Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Operations, Inc., (Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3); Order Approving Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment, 73800-73801 [E5-7271]
Download as PDF
73800
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Notices
Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. One (1) Insurance Appeal. Closed
pursuant to Exemptions (6) and (9)(B).
2. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed
pursuant to Exemptions (2) and (6).
PLACE:
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–24005 Filed 12–8–05; 4:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–M
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Sunshine Meeting; Regular Board of
Directors Meeting
Time & Date: 2 p.m., Monday,
December 19, 2005.
Place: Neighborhood Reinvestment
Corporation, DBA NeighborWorks
America, 1325 G Street NW., Suite 800,
Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.
Status: Open.
Contact Person for More Information:
Jeffrey T. Bryson, General Counsel/
Secretary 202–220–2372;
jbryson@nw.org.
Agenda:
I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes: October 3, 2005
III. Audit Committee Meeting
IV. Finance and Budget Committee
V. Corporate Fundraising Committee
VI. CEO Quarterly Management Report
VII. NHSA Update
VIII. Adjournment
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–24030 Filed 12–9–05; 2:13 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570–01–M
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–382; License No. NPF–38]
Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy
Operations, Inc., (Waterford Steam
Electric Station, Unit 3); Order
Approving Transfer of License and
Conforming Amendment
I.
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (ELI) is the
owner of Waterford Steam Electric
Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3), located in
St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. Entergy
Operations, Inc. (EOI), is the licensed
operator of Waterford 3. They are the
holders of Facility Operating License
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:22 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
No. NPF–38, which authorizes
operation of Waterford 3, issued by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or the Commission). The license
authorizes ELI to possess, and EOI to
use and operate, Waterford 3.
II.
By application dated July 20, 2005, as
supplemented September 14, 2005, EOI,
acting on behalf of itself and ELI,
requested approval by the NRC of the
transfer of Facility Operating License
No. NPF–38 for Waterford 3 from ELI to
Entergy Louisiana, LLC (ELL). The
initial application and the supplement
are hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the
application’’ unless otherwise indicated.
EOI also requested approval of a
conforming license amendment to
reflect the transfer. The conforming
license amendment would replace
references to ELI with ELL. The
application requested approval of the
transfer of Facility Operating License
and Materials License No. NPF–38 for
Waterford 3, held by ELI and EOI, and
approval of a conforming amendment,
pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Sections 50.80 and
50.90. The transfer is associated with
the restructuring of ELI from a Louisiana
corporation to a Texas limited liability
company, ELL. EOI will continue to
operate Waterford 3, and the proposed
restructuring will not affect the
technical or financial qualifications of
ELL or EOI.
Notice of consideration of approval
and an opportunity for a hearing was
published in the Federal Register on
October 17, 2005 (70 FR 60374). No
hearing requests or written comments
were received. The supplemental letter
dated September 14, 2005, provided
additional information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not affect the applicability of
the generic no significant hazards
consideration determination.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license,
or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. After
reviewing the information in EOI’s
application and other information
before the Commission, and relying
upon the representations and
agreements contained in the
application, the NRC staff has
determined that ELL is qualified to hold
the license for Waterford 3 and that the
transfer of the license to ELL, as
previously described herein, is
otherwise consistent with applicable
provisions of law, regulations, and
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
orders issued by the Commission,
subject to the conditions set forth below.
The NRC staff has further found that the
application for the proposed license
amendment complies with the
standards and requirements of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,
and the Commission’s rules and
regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter
1; the facility will operate in conformity
with the application, the provisions of
the Act, and the rules and regulations of
the Commission; there is reasonable
assurance that the activities authorized
by the proposed license amendment can
be conducted without endangering the
health and safety of the public and that
such activities will be conducted in
compliance with the Commission’s
regulations; and the issuance of the
proposed license amendment will not
be inimical to the common defense and
security or the health and safety of the
public. The NRC staff finds the issuance
of the proposed amendment will be in
accordance with 10 CFR part 51 of the
Commission’s regulations and all
applicable requirements have been
satisfied. The foregoing findings are
supported by a safety evaluation dated
December 2, 2005.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, and 184 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234, and
10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby ordered that
the transfer of the license as described
herein to Entergy Louisiana, LLC, is
approved, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) After receipt of all required
regulatory approvals of the license
transfer to Entergy Louisiana, LLC,
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. shall inform the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, in writing of such receipt,
within 5 business days, and of the date
of the closing of the transfer no later
than 7 business days before the date of
closing. If the transfer is not completed
by January 1, 2006, this Order shall
become null and void, with the
provision that, upon written application
and for good cause shown, such date
may be extended.
(2) At the time of the closing of the
transfer of ownership of Waterford 3
and license from Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
to Entergy Louisiana, LLC, the
Waterford 3 decommissioning trust
agreement(s) shall be amended to reflect
Entergy Louisiana, LLC as the owner of
all the decommissioning trust funds
accumulated as of the date of the
closing.
(3) Prior to completion of the transfer
of the Waterford 3 operating license,
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Notices
Entergy Louisiana, LLC shall provide
the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, satisfactory documentary
evidence that it has obtained the
appropriate amount of insurance
required of licensees under 10 CFR part
140, ‘‘Financial Protection
Requirements and Indemnity
Agreements,’’ of the Commission’s
regulations.
It is further ordered that consistent
with 10 CFR 2.1315(b), a license
amendment that makes changes, as
indicated in Enclosure 2 to the cover
letter forwarding this Order, to conform
the license to reflect the subject license
transfer is approved. The amendment
shall be issued and made effective at the
time the proposed transfer is completed.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the initial application dated
July 20, 2005, the supplemental letter
dated September 14, 2005, and the
safety evaluation dated December 2,
2005, which are available for public
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and
accessible electronically through the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
on the NRC’s Web site https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the document located in
ADAMS, should contact the NRR PDR
Reference Staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail
to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of December, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R. William Borchardt,
Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5–7271 Filed 12–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–334 and 50–412; License
Nos. DPR–66 AND NPF–73]
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating
Company (FENOC), et al.; Notice of
Issuance of Director’s Decision Under
10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that the
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC or Commission) has
issued a Director’s Decision with regard
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:22 Dec 13, 2005
Jkt 208001
to a petition dated April 12, 2005, filed
by Mr. David Lochbaum, of the Union
of Concerned Scientists, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Petitioner.’’ The
petition concerns the operation of the
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos.
1 and 2 (BVPS–1 and 2).
The Petitioner requested that the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or Commission) either (1) take
enforcement action against FirstEnergy
Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC or
the licensee) and impose a civil penalty
of at least $55,000, or (2) move the
license renewal application for the
Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos.
1 and 2 (BVPS–1 and 2), to the end of
the current review queue.
As a basis for the requests, the
Petitioner cited NRC news release 05–
052, dated March 24, 2005, which stated
that the NRC returned the February 9,
2005, license renewal application
submitted by FirstEnergy Nuclear
Operating Company. The Petitioner
quoted a statement made by Mr. David
Matthews, Director of the Division of
Regulatory Improvement Programs at
NRC:
The NRC’s primary mission is ensuring
protection of public health and safety, and
we cannot do that for an additional 20 years
of Beaver Valley operation unless we have
complete, accurate, and up-to-date
information on the plant. Given the gaps in
the current application, we simply could not
properly review FirstEnergy’s request.
The Petitioner further stated that the
licensee’s February 9, 2005, submittal
was not complete and accurate in all
material respects and that this is a
violation of 10 CFR 50.9(a) which
requires, in part, that information
provided to the Commission by a
licensee shall be complete and accurate
in all material respects. The Petitioner
stated his basis for the alternative
sanction of moving the license renewal
application: Moving the application to
the end of the current queue would
allow time for the licensee to ensure the
resubmittal is complete and accurate. It
would also allow the NRC to review the
application without requiring additional
resources to recheck the resubmittal
concurrent with other license renewal
reviews, which the Petitioner stated
could compromise the quality of the
NRC review.
The NRC staff performed an
acceptance review of the license
renewal application to determine if
sufficient information existed for the
NRC staff to begin its detailed technical
review. The NRC staff determined that
the application did not contain
sufficient detail and therefore was not
acceptable for docketing. This
determination was conveyed to the
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73801
applicant by letter dated March 24,
2005. The licensee responded to this
letter by letter dated April 19, 2005.
In an acknowledgment letter dated
May 20, 2005, the NRC informed the
Petitioner that the portion of the
petition requesting that enforcement
action be taken was accepted for review
under 10 CFR 2.206 and had been
referred to the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation for appropriate action.
The NRC staff sent a copy of the
proposed Director’s Decision to the
Petitioner and to the licensee for
comment by letters dated September 15,
2005. The NRC staff did not receive any
comments on the proposed Director’s
Decision.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation has determined that
the request to take enforcement action
against the licensee and impose a civil
penalty of at least $55,000 is denied.
The reasons for this decision are
explained in the Director’s Decision
pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 (DD–05–06),
the complete text of which is available
for inspection at the Commission’s
Public Document Room, located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, or electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the NRC Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
The Director’s Decision addresses (1)
whether a violation of NRC regulations
occurred with respect to the licensee’s
license renewal application and (2)
whether enforcement action should be
taken.
With respect to the first issue, the
NRC staff concluded that the licensee’s
license renewal application did contain
an example of incorrect information and
that the submission of incorrect
information in the licensee’s application
is a violation of 10 CFR 54.13. With
respect to the second issue, the NRC
staff concluded that the violation is
appropriately classified as minor and
pursuant to Section 3.9 of the NRC
Enforcement Manual, the NRC did not
document its identification of this
minor violation in an inspection report
or correspondence to the applicant.
Further, pursuant to Section 3.9 of the
NRC Enforcement Manual and the NRC
Enforcement Policy, Sections IV.B,
VI.A–B, and Supplement VII.E, the NRC
did not cite this minor violation and did
not propose a civil penalty.
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
E:\FR\FM\13DEN1.SGM
13DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73800-73801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7271]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-382; License No. NPF-38]
Entergy Louisiana, Inc., Entergy Operations, Inc., (Waterford
Steam Electric Station, Unit 3); Order Approving Transfer of License
and Conforming Amendment
I.
Entergy Louisiana, Inc. (ELI) is the owner of Waterford Steam
Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3), located in St. Charles Parish,
Louisiana. Entergy Operations, Inc. (EOI), is the licensed operator of
Waterford 3. They are the holders of Facility Operating License No.
NPF-38, which authorizes operation of Waterford 3, issued by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission). The license
authorizes ELI to possess, and EOI to use and operate, Waterford 3.
II.
By application dated July 20, 2005, as supplemented September 14,
2005, EOI, acting on behalf of itself and ELI, requested approval by
the NRC of the transfer of Facility Operating License No. NPF-38 for
Waterford 3 from ELI to Entergy Louisiana, LLC (ELL). The initial
application and the supplement are hereinafter referred to as ``the
application'' unless otherwise indicated. EOI also requested approval
of a conforming license amendment to reflect the transfer. The
conforming license amendment would replace references to ELI with ELL.
The application requested approval of the transfer of Facility
Operating License and Materials License No. NPF-38 for Waterford 3,
held by ELI and EOI, and approval of a conforming amendment, pursuant
to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Sections 50.80 and
50.90. The transfer is associated with the restructuring of ELI from a
Louisiana corporation to a Texas limited liability company, ELL. EOI
will continue to operate Waterford 3, and the proposed restructuring
will not affect the technical or financial qualifications of ELL or
EOI.
Notice of consideration of approval and an opportunity for a
hearing was published in the Federal Register on October 17, 2005 (70
FR 60374). No hearing requests or written comments were received. The
supplemental letter dated September 14, 2005, provided additional
information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed, and did not affect the
applicability of the generic no significant hazards consideration
determination.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license, or any right thereunder,
shall be transferred, directly or indirectly, through transfer of
control of the license, unless the Commission shall give its consent in
writing. After reviewing the information in EOI's application and other
information before the Commission, and relying upon the representations
and agreements contained in the application, the NRC staff has
determined that ELL is qualified to hold the license for Waterford 3
and that the transfer of the license to ELL, as previously described
herein, is otherwise consistent with applicable provisions of law,
regulations, and orders issued by the Commission, subject to the
conditions set forth below. The NRC staff has further found that the
application for the proposed license amendment complies with the
standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended, and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR
Chapter 1; the facility will operate in conformity with the
application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations
of the Commission; there is reasonable assurance that the activities
authorized by the proposed license amendment can be conducted without
endangering the health and safety of the public and that such
activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's
regulations; and the issuance of the proposed license amendment will
not be inimical to the common defense and security or the health and
safety of the public. The NRC staff finds the issuance of the proposed
amendment will be in accordance with 10 CFR part 51 of the Commission's
regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. The
foregoing findings are supported by a safety evaluation dated December
2, 2005.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 161b, 161i, and 184 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234,
and 10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby ordered that the transfer of the license
as described herein to Entergy Louisiana, LLC, is approved, subject to
the following conditions:
(1) After receipt of all required regulatory approvals of the
license transfer to Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Louisiana, Inc.
shall inform the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, in
writing of such receipt, within 5 business days, and of the date of the
closing of the transfer no later than 7 business days before the date
of closing. If the transfer is not completed by January 1, 2006, this
Order shall become null and void, with the provision that, upon written
application and for good cause shown, such date may be extended.
(2) At the time of the closing of the transfer of ownership of
Waterford 3 and license from Entergy Louisiana, Inc. to Entergy
Louisiana, LLC, the Waterford 3 decommissioning trust agreement(s)
shall be amended to reflect Entergy Louisiana, LLC as the owner of all
the decommissioning trust funds accumulated as of the date of the
closing.
(3) Prior to completion of the transfer of the Waterford 3
operating license,
[[Page 73801]]
Entergy Louisiana, LLC shall provide the Director, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, satisfactory documentary evidence that it has
obtained the appropriate amount of insurance required of licensees
under 10 CFR part 140, ``Financial Protection Requirements and
Indemnity Agreements,'' of the Commission's regulations.
It is further ordered that consistent with 10 CFR 2.1315(b), a
license amendment that makes changes, as indicated in Enclosure 2 to
the cover letter forwarding this Order, to conform the license to
reflect the subject license transfer is approved. The amendment shall
be issued and made effective at the time the proposed transfer is
completed.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this action, see the initial
application dated July 20, 2005, the supplemental letter dated
September 14, 2005, and the safety evaluation dated December 2, 2005,
which are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible electronically
through the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet on the NRC's Web site
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the document
located in ADAMS, should contact the NRR PDR Reference Staff by
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of December, 2005.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
R. William Borchardt,
Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E5-7271 Filed 12-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P