Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports; Certain Dangerous Cargoes; Electronic Submission, 74663-74669 [05-24126]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
With respect to Executive Order
12988, the Office of the Solicitor has
determined that this final rule will not
unduly burden the judicial system, and
meets the requirements of Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of the Executive Order.
Consultation with Indian tribes (E.O.
13175).
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated this rule and
determined that it has no potential
effects on federally recognized Indian
tribes because OCS operations do not
take place on or near Indian lands.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
The PRA provides that an agency may
not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Until OMB approves a collection of
information and assigns a control
number, you are not required to
respond. The revisions to 30 CFR part
250 subpart A refer to, but do not
change, information collection
requirements in current regulations.
OMB has approved the referenced
information collection requirements
under OMB control number 1010–0114,
current expiration date of October 31,
2007. The final rule will impose no new
paperwork requirements, and an OMB
form 83–I submission to OMB under the
PRA is not required.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866 requires each
agency to write regulations that are easy
to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make this rule
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following:
(1) Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
(2) Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that interferes with
its clarity?
(3) Does the format of the rule
(grouping and order of sections, use of
headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or
reduce its clarity?
(4) Is the description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this preamble helpful in understanding
the rule? What else can we do to make
the rule easier to understand?
Send a copy of any comments that
concern how we could make this rule
easier to understand to: Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Department of the
Interior, Room 7229, 1849 C Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20240. You may
also e-mail the comments to this
address: Exsec@ios.doi.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969
MMS analyzed this rule using the
criteria of the NEPA and 516
Departmental Manual, Chapter 2, and
concluded that the preparation of an
environmental analysis is not required.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
This is not a significant rule and is
not subject to review by OMB under
Executive Order 13211. The final rule
may potentially increase energy
supplies, but given the uncertainty
associated with the drilling of
successful wells, the effect on energy
supply, distribution, or use is not
considered to be significant at this time.
Thus, a Statement of Energy Effects is
not required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 250
Continental shelf, Environmental
impact statements, Environmental
protection, Government contracts,
Investigations, Mineral royalties, Oil
and gas development and production,
Oil and gas exploration, Oil and gas
reserves, Penalties, Pipelines, Public
lands-mineral resources, Public lands—
right-of-way, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulphur
development and production, Sulphur
exploration, Surety bonds.
Dated: December 2, 2005.
Chad Calvert,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Land and
Minerals Management.
74663
(2) Before the end of the fifth year of
the primary term, you or your
predecessor in interest must have
acquired and interpreted geophysical
information that:
(i) Indicates that all or a portion of a
potential hydrocarbon-bearing
formation lies below 25,000 feet TVD
SS; and
(ii) Includes full 3–D depth migration
over the entire lease area.
(3) Before requesting the suspension,
you have conducted or are conducting
additional data processing or
interpretation of the geophysical
information with the objective of
identifying a potential hydrocarbonbearing geologic structure or
stratigraphic trap lying below 25,000
feet TVD SS.
(4) You demonstrate that additional
time is necessary to:
(i) Complete current processing or
interpretation of existing geophysical
data or information;
(ii) Acquire, process, or interpret new
geophysical or geological data or
information that would affect the
decision to drill the same geologic
structure or stratigraphic trap, as
determined by the Regional Supervisor,
identified in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3)
of this section; or
(iii) Drill a well below 25,000 feet
TVD SS into the geologic structure or
stratigraphic trap identified as a result
of the activities conducted in
paragraphs (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4)(i) and
(ii) of this section.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
MMS amends 30 CFR part 250 as
follows:
[FR Doc. 05–24109 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
PART 250—OIL AND GAS AND
SULPHUR OPERATIONS IN THE
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I
1. The authority citation for Part 250
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1331, et seq.
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 104, 105 and 160
[USCG–2004–19963]
I
2. In § 250.175, add a new paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
RIN 1625–AA93
§ 250.175 When may the Regional
Supervisor grant an SOO?
Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports;
Certain Dangerous Cargoes; Electronic
Submission
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Regional Supervisor may grant
an SOO to conduct additional geological
and geophysical data analysis that may
lead to the drilling of a well below
25,000 feet true vertical depth below the
datum at mean sea level (TVD SS) when
all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The lease was issued with a
primary lease term of:
(i) 5 years; or
(ii) 8 years with a requirement to drill
within 5 years.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Interim rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On August 18, 2004, the Coast
Guard published a temporary rule
entitled ‘‘Notification of Arrival in U.S.
Ports; Certain Dangerous Cargoes;
Electronic Submission.’’ 69 FR 51176.
This temporary rule, which expires
March 20, 2006, added ammonium
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
74664
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
nitrate and ammonium nitrate based
fertilizers, in bulk, and propylene oxide,
alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in
bulk, to the list of Certain Dangerous
Cargoes (CDCs) for which a notice of
arrival (NOA) is required.
The Coast Guard is now permanently
changing the definition of ‘‘certain
dangerous cargo’’ to include (1)
ammonium nitrate, in bulk; (2)
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk; and (3) propylene oxide, alone or
mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk.
This rule also adds an option for vessels
to submit notices of arrival
electronically. These changes are
necessary to promote maritime safety
and security and to facilitate the
uninterrupted flow of commerce by
providing the Coast Guard with
information on these cargoes.
DATES: This interim rule is effective
January 17, 2006. Comments and related
material must reach the Docket
Management Facility on or before March
16, 2006. Comments sent to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) on
collection of information must reach
OMB on or before March 16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG–2004–19963] to the
Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001.
(3) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL–401 on the
Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The telephone number is 202–366–
9329. This is not a toll free call.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
You must also mail comments on
collection of information to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
ATTN: Desk Officer, U.S. Coast Guard.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
ENS Joseph Azzata, Office of Port
Security Planning and Readiness (G–
MPP), Coast Guard, telephone 202–267–
0069. If you are interested in creating
your own application or modifying your
existing business systems to submit
Extensible Markup Language (XML)
formatted data to the National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC), please
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
contact the NVMC by e-mail at
sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at
1–800–708–9823 or 304–264–2502 for
more information. If you have questions
related to security plans, call LCDR Rob
McLellan, Office of Port and Vessel
Security (G–MPS), telephone (202) 267–
4129. This is not a toll free call. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402.
This is not a toll free call.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
II. Acronyms
III. Background and Purpose
IV. Discussion of Comments to the
Temporary Rule
A. Adding Propylene Oxide
B. CDC Residue
C. Beyond the Scope of This Rulemaking
V. Discussion of Rule
A. Temporary Rule Changes Adopted
B. Additional Changes
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
B. Regulatory Evaluation
C. Small Entities
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Collection of Information
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
H. Taking of Private Property
I. Civil Justice Reform
J. Protection of Children
K. Indian Tribal Governments
L. Energy Effects
M. Technical Standards
N. Environment
List of Subjects
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov
and will include any personal
information you have provided. We
have an agreement with the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to use the
Docket Management Facility. Please see
DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph below.
A. Submitting comments: If you
submit a comment, please include your
name and address, identify the docket
number for this rulemaking [USCG–
2004–19963], indicate the specific
section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason
for each comment. You may submit
your comments and material by
electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery
to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES; but
please submit your comments and
material by only one means. If you
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger
than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this interim rule in view of
them.
B. Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://dms.dot.gov at any time and
conduct a ‘‘simple search’’ using the last
five digits of the docket number. You
also may visit the Docket Management
Facility in room PL–401 on the Plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
C. Public meeting: We do not now
plan to hold a public meeting. However,
you may submit a request for one to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that a public meeting would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at
a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
D. Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
II. Acronyms
CDC Certain Dangerous Cargo
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COI Collection of Information
CTAC Chemical Transportation
Advisory Committee
DHS U.S. Department of Homeland
Security
eNOAD Electronic Notice of Arrival
and Departure
FR Federal Register
G–MPP USCG Office of Port Security
Planning and Readiness
G–MPS USCG Office of Port and
Vessel Security
IR Interim Rule
MTSA Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002
NOA Notice of Arrival
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NVMC National Vessel Movement
Center
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
OMB Office of Management and
Budget
POX Propylene Oxide
PV Present Value
TSAC Towing Safety Advisory
Committee
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
XML Extensible Markup Language
III. Background and Purpose
On August 18, 2004, the Coast Guard
published a temporary rule entitled
‘‘Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports;
Certain Dangerous Cargoes; Electronic
Submission.’’ 69 FR 51176. This
temporary rule, which expires March
20, 2006, added ammonium nitrate and
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk, and propylene oxide, alone or
mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk, to
the list of Certain Dangerous Cargoes
(CDCs) for which a notice of arrival
(NOA) is required under 33 CFR part
160.
CDCs are specifically defined in 33
CFR 160.204, but may generally be
described as substances or materials that
pose an unreasonable risk to health,
safety, and property if improperly
handled. The notice of arrival is the
process in which a vessel submits
required information—including data
about the vessel, cargo, crew and others
on board before the vessel arrives at a
port or place in the United States. The
required information contained in the
notice of arrival allows the Coast Guard
to properly screen the vessel for safety
and security purposes.
The temporary rule was issued in
large part because of information the
Coast Guard had received from other
federal agencies in late 2003 on the
dangers of ammonium nitrate and
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk. While considering adding these
cargoes to the CDC list, the Coast Guard
requested comments from the Towing
Safety Advisory Committee (TSAC) and
the Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee (CTAC). Those committees
were asked to advise the Coast Guard on
the anticipated impact to their
respective industries if solid ammonium
nitrate and ammonium nitrate
fertilizers, in bulk, were added to the
CDC definition in 33 CFR part 160. The
Coast Guard received recommendations
from TSAC on September 10, 2003, and
from CTAC on October 23, 2003.
Neither committee specifically
recommended adding forms of
ammonium nitrate to the CDC list. Both
committees acknowledged, however, the
security hazards associated with forms
of ammonium nitrate and agreed that
additional security measures were
warranted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
The temporary rule also added
propylene oxide, alone or mixed with
ethylene oxide, in bulk, to the list of
CDCs for the following reasons—
• It is chemically similar to ethylene
oxide, which is already on the list of
CDCs;
• It is extremely reactive to acids,
bases, oxidizers, peroxides, and many
other chemicals;
• When exposed to heat, it
polymerizes, or reacts with itself, and
gives off large amounts of heat;
• It has a wide flammability range,
meaning that it can mix with air to form
an explosive mixture at low (2.3
percent) or high (37 percent)
concentrations; and,
• It has a high vapor pressure,
meaning that it generates large amounts
of flammable and reactive vapor at room
temperature.
The temporary rule also provided one
new option, consisting of two separate
formats, for electronically submitting an
NOA to the Coast Guard’s National
Vessel Movement Center (NVMC).
Finally, the temporary rule clarified that
vessel security regulations in 33 CFR
part 104 apply to the owner or operator
of any (1) barge carrying CDC in bulk or
(2) barge subject to 46 CFR chapter I,
subchapter I, that is engaged on an
international voyage.
IV. Discussion of Comments to the
Temporary Rule
The Coast Guard received four letters
commenting on the temporary rule. The
letters were from a national trade
association, an advisory committee, a
barge transportation company, and a
science and technology company. All of
the comments addressed issues relating
to CDC generally. There were no
comments addressing electronic
submission of NOAs.
A. Adding Propylene Oxide: One
commenter agreed with the addition of
propylene oxide to the list of CDCs,
stating ‘‘The addition of Propylene
Oxide (POX) as a Certain Dangerous
Cargo is an appropriate action, as it is
a high risk cargo by any measurement.’’
B. CDC Residue: One comment
discussed CDC liquid residue (‘‘slops’’)
remaining on a vessel after the CDC has
been discharged from the vessel. The
comment stated that vessels carrying
only small quantities of CDC liquid
residue are still subject to NOA
reporting requirements until that
material is discharged from the vessel.
As an example, it stated that the Coast
Guard classifies a vessel that has carried
a liquid CDC as a CDC vessel until it is
totally free from dangerous
concentrations of flammable or toxic
gases (‘‘gas free’’). It also stated, ‘‘as a
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74665
result, both the Coast Guard and
industry are forced to utilize time,
money, and resources to implement the
additional requirements even when no
particular hazard exists.’’
The Coast Guard disagrees with the
commenter’s assertion that residue from
liquid CDCs present no particular
hazard. The residue of bulk liquid and
bulk liquefied gas CDCs continues to
retain its physical properties of
flammability and toxicity despite the
reduction in quantity of the CDC, and
these physical properties are what make
certain cargoes CDCs. Therefore, this
rule does not modify current
requirements for bulk liquid and bulk
liquefied gas CDCs, regardless of
amount.
However, the Coast Guard agrees that
some non-liquid residues should not be
included in the definition of CDC. Coast
Guard discussed with the Office of
Naval Intelligence and the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, the safety and security
concerns related to the residue of
ammonium nitrate and the residue of
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk. We conclude that it is not
necessary to require an NOA when a
vessel is carrying only residue of
ammonium nitrate or residue of
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk, under certain circumstances. For
example, a barge carrying dry bulk
ammonium nitrate delivers to, and
discharges its cargo at, a facility. Small
quantities of residue may remain
scattered around the edges and the rest
of the floor area of the barge. In this
instance, the Coast Guard agrees that it
would be unnecessary for a company to
clean all residue from the barge
completely so that the Part 160
requirements no longer apply to that
barge.
C. Beyond the Scope of this
Rulemaking: All four commenters raised
a number of issues that were outside the
narrow scope of the temporary rule.
Those issues generally relate to
implementation of the vessel and
facility security regulations in 33 CFR
parts 104 and 105. The issues included
concerns about segregation of barges
carrying ammonium nitrate or
ammonium nitrate fertilizers from other
dry cargo barges at fleeting facilities—a
commercial area for the making up,
breaking down, or staging of barge tows;
requests to make the Inland River Vessel
Movement Center and NVMC reporting
requirements the same; suggestions to
allow vessel operators to ‘‘turn on’’ and
‘‘turn off’’ the vessel security plans of
uninspected barges depending on
whether they are carrying CDCs; and
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
74666
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
storage of security plan documentation
onboard dry cargo barges.
Because the only purpose of this
rulemaking is to make permanent the
changes from the temporary rule with
minor modifications, the
aforementioned issues are not within
the narrow scope of this rulemaking and
we do not address them in this rule.
However, we have forwarded these
comments to the appropriate program
staff for further consideration and
appropriate action.
In addition, these comments asked
questions about when and how owners
and operators with approved security
plans or Alternative Security Plans
should proceed with security plan
changes relating to the new CDCs as
well as questions about completing the
required Declarations of Security. Such
questions should be addressed to LCDR
Rob McLellan, G–MPS, Coast Guard,
202–267–4129.
V. Discussion of Rule
A. Temporary Rule Changes Adopted
This interim rule makes permanent
the changes to 33 CFR parts 104 and 160
introduced by the August 18, 2004
temporary rule. These permanent
changes are necessary to promote
maritime safety and security and to
facilitate the uninterrupted flow of
commerce. This rule permanently adds
to the definition of CDC, in 33 CFR
160.204, ammonium nitrate and
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk, and propylene oxide, alone or
mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk.
This interim rule also makes
permanent one new option, consisting
of two separate formats, for
electronically submitting a NOA to the
Coast Guard’s National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC). Finally, this
rule adopts the change the temporary
rule made to the applicability of vessel
security regulations in 33 CFR part 104,
which limited applicability to barges
that are carrying CDC in bulk to those
engaged on international voyages.
B. Additional Changes
This interim rule also contains
editorial revisions and clarifications to
the NOA regulation that are not in the
temporary rule. One of the changes is a
revision to the definition of certain
dangerous cargo which eliminates the
reporting requirement for vessels that
retain only a non-liquid residue of
ammonium nitrate or ammonium nitrate
based fertilizer, in bulk. The second
change is that this rule adds an option
for vessels to submit notices of arrival
electronically. The third change is only
an editorial clarification that has no
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
substantive effect, clarifying that U.S.
recreational vessels are not subject to
part 160 requirements.
This interim rule defines ammonium
nitrate and ammonium nitrate based
fertilizers, in bulk, to exclude nonliquid residue of ammonium nitrate and
residue of ammonium nitrate based
fertilizer after discharging saleable
cargo. The definition for ‘‘Certain
dangerous cargo residue (CDC residue)’’
in § 160.204 now excludes from the
NOA reporting requirements
ammonium nitrate, in bulk, and
ammonium nitrate based fertilizer, in
bulk, remaining after all saleable cargo
is discharged, not exceeding 1,000
pounds in total and not individually
accumulated in quantities exceeding
two cubic feet.
This interim rule updates the
electronic submission options by adding
the new eNOAD Microsoft InfoPath
template as another electronic
submission format. This rule also
permanently adds an optional method,
the Electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure (eNOAD) system, for
electronically submitting a NOA to the
Coast Guard’s NVMC. On January 31,
2005, the Coast Guard replaced its
electronic NOA (e-NOA) system with
the newer eNOAD system. The new
eNOAD has Microsoft InfoPath as a
third optional electronic format for
submittal. The Coast Guard has worked
with the Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) in developing the
eNOAD so that it may be used to meet
both the Coast Guard’s notice of arrival
requirements and CBP’s Sea Advance
Passenger Information System (APIS)
requirements. This will eliminate
duplicative reporting. On April 7, 2005,
CBP published a final rule concerning
the use of eNOAD. 70 FR 17819.
The eNOAD system, available on the
NVMC Web site at https://
www.nvmc.uscg.gov, consists of the
following three submission formats:
1. An online web format that can be
used to submit NOA information
directly to the NVMC;
2. Raw Extensible Markup Language
(XML) formatted documents that
conform to the eNOAD schema,
provided for those interested in creating
their own application. This format
would allow offline data input and
would allow users to draw information
from their existing systems to submit,
via web service, XML formatted data to
comply with NOA requirements; and
3. A new Microsoft InfoPath template,
designed for those wanting to input
NOA data offline (when not connected
to the Internet) for submission later via
their Internet connection or as an e-mail
attachment to the NVMC.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For more information on any of these
formats, please contact the NVMC at
sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at
1–800–708–9823 or 304–264–2502, or
visit the NVMC Web site listed above
and click on ‘‘FAQ’’ or ‘‘Downloads.’’
The rule clarifies that the notice of
arrival provisions in part 160 do not
apply to U.S. recreational vessels. Based
on queries from industry and local
USCG assets, we have revised the
language to clearly state that part 160
does not apply to U.S. recreational
vessels under 46 U.S.C 4301. However,
this part does apply to foreign
recreational vessels. This change does
not substantively alter the scope of the
applicability in part 160.
Finally, this interim rule also removes
the temporary provisions that are in
parts 104 and 105 that are no longer
needed. The paragraphs being removed
are § 104.115(d), § 104.410(g),
§ 105.115(c), and § 105.410(g).
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Implementation of this rule as an
interim rule is based upon the ‘‘good
cause’’ exception found under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) at
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Delaying
implementation of this rule to await
public notice and comment is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest.
This interim rule adopts changes
made by the temporary rule. There was
a 90-day post-promulgation comment
period for that temporary rule and the
Coast Guard received only four
comments. The Coast Guard considered
those comments when drafting this
interim rule and addressed them above.
In addition to adopting changes
introduced by the temporary rule that
were subject to notice and comment,
this interim rule makes only three
changes: one change relieves a burden,
another clarifies that the rule does not
apply to certain vessels, and the third
offers an additional option for
submitting a notice of arrival. These
changes either have no effect on the
public, or ease a public burden by
relaxing the regulatory requirement or
providing more options in the reporting
requirement. For these reasons, the
Coast Guard finds good cause to publish
this interim rule without first
publishing an NPRM.
Although we have good cause to
publish this rule without prior notice
and comment, we value public
comments. As a result, we are soliciting
public comments on this interim rule
and may revise the final rule in
response to those comments.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
B. Regulatory Evaluation
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ 58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993, requires a
determination whether a regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
subject to the requirements of the
Executive Order. This rule has been
identified as significant under Executive
Order 12866 and has been reviewed by
OMB. A Regulatory Assessment is
available in the docket as indicated
under the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ section of this
preamble. A summary of the analysis
follows.
As in the temporary rule, the two cost
elements in the interim rule are the
NOA requirements and the vessel and
facility security requirements associated
with the Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (‘‘MTSA’’, Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064). Vessels
that transport CDC materials already are
required to submit NOAs to the Coast
Guard. 33 CFR 160.202 and 160.212.
Vessels and facilities that carry and
handle CDC materials are required to
implement security measures to comply
with MTSA regulations (Vessel Security
Plans, 33 CFR part 104; Facility Security
Plans, 33 CFR part 105).
For our analysis of the costs of this
interim rule, we have retained the
estimate from the Regulatory
Assessment conducted for the August
2004 temporary rule of about 9,200
barges that can potentially transport
ammonium nitrate and propylene oxide.
In addition, we retained from the same
Regulatory Assessment an estimate of 50
as the average number of fleeting
facilities that can potentially receive
these two cargoes and the estimate of
approximately 11,400 port calls made
by about 2,220 vessels that can
potentially carry CDC materials.
74667
The initial cost of the interim rule for
the NOA and the security requirements
is approximately $6.8 million (nondiscounted), which covers the
preparation of NOAs, the security
requirements for vessels and facilities,
and the installation, operation and
maintenance of equipment that may be
required to upgrade facility security.
The annual cost of the interim rule for
the NOA and the security requirements
is approximately $4.9 million (nondiscounted).
We estimate the discounted total cost
of the interim rule to vessel owners and
facilities to range from $38.9 million to
$45.1 million (2005–2014, seven percent
and three percent discount rates,
respectively). We estimate that fleeting
facilities will incur approximately 88
percent of the discounted total cost
($34.3 to $39.8 million). Table 1
presents the discounted total cost of the
interim rule by element of compliance.
TABLE 1.—SUMMARY OF DISCOUNTED COSTS OF INTERIM RULE FOR NOA AND FACILITY AND VESSEL SECURITY
REQUIREMENTS (2005–2014, THREE AND SEVEN PERCENT DISCOUNT RATES)
[Cost by Element* ($ Millions)]
Vessels not
previously in
NOA submittals
Increase
Seven Percent Discount Rate .................................................................
Three Percent Discount Rate ..................................................................
* Totals
Covered by
NOA
$0.062
0.072
$0.35
0.41
Vessel
security
$4.1
4.8
Facility
security
$34.3
39.8
Total PV
cost of IR
$38.9
45.1
may not sum due to rounding.
As shown in Table 1, using the seven
percent discount rate, we estimate the
cost associated with the increase in
NOA submittals for vessels that only
carry ammonium nitrate or propylene
oxide to be $0.35 million of the total
discounted cost of this interim rule. The
cost associated with the vessel and
facility security requirements is $38.4
million at a seven percent discount rate
($4.1 for vessel security + $34.3 for
facility security). Using three percent as
the discount rate, we estimated the cost
associated with an increase in NOA
submittals for vessels that only carry
ammonium nitrate or propylene oxide
to be $0.41 million, and the cost
associated with the vessel and facility
security requirements is $44.6 million
($4.8 for vessel security + $39.8 for
facility security).
The qualitative benefits in this
interim rule are security-related. By
adding ammonium nitrate and
propylene oxide to the list of CDCs,
society will benefit, as the whereabouts
of these two dangerous cargoes are
tracked and become known.
Furthermore, the revision of the CDC
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
definition to include ammonium nitrate
and propylene oxide, will provide
relevant information about an
applicable vessel’s cargo and the threat
that cargo may pose.
This interim rule will provide
security standards for fleeting facilities
that handle these two dangerous
cargoes. These security standards will
increase awareness, communication,
and surveillance to reduce the
likelihood of theft and unlawful access
to fleeting facilities that handle these
volatile and dangerous cargoes.
Lastly, this interim rule will allow the
Coast Guard to provide greater
flexibility for NOA submissions by
allowing vessel owners and operators
three additional electronic means of
NOA submittal.
C. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This
rule does not require a general notice of
proposed rulemaking and, therefore, is
exempt from the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Although
this rule is exempt, we have reviewed
it for potential economic impacts on
small entities.
We expect that this interim rule may
have an economic impact on some small
entities, as defined by the Small
Business Administration. Small entities
affected by this rule fall into two groups:
(1) Those small entities that currently
carry or handle CDCs in addition to
ammonium nitrate and ammonium
nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk, and
propylene oxide, alone or mixed with
ethylene oxide, in bulk; and (2) those
small entities that currently carry or
handle only ammonium nitrate and
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers in
bulk, and propylene oxide, alone or
mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
74668
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Small entities in the first category
currently submit NOAs and comply
with the security measures and
planning requirements. These entities
will have to submit a greater number of
NOAs for the newly covered cargoes.
They may have to revise existing
security plans and change security
measures to cover these cargoes.
Small entities in the second category
were affected for the first time by the
temporary rule and will continue to
comply with NOA requirements in 33
CFR part 160 for shipments of these
cargoes and with the security measures
and planning requirements in 33 CFR
parts 104 and 105.
The Coast Guard is particularly
interested in the impact of this rule on
small entities. If you are a small entity,
we specifically request comments
regarding the economic impact of this
rule on you.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking. If you
think this interim rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please consult
ENS Joseph Azzata, Office of Port
Security Planning and Readiness (G–
MPP), Coast Guard, telephone 202–267–
0069. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
E. Collection of Information
This interim rule does not require a
new collection of information (COI) or
change to the two existing OMBapproved collections, 1625–0100 and
1625–0077. The current approval for
1625–0100 expires on March 31, 2008.
The approval for 1625–0077 expires July
31, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Coast Guard certifies
that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their discretionary regulatory
actions. In particular, the Act addresses
actions that may result in the
expenditure by a State, local, or tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year. UMRA does not require
an assessment in the case of an interim
rule issued without prior notice and
comment. Nevertheless, the Coast Guard
does not expect this interim rule to
result in such an expenditure. We
discuss this interim rule’s effects
elsewhere in this preamble.
H. Taking of Private Property
This interim rule will not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
I. Civil Justice Reform
This interim rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
J. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this interim rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This interim rule is not an
economically significant rule and does
not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
K. Indian Tribal Governments
This interim rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
L. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this interim rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that Order.
Although it is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866, it
is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under
Executive Order 13211.
M. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This interim rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
N. Environment
We have analyzed this interim rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraphs (34)(a) and (d), of the
Instruction from further environmental
documentation. An ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ is available in
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 241 / Friday, December 16, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
§ 105.410
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
[Amended]
7. In § 105.410, remove temporary
paragraph (g).
I
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 104
PART 160—PORTS AND WATERWAYS
SAFETY-GENERAL
Maritime security, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security
measures, Vessels.
8. The authority citation for part 160
is revised to read as follows:
I
33 CFR Part 105
Maritime security, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security
measures.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1. Subpart C is
also issued under the authority of 33 U.S.C.
1225 and 46 U.S.C. 3715.
33 CFR Part 160
I
Administrative practice and
procedure; Harbors; Hazardous
materials transportation; Marine safety;
Navigation (water); Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Vessels;
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 104, 105, and 160 as follows:
PART 104—MARITIME SECURITY:
VESSELS
1. The authority citation for part 104
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1,
6.04–11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. In § 104.105, remove temporary
paragraph (a)(12); reinstate temporarily
suspended paragraph (a)(9); and revise
paragraph (a)(9) to read as follows:
I
9. In § 160.202, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 160.202
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) This subpart does not apply to
U.S. recreational vessels under 46
U.S.C. 4301 et seq., but does apply to
foreign recreational vessels.
*
*
*
*
*
I 10. In § 160.204, in the definition for
‘‘Certain dangerous cargo (CDC)’’,
remove temporary paragraphs (9) and
(10); in the definition for ‘‘Certain
dangerous cargo (CDC)’’, add new
paragraphs (8)(ix) and (9); and add a
new definition for ‘‘Certain dangerous
cargo residue (CDC residue)’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 160.204
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Certain dangerous cargo (CDC)
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
70103; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–
11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
*
*
*
*
(8) The following bulk liquids:
*
*
*
*
*
(ix) Propylene oxide, alone or mixed
with ethylene oxide.
(9) The following bulk solids:
(i) Ammonium nitrate listed as a
Division 5.1 (oxidizing) material in 49
CFR 172.101 that is not certain
dangerous cargo residue (CDC residue).
(ii) Ammonium nitrate based fertilizer
listed as a Division 5.1 (oxidizing)
material in 49 CFR 172.101 that is not
CDC residue.
Certain dangerous cargo residue (CDC
residue) means ammonium nitrate in
bulk or ammonium nitrate based
fertilizer in bulk remaining after all
saleable cargo is discharged, not
exceeding 1,000 pounds in total and not
individually accumulated in quantities
exceeding two cubic feet.
*
*
*
*
*
I 11. In § 160.210, remove temporary
paragraph (e), reinstate temporarily
suspended paragraph (a) and revise
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 105.115
§ 160.210
§ 104.105
Applicability.
(a) * * *
(9) Barge carrying certain dangerous
cargo in bulk or barge that is subject to
46 CFR Chapter I, subchapter I, that is
engaged on an international voyage.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 104.115
[Amended]
3. In § 104.115, remove temporary
paragraph (d).
I
§ 104.410
[Amended]
4. In § 104.410, remove temporary
paragraph (g).
I
PART 105—MARITIME SECURITY:
FACILITIES
5. The authority citation for part 105
continues to read as follows:
I
[Amended]
6. In § 105.115, remove temporary
paragraph (c).
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:21 Dec 15, 2005
Jkt 208001
74669
provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section, vessels must submit NOA
information required by § 160.206
(entries 1 through 9 in Table 160.206) to
the NVMC, United States Coast Guard,
408 Coast Guard Drive, Kearneysville,
WV 25430, by:
(1) Electronic submission via the
electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure (eNOAD) and consisting of
the following three formats:
(i) A Web site that can be used to
submit NOA information directly to the
NVMC, accessible from the NVMC web
site at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov;
(ii) Electronic submission of
Extensible Markup Language (XML)
formatted documents via web service;
(iii) Electronic submission via
Microsoft InfoPath; contact the NVMC at
sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at
1–800–708–9823 or 304–264–2502 for
more information;
(2) E-mail at sans@nvmc.uscg.gov.
Workbook available at https://
www.nvmc.uscg.gov;
(3) Fax at 1–800–547–8724 or 304–
264–2684. Workbook available at https://
www.nvmc.uscg.gov; or,
(4) Telephone at 1–800–708–9823 or
304–264–2502.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 8, 2005.
Thomas H. Collins,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.
[FR Doc. 05–24126 Filed 12–15–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
*
Methods for submitting an NOA.
(a) Submission to the National Vessel
Movement Center (NVMC). Except as
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 151 and 153
46 CFR Part 4
[USCG–2000–6927]
RIN 1625–AA04 (Formerly RIN 2115–AD98)
Reporting Marine Casualties
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
its regulations governing marine
casualty reporting requirements by
adding ‘‘significant harm to the
environment’’ as a reportable marine
casualty, and by requiring certain
foreign flag vessels, such as oil tankers,
to report marine casualties that occur in
waters subject to U.S. jurisdiction, but
beyond U.S. navigable waters, when
those casualties involve material
damage affecting the seaworthiness or
efficiency of the vessel, or significant
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 241 (Friday, December 16, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74663-74669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-24126]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 104, 105 and 160
[USCG-2004-19963]
RIN 1625-AA93
Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports; Certain Dangerous Cargoes;
Electronic Submission
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Interim rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On August 18, 2004, the Coast Guard published a temporary rule
entitled ``Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports; Certain Dangerous
Cargoes; Electronic Submission.'' 69 FR 51176. This temporary rule,
which expires March 20, 2006, added ammonium
[[Page 74664]]
nitrate and ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk, and propylene
oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk, to the list of
Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDCs) for which a notice of arrival (NOA) is
required.
The Coast Guard is now permanently changing the definition of
``certain dangerous cargo'' to include (1) ammonium nitrate, in bulk;
(2) ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk; and (3) propylene
oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk. This rule also adds
an option for vessels to submit notices of arrival electronically.
These changes are necessary to promote maritime safety and security and
to facilitate the uninterrupted flow of commerce by providing the Coast
Guard with information on these cargoes.
DATES: This interim rule is effective January 17, 2006. Comments and
related material must reach the Docket Management Facility on or before
March 16, 2006. Comments sent to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) on collection of information must reach OMB on or before March
16, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2004-19963] to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Web site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329. This is not a toll free call.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
You must also mail comments on collection of information to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk Officer,
U.S. Coast Guard.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call ENS Joseph Azzata, Office of Port Security Planning and Readiness
(G-MPP), Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0069. If you are interested in
creating your own application or modifying your existing business
systems to submit Extensible Markup Language (XML) formatted data to
the National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC), please contact the NVMC by
e-mail at sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at 1-800-708-9823 or 304-
264-2502 for more information. If you have questions related to
security plans, call LCDR Rob McLellan, Office of Port and Vessel
Security (G-MPS), telephone (202) 267-4129. This is not a toll free
call. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-493-0402. This is not a toll free call.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
II. Acronyms
III. Background and Purpose
IV. Discussion of Comments to the Temporary Rule
A. Adding Propylene Oxide
B. CDC Residue
C. Beyond the Scope of This Rulemaking
V. Discussion of Rule
A. Temporary Rule Changes Adopted
B. Additional Changes
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
B. Regulatory Evaluation
C. Small Entities
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Collection of Information
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
H. Taking of Private Property
I. Civil Justice Reform
J. Protection of Children
K. Indian Tribal Governments
L. Energy Effects
M. Technical Standards
N. Environment
List of Subjects
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov and will include any personal
information you have provided. We have an agreement with the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management Facility. Please
see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
A. Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include
your name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking
[USCG-2004-19963], indicate the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You
may submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this interim
rule in view of them.
B. Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time and conduct a ``simple search''
using the last five digits of the docket number. You also may visit the
Docket Management Facility in room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
C. Public meeting: We do not now plan to hold a public meeting.
However, you may submit a request for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that a public meeting would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
D. Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
II. Acronyms
CDC Certain Dangerous Cargo
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COI Collection of Information
CTAC Chemical Transportation Advisory Committee
DHS U.S. Department of Homeland Security
eNOAD Electronic Notice of Arrival and Departure
FR Federal Register
G-MPP USCG Office of Port Security Planning and Readiness
G-MPS USCG Office of Port and Vessel Security
IR Interim Rule
MTSA Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002
NOA Notice of Arrival
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NVMC National Vessel Movement Center
[[Page 74665]]
OMB Office of Management and Budget
POX Propylene Oxide
PV Present Value
TSAC Towing Safety Advisory Committee
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
XML Extensible Markup Language
III. Background and Purpose
On August 18, 2004, the Coast Guard published a temporary rule
entitled ``Notification of Arrival in U.S. Ports; Certain Dangerous
Cargoes; Electronic Submission.'' 69 FR 51176. This temporary rule,
which expires March 20, 2006, added ammonium nitrate and ammonium
nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk, and propylene oxide, alone or mixed
with ethylene oxide, in bulk, to the list of Certain Dangerous Cargoes
(CDCs) for which a notice of arrival (NOA) is required under 33 CFR
part 160.
CDCs are specifically defined in 33 CFR 160.204, but may generally
be described as substances or materials that pose an unreasonable risk
to health, safety, and property if improperly handled. The notice of
arrival is the process in which a vessel submits required information--
including data about the vessel, cargo, crew and others on board before
the vessel arrives at a port or place in the United States. The
required information contained in the notice of arrival allows the
Coast Guard to properly screen the vessel for safety and security
purposes.
The temporary rule was issued in large part because of information
the Coast Guard had received from other federal agencies in late 2003
on the dangers of ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate based
fertilizers, in bulk. While considering adding these cargoes to the CDC
list, the Coast Guard requested comments from the Towing Safety
Advisory Committee (TSAC) and the Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee (CTAC). Those committees were asked to advise the Coast Guard
on the anticipated impact to their respective industries if solid
ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate fertilizers, in bulk, were added
to the CDC definition in 33 CFR part 160. The Coast Guard received
recommendations from TSAC on September 10, 2003, and from CTAC on
October 23, 2003. Neither committee specifically recommended adding
forms of ammonium nitrate to the CDC list. Both committees
acknowledged, however, the security hazards associated with forms of
ammonium nitrate and agreed that additional security measures were
warranted.
The temporary rule also added propylene oxide, alone or mixed with
ethylene oxide, in bulk, to the list of CDCs for the following
reasons--
It is chemically similar to ethylene oxide, which is
already on the list of CDCs;
It is extremely reactive to acids, bases, oxidizers,
peroxides, and many other chemicals;
When exposed to heat, it polymerizes, or reacts with
itself, and gives off large amounts of heat;
It has a wide flammability range, meaning that it can mix
with air to form an explosive mixture at low (2.3 percent) or high (37
percent) concentrations; and,
It has a high vapor pressure, meaning that it generates
large amounts of flammable and reactive vapor at room temperature.
The temporary rule also provided one new option, consisting of two
separate formats, for electronically submitting an NOA to the Coast
Guard's National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC). Finally, the temporary
rule clarified that vessel security regulations in 33 CFR part 104
apply to the owner or operator of any (1) barge carrying CDC in bulk or
(2) barge subject to 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter I, that is engaged on
an international voyage.
IV. Discussion of Comments to the Temporary Rule
The Coast Guard received four letters commenting on the temporary
rule. The letters were from a national trade association, an advisory
committee, a barge transportation company, and a science and technology
company. All of the comments addressed issues relating to CDC
generally. There were no comments addressing electronic submission of
NOAs.
A. Adding Propylene Oxide: One commenter agreed with the addition
of propylene oxide to the list of CDCs, stating ``The addition of
Propylene Oxide (POX) as a Certain Dangerous Cargo is an appropriate
action, as it is a high risk cargo by any measurement.''
B. CDC Residue: One comment discussed CDC liquid residue
(``slops'') remaining on a vessel after the CDC has been discharged
from the vessel. The comment stated that vessels carrying only small
quantities of CDC liquid residue are still subject to NOA reporting
requirements until that material is discharged from the vessel. As an
example, it stated that the Coast Guard classifies a vessel that has
carried a liquid CDC as a CDC vessel until it is totally free from
dangerous concentrations of flammable or toxic gases (``gas free''). It
also stated, ``as a result, both the Coast Guard and industry are
forced to utilize time, money, and resources to implement the
additional requirements even when no particular hazard exists.''
The Coast Guard disagrees with the commenter's assertion that
residue from liquid CDCs present no particular hazard. The residue of
bulk liquid and bulk liquefied gas CDCs continues to retain its
physical properties of flammability and toxicity despite the reduction
in quantity of the CDC, and these physical properties are what make
certain cargoes CDCs. Therefore, this rule does not modify current
requirements for bulk liquid and bulk liquefied gas CDCs, regardless of
amount.
However, the Coast Guard agrees that some non-liquid residues
should not be included in the definition of CDC. Coast Guard discussed
with the Office of Naval Intelligence and the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the safety and security concerns
related to the residue of ammonium nitrate and the residue of ammonium
nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk. We conclude that it is not
necessary to require an NOA when a vessel is carrying only residue of
ammonium nitrate or residue of ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in
bulk, under certain circumstances. For example, a barge carrying dry
bulk ammonium nitrate delivers to, and discharges its cargo at, a
facility. Small quantities of residue may remain scattered around the
edges and the rest of the floor area of the barge. In this instance,
the Coast Guard agrees that it would be unnecessary for a company to
clean all residue from the barge completely so that the Part 160
requirements no longer apply to that barge.
C. Beyond the Scope of this Rulemaking: All four commenters raised
a number of issues that were outside the narrow scope of the temporary
rule. Those issues generally relate to implementation of the vessel and
facility security regulations in 33 CFR parts 104 and 105. The issues
included concerns about segregation of barges carrying ammonium nitrate
or ammonium nitrate fertilizers from other dry cargo barges at fleeting
facilities--a commercial area for the making up, breaking down, or
staging of barge tows; requests to make the Inland River Vessel
Movement Center and NVMC reporting requirements the same; suggestions
to allow vessel operators to ``turn on'' and ``turn off'' the vessel
security plans of uninspected barges depending on whether they are
carrying CDCs; and
[[Page 74666]]
storage of security plan documentation onboard dry cargo barges.
Because the only purpose of this rulemaking is to make permanent
the changes from the temporary rule with minor modifications, the
aforementioned issues are not within the narrow scope of this
rulemaking and we do not address them in this rule. However, we have
forwarded these comments to the appropriate program staff for further
consideration and appropriate action.
In addition, these comments asked questions about when and how
owners and operators with approved security plans or Alternative
Security Plans should proceed with security plan changes relating to
the new CDCs as well as questions about completing the required
Declarations of Security. Such questions should be addressed to LCDR
Rob McLellan, G-MPS, Coast Guard, 202-267-4129.
V. Discussion of Rule
A. Temporary Rule Changes Adopted
This interim rule makes permanent the changes to 33 CFR parts 104
and 160 introduced by the August 18, 2004 temporary rule. These
permanent changes are necessary to promote maritime safety and security
and to facilitate the uninterrupted flow of commerce. This rule
permanently adds to the definition of CDC, in 33 CFR 160.204, ammonium
nitrate and ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk, and propylene
oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk.
This interim rule also makes permanent one new option, consisting
of two separate formats, for electronically submitting a NOA to the
Coast Guard's National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC). Finally, this
rule adopts the change the temporary rule made to the applicability of
vessel security regulations in 33 CFR part 104, which limited
applicability to barges that are carrying CDC in bulk to those engaged
on international voyages.
B. Additional Changes
This interim rule also contains editorial revisions and
clarifications to the NOA regulation that are not in the temporary
rule. One of the changes is a revision to the definition of certain
dangerous cargo which eliminates the reporting requirement for vessels
that retain only a non-liquid residue of ammonium nitrate or ammonium
nitrate based fertilizer, in bulk. The second change is that this rule
adds an option for vessels to submit notices of arrival electronically.
The third change is only an editorial clarification that has no
substantive effect, clarifying that U.S. recreational vessels are not
subject to part 160 requirements.
This interim rule defines ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate
based fertilizers, in bulk, to exclude non-liquid residue of ammonium
nitrate and residue of ammonium nitrate based fertilizer after
discharging saleable cargo. The definition for ``Certain dangerous
cargo residue (CDC residue)'' in Sec. 160.204 now excludes from the
NOA reporting requirements ammonium nitrate, in bulk, and ammonium
nitrate based fertilizer, in bulk, remaining after all saleable cargo
is discharged, not exceeding 1,000 pounds in total and not individually
accumulated in quantities exceeding two cubic feet.
This interim rule updates the electronic submission options by
adding the new eNOAD Microsoft InfoPath template as another electronic
submission format. This rule also permanently adds an optional method,
the Electronic Notice of Arrival and Departure (eNOAD) system, for
electronically submitting a NOA to the Coast Guard's NVMC. On January
31, 2005, the Coast Guard replaced its electronic NOA (e-NOA) system
with the newer eNOAD system. The new eNOAD has Microsoft InfoPath as a
third optional electronic format for submittal. The Coast Guard has
worked with the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in
developing the eNOAD so that it may be used to meet both the Coast
Guard's notice of arrival requirements and CBP's Sea Advance Passenger
Information System (APIS) requirements. This will eliminate duplicative
reporting. On April 7, 2005, CBP published a final rule concerning the
use of eNOAD. 70 FR 17819.
The eNOAD system, available on the NVMC Web site at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov, consists of the following three submission formats:
1. An online web format that can be used to submit NOA information
directly to the NVMC;
2. Raw Extensible Markup Language (XML) formatted documents that
conform to the eNOAD schema, provided for those interested in creating
their own application. This format would allow offline data input and
would allow users to draw information from their existing systems to
submit, via web service, XML formatted data to comply with NOA
requirements; and
3. A new Microsoft InfoPath template, designed for those wanting to
input NOA data offline (when not connected to the Internet) for
submission later via their Internet connection or as an e-mail
attachment to the NVMC.
For more information on any of these formats, please contact the
NVMC at sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at 1-800-708-9823 or 304-
264-2502, or visit the NVMC Web site listed above and click on ``FAQ''
or ``Downloads.''
The rule clarifies that the notice of arrival provisions in part
160 do not apply to U.S. recreational vessels. Based on queries from
industry and local USCG assets, we have revised the language to clearly
state that part 160 does not apply to U.S. recreational vessels under
46 U.S.C 4301. However, this part does apply to foreign recreational
vessels. This change does not substantively alter the scope of the
applicability in part 160.
Finally, this interim rule also removes the temporary provisions
that are in parts 104 and 105 that are no longer needed. The paragraphs
being removed are Sec. 104.115(d), Sec. 104.410(g), Sec. 105.115(c),
and Sec. 105.410(g).
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Implementation of this rule as an interim rule is based upon the
``good cause'' exception found under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Delaying implementation of this rule to
await public notice and comment is unnecessary and contrary to the
public interest.
This interim rule adopts changes made by the temporary rule. There
was a 90-day post-promulgation comment period for that temporary rule
and the Coast Guard received only four comments. The Coast Guard
considered those comments when drafting this interim rule and addressed
them above.
In addition to adopting changes introduced by the temporary rule
that were subject to notice and comment, this interim rule makes only
three changes: one change relieves a burden, another clarifies that the
rule does not apply to certain vessels, and the third offers an
additional option for submitting a notice of arrival. These changes
either have no effect on the public, or ease a public burden by
relaxing the regulatory requirement or providing more options in the
reporting requirement. For these reasons, the Coast Guard finds good
cause to publish this interim rule without first publishing an NPRM.
Although we have good cause to publish this rule without prior
notice and comment, we value public comments. As a result, we are
soliciting public comments on this interim rule and may revise the
final rule in response to those comments.
[[Page 74667]]
B. Regulatory Evaluation
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993, requires a determination whether a regulatory
action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and subject to the requirements of the
Executive Order. This rule has been identified as significant under
Executive Order 12866 and has been reviewed by OMB. A Regulatory
Assessment is available in the docket as indicated under the ``Public
Participation and Request for Comments'' section of this preamble. A
summary of the analysis follows.
As in the temporary rule, the two cost elements in the interim rule
are the NOA requirements and the vessel and facility security
requirements associated with the Maritime Transportation Security Act
of 2002 (``MTSA'', Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064). Vessels that
transport CDC materials already are required to submit NOAs to the
Coast Guard. 33 CFR 160.202 and 160.212. Vessels and facilities that
carry and handle CDC materials are required to implement security
measures to comply with MTSA regulations (Vessel Security Plans, 33 CFR
part 104; Facility Security Plans, 33 CFR part 105).
For our analysis of the costs of this interim rule, we have
retained the estimate from the Regulatory Assessment conducted for the
August 2004 temporary rule of about 9,200 barges that can potentially
transport ammonium nitrate and propylene oxide. In addition, we
retained from the same Regulatory Assessment an estimate of 50 as the
average number of fleeting facilities that can potentially receive
these two cargoes and the estimate of approximately 11,400 port calls
made by about 2,220 vessels that can potentially carry CDC materials.
The initial cost of the interim rule for the NOA and the security
requirements is approximately $6.8 million (non-discounted), which
covers the preparation of NOAs, the security requirements for vessels
and facilities, and the installation, operation and maintenance of
equipment that may be required to upgrade facility security. The annual
cost of the interim rule for the NOA and the security requirements is
approximately $4.9 million (non-discounted).
We estimate the discounted total cost of the interim rule to vessel
owners and facilities to range from $38.9 million to $45.1 million
(2005-2014, seven percent and three percent discount rates,
respectively). We estimate that fleeting facilities will incur
approximately 88 percent of the discounted total cost ($34.3 to $39.8
million). Table 1 presents the discounted total cost of the interim
rule by element of compliance.
Table 1.--Summary of Discounted Costs of Interim Rule for NOA and Facility and Vessel Security Requirements
(2005-2014, Three and Seven Percent Discount Rates)
[Cost by Element* ($ Millions)]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessels not
previously Covered by Vessel Facility Total PV
Increase in NOA NOA security security cost of IR
submittals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seven Percent Discount Rate.................... $0.062 $0.35 $4.1 $34.3 $38.9
Three Percent Discount Rate.................... 0.072 0.41 4.8 39.8 45.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
As shown in Table 1, using the seven percent discount rate, we
estimate the cost associated with the increase in NOA submittals for
vessels that only carry ammonium nitrate or propylene oxide to be $0.35
million of the total discounted cost of this interim rule. The cost
associated with the vessel and facility security requirements is $38.4
million at a seven percent discount rate ($4.1 for vessel security +
$34.3 for facility security). Using three percent as the discount rate,
we estimated the cost associated with an increase in NOA submittals for
vessels that only carry ammonium nitrate or propylene oxide to be $0.41
million, and the cost associated with the vessel and facility security
requirements is $44.6 million ($4.8 for vessel security + $39.8 for
facility security).
The qualitative benefits in this interim rule are security-related.
By adding ammonium nitrate and propylene oxide to the list of CDCs,
society will benefit, as the whereabouts of these two dangerous cargoes
are tracked and become known. Furthermore, the revision of the CDC
definition to include ammonium nitrate and propylene oxide, will
provide relevant information about an applicable vessel's cargo and the
threat that cargo may pose.
This interim rule will provide security standards for fleeting
facilities that handle these two dangerous cargoes. These security
standards will increase awareness, communication, and surveillance to
reduce the likelihood of theft and unlawful access to fleeting
facilities that handle these volatile and dangerous cargoes.
Lastly, this interim rule will allow the Coast Guard to provide
greater flexibility for NOA submissions by allowing vessel owners and
operators three additional electronic means of NOA submittal.
C. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
This rule does not require a general notice of proposed rulemaking and,
therefore, is exempt from the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Although this rule is exempt, we have reviewed it for
potential economic impacts on small entities.
We expect that this interim rule may have an economic impact on
some small entities, as defined by the Small Business Administration.
Small entities affected by this rule fall into two groups: (1) Those
small entities that currently carry or handle CDCs in addition to
ammonium nitrate and ammonium nitrate based fertilizers, in bulk, and
propylene oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk; and (2)
those small entities that currently carry or handle only ammonium
nitrate and ammonium nitrate based fertilizers in bulk, and propylene
oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide, in bulk.
[[Page 74668]]
Small entities in the first category currently submit NOAs and
comply with the security measures and planning requirements. These
entities will have to submit a greater number of NOAs for the newly
covered cargoes. They may have to revise existing security plans and
change security measures to cover these cargoes.
Small entities in the second category were affected for the first
time by the temporary rule and will continue to comply with NOA
requirements in 33 CFR part 160 for shipments of these cargoes and with
the security measures and planning requirements in 33 CFR parts 104 and
105.
The Coast Guard is particularly interested in the impact of this
rule on small entities. If you are a small entity, we specifically
request comments regarding the economic impact of this rule on you.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If you think
this interim rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please consult ENS Joseph Azzata,
Office of Port Security Planning and Readiness (G-MPP), Coast Guard,
telephone 202-267-0069. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
E. Collection of Information
This interim rule does not require a new collection of information
(COI) or change to the two existing OMB-approved collections, 1625-0100
and 1625-0077. The current approval for 1625-0100 expires on March 31,
2008. The approval for 1625-0077 expires July 31, 2008.
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of
Executive Order 13132, the Coast Guard certifies that this rule does
not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact statement.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their
discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses
actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000
or more in any one year. UMRA does not require an assessment in the
case of an interim rule issued without prior notice and comment.
Nevertheless, the Coast Guard does not expect this interim rule to
result in such an expenditure. We discuss this interim rule's effects
elsewhere in this preamble.
H. Taking of Private Property
This interim rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
I. Civil Justice Reform
This interim rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
J. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This interim rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.
K. Indian Tribal Governments
This interim rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
L. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Order. Although it is a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
M. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This interim rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
N. Environment
We have analyzed this interim rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraphs (34)(a) and (d),
of the Instruction from further environmental documentation. An
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in
[[Page 74669]]
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
33 CFR Part 104
Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures, Vessels.
33 CFR Part 105
Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures.
33 CFR Part 160
Administrative practice and procedure; Harbors; Hazardous materials
transportation; Marine safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Vessels; Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 104, 105, and 160 as follows:
PART 104--MARITIME SECURITY: VESSELS
0
1. The authority citation for part 104 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. In Sec. 104.105, remove temporary paragraph (a)(12); reinstate
temporarily suspended paragraph (a)(9); and revise paragraph (a)(9) to
read as follows:
Sec. 104.105 Applicability.
(a) * * *
(9) Barge carrying certain dangerous cargo in bulk or barge that is
subject to 46 CFR Chapter I, subchapter I, that is engaged on an
international voyage.
* * * * *
Sec. 104.115 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 104.115, remove temporary paragraph (d).
Sec. 104.410 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 104.410, remove temporary paragraph (g).
PART 105--MARITIME SECURITY: FACILITIES
0
5. The authority citation for part 105 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 70103; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 105.115 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 105.115, remove temporary paragraph (c).
Sec. 105.410 [Amended]
0
7. In Sec. 105.410, remove temporary paragraph (g).
PART 160--PORTS AND WATERWAYS SAFETY-GENERAL
0
8. The authority citation for part 160 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. Subpart C is
also issued under the authority of 33 U.S.C. 1225 and 46 U.S.C.
3715.
0
9. In Sec. 160.202, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 160.202 Applicability.
* * * * *
(b) This subpart does not apply to U.S. recreational vessels under
46 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., but does apply to foreign recreational vessels.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 160.204, in the definition for ``Certain dangerous cargo
(CDC)'', remove temporary paragraphs (9) and (10); in the definition
for ``Certain dangerous cargo (CDC)'', add new paragraphs (8)(ix) and
(9); and add a new definition for ``Certain dangerous cargo residue
(CDC residue)'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 160.204 Definitions.
* * * * *
Certain dangerous cargo (CDC)
* * * * *
(8) The following bulk liquids:
* * * * *
(ix) Propylene oxide, alone or mixed with ethylene oxide.
(9) The following bulk solids:
(i) Ammonium nitrate listed as a Division 5.1 (oxidizing) material
in 49 CFR 172.101 that is not certain dangerous cargo residue (CDC
residue).
(ii) Ammonium nitrate based fertilizer listed as a Division 5.1
(oxidizing) material in 49 CFR 172.101 that is not CDC residue.
Certain dangerous cargo residue (CDC residue) means ammonium
nitrate in bulk or ammonium nitrate based fertilizer in bulk remaining
after all saleable cargo is discharged, not exceeding 1,000 pounds in
total and not individually accumulated in quantities exceeding two
cubic feet.
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 160.210, remove temporary paragraph (e), reinstate
temporarily suspended paragraph (a) and revise paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 160.210 Methods for submitting an NOA.
(a) Submission to the National Vessel Movement Center (NVMC).
Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, vessels
must submit NOA information required by Sec. 160.206 (entries 1
through 9 in Table 160.206) to the NVMC, United States Coast Guard, 408
Coast Guard Drive, Kearneysville, WV 25430, by:
(1) Electronic submission via the electronic Notice of Arrival and
Departure (eNOAD) and consisting of the following three formats:
(i) A Web site that can be used to submit NOA information directly
to the NVMC, accessible from the NVMC web site at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov;
(ii) Electronic submission of Extensible Markup Language (XML)
formatted documents via web service;
(iii) Electronic submission via Microsoft InfoPath; contact the
NVMC at sans@nvmc.uscg.gov or by telephone at 1-800-708-9823 or 304-
264-2502 for more information;
(2) E-mail at sans@nvmc.uscg.gov. Workbook available at https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov;
(3) Fax at 1-800-547-8724 or 304-264-2684. Workbook available at
https://www.nvmc.uscg.gov; or,
(4) Telephone at 1-800-708-9823 or 304-264-2502.
* * * * *
Dated: December 8, 2005.
Thomas H. Collins,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.
[FR Doc. 05-24126 Filed 12-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P