Special Conditions: Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 Airplanes; High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)., 73559-73561 [05-23935]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
factor test weight, or specify ‘‘organic’’
as defined by 7 CFR part 205. This
definition expires July 31, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Section 800.18 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(8) to read as
follows:
§ 800.18 Waivers of the official inspection
and Class X weighing requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) High Quality Specialty Grain
Shipped in Containers. Official
inspection and weighing requirements
do not apply to high quality specialty
grain exported in containers. Records
generated during the normal course of
business that pertain to these shipments
shall be made available to the Service
upon request, for review or copying.
These records shall be maintained for a
period of 3 years. This waiver expires
July 31, 2010.
*
*
*
*
*
James E. Link,
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–23911 Filed 12–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–EN–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM336; Special Conditions No.
25–309–SC]
Special Conditions: Sabreliner Model
NA–265–60 Airplanes; High-Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF).
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for Sabreliner Model NA–265–60
airplanes modified by Flight Research,
Inc. These modified airplanes will have
a novel or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. The modification
incorporates the installation of
altimeter/air data display units
manufactured by Innovative Solutions
and Support, Inc. These display units
perform critical functions. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the protection of
these systems from the effects of highintensity radiated fields (HIRF). These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Dec 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is December 5, 2005.
We must receive your comments by
January 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies
of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Attention: Rules Docket
(ANM–113), Docket No. NM336, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055–4056. You may deliver two
copies to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. You
must mark your comments: Docket No.
NM336. You can inspect comments in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal Holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–2799; facsimile
(425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment is impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
certification of the airplane and thus
delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance; however, we invite interested
people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or
views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
special conditions, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. We ask that
you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions.
You may inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you
wish to review the docket in person, go
to the address in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble between 7:30 a.m. and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73559
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on these
special conditions, include with your
comments a pre-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the docket number
appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
On May 6, 2005, Flight Research, Inc.,
1062 Flight Line, Hangar 161, Mojave,
California 93501, applied for a
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) to
modify Sabreliner Model NA–265–60
airplanes. These models are currently
approved under Type Certificate No.
A2WE. The Sabreliner Model NA–265–
60 is a transport category airplane
powered by two Pratt and Whitney
Turbo Wasp JT12A–8 engines. The
maximum takeoff weight is 20,172
pounds. These airplanes operate with a
2-person crew and can seat up to 10
passengers. The modification
incorporates the installation of
altimeter/air data display units
manufactured by Innovative Solutions
and Support, Inc. The avionics/
electronics and electrical systems
installed in this airplane have the
potential to be vulnerable to highintensity radiated fields (HIRF) external
to the airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.101, Flight Research, Inc. must show
that the Sabreliner Model NA–265–60,
as changed, continues to meet the
applicable provisions of the regulations
incorporated by reference in Type
Certificate No. A2WE, or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change. The
regulations incorporated by reference in
the type certificate are commonly
referred to as the ‘‘original type
certification basis.’’ The certification
basis for the Sabreliner Model NA–265–
60 airplanes includes Civil Aeronautics
Manual 4b, as amended by Amendment
4b–1 through Amendment 4b–9, Special
Civil Air Regulation No. SR 422B Item
2, the Special Conditions set forth in
Attachment ‘‘A’’ of FAA letter to NAA
[North American Aviation] dated
October 8, 1959, and FAA letter to NAA
dated January 30, 1962.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
73560
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
(i.e., part 25, as amended) do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for the Sabreliner Model NA–
265–60 airplanes because of a novel or
unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Sabreliner Model NA–
265–60 airplanes must comply with the
fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36.
Special conditions, as defined in 14
CFR 11.19, are issued under § 11.38 and
become part of the type certification
basis under § 21.101.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should Flight Research, Inc.
apply at a later date for a supplemental
type certificate to modify any other
model included on Type Certificate No.
A2WE to incorporate the same or
similar novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
As noted earlier, the Sabreliner Model
NA–265–60 airplanes modified by
Flight Research, Inc. will incorporate
altimeter/air data display units that will
perform critical functions. These
display units may be vulnerable to highintensity radiated fields external to the
airplane. The current airworthiness
standards of part 25 do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the protection of this equipment
from the adverse effects of HIRF.
Accordingly, these systems are
considered to be a novel or unusual
design feature.
Discussion
There is no specific regulation that
addresses protection requirements for
electrical and electronic systems from
HIRF. Increased power levels from
ground-based radio transmitters and the
growing use of sensitive avionics/
electronics and electrical systems to
command and control airplanes have
made it necessary to provide adequate
protection.
To ensure that a level of safety is
achieved equivalent to that intended by
the regulations incorporated by
reference, special conditions are needed
for the Sabreliner Model NA–265–60
airplanes modified by Flight Research,
Inc. These special conditions require
that new avionics/electronics and
electrical systems that perform critical
functions be designed and installed to
preclude component damage and
interruption of function due to both the
direct and indirect effects of HIRF.
High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
With the trend toward increased
power levels from ground-based
transmitters, and the advent of space
and satellite communications coupled
with electronic command and control of
the airplane, the immunity of critical
avionics/electronics and electrical
systems to HIRF must be established.
It is not possible to precisely define
the HIRF to which the airplane will be
exposed in service. There is also
uncertainty concerning the effectiveness
of airframe shielding for HIRF.
Furthermore, coupling of
electromagnetic energy to cockpitinstalled equipment through the cockpit
window apertures is undefined. Based
on surveys and analysis of existing HIRF
emitters, an adequate level of protection
exists when compliance with the HIRF
protection special condition is shown
with either paragraph 1 or 2 below:
1. A minimum threat of 100 volts rms
(root-mean-square) per meter electric
field strength from 10 KHz to 18 GHz.
a. The threat must be applied to the
system elements and their associated
wiring harnesses without the benefit of
airframe shielding.
b. Demonstration of this level of
protection is established through system
tests and analysis.
2. A threat external to the airframe of
the field strengths identified in the table
below for the frequency ranges
indicated. Both peak and average field
strength components from the table are
to be demonstrated.
Field Strength
(volts per meter)
Frequency
Peak
10 kHz–100 kHz ..............................................................................................................................................................
100 kHz–500 kHz ............................................................................................................................................................
500 kHz–2 MHz ...............................................................................................................................................................
2 MHz–30 MHz ................................................................................................................................................................
30 MHz–70 MHz ..............................................................................................................................................................
70 MHz–100 MHz ............................................................................................................................................................
100MHz–200 MHz ...........................................................................................................................................................
200 MHz–400 MHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
400 MHz–700 MHz ..........................................................................................................................................................
700 MHz–1 GHz ..............................................................................................................................................................
1 GHz–2 GHz ..................................................................................................................................................................
2 GHz–4 GHz ..................................................................................................................................................................
4 GHz–6 GHz ..................................................................................................................................................................
6 GHz–8 GHz ..................................................................................................................................................................
8 GHz–12 GHz ................................................................................................................................................................
12 GHz–18 GHz ..............................................................................................................................................................
18 GHz–40 GHz ..............................................................................................................................................................
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
700
700
2000
3000
3000
1000
3000
2000
600
Average
50
50
50
100
50
50
100
100
50
100
200
200
200
200
300
200
200
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak of the root-mean-square (rms) over the complete modulation period.
The threat levels identified above are
the result of an FAA review of existing
studies on the subject of HIRF, in light
of the ongoing work of the
Electromagnetic Effects Harmonization
Working Group of the Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Dec 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to Sabreliner
Model NA–265–60 airplanes modified
by Flight Research, Inc. Should Flight
Research, Inc. apply at a later date for
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model included on
Type Certificate No. A2WE to
incorporate the same or similar novel or
unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as
well under provisions of § 21.101.
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 13, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on Sabreliner
Model NA–265–60 airplanes modified
by Flight Research, Inc. It is not a rule
of general applicability and affects only
the applicant who applied to the FAA
for approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special
conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment procedure in
several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change
from those previously issued. Because a
delay would significantly affect the
certification of the airplane, which is
imminent, the FAA has determined that
prior public notice and comment are
unnecessary and impracticable, and
good cause exists for adopting these
special conditions upon issuance. The
FAA is requesting comments to allow
interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in
response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the supplemental type
certification basis for the Sabreliner
Model NA–265–60 airplanes modified
by Flight Research, Inc.
1. Protection from Unwanted Effects
of High-Intensity Radiated Fields
(HIRF). Each electrical and electronic
system that performs critical functions
must be designed and installed to
ensure that the operation and
operational capability of these systems
to perform critical functions are not
adversely affected when the airplane is
exposed to high-intensity radiated
fields.
2. For the purpose of these special
conditions, the following definition
applies: Critical Functions: Functions
whose failure would contribute to or
cause a failure condition that would
prevent the continued safe flight and
landing of the airplane.
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Dec 12, 2005
Jkt 208001
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 5, 2005.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 05–23935 Filed 12–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No NM309; Special Conditions No.
25–308–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 737–
200/200C/300/400/500/600/700/700C/
800/900 Series Airplanes; Flammability
Reduction Means (Fuel Tank Inerting)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Boeing Model 737–200/
200C/300/400/500/600/700/700C/800/
900 series airplanes. These airplanes, as
modified by Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, include a new flammability
reduction means that uses a nitrogen
generation system to reduce the oxygen
content in the center wing fuel tank so
that exposure to a combustible mixture
of fuel and air is substantially
minimized. This system is intended to
reduce the average flammability
exposure of the fleet of airplanes with
the system installed to a level
equivalent to 3 percent of the airplane
operating time. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the design and installation of this
system. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
the Administrator considers necessary
to ensure an acceptable level of safety
for the installation of the system and to
define performance objectives the
system must achieve to be considered
an acceptable means for minimizing
development of flammable vapors in the
fuel tank installation.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is December 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Dostert, Propulsion and
Mechanical Systems Branch, FAA,
ANM–112, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington, 98055–4056;
telephone (425) 227–2132, facsimile
(425) 227–1320, e-mail
mike.dostert@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73561
Background
Boeing Commercial Airplanes intends
to modify the Model 737 series
airplanes to incorporate a new
flammability reduction means (FRM)
that will inert the center fuel tanks with
nitrogen-enriched air (NEA). Though the
provisions of § 25.981, as amended by
Amendment 25–102, will apply to this
design change, these special conditions
address novel design features. These
special conditions are similar to those
published in the Federal Register
[Docket No. NM270; Special Conditions
No. 25–285–SC] for incorporation of an
FRM on Boeing Model 747–100/200B/
200F/200C/SR/SP/100B/300/100B SUD/
400/400D/400F series airplanes (70 FR
7800, January 24, 2005).
Regulations used as the standard for
certification of transport category
airplanes prior to Amendment 25–102,
effective June 6, 2001, were intended to
prevent fuel tank explosions by
eliminating possible ignition sources
from inside the fuel tanks. Service
experience of airplanes certificated to
the earlier standards shows that ignition
source prevention alone has not been
totally effective at preventing accidents.
Commercial transport airplane fuel tank
safety requirements have remained
relatively unchanged throughout the
evolution of piston-powered airplanes
and later into the jet age. The
fundamental premise for precluding fuel
tank explosions has involved
establishing that the design does not
result in a condition that would cause
an ignition source within the fuel tank
ullage (the space in the tank occupied
by fuel vapor and air). A basic
assumption in this approach has been
that the fuel tank could contain
flammable vapors under a wide range of
airplane operating conditions, even
though there were periods of time in
which the vapor space would not
support combustion.
Fuel Properties
Jet fuel vapors are flammable in
certain temperature and pressure ranges.
The flammability temperature range of
jet engine fuel vapors varies with the
type and properties of the fuel, the
ambient pressure in the tank, and the
amount of dissolved oxygen released
from the fuel into the tank. The amount
of dissolved oxygen in a tank will also
vary depending on the amount of
vibration and sloshing of the fuel that
occurs within the tank.
Jet A fuel is the most commonly used
commercial jet fuel in the United States.
Jet A–1 fuel is commonly used in other
parts of the world. At sea level and with
no sloshing or vibration present, these
E:\FR\FM\13DER1.SGM
13DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 13, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73559-73561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23935]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM336; Special Conditions No. 25-309-SC]
Special Conditions: Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 Airplanes; High-
Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF).
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Sabreliner Model NA-
265-60 airplanes modified by Flight Research, Inc. These modified
airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to
the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for
transport category airplanes. The modification incorporates the
installation of altimeter/air data display units manufactured by
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. These display units perform
critical functions. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not
contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the protection of
these systems from the effects of high-intensity radiated fields
(HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is December 5,
2005. We must receive your comments by January 12, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You must mail two copies of your comments to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport Airplane Directorate, Attention:
Rules Docket (ANM-113), Docket No. NM336, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. You may deliver two copies to the
Transport Airplane Directorate at the above address. You must mark your
comments: Docket No. NM336. You can inspect comments in the Rules
Docket weekdays, except Federal Holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2799; facsimile (425) 227-
1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice and opportunity for prior public
comment is impracticable because these procedures would significantly
delay certification of the airplane and thus delivery of the affected
aircraft. In addition, the substance of these special conditions has
been subject to the public comment process in several prior instances
with no substantive comments received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these special conditions effective upon
issuance; however, we invite interested people to take part in this
rulemaking by sending written comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions. You may inspect the docket before
and after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these special conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on
these special conditions, include with your comments a pre-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the
date on the postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
On May 6, 2005, Flight Research, Inc., 1062 Flight Line, Hangar
161, Mojave, California 93501, applied for a Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) to modify Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes. These
models are currently approved under Type Certificate No. A2WE. The
Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 is a transport category airplane powered by
two Pratt and Whitney Turbo Wasp JT12A-8 engines. The maximum takeoff
weight is 20,172 pounds. These airplanes operate with a 2-person crew
and can seat up to 10 passengers. The modification incorporates the
installation of altimeter/air data display units manufactured by
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. The avionics/electronics and
electrical systems installed in this airplane have the potential to be
vulnerable to high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF) external to the
airplane.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Flight Research, Inc. must
show that the Sabreliner Model NA-265-60, as changed, continues to meet
the applicable provisions of the regulations incorporated by reference
in Type Certificate No. A2WE, or the applicable regulations in effect
on the date of application for the change. The regulations incorporated
by reference in the type certificate are commonly referred to as the
``original type certification basis.'' The certification basis for the
Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes includes Civil Aeronautics Manual
4b, as amended by Amendment 4b-1 through Amendment 4b-9, Special Civil
Air Regulation No. SR 422B Item 2, the Special Conditions set forth in
Attachment ``A'' of FAA letter to NAA [North American Aviation] dated
October 8, 1959, and FAA letter to NAA dated January 30, 1962.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations
[[Page 73560]]
(i.e., part 25, as amended) do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes because
of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and
the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
Special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, are issued under
Sec. 11.38 and become part of the type certification basis under Sec.
21.101.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should Flight Research, Inc. apply at a later date for
a supplemental type certificate to modify any other model included on
Type Certificate No. A2WE to incorporate the same or similar novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
As noted earlier, the Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes modified
by Flight Research, Inc. will incorporate altimeter/air data display
units that will perform critical functions. These display units may be
vulnerable to high-intensity radiated fields external to the airplane.
The current airworthiness standards of part 25 do not contain adequate
or appropriate safety standards for the protection of this equipment
from the adverse effects of HIRF. Accordingly, these systems are
considered to be a novel or unusual design feature.
Discussion
There is no specific regulation that addresses protection
requirements for electrical and electronic systems from HIRF. Increased
power levels from ground-based radio transmitters and the growing use
of sensitive avionics/electronics and electrical systems to command and
control airplanes have made it necessary to provide adequate
protection.
To ensure that a level of safety is achieved equivalent to that
intended by the regulations incorporated by reference, special
conditions are needed for the Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes
modified by Flight Research, Inc. These special conditions require that
new avionics/electronics and electrical systems that perform critical
functions be designed and installed to preclude component damage and
interruption of function due to both the direct and indirect effects of
HIRF.
High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
With the trend toward increased power levels from ground-based
transmitters, and the advent of space and satellite communications
coupled with electronic command and control of the airplane, the
immunity of critical avionics/electronics and electrical systems to
HIRF must be established.
It is not possible to precisely define the HIRF to which the
airplane will be exposed in service. There is also uncertainty
concerning the effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF.
Furthermore, coupling of electromagnetic energy to cockpit-installed
equipment through the cockpit window apertures is undefined. Based on
surveys and analysis of existing HIRF emitters, an adequate level of
protection exists when compliance with the HIRF protection special
condition is shown with either paragraph 1 or 2 below:
1. A minimum threat of 100 volts rms (root-mean-square) per meter
electric field strength from 10 KHz to 18 GHz.
a. The threat must be applied to the system elements and their
associated wiring harnesses without the benefit of airframe shielding.
b. Demonstration of this level of protection is established through
system tests and analysis.
2. A threat external to the airframe of the field strengths
identified in the table below for the frequency ranges indicated. Both
peak and average field strength components from the table are to be
demonstrated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Strength (volts
per meter)
Frequency -------------------------
Peak Average
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 kHz-100 kHz................................ 50 50
100 kHz-500 kHz............................... 50 50
500 kHz-2 MHz................................. 50 50
2 MHz-30 MHz.................................. 100 100
30 MHz-70 MHz................................. 50 50
70 MHz-100 MHz................................ 50 50
100MHz-200 MHz................................ 100 100
200 MHz-400 MHz............................... 100 100
400 MHz-700 MHz............................... 700 50
700 MHz-1 GHz................................. 700 100
1 GHz-2 GHz................................... 2000 200
2 GHz-4 GHz................................... 3000 200
4 GHz-6 GHz................................... 3000 200
6 GHz-8 GHz................................... 1000 200
8 GHz-12 GHz.................................. 3000 300
12 GHz-18 GHz................................. 2000 200
18 GHz-40 GHz................................. 600 200
-----------------------------------------------
The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak of the root-mean-
square (rms) over the complete modulation period.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The threat levels identified above are the result of an FAA review
of existing studies on the subject of HIRF, in light of the ongoing
work of the Electromagnetic Effects Harmonization Working Group of the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to
Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes modified by Flight Research, Inc.
Should Flight Research, Inc. apply at a later date for a supplemental
type certificate to modify any other model included on Type Certificate
No. A2WE to incorporate the same or similar novel or unusual design
feature, these special conditions would apply to that model as well
under provisions of Sec. 21.101.
[[Page 73561]]
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Sabreliner Model NA-265-60 airplanes modified by Flight Research,
Inc. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the
airplane.
The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment procedure in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued.
Because a delay would significantly affect the certification of the
airplane, which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public
notice and comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause
exists for adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is
requesting comments to allow interested persons to submit views that
may not have been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for
comment described above.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the supplemental type certification basis for the Sabreliner Model NA-
265-60 airplanes modified by Flight Research, Inc.
1. Protection from Unwanted Effects of High-Intensity Radiated
Fields (HIRF). Each electrical and electronic system that performs
critical functions must be designed and installed to ensure that the
operation and operational capability of these systems to perform
critical functions are not adversely affected when the airplane is
exposed to high-intensity radiated fields.
2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following
definition applies: Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would
contribute to or cause a failure condition that would prevent the
continued safe flight and landing of the airplane.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 5, 2005.
Kevin M. Mullin,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-23935 Filed 12-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P