Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Amendment 6, 73383-73389 [05-23929]
Download as PDF
73383
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 18, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
adding one new entry to the end of the
table to read as follows:
Subpart SS—Texas
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
§ 52.2270
2. In § 52.2270, the table in paragraph
(e) entitled ‘‘EPA approved
nonregulatory provisions and quasiregulatory measures’’ is amended by
I
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
*
Memorandum of Understanding Between the Statewide .....................
Texas Department of Transportation and the
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–23915 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
State approval/submittal date
EPA approval date
*
08/15/2002
*
12/12/2005 [Insert FR
page number where
document begins].
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 050314071–5230–02; I.D.
030105E]
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
RIN 0648–AS16
49 CFR Part 571
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic
States; Amendment 6
CFR Correction
AGENCY:
In Title 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Parts 400 to 599, revised as
of October 1, 2005, on page 384, in
§ 571.111, add S9.4 to read as follows:
§ 571.111
mirrors.
Standard No. 111; Rearview
*
*
*
*
*
S9.4(a) Each image required by
S9.3(a)(1) to be visible at the driver’s eye
location shall be separated from the
edge of the effective mirror surface of
the mirror providing that image by a
distance of not less than 3 minutes of
arc.
(b) The image required by S9.3(a)(1) of
cylinder P shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) The angular size of the shortest
dimension of that cylinder’s image shall
be not less than 3 minutes of arc; and
(2) The angular size of the longest
dimension of that cylinder’s image shall
be not less than 9 minutes of arc.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–55519 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to
implement Amendment 6 to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Shrimp
Fishery of the South Atlantic Region
(FMP), as prepared and submitted by
the South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council). This final rule
requires an owner or operator of a
trawler that harvests or possesses
penaeid shrimp (brown, pink, or white
shrimp) in or from the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off the southern
Atlantic states to obtain a commercial
vessel permit for South Atlantic penaeid
shrimp; requires an owner or operator of
a vessel in the South Atlantic rock
shrimp or penaeid shrimp fishery to
submit catch and effort reports and to
carry an observer on selected trips; and
requires bycatch reduction devices
(BRDs) in nets in the rock shrimp
fishery. In addition, this final rule
removes provisions of the regulations
applicable to other fisheries off the
southern Atlantic states that are no
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
*
longer applicable and makes minor
corrections. Amendment 6 also
establishes stock status determination
criteria for South Atlantic penaeid
shrimp; revises the specifications of
maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and
optimum yield (OY) for South Atlantic
rock shrimp; revises the stock status
determination criteria for South Atlantic
rock shrimp; revises the bycatch
reduction criterion for the certification
of BRDs; and transfers from the Council
to the Regional Administrator,
Southeast Region, NMFS (RA),
responsibilities for the specification of
the protocol for testing BRDs. In
addition, NMFS informs the public of
the approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) of the
collection-of-information requirements
contained in this final rule and
publishes the OMB control numbers for
those collections. The intended effects
of this rule are to provide additional
information for, and improve the
effective management of, the shrimp
fisheries off the southern Atlantic states
and to correct and clarify the regulations
applicable to other southern Atlantic
fisheries.
This final rule is effective
January 11, 2006, except for
§ 622.4(a)(2)(xiii) which is effective
April 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) and
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) are
available from NMFS, Southeast
Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue
South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
telephone 727–824–5305; fax 727–824–
5308.
Comments regarding the burden-hour
estimates or other aspects of the
collection-of-information requirements
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
73384
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
contained in this final rule may be
submitted in writing to Jason Rueter at
the Southeast Regional Office address
(above) and to David Rostker, OMB, by
e-mail at DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov,
or by fax to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Branstetter, telephone: 727–551–
5796; fax: 727–824–5308; e-mail:
Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
The
shrimp fishery in the EEZ off the South
Atlantic states is managed under the
FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
Council and is implemented under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
NMFS approved Amendment 6 on
May 26, 2005. NMFS published the
proposed rule to implement
Amendment 6 and requested public
comment on the proposed rule through
July 11, 2005 (70 FR 30666, May 27,
2005). The rationale for the measures in
Amendment 6 is provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule and is not
repeated here.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments and Responses
NMFS received two letters during the
respective comment periods on the
amendment and the proposed rule. The
letters contained comments on two
issues. NMFS’ responses to those
comments are provided below.
Comment 1: The regulation to require
a Federal vessel permit for vessels
shrimping in or traveling through the
South Atlantic EEZ is unnecessarily
burdensome on an already stressed
fishery. Existing state data collection
programs are adequate.
Response: The information collected
through existing Federal and state vessel
registration or licensing programs is not
comprehensive or specific to the
identification of shrimp vessels fishing
in the EEZ. Most shrimp fishing effort
in the South Atlantic region occurs in
state waters, and there is limited
information regarding the effort
expended in Federal waters. The
Council concluded that a Federal vessel
permit requirement for the penaeid
shrimp fishery in the South Atlantic
EEZ was necessary to accurately
identify the universe of vessels that fish
for shrimp in the EEZ.
Comment 2: To maintain a valid
shrimp vessel permit, the vessel owner
is required to carry a Federal observer,
if selected. This is an unnecessary and
obtrusive proposal.
Response: The Magnuson-Stevens Act
requires Councils to include a
standardized methodology to assess
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
bycatch in each fishery. Data collected
from at-sea observer programs are
considered to be the most reliable
method for estimating bycatch. Better
information, collected through an
observer program, would facilitate
scientific assessments of annual fishing
effort, catch, and bycatch. This
information would, in turn, aid in the
formulation of sound management
measures for the shrimp fishery and
those finfish fisheries that are impacted
because of bycatch mortality resulting
from the shrimp fishery.
Classification
The Administrator, Southeast Region,
NMFS, determined that Amendment 6
is necessary for the conservation and
management of the South Atlantic
shrimp fishery and that Amendment 6
is consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
The Council prepared an FSEIS for
Amendment 6; the FSEIS was filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
on March 18, 2005; a notice of
availability was published on March 25,
2005 (70 FR 15314). The FSEIS
evaluates the environmental effects of a
number of actions proposed to improve
the conservation and management of
shrimp stocks. The analysis indicates
the preferred alternatives will benefit
the quality of the human environment
over the long term by simplifying the
administrative process associated with
approving new bycatch reduction
devices, advancing understanding of
bycatch and fishery participants, and
providing reference points to use in
evaluating stock status and fishery
performance.
NMFS prepared a FRFA for this rule.
The FRFA incorporates the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), a
summary of the significant issues raised
by the public comments in response to
the IRFA, NMFS responses to those
comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support the
action. A summary of the analysis
follows.
To satisfy the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Council has
proposed eight actions to amend the
Shrimp Fishery Management Plan of the
South Atlantic Region. These actions are
intended to improve the identification
and quantification of bycatch from
penaeid shrimp (brown, pink, or white
shrimp) and rock shrimp trawls;
improve the identification and
quantification of the known universe of
penaeid shrimp vessels; reduce the
bycatch from rock shrimp trawls;
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
promote the use of more effective BRDs
by amending the BRD framework
system; and establish status
determination criteria, or proxies
thereof, as necessary, for penaeid and
rock shrimp stocks.
This final rule: (1) requires an owner
or operator of a trawler that harvests or
possesses penaeid shrimp in or from the
EEZ off the southern Atlantic states to
obtain a commercial vessel permit for
South Atlantic penaeid shrimp; (2)
requires an owner or operator of a vessel
in the South Atlantic rock shrimp or
penaeid shrimp fishery to submit catch
and effort reports and to carry an
observer on selected trips; and (3)
requires BRDs in nets in the rock shrimp
fishery. In addition, Amendment 6
establishes stock status determination
criteria for South Atlantic penaeid
shrimp; revises the specifications of
maximum sustainable yield and
optimum yield for South Atlantic rock
shrimp; revises the stock status
determination criteria for South Atlantic
rock shrimp; revises the bycatch
reduction criterion for the certification
of BRDs; and transfers from the Council
to the Regional Administrator,
Southeast Region, NMFS (RA),
responsibilities for the specification of
the protocol for testing BRDs. In this
final rule, NMFS also removes
provisions of the regulations applicable
to other fisheries off the southern
Atlantic states that are no longer
applicable and makes minor corrections.
The intended effects of this rule are to
provide additional information for, and
otherwise improve the effective
management of, the shrimp fisheries off
the southern Atlantic states and to
correct and clarify the regulations
applicable to other southern Atlantic
fisheries. The Magnuson-Stevens Act
provides the legal basis for this rule.
NMFS received two letters during the
public comment period on the proposed
rule. The commenters alleged that the
vessel permit requirement and the
requirement to accommodate an
observer aboard the vessel, if selected to
do so, were unnecessary and
burdensome. NMFS’ responses state that
the vessel permit is necessary to
properly identify the universe of vessels
participating in the fishery, and
observer coverage is the most reliable
method for estimating bycatch, for
compliance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act requirement to establish a
standardized methodology for assessing
bycatch in the fishery. Therefore, no
changes were made in the final rule as
a result of these comments.
The measures in this final rule apply
to the commercial harvesting sector
active in the penaeid and rock shrimp
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
fisheries in the South Atlantic. The
Small Business Administration defines
a small business that engages in
commercial fishing as a firm that is
independently owned and operated, is
not dominant in its field of operation,
and has annual receipts up to $3.5
million per year.
It is estimated that there were at least
2,129, 1,835, and 1,731 commercial
entities harvesting shrimp in the South
Atlantic during 2000, 2001, and 2002,
respectively. The average annual gross
revenue per vessel from all commercial
fishing activities by these vessels for
2000–2002 is estimated to be $76,879,
$67,706, and $66,853, respectively. The
rock shrimp fishery is a sub-sector of the
shrimp fishery. The number of active
vessels in this sector was 182, 159, and
148 for 2000–2002, respectively. Since
July 2003, a limited access rock shrimp
endorsement has been required onboard
a vessel to fish for or possess rock
shrimp in the South Atlantic EEZ off
Georgia and Florida. To date, 145
limited access endorsements have been
issued. The average revenue per rock
shrimp vessel from 2000–2002 is
estimated to be $241,079, $239,861 and
$192,502, respectively. The highest
gross revenue observed for a single
vessel in the shrimp fishery during
2000–2002, regardless of species focus,
did not exceed $1.0 million. There are
insufficient data regarding potential
ownership affiliation between vessels to
identify whether an individual entity
controlled sufficient numbers of vessels
to achieve large entity status. Therefore,
it is assumed that each vessel represents
a separate business entity and, based on
the revenue profiles provided above, all
entities in the South Atlantic shrimp
fishery are assumed to be small entities.
The actions to implement a Federal
penaeid shrimp permit program, require
logbook reporting, and require the use of
BRDs on the rock shrimp vessels are
expected to have direct impacts on the
entities that participate in these
fisheries. The requirement for a sample
of vessels to carry observers is not
expected to generate direct impacts on
the affected entities because NMFS is
covering all costs associated with this
program. All the other actions are either
administrative or establish fishery
benchmark criteria that would not
directly affect fishery participants.
The requirement for permits in the
penaeid shrimp fishery is expected to
affect 1,380 to 1,898 vessels. The lower
bound assumes that only those
commercial shrimp vessels that operate
in state offshore and Federal waters in
the South Atlantic would apply for the
permit and is the average number of
vessels estimated to operate in these
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
waters per year during 2000–2002. The
upper bound assumes that all
commercial shrimp vessels that operate
in the South Atlantic, regardless of
whether they typically fish in inshore or
offshore waters, would apply for the
permit and is the average number of
vessels estimated to operate per year
during 2000–2002. It is expected that all
rock shrimp vessels would apply for the
penaeid shrimp permit, and the
estimates include these vessels. The cost
of the penaeid shrimp permit would be
either $50 or $20, depending upon
whether the permit is the only permit
held by the vessel, therefore costing $50,
or whether it represents an additional
permit, thus costing only $20. Since all
vessels operating in the rock shrimp
fishery are currently already required to
have a rock shrimp permit, the penaeid
shrimp permit would cost only $20 for
these vessels.
Under the final rule, a sample of
vessels that are issued the Federal
penaeid shrimp permit would be
selected for reporting through a logbook
program. The sample size has not been
determined and, hence, it is unknown
how many small entities would have to
comply with this new reporting
requirement. Data elements would
include, but not necessarily be limited
to: vessel name, vessel identifier,
number of nets, type of net, size of net,
type of bycatch reduction device,
number of tows, length of tows (in
hours), location of tow (either in terms
of latitude and longitude or statistical
area and depth) and an estimate of
catch. The logbook would be completed
on a daily basis. Completion of the
logbook is estimated to take 10 minutes
per daily form. Based on data from the
Florida trip ticket program, the average
east coast shrimp vessel averages 61.5
fishing days per year. At 10 minutes per
day to complete the logbook, the average
annual reporting burden per vessel
would be 615 minutes, or 10.25 hours.
Using the average wage of first line
supervisors/managers in the fishing,
forestry, and farming industries from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, $18.14, the
average annual opportunity cost per
vessel for logbook reporting would be
approximately $185.94 ($18.14/hour X
10.25 hours). Completion of the form is
not expected to adversely affect other
trip or maintenance activities.
The action to require BRDs in the rock
shrimp fishery is expected to affect the
profitability of an estimated 43 vessels,
or approximately 30 percent of this subsector of the shrimp fishery. The other
vessels in this sub-sector are assumed to
already utilize BRDs due to their
concurrent participation in the penaeid
shrimp fishery, which already requires
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73385
the use of BRDs if the proportion of
penaeid shrimp exceeds 1 percent. The
use of BRDs is estimated to result in a
maximum of 3 percent shrimp loss on
rock shrimp trips. This amounts to a
reduction of $1,382 in gross revenue per
vessel, or 0.6 percent reduction in
revenue per affected vessel in the rock
shrimp fishery.
The determination of significant
economic impact can be ascertained by
examining two issues:
disproportionality and profitability. The
disproportionality question is: Will the
regulations place a substantial number
of small entities at a significant
competitive disadvantage to large
entities? All entities participating in the
respective shrimp fisheries are
considered small entities, so the issue of
disproportionality does not arise.
However, there is a high degree of
diversity among the vessels in the
shrimp fleet in terms of vessel length
and variation in overall gross fishing
income, vessel operating and fixed
costs, and dependence on income from
shrimp harvest are all related to vessel
length. Nevertheless, as discussed
below, the costs of the actions are not
expected to be great enough to affect
competitive advantage.
The profitability question is: Do the
regulations significantly reduce profit
for a substantial number of small
entities? The current profitability of
vessels in the commercial shrimp
fishery that are likely to be affected by
the measures in this amendment is
unknown. Existing studies on the
shrimp fleet in the South Atlantic are
dated and not reflective of the current
conditions in this fishery. Imports have
had a substantial negative effect on the
profitability of vessels in the domestic
shrimp industry since the 1990s. A
study on the penaeid shrimp fishery off
South Carolina during 1999 indicated
that many vessels were operating on
break-even levels of activity. This
fishery was classified into three
operational size categories based on
differences in operating costs, profit
margins and ability of the vessel owner
to make input substitutions. Small
vessels (less than 30 ft(9 m)) had an
average annual profitability of $2,533,
medium vessels $10,086, and large
vessels $8,639. It is not known whether
these data were representative of the
shrimp fleet in the other South Atlantic
states. Regardless, current profit margins
are expected to be lower as a result of
the decline in prices since 1999, and
increases in fuel prices and other input
costs.
The average annual revenue from all
commercial fishing activities, for shrimp
vessels operating in the South Atlantic
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
73386
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
during 2000–2002 ranged from $70,749
for vessels that fished in either or both
inshore and offshore waters to $81,362
for vessels that operated only in offshore
waters. The annual cost of a permit
would be only $50 if the vessel obtained
a single permit, or $20 if the vessel
possessed multiple permits and, thus,
would represent a small additional
operational cost. A time burden would
also be imposed in order to complete
the permit application form. This time
burden is estimated to be 0.33 hours per
application, with an opportunity cost of
approximately $6. There will not,
however, be any additional actual
expenditures other than to cover
postage. The burden associated with
logbook reporting is similarly a time
cost, estimated to have an opportunity
cost of $185.94 per vessel, as discussed
above, and is not expected to adversely
affect operation or productivity of the
vessel and, thus, not impose any direct
financial costs.
The BRD requirement for the rock
shrimp sector is expected to impact
those vessels that do not currently
utilize BRDs. As previously stated, it is
estimated that the majority of vessels in
this fishery currently have BRDs, but
that an estimated 43 vessels will be
affected by this action. The estimated
cost of the BRD-induced shrimp loss is
$1,382 in gross revenue per vessel, or a
0.6 percent reduction in revenue per
affected vessel. Additionally, BRDs are
estimated to cost $20-$100 each, or $80$400 per vessel since most rock shrimp
vessels pull four nets. Combining the
revenue loss ($1,382), penaeid shrimp
permit cost ($20 since the vessel would
already have the rock shrimp permit),
and assuming the maximum BRD cost
($400), these 43 rock shrimp vessels
would be expected to incur $1,802 in
reduced revenues or increased costs, an
amount less than 1 percent of average
annual revenues. It should be noted,
however, that ex-vessel shrimp price
reductions and fuel price increases
since 2002 have substantially reduced
the profitability of shrimp vessels,
thereby increasing the potential net
impact of the BRD requirements in this
final rule.
This final rule requires any trawler
fishing for or in possession of penaeid
shrimp in or from Federal waters to
possess a Federal penaeid shrimp
permit and to provide the information
specified on the permit application.
Selected vessels would also have to
complete logbook forms at the end of
each trip. The information required for
the permit application and logbook are
standard information and data elements
necessary for the routine operation of a
fishing business and are not expected to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
impose any reporting or record keeping
requirements that are especially difficult
or burdensome. The permit application
process, vessel marking requirements,
and requirements for notification of
vessel trips selected for observer
coverage do not require any professional
skills that vessel owners and operators
do not already possess.
Three alternatives were considered to
the final rule requirement to obtain a
penaeid shrimp permit. The status quo
alternative would not require a permit
and, therefore, would eliminate all costs
associated with the permit. This
alternative, however, would not meet
the Council’s objective of allowing for
the efficient and accurate identification
of vessels in the shrimp fishery, and the
indirect economic benefits from better
data collection and management would
not be realized. Two alternatives to the
final rule would require shrimp trawlers
to purchase a Federal penaeid shrimp
permit, like the proposed action, but
would allow exemptions for vessels in
transit with properly stowed gear. These
two alternatives, however, differ in the
qualification requirements, one
alternative granting a permit for anyone
who applied, as would the final rule,
while the other alternative would
require documentation of a state permit.
Neither of these alternatives would
reduce the costs to those who operate in
the South Atlantic fishery, but they
would eliminate the additional permit
cost for vessels that operate outside the
region and wish only to transit or land
shrimp in the South Atlantic. Both
alternatives, however, would produce
law enforcement loopholes that could
lower compliance rates, thus
jeopardizing the expected benefits of the
final rule and would not meet the
Council’s objectives.
Three alternatives were considered to
the logbook and observer requirements.
The status quo alternative, not requiring
a logbook, would not support the
collection of necessary bycatch
information and would not, therefore,
meet the Council’s objectives. A second
alternative would adopt the Atlantic
Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program.
However, NMFS does not have the
ability to fully implement the program
at this time, particularly with respect to
the desired level of observer coverage.
Further, this program does not
necessarily require the use of logbooks,
and, thus, might not generate accurate
effort information that is necessary to
produce accurate estimates of bycatch,
which would be contrary to the
Council’s objectives. As with the
preferred action, the third alternative
would require paper logbooks, but does
not contemplate the eventual adoption
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative
Statistics Program, particularly with
respect to the desired level of observer
coverage, which is contrary to the
Council’s objectives. These alternatives
were not selected because, while they
would impose time costs on the fishery
participants comparable to those of the
final rule (and, thus, would not lessen
the impact on the small business
entities), they would not fully meet the
Council’s objectives. The final rule
would provide a more systematic
interim data collection approach until
the more comprehensive Atlantic coastwide bycatch program developed by the
Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics
Program is funded and implemented.
Four alternatives were considered to
the BRD requirement for rock shrimp
vessels. The no action alternative would
not provide any reduction in bycatch
and would not, therefore, meet the
Council’s objectives. The remaining
three alternatives would impose
seasonal closures (fall, winter, or
summer) to address the bycatch
problem. Each of these alternatives
would result in greater economic losses
than the final rule, ranging from a
$5,901 reduction in gross revenues per
vessel per year for a winter closure to
$42,363 for a summer closure, compared
to an estimated maximum loss of $1,382
under the BRD requirement. The
projected losses under the summer and
fall closures would likely be sufficiently
great to force some vessels to exit the
industry. While seasonal closures would
likely result in larger total bycatch
reductions than the final rule, the final
rule better meets the Council’s
objectives while minimizing the social
and economic consequences. A copy of
this analysis is available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES).
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare an FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ As part of this
rulemaking process, NMFS prepared a
fishery bulletin, which also serves as a
small entity compliance guide. The
fishery bulletin will be sent to all permit
holders for the South Atlantic shrimp
fishery.
No duplicative, overlapping or
conflicting Federal rules were identified
in the IRFA for this rule.
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which
have been approved by OMB. The
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
permit-related requirements have been
approved under OMB control number
0648–0205; vessel identification
requirements have been approved under
OMB control number 0648–0358; and
logbook requirements have been
approved under OMB control number
0648–0016. The requirements for
notification of vessel trips related to
observers and the reporting
requirements related to BRDs were
previously approved under OMB
control numbers 0648–0205. The public
reporting burden for requirements for:
(1) submission of applications for
commercial vessel permits for the
penaeid shrimp fishery; (2)
identification of such permitted vessels,
i.e., vessel marking requirements; (3)
submission of logbooks by permitted
vessels in the rock shrimp and penaeid
shrimp fisheries; (4) notification of
vessel trips in the rock shrimp and
penaeid shrimp fisheries related to
vessel observers; and (5) applications for
testing proposed bycatch reduction
devices, conducting such tests, and
reporting the results of tests, as
prescribed by the Bycatch Reduction
Device Testing Protocol Manual are
estimated to average 20 minutes per
response for each permit application, 45
minutes for each vessel to be identified,
10 minutes for each logbook
submission, 5 minutes for each
notification of a vessel trip, and 186
hours per respondent for the
requirements prescribed by the Bycatch
Reduction Device Testing Protocol
Manual. These estimates of the public
reporting burdens include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the
collections of information. Send
comments regarding these burden
estimates or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS and to
OMB (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), unless that
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
Dated: December 6, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
I
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.2, the definition of
‘‘Penaeid shrimp trawler’’ is revised and
the definition of ‘‘Penaeid shrimp’’ is
added in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
I
§ 622.2
Definitions and acronyms.
*
*
*
*
*
Penaeid shrimp means one or more of
the following species, or a part thereof:
(1) Brown shrimp, Farfantepenaeus
aztecus.
(2) Pink shrimp, Farfantepenaeus
duorarum.
§ 622.5
Penaeid shrimp trawler means any
vessel that is equipped with one or more
trawl nets whose on-board or landed
catch of penaeid shrimp is more than 1
percent, by weight, of all fish
comprising its on-board or landed catch.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. In § 622.4, paragraph (a)(1)(iii) is
removed; in the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(B), the phrase
‘‘effective July 15, 2003,’’ is removed;
paragraph (r)(12) is removed; paragraph
(a)(1)(iv) is redesignated as (a)(1)(iii);
and paragraph (a)(2)(xiii) is added to
read as follows:
§ 622.4
Permits and fees.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(xiii) South Atlantic penaeid shrimp.
For a person aboard a trawler to fish for
penaeid shrimp in the South Atlantic
EEZ or possess penaeid shrimp in or
from the South Atlantic EEZ, a valid
commercial vessel permit for South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp must have been
issued to the vessel and must be on
board.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. In § 622.5, the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(2)(i) is revised and
paragraph (a)(1)(vii) is added to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Recordkeeping and reporting.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(vii) South Atlantic rock or penaeid
shrimp. The owner or operator of a
vessel for which a commercial permit
for South Atlantic rock shrimp or South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp has been
issued, as required under
§ 622.4(a)(2)(viii) or (xiii), respectively,
or whose vessel fishes for or lands
South Atlantic rock shrimp or South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp in or from state
waters adjoining the Atlantic EEZ, who
is selected to report by the SRD must
maintain a fishing record on a form
available from the SRD and must submit
such record as specified in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
(2) * * *
(i) Completed fishing records required
by paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), (iv), (vi), and
(vii) of this section must be submitted
to the SRD postmarked not later than 7
days after the end of each fishing trip.
***
*
*
*
*
*
I 5. In § 622.7, paragraphs (aa) and (cc)
are revised to read as follows:
§ 622.7
(3) White shrimp, Litopenaeus
setiferus.
73387
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(aa) Falsify information submitted
regarding an application for testing a
BRD or regarding testing of a BRD, as
specified in § 622.41(g)(3)(i) or (h)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(cc) Operate or own a vessel that is
required to have a permitted operator
aboard when the vessel is at sea or
offloading without such operator
aboard, as specified in § 622.4(a)(5)(i)
through (iv).
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. In § 622.8, paragraph (a)(4) is added
to read as follows:
§ 622.8
At-sea observer coverage.
(a) * * *
(4) South Atlantic rock or penaeid
shrimp. A vessel for which a Federal
commercial permit for South Atlantic
rock shrimp or South Atlantic penaeid
shrimp has been issued must carry a
NMFS-approved observer, if the vessel’s
trip is selected by the SRD for observer
coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
I 7. In § 622.9, the first sentence of
paragraph (a) is revised to read as
follows:
§ 622.9 Vessel monitoring systems
(VMSs).
(a) Requirement for use. An owner or
operator of a vessel that has been issued
a limited access endorsement for South
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
73388
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
Atlantic rock shrimp must ensure that
such vessel has a NMFS-approved,
operating VMS on board when on a trip
in the South Atlantic. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
I 8. In § 622.17, paragraph (a) is revised
to read as follows:
§ 622.17 South Atlantic golden crab
controlled access.
(a) General. In accordance with the
procedures specified in the Fishery
Management Plan for the Golden Crab
Fishery of the South Atlantic Region,
initial commercial vessel permits have
been issued for the fishery. All permits
in the fishery are issued on a fishingyear (calendar-year) basis. No additional
permits may be issued except for the
northern zone as follows:
(1) The RA will issue up to two new
vessel permits for the northern zone.
Selection will be made from the list of
historical participants in the South
Atlantic golden crab fishery. Such list
was used at the October 1995 meeting
of the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council and was
prioritized based on pounds of golden
crab landed, without reference to a
specific zone. Individuals on the list
who originally received permits will be
deleted from the list.
(2) The RA will offer in writing an
opportunity to apply for a permit for the
northern zone to the individuals highest
on the list until two individuals accept
and apply in a timely manner. An offer
that is not accepted within 30 days after
it is received will no longer be valid.
(3) An application for a permit from
an individual who accepts the RA’s
offer must be received by the RA no
later than 30 days after the date of the
individual’s acceptance. Application
forms are available from the RA.
(4) A vessel permit for the northern
zone issued under paragraph (a)(1) of
this section, and any successor permit,
may not be changed to another zone. A
successor permit includes a permit
issued to that vessel for a subsequent
owner and a permit issued via transfer
from that vessel to another vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
I 9. Section 622.18 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 622.18 South Atlantic snapper-grouper
limited access.
(a) General. The only valid
commercial vessel permits for South
Atlantic snapper-grouper are those that
have been issued under the limited
access criteria specified in the Fishery
Management Plan for the SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region. A commercial vessel permit for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
South Atlantic snapper-grouper is either
a transferable commercial permit or a
trip-limited commercial permit.
(b) Transfers of permits. A snappergrouper limited access permit is valid
only for the vessel and owner named on
the permit. To change either the vessel
or the owner, an application for transfer
must be submitted to the RA.
(1) Transferable permits. (i) An owner
of a vessel with a transferable permit
may request that the RA transfer the
permit to another vessel owned by the
same entity.
(ii) A transferable permit may be
transferred upon a change of ownership
of a permitted vessel with such permit
from one to another of the following:
husband, wife, son, daughter, brother,
sister, mother, or father.
(iii) Except as provided in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section, a person
desiring to acquire a limited access,
transferable permit for South Atlantic
snapper-grouper must obtain and
exchange two such permits for one new
permit.
(iv) A transfer of a permit that is
undertaken under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of
this section will constitute a transfer of
the vessel’s entire catch history to the
new owner.
(2) Trip-limited permits. An owner of
a vessel with a trip- limited permit may
request that the RA transfer the permit
to another vessel owned by the same
entity.
(c) Renewal. NMFS will not reissue a
commercial vessel permit for South
Atlantic snapper-grouper if the permit is
revoked or if the RA does not receive an
application for renewal within 60 days
of the permit’s expiration date.
I 10. Section 622.19 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 622.19 South Atlantic rock shrimp
limited access.
(a) Applicability. For a person aboard
a vessel to fish for rock shrimp in the
South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia or off
Florida or possess rock shrimp in or
from the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia
or off Florida, a limited access
endorsement for South Atlantic rock
shrimp must be issued to the vessel and
must be on board.
(b) Transfer of an endorsement. A
limited access endorsement for South
Atlantic rock shrimp is valid only for
the vessel and owner named on the
permit/endorsement. To change either
the vessel or the owner, an application
for transfer must be submitted to the
RA. An owner of a vessel with an
endorsement may request that the RA
transfer the endorsement to another
vessel owned by the same entity, to the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
same vessel owned by another entity, or
to another vessel with another owner. A
transfer of an endorsement under this
paragraph will include the transfer of
the vessel’s entire catch history of South
Atlantic rock shrimp to a new owner; no
partial transfers are allowed.
(c) Renewal. The RA will not reissue
a limited access endorsement for South
Atlantic rock shrimp if the endorsement
is revoked or if the RA does not receive
a complete application for renewal of
the endorsement within 1 year after the
endorsement’s expiration date.
(d) Non-renewal of inactive
endorsements. In addition to the
sanctions and denials specified in
§ 622.4(j)(1), a limited access
endorsement for South Atlantic rock
shrimp that is inactive for a period of 4
consecutive calendar years will not be
renewed. For the purpose of this
paragraph, ‘‘inactive’’ means that the
vessel with the endorsement has not
landed at least 15,000 lb (6,804 kg) of
rock shrimp from the South Atlantic
EEZ in a calendar year.
(e) Reissuance of non-renewed
permits. A permit that is not renewed
under paragraph (d) of this section will
be made available to a vessel owner
randomly selected from a list of owners
who had documented landings of rock
shrimp from the South Atlantic EEZ
prior to 1996 but who did not qualify for
an initial limited access endorsement.
Owners’ names have been placed on the
list in accordance with the procedures
specified in the FMP for the Shrimp
Fishery of the South Atlantic Region.
I 11. In § 622.41, paragraph (g) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 622.41
Species specific limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Rock and penaeid shrimp in the
South Atlantic--(1) BRD requirements.
Except as exempted in paragraph (g)(4)
of this section, BRDs are required as
follows:
(i) On a penaeid shrimp trawler in the
South Atlantic EEZ, each trawl net that
is rigged for fishing and has a mesh size
less than 2.50 inches (6.35 cm), as
measured between the centers of
opposite knots when pulled taut, and
each try net that is rigged for fishing and
has a headrope length longer than 16.0
ft (4.9 m), must have a certified BRD
installed.
(ii) On a vessel that fishes for or
possesses rock shrimp in the South
Atlantic EEZ, each trawl net or try net
that is rigged for fishing must have a
certified BRD installed.
(iii) A trawl net or try net is rigged for
fishing if it is in the water, or if it is
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
shackled, tied, or otherwise connected
to a sled, door, or other device that
spreads the net, or to a tow rope, cable,
pole, or extension, either on board or
attached to a shrimp trawler.
(2) Certified BRDs. The following
BRDs are certified for use in the South
Atlantic EEZ. Specifications of these
certified BRDs are contained in
Appendix D of this part.
(i) Extended funnel.
(ii) Expanded mesh.
(iii) Fisheye.
(iv) Gulf fisheye.
(v) Jones-Davis.
(3) Certification of additional BRDs.
(i) A person who proposes a BRD for
certification for use in the South
Atlantic EEZ must submit an
application to test such BRD, conduct
the testing, and submit the results of the
test in accordance with the Bycatch
Reduction Device Testing Protocol
Manual, which is available from the RA
upon request.
(ii) For a new BRD to be certified, it
must be statistically demonstrated that
in testing under the Bycatch Reduction
Device Testing Protocol Manual the BRD
can reduce the total weight of finfish
taken as bycatch by at least 30 percent.
(iii) If a BRD meets the certification
criterion, as determined under the
testing protocol, NMFS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register adding
the BRD to the list of certified BRDs in
paragraph (g)(2) of this section and
providing the specifications for the
newly certified BRD, including any
special conditions deemed appropriate
based on the certification testing results.
(4) Limited exemption. A rock or
penaeid shrimp trawler that is
authorized by the RA to test a BRD in
the EEZ for possible certification, has
such written authorization on board,
and is conducting such test in
accordance with the Bycatch Reduction
Device Testing Protocol Manual is
granted a limited exemption from the
BRD requirement specified in paragraph
(g)(1) of this section. The exemption
from the BRD requirement is limited to
those trawls that are being used in the
certification trials. All other trawls
rigged for fishing must be equipped
with certified BRDs.
*
*
*
*
*
I 12. In Table 4 of Appendix A to Part
622—South Atlantic Snapper-Grouper,
the section heading, Serranidae–Sea
Basses and Groupers, and the species
listed under that heading are revised to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 622—Species
Tables
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
15:45 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
Table 4 of Appendix A to Part 622—
South Atlantic Snapper-Grouper
*
*
*
*
*
Serranidae—Groupers
Rock hind, Epinephelus adscensionis
Graysby, Epinephelus cruentatus
Speckled hind, Epinephelus
drummondhayi
Yellowedge grouper, Epinephelus
flavolimbatus
Coney, Epinephelus fulvus
Red hind, Epinephelus guttatus
Goliath grouper, Epinephelus itajara
Red grouper, Epinephelus morio
Misty grouper, Epinephelus
mystacinus
Warsaw grouper, Epinephelus nigritus
Snowy grouper, Epinephelus niveatus
Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus
Black grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci
Yellowmouth grouper, Mycteroperca
interstitialis
Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis
Scamp, Mycteroperca phenax
Tiger grouper, Mycteroperca tigris
Yellowfin grouper, Mycteroperca
venenosa
Serranidae—Sea Basses
Bank sea bass, Centropristis ocyurus
Rock sea bass, Centropristis
philadelphica
Black sea bass, Centropristis striata
*
*
*
*
*
PART 622—[Nomenclature change]
13. In part 622, revise all references to
‘‘jewfish’’ to read ‘‘goliath grouper’’
wherever it appears.
[FR Doc. 05–23929 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D.
120705A]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod by
Catcher Vessels 60 feet (18.3 Meters)
Length Overall and Longer Using
Hook-and-line Gear in the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for Pacific cod by catcher vessels
60 feet (18.3 meters (m)) length overall
(LOA) and longer using hook-and-line
gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
73389
Islands management area (BSAI). This
action is necessary to prevent exceeding
the 2005 total allowable catch (TAC) of
Pacific cod specified for catcher vessels
60 feet (18.3 m) LOA and longer using
hook-and-line gear in the BSAI.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), December 7, 2005, until
2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh
Keaton, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
BSAI according to the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (FMP) prepared by
the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council under authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Regulations governing fishing by U.S.
vessels in accordance with the FMP
appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600
and 50 CFR part 679.
The 2005 Pacific cod TAC allocated to
catcher vessels 60 feet (18.3 m) LOA and
longer using hook-and-line gear in the
BSAI is 230 metric tons as established
by the 2005 and 2006 final harvest
specifications for groundfish in the
BSAI (70 FR 8979, February 24, 2005),
the reallocation on October 5, 2005 (70
FR 58983, October 11, 2005) and the
reallocation on November 21, 2005 (70
FR 71039, November 25, 2005). See
§ 679.20(c)(3)(iii) and (c)(5), and
(a)(7)(i)(C).
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(iii),
the Administrator, Alaska Region,
NMFS, has determined that the 2005
Pacific cod TAC allocated to catcher
vessels 60 feet (18.3 m) LOA and longer
using hook-and-line gear in the BSAI
has been reached. Consequently, NMFS
is prohibiting directed fishing for Pacific
cod by catcher vessels 60 feet (18.3 m)
LOA and longer using hook-and-line
gear in the BSAI.
After the effective date of this closure
the maximum retainable amounts at
§ 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time
during a trip.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
E:\FR\FM\12DER1.SGM
12DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 237 (Monday, December 12, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73383-73389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23929]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 050314071-5230-02; I.D. 030105E]
RIN 0648-AS16
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Shrimp Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Amendment 6
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this final rule to implement Amendment 6 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Shrimp Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region (FMP), as prepared and submitted by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council). This final rule requires an owner or
operator of a trawler that harvests or possesses penaeid shrimp (brown,
pink, or white shrimp) in or from the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off
the southern Atlantic states to obtain a commercial vessel permit for
South Atlantic penaeid shrimp; requires an owner or operator of a
vessel in the South Atlantic rock shrimp or penaeid shrimp fishery to
submit catch and effort reports and to carry an observer on selected
trips; and requires bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) in nets in the
rock shrimp fishery. In addition, this final rule removes provisions of
the regulations applicable to other fisheries off the southern Atlantic
states that are no longer applicable and makes minor corrections.
Amendment 6 also establishes stock status determination criteria for
South Atlantic penaeid shrimp; revises the specifications of maximum
sustainable yield (MSY) and optimum yield (OY) for South Atlantic rock
shrimp; revises the stock status determination criteria for South
Atlantic rock shrimp; revises the bycatch reduction criterion for the
certification of BRDs; and transfers from the Council to the Regional
Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS (RA), responsibilities for the
specification of the protocol for testing BRDs. In addition, NMFS
informs the public of the approval by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) of the collection-of-information requirements contained in
this final rule and publishes the OMB control numbers for those
collections. The intended effects of this rule are to provide
additional information for, and improve the effective management of,
the shrimp fisheries off the southern Atlantic states and to correct
and clarify the regulations applicable to other southern Atlantic
fisheries.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 11, 2006, except for Sec.
622.4(a)(2)(xiii) which is effective April 11, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) and
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) are available from NMFS, Southeast
Regional Office, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701;
telephone 727-824-5305; fax 727-824-5308.
Comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of
the collection-of-information requirements
[[Page 73384]]
contained in this final rule may be submitted in writing to Jason
Rueter at the Southeast Regional Office address (above) and to David
Rostker, OMB, by e-mail at David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to
202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Branstetter, telephone: 727-551-
5796; fax: 727-824-5308; e-mail: Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The shrimp fishery in the EEZ off the South
Atlantic states is managed under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the
Council and is implemented under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
NMFS approved Amendment 6 on May 26, 2005. NMFS published the
proposed rule to implement Amendment 6 and requested public comment on
the proposed rule through July 11, 2005 (70 FR 30666, May 27, 2005).
The rationale for the measures in Amendment 6 is provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule and is not repeated here.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received two letters during the respective comment periods on
the amendment and the proposed rule. The letters contained comments on
two issues. NMFS' responses to those comments are provided below.
Comment 1: The regulation to require a Federal vessel permit for
vessels shrimping in or traveling through the South Atlantic EEZ is
unnecessarily burdensome on an already stressed fishery. Existing state
data collection programs are adequate.
Response: The information collected through existing Federal and
state vessel registration or licensing programs is not comprehensive or
specific to the identification of shrimp vessels fishing in the EEZ.
Most shrimp fishing effort in the South Atlantic region occurs in state
waters, and there is limited information regarding the effort expended
in Federal waters. The Council concluded that a Federal vessel permit
requirement for the penaeid shrimp fishery in the South Atlantic EEZ
was necessary to accurately identify the universe of vessels that fish
for shrimp in the EEZ.
Comment 2: To maintain a valid shrimp vessel permit, the vessel
owner is required to carry a Federal observer, if selected. This is an
unnecessary and obtrusive proposal.
Response: The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires Councils to include a
standardized methodology to assess bycatch in each fishery. Data
collected from at-sea observer programs are considered to be the most
reliable method for estimating bycatch. Better information, collected
through an observer program, would facilitate scientific assessments of
annual fishing effort, catch, and bycatch. This information would, in
turn, aid in the formulation of sound management measures for the
shrimp fishery and those finfish fisheries that are impacted because of
bycatch mortality resulting from the shrimp fishery.
Classification
The Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS, determined that
Amendment 6 is necessary for the conservation and management of the
South Atlantic shrimp fishery and that Amendment 6 is consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be significant for purposes
of Executive Order 12866.
The Council prepared an FSEIS for Amendment 6; the FSEIS was filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency on March 18, 2005; a notice of
availability was published on March 25, 2005 (70 FR 15314). The FSEIS
evaluates the environmental effects of a number of actions proposed to
improve the conservation and management of shrimp stocks. The analysis
indicates the preferred alternatives will benefit the quality of the
human environment over the long term by simplifying the administrative
process associated with approving new bycatch reduction devices,
advancing understanding of bycatch and fishery participants, and
providing reference points to use in evaluating stock status and
fishery performance.
NMFS prepared a FRFA for this rule. The FRFA incorporates the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA), a summary of the
significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the
IRFA, NMFS responses to those comments, and a summary of the analyses
completed to support the action. A summary of the analysis follows.
To satisfy the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
Council has proposed eight actions to amend the Shrimp Fishery
Management Plan of the South Atlantic Region. These actions are
intended to improve the identification and quantification of bycatch
from penaeid shrimp (brown, pink, or white shrimp) and rock shrimp
trawls; improve the identification and quantification of the known
universe of penaeid shrimp vessels; reduce the bycatch from rock shrimp
trawls; promote the use of more effective BRDs by amending the BRD
framework system; and establish status determination criteria, or
proxies thereof, as necessary, for penaeid and rock shrimp stocks.
This final rule: (1) requires an owner or operator of a trawler
that harvests or possesses penaeid shrimp in or from the EEZ off the
southern Atlantic states to obtain a commercial vessel permit for South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp; (2) requires an owner or operator of a vessel
in the South Atlantic rock shrimp or penaeid shrimp fishery to submit
catch and effort reports and to carry an observer on selected trips;
and (3) requires BRDs in nets in the rock shrimp fishery. In addition,
Amendment 6 establishes stock status determination criteria for South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp; revises the specifications of maximum
sustainable yield and optimum yield for South Atlantic rock shrimp;
revises the stock status determination criteria for South Atlantic rock
shrimp; revises the bycatch reduction criterion for the certification
of BRDs; and transfers from the Council to the Regional Administrator,
Southeast Region, NMFS (RA), responsibilities for the specification of
the protocol for testing BRDs. In this final rule, NMFS also removes
provisions of the regulations applicable to other fisheries off the
southern Atlantic states that are no longer applicable and makes minor
corrections. The intended effects of this rule are to provide
additional information for, and otherwise improve the effective
management of, the shrimp fisheries off the southern Atlantic states
and to correct and clarify the regulations applicable to other southern
Atlantic fisheries. The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the legal basis
for this rule.
NMFS received two letters during the public comment period on the
proposed rule. The commenters alleged that the vessel permit
requirement and the requirement to accommodate an observer aboard the
vessel, if selected to do so, were unnecessary and burdensome. NMFS'
responses state that the vessel permit is necessary to properly
identify the universe of vessels participating in the fishery, and
observer coverage is the most reliable method for estimating bycatch,
for compliance with the Magnuson-Stevens Act requirement to establish a
standardized methodology for assessing bycatch in the fishery.
Therefore, no changes were made in the final rule as a result of these
comments.
The measures in this final rule apply to the commercial harvesting
sector active in the penaeid and rock shrimp
[[Page 73385]]
fisheries in the South Atlantic. The Small Business Administration
defines a small business that engages in commercial fishing as a firm
that is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field
of operation, and has annual receipts up to $3.5 million per year.
It is estimated that there were at least 2,129, 1,835, and 1,731
commercial entities harvesting shrimp in the South Atlantic during
2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. The average annual gross revenue
per vessel from all commercial fishing activities by these vessels for
2000-2002 is estimated to be $76,879, $67,706, and $66,853,
respectively. The rock shrimp fishery is a sub-sector of the shrimp
fishery. The number of active vessels in this sector was 182, 159, and
148 for 2000-2002, respectively. Since July 2003, a limited access rock
shrimp endorsement has been required onboard a vessel to fish for or
possess rock shrimp in the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia and Florida.
To date, 145 limited access endorsements have been issued. The average
revenue per rock shrimp vessel from 2000-2002 is estimated to be
$241,079, $239,861 and $192,502, respectively. The highest gross
revenue observed for a single vessel in the shrimp fishery during 2000-
2002, regardless of species focus, did not exceed $1.0 million. There
are insufficient data regarding potential ownership affiliation between
vessels to identify whether an individual entity controlled sufficient
numbers of vessels to achieve large entity status. Therefore, it is
assumed that each vessel represents a separate business entity and,
based on the revenue profiles provided above, all entities in the South
Atlantic shrimp fishery are assumed to be small entities.
The actions to implement a Federal penaeid shrimp permit program,
require logbook reporting, and require the use of BRDs on the rock
shrimp vessels are expected to have direct impacts on the entities that
participate in these fisheries. The requirement for a sample of vessels
to carry observers is not expected to generate direct impacts on the
affected entities because NMFS is covering all costs associated with
this program. All the other actions are either administrative or
establish fishery benchmark criteria that would not directly affect
fishery participants.
The requirement for permits in the penaeid shrimp fishery is
expected to affect 1,380 to 1,898 vessels. The lower bound assumes that
only those commercial shrimp vessels that operate in state offshore and
Federal waters in the South Atlantic would apply for the permit and is
the average number of vessels estimated to operate in these waters per
year during 2000-2002. The upper bound assumes that all commercial
shrimp vessels that operate in the South Atlantic, regardless of
whether they typically fish in inshore or offshore waters, would apply
for the permit and is the average number of vessels estimated to
operate per year during 2000-2002. It is expected that all rock shrimp
vessels would apply for the penaeid shrimp permit, and the estimates
include these vessels. The cost of the penaeid shrimp permit would be
either $50 or $20, depending upon whether the permit is the only permit
held by the vessel, therefore costing $50, or whether it represents an
additional permit, thus costing only $20. Since all vessels operating
in the rock shrimp fishery are currently already required to have a
rock shrimp permit, the penaeid shrimp permit would cost only $20 for
these vessels.
Under the final rule, a sample of vessels that are issued the
Federal penaeid shrimp permit would be selected for reporting through a
logbook program. The sample size has not been determined and, hence, it
is unknown how many small entities would have to comply with this new
reporting requirement. Data elements would include, but not necessarily
be limited to: vessel name, vessel identifier, number of nets, type of
net, size of net, type of bycatch reduction device, number of tows,
length of tows (in hours), location of tow (either in terms of latitude
and longitude or statistical area and depth) and an estimate of catch.
The logbook would be completed on a daily basis. Completion of the
logbook is estimated to take 10 minutes per daily form. Based on data
from the Florida trip ticket program, the average east coast shrimp
vessel averages 61.5 fishing days per year. At 10 minutes per day to
complete the logbook, the average annual reporting burden per vessel
would be 615 minutes, or 10.25 hours. Using the average wage of first
line supervisors/managers in the fishing, forestry, and farming
industries from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, $18.14, the average
annual opportunity cost per vessel for logbook reporting would be
approximately $185.94 ($18.14/hour X 10.25 hours). Completion of the
form is not expected to adversely affect other trip or maintenance
activities.
The action to require BRDs in the rock shrimp fishery is expected
to affect the profitability of an estimated 43 vessels, or
approximately 30 percent of this sub-sector of the shrimp fishery. The
other vessels in this sub-sector are assumed to already utilize BRDs
due to their concurrent participation in the penaeid shrimp fishery,
which already requires the use of BRDs if the proportion of penaeid
shrimp exceeds 1 percent. The use of BRDs is estimated to result in a
maximum of 3 percent shrimp loss on rock shrimp trips. This amounts to
a reduction of $1,382 in gross revenue per vessel, or 0.6 percent
reduction in revenue per affected vessel in the rock shrimp fishery.
The determination of significant economic impact can be ascertained
by examining two issues: disproportionality and profitability. The
disproportionality question is: Will the regulations place a
substantial number of small entities at a significant competitive
disadvantage to large entities? All entities participating in the
respective shrimp fisheries are considered small entities, so the issue
of disproportionality does not arise. However, there is a high degree
of diversity among the vessels in the shrimp fleet in terms of vessel
length and variation in overall gross fishing income, vessel operating
and fixed costs, and dependence on income from shrimp harvest are all
related to vessel length. Nevertheless, as discussed below, the costs
of the actions are not expected to be great enough to affect
competitive advantage.
The profitability question is: Do the regulations significantly
reduce profit for a substantial number of small entities? The current
profitability of vessels in the commercial shrimp fishery that are
likely to be affected by the measures in this amendment is unknown.
Existing studies on the shrimp fleet in the South Atlantic are dated
and not reflective of the current conditions in this fishery. Imports
have had a substantial negative effect on the profitability of vessels
in the domestic shrimp industry since the 1990s. A study on the penaeid
shrimp fishery off South Carolina during 1999 indicated that many
vessels were operating on break-even levels of activity. This fishery
was classified into three operational size categories based on
differences in operating costs, profit margins and ability of the
vessel owner to make input substitutions. Small vessels (less than 30
ft(9 m)) had an average annual profitability of $2,533, medium vessels
$10,086, and large vessels $8,639. It is not known whether these data
were representative of the shrimp fleet in the other South Atlantic
states. Regardless, current profit margins are expected to be lower as
a result of the decline in prices since 1999, and increases in fuel
prices and other input costs.
The average annual revenue from all commercial fishing activities,
for shrimp vessels operating in the South Atlantic
[[Page 73386]]
during 2000-2002 ranged from $70,749 for vessels that fished in either
or both inshore and offshore waters to $81,362 for vessels that
operated only in offshore waters. The annual cost of a permit would be
only $50 if the vessel obtained a single permit, or $20 if the vessel
possessed multiple permits and, thus, would represent a small
additional operational cost. A time burden would also be imposed in
order to complete the permit application form. This time burden is
estimated to be 0.33 hours per application, with an opportunity cost of
approximately $6. There will not, however, be any additional actual
expenditures other than to cover postage. The burden associated with
logbook reporting is similarly a time cost, estimated to have an
opportunity cost of $185.94 per vessel, as discussed above, and is not
expected to adversely affect operation or productivity of the vessel
and, thus, not impose any direct financial costs.
The BRD requirement for the rock shrimp sector is expected to
impact those vessels that do not currently utilize BRDs. As previously
stated, it is estimated that the majority of vessels in this fishery
currently have BRDs, but that an estimated 43 vessels will be affected
by this action. The estimated cost of the BRD-induced shrimp loss is
$1,382 in gross revenue per vessel, or a 0.6 percent reduction in
revenue per affected vessel. Additionally, BRDs are estimated to cost
$20-$100 each, or $80-$400 per vessel since most rock shrimp vessels
pull four nets. Combining the revenue loss ($1,382), penaeid shrimp
permit cost ($20 since the vessel would already have the rock shrimp
permit), and assuming the maximum BRD cost ($400), these 43 rock shrimp
vessels would be expected to incur $1,802 in reduced revenues or
increased costs, an amount less than 1 percent of average annual
revenues. It should be noted, however, that ex-vessel shrimp price
reductions and fuel price increases since 2002 have substantially
reduced the profitability of shrimp vessels, thereby increasing the
potential net impact of the BRD requirements in this final rule.
This final rule requires any trawler fishing for or in possession
of penaeid shrimp in or from Federal waters to possess a Federal
penaeid shrimp permit and to provide the information specified on the
permit application. Selected vessels would also have to complete
logbook forms at the end of each trip. The information required for the
permit application and logbook are standard information and data
elements necessary for the routine operation of a fishing business and
are not expected to impose any reporting or record keeping requirements
that are especially difficult or burdensome. The permit application
process, vessel marking requirements, and requirements for notification
of vessel trips selected for observer coverage do not require any
professional skills that vessel owners and operators do not already
possess.
Three alternatives were considered to the final rule requirement to
obtain a penaeid shrimp permit. The status quo alternative would not
require a permit and, therefore, would eliminate all costs associated
with the permit. This alternative, however, would not meet the
Council's objective of allowing for the efficient and accurate
identification of vessels in the shrimp fishery, and the indirect
economic benefits from better data collection and management would not
be realized. Two alternatives to the final rule would require shrimp
trawlers to purchase a Federal penaeid shrimp permit, like the proposed
action, but would allow exemptions for vessels in transit with properly
stowed gear. These two alternatives, however, differ in the
qualification requirements, one alternative granting a permit for
anyone who applied, as would the final rule, while the other
alternative would require documentation of a state permit. Neither of
these alternatives would reduce the costs to those who operate in the
South Atlantic fishery, but they would eliminate the additional permit
cost for vessels that operate outside the region and wish only to
transit or land shrimp in the South Atlantic. Both alternatives,
however, would produce law enforcement loopholes that could lower
compliance rates, thus jeopardizing the expected benefits of the final
rule and would not meet the Council's objectives.
Three alternatives were considered to the logbook and observer
requirements. The status quo alternative, not requiring a logbook,
would not support the collection of necessary bycatch information and
would not, therefore, meet the Council's objectives. A second
alternative would adopt the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics
Program. However, NMFS does not have the ability to fully implement the
program at this time, particularly with respect to the desired level of
observer coverage. Further, this program does not necessarily require
the use of logbooks, and, thus, might not generate accurate effort
information that is necessary to produce accurate estimates of bycatch,
which would be contrary to the Council's objectives. As with the
preferred action, the third alternative would require paper logbooks,
but does not contemplate the eventual adoption of the Atlantic Coastal
Cooperative Statistics Program, particularly with respect to the
desired level of observer coverage, which is contrary to the Council's
objectives. These alternatives were not selected because, while they
would impose time costs on the fishery participants comparable to those
of the final rule (and, thus, would not lessen the impact on the small
business entities), they would not fully meet the Council's objectives.
The final rule would provide a more systematic interim data collection
approach until the more comprehensive Atlantic coast-wide bycatch
program developed by the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics
Program is funded and implemented.
Four alternatives were considered to the BRD requirement for rock
shrimp vessels. The no action alternative would not provide any
reduction in bycatch and would not, therefore, meet the Council's
objectives. The remaining three alternatives would impose seasonal
closures (fall, winter, or summer) to address the bycatch problem. Each
of these alternatives would result in greater economic losses than the
final rule, ranging from a $5,901 reduction in gross revenues per
vessel per year for a winter closure to $42,363 for a summer closure,
compared to an estimated maximum loss of $1,382 under the BRD
requirement. The projected losses under the summer and fall closures
would likely be sufficiently great to force some vessels to exit the
industry. While seasonal closures would likely result in larger total
bycatch reductions than the final rule, the final rule better meets the
Council's objectives while minimizing the social and economic
consequences. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare an FRFA, the agency shall
publish one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such publications as ``small entity
compliance guides.'' As part of this rulemaking process, NMFS prepared
a fishery bulletin, which also serves as a small entity compliance
guide. The fishery bulletin will be sent to all permit holders for the
South Atlantic shrimp fishery.
No duplicative, overlapping or conflicting Federal rules were
identified in the IRFA for this rule.
This final rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which have been approved
by OMB. The
[[Page 73387]]
permit-related requirements have been approved under OMB control number
0648-0205; vessel identification requirements have been approved under
OMB control number 0648-0358; and logbook requirements have been
approved under OMB control number 0648-0016. The requirements for
notification of vessel trips related to observers and the reporting
requirements related to BRDs were previously approved under OMB control
numbers 0648-0205. The public reporting burden for requirements for:
(1) submission of applications for commercial vessel permits for the
penaeid shrimp fishery; (2) identification of such permitted vessels,
i.e., vessel marking requirements; (3) submission of logbooks by
permitted vessels in the rock shrimp and penaeid shrimp fisheries; (4)
notification of vessel trips in the rock shrimp and penaeid shrimp
fisheries related to vessel observers; and (5) applications for testing
proposed bycatch reduction devices, conducting such tests, and
reporting the results of tests, as prescribed by the Bycatch Reduction
Device Testing Protocol Manual are estimated to average 20 minutes per
response for each permit application, 45 minutes for each vessel to be
identified, 10 minutes for each logbook submission, 5 minutes for each
notification of a vessel trip, and 186 hours per respondent for the
requirements prescribed by the Bycatch Reduction Device Testing
Protocol Manual. These estimates of the public reporting burdens
include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collections of information. Send comments regarding these
burden estimates or any other aspect of this data collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS and to OMB (see
ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended as
follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 622.2, the definition of ``Penaeid shrimp trawler'' is
revised and the definition of ``Penaeid shrimp'' is added in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 622.2 Definitions and acronyms.
* * * * *
Penaeid shrimp means one or more of the following species, or a
part thereof:
(1) Brown shrimp, Farfantepenaeus aztecus.
(2) Pink shrimp, Farfantepenaeus duorarum.
(3) White shrimp, Litopenaeus setiferus.
Penaeid shrimp trawler means any vessel that is equipped with one
or more trawl nets whose on-board or landed catch of penaeid shrimp is
more than 1 percent, by weight, of all fish comprising its on-board or
landed catch.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 622.4, paragraph (a)(1)(iii) is removed; in the first
sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(B), the phrase ``effective July 15,
2003,'' is removed; paragraph (r)(12) is removed; paragraph (a)(1)(iv)
is redesignated as (a)(1)(iii); and paragraph (a)(2)(xiii) is added to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.4 Permits and fees.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(xiii) South Atlantic penaeid shrimp. For a person aboard a trawler
to fish for penaeid shrimp in the South Atlantic EEZ or possess penaeid
shrimp in or from the South Atlantic EEZ, a valid commercial vessel
permit for South Atlantic penaeid shrimp must have been issued to the
vessel and must be on board.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 622.5, the first sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(i) is revised
and paragraph (a)(1)(vii) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.5 Recordkeeping and reporting.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(vii) South Atlantic rock or penaeid shrimp. The owner or operator
of a vessel for which a commercial permit for South Atlantic rock
shrimp or South Atlantic penaeid shrimp has been issued, as required
under Sec. 622.4(a)(2)(viii) or (xiii), respectively, or whose vessel
fishes for or lands South Atlantic rock shrimp or South Atlantic
penaeid shrimp in or from state waters adjoining the Atlantic EEZ, who
is selected to report by the SRD must maintain a fishing record on a
form available from the SRD and must submit such record as specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) * * *
(i) Completed fishing records required by paragraphs (a)(1)(i),
(ii), (iv), (vi), and (vii) of this section must be submitted to the
SRD postmarked not later than 7 days after the end of each fishing
trip. * * *
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 622.7, paragraphs (aa) and (cc) are revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 622.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(aa) Falsify information submitted regarding an application for
testing a BRD or regarding testing of a BRD, as specified in Sec.
622.41(g)(3)(i) or (h)(3).
* * * * *
(cc) Operate or own a vessel that is required to have a permitted
operator aboard when the vessel is at sea or offloading without such
operator aboard, as specified in Sec. 622.4(a)(5)(i) through (iv).
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 622.8, paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.8 At-sea observer coverage.
(a) * * *
(4) South Atlantic rock or penaeid shrimp. A vessel for which a
Federal commercial permit for South Atlantic rock shrimp or South
Atlantic penaeid shrimp has been issued must carry a NMFS-approved
observer, if the vessel's trip is selected by the SRD for observer
coverage.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 622.9, the first sentence of paragraph (a) is revised to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.9 Vessel monitoring systems (VMSs).
(a) Requirement for use. An owner or operator of a vessel that has
been issued a limited access endorsement for South
[[Page 73388]]
Atlantic rock shrimp must ensure that such vessel has a NMFS-approved,
operating VMS on board when on a trip in the South Atlantic. * * *
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 622.17, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.17 South Atlantic golden crab controlled access.
(a) General. In accordance with the procedures specified in the
Fishery Management Plan for the Golden Crab Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region, initial commercial vessel permits have been issued for
the fishery. All permits in the fishery are issued on a fishing-year
(calendar-year) basis. No additional permits may be issued except for
the northern zone as follows:
(1) The RA will issue up to two new vessel permits for the northern
zone. Selection will be made from the list of historical participants
in the South Atlantic golden crab fishery. Such list was used at the
October 1995 meeting of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council
and was prioritized based on pounds of golden crab landed, without
reference to a specific zone. Individuals on the list who originally
received permits will be deleted from the list.
(2) The RA will offer in writing an opportunity to apply for a
permit for the northern zone to the individuals highest on the list
until two individuals accept and apply in a timely manner. An offer
that is not accepted within 30 days after it is received will no longer
be valid.
(3) An application for a permit from an individual who accepts the
RA's offer must be received by the RA no later than 30 days after the
date of the individual's acceptance. Application forms are available
from the RA.
(4) A vessel permit for the northern zone issued under paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, and any successor permit, may not be changed to
another zone. A successor permit includes a permit issued to that
vessel for a subsequent owner and a permit issued via transfer from
that vessel to another vessel.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 622.18 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.18 South Atlantic snapper-grouper limited access.
(a) General. The only valid commercial vessel permits for South
Atlantic snapper-grouper are those that have been issued under the
limited access criteria specified in the Fishery Management Plan for
the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region. A commercial
vessel permit for South Atlantic snapper-grouper is either a
transferable commercial permit or a trip-limited commercial permit.
(b) Transfers of permits. A snapper-grouper limited access permit
is valid only for the vessel and owner named on the permit. To change
either the vessel or the owner, an application for transfer must be
submitted to the RA.
(1) Transferable permits. (i) An owner of a vessel with a
transferable permit may request that the RA transfer the permit to
another vessel owned by the same entity.
(ii) A transferable permit may be transferred upon a change of
ownership of a permitted vessel with such permit from one to another of
the following: husband, wife, son, daughter, brother, sister, mother,
or father.
(iii) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section, a person desiring to acquire a limited access, transferable
permit for South Atlantic snapper-grouper must obtain and exchange two
such permits for one new permit.
(iv) A transfer of a permit that is undertaken under paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section will constitute a transfer of the vessel's
entire catch history to the new owner.
(2) Trip-limited permits. An owner of a vessel with a trip- limited
permit may request that the RA transfer the permit to another vessel
owned by the same entity.
(c) Renewal. NMFS will not reissue a commercial vessel permit for
South Atlantic snapper-grouper if the permit is revoked or if the RA
does not receive an application for renewal within 60 days of the
permit's expiration date.
0
10. Section 622.19 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.19 South Atlantic rock shrimp limited access.
(a) Applicability. For a person aboard a vessel to fish for rock
shrimp in the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia or off Florida or possess
rock shrimp in or from the South Atlantic EEZ off Georgia or off
Florida, a limited access endorsement for South Atlantic rock shrimp
must be issued to the vessel and must be on board.
(b) Transfer of an endorsement. A limited access endorsement for
South Atlantic rock shrimp is valid only for the vessel and owner named
on the permit/endorsement. To change either the vessel or the owner, an
application for transfer must be submitted to the RA. An owner of a
vessel with an endorsement may request that the RA transfer the
endorsement to another vessel owned by the same entity, to the same
vessel owned by another entity, or to another vessel with another
owner. A transfer of an endorsement under this paragraph will include
the transfer of the vessel's entire catch history of South Atlantic
rock shrimp to a new owner; no partial transfers are allowed.
(c) Renewal. The RA will not reissue a limited access endorsement
for South Atlantic rock shrimp if the endorsement is revoked or if the
RA does not receive a complete application for renewal of the
endorsement within 1 year after the endorsement's expiration date.
(d) Non-renewal of inactive endorsements. In addition to the
sanctions and denials specified in Sec. 622.4(j)(1), a limited access
endorsement for South Atlantic rock shrimp that is inactive for a
period of 4 consecutive calendar years will not be renewed. For the
purpose of this paragraph, ``inactive'' means that the vessel with the
endorsement has not landed at least 15,000 lb (6,804 kg) of rock shrimp
from the South Atlantic EEZ in a calendar year.
(e) Reissuance of non-renewed permits. A permit that is not renewed
under paragraph (d) of this section will be made available to a vessel
owner randomly selected from a list of owners who had documented
landings of rock shrimp from the South Atlantic EEZ prior to 1996 but
who did not qualify for an initial limited access endorsement. Owners'
names have been placed on the list in accordance with the procedures
specified in the FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region.
0
11. In Sec. 622.41, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 622.41 Species specific limitations.
* * * * *
(g) Rock and penaeid shrimp in the South Atlantic--(1) BRD
requirements. Except as exempted in paragraph (g)(4) of this section,
BRDs are required as follows:
(i) On a penaeid shrimp trawler in the South Atlantic EEZ, each
trawl net that is rigged for fishing and has a mesh size less than 2.50
inches (6.35 cm), as measured between the centers of opposite knots
when pulled taut, and each try net that is rigged for fishing and has a
headrope length longer than 16.0 ft (4.9 m), must have a certified BRD
installed.
(ii) On a vessel that fishes for or possesses rock shrimp in the
South Atlantic EEZ, each trawl net or try net that is rigged for
fishing must have a certified BRD installed.
(iii) A trawl net or try net is rigged for fishing if it is in the
water, or if it is
[[Page 73389]]
shackled, tied, or otherwise connected to a sled, door, or other device
that spreads the net, or to a tow rope, cable, pole, or extension,
either on board or attached to a shrimp trawler.
(2) Certified BRDs. The following BRDs are certified for use in the
South Atlantic EEZ. Specifications of these certified BRDs are
contained in Appendix D of this part.
(i) Extended funnel.
(ii) Expanded mesh.
(iii) Fisheye.
(iv) Gulf fisheye.
(v) Jones-Davis.
(3) Certification of additional BRDs. (i) A person who proposes a
BRD for certification for use in the South Atlantic EEZ must submit an
application to test such BRD, conduct the testing, and submit the
results of the test in accordance with the Bycatch Reduction Device
Testing Protocol Manual, which is available from the RA upon request.
(ii) For a new BRD to be certified, it must be statistically
demonstrated that in testing under the Bycatch Reduction Device Testing
Protocol Manual the BRD can reduce the total weight of finfish taken as
bycatch by at least 30 percent.
(iii) If a BRD meets the certification criterion, as determined
under the testing protocol, NMFS will publish a notice in the Federal
Register adding the BRD to the list of certified BRDs in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section and providing the specifications for the newly
certified BRD, including any special conditions deemed appropriate
based on the certification testing results.
(4) Limited exemption. A rock or penaeid shrimp trawler that is
authorized by the RA to test a BRD in the EEZ for possible
certification, has such written authorization on board, and is
conducting such test in accordance with the Bycatch Reduction Device
Testing Protocol Manual is granted a limited exemption from the BRD
requirement specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this section. The
exemption from the BRD requirement is limited to those trawls that are
being used in the certification trials. All other trawls rigged for
fishing must be equipped with certified BRDs.
* * * * *
0
12. In Table 4 of Appendix A to Part 622--South Atlantic Snapper-
Grouper, the section heading, Serranidae-Sea Basses and Groupers, and
the species listed under that heading are revised to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 622--Species Tables
* * * * *
Table 4 of Appendix A to Part 622--South Atlantic Snapper-Grouper
* * * * *
Serranidae--Groupers
Rock hind, Epinephelus adscensionis
Graysby, Epinephelus cruentatus
Speckled hind, Epinephelus drummondhayi
Yellowedge grouper, Epinephelus flavolimbatus
Coney, Epinephelus fulvus
Red hind, Epinephelus guttatus
Goliath grouper, Epinephelus itajara
Red grouper, Epinephelus morio
Misty grouper, Epinephelus mystacinus
Warsaw grouper, Epinephelus nigritus
Snowy grouper, Epinephelus niveatus
Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus
Black grouper, Mycteroperca bonaci
Yellowmouth grouper, Mycteroperca interstitialis
Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis
Scamp, Mycteroperca phenax
Tiger grouper, Mycteroperca tigris
Yellowfin grouper, Mycteroperca venenosa
Serranidae--Sea Basses
Bank sea bass, Centropristis ocyurus
Rock sea bass, Centropristis philadelphica
Black sea bass, Centropristis striata
* * * * *
PART 622--[Nomenclature change]
13. In part 622, revise all references to ``jewfish'' to read
``goliath grouper'' wherever it appears.
[FR Doc. 05-23929 Filed 12-9-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S