragraph (b)(3). Paragraph (b)(3) of this
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
75036
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 242 / Monday, December 19, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
section applies to any advance
refunding issue issued after May 28,
1991.
(3) Special effective date for
paragraph (f)(3). Paragraph (f)(3) of this
section applies to bonds sold on or after
July 8, 1997 and to any issue to which
the election described in § 1.148–
11(b)(1) is made. See § 1.148–11A(i) for
rules relating to certain bonds sold
before July 8, 1997.
(4) Special effective date for
paragraph (g). See § 1.141–15 for the
applicability date of paragraph (g) of
this section.
I Par 9. Section 1.150–1 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (c)(3)(ii)
to read as follows:
§ 1.150–1
Definitions.
(a) * * *
(3) Exceptions to general effective
date. See § 1.141–15 for the
applicability date of the definition of
bond documents contained in paragraph
(b) of this section and the effective date
of paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Exceptions. This paragraph (c)(3)
does not apply for purposes of sections
141, 144(a), 148, 149(d) and 149(g).
*
*
*
*
*
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: November 23, 2005.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 05–23944 Filed 12–16–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD14–04–116]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zones; Oahu, Maui, Hawaii,
and Kauai, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing
existing permanent security zones in
designated waters adjacent to the
islands of Oahu, Maui, Hawaii, and
Kauai, Hawaii. These revised security
zones are necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and facilities from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:05 Dec 16, 2005
Jkt 208001
acts of sabotage or other subversive acts,
accidents, or other causes of a similar
nature and will extend from the surface
of the water to the ocean floor. Some of
the revised security zones are
continuously activated and enforced at
all times, while others are activated and
enforced only during heightened threat
conditions. Entry into these Coast Guard
security zones while they are activated
and enforced is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port.
DATES: This rule is effective January 18,
2006.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket CGD14–04–116 and are available
for inspection or copying at Coast Guard
Sector Honolulu, between 7 a.m. and
3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Junior Grade Quincey
Adams, U. S. Coast Guard Sector
Honolulu at (808) 842–2600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 20, 2004, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Security Zones; Oahu, Maui,
Hawaii, and Kauai, Hawaii,’’ in the
Federal Register (69 FR 29114). We
received five letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held. On June
7, 2005, we published a supplemental
NPRM (SNPRM) entitled ‘‘Security
Zones; Oahu, Maui, HI, and Kauai, HI,’’
in the Federal Register (70 FR 33047).
We received one letter and one phone
call commenting on the SNPRM. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
The terrorist attacks against the
United States that occurred on
September 11, 2001, have emphasized
the need for the United States to
establish heightened security measures
in order to protect the public, ports and
waterways, and the maritime
transportation system from future acts of
terrorism or other subversive acts. The
terrorist organization Al Qaeda and
other similar groups remain committed
to conducting armed attacks against U.S.
interests, including civilian targets
within the United States. Accordingly,
the President has continued the national
emergencies he declared following the
attacks: national emergency with respect
to terrorist attacks, 70 FR 54229,
September 13, 2005; and national
emergency with respect to persons who
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commit, threaten to commit, or support
acts of terrorism, 70 FR 55703,
September 22, 2005. Pursuant to the
Magnuson Act, 50 U.S.C. 191, et seq.,
the President also has found that the
security of the United States is and
continues to be endangered by the
September 11, 2001 attacks (E.O. 13273,
67 FR 56215, September 3, 2002).
National security and intelligence
officials warn that future terrorist
attacks are likely.
In response to this threat, on April 25,
2003, the Coast Guard established
permanent security zones in designated
waters surrounding the Hawaiian
Islands (68 FR 20344). These security
zones have been in operation for more
than 2 years. We have conducted
periodic review of port and harbor
security procedures and considered the
oral feedback that local vessel operators
gave to Coast Guard units enforcing the
zones. In response, the Coast Guard is
continuing most of the current security
zones but is reducing the size and scope
of some to afford acceptable protection
to critical assets and maritime
infrastructure and minimize the
disruption to maritime commerce and
inconvenience to small entities.
This rule establishes permanentlyexisting security zones in the waters
surrounding the islands of Oahu, Maui,
Kauai, and Hawaii. Specifically, 13
permanent security zones affect the
following locations and facilities: (1)
Honolulu Harbor, Oahu; (2) Honolulu
Harbor General Anchorages B, C, and D,
Oahu; (3) Kalihi Channel and Keehi
Lagoon, Oahu; (4) Honolulu
International Airport, North Section,
Oahu; (5) Honolulu International
Airport, South Section, Oahu; (6)
Barbers Point Offshore Moorings, Oahu;
(7) Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu; (8)
Kahului Harbor, Maui; (9) Lahaina,
Maui; (10) Hilo Harbor, Hawaii; (11)
Kailua-Kona Harbor, Hawaii; (12)
Nawiliwili Harbor, Lihue, Kauai; and
(13) Port Allen, Kauai. When activated
and enforced by the Captain of the Port
or his or her representative, persons and
vessels must not enter these security
zones without the express permission of
the Captain of the Port.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
In response to our initial proposed
rule published on May 20, 2004, the
Coast Guard received five letters. Two
letters from the State of Hawaii are in
favor of the rulemaking and contained
no objections. One letter from a
maritime association is also in favor
with no objections. These three letters
recognize the need for the security
zones and reiterate the Coast Guard’s
reasons for proposing them, raising no
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 242 (Monday, December 19, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75028-75036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23944]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9234]
RIN 1545-AU98
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations on the definition of
private activity bond applicable to tax-exempt bonds issued by State
and local governments. These regulations affect issuers of tax-exempt
bonds and provide needed guidance for applying the private activity
bond restrictions to refunding issues.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective February 17,
2006.
Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. 1.141-
15(j) of these regulations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Johanna Som de Cerff, (202) 622-3980
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1)
under section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) by providing
rules on the application of the private activity bond tests to
refunding issues. This document also amends the Income Tax Regulations
under sections 145, 149 and 150 by providing rules on certain related
matters.
On May 14, 2003, the IRS published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG-113007-99) (68 FR 25845) (the proposed
regulations) relating to the matters addressed in this Treasury
decision. A public hearing on the proposed regulations was scheduled
for September 9, 2003. However, the public hearing was cancelled
because no requests to speak were received. Written comments on the
proposed regulations were received. After consideration of all the
written comments, the proposed regulations are adopted as revised by
this Treasury decision (the final regulations). The revisions are
discussed below.
Explanation of Provisions
A. Introduction
In general, under section 103, gross income does not include the
interest on any State or local bond. However, this exclusion does not
apply to private activity bonds (other than certain qualified bonds).
Section 141(a) defines a private activity bond as any bond issued as
part of an issue that meets either (1) the private business use test in
section 141(b)(1) and the private security or payment test in section
141(b)(2) (the private business tests) or (2) the private loan
financing test in section 141(c) (the private business tests and the
private loan financing test are referred to collectively as the
``private activity bond tests'').
The private business use test is met if more than 10 percent of the
proceeds of an issue are to be used for any private business use.
Section 141(b)(6) defines private business use as use directly or
indirectly in a trade or business that is carried on by any person
other than a governmental unit.
The private security or payment test is met if the payment of the
principal of, or the interest on, more than 10 percent of the proceeds
of an issue is directly or indirectly (1) secured by an interest in
property used or to be used for a private business use, (2) secured by
an interest in payments in respect of such property, or (3) to be
derived from payments,
[[Page 75029]]
whether or not to the issuer, in respect of property, or borrowed
money, used or to be used for a private business use.
The private loan financing test is satisfied if more than the
lesser of $5 million or 5 percent of the proceeds of an issue are to be
used to make or finance loans to persons other than governmental units.
On January 16, 1997, final regulations (TD 8712) relating to the
definition of private activity bonds and related rules under sections
103, 141, 142, 144, 145, 147, 148, and 150 were published in the
Federal Register (62 FR 2275) (the 1997 regulations). Under the 1997
regulations, the amount of private business use of property financed by
an issue is equal to the average percentage of private business use of
that property during a defined measurement period. The measurement
period begins on the later of the issue date of the issue or the date
that the property is placed in service and ends on the earlier of the
last date of the reasonably expected economic life of the property or
the latest maturity date of any bond of the issue financing the
property (determined without regard to any optional redemption dates).
In general, under the 1997 regulations, the amount of private security
or private payments is determined by comparing the present value of the
private security or private payments to the present value of the debt
service to be paid over the term of the issue, using the bond yield as
the discount rate. The 1997 regulations reserve Sec. 1.141-13 for
rules regarding the application of the private business tests and the
private loan financing test to refunding issues.
B. Application of Private Activity Bond Tests to Refunding Issues
1. In general. The proposed regulations provide that, in general, a
refunding issue and a prior issue are tested separately under section
141. Thus, the determination of whether a refunding issue consists of
private activity bonds generally does not depend on whether the prior
issue consists of private activity bonds.
Commentators supported this separate testing principle. The final
regulations retain this approach.
2. Allocation of proceeds. The proposed regulations provide that,
in applying the private business tests and the private loan financing
test to a refunding issue, the proceeds of the refunding issue are
allocated to the same purpose investments (including any private loan
under section 141(c)) and expenditures as the proceeds of the prior
issue.
Comments were not received on this allocation provision. The final
regulations retain this rule.
3. Measurement of private business use. The proposed regulations
generally provide that the amount of private business use of a
refunding issue is determined based on the separate measurement period
for the refunding issue under Sec. 1.141-3(g) (for example, without
regard to any private business use that occurred before the issue date
of the refunding issue). Thus, for instance, if an issuer refunds a
taxable bond or an exempt facility bond, any private business use of
the refinanced facilities before the issue date of the refunding issue
is disregarded in applying the private business use test to the
refunding issue.
In the case of a refunding issue that refunds a prior issue of
governmental bonds, however, the amount of private business use is
generally determined based on a combined measurement period. For
purposes of the proposed regulations, a governmental bond is any bond
that, when issued, purported to be either a governmental bond, as
defined in Sec. 1.150-1(b), or a qualified 501(c)(3) bond, as defined
in section 145(a). The combined measurement period is the period that
begins on the first day of the measurement period (as defined in Sec.
1.141-3(g)) for the prior issue (or the first issue of governmental
bonds in the case of a series of refundings of governmental bonds) and
ends on the last day of the measurement period for the refunding issue.
As an alternative to the combined measurement period approach, the
proposed regulations permit issuers to measure private business use
based on the separate measurement period of the refunding issue, but
only if the prior issue of governmental bonds does not meet the private
business use test during a shortened measurement period. The shortened
measurement period begins on the first day of the measurement period of
the prior issue (or the first issue of governmental bonds in the case
of a series of refundings of governmental bonds) and ends on the issue
date of the refunding issue. Whether a prior issue meets the private
business use test during the shortened measurement period is determined
based on the actual use of proceeds, without regard to the reasonable
expectations test of Sec. 1.141-2(d).
Commentators suggested that the proposed regulations be modified
with respect to governmental bonds: (1) To delete the shortened
measurement period concept; (2) to provide, absent any evidence to the
contrary, and subject to general anti-abuse rules, a presumption that
an issuer did not exceed the ten percent private business use limit;
and (3) to specify that the amount of private business use of the
refunding issue is the amount of private business use during either the
separate measurement period for the refunding issue or the combined
measurement period.
These commentators suggested that a separate measurement period
approach would not allow an issuer to increase the amount of private
business use without jeopardizing the tax exemption of the prior issue,
and thus an issuer generally should be permitted to measure private
business use of a refunding issue using a separate measurement period.
Nevertheless, these commentators suggested that the regulations include
a general anti-abuse rule. They noted, for example, that a separate
measurement period approach could permit an issuer to have an
additional ten percent of private business use in connection with a
refunding issue after the period of limitations for the prior bonds has
run. These commentators suggested that, in such a situation, it would
be fair to consider the refunding issue to be an abuse if the issuer is
deliberately trying to exploit the private business use limit.
The final regulations retain the basic approach of the proposed
regulations to measuring private business use. The final regulations do
not adopt the suggestions to delete the shortened measurement period
concept and to provide that private business use may be measured during
either a separate or combined measurement period. These suggestions are
not adopted because they could result in more private business use than
otherwise would be permitted after the expiration of the period of
limitations for the prior issue.
The final regulations do not adopt the suggestion to create a
presumption that the private business use limit was not exceeded with
respect to prior bonds. It is not clear such a presumption is warranted
in all cases.
The final regulations also do not adopt the suggestion to add an
anti-abuse rule. The IRS and Treasury Department have concluded that
the bright-line rule in the proposed regulations for determining when
issuers must apply a combined measurement period and when issuers may
apply either a combined measurement period or a separate measurement
period is an appropriate methodology for measuring the private business
use of a refunding issue and provides more administrative certainty
than would be provided by an anti-abuse rule.
[[Page 75030]]
Commentators expressed concern regarding an issuer's ability to
establish the amount of private business use during a combined
measurement period if the period begins a significant amount of time
before the refunding bonds are issued. They noted that, in some cases,
the refunded bonds may have been issued as many as twenty years or more
before the refunding bonds are issued. These commentators stated that
document retention policies vary by issuer and retaining or locating
the necessary information over such long periods of time may be
difficult.
The final regulations apply prospectively and only to refunding
bonds that are subject to the 1997 regulations. In general, under Sec.
1.141-15, the 1997 regulations apply to refunding bonds only if, among
other requirements, (1) the refunded bonds were originally issued on or
after May 16, 1997, (2) the weighted average maturity of the refunding
bonds is longer than the weighted average maturity of the refunded
bonds, or (3) the issuer chooses to apply the 1997 regulations to the
refunding bonds. Thus, the final regulations will not apply to any
refunding of bonds originally issued before May 16, 1997, unless the
issuer extends the weighted average maturity of the prior bonds or
otherwise chooses to have the 1997 regulations apply to the refunding
bonds (or an earlier issue of bonds).
In addition, to address commentators' concerns, the final
regulations provide transitional relief for refundings of bonds
originally issued before May 16, 1997 (the effective date of the 1997
regulations). Specifically, the final regulations provide that, if the
prior issue (or, in the case of a series of refundings of governmental
bonds, the first issue of governmental bonds in the series) was issued
before May 16, 1997, then the issuer, at its option, may treat the
combined measurement period as beginning on the date (the transition
date) that is the earlier of (1) December 19, 2005 or (2) the first
date on which the prior issue (or an earlier issue in the case of a
series of refundings of governmental bonds) became subject to the 1997
regulations. This transitional relief, which was not contained in the
proposed regulations, has been added to the final regulations in
response to concerns expressed by commentators regarding an issuer's
ability to establish the amount of private business use during a
combined measurement period if the period begins a significant amount
of time before the refunding bonds are issued.
Some commentators requested guidance on how the private business
tests apply to the shortened and combined measurement periods for
refundings of bonds originally issued before the effective date of the
Tax Reform Act of 1986, 100 Stat. 2085 (the 1986 Act), if the refunding
does not qualify for transitional relief under the 1986 Act or prior
law. Specifically, commentators requested guidance on whether (1) the
ten-percent private business use limitation under the 1986 Act or (2)
the applicable private business use limitation under prior law (for
example, the 25-percent limitation under the Internal Revenue Code of
1954) applies in the case of a non-transitioned refunding of a bond
issued under law in effect prior to the 1986 Act. The final regulations
clarify in an example that the 1986 Act limitations apply to the
shortened and combined measurement periods. The issuer, however, may
treat these periods as beginning on the transition date described
above.
4. Measurement of private security and private payments. Under the
proposed regulations, if the amount of private business use is
determined based on the separate measurement period for the refunding
issue, then the amount of private security and private payments
allocable to the refunding issue is determined under Sec. 1.141-4 by
treating the refunding issue as a separate issue. On the other hand, if
the amount of private business use is determined based on a combined
measurement period, then the amount of private security and private
payments allocable to the refunding issue is determined under Sec.
1.141-4 by treating the refunding issue and all earlier issues taken
into account in determining the combined measurement period as a
combined issue. The proposed regulations contain specific rules for
determining the present value of the debt service on, and the private
security and private payments allocable to, a combined issue.
Commentators requested clarification regarding how the private
security or payment test applies under the combined issue methodology
in the case of a refunding of only a portion of the original principal
amount of a prior issue. The final regulations clarify that, in these
circumstances, (1) the refunded portion of the prior issue is treated
as a separate issue and (2) any private security or private payments
with respect to the prior issue are allocated ratably between the
combined issue and the unrefunded portion of the prior issue in a
consistent manner based on relative debt service.
The proposed regulations also permit an issuer to use the yield on
a prior issue of governmental bonds to determine the present value of
private security or private payments under arrangements that were not
entered into in contemplation of the refunding issue. For this purpose,
any arrangement that was entered into more than one year before the
issue date of the refunding issue will be treated as not entered into
in contemplation of the refunding issue.
Comments were not received on this special rule for arrangements
not entered into in contemplation of the refunding issue. The final
regulations retain this provision.
5. Multipurpose issue allocations. Section 1.148-9(h) permits an
issuer to use a reasonable, consistently applied allocation method to
treat the portion of a multipurpose issue allocable to a separate
purpose as a separate issue for certain of the arbitrage provisions of
section 148. Section 1.141-13(d) of the proposed regulations allows an
issuer to apply Sec. 1.148-9(h) to a multipurpose issue for certain
purposes under section 141. An allocation will not be reasonable for
this purpose if it achieves more favorable results under section 141
than could be achieved with actual separate issues. In addition,
allocations under the proposed regulations and Sec. 1.148-9(h) must be
consistent for purposes of sections 141 and 148. The proposed
regulations do not permit allocations for purposes of section 141(c)(1)
(relating to the private loan financing test) or section 141(d)(1)
(relating to certain restrictions on acquiring nongovernmental output
property).
Commentators supported the multipurpose allocation provisions in
the proposed regulations. The final regulations retain those
provisions. Commentators also requested clarification that an
allocation under Sec. 1.141-13(d) may be made at any time. The final
regulations provide that an allocation under Sec. 1.141-13(d) may be
made at any time, but once made may not be changed. The final
regulations also provide that the issue to be allocated and each of the
separate issues under the allocation must consist of one or more tax-
exempt bonds. Thus, an allocation of a multipurpose issue into two or
more separate issues is not permitted under Sec. 1.141-13(d) if, at
the time of the allocation, the issue to be allocated or any of the
separate issues under the allocation consists of taxable private
activity bonds.
6. Application of reasonable expectations test to certain refunding
bonds. Section 1.141-2(d) provides that an issue consists of private
activity bonds if the issuer (1) reasonably expects, as of the issue
date, that the
[[Page 75031]]
issue will meet either the private business tests or the private loan
financing test, or (2) takes a deliberate action, subsequent to the
issue date, that causes the conditions of either the private business
tests or the private loan financing test to be satisfied. Section
1.141-2(d)(3) provides, in general, that a deliberate action is any
action taken by the issuer that is within its control.
The proposed regulations provide that an action that would
otherwise cause a refunding issue to satisfy the private business tests
or the private loan financing test is not taken into account under the
reasonable expectations test of Sec. 1.141-2(d) if (1) the action is
not a deliberate action within the meaning of Sec. 1.141-2(d)(3), and
(2) the weighted average maturity of the refunding bonds is not greater
than the remaining weighted average maturity of the prior bonds.
Commentators suggested that the limitation on the weighted average
maturity of the refunding bonds to the remaining weighted average
maturity of the prior bonds could penalize issuers for issuing shorter-
term obligations initially, or provide an incentive to issue longer-
term obligations initially. These commentators requested that the
weighted average maturity of the refunding bonds be limited only to 120
percent of the weighted average reasonably expected economic life of
the property financed by the prior bonds. The final regulations amend
this provision to provide that the weighted average maturity of the
refunding bonds may not exceed the weighted average reasonably expected
economic life of the property financed by the prior bonds.
Commentators also requested that an example illustrating this
provision be added to the regulations. The final regulations add such
an example.
7. Refundings of certain general obligation bonds. Section 1.141-
2(d)(5) provides that the determination of whether bonds of an issue
are private activity bonds may be based solely on the issuer's
reasonable expectations as of the issue date (and not on whether there
are any subsequent deliberate actions) if, among other requirements,
the issue is an issue of general obligation bonds of a general purpose
governmental unit that finances at least 25 separate purposes.
Commentators suggested that a refunding issue should not consist of
private activity bonds if the prior issue meets the requirements of
Sec. 1.141-2(d)(5). The final regulations adopt this comment.
C. Treatment of Issuance Costs Financed by Prior Issue of Qualified
501(c)(3) Bonds
Under the 1997 regulations, the use of proceeds of an issue of
qualified 501(c)(3) bonds to pay issuance costs of the issue is treated
as a private business use. The proposed regulations provide that,
solely for purposes of applying the private business use test to a
refunding issue, the use of proceeds of the prior issue (or any earlier
issue in a series of refundings) to pay issuance costs of the prior
issue (or the earlier issue) is treated as a government use.
Comments were not received on this provision. The final regulations
retain this rule.
D. Limitation on Advance Refundings of Private Activity Bonds
Under section 149(d)(2), interest on a bond is not excluded from
gross income if any portion of the issue of which the bond is a part is
issued to advance refund a private activity bond (other than a
qualified 501(c)(3) bond). The proposed regulations provide that, for
purposes of section 149(d)(2), the term private activity bond includes
a qualified bond described in section 141(e) (other than a qualified
501(c)(3) bond), regardless of whether the refunding issue consists of
private activity bonds under the proposed regulations. The proposed
regulations also provide that, for purposes of section 149(d)(2), the
term private activity bond does not include a taxable bond. Section
1.150-1(b) defines taxable bond as any obligation the interest on which
is not excludable from gross income under section 103.
Commentators recommended that the regulations be modified to permit
a tax-exempt private activity bond to be advance refunded by a
governmental bond if the nongovernmental entity's participation in the
financing has been terminated and the only beneficiary of the financing
is the governmental unit. Based on the plain language of section
149(d)(2) and the policies underlying that Code provision, the final
regulations do not adopt this comment.
Effective Date
The final regulations apply to bonds that are (1) sold on or after
February 17, 2006 and (2) subject to the 1997 regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because the
regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Johanna Som de Cerff
and Laura W. Lederman, Office of Chief Counsel (Tax-exempt and
Government Entities), Internal Revenue Service and Stephen J. Watson,
Office of Tax Legislative Counsel, Department of the Treasury. However,
other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read, in
part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.141-0 is amended by adding entries to the table in
numerical order for Sec. Sec. 1.141-13 and 1.141-15(j) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.141-0 Table of contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.141-13 Refunding issues.
(a) In general.
(b) Application of private business use test and private loan
financing test.
(1) Allocation of proceeds.
(2) Determination of amount of private business use.
(c) Application of private security or payment test.
(1) Separate issue treatment.
(2) Combined issue treatment.
(3) Special rule for arrangements not entered into in
contemplation of the refunding issue.
(d) Multipurpose issue allocations.
(1) In general.
(2) Exceptions.
(e) Application of reasonable expectations test to certain
refunding bonds.
(f) Special rule for refundings of certain general obligation
bonds.
(g) Examples.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.141-15 Effective dates.
* * * * *
(j) Effective dates for certain regulations relating to
refundings.
* * * * *
[[Page 75032]]
0
Par. 3. In Sec. 1.141-1, paragraph (b) is amended by revising the
definition of governmental bond to read as follows:
Sec. 1.141-1 Definitions and rules of general application.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Governmental bond has the same meaning as in Sec. 1.150-1(b),
except that, for purposes of Sec. 1.141-13, governmental bond is
defined in Sec. 1.141-13(b)(2)(iv).
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.141-13 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.141-13 Refunding issues.
(a) In general. Except as provided in this section, a refunding
issue and a prior issue are tested separately under section 141. Thus,
the determination of whether a refunding issue consists of private
activity bonds generally does not depend on whether the prior issue
consists of private activity bonds.
(b) Application of private business use test and private loan
financing test--(1) Allocation of proceeds. In applying the private
business use test and the private loan financing test to a refunding
issue, the proceeds of the refunding issue are allocated to the same
expenditures and purpose investments as the proceeds of the prior
issue.
(2) Determination of amount of private business use--(i) In
general. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section,
the amount of private business use of a refunding issue is determined
under Sec. 1.141-3(g), based on the measurement period for that issue
(for example, without regard to any private business use that occurred
prior to the issue date of the refunding issue).
(ii) Refundings of governmental bonds. In applying the private
business use test to a refunding issue that refunds a prior issue of
governmental bonds, the amount of private business use of the refunding
issue is the amount of private business use--
(A) During the combined measurement period; or
(B) At the option of the issuer, during the period described in
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, but only if, without regard to the
reasonable expectations test of Sec. 1.141-2(d), the prior issue does
not satisfy the private business use test, based on a measurement
period that begins on the first day of the combined measurement period
and ends on the issue date of the refunding issue.
(iii) Combined measurement period--(A) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, the combined
measurement period is the period that begins on the first day of the
measurement period (as defined in Sec. 1.141-3(g)) for the prior issue
(or, in the case of a series of refundings of governmental bonds, the
first issue of governmental bonds in the series) and ends on the last
day of the measurement period for the refunding issue.
(B) Transition rule for refundings of bonds originally issued
before May 16, 1997. If the prior issue (or, in the case of a series of
refundings of governmental bonds, the first issue of governmental bonds
in the series) was issued before May 16, 1997, then the issuer, at its
option, may treat the combined measurement period as beginning on the
date (the transition date) that is the earlier of December 19, 2005 or
the first date on which the prior issue (or an earlier issue in the
case of a series of refundings of governmental bonds) became subject to
the 1997 regulations (as defined in Sec. 1.141-15(b)). If the issuer
treats the combined measurement period as beginning on the transition
date in accordance with this paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B), then paragraph
(c)(2) of this section shall be applied by treating the transition date
as the issue date of the earliest issue, by treating the bonds as
reissued on the transition date at an issue price equal to the value of
the bonds (as determined under Sec. 1.148-4(e)) on that date, and by
disregarding any private security or private payments before the
transition date.
(iv) Governmental bond. For purposes of this section, the term
governmental bond means any bond that, when issued, purported to be a
governmental bond, as defined in Sec. 1.150-1(b), or a qualified
501(c)(3) bond, as defined in section 145(a).
(v) Special rule for refundings of qualified 501(c)(3) bonds with
governmental bonds. For purposes of applying this paragraph (b)(2) to a
refunding issue that refunds a qualified 501(c)(3) bond, any use of the
property refinanced by the refunding issue before the issue date of the
refunding issue by a 501(c)(3) organization with respect to its
activities that do not constitute an unrelated trade or business under
section 513(a) is treated as government use.
(c) Application of private security or payment test--(1) Separate
issue treatment. If the amount of private business use of a refunding
issue is determined based on the measurement period for that issue in
accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(i) or (b)(2)(ii)(B) of this section,
then the amount of private security and private payments allocable to
the refunding issue is determined under Sec. 1.141-4 by treating the
refunding issue as a separate issue.
(2) Combined issue treatment. If the amount of private business use
of a refunding issue is determined based on the combined measurement
period for that issue in accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) of
this section, then the amount of private security and private payments
allocable to the refunding issue is determined under Sec. 1.141-4 by
treating the refunding issue and all earlier issues taken into account
in determining the combined measurement period as a combined issue. For
this purpose, the present value of the private security and private
payments is compared to the present value of the debt service on the
combined issue (other than debt service paid with proceeds of any
refunding bond). Present values are computed as of the issue date of
the earliest issue taken into account in determining the combined
measurement period (the earliest issue). Except as provided in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, present values are determined by
using the yield on the combined issue as the discount rate. The yield
on the combined issue is determined by taking into account payments on
the refunding issue and all earlier issues taken into account in
determining the combined measurement period (other than payments made
with proceeds of any refunding bond), and based on the issue price of
the earliest issue. In the case of a refunding of only a portion of the
original principal amount of a prior issue, the refunded portion of the
prior issue is treated as a separate issue and any private security or
private payments with respect to the prior issue are allocated ratably
between the combined issue and the unrefunded portion of the prior
issue in a consistent manner based on relative debt service. See
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this section for special rules relating to
certain refundings of governmental bonds originally issued before May
16, 1997.
(3) Special rule for arrangements not entered into in contemplation
of the refunding issue. In applying the private security or payment
test to a refunding issue that refunds a prior issue of governmental
bonds, the issuer may use the yield on the prior issue to determine the
present value of private security and private payments under
arrangements that were not entered into in contemplation of the
refunding issue. For this purpose, any arrangement that was entered
into more than 1 year before the issue date of the refunding issue is
treated as not entered into in contemplation of the refunding issue.
[[Page 75033]]
(d) Multipurpose issue allocations--(1) In general. For purposes of
section 141, unless the context clearly requires otherwise, Sec.
1.148-9(h) applies to allocations of multipurpose issues (as defined in
Sec. 1.148-1(b)), including allocations involving the refunding
purposes of the issue. An allocation under this paragraph (d) may be
made at any time, but once made may not be changed. An allocation is
not reasonable under this paragraph (d) if it achieves more favorable
results under section 141 than could be achieved with actual separate
issues. The issue to be allocated and each of the separate issues under
the allocation must consist of one or more tax-exempt bonds.
Allocations made under this paragraph (d) and Sec. 1.148-9(h) must be
consistent for purposes of section 141 and section 148.
(2) Exceptions. This paragraph (d) does not apply for purposes of
sections 141(c)(1) and 141(d)(1).
(e) Application of reasonable expectations test to certain
refunding bonds. An action that would otherwise cause a refunding issue
to satisfy the private business tests or the private loan financing
test is not taken into account under the reasonable expectations test
of Sec. 1.141-2(d) if--
(1) The action is not a deliberate action within the meaning of
Sec. 1.141-2(d)(3); and
(2) The weighted average maturity of the refunding bonds is not
greater than the weighted average reasonably expected economic life of
the property financed by the prior bonds.
(f) Special rule for refundings of certain general obligation
bonds. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a refunding
issue does not consist of private activity bonds if--
(1) The prior issue meets the requirements of Sec. 1.141-2(d)(5)
(relating to certain general obligation bond programs that finance a
large number of separate purposes); or
(2) The refunded portion of the prior issue is part of a series of
refundings of all or a portion of an issue that meets the requirements
of Sec. 1.141-2(d)(5).
(g) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of
this section:
Example 1. Measuring private business use. In 2002, Authority A
issues tax-exempt bonds that mature in 2032 to acquire an office
building. The measurement period for the 2002 bonds under Sec.
1.141-3(g) is 30 years. At the time A acquires the building, it
enters into a 10-year lease with a nongovernmental person under
which the nongovernmental person will use 5 percent of the building
in its trade or business during each year of the lease term. In
2007, A issues bonds to refund the 2002 bonds. The 2007 bonds mature
on the same date as the 2002 bonds and have a measurement period of
25 years under Sec. 1.141-3(g). Under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) of
this section, the amount of private business use of the proceeds of
the 2007 bonds is 1.67 percent, which equals the amount of private
business use during the combined measurement period (5 percent of
\1/3\ of the 30-year combined measurement period). In addition, the
2002 bonds do not satisfy the private business use test, based on a
measurement period beginning on the first day of the measurement
period for the 2002 bonds and ending on the issue date of the 2007
bonds, because only 5 percent of the proceeds of the 2002 bonds are
used for a private business use during that period. Thus, under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, A may treat the amount of
private business use of the 2007 bonds as 1 percent (5 percent of
\1/5\ of the 25-year measurement period for the 2007 bonds). The
2007 bonds do not satisfy the private business use test.
Example 2. Combined issue yield computation. (i) On January 1,
2000, County B issues 20-year bonds to finance the acquisition of a
municipal auditorium. The 2000 bonds have a yield of 7.7500 percent,
compounded annually, and an issue price and par amount of $100
million. The debt service payments on the 2000 bonds are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Debt service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/01............................................... $9,996,470
1/1/02............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/03............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/04............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/05............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/06............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/07............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/08............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/09............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/10............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/11............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/12............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/13............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/14............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/15............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/16............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/17............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/18............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/19............................................... 9,996,470
1/1/20............................................... 9,996,470
------------------
199,929,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) On January 1, 2005, B issues 15-year bonds to refund all of
the outstanding 2000 bonds maturing after January 1, 2005 (in the
aggregate principal amount of $86,500,000). The 2005 bonds have a
yield of 6.0000 percent, compounded annually, and an issue price and
par amount of $89,500,000. The debt service payments on the 2005
bonds are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Debt service
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/06............................................... $9,215,167
1/1/07............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/08............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/09............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/10............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/11............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/12............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/13............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/14............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/15............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/16............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/17............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/18............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/19............................................... 9,215,167
1/1/20............................................... 9,215,167
------------------
138,227,511
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) In accordance with Sec. 1.141-15(h), B chooses to apply
Sec. 1.141-13 (together with the other provisions set forth in
Sec. 1.141-15(h)), to the 2005 bonds. For purposes of determining
the amount of private security and private payments with respect to
the 2005 bonds, the 2005 bonds and the refunded portion of the 2000
bonds are treated as a combined issue under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section. The yield on the combined issue is determined in accordance
with Sec. Sec. 1.148-4, 1.141-4(b)(2)(iii) and 1.141-13(c)(2).
Under this methodology, the yield on the combined issue is 7.1062
percent per year compounded annually, illustrated as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous debt
service on
Date refunded Refunding debt Total debt Present value on
portion of service service 1/1/00
prior issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/00.................................... .............. .............. ................. ($86,500,000.00)
1/1/01.................................... 6,689,793 .............. 6,689,793 6,245,945.33
1/1/02.................................... 6,689,793 .............. 6,689,793 5,831,545.62
1/1/03.................................... 6,689,793 .............. 6,689,793 5,444,640.09
1/1/04.................................... 6,689,793 .............. 6,689,793 5,083,404.58
1/1/05.................................... 6,689,793 .............. 6,689,793 4,746,135.95
1/1/06.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 6,104,023.84
1/1/07.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 5,699,040.20
1/1/08.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 5,320,926.00
1/1/09.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 4,967,898.55
[[Page 75034]]
1/1/10.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 4,638,293.40
1/1/11.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 4,330,556.57
1/1/12.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 4,043,237.15
1/1/13.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 3,774,980.51
1/1/14.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 3,524,521.90
1/1/15.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 3,290,680.46
1/1/16.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 3,072,353.70
1/1/17.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 2,868,512.26
1/1/18.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 2,678,195.09
1/1/19.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 2,500,504.89
1/1/20.................................... .............. 9,215,167 9,215,167 2,334,603.90
-----------------
33,448,965 138,227,511 171,676,4760.00 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 3. Determination of private payments allocable to
combined issue. The facts are the same as in Example 2. In addition,
on January 1, 2001, B enters into a contract with a nongovernmental
person for the use of the auditorium. The contract results in a
private payment in the amount of $500,000 on each January 1
beginning on January 1, 2001, and ending on January 1, 2020. Under
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the amount of the private payments
allocable to the combined issue is determined by treating the
refunded portion of the 2000 bonds ($86,500,000 principal amount) as
a separate issue, and by allocating the total private payments
ratably between the combined issue and the unrefunded portion of the
2000 bonds ($13,500,000 principal amount) based on relative debt
service, as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage Amount of
Debt of private private
Private service on Debt service on payments payments
Date payments unrefunded combined issue allocable allocable
portion of to combined to combined
prior issue issue issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/01................................... $500,000 $3,306,677 $6,689,793 66.92 $334,608
1/1/02................................... 500,000 3,306,677 6,689,793 66.92 334,608
1/1/03................................... 500,000 3,306,677 6,689,793 66.92 334,608
1/1/04................................... 500,000 3,306,677 6,689,793 66.92 334,608
1/1/05................................... 500,000 3,306,677 6,689,793 66.92 334,608
1/1/06................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/07................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/08................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/09................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/10................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/11................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/12................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/13................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/14................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/15................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/16................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/17................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/18................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/19................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
1/1/20................................... 500,000 ........... 9,215,167 100.00 500,000
--------------
$10,000,000 $16,533,385 $171,676,476 ........... $9,173,039
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 4. Refunding taxable bonds and qualified bonds. (i) In
1999, City C issues taxable bonds to finance the construction of a
facility for the furnishing of water. The bonds are secured by
revenues from the facility. The facility is managed pursuant to a
management contract with a nongovernmental person that gives rise to
private business use. In 2007, C terminates the management contract
and takes over the operation of the facility. In 2009, C issues
bonds to refund the 1999 bonds. On the issue date of the 2009 bonds,
C reasonably expects that the facility will not be used for a
private business use during the term of the 2009 bonds. In addition,
during the term of the 2009 bonds, the facility is not used for a
private business use. Under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, the
2009 bonds do not satisfy the private business use test because the
amount of private business use is based on the measurement period
for those bonds and therefore does not take into account any private
business use that occurred pursuant to the management contract.
(ii) The facts are the same as in paragraph (i) of this Example
4, except that the 1999 bonds are issued as exempt facility bonds
under section 142(a)(4). The 2009 bonds do not satisfy the private
business use test.
Example 5. Multipurpose issue. In 2001, State D issues bonds to
finance the construction of two office buildings, Building 1 and
Building 2. D expends an equal amount of the proceeds on each
building. D enters into arrangements that result in 8 percent of
Building 1 and 12 percent of Building 2 being used for a private
business use during the measurement period under Sec. 1.141-3(g).
These arrangements result in a total of 10 percent of the proceeds
of the 2001 bonds being used for a private business use. In 2006, D
purports to allocate, under paragraph (d) of this section, an equal
amount of the outstanding 2001 bonds to Building 1 and Building 2. D
also enters into another private business use arrangement with
respect to Building 1 that results in an additional 2
[[Page 75035]]
percent (and a total of 10 percent) of Building 1 being used for a
private business use during the measurement period. An allocation is
not reasonable under paragraph (d) of this section if it achieves
more favorable results under section 141 than could be achieved with
actual separate issues. D's allocation is unreasonable because, if
permitted, it would result in more than 10 percent of the proceeds
of the 2001 bonds being used for a private business use.
Example 6. Non-deliberate action. In 1998, City E issues bonds
to finance the purchase of land and construction of a building (the
prior bonds). On the issue date of the prior bonds, E reasonably
expects that it will be the sole user of the financed property for
the entire term of the bonds. In 2003, the federal government
acquires the financed property in a condemnation action. In 2006, E
issues bonds to refund the prior bonds (the refunding bonds). The
weighted average maturity of the refunding bonds is not greater than
the reasonably expected economic life of the financed property. In
general, under Sec. 1.141-2(d) and this section, reasonable
expectations must be separately tested on the issue date of a
refunding issue. Under paragraph (e) of this section, however, the
condemnation action is not taken into account in applying the
reasonable expectations test to the refunding bonds because the
condemnation action is not a deliberate action within the meaning of
Sec. 1.141-2(d)(3) and the weighted average maturity of the
refunding bonds is not greater than the weighted average reasonably
expected economic life of the property financed by the prior bonds.
Thus, the condemnation action does not cause the refunding bonds to
be private activity bonds.
Example 7. Non-transitioned refunding of bonds subject to 1954
Code.
In 1985, County F issues bonds to finance a court house. The
1985 bonds are subject to the provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954. In 2006, F issues bonds to refund all of the
outstanding 1985 bonds. The weighted average maturity of the 2006
bonds is longer than the remaining weighted average maturity of the
1985 bonds. In addition, the 2006 bonds do not satisfy any
transitional rule for refundings in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, 100
Stat. 2085 (1986). Section 141 and this section apply to determine
whether the 2006 bonds are private activity bonds including whether,
for purposes of Sec. 1.141-13(b)(2)(ii)(B), the 1985 bonds satisfy
the private business use test based on a measurement period that
begins on the first day of the combined measurement period for the
2006 bonds and ends on the issue date of the 2006 bonds.
0
Par. 5. Section 1.141-15 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (c),
(d) and (h) and adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.141-15 Effective dates.
* * * * *
(b) Effective dates--(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided
in this section, Sec. Sec. 1.141-0 through 1.141-6(a), 1.141-9 through
1.141-12, 1.141-14, 1.145-1 through 1.145-2(c), and the definition of
bond documents contained in Sec. 1.150-1(b) (the 1997 regulations)
apply to bonds issued on or after May 16, 1997, that are subject to
section 1301 of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 2602).
* * * * *
(c) Refunding bonds. Except as otherwise provided in this section,
the 1997 regulations (defined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section) do
not apply to any bonds issued on or after May 16, 1997, to refund a
bond to which those regulations do not apply unless--
(1) The refunding bonds are subject to section 1301 of the Tax
Reform Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 2602); and
(2)(i) The weighted average maturity of the refunding bonds is
longer than--
(A) The weighted average maturity of the refunded bonds; or
(B) In the case of a short-term obligation that the issuer
reasonably expects to refund with a long-term financing (such as a bond
anticipation note), 120 percent of the weighted average reasonably
expected economic life of the facilities financed; or
(ii) A principal purpose for the issuance of the refunding bonds is
to make one or more new conduit loans.
(d) Permissive application of regulations. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, the 1997 regulations (defined in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section) may be applied in whole, but not in
part, to actions taken before February 23, 1998, with respect to--
(1) Bonds that are outstanding on May 16, 1997, and subject to
section 141; or
(2) Refunding bonds issued on or after May 16, 1997, that are
subject to 141.
* * * * *
(h) Permissive retroactive application. Except as provided in
paragraphs (d), (e) or (i) of this section, Sec. Sec. 1.141-1 through
1.141-6(a), 1.141-7 through 1.141-14, 1.145-1 through 1.145-2,
1.149(d)-1(g), 1.150-1(a)(3), the definition of bond documents
contained in Sec. 1.150-1(b) and Sec. 1.150-1(c)(3)(ii) may be
applied by issuers in whole, but not in part, to--
(1) Outstanding bonds that are sold before February 17, 2006, and
subject to section 141; or
(2) Refunding bonds that are sold on or after February 17, 2006,
and subject to section 141.
* * * * *
(j) Effective dates for certain regulations relating to refundings.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, Sec. Sec. 1.141-13,
1.145-2(d), 1.149(d)-1(g), 1.150-1(a)(3) and 1.150-1(c)(3)(ii) apply to
bonds that are sold on or after February 17, 2006 and that are subject
to the 1997 regulations.
0
Par. 6. Section 1.145-0 is amended by adding an entry to the table in
numerical order for Sec. 1.145-2(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.145-0 Table of contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.145-2 Application of private activity bond regulations.
* * * * *
(d) Issuance costs financed by prior issue.
0
Par. 7. In Sec. 1.145-2, paragraph (d) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.145-2 Application of private activity bond regulations.
* * * * *
(d) Issuance costs financed by prior issue. Solely for purposes of
applying the private business use test to a refunding issue under Sec.
1.141-13, the use of proceeds of the prior issue (or any earlier issue
in a series of refundings) to pay issuance costs of the prior issue (or
the earlier issue) is treated as a government use.
0
Par. 8. Section 1.149(d)-1 is amended by revising paragraph (g) and
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.149(d)-1 Limitations on advance refundings.
* * * * *
(g) Limitation on advance refundings of private activity bonds.
Under section 149(d)(2) and this section, interest on a bond is not
excluded from gross income if any portion of the issue of which the
bond is a part is issued to advance refund a private activity bond
(other than a qualified 501(c)(3) bond). For this purpose, the term
private activity bond--
(1) Includes a qualified bond described in section 141(e) (other
than a qualified 501(c)(3) bond), regardless of whether the refunding
issue consists of private activity bonds under Sec. 1.141-13; and
(2) Does not include a taxable bond.
(h) Effective dates--(1) In general. Except as provided in this
paragraph (h), this section applies to bonds issued after June 30,
1993, to which Sec. Sec. 1.148-1 through 1.148-11 apply, including
conduit loans that are treated as issued after June 30, 1993, under
paragraph (b)(4) of this section. In addition, this section applies to
any issue to which the election described in Sec. 1.148-11(b)(1) is
made.
(2) Special effective date for paragraph (b)(3). Paragraph (b)(3)
of this
[[Page 75036]]
section applies to any advance refunding issue issued after May 28,
1991.
(3) Special effective date for paragraph (f)(3). Paragraph (f)(3)
of this section applies to bonds sold on or after July 8, 1997 and to
any issue to which the election described in Sec. 1.148-11(b)(1) is
made. See Sec. 1.148-11A(i) for rules relating to certain bonds sold
before July 8, 1997.
(4) Special effective date for paragraph (g). See Sec. 1.141-15
for the applicability date of paragraph (g) of this section.
0
Par 9. Section 1.150-1 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and
(c)(3)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.150-1 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(3) Exceptions to general effective date. See Sec. 1.141-15 for
the applicability date of the definition of bond documents contained in
paragraph (b) of this section and the effective date of paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) of this section.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Exceptions. This paragraph (c)(3) does not apply for purposes
of sections 141, 144(a), 148, 149(d) and 149(g).
* * * * *
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: November 23, 2005.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 05-23944 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P