Solicitation of New Safe Harbors and Special Fraud Alerts, 73186-73187 [05-23624]
Download as PDF
73186
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2005 / Proposed Rules
procedure by submitting written
comments in accordance with the
instructions outlined earlier in this
notice.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This proposed action merely
proposes to approve a redesignation to
attainment and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Redesignation of an area to
attainment under section 107 of the
Clean Air Act is an action that affects
the attainment status of a geographical
area and does not impose any new
regulatory requirements on sources.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve a redesignation to
attainment and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a redesignation to
attainment and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 Dec 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law 104–113,
section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS) in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impracticable. VCS are
technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that
are developed or adopted by VCS
bodies. This action does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, EPA did
not consider the use of any VCS. This
proposed rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 28, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 05–23808 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of Inspector General
42 CFR Part 1001
Solicitation of New Safe Harbors and
Special Fraud Alerts
Office of Inspector General
(OIG), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent to develop
regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
205 of the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of
1996, this annual notice solicits
proposals and recommendations for
developing new and modifying existing
safe harbor provisions under the Federal
anti-kickback statute (section 1128B(b)
of the Social Security Act), as well as
developing new OIG Special Fraud
Alerts.
DATES: To assure consideration, public
comments must be delivered to the
address provided below by no later than
5 p.m. on February 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Please mail or deliver your
written comments to the following
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
address: Office of Inspector General,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: OIG–101–N, Room
5246, Cohen Building, 330
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
We do not accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission. In
commenting, please refer to file code
OIG–101–N. Comments received timely
will be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, in Room 5541 of the
Office of Inspector General at 330
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, on Monday through
Friday of each week from 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel
Schaer, (202) 619–0089, OIG
Regulations Officer.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. OIG Safe Harbor Provisions
Section 1128B(b) of the Social
Security Act (the Act) (42 U.S.C. 1320a–
7b(b)) provides criminal penalties for
individuals or entities that knowingly
and willfully offer, pay, solicit or
receive remuneration in order to induce
or reward business reimbursable under
the Federal health care programs. The
offense is classified as a felony and is
punishable by fines of up to $25,000
and imprisonment for up to 5 years. OIG
may also impose civil money penalties,
in accordance with section 1128A(a)(7)
of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a)(7)), or
exclusion from the Federal health care
programs, in accordance with section
1128(b)(7) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–
7(b)(7)).
Since the statute on its face is so
broad, concern has been expressed for
many years that some relatively
innocuous commercial arrangements
may be subject to criminal prosecution
or administrative sanction. In response
to the above concern, the Medicare and
Medicaid Patient and Program
Protection Act of 1987, section 14 of
Public Law 100–93, specifically
required the development and
promulgation of regulations, the socalled ‘‘safe harbor’’ provisions,
specifying various payment and
business practices which, although
potentially capable of inducing referrals
of business reimbursable under the
Federal health care programs, would not
be treated as criminal offenses under the
anti-kickback statute and would not
serve as a basis for administrative
sanctions. OIG safe harbor provisions
have been developed ‘‘to limit the reach
of the statute somewhat by permitting
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 236 / Friday, December 9, 2005 / Proposed Rules
certain non-abusive arrangements, while
encouraging beneficial and innocuous
arrangements’’ (56 FR 35952, July 29,
1991). Health care providers and others
may voluntarily seek to comply with
these provisions so that they have the
assurance that their business practices
will not be subject to any enforcement
action under the anti-kickback statute or
related administrative authorities.
To date, OIG has developed and
codified in 42 CFR 1001.952 a total of
22 final safe harbors that describe
practices that are sheltered from
liability.
B. OIG Special Fraud Alerts
OIG has also periodically issued
Special Fraud Alerts to give continuing
guidance to health care providers with
respect to practices OIG finds
potentially fraudulent or abusive. The
Special Fraud Alerts encourage industry
compliance by giving providers
guidance that can be applied to their
own practices. OIG Special Fraud Alerts
are intended for extensive distribution
directly to the health care provider
community, as well as to those charged
with administering the Federal health
care programs.
In developing these Special Fraud
Alerts, OIG has relied on a number of
sources and has consulted directly with
experts in the subject field, including
those within OIG, other agencies of the
Department, other Federal and State
agencies, and those in the health care
industry. To date, OIG has issued 12
individual Special Fraud Alerts.
C. Section 205 of Public Law 104–191
Section 205 of Public Law 104–191
requires the Department to develop and
publish an annual notice in the Federal
Register formally soliciting proposals
for modifying existing safe harbors to
the anti-kickback statute and for
developing new safe harbors and
Special Fraud Alerts.
In developing safe harbors for a
criminal statute, OIG is required to
engage in a thorough review of the range
of factual circumstances that may fall
within the proposed safe harbor subject
area so as to uncover potential
opportunities for fraud and abuse. Only
then can OIG determine, in consultation
with the Department of Justice, whether
it can effectively develop regulatory
limitations and controls that will permit
beneficial and innocuous arrangements
within a subject area while, at the same
time, protecting the Federal health care
programs and their beneficiaries from
abusive practices.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 Dec 08, 2005
Jkt 208001
II. Solicitation of Additional New
Recommendations and Proposals
In accordance with the requirements
of section 205 of Public Law 104–191,
OIG last published a Federal Register
solicitation notice for developing new
safe harbors and Special Fraud Alerts on
December 10, 2004 (69 FR 71766). As
required under section 205, a status
report of the public comments received
in response to that notice is set forth in
Appendix F to the OIG’s Semiannual
Report covering the period April 1,
2005, through September 30, 2005.1 OIG
is not seeking additional public
comment on the proposals listed in
Appendix F at this time. Rather, this
notice seeks additional
recommendations regarding the
development of proposed or modified
safe harbor regulations and new Special
Fraud Alerts beyond those summarized
in Appendix F to the OIG Semiannual
Report referenced above.
A. Criteria for Modifying and
Establishing Safe Harbor Provisions
In accordance with section 205 of
HIPAA, we will consider a number of
factors in reviewing proposals for new
or modified safe harbor provisions, such
as the extent to which the proposals
would affect an increase or decrease in:
• Access to health care services,
• The quality of services,
• Patient freedom of choice among
health care providers,
• Competition among health care
providers,
• The cost to Federal health care
programs,
• The potential overutilization of the
health care services, and
• The ability of health care facilities
to provide services in medically
underserved areas or to medically
underserved populations.
In addition, we will also take into
consideration other factors, including,
for example, the existence (or
nonexistence) of any potential financial
benefit to health care professionals or
providers that may take into account
their decisions whether to (1) order a
health care item or service or (2) arrange
for a referral of health care items or
services to a particular practitioner or
provider.
B. Criteria for Developing Special Fraud
Alerts
In determining whether to issue
additional Special Fraud Alerts, we will
also consider whether, and to what
extent, the practices that would be
1 The OIG Semiannual Report can be accessed
through the OIG Web site at https://oig.hhs.gov/
publications/semiannual.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
73187
identified in a new Special Fraud Alert
may result in any of the consequences
set forth above, as well as the volume
and frequency of the conduct that
would be identified in the Special Fraud
Alert.
A detailed explanation of
justifications for, or empirical data
supporting, a suggestion for a safe
harbor or Special Fraud Alert would be
helpful and should, if possible, be
included in any response to this
solicitation.
Dated: November 30, 2005.
Daniel R. Levinson,
Inspector General.
[FR Doc. 05–23624 Filed 12–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
48 CFR Parts 208, 252, and 253 and
Appendix B to Chapter 2
[DFARS Case 2003–D072]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Required
Sources of Supply
Department of Defense (DoD).
Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
update text addressing acquisitions
made through Government supply
sources. This proposed rule is a result
of a transformation initiative undertaken
by DoD to dramatically change the
purpose and content of the DFARS.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
February 7, 2006, to be considered in
the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by DFARS Case 2003–D072,
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Defense Acquisition Regulations
Web Site: https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/
dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2003–D072 in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: (703) 602–0350.
• Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Robin
Schulze, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DAR),
IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3062.
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73186-73187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23624]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of Inspector General
42 CFR Part 1001
Solicitation of New Safe Harbors and Special Fraud Alerts
AGENCY: Office of Inspector General (OIG), HHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent to develop regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 205 of the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, this annual notice
solicits proposals and recommendations for developing new and modifying
existing safe harbor provisions under the Federal anti-kickback statute
(section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act), as well as developing
new OIG Special Fraud Alerts.
DATES: To assure consideration, public comments must be delivered to
the address provided below by no later than 5 p.m. on February 7, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Please mail or deliver your written comments to the
following address: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health
and Human Services, Attention: OIG-101-N, Room 5246, Cohen Building,
330 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20201.
We do not accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. In
commenting, please refer to file code OIG-101-N. Comments received
timely will be available for public inspection as they are received,
generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after publication of a
document, in Room 5541 of the Office of Inspector General at 330
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, on Monday through Friday of
each week from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Schaer, (202) 619-0089, OIG
Regulations Officer.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. OIG Safe Harbor Provisions
Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act (the Act) (42 U.S.C.
1320a-7b(b)) provides criminal penalties for individuals or entities
that knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit or receive
remuneration in order to induce or reward business reimbursable under
the Federal health care programs. The offense is classified as a felony
and is punishable by fines of up to $25,000 and imprisonment for up to
5 years. OIG may also impose civil money penalties, in accordance with
section 1128A(a)(7) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a)(7)), or exclusion
from the Federal health care programs, in accordance with section
1128(b)(7) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a-7(b)(7)).
Since the statute on its face is so broad, concern has been
expressed for many years that some relatively innocuous commercial
arrangements may be subject to criminal prosecution or administrative
sanction. In response to the above concern, the Medicare and Medicaid
Patient and Program Protection Act of 1987, section 14 of Public Law
100-93, specifically required the development and promulgation of
regulations, the so-called ``safe harbor'' provisions, specifying
various payment and business practices which, although potentially
capable of inducing referrals of business reimbursable under the
Federal health care programs, would not be treated as criminal offenses
under the anti-kickback statute and would not serve as a basis for
administrative sanctions. OIG safe harbor provisions have been
developed ``to limit the reach of the statute somewhat by permitting
[[Page 73187]]
certain non-abusive arrangements, while encouraging beneficial and
innocuous arrangements'' (56 FR 35952, July 29, 1991). Health care
providers and others may voluntarily seek to comply with these
provisions so that they have the assurance that their business
practices will not be subject to any enforcement action under the anti-
kickback statute or related administrative authorities.
To date, OIG has developed and codified in 42 CFR 1001.952 a total
of 22 final safe harbors that describe practices that are sheltered
from liability.
B. OIG Special Fraud Alerts
OIG has also periodically issued Special Fraud Alerts to give
continuing guidance to health care providers with respect to practices
OIG finds potentially fraudulent or abusive. The Special Fraud Alerts
encourage industry compliance by giving providers guidance that can be
applied to their own practices. OIG Special Fraud Alerts are intended
for extensive distribution directly to the health care provider
community, as well as to those charged with administering the Federal
health care programs.
In developing these Special Fraud Alerts, OIG has relied on a
number of sources and has consulted directly with experts in the
subject field, including those within OIG, other agencies of the
Department, other Federal and State agencies, and those in the health
care industry. To date, OIG has issued 12 individual Special Fraud
Alerts.
C. Section 205 of Public Law 104-191
Section 205 of Public Law 104-191 requires the Department to
develop and publish an annual notice in the Federal Register formally
soliciting proposals for modifying existing safe harbors to the anti-
kickback statute and for developing new safe harbors and Special Fraud
Alerts.
In developing safe harbors for a criminal statute, OIG is required
to engage in a thorough review of the range of factual circumstances
that may fall within the proposed safe harbor subject area so as to
uncover potential opportunities for fraud and abuse. Only then can OIG
determine, in consultation with the Department of Justice, whether it
can effectively develop regulatory limitations and controls that will
permit beneficial and innocuous arrangements within a subject area
while, at the same time, protecting the Federal health care programs
and their beneficiaries from abusive practices.
II. Solicitation of Additional New Recommendations and Proposals
In accordance with the requirements of section 205 of Public Law
104-191, OIG last published a Federal Register solicitation notice for
developing new safe harbors and Special Fraud Alerts on December 10,
2004 (69 FR 71766). As required under section 205, a status report of
the public comments received in response to that notice is set forth in
Appendix F to the OIG's Semiannual Report covering the period April 1,
2005, through September 30, 2005.\1\ OIG is not seeking additional
public comment on the proposals listed in Appendix F at this time.
Rather, this notice seeks additional recommendations regarding the
development of proposed or modified safe harbor regulations and new
Special Fraud Alerts beyond those summarized in Appendix F to the OIG
Semiannual Report referenced above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The OIG Semiannual Report can be accessed through the OIG
Web site at https://oig.hhs.gov/publications/semiannual.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Criteria for Modifying and Establishing Safe Harbor Provisions
In accordance with section 205 of HIPAA, we will consider a number
of factors in reviewing proposals for new or modified safe harbor
provisions, such as the extent to which the proposals would affect an
increase or decrease in:
Access to health care services,
The quality of services,
Patient freedom of choice among health care providers,
Competition among health care providers,
The cost to Federal health care programs,
The potential overutilization of the health care services,
and
The ability of health care facilities to provide services
in medically underserved areas or to medically underserved populations.
In addition, we will also take into consideration other factors,
including, for example, the existence (or nonexistence) of any
potential financial benefit to health care professionals or providers
that may take into account their decisions whether to (1) order a
health care item or service or (2) arrange for a referral of health
care items or services to a particular practitioner or provider.
B. Criteria for Developing Special Fraud Alerts
In determining whether to issue additional Special Fraud Alerts, we
will also consider whether, and to what extent, the practices that
would be identified in a new Special Fraud Alert may result in any of
the consequences set forth above, as well as the volume and frequency
of the conduct that would be identified in the Special Fraud Alert.
A detailed explanation of justifications for, or empirical data
supporting, a suggestion for a safe harbor or Special Fraud Alert would
be helpful and should, if possible, be included in any response to this
solicitation.
Dated: November 30, 2005.
Daniel R. Levinson,
Inspector General.
[FR Doc. 05-23624 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-P