FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting, 74810-74814 [05-24139]
Download as PDF
74810
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
Proposed Revised Land Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Several Counties, AR; and LeFlore
and McCurtain Counties, OK.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050466, ERP No. F–COE–
C39018–NJ, Liberty State Park
Ecosystem Restoration Project,
Hudson Raritan Estuary Study, To
Address the Adverse Impacts
Associated with Past Filling
Activities, Port Authority of New and
New Jersey City, Hudson County, NJ.
Summary: No formal comment letter
sent to preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050467, ERP No. F–COE–
C39017–NY, Montuak Point Storm
Damage Reduction Project, Proposed
Reinforcement of an Existing Stone
Revetment Wall, Suffolk County, NY.
Summary: No comment letter was
sent was sent to the proposing agency.
EIS No. 20050477, ERP No. F–COE–
K36141–AZ, Santa Cruz River, Paseo
de las Iglesias Feasibility Study, To
Identify, Define and Solve
Environmental Degradation, Flooding
and Water Resource Problems, City of
Tucson, Pima County, AZ.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20050352, ERP No. FS–NPS–
L65264–WA, Elwha River Ecosystem
Restoration Implementation Project,
Updated Information, Olympic
Peninsula, Challam County, WA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: December 13, 2005.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E5–7444 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6670–3]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed December 5, 2005 Through
December 9, 2005
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20050515, Draft EIS, NPS, FL,
Fort King National Historic
Landmark, Special Resource Study,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:37 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
Implementation, Second Seminole
War Site, City of Ocala, Marion
County, FL, Comment Period Ends:
January 30, 2006, Contact: Tim
Bemisderfer 404–562–3124.
EIS No. 20050516, Draft Supplement,
DOI, 00, Upper Mississippi River
National Wildlife and Fish Refuge,
Comprehensive Conservation Plan, A
New Alternative E: Modified Wildlife
and Integrated Public Use,
Implementation, MN, WI, IL and IA,
Comment Period Ends: February 3,
2005, Contact: Don Hultman 507–
452–4232. This document is available
on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/planning/uppermiss/
index.html.
EIS No. 20050517, Final EIS, FHW, PA,
US–219 Improvements Project,
Meyersdale to Somerset, SR 6219,
Section 020, Funding, U.S. Army COE
Section 404 Permit, Somerset County,
PA, Wait Period Ends: January 23,
2006, Contact: James A. Cheatham
717–221–3461.
EIS No. 20050518, Draft EIS, BLM, WY,
Atlantic Rim Natural Gas Field
Development Project, Proposed
Natural Gas Development to 2000
Wells, 1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to
Other Formations, Carbon County,
WY, Comment Period Ends: January
30, 2006, Contact: David Simons 307–
328–4328
EIS No. 20050519, Final EIS, FHW, RI,
U.S. Route 6/Route 10 Interchange
Improvement Project, To Identify
Transportation Alternative, Funding,
City of Providence County, RI, Wait
Period Ends: January 17, 2006,
Contact: Ralph Rizzo 401–528–4548.
EIS No. 20050520, Draft EIS, BIA, OR,
Coyote Business Park, Confederated
Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation, Proposes to Develop,
Build and Manage a Light Industrial
Commercial Business Park, Umatilla
County, OR, Comment Period Ends:
January 30, 2006, Contact: Jerry L.
Lauer 541–278–3786.
EIS No. 20050521, Draft EIS, BLM, AZ,
Arizona Strip Field Office Resource
Management Plan, which includes:
Vermilion Cliffs National Monument,
Grand Canyon-Parashant National
Monument (Parashant) BLM Portion,
General Management Plan for the
Grand Canyon-Parashant National
Monument NPS Portion of Parashant,
Implementation, AZ, Comment Period
Ends: January 30, 2006, Contact:
Diana Hawks 435–688–3266.
EIS No. 20050522, Final EIS, NPS, TX,
Big Thicket National Preserve Oil and
Gas Management Plan,
Implementation, Hardin, Jefferson,
Orange, Liberty, Tyler, Jasper and
Polk Counties, TX, Wait Period Ends:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
January 17, 2006, Contact: Linda
Dansby 505–988–6095.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20050411, Draft EIS, IBR, CA,
Central Valley Project, West San
Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit LongTerm Water Service Contract
Renewal, Cities of Avenal, Coalinga
and Huron, Fresno, King and Merced
Counties, CA, Comment Period Ends:
January 17, 2006, Contact: Shane
Hunt, 559–487–5138 Revision to FR
Notice Published October 7, 2005:
Comment Period Extend from
November 25, 2005 to January 17,
2006.
Dated: December 13, 2005.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E5–7446 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471; FRL–7753–1]
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel;
Notice of Public Meeting
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: There will be a 3–day meeting
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory
Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider the
Review of Worker Exposure Assessment
Methods.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
February 14–16, 2006, from 8:30 a.m. to
approximately 5:00 p.m. eastern time.
Comments. For the deadlines for the
submission of requests to present oral
comments and submission of written
comments, see Unit I.E. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Nominations. Nominations of
scientific experts to serve as ad hoc
members of the FIFRA SAP for this
meeting should be provided on or before
December 28, 2005.
Special accommodations. For
information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to
request accommodation of a disability,
please contact the Designated Federal
Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably at least
10– days prior to the meeting, to give
EPA as much time as possible to process
your request.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
[the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge,
1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington,
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
VA 22209. The telephone number for
the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge
is (703) 807–2000.
Comments. Written comments may be
submitted electronically preferred,
through hand delivery/courier, or by
mail. Follow the detailed instructions as
provided in Unit I. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Nominations, requests to present oral
comments, and special
accommodations: To submit
nominations for ad hoc members of the
FIFRA SAP for this meeting, requests for
special accommodation arrangements,
or requests to present oral comments,
notify the Designated Federal Official
(DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. To ensure proper
receipt by EPA, your request must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2005–0471 in the subject line on
the first page of your response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy
(7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564–8498; fax number:
(202) 564–8382; e-mail addresses:
christian.myrta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public
in general. This action may, however, be
of interest to persons who are or may be
required to conduct testing of chemical
substances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA). Since other entities
may also be interested, the Agency has
not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this
Document and Other Related
Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an
official public docket for this action
under docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2005–0471. The official public
docket consists of the documents
specifically referenced in this action,
any public comments received, and
other information related to this action.
Although, a part of the official docket,
the public docket does not include
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:37 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
restricted by statute. The official public
docket is the collection of materials that
is available for public viewing at the
Public Information and Records
Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA. This docket facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access
this Federal Register document
electronically under the ‘‘Federal
Register’’ listings at https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
Agency Website. EDOCKET, EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system was replaced on November 25,
2005, by an enhanced federal-wide
electronic docket management and
comment system located at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instruction.
EPA’s position paper, charge/
questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP
composition (i.e., members and
consultants for this meeting) and the
meeting agenda will be available by
mid-January 2006. In addition, the
Agency may provide additional
background documents as the materials
become available. You may obtain
electronic copies of these documents,
and certain other related documents that
might be available electronically, from
the FIFRA SAP Internet Home Page at
https://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available through EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA
Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/
to submit or view public comments,
access the index listing of the contents
of the official public docket, and to
access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically.
Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’
then key in the appropriate docket ID
number.
Certain types of information will not
be placed in the EPA Dockets.
Information claimed as CBI and other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute, which is not
included in the official public docket,
will not be available for public viewing
in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s
policy is that copyrighted material will
not be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly
available docket materials will be made
available in EPA’s electronic public
docket. When a document is selected
from the index list in EPA Dockets, the
system will identify whether the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74811
document is available for viewing in
EPA’s electronic public docket.
Although not all docket materials may
be available electronically, you may still
access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket
facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA
intends to work towards providing
electronic access to all of the publicly
available docket materials through
EPA’s electronic public docket.
For public commenters, it is
important to note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public
viewing in EPA’s electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the
version of the comment that is placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. The
entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on
computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be
transferred to EPA’s electronic public
docket. Public comments in hard copy
that are mailed or delivered to the
docket will be scanned and placed in
EPA’s electronic public docket. Where
practical, physical objects will be
photographed, and the photograph will
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket along with a brief description
written by the docket staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit
Comments?
You may submit comments
electronically (preferred), through hand
delivery/courier, or by mail. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate docket ID number in the
subject line on the first page of your
comment. Please ensure that your
comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments
received after the close of the comment
period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not
required to consider these late
comments. Do not use EPA Dockets or
e-mail to submit CBI or information
protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an
electronic comment as prescribed in this
unit, EPA recommends that you include
your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact
information in the body of your
comment. Also, include this contact
information on the outside of any disk
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
74812
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
or CD ROM you submit, and in any
cover letter accompanying the disk or
CD ROM. This ensures that you can be
identified as the submitter of the
comment and allows EPA to contact you
in case EPA cannot read your comment
due to technical difficulties or needs
further information on the substance of
your comment. EPA’s policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA’s
electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is
EPA’s preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets
at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘search,’’ and then key in
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–
0471. The system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, e-mail address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by
e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2005–0471. In contrast to EPA’s
electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to the docket without going
through EPA’s electronic public docket,
EPA’s e-mail system automatically
captures your e-mail address. E-mail
addresses that are automatically
captured by EPA’s e-mail system are
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit
comments on a disk or CD ROM that
you deliver as described in Unit I.C.2 or
mail to the address provided in Unit
I.C.3. These electronic submissions will
be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
2. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver
your comments to: Public Information
and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB),
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm.
119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St.,
Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471.
Such deliveries are only accepted
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:37 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
during the docket’s normal hours of
operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
3. By mail. Due to potential delays in
EPA’s receipt and processing of mail,
respondents are strongly encouraged to
submit comments either electronically
or by hand delivery or courier. We
cannot guarantee that comments sent
via mail will be received prior to the
close of the comment period. If mailed,
please send your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity
Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001, Attention: Docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471.
D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns.
5. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline in this
document.
6. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
E. How May I Participate in this
Meeting?
You may participate in this meeting
by following the instructions in this
unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
it is imperative that you identify docket
ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471 in
the subject line on the first page of your
request.
1. Oral comments. Oral comments
presented at the meetings should not be
repetitive of previously submitted oral
or written comments. Although requests
to present oral comments are accepted
until the date of the meeting (unless
otherwise stated), to the extent that time
permits, interested persons may be
permitted by the Chair of the FIFRA
SAP to present oral comments at the
meeting. Each individual or group
wishing to make brief oral comments to
the FIFRA SAP is strongly advised to
submit their request to the DFO listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT no later than noon, eastern
time, February 7, 2006, in order to be
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
included on the meeting agenda. The
request should identify the name of the
individual making the presentation, the
organization (if any) the individual will
represent, and any requirements for
audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead
projector, 35 mm projector, chalkboard).
Oral comments before the FIFRA SAP
are limited to approximately 5 minutes
unless prior arrangements have been
made. In addition, each speaker should
bring 30 copies of his or her comments
and presentation slides for distribution
to the FIFRA SAP at the meeting.
2. Written comments. Although,
written comments will be accepted until
the date of the meeting (unless
otherwise stated), the Agency
encourages that written comments be
submitted, using the instructions in
Unit I.C., no later than noon, eastern
time, January 31, 2006, to provide the
FIFRA SAP the time necessary to
consider and review the written
comments. It is requested that persons
submitting comments directly to the
docket also notify the DFO listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
There is no limit on the extent of
written comments for consideration by
the FIFRA SAP.
3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at
the meeting will be on a first-come
basis. Individuals requiring special
accommodations at this meeting,
including wheelchair access and
assistance for the hearing impaired,
should contact the DFO at least 10
business days prior to the meeting using
the information under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT so that
appropriate arrangements can be made.
4. Request for nominations of
prospective candidates for service as ad
hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this
meeting. As part of a broader process for
developing a pool of candidates for each
meeting, the FIFRA SAP staff routinely
solicit the stakeholder community for
nominations of prospective candidates
for service as ad hoc members of the
FIFRA SAP. Any interested person or
organization may nominate qualified
individuals to be considered as
prospective candidates for a specific
meeting. Individuals nominated for this
meeting should have expertise in one or
more of the following areas:
Occupational exposure assessment,
occupational exposure monitoring,
agricultural practices (especially hand
labor practices), statistics, and risk
assessment. Nominees should be
scientists who have sufficient
professional qualifications, including
training and experience, to be capable of
providing expert comments on the
scientific issues for this meeting.
Nominees should be identified by name,
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
occupation, position, address, and
telephone number. Nominations should
be provided to the DFO listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or
before December 28, 2005. The Agency
will consider all nominations of
prospective candidates for this meeting
that are received on or before this date.
However, final selection of ad hoc
members for this meeting is a
discretionary function of the Agency.
The selection of scientists to serve on
the FIFRA SAP is based on the function
of the panel and the expertise needed to
address the Agency’s charge to the
panel. No interested scientists shall be
ineligible to serve by reason of their
membership on any other advisory
committee to a Federal department or
agency or their employment by a
Federal department or agency (except
the EPA). Other factors considered
during the selection process include
availability of the potential panel
member to fully participate in the
panel’s reviews, absence of any conflicts
of interest or appearance of lack of
impartiality, independence with respect
to the matters under review, and lack of
bias. Though, financial conflicts of
interest, the appearance of lack of
impartiality, lack of independence, and
bias may result in disqualification, the
absence of such concerns does not
assure that a candidate will be selected
to serve on the FIFRA SAP. Numerous
qualified candidates are identified for
each panel. Therefore, selection
decisions involve carefully weighing a
number of factors including the
candidates’ areas of expertise and
professional qualifications and
achieving an overall balance of different
scientific perspectives on the panel. In
order to have the collective breadth of
experience needed to address the
Agency’s charge for this meeting, the
Agency anticipates selecting
approximately 12 ad hoc scientists.
If a prospective candidate for service
on the FIFRA SAP is considered for
participation in a particular session, the
candidate is subject to the provisions of
5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, as supplemented
by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As such,
the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to
submit a Confidential Financial
Disclosure Form for Special
Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA Form 3110–48 5–02) which shall
fully disclose, among other financial
interests, the candidate’s employment,
stocks and bonds, and where applicable,
sources of research support. EPA will
evaluate the candidate’s financial
disclosure form to assess that there are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:37 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
no financial conflicts of interest, no
appearance of lack of impartiality and
no prior involvement with the
development of the documents under
consideration (including previous
scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for
service on the FIFRA SAP.
Those who are selected from the pool
of prospective candidates, will be asked
to attend the public meetings, and to
participate in the discussion of key
issues and assumptions at these
meetings. In addition, they will be asked
to review and to help finalize the
meeting minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP
members participating at this meeting
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web
site or may be obtained by contacting
the PIRIB at the address or telephone
number listed in Unit I.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP
Amendments to FIFRA enacted
November 28, 1975 (7 U.S.C. 136w(d)),
include a requirement under section
25(d) of FIFRA that notices of intent to
cancel, or reclassify pesticide
registrations pursuant to section 6(b)(2)
of FIFRA, as well as proposed and final
forms of regulations pursuant to section
25(a) of FIFRA, be submitted to a SAP
prior to being made public or issued to
a registrant. In accordance with section
25(d) of FIFRA, the FIFRA SAP is to
have an opportunity to comment on the
health and environmental impact of
such actions. The FIFRA SAP shall also
make comments, evaluations, and
recommendations for operating
guidelines to improve the effectiveness
and quality of analyses made by Agency
scientists. Members are scientists who
have sufficient professional
qualifications, including training and
experience, to be capable of providing
expert comments as to the impact on
health and the environment of
regulatory actions under sections 6(b)
and 25(a) of FIFRA. The Deputy
Administrator appoints seven
individuals to serve on the FIFRA SAP
for staggered terms of 4 years, based on
recommendations from the National
Institutes of Health and the National
Science Foundation.
Section 104 of FQPA (Public Law
104–170) established the FQPA Science
Review Board (SRB). These scientists
shall be available to the FIFRA SAP on
an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews
conducted by the FIFRA SAP.
B. Public Meeting
The FIFRA SAP will meet to consider
the Review of Worker Exposure
Assessment Methods. The Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74813
issued its first occupational exposure
testing guidelines in the early 1980s.
These guidelines were intended to
standardize the methodology used to
conduct the studies necessary to allow
the Agency to determine the potential
exposures, and consequently risks,
associated with the activities
surrounding pesticide exposure. These
activities included handling pesticides
(i.e., mixing, loading and applying) as
well as exposures resulting from
working in fields following pesticide
applications (e.g., harvesting, thinning,
weeding). In the early 1990s, the
Pesticide Handlers Exposure Data base
was constructed in order to estimate
exposures resulting from mixing/
loading/applying pesticides. The studies
assembled for use in this data base were
taken from published literature as well
as from industry-generated studies. This
database has been used as the main
source for estimating occupational
exposures to workers handling
pesticides for both registration and
reregistration actions. In 1995, in order
to develop a similar data base which
could be used to address fieldworker
exposures, the Agency issued a data
call-in notice (DCI) for post-application
farmworker exposure data. As a result of
this DCI, every pesticide registrant who
manufactured products that could lead
to post-application farmworker
exposures needed to generate data that
could be used to quantify exposures to
their products.
In response to the issuance of the
1995 DCI, most major pesticide
registrants consolidated their efforts and
formed the Agricultural Reentry Task
Force (ARTF). For more details, see
www.exposuretf.com. The ARTF has
generated the vast majority of the postapplication farmworker exposure
monitoring data since that time. It
follows that the bulk of the data that
have been generated by ARTF include
exposure monitoring studies for a
variety of hand-labor practices in a
range of crops.
The purpose of this meeting of the
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP)
is to evaluate certain methodologies
used to generate exposure studies and
how the Agency uses these and other
studies to conduct occupational
exposure assessments. Three key issues
have been identified by the Agency as
the focus of this review. These include:
• Hand Exposure Methods. Based
upon review of the data, it appears that
the hands are important contributors to
overall exposure levels. In most
monitoring studies used by the Agency,
a wash technique, which is based on
methods described in the scientific
literature, is generally utilized to
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
74814
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices
measure exposure to the hands. The
goal of this evaluation is to identify
issues associated with the use of this
technique and to make
recommendations with regard to how
these data should be interpreted for
exposure assessment purposes based on
factors such as chemical properties and
exposure duration.
• Predictive Capability Of Exposure
Monitoring Techniques. Most exposure
data that are currently available are
based on the use of passive dosimetry
techniques (e.g., whole-body dosimeters
and handwash). These data quantify the
residues that result on the surface of the
skin after completing a job task of some
sort. The purpose of this evaluation is
to characterize the performance of
passive dosimetry as a predictive tool
for risk assessment purposes (e.g.,
through comparison with biological
monitoring data and other possible
analyses).
• Clustering Of Hand Labor Tasks
For Exposure Assessment Purposes. The
crops in the United States that require
hand labor for successful production are
extremely varied and range from field
crops such as lettuce (e.g., harvest is a
key labor requirement) to tree fruit such
as apples (e.g., thinning and harvest are
key labor requirements). Based on the
currently available data and a need to
address exposures related to hand labor
across agriculture, the Agency has
created clusters or groups which
represent categories of exposures that
are believed to be similar for assessment
purposes. These categories allow the
Agency to develop risk estimates for a
wide range of crops and were defined
based on agronomic and ergonomic
similarities in crops and workers,
respectively. The purpose of this
evaluation is to characterize the
methods used to define a representative
cluster and analyze the monitoring data
that pertains to that group which are
then used for exposure assessment
purposes. An example, based on
vineyard and trellis crops will be used
for illustrative purposes.
C. FIFRA SAP Meeting Minutes
The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting
minutes summarizing its
recommendations to the Agency in
approximately 90 days after the
meeting. The meeting minutes will be
posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or
may be obtained by contacting the PIRIB
at the address or telephone number
listed in Unit I.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides
and pests.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:37 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Elizabeth Resek,
Acting Director, Office of Science
Coordination and Policy.
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
[FR Doc. 05–24139 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
AGENCY
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
[Docket No. EPA–R04–SFUND–2005–0460;
which means EPA will not know your
FRL–8009–2]
identity or contact information unless
Sadler Drum Superfund Site, Mulberry, you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
Polk County, FL; Notice of Proposed
comment directly to EPA without going
Settlement
through www.regulations.gov your eAGENCY: Environmental Protection
mail address will be automatically
Agency.
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.
docket and made available on the
SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Internet. If you submit an electronic
Comprehensive Environmental
comment, EPA recommends that you
Response, Compensation and Liability
include your name and other contact
Act (CERCLA), the United States
information in the body of your
Environmental Protection Agency is
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
proposing to enter into a settlement for
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
the partial reimbursement of past
comment due to technical difficulties
response costs concerning the Sadler
and cannot contact you for clarification,
Drum Superfund Site in Mulberry, Polk EPA may not be able to consider your
County, Florida, with Settling Parties,
comment. Electronic files should avoid
Hilton Sadler and Diane Sadler.
the use of special characters, any form
DATES: The Agency will consider public
of encryption, and be free of any defects
comments on the proposed settlement
or viruses. For additional information
until January 17, 2006. The Agency will about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
consider all comments received and
Docket Center homepage at https://
may modify or withdraw its consent to
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
the settlement if comments received
Docket: All documents in the docket
disclose facts or considerations which
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
indicate that the settlement is
index. Although listed in the index,
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. some information is not publicly
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed
available, e.g., CBI or other information
settlement are available from Ms. Paula
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
V. Batchelor. Submit your comments,
Certain other material, such as
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–RO4–
copyrighted material, will be publicly
SFUND–2005–0460 or Site name Sadler available only in hard copy. Publicly
Drum, by one of the following methods: available docket materials are available
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
either electronically in
on-line instructions for submitting
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
comments.
the U.S. EPA Region 4 office located at
• E-mail: Batchelor.Paula@epa.gov.
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
• Fax: (404) 562–8842.
30303. Regional office is open from 7
• Mail: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S.
a.m. until 6:30 p.m. Monday through
EPA Region 4, WMD–SEIMB, 61 Forsyth Friday, excluding legal holidays.
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ‘‘In
Written comments may be submitted
addition, please mail a copy of your
to Ms. Batchelor within 30 calendar
comments on the information collection
days of the date of this publication.
provisions to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Management and Budget (OMB), Attn:
Paula V. Batchelor at 404/562–8887.
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St., NW.,
Dated: December 8, 2005.
Washington, DC 20503.’’
Rosalind H. Brown,
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information
Docket ID No. EPA–EPA–R04–SFUND–
Management Branch, Waste Management
2005–0460. EPA’s policy is that all
Division.
comments received will be included in
[FR Doc. E5–7452 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74810-74814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24139]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471; FRL-7753-1]
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: There will be a 3-day meeting of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to
consider the Review of Worker Exposure Assessment Methods.
DATES: The meeting will be held on February 14-16, 2006, from 8:30
a.m. to approximately 5:00 p.m. eastern time.
Comments. For the deadlines for the submission of requests to
present oral comments and submission of written comments, see Unit I.E.
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Nominations. Nominations of scientific experts to serve as ad hoc
members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting should be provided on or
before December 28, 2005.
Special accommodations. For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably at least 10- days
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process
your request.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at [the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key
Bridge, 1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington,
[[Page 74811]]
VA 22209. The telephone number for the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key
Bridge is (703) 807-2000.
Comments. Written comments may be submitted electronically
preferred, through hand delivery/courier, or by mail. Follow the
detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
Nominations, requests to present oral comments, and special
accommodations: To submit nominations for ad hoc members of the FIFRA
SAP for this meeting, requests for special accommodation arrangements,
or requests to present oral comments, notify the Designated Federal
Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, your request must identify docket ID number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2005-0471 in the subject line on the first page of your
response.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of
Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 564-8498; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail addresses:
christian.myrta@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to
conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection Act of
1996 (FQPA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the DFO
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?
1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this
action under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. The official public
docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this
action, any public comments received, and other information related to
this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket
does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official
public docket is the collection of materials that is available for
public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington,
VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
Agency Website. EDOCKET, EPA's electronic public docket and
comment system was replaced on November 25, 2005, by an enhanced
federal-wide electronic docket management and comment system located at
https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the on-line instruction.
EPA's position paper, charge/questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP
composition (i.e., members and consultants for this meeting) and the
meeting agenda will be available by mid-January 2006. In addition, the
Agency may provide additional background documents as the materials
become available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents,
and certain other related documents that might be available
electronically, from the FIFRA SAP Internet Home Page at https://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap.
An electronic version of the public docket is available through
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may
use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,''
then key in the appropriate docket ID number.
Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA
Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the
official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in
EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted
material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will
be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket.
To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be
made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is
selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify
whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic
public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available
docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1.
EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the
publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public
docket.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy
is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public
docket. Public comments in hard copy that are mailed or delivered to
the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public
docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the
photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with
a brief description written by the docket staff.
C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically (preferred), through hand
delivery/courier, or by mail. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify
the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page
of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within
the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider
these late comments. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or
information protected by statute.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name,
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in
the body of your comment. Also, include this contact information on the
outside of any disk
[[Page 74812]]
or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or
CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the
comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on
the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit
your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in
the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is
placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's
electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment.
i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov,
Attention: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. In contrast to EPA's
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM
that you deliver as described in Unit I.C.2 or mail to the address
provided in Unit I.C.3. These electronic submissions will be accepted
in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption.
2. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
3. By mail. Due to potential delays in EPA's receipt and processing
of mail, respondents are strongly encouraged to submit comments either
electronically or by hand delivery or courier. We cannot guarantee that
comments sent via mail will be received prior to the close of the
comment period. If mailed, please send your comments to: Public
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471.
D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
5. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this
document.
6. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.
E. How May I Participate in this Meeting?
You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471 in the subject line
on the first page of your request.
1. Oral comments. Oral comments presented at the meetings should
not be repetitive of previously submitted oral or written comments.
Although requests to present oral comments are accepted until the date
of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), to the extent that time
permits, interested persons may be permitted by the Chair of the FIFRA
SAP to present oral comments at the meeting. Each individual or group
wishing to make brief oral comments to the FIFRA SAP is strongly
advised to submit their request to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon, eastern time, February 7, 2006,
in order to be included on the meeting agenda. The request should
identify the name of the individual making the presentation, the
organization (if any) the individual will represent, and any
requirements for audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead projector, 35 mm
projector, chalkboard). Oral comments before the FIFRA SAP are limited
to approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In
addition, each speaker should bring 30 copies of his or her comments
and presentation slides for distribution to the FIFRA SAP at the
meeting.
2. Written comments. Although, written comments will be accepted
until the date of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), the Agency
encourages that written comments be submitted, using the instructions
in Unit I.C., no later than noon, eastern time, January 31, 2006, to
provide the FIFRA SAP the time necessary to consider and review the
written comments. It is requested that persons submitting comments
directly to the docket also notify the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. There is no limit on the extent of written
comments for consideration by the FIFRA SAP.
3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be on a
first-come basis. Individuals requiring special accommodations at this
meeting, including wheelchair access and assistance for the hearing
impaired, should contact the DFO at least 10 business days prior to the
meeting using the information under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT so
that appropriate arrangements can be made.
4. Request for nominations of prospective candidates for service as
ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting. As part of a broader
process for developing a pool of candidates for each meeting, the FIFRA
SAP staff routinely solicit the stakeholder community for nominations
of prospective candidates for service as ad hoc members of the FIFRA
SAP. Any interested person or organization may nominate qualified
individuals to be considered as prospective candidates for a specific
meeting. Individuals nominated for this meeting should have expertise
in one or more of the following areas: Occupational exposure
assessment, occupational exposure monitoring, agricultural practices
(especially hand labor practices), statistics, and risk assessment.
Nominees should be scientists who have sufficient professional
qualifications, including training and experience, to be capable of
providing expert comments on the scientific issues for this meeting.
Nominees should be identified by name,
[[Page 74813]]
occupation, position, address, and telephone number. Nominations should
be provided to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on
or before December 28, 2005. The Agency will consider all nominations
of prospective candidates for this meeting that are received on or
before this date. However, final selection of ad hoc members for this
meeting is a discretionary function of the Agency.
The selection of scientists to serve on the FIFRA SAP is based on
the function of the panel and the expertise needed to address the
Agency's charge to the panel. No interested scientists shall be
ineligible to serve by reason of their membership on any other advisory
committee to a Federal department or agency or their employment by a
Federal department or agency (except the EPA). Other factors considered
during the selection process include availability of the potential
panel member to fully participate in the panel's reviews, absence of
any conflicts of interest or appearance of lack of impartiality,
independence with respect to the matters under review, and lack of
bias. Though, financial conflicts of interest, the appearance of lack
of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may result in
disqualification, the absence of such concerns does not assure that a
candidate will be selected to serve on the FIFRA SAP. Numerous
qualified candidates are identified for each panel. Therefore,
selection decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors
including the candidates' areas of expertise and professional
qualifications and achieving an overall balance of different scientific
perspectives on the panel. In order to have the collective breadth of
experience needed to address the Agency's charge for this meeting, the
Agency anticipates selecting approximately 12 ad hoc scientists.
If a prospective candidate for service on the FIFRA SAP is
considered for participation in a particular session, the candidate is
subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch
Financial Disclosure, as supplemented by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As
such, the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to submit a Confidential
Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on
Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA Form 3110-48 5-02) which shall fully disclose, among other
financial interests, the candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and
where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will evaluate the
candidate's financial disclosure form to assess that there are no
financial conflicts of interest, no appearance of lack of impartiality
and no prior involvement with the development of the documents under
consideration (including previous scientific peer review) before the
candidate is considered further for service on the FIFRA SAP.
Those who are selected from the pool of prospective candidates,
will be asked to attend the public meetings, and to participate in the
discussion of key issues and assumptions at these meetings. In
addition, they will be asked to review and to help finalize the meeting
minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP members participating at this meeting
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or may be obtained by
contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone number listed in Unit
I.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP
Amendments to FIFRA enacted November 28, 1975 (7 U.S.C. 136w(d)),
include a requirement under section 25(d) of FIFRA that notices of
intent to cancel, or reclassify pesticide registrations pursuant to
section 6(b)(2) of FIFRA, as well as proposed and final forms of
regulations pursuant to section 25(a) of FIFRA, be submitted to a SAP
prior to being made public or issued to a registrant. In accordance
with section 25(d) of FIFRA, the FIFRA SAP is to have an opportunity to
comment on the health and environmental impact of such actions. The
FIFRA SAP shall also make comments, evaluations, and recommendations
for operating guidelines to improve the effectiveness and quality of
analyses made by Agency scientists. Members are scientists who have
sufficient professional qualifications, including training and
experience, to be capable of providing expert comments as to the impact
on health and the environment of regulatory actions under sections 6(b)
and 25(a) of FIFRA. The Deputy Administrator appoints seven individuals
to serve on the FIFRA SAP for staggered terms of 4 years, based on
recommendations from the National Institutes of Health and the National
Science Foundation.
Section 104 of FQPA (Public Law 104-170) established the FQPA
Science Review Board (SRB). These scientists shall be available to the
FIFRA SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews conducted by the
FIFRA SAP.
B. Public Meeting
The FIFRA SAP will meet to consider the Review of Worker Exposure
Assessment Methods. The Agency issued its first occupational exposure
testing guidelines in the early 1980s. These guidelines were intended
to standardize the methodology used to conduct the studies necessary to
allow the Agency to determine the potential exposures, and consequently
risks, associated with the activities surrounding pesticide exposure.
These activities included handling pesticides (i.e., mixing, loading
and applying) as well as exposures resulting from working in fields
following pesticide applications (e.g., harvesting, thinning, weeding).
In the early 1990s, the Pesticide Handlers Exposure Data base was
constructed in order to estimate exposures resulting from mixing/
loading/applying pesticides. The studies assembled for use in this data
base were taken from published literature as well as from industry-
generated studies. This database has been used as the main source for
estimating occupational exposures to workers handling pesticides for
both registration and reregistration actions. In 1995, in order to
develop a similar data base which could be used to address fieldworker
exposures, the Agency issued a data call-in notice (DCI) for post-
application farmworker exposure data. As a result of this DCI, every
pesticide registrant who manufactured products that could lead to post-
application farmworker exposures needed to generate data that could be
used to quantify exposures to their products.
In response to the issuance of the 1995 DCI, most major pesticide
registrants consolidated their efforts and formed the Agricultural
Reentry Task Force (ARTF). For more details, see www.exposuretf.com.
The ARTF has generated the vast majority of the post-application
farmworker exposure monitoring data since that time. It follows that
the bulk of the data that have been generated by ARTF include exposure
monitoring studies for a variety of hand-labor practices in a range of
crops.
The purpose of this meeting of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel
(SAP) is to evaluate certain methodologies used to generate exposure
studies and how the Agency uses these and other studies to conduct
occupational exposure assessments. Three key issues have been
identified by the Agency as the focus of this review. These include:
Hand Exposure Methods. Based upon review of the data, it
appears that the hands are important contributors to overall exposure
levels. In most monitoring studies used by the Agency, a wash
technique, which is based on methods described in the scientific
literature, is generally utilized to
[[Page 74814]]
measure exposure to the hands. The goal of this evaluation is to
identify issues associated with the use of this technique and to make
recommendations with regard to how these data should be interpreted for
exposure assessment purposes based on factors such as chemical
properties and exposure duration.
Predictive Capability Of Exposure Monitoring Techniques.
Most exposure data that are currently available are based on the use of
passive dosimetry techniques (e.g., whole-body dosimeters and
handwash). These data quantify the residues that result on the surface
of the skin after completing a job task of some sort. The purpose of
this evaluation is to characterize the performance of passive dosimetry
as a predictive tool for risk assessment purposes (e.g., through
comparison with biological monitoring data and other possible
analyses).
Clustering Of Hand Labor Tasks For Exposure Assessment
Purposes. The crops in the United States that require hand labor for
successful production are extremely varied and range from field crops
such as lettuce (e.g., harvest is a key labor requirement) to tree
fruit such as apples (e.g., thinning and harvest are key labor
requirements). Based on the currently available data and a need to
address exposures related to hand labor across agriculture, the Agency
has created clusters or groups which represent categories of exposures
that are believed to be similar for assessment purposes. These
categories allow the Agency to develop risk estimates for a wide range
of crops and were defined based on agronomic and ergonomic similarities
in crops and workers, respectively. The purpose of this evaluation is
to characterize the methods used to define a representative cluster and
analyze the monitoring data that pertains to that group which are then
used for exposure assessment purposes. An example, based on vineyard
and trellis crops will be used for illustrative purposes.
C. FIFRA SAP Meeting Minutes
The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its
recommendations to the Agency in approximately 90 days after the
meeting. The meeting minutes will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site
or may be obtained by contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone
number listed in Unit I.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Elizabeth Resek,
Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-24139 Filed 12-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S