Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, 73485-73486 [05-23888]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Notices
Sodium azide explosive mixture.
Sodium dinitro-ortho-cresolate.
Sodium nitrate explosive mixtures.
Sodium nitrate-potassium nitrate
explosive mixture.
Sodium picramate.
Special fireworks.
Squibs.
Styphnic acid explosives.
Nitroparaffins Explosive Grade and
ammonium nitrate mixtures.
Nitrostarch.
Nitro-substituted carboxylic acids.
Nitrourea.
O
Octogen [HMX].
Octol [75 percent HMX, 25 percent
TNT].
Organic amine nitrates.
Organic nitramines.
T
P
PBX [plastic bonded explosives].
Pellet powder.
Penthrinite composition.
Pentolite.
Perchlorate explosive mixtures.
Peroxide based explosive mixtures.
PETN [nitropentaerythrite,
pentaerythrite tetranitrate,
pentaerythritol tetranitrate].
Picramic acid and its salts.
Picramide.
Picrate explosives.
Picrate of potassium explosive mixtures.
Picratol.
Picric acid (manufactured as an
explosive).
Picryl chloride.
Picryl fluoride.
PLX [95% nitromethane, 5%
ethylenediamine].
Polynitro aliphatic compounds.
Polyolpolynitrate-nitrocellulose
explosive gels.
Potassium chlorate and lead
sulfocyanate explosive.
Potassium nitrate explosive mixtures.
Potassium nitroaminotetrazole.
Pyrotechnic compositions.
PYX [2,6-bis(picrylamino)] 3,5dinitropyridine.
R
RDX [cyclonite, hexogen, T4, cyclo1,3,5,-trimethylene-2,4,6,trinitramine; hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitroS-triazine].
S
Safety fuse.
Salts of organic amino sulfonic acid
explosive mixture.
Salutes (bulk).
Silver acetylide.
Silver azide.
Silver fulminate.
Silver oxalate explosive mixtures.
Silver styphnate.
Silver tartrate explosive mixtures.
Silver tetrazene.
Slurried explosive mixtures of water,
inorganic oxidizing salt, gelling agent,
fuel, and sensitizer (cap sensitive).
Smokeless powder.
Sodatol.
Sodium amatol.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
Tacot [tetranitro-2,3,5,6-dibenzo1,3a,4,6a tetrazapentalene].
TATB [triaminotrinitrobenzene].
TATP [triacetonetriperoxide].
TEGDN [triethylene glycol dinitrate].
Tetranitrocarbazole.
Tetrazene [tetracene, tetrazine, 1(5tetrazolyl)-4-guanyl tetrazene
hydrate].
Tetrazole explosives.
Tetryl [2,4,6 tetranitro-N-methylaniline].
Tetrytol.
Thickened inorganic oxidizer salt
slurried explosive mixture.
TMETN [trimethylolethane trinitrate].
TNEF [trinitroethyl formal].
TNEOC [trinitroethylorthocarbonate].
TNEOF [trinitroethylorthoformate].
TNT [trinitrotoluene, trotyl, trilite,
triton].
Torpex.
Tridite.
Trimethylol ethyl methane trinitrate
composition.
Trimethylolthane trinitratenitrocellulose.
Trimonite.
Trinitroanisole.
Trinitrobenzene.
Trinitrobenzoic acid.
Trinitrocresol.
Trinitro-meta-cresol.
Trinitronaphthalene.
Trinitrophenetol.
Trinitrophloroglucinol.
Trinitroresorcinol.
Tritonal.
U
Urea nitrate.
W
Water-bearing explosives having salts of
oxidizing acids and nitrogen bases,
sulfates, or sulfamates (cap sensitive).
Water-in-oil emulsion explosive
compositions.
X
Xanthamonas hydrophilic colloid
explosive mixture.
Approved: December 2, 2005.
Carl J. Truscott,
Director.
[FR Doc. E5–7183 Filed 12–9–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73485
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection
requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. This is the second notice for public
comment; the first was published in the
Federal Register at 70 FR 55174, and
one comment was received. NSF is
forwarding the proposed renewal
submission to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance
simultaneously with the publication of
this second notice. Comments regarding
(a) whether the collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology should be
addressed to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for National Science
Foundation, 725–17th Street, NW. Room
10235, Washington, DC 20503, and to
Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance
Officer, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295,
Arlington, Virginia 22230 or send e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov. Comments
regarding these information collections
are best assured of having their full
effect if received within 30 days of this
notification. Copies of the submission(s)
may be obtained by calling 703–292–
7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number
and the agency informs potential
persons who are to respond to the
collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
73486
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 237 / Monday, December 12, 2005 / Notices
Comment: On September 20, 2005, we
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 55174) a 60-day notice of our intent
to request renewal of this information
collection authority from OMB. In that
notice, we solicited public comments
for 60 days ending November 21, 2005.
One comment was received in response
to the public notice from B. Sachau of
Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail on
September 20, 2005. Ms. Sachau
objected to the information collection
but had no specific suggestions for
altering the data collection plans other
than suggesting that ‘‘ * * * (t)he
‘‘bonds’’ between NSF and industry
have become far too strong, so that the
full public interest is becoming lost with
this agency.’’
Response: NSF believes that because
the comment does not pertain to the
collection of information on the
required forms for which NSF is seeking
OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with
the clearance request.
Title: Grantee Reporting Requirements
for Science and Technology Centers
(STC): Integrative Partnerships.
OMB Control Number: 3145–0194.
Abstract: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) requests extension of
data collection (annual reports) called
‘‘Grantee Reporting Requirements for
Science and Technology Centers (STC):
Integrative Partnerships’’. The current
data collection, designed to measure the
Science and Technology Centers’
progress and plans, had been approved
for use through January 2006. The
annual reports have proven an effective
means for efficiently gathering data from
Centers. The data gathered through the
annual reports under the current OMB
approval has been used in making
decisions about continued funding of
individual Centers. In addition, a
database of Centers’ characteristics,
activities, and outcomes has been
created using data from these annual
reports.
The Science and Technology Centers
(STC): Integrative Partnerships Program
supports innovation in the integrative
conduct of research, education and
knowledge transfer. Science and
Technology Centers build intellectual
and physical infrastructure within and
between disciplines, weaving together
knowledge creation, knowledge
integration, and knowledge transfer.
STCs conduct world-class research
through partnerships of academic
institutions, national laboratories,
industrial organizations, and/or other
public/private entities. Thus, new
knowledge created is meaningfully
linked to society.
In addition, STCs enable and foster
excellence in education, the integration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Dec 09, 2005
Jkt 208001
of research and education, and the
creation of bonds between learning and
inquiry so that discovery and creativity
more fully support the learning process.
STCs capitalize on diversity through
participation in Center activities and
demonstrate leadership in the
involvement of groups
underrepresented in science and
engineering.
All Centers will be required to submit
annual reports on progress and plans
that are used as a basis for performance
review and determining the level of
continued funding. This continues the
practice established under the
previously approved data collection. To
support this review and the
management of a Center, new STCs are
required to develop a set of management
and performance indicators (continuing
Centers have already developed these
indicators). These indicators are
submitted annually to NSF via
FastLane. These indicators are both
quantitative and descriptive and
include, for example, the characteristics
of Center personnel and students;
sources of financial support and in-kind
support; expenditures by operational
component; characteristics of industrial
and/or other sector participation;
research activities; education activities;
knowledge transfer activities; patents
and licenses; publications; degrees
granted to students involved in Center
activities; descriptions of significant
advances and other outcomes of the
STCs efforts. The reporting will be
added to the STC program database that
has been compiled by an NSF
evaluation technical assistance
contractor to support decisions for
continued funding of the Centers and
will be made available for the 2007
program evaluation. This database
captures specific information that
demonstrates progress towards
achieving the goals of the individual
Centers and the goals of the program.
Such reporting requirements are
included in the cooperative agreement
that is binding between the academic
institution and the NSF.
Each Center’s annual report provides
information about the following
categories of activities: (1) Research, (2)
education, (3) knowledge transfer, (4)
partnerships, (5) diversity, (6)
management, and (7) budget issues.
For each of the categories the report
describes overall objectives for the year,
problems the Center has encountered in
making progress towards goals for the
year, specific outputs and outcomes for
the year, and expected accomplishments
and anticipated problems in the coming
year.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Use of the Information: NSF will use
the information to make decisions on
continued funding for the Centers, to
evaluate the yearly progress of the
program and to inform the upcoming
2007 Program Evaluation. The data will
be analyzed to evaluate progress
towards specific goals of the STC
program.
Estimate of Burden: Total hours per
center are estimated to be 90–120 hours,
on average approximately 100 hours; the
maximum burden is expected in the
first year of reporting. In the years that
follow, the burden often is reduced
given that a Center’s internal practices
and procedures are established. In most
cases, the burden in subsequent years is
reduced to 75% of the hourly burden in
the first year, although we provide
estimates allowing for the average
maximum anticipated effort in the first
year.
Total number of hours for 17 centers:
approximately 1700 hours.
Respondents: Non-profit institutions;
federal government.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Report: One from each of the 13 funded
Centers and 4 anticipated Centers.
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05–23888 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–M
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
National Science Foundation.
Submission for OMB review;
comment request.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 237 (Monday, December 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73485-73486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23888]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) has submitted the
following information collection requirement to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.
This is the second notice for public comment; the first was published
in the Federal Register at 70 FR 55174, and one comment was received.
NSF is forwarding the proposed renewal submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance simultaneously with the
publication of this second notice. Comments regarding (a) whether the
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
burden including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology should
be addressed to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB,
Attention: Desk Officer for National Science Foundation, 725-17th
Street, NW. Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, and to Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington, Virginia 22230 or send e-mail
to splimpto@nsf.gov. Comments regarding these information collections
are best assured of having their full effect if received within 30 days
of this notification. Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by
calling 703-292-7556.
NSF may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless
the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such persons are not required to
respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 73486]]
Comment: On September 20, 2005, we published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 55174) a 60-day notice of our intent to request renewal
of this information collection authority from OMB. In that notice, we
solicited public comments for 60 days ending November 21, 2005. One
comment was received in response to the public notice from B. Sachau of
Florham Park, NJ, via e-mail on September 20, 2005. Ms. Sachau objected
to the information collection but had no specific suggestions for
altering the data collection plans other than suggesting that `` * * *
(t)he ``bonds'' between NSF and industry have become far too strong, so
that the full public interest is becoming lost with this agency.''
Response: NSF believes that because the comment does not pertain to
the collection of information on the required forms for which NSF is
seeking OMB approval, NSF is proceeding with the clearance request.
Title: Grantee Reporting Requirements for Science and Technology
Centers (STC): Integrative Partnerships.
OMB Control Number: 3145-0194.
Abstract: The National Science Foundation (NSF) requests extension
of data collection (annual reports) called ``Grantee Reporting
Requirements for Science and Technology Centers (STC): Integrative
Partnerships''. The current data collection, designed to measure the
Science and Technology Centers' progress and plans, had been approved
for use through January 2006. The annual reports have proven an
effective means for efficiently gathering data from Centers. The data
gathered through the annual reports under the current OMB approval has
been used in making decisions about continued funding of individual
Centers. In addition, a database of Centers' characteristics,
activities, and outcomes has been created using data from these annual
reports.
The Science and Technology Centers (STC): Integrative Partnerships
Program supports innovation in the integrative conduct of research,
education and knowledge transfer. Science and Technology Centers build
intellectual and physical infrastructure within and between
disciplines, weaving together knowledge creation, knowledge
integration, and knowledge transfer. STCs conduct world-class research
through partnerships of academic institutions, national laboratories,
industrial organizations, and/or other public/private entities. Thus,
new knowledge created is meaningfully linked to society.
In addition, STCs enable and foster excellence in education, the
integration of research and education, and the creation of bonds
between learning and inquiry so that discovery and creativity more
fully support the learning process. STCs capitalize on diversity
through participation in Center activities and demonstrate leadership
in the involvement of groups underrepresented in science and
engineering.
All Centers will be required to submit annual reports on progress
and plans that are used as a basis for performance review and
determining the level of continued funding. This continues the practice
established under the previously approved data collection. To support
this review and the management of a Center, new STCs are required to
develop a set of management and performance indicators (continuing
Centers have already developed these indicators). These indicators are
submitted annually to NSF via FastLane. These indicators are both
quantitative and descriptive and include, for example, the
characteristics of Center personnel and students; sources of financial
support and in-kind support; expenditures by operational component;
characteristics of industrial and/or other sector participation;
research activities; education activities; knowledge transfer
activities; patents and licenses; publications; degrees granted to
students involved in Center activities; descriptions of significant
advances and other outcomes of the STCs efforts. The reporting will be
added to the STC program database that has been compiled by an NSF
evaluation technical assistance contractor to support decisions for
continued funding of the Centers and will be made available for the
2007 program evaluation. This database captures specific information
that demonstrates progress towards achieving the goals of the
individual Centers and the goals of the program. Such reporting
requirements are included in the cooperative agreement that is binding
between the academic institution and the NSF.
Each Center's annual report provides information about the
following categories of activities: (1) Research, (2) education, (3)
knowledge transfer, (4) partnerships, (5) diversity, (6) management,
and (7) budget issues.
For each of the categories the report describes overall objectives
for the year, problems the Center has encountered in making progress
towards goals for the year, specific outputs and outcomes for the year,
and expected accomplishments and anticipated problems in the coming
year.
Use of the Information: NSF will use the information to make
decisions on continued funding for the Centers, to evaluate the yearly
progress of the program and to inform the upcoming 2007 Program
Evaluation. The data will be analyzed to evaluate progress towards
specific goals of the STC program.
Estimate of Burden: Total hours per center are estimated to be 90-
120 hours, on average approximately 100 hours; the maximum burden is
expected in the first year of reporting. In the years that follow, the
burden often is reduced given that a Center's internal practices and
procedures are established. In most cases, the burden in subsequent
years is reduced to 75% of the hourly burden in the first year,
although we provide estimates allowing for the average maximum
anticipated effort in the first year.
Total number of hours for 17 centers: approximately 1700 hours.
Respondents: Non-profit institutions; federal government.
Estimated Number of Responses per Report: One from each of the 13
funded Centers and 4 anticipated Centers.
Comments: Comments are invited on (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Dated: December 6, 2005.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 05-23888 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M