Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval, and Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards; Notice of Second Technical Conference, 73230-73231 [E5-7094]
Download as PDF
73230
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2005 / Notices
docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502–8659. A copy is also available
for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item h. above.
All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital
letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’, ‘‘REPLY
COMMENTS’’,
‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS’’, ‘‘TERMS
AND CONDITIONS’’, or
‘‘PRESCRIPTIONS’’; (2) set forth in the
heading the name of the applicant and
the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish
the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the
filing; and (4) otherwise comply with
the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001
through 385.2005. All comments,
recommendations, terms and
conditions, or prescriptions must set
forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from
the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all
persons listed on the service list
prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
4.34(b), and 385.2010.
You may also register online at
https://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm
to be notified via e-mail of new filings
and issuances related to this or other
pending projects. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support.
n. Procedural schedule: The
Commission staff proposes to issue an
Environmental Assessment (EA) rather
than issuing a draft and final EA. Staff
intends to allow at least 30 days for
entities to comment on the EA, and will
take into consideration all comments
received on the EA before final action is
taken on the license application. The
application will be processed according
to the following schedule, but revisions
to the schedule may be made as
appropriate:
Issue Notice of availability of the EA:
March 31, 2006.
Ready for Commission decision on
the application: May 30, 2006.
Final amendments to the application
must be filed with the Commission no
later than 30 days from the issuance
date of the notice of ready for
environmental analysis.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
California Independent System
Operator Corporation; Notice of
Technical Conference Agenda
December 1, 2005.
As announced in the Notice of
Technical Conference issued on
November 21, 2005, the Commission
Staff will convene a technical
conference on Wednesday, December 7,
2005, from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. (EST), at
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC, in a room to be
announced at a later date. The technical
conference will address the issues
identified in the interventions and
protests filed in this docket, as well as
the responses in the CAISO’s answer to
those interventions and protests.
Please take notice of the conference
agenda below:
I. Opening remarks by Commission Staff
II. Presentation by the CAISO
III. Discussion
IV. Comments from Staff
Conferences are accessible under
section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973. For accessibility accommodations
please send an e-mail to
accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free 1–
866–208–3372 (voice) or 202–208–1659
(TTY), or send a FAX to 202–208–2106
with the required accommodations.
For more information about the
conference, including participant access
information, please contact: Connie
Caldwell at (202) 502–6489 or
connie.caldwell@ferc.gov, or Marion
Whitaker at (202) 502–8264 or
marion.whitaker@ferc.gov.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7092 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7142 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Dec 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
[Docket No. RM05–30–000]
[ Docket No. ER05–1501–000]
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rules Concerning Certification of the
Electric Reliability Organization; and
Procedures for the Establishment,
Approval, and Enforcement of Electric
Reliability Standards; Notice of Second
Technical Conference
December 1, 2005.
As announced in a Notice of
Technical Conferences issued on
November 3, 2005, in the above
referenced proceeding, a second
technical conference will be held in the
offices of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC. All
interested persons may attend, and
registration is not required. This will be
a staff conference, but Commissioners
may attend.
The second technical conference will
take place on December 9, 2005 from
9:30 a.m. until approximately 3 p.m.
(EST) and will be held in the
Commission Meeting Room on the
second floor of the Commission.
Attached is the agenda for this
conference.
This second technical conference will
address how to establish electric
reliability standards, state roles in
reliability, and issues related to
compliance and enforcement of
standards, and North American
perspectives of these issues. It follows
up on issues discussed in the first
technical conference of November 18,
2005, which addressed current and
possible future procedures for
establishment and approval of electric
reliability standards.
Transcripts of the conference will be
immediately available from Ace
Reporting Company (202–347–3700 or
1–800–336–6646) for a fee. They will be
available for the public on the
Commission’s eLibrary system seven
calendar days after the Commission
receives the transcript.
A free Webcast of this event is
available through https://www.ferc.gov.
Anyone with Internet access who
desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to www.ferc.gov’s Calendar
of Events and locating this event in the
Calendar. The event will contain a link
to its Webcast. The Capitol Connection
provides technical support for the
Webcasts. It also offers access to this
event via television in the DC area and
via phone bridge for a fee. If you have
any questions, visit https://
www.CapitolConnection.org or contact
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2005 / Notices
Danelle Perkowski or David Reininger at
703–993–3100.
Commission conferences are
accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For
accessibility accommodations please
send an e-mail to accessibility@ferc.gov
or call toll free 866–208–3372 (voice) or
202–208–1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to
202–208–2106 with the required
accommodations.
For more information about the
conference, please contact Mary Cain at
(202) 502–6337 (mary.cain@ferc.gov) or
Sarah McKinley at (202) 502–8004
(sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov).
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
Appendix A—Second Technical
Conference on Electric Reliability
Standards; Reliability Standards; States
Role in Reliability; Compliance and
Enforcement of Standards Agenda
December 9, 2005.
9:30 a.m.—Opening Remarks
Joseph Kelliher, Commission Chairman.
9:45 a.m.—Introductions
Joseph McClelland, Director, Division of
Reliability, Office of Markets,Tariffs, and
Rates, Commission.
10 a.m.—Panel I: Establishing and Processing
Electric Reliability Standards.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct
2005) authorizes the Commission to
approve standards that provide for
reliable operation of the bulk power
system and to remand those that do not.
The panelists will provide insight into the
following questions:
• What criteria should be used to
determine reliability standards?
• How should ‘‘best practices’’ be
incorporated into developing reliability
standards?
• What process should the Commission
use in evaluating reliability standards?
• What are the implications for the
Electricity Reliability Organization (ERO) if a
reliability standard is remanded?
• What process should be used by the ERO
for handling remanded reliability standards?
• How are entities such as distribution
providers, load serving entities, generator
owners, generator operators, etc. covered by
the reliability standards approved by the
Commission?
Participants:
Natural Resources Canada (invited).
Energy Regulatory Commission Mexico
(invited).
North American Electric Reliability
Council (invited).
ISO/RTO Council (invited).
North American Energy Standards Board
(invited).
Electric Power Supply Association
(invited).
11:15 a.m.—Break.
11:30 a.m.—Panel II: State and Provincial
Role in Reliability.
EPAct 2005 states that it does not preempt
the authority of any state to take action
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Dec 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
to ensure the safety, adequacy, and
reliability of electric service within that
state, as long as such action is not
inconsistent with any reliability
standard. It also directs the Commission
to establish a regional advisory body of
at least two-thirds of the states within a
region petition. A regional advisory body
shall be composed of one member from
each participating state in the region,
appointed by the Governor of each state,
and may include representatives of
agencies, states, and provinces outside
the United States.
The panelists will provide insight into the
following questions:
• What role should states and provinces
play with regard to reliability standards?
• How should the Commission receive
input for approval of reliability
standards from the states, provinces,
Regional Entities, and ERO?
• What test should the Commission use to
determine whether a state-developed
rule conflicts with reliability standards?
• When should Regional Advisory Bodies
be convened and for what purpose?
• What role should the states, provinces,
Regional Entities, ERO, and the
Commission play in determining
resource adequacy?
Participants:
Florida Public Service Commission
(invited).
New York Public Service Commission
(invited).
Western Governors Association (invited).
Alberta Department of Energy (invited).
National Association of Regulatory Utility
Commissioners (invited).
Southwest Power Pool Regional State
Committee (invited).
National Association of State Utility
Consumer Advocates (invited).
Organization of Midwest ISO States
(invited).
1 p.m.–1:45 p.m.—LUNCH
1:45 p.m.—Panel III: Compliance and
Enforcement.
EPAct 2005 gives the ERO the power to
enforce reliability standards with
penalties for violation of standards
approved by the Commission, and to file
notice and record of the proceeding with
the Commission. Penalties shall be
subject to review by the Commission.
The Commission may take such action as
is necessary or appropriate against the
ERO or a regional entity to ensure
compliance with a reliability standard or
any Commission order affecting the ERO
or a regional entity.
The panelists will discuss the following
questions:
• What process should be used to monitor
reliability standards compliance and
determine violations?
• How should the ERO coordinate and
oversee the regional entities’ compliance
efforts?
• How should penalties be determined?
How should violations be disclosed?
• What data should the Commission and
the ERO collect to enforce reliability
standards?
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73231
• Should there be different levels of
penalties for different types of reliability
standards?
• How do self-regulatory organizations
assure compliance, conduct
investigations, and coordinate
enforcement with federal agencies?
Participants:
North American Electric Reliability
Council (invited).
Institute for Nuclear Power Operation
(invited).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(invited).
National Association of Securities Dealers
(invited).
Edison Electric Institute (invited).
3 p.m.—Closing Remarks.
[FR Doc. E5–7094 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM98–1–000]
Records Governing Off-the Record
Communications; Public Notice
December 1, 2005.
This constitutes notice, in accordance
with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt
of prohibited and exempt off-the-record
communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,
September 22, 1999) requires
Commission decisional employees, who
make or receive a prohibited or exempt
off-the-record communication relevant
to the merits of a contested proceeding,
to deliver to the Secretary of the
Commission, a copy of the
communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication.
Prohibited communications are
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73230-73231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7094]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM05-30-000]
Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric Reliability
Organization; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval, and
Enforcement of Electric Reliability Standards; Notice of Second
Technical Conference
December 1, 2005.
As announced in a Notice of Technical Conferences issued on
November 3, 2005, in the above referenced proceeding, a second
technical conference will be held in the offices of the Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC. All interested persons may attend,
and registration is not required. This will be a staff conference, but
Commissioners may attend.
The second technical conference will take place on December 9, 2005
from 9:30 a.m. until approximately 3 p.m. (EST) and will be held in the
Commission Meeting Room on the second floor of the Commission. Attached
is the agenda for this conference.
This second technical conference will address how to establish
electric reliability standards, state roles in reliability, and issues
related to compliance and enforcement of standards, and North American
perspectives of these issues. It follows up on issues discussed in the
first technical conference of November 18, 2005, which addressed
current and possible future procedures for establishment and approval
of electric reliability standards.
Transcripts of the conference will be immediately available from
Ace Reporting Company (202-347-3700 or 1-800-336-6646) for a fee. They
will be available for the public on the Commission's eLibrary system
seven calendar days after the Commission receives the transcript.
A free Webcast of this event is available through https://
www.ferc.gov. Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this
event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and
locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to
its Webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the
Webcasts. It also offers access to this event via television in the DC
area and via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
https://www.CapitolConnection.org or contact
[[Page 73231]]
Danelle Perkowski or David Reininger at 703-993-3100.
Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an e-mail to accessibility@ferc.gov or call toll free 866-208-3372
(voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the
required accommodations.
For more information about the conference, please contact Mary Cain
at (202) 502-6337 (mary.cain@ferc.gov) or Sarah McKinley at (202) 502-
8004 (sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov).
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
Appendix A--Second Technical Conference on Electric Reliability
Standards; Reliability Standards; States Role in Reliability;
Compliance and Enforcement of Standards Agenda
December 9, 2005.
9:30 a.m.--Opening Remarks
Joseph Kelliher, Commission Chairman.
9:45 a.m.--Introductions
Joseph McClelland, Director, Division of Reliability, Office of
Markets,Tariffs, and Rates, Commission.
10 a.m.--Panel I: Establishing and Processing Electric Reliability
Standards.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) authorizes the
Commission to approve standards that provide for reliable operation
of the bulk power system and to remand those that do not.
The panelists will provide insight into the following questions:
What criteria should be used to determine reliability
standards?
How should ``best practices'' be incorporated into
developing reliability standards?
What process should the Commission use in evaluating
reliability standards?
What are the implications for the Electricity
Reliability Organization (ERO) if a reliability standard is
remanded?
What process should be used by the ERO for handling
remanded reliability standards?
How are entities such as distribution providers, load
serving entities, generator owners, generator operators, etc.
covered by the reliability standards approved by the Commission?
Participants:
Natural Resources Canada (invited).
Energy Regulatory Commission Mexico (invited).
North American Electric Reliability Council (invited).
ISO/RTO Council (invited).
North American Energy Standards Board (invited).
Electric Power Supply Association (invited).
11:15 a.m.--Break.
11:30 a.m.--Panel II: State and Provincial Role in Reliability.
EPAct 2005 states that it does not preempt the authority of any
state to take action to ensure the safety, adequacy, and reliability
of electric service within that state, as long as such action is not
inconsistent with any reliability standard. It also directs the
Commission to establish a regional advisory body of at least two-
thirds of the states within a region petition. A regional advisory
body shall be composed of one member from each participating state
in the region, appointed by the Governor of each state, and may
include representatives of agencies, states, and provinces outside
the United States.
The panelists will provide insight into the following questions:
What role should states and provinces play with regard
to reliability standards?
How should the Commission receive input for approval of
reliability standards from the states, provinces, Regional Entities,
and ERO?
What test should the Commission use to determine
whether a state-developed rule conflicts with reliability standards?
When should Regional Advisory Bodies be convened and
for what purpose?
What role should the states, provinces, Regional
Entities, ERO, and the Commission play in determining resource
adequacy?
Participants:
Florida Public Service Commission (invited).
New York Public Service Commission (invited).
Western Governors Association (invited).
Alberta Department of Energy (invited).
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
(invited).
Southwest Power Pool Regional State Committee (invited).
National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
(invited).
Organization of Midwest ISO States (invited).
1 p.m.-1:45 p.m.--LUNCH
1:45 p.m.--Panel III: Compliance and Enforcement.
EPAct 2005 gives the ERO the power to enforce reliability
standards with penalties for violation of standards approved by the
Commission, and to file notice and record of the proceeding with the
Commission. Penalties shall be subject to review by the Commission.
The Commission may take such action as is necessary or appropriate
against the ERO or a regional entity to ensure compliance with a
reliability standard or any Commission order affecting the ERO or a
regional entity.
The panelists will discuss the following questions:
What process should be used to monitor reliability
standards compliance and determine violations?
How should the ERO coordinate and oversee the regional
entities' compliance efforts?
How should penalties be determined? How should
violations be disclosed?
What data should the Commission and the ERO collect to
enforce reliability standards?
Should there be different levels of penalties for
different types of reliability standards?
How do self-regulatory organizations assure compliance,
conduct investigations, and coordinate enforcement with federal
agencies?
Participants:
North American Electric Reliability Council (invited).
Institute for Nuclear Power Operation (invited).
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (invited).
National Association of Securities Dealers (invited).
Edison Electric Institute (invited).
3 p.m.--Closing Remarks.
[FR Doc. E5-7094 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P