FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting, 74810-74814 [05-24139]

Download as PDF 74810 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices Proposed Revised Land Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Several Counties, AR; and LeFlore and McCurtain Counties, OK. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. EIS No. 20050466, ERP No. F–COE– C39018–NJ, Liberty State Park Ecosystem Restoration Project, Hudson Raritan Estuary Study, To Address the Adverse Impacts Associated with Past Filling Activities, Port Authority of New and New Jersey City, Hudson County, NJ. Summary: No formal comment letter sent to preparing agency. EIS No. 20050467, ERP No. F–COE– C39017–NY, Montuak Point Storm Damage Reduction Project, Proposed Reinforcement of an Existing Stone Revetment Wall, Suffolk County, NY. Summary: No comment letter was sent was sent to the proposing agency. EIS No. 20050477, ERP No. F–COE– K36141–AZ, Santa Cruz River, Paseo de las Iglesias Feasibility Study, To Identify, Define and Solve Environmental Degradation, Flooding and Water Resource Problems, City of Tucson, Pima County, AZ. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. EIS No. 20050352, ERP No. FS–NPS– L65264–WA, Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Project, Updated Information, Olympic Peninsula, Challam County, WA. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. Dated: December 13, 2005. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E5–7444 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6670–3] Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed December 5, 2005 Through December 9, 2005 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. EIS No. 20050515, Draft EIS, NPS, FL, Fort King National Historic Landmark, Special Resource Study, VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001 Implementation, Second Seminole War Site, City of Ocala, Marion County, FL, Comment Period Ends: January 30, 2006, Contact: Tim Bemisderfer 404–562–3124. EIS No. 20050516, Draft Supplement, DOI, 00, Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, Comprehensive Conservation Plan, A New Alternative E: Modified Wildlife and Integrated Public Use, Implementation, MN, WI, IL and IA, Comment Period Ends: February 3, 2005, Contact: Don Hultman 507– 452–4232. This document is available on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/ midwest/planning/uppermiss/ index.html. EIS No. 20050517, Final EIS, FHW, PA, US–219 Improvements Project, Meyersdale to Somerset, SR 6219, Section 020, Funding, U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Somerset County, PA, Wait Period Ends: January 23, 2006, Contact: James A. Cheatham 717–221–3461. EIS No. 20050518, Draft EIS, BLM, WY, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas Field Development Project, Proposed Natural Gas Development to 2000 Wells, 1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to Other Formations, Carbon County, WY, Comment Period Ends: January 30, 2006, Contact: David Simons 307– 328–4328 EIS No. 20050519, Final EIS, FHW, RI, U.S. Route 6/Route 10 Interchange Improvement Project, To Identify Transportation Alternative, Funding, City of Providence County, RI, Wait Period Ends: January 17, 2006, Contact: Ralph Rizzo 401–528–4548. EIS No. 20050520, Draft EIS, BIA, OR, Coyote Business Park, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Proposes to Develop, Build and Manage a Light Industrial Commercial Business Park, Umatilla County, OR, Comment Period Ends: January 30, 2006, Contact: Jerry L. Lauer 541–278–3786. EIS No. 20050521, Draft EIS, BLM, AZ, Arizona Strip Field Office Resource Management Plan, which includes: Vermilion Cliffs National Monument, Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Parashant) BLM Portion, General Management Plan for the Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument NPS Portion of Parashant, Implementation, AZ, Comment Period Ends: January 30, 2006, Contact: Diana Hawks 435–688–3266. EIS No. 20050522, Final EIS, NPS, TX, Big Thicket National Preserve Oil and Gas Management Plan, Implementation, Hardin, Jefferson, Orange, Liberty, Tyler, Jasper and Polk Counties, TX, Wait Period Ends: PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 January 17, 2006, Contact: Linda Dansby 505–988–6095. Amended Notices EIS No. 20050411, Draft EIS, IBR, CA, Central Valley Project, West San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit LongTerm Water Service Contract Renewal, Cities of Avenal, Coalinga and Huron, Fresno, King and Merced Counties, CA, Comment Period Ends: January 17, 2006, Contact: Shane Hunt, 559–487–5138 Revision to FR Notice Published October 7, 2005: Comment Period Extend from November 25, 2005 to January 17, 2006. Dated: December 13, 2005. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E5–7446 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471; FRL–7753–1] FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: There will be a 3–day meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to consider the Review of Worker Exposure Assessment Methods. DATES: The meeting will be held on February 14–16, 2006, from 8:30 a.m. to approximately 5:00 p.m. eastern time. Comments. For the deadlines for the submission of requests to present oral comments and submission of written comments, see Unit I.E. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Nominations. Nominations of scientific experts to serve as ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting should be provided on or before December 28, 2005. Special accommodations. For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a disability, please contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably at least 10– days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at [the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge, 1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington, E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices VA 22209. The telephone number for the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key Bridge is (703) 807–2000. Comments. Written comments may be submitted electronically preferred, through hand delivery/courier, or by mail. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Nominations, requests to present oral comments, and special accommodations: To submit nominations for ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting, requests for special accommodation arrangements, or requests to present oral comments, notify the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, your request must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2005–0471 in the subject line on the first page of your response. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564–8498; fax number: (202) 564–8382; e-mail addresses: christian.myrta@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? This action is directed to the public in general. This action may, however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2005–0471. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001 restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305–5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at https:// www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. Agency Website. EDOCKET, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system was replaced on November 25, 2005, by an enhanced federal-wide electronic docket management and comment system located at https:// www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instruction. EPA’s position paper, charge/ questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP composition (i.e., members and consultants for this meeting) and the meeting agenda will be available by mid-January 2006. In addition, the Agency may provide additional background documents as the materials become available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents, and certain other related documents that might be available electronically, from the FIFRA SAP Internet Home Page at https://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74811 document is available for viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA’s electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA’s electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA’s electronic public docket. Public comments in hard copy that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff. C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically (preferred), through hand delivery/courier, or by mail. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to consider these late comments. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other contact information in the body of your comment. Also, include this contact information on the outside of any disk E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 74812 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. EPA’s policy is that EPA will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA’s electronic public docket to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’ and then key in docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005– 0471. The system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov, Attention: Docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2005–0471. In contrast to EPA’s electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket without going through EPA’s electronic public docket, EPA’s e-mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses that are automatically captured by EPA’s e-mail system are included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you deliver as described in Unit I.C.2 or mail to the address provided in Unit I.C.3. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption. 2. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471. Such deliveries are only accepted VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001 during the docket’s normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1. 3. By mail. Due to potential delays in EPA’s receipt and processing of mail, respondents are strongly encouraged to submit comments either electronically or by hand delivery or courier. We cannot guarantee that comments sent via mail will be received prior to the close of the comment period. If mailed, please send your comments to: Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001, Attention: Docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471. D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: 1. Explain your views as clearly as possible. 2. Describe any assumptions that you used. 3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used that support your views. 4. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns. 5. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this document. 6. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation. E. How May I Participate in this Meeting? You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that you identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0471 in the subject line on the first page of your request. 1. Oral comments. Oral comments presented at the meetings should not be repetitive of previously submitted oral or written comments. Although requests to present oral comments are accepted until the date of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), to the extent that time permits, interested persons may be permitted by the Chair of the FIFRA SAP to present oral comments at the meeting. Each individual or group wishing to make brief oral comments to the FIFRA SAP is strongly advised to submit their request to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon, eastern time, February 7, 2006, in order to be PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 included on the meeting agenda. The request should identify the name of the individual making the presentation, the organization (if any) the individual will represent, and any requirements for audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead projector, 35 mm projector, chalkboard). Oral comments before the FIFRA SAP are limited to approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In addition, each speaker should bring 30 copies of his or her comments and presentation slides for distribution to the FIFRA SAP at the meeting. 2. Written comments. Although, written comments will be accepted until the date of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), the Agency encourages that written comments be submitted, using the instructions in Unit I.C., no later than noon, eastern time, January 31, 2006, to provide the FIFRA SAP the time necessary to consider and review the written comments. It is requested that persons submitting comments directly to the docket also notify the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. There is no limit on the extent of written comments for consideration by the FIFRA SAP. 3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be on a first-come basis. Individuals requiring special accommodations at this meeting, including wheelchair access and assistance for the hearing impaired, should contact the DFO at least 10 business days prior to the meeting using the information under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT so that appropriate arrangements can be made. 4. Request for nominations of prospective candidates for service as ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting. As part of a broader process for developing a pool of candidates for each meeting, the FIFRA SAP staff routinely solicit the stakeholder community for nominations of prospective candidates for service as ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP. Any interested person or organization may nominate qualified individuals to be considered as prospective candidates for a specific meeting. Individuals nominated for this meeting should have expertise in one or more of the following areas: Occupational exposure assessment, occupational exposure monitoring, agricultural practices (especially hand labor practices), statistics, and risk assessment. Nominees should be scientists who have sufficient professional qualifications, including training and experience, to be capable of providing expert comments on the scientific issues for this meeting. Nominees should be identified by name, E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices occupation, position, address, and telephone number. Nominations should be provided to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on or before December 28, 2005. The Agency will consider all nominations of prospective candidates for this meeting that are received on or before this date. However, final selection of ad hoc members for this meeting is a discretionary function of the Agency. The selection of scientists to serve on the FIFRA SAP is based on the function of the panel and the expertise needed to address the Agency’s charge to the panel. No interested scientists shall be ineligible to serve by reason of their membership on any other advisory committee to a Federal department or agency or their employment by a Federal department or agency (except the EPA). Other factors considered during the selection process include availability of the potential panel member to fully participate in the panel’s reviews, absence of any conflicts of interest or appearance of lack of impartiality, independence with respect to the matters under review, and lack of bias. Though, financial conflicts of interest, the appearance of lack of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may result in disqualification, the absence of such concerns does not assure that a candidate will be selected to serve on the FIFRA SAP. Numerous qualified candidates are identified for each panel. Therefore, selection decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors including the candidates’ areas of expertise and professional qualifications and achieving an overall balance of different scientific perspectives on the panel. In order to have the collective breadth of experience needed to address the Agency’s charge for this meeting, the Agency anticipates selecting approximately 12 ad hoc scientists. If a prospective candidate for service on the FIFRA SAP is considered for participation in a particular session, the candidate is subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch Financial Disclosure, as supplemented by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As such, the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to submit a Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Form 3110–48 5–02) which shall fully disclose, among other financial interests, the candidate’s employment, stocks and bonds, and where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will evaluate the candidate’s financial disclosure form to assess that there are VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001 no financial conflicts of interest, no appearance of lack of impartiality and no prior involvement with the development of the documents under consideration (including previous scientific peer review) before the candidate is considered further for service on the FIFRA SAP. Those who are selected from the pool of prospective candidates, will be asked to attend the public meetings, and to participate in the discussion of key issues and assumptions at these meetings. In addition, they will be asked to review and to help finalize the meeting minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP members participating at this meeting will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or may be obtained by contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone number listed in Unit I. II. Background A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP Amendments to FIFRA enacted November 28, 1975 (7 U.S.C. 136w(d)), include a requirement under section 25(d) of FIFRA that notices of intent to cancel, or reclassify pesticide registrations pursuant to section 6(b)(2) of FIFRA, as well as proposed and final forms of regulations pursuant to section 25(a) of FIFRA, be submitted to a SAP prior to being made public or issued to a registrant. In accordance with section 25(d) of FIFRA, the FIFRA SAP is to have an opportunity to comment on the health and environmental impact of such actions. The FIFRA SAP shall also make comments, evaluations, and recommendations for operating guidelines to improve the effectiveness and quality of analyses made by Agency scientists. Members are scientists who have sufficient professional qualifications, including training and experience, to be capable of providing expert comments as to the impact on health and the environment of regulatory actions under sections 6(b) and 25(a) of FIFRA. The Deputy Administrator appoints seven individuals to serve on the FIFRA SAP for staggered terms of 4 years, based on recommendations from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Section 104 of FQPA (Public Law 104–170) established the FQPA Science Review Board (SRB). These scientists shall be available to the FIFRA SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews conducted by the FIFRA SAP. B. Public Meeting The FIFRA SAP will meet to consider the Review of Worker Exposure Assessment Methods. The Agency PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74813 issued its first occupational exposure testing guidelines in the early 1980s. These guidelines were intended to standardize the methodology used to conduct the studies necessary to allow the Agency to determine the potential exposures, and consequently risks, associated with the activities surrounding pesticide exposure. These activities included handling pesticides (i.e., mixing, loading and applying) as well as exposures resulting from working in fields following pesticide applications (e.g., harvesting, thinning, weeding). In the early 1990s, the Pesticide Handlers Exposure Data base was constructed in order to estimate exposures resulting from mixing/ loading/applying pesticides. The studies assembled for use in this data base were taken from published literature as well as from industry-generated studies. This database has been used as the main source for estimating occupational exposures to workers handling pesticides for both registration and reregistration actions. In 1995, in order to develop a similar data base which could be used to address fieldworker exposures, the Agency issued a data call-in notice (DCI) for post-application farmworker exposure data. As a result of this DCI, every pesticide registrant who manufactured products that could lead to post-application farmworker exposures needed to generate data that could be used to quantify exposures to their products. In response to the issuance of the 1995 DCI, most major pesticide registrants consolidated their efforts and formed the Agricultural Reentry Task Force (ARTF). For more details, see www.exposuretf.com. The ARTF has generated the vast majority of the postapplication farmworker exposure monitoring data since that time. It follows that the bulk of the data that have been generated by ARTF include exposure monitoring studies for a variety of hand-labor practices in a range of crops. The purpose of this meeting of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) is to evaluate certain methodologies used to generate exposure studies and how the Agency uses these and other studies to conduct occupational exposure assessments. Three key issues have been identified by the Agency as the focus of this review. These include: • Hand Exposure Methods. Based upon review of the data, it appears that the hands are important contributors to overall exposure levels. In most monitoring studies used by the Agency, a wash technique, which is based on methods described in the scientific literature, is generally utilized to E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1 74814 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Notices measure exposure to the hands. The goal of this evaluation is to identify issues associated with the use of this technique and to make recommendations with regard to how these data should be interpreted for exposure assessment purposes based on factors such as chemical properties and exposure duration. • Predictive Capability Of Exposure Monitoring Techniques. Most exposure data that are currently available are based on the use of passive dosimetry techniques (e.g., whole-body dosimeters and handwash). These data quantify the residues that result on the surface of the skin after completing a job task of some sort. The purpose of this evaluation is to characterize the performance of passive dosimetry as a predictive tool for risk assessment purposes (e.g., through comparison with biological monitoring data and other possible analyses). • Clustering Of Hand Labor Tasks For Exposure Assessment Purposes. The crops in the United States that require hand labor for successful production are extremely varied and range from field crops such as lettuce (e.g., harvest is a key labor requirement) to tree fruit such as apples (e.g., thinning and harvest are key labor requirements). Based on the currently available data and a need to address exposures related to hand labor across agriculture, the Agency has created clusters or groups which represent categories of exposures that are believed to be similar for assessment purposes. These categories allow the Agency to develop risk estimates for a wide range of crops and were defined based on agronomic and ergonomic similarities in crops and workers, respectively. The purpose of this evaluation is to characterize the methods used to define a representative cluster and analyze the monitoring data that pertains to that group which are then used for exposure assessment purposes. An example, based on vineyard and trellis crops will be used for illustrative purposes. C. FIFRA SAP Meeting Minutes The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its recommendations to the Agency in approximately 90 days after the meeting. The meeting minutes will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or may be obtained by contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone number listed in Unit I. List of Subjects Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests. VerDate Aug<31>2005 19:37 Dec 15, 2005 Jkt 208001 Dated: December 6, 2005. Elizabeth Resek, Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy. www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information [FR Doc. 05–24139 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am] whose disclosure is restricted by statute. BILLING CODE 6560–50–S Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web AGENCY site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, [Docket No. EPA–R04–SFUND–2005–0460; which means EPA will not know your FRL–8009–2] identity or contact information unless Sadler Drum Superfund Site, Mulberry, you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail Polk County, FL; Notice of Proposed comment directly to EPA without going Settlement through www.regulations.gov your eAGENCY: Environmental Protection mail address will be automatically Agency. captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement. docket and made available on the SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Internet. If you submit an electronic Comprehensive Environmental comment, EPA recommends that you Response, Compensation and Liability include your name and other contact Act (CERCLA), the United States information in the body of your Environmental Protection Agency is comment and with any disk or CD–ROM proposing to enter into a settlement for you submit. If EPA cannot read your the partial reimbursement of past comment due to technical difficulties response costs concerning the Sadler and cannot contact you for clarification, Drum Superfund Site in Mulberry, Polk EPA may not be able to consider your County, Florida, with Settling Parties, comment. Electronic files should avoid Hilton Sadler and Diane Sadler. the use of special characters, any form DATES: The Agency will consider public of encryption, and be free of any defects comments on the proposed settlement or viruses. For additional information until January 17, 2006. The Agency will about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA consider all comments received and Docket Center homepage at https:// may modify or withdraw its consent to www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. the settlement if comments received Docket: All documents in the docket disclose facts or considerations which are listed in the www.regulations.gov indicate that the settlement is index. Although listed in the index, inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. some information is not publicly ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed available, e.g., CBI or other information settlement are available from Ms. Paula whose disclosure is restricted by statute. V. Batchelor. Submit your comments, Certain other material, such as identified by Docket ID No. EPA–RO4– copyrighted material, will be publicly SFUND–2005–0460 or Site name Sadler available only in hard copy. Publicly Drum, by one of the following methods: available docket materials are available • www.regulations.gov: Follow the either electronically in on-line instructions for submitting www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at comments. the U.S. EPA Region 4 office located at • E-mail: Batchelor.Paula@epa.gov. 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia • Fax: (404) 562–8842. 30303. Regional office is open from 7 • Mail: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. a.m. until 6:30 p.m. Monday through EPA Region 4, WMD–SEIMB, 61 Forsyth Friday, excluding legal holidays. Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ‘‘In Written comments may be submitted addition, please mail a copy of your to Ms. Batchelor within 30 calendar comments on the information collection days of the date of this publication. provisions to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Management and Budget (OMB), Attn: Paula V. Batchelor at 404/562–8887. Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th St., NW., Dated: December 8, 2005. Washington, DC 20503.’’ Rosalind H. Brown, Instructions: Direct your comments to Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Docket ID No. EPA–EPA–R04–SFUND– Management Branch, Waste Management 2005–0460. EPA’s policy is that all Division. comments received will be included in [FR Doc. E5–7452 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am] the public docket without change and may be made available online at BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM 16DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74810-74814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471; FRL-7753-1]


FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  There will be a 3-day meeting of the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP) to 
consider the Review of Worker Exposure Assessment Methods.

DATES:  The meeting will be held on February 14-16, 2006, from 8:30 
a.m. to approximately 5:00 p.m. eastern time.
     Comments. For the deadlines for the submission of requests to 
present oral comments and submission of written comments, see Unit I.E. 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
     Nominations. Nominations of scientific experts to serve as ad hoc 
members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting should be provided on or 
before December 28, 2005.
     Special accommodations. For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact the Designated Federal Official (DFO) listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, preferably at least 10- days 
prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process 
your request.

ADDRESSES:  The meeting will be held at [the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key 
Bridge, 1900 North Fort Myer Drive, Arlington,

[[Page 74811]]

VA 22209. The telephone number for the Holiday Inn Rosslyn at Key 
Bridge is (703) 807-2000.
     Comments. Written comments may be submitted electronically 
preferred, through hand delivery/courier, or by mail. Follow the 
detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION.
     Nominations, requests to present oral comments, and special 
accommodations: To submit nominations for ad hoc members of the FIFRA 
SAP for this meeting, requests for special accommodation arrangements, 
or requests to present oral comments, notify the Designated Federal 
Official (DFO) listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. To ensure 
proper receipt by EPA, your request must identify docket ID number EPA-
HQ-OPP-2005-0471 in the subject line on the first page of your 
response.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Myrta R. Christian, DFO, Office of 
Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone 
number: (202) 564-8498; fax number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail addresses: 
christian.myrta@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

     This action is directed to the public in general. This action may, 
however, be of interest to persons who are or may be required to 
conduct testing of chemical substances under the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), FIFRA, and the Food Quality Protection Act of 
1996 (FQPA). Since other entities may also be interested, the Agency 
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be 
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the 
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the DFO 
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this 
action under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. The official public 
docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this 
action, any public comments received, and other information related to 
this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket 
does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official 
public docket is the collection of materials that is available for 
public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch 
(PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, 
VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number 
is (703) 305-5805.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document 
electronically under the ``Federal Register'' listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.
     Agency Website. EDOCKET, EPA's electronic public docket and 
comment system was replaced on November 25, 2005, by an enhanced 
federal-wide electronic docket management and comment system located at 
https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the on-line instruction.
     EPA's position paper, charge/questions to the FIFRA SAP, FIFRA SAP 
composition (i.e., members and consultants for this meeting) and the 
meeting agenda will be available by mid-January 2006. In addition, the 
Agency may provide additional background documents as the materials 
become available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents, 
and certain other related documents that might be available 
electronically, from the FIFRA SAP Internet Home Page at https://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap.
     An electronic version of the public docket is available through 
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may 
use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public 
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official 
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that 
are available electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,'' 
then key in the appropriate docket ID number.
     Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA 
Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the 
official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in 
EPA's electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted 
material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will 
be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. 
To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be 
made available in EPA's electronic public docket. When a document is 
selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify 
whether the document is available for viewing in EPA's electronic 
public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available 
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available 
docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. 
EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the 
publicly available docket materials through EPA's electronic public 
docket.
     For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy 
is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper, 
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public 
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment 
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment 
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that 
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's 
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the 
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
     Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or 
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public 
docket. Public comments in hard copy that are mailed or delivered to 
the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public 
docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the 
photograph will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with 
a brief description written by the docket staff.

C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

     You may submit comments electronically (preferred), through hand 
delivery/courier, or by mail. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify 
the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page 
of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within 
the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the 
comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider 
these late comments. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or 
information protected by statute.
    1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as 
prescribed in this unit, EPA recommends that you include your name, 
mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in 
the body of your comment. Also, include this contact information on the 
outside of any disk

[[Page 74812]]

or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the disk or 
CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the 
comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on 
the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA will not edit 
your comment, and any identifying or contact information provided in 
the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA's 
electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment.
    i. EPA Dockets. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to 
submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for 
receiving comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/, and follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 
Once in the system, select ``search,'' and then key in docket ID number 
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, 
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other 
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    ii. E-mail. Comments may be sent by e-mail to opp-docket@epa.gov, 
Attention: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. In contrast to EPA's 
electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an ``anonymous 
access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the docket 
without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail 
system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses 
that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as 
part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and 
made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
    iii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM 
that you deliver as described in Unit I.C.2 or mail to the address 
provided in Unit I.C.3. These electronic submissions will be accepted 
in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special 
characters and any form of encryption.
    2. By hand delivery or courier. Deliver your comments to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Office of Pesticide 
Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 
2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA, Attention: Docket ID 
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471. Such deliveries are only accepted during 
the docket's normal hours of operation as identified in Unit I.B.1.
    3. By mail. Due to potential delays in EPA's receipt and processing 
of mail, respondents are strongly encouraged to submit comments either 
electronically or by hand delivery or courier. We cannot guarantee that 
comments sent via mail will be received prior to the close of the 
comment period. If mailed, please send your comments to: Public 
Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB) (7502C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001, Attention: Docket ID 
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471.

D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your 
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used 
that support your views.
    4. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
    5. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline in this 
document.
    6. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket 
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page 
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal 
Register citation.

E. How May I Participate in this Meeting?

     You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions 
in this unit. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, it is imperative that 
you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0471 in the subject line 
on the first page of your request.
    1. Oral comments. Oral comments presented at the meetings should 
not be repetitive of previously submitted oral or written comments. 
Although requests to present oral comments are accepted until the date 
of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), to the extent that time 
permits, interested persons may be permitted by the Chair of the FIFRA 
SAP to present oral comments at the meeting. Each individual or group 
wishing to make brief oral comments to the FIFRA SAP is strongly 
advised to submit their request to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT no later than noon, eastern time, February 7, 2006, 
in order to be included on the meeting agenda. The request should 
identify the name of the individual making the presentation, the 
organization (if any) the individual will represent, and any 
requirements for audiovisual equipment (e.g., overhead projector, 35 mm 
projector, chalkboard). Oral comments before the FIFRA SAP are limited 
to approximately 5 minutes unless prior arrangements have been made. In 
addition, each speaker should bring 30 copies of his or her comments 
and presentation slides for distribution to the FIFRA SAP at the 
meeting.
    2. Written comments. Although, written comments will be accepted 
until the date of the meeting (unless otherwise stated), the Agency 
encourages that written comments be submitted, using the instructions 
in Unit I.C., no later than noon, eastern time, January 31, 2006, to 
provide the FIFRA SAP the time necessary to consider and review the 
written comments. It is requested that persons submitting comments 
directly to the docket also notify the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT. There is no limit on the extent of written 
comments for consideration by the FIFRA SAP.
    3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be on a 
first-come basis. Individuals requiring special accommodations at this 
meeting, including wheelchair access and assistance for the hearing 
impaired, should contact the DFO at least 10 business days prior to the 
meeting using the information under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT so 
that appropriate arrangements can be made.
    4. Request for nominations of prospective candidates for service as 
ad hoc members of the FIFRA SAP for this meeting. As part of a broader 
process for developing a pool of candidates for each meeting, the FIFRA 
SAP staff routinely solicit the stakeholder community for nominations 
of prospective candidates for service as ad hoc members of the FIFRA 
SAP. Any interested person or organization may nominate qualified 
individuals to be considered as prospective candidates for a specific 
meeting. Individuals nominated for this meeting should have expertise 
in one or more of the following areas: Occupational exposure 
assessment, occupational exposure monitoring, agricultural practices 
(especially hand labor practices), statistics, and risk assessment. 
Nominees should be scientists who have sufficient professional 
qualifications, including training and experience, to be capable of 
providing expert comments on the scientific issues for this meeting. 
Nominees should be identified by name,

[[Page 74813]]

occupation, position, address, and telephone number. Nominations should 
be provided to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT on 
or before December 28, 2005. The Agency will consider all nominations 
of prospective candidates for this meeting that are received on or 
before this date. However, final selection of ad hoc members for this 
meeting is a discretionary function of the Agency.
     The selection of scientists to serve on the FIFRA SAP is based on 
the function of the panel and the expertise needed to address the 
Agency's charge to the panel. No interested scientists shall be 
ineligible to serve by reason of their membership on any other advisory 
committee to a Federal department or agency or their employment by a 
Federal department or agency (except the EPA). Other factors considered 
during the selection process include availability of the potential 
panel member to fully participate in the panel's reviews, absence of 
any conflicts of interest or appearance of lack of impartiality, 
independence with respect to the matters under review, and lack of 
bias. Though, financial conflicts of interest, the appearance of lack 
of impartiality, lack of independence, and bias may result in 
disqualification, the absence of such concerns does not assure that a 
candidate will be selected to serve on the FIFRA SAP. Numerous 
qualified candidates are identified for each panel. Therefore, 
selection decisions involve carefully weighing a number of factors 
including the candidates' areas of expertise and professional 
qualifications and achieving an overall balance of different scientific 
perspectives on the panel. In order to have the collective breadth of 
experience needed to address the Agency's charge for this meeting, the 
Agency anticipates selecting approximately 12 ad hoc scientists.
     If a prospective candidate for service on the FIFRA SAP is 
considered for participation in a particular session, the candidate is 
subject to the provisions of 5 CFR part 2634, Executive Branch 
Financial Disclosure, as supplemented by the EPA in 5 CFR part 6401. As 
such, the FIFRA SAP candidate is required to submit a Confidential 
Financial Disclosure Form for Special Government Employees Serving on 
Federal Advisory Committees at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA Form 3110-48 5-02) which shall fully disclose, among other 
financial interests, the candidate's employment, stocks and bonds, and 
where applicable, sources of research support. EPA will evaluate the 
candidate's financial disclosure form to assess that there are no 
financial conflicts of interest, no appearance of lack of impartiality 
and no prior involvement with the development of the documents under 
consideration (including previous scientific peer review) before the 
candidate is considered further for service on the FIFRA SAP.
     Those who are selected from the pool of prospective candidates, 
will be asked to attend the public meetings, and to participate in the 
discussion of key issues and assumptions at these meetings. In 
addition, they will be asked to review and to help finalize the meeting 
minutes. The list of FIFRA SAP members participating at this meeting 
will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site or may be obtained by 
contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone number listed in Unit 
I.

II. Background

A. Purpose of the FIFRA SAP

     Amendments to FIFRA enacted November 28, 1975 (7 U.S.C. 136w(d)), 
include a requirement under section 25(d) of FIFRA that notices of 
intent to cancel, or reclassify pesticide registrations pursuant to 
section 6(b)(2) of FIFRA, as well as proposed and final forms of 
regulations pursuant to section 25(a) of FIFRA, be submitted to a SAP 
prior to being made public or issued to a registrant. In accordance 
with section 25(d) of FIFRA, the FIFRA SAP is to have an opportunity to 
comment on the health and environmental impact of such actions. The 
FIFRA SAP shall also make comments, evaluations, and recommendations 
for operating guidelines to improve the effectiveness and quality of 
analyses made by Agency scientists. Members are scientists who have 
sufficient professional qualifications, including training and 
experience, to be capable of providing expert comments as to the impact 
on health and the environment of regulatory actions under sections 6(b) 
and 25(a) of FIFRA. The Deputy Administrator appoints seven individuals 
to serve on the FIFRA SAP for staggered terms of 4 years, based on 
recommendations from the National Institutes of Health and the National 
Science Foundation.
     Section 104 of FQPA (Public Law 104-170) established the FQPA 
Science Review Board (SRB). These scientists shall be available to the 
FIFRA SAP on an ad hoc basis to assist in reviews conducted by the 
FIFRA SAP.

B. Public Meeting

     The FIFRA SAP will meet to consider the Review of Worker Exposure 
Assessment Methods. The Agency issued its first occupational exposure 
testing guidelines in the early 1980s. These guidelines were intended 
to standardize the methodology used to conduct the studies necessary to 
allow the Agency to determine the potential exposures, and consequently 
risks, associated with the activities surrounding pesticide exposure. 
These activities included handling pesticides (i.e., mixing, loading 
and applying) as well as exposures resulting from working in fields 
following pesticide applications (e.g., harvesting, thinning, weeding). 
In the early 1990s, the Pesticide Handlers Exposure Data base was 
constructed in order to estimate exposures resulting from mixing/
loading/applying pesticides. The studies assembled for use in this data 
base were taken from published literature as well as from industry-
generated studies. This database has been used as the main source for 
estimating occupational exposures to workers handling pesticides for 
both registration and reregistration actions. In 1995, in order to 
develop a similar data base which could be used to address fieldworker 
exposures, the Agency issued a data call-in notice (DCI) for post-
application farmworker exposure data. As a result of this DCI, every 
pesticide registrant who manufactured products that could lead to post-
application farmworker exposures needed to generate data that could be 
used to quantify exposures to their products.
     In response to the issuance of the 1995 DCI, most major pesticide 
registrants consolidated their efforts and formed the Agricultural 
Reentry Task Force (ARTF). For more details, see www.exposuretf.com. 
The ARTF has generated the vast majority of the post-application 
farmworker exposure monitoring data since that time. It follows that 
the bulk of the data that have been generated by ARTF include exposure 
monitoring studies for a variety of hand-labor practices in a range of 
crops.
     The purpose of this meeting of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel 
(SAP) is to evaluate certain methodologies used to generate exposure 
studies and how the Agency uses these and other studies to conduct 
occupational exposure assessments. Three key issues have been 
identified by the Agency as the focus of this review. These include:
      Hand Exposure Methods. Based upon review of the data, it 
appears that the hands are important contributors to overall exposure 
levels. In most monitoring studies used by the Agency, a wash 
technique, which is based on methods described in the scientific 
literature, is generally utilized to

[[Page 74814]]

measure exposure to the hands. The goal of this evaluation is to 
identify issues associated with the use of this technique and to make 
recommendations with regard to how these data should be interpreted for 
exposure assessment purposes based on factors such as chemical 
properties and exposure duration.
      Predictive Capability Of Exposure Monitoring Techniques. 
Most exposure data that are currently available are based on the use of 
passive dosimetry techniques (e.g., whole-body dosimeters and 
handwash). These data quantify the residues that result on the surface 
of the skin after completing a job task of some sort. The purpose of 
this evaluation is to characterize the performance of passive dosimetry 
as a predictive tool for risk assessment purposes (e.g., through 
comparison with biological monitoring data and other possible 
analyses).
     Clustering Of Hand Labor Tasks For Exposure Assessment 
Purposes. The crops in the United States that require hand labor for 
successful production are extremely varied and range from field crops 
such as lettuce (e.g., harvest is a key labor requirement) to tree 
fruit such as apples (e.g., thinning and harvest are key labor 
requirements). Based on the currently available data and a need to 
address exposures related to hand labor across agriculture, the Agency 
has created clusters or groups which represent categories of exposures 
that are believed to be similar for assessment purposes. These 
categories allow the Agency to develop risk estimates for a wide range 
of crops and were defined based on agronomic and ergonomic similarities 
in crops and workers, respectively. The purpose of this evaluation is 
to characterize the methods used to define a representative cluster and 
analyze the monitoring data that pertains to that group which are then 
used for exposure assessment purposes. An example, based on vineyard 
and trellis crops will be used for illustrative purposes.

C. FIFRA SAP Meeting Minutes

     The FIFRA SAP will prepare meeting minutes summarizing its 
recommendations to the Agency in approximately 90 days after the 
meeting. The meeting minutes will be posted on the FIFRA SAP web site 
or may be obtained by contacting the PIRIB at the address or telephone 
number listed in Unit I.

List of Subjects

     Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: December 6, 2005.
Elizabeth Resek,
 Acting Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-24139 Filed 12-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.