Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Chesapeake Bay, 72964-72967 [05-23753]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
72964
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
unsatisfactory for the purpose of the
consent.
(3) Copy of consent must be provided
to taxpayer. The tax return preparer
must provide a copy of the executed
consent to the taxpayer at the time of
execution. The requirements of this
paragraph may also be satisfied by
giving the taxpayer the opportunity, at
the time of executing the consent, to
print the completed consent or save it
in electronic form.
(d) Permissible disclosures to third
parties at the request of the taxpayer. A
tax return preparer may disclose tax
return information to third parties as the
taxpayer directs so long as the taxpayer
provides a consent to disclose tax return
information that satisfies the
requirements of this paragraph and as
prescribed by the Commissioner by
revenue procedure. (See § 601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter.)
(e) Effective date. This section applies
on the date that is 30 days after the final
regulations are published in the Federal
Register.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E5–7018 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05–05–130]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Chesapeake Bay
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary special local
regulation during the ‘‘Volvo Ocean
Race 2005–2006’’, sailboat races to be
held on the waters of the Chesapeake
Bay in the vicinity east of Gibson Island,
Maryland and near the William Preston
Lane Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay)
Bridge near Annapolis, Maryland. These
special local regulations are necessary to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the event. This
action is intended to restrict vessel
traffic in segments of the Chesapeake
Bay during the sailboat races.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
February 6, 2006.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
You may mail comments
and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431
Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia
23704–5004, hand-deliver them to
Room 119 at the same address between
9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays, or fax
them to (757) 398–6203. The Auxiliary
and Recreational Boating Safety Branch,
Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at the above
address between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ron Houck, Project Manager, Marine
Information Specialist, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, at (410) 576–2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–05–130),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to the address
listed under ADDRESSES explaining why
one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
During April and May 2006, Ocean
Race Chesapeake, Inc. will host the
Chesapeake Bay visit of the ‘‘Volvo
Ocean Race 2005–2006’’. Two sailboat
racing events are planned during this
period to be conducted on the waters of
the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of
the William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial
(Chesapeake Bay) Bridge near
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Annapolis, Maryland. The first event
will be the ‘‘In Port Race’’ on April 29,
2006 that will take place on the
Chesapeake Bay approximately 5 miles
east of Gibson Island, Maryland and
about 8 miles north of the Chesapeake
Bay Bridge. The second event will be
the ‘‘Leg 6 Re-Start’’ of the 2005–2006
Volvo Round the World Race, on May
7, 2006 that will take place on the
Chesapeake Bay between Thomas Point
and Sandy Point, near Annapolis,
Maryland.
Both events will consist of
approximately eight 70-foot long sailing
vessels that will participate in both the
‘‘In Port Race’’ and a carefully organized
‘‘Re-Start’’ to a highly publicized,
international sailing race. The restart
will consist of opposing teams that will
be maneuvering in a predetermined area
within the Chesapeake Channel adjacent
to the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial
(Chesapeake Bay) Bridge Main Channel
Span. A fleet of spectator vessels is
anticipated to gather nearby to view the
competition for both events. Because of
the danger posed by many sailing
vessels maneuvering in close proximity
of each other during the in port race and
at the beginning of the race restart,
special local regulations are necessary.
For the safety concerns noted and to
address the need for vessel control to
facilitate a fair and accurate restart,
vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Chesapeake Bay.
The ‘‘In Port Race’’ segment of the
regulated area will include a squareshaped section of the Chesapeake Bay,
four nautical miles long on each side,
located approximately 17 nautical miles
southeast of Baltimore’s Inner Harbor.
The center of the race course is
approximately five nautical miles east of
Gibson Island, Maryland. The duration
of the race is expected to be three hours
and spectator anchorage areas will be
designated. The ‘‘Leg 6 Re-Start’’
segment of the regulated area will
include a rectangle-shaped area of the
Chesapeake Bay, 6 nautical miles long
and 1.5 nautical miles wide, located
approximately 13 nautical miles east of
Annapolis Harbor. The actual starting
line for this event lies south of the
William P. Lane, Jr. Memorial
(Chesapeake Bay) Bridge, Maryland. The
duration of the event is expected to be
three hours and spectator anchorage
areas will be designated. The temporary
special local regulations will be
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
enforced from 10:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
April 29, 2006 for the ‘‘In Port Race,’’
and from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 7,
2006 for the ‘‘Leg 6 Re-Start,’’ and will
restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the sailboat race.
The Coast Guard, at its discretion, when
practical will allow the passage of
vessels when races are not taking place.
Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel will be
allowed to enter or remain in the
regulated area during the enforcement
period. These regulations are needed to
control vessel traffic during the event to
enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation
will prevent traffic from transiting a
segment of the Chesapeake Bay in the
vicinity of the William P. Lane, Jr.
Memorial (Chesapeake Bay) Bridge
during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the regulated
area will be enforced. Extensive advance
notifications will be made to the
maritime community via Local Notice to
Mariners, marine information
broadcasts, area newspapers and local
radio stations, so mariners can adjust
their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
these sections of the Chesapeake Bay
during these events.
This proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period. Although the regulated area will
apply to two separate segments of the
Chesapeake Bay, traffic may be allowed
to pass through the regulated areas with
the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. In the case where the
Patrol Commander authorizes passage
through a regulated area during an
event, vessels shall proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course that minimizes wake near
the race course. Although this
regulation prevents traffic from
transiting the Chesapeake Channel of
the Chesapeake Bay during the Re-Start
event, the effect of this regulation will
not be significant because of its limited
duration. Before the enforcement
period, we will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the address
listed under ADDRESSES. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72965
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
72966
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Effect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine parade permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h),
of the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule. Comments on this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
section will be considered before we
make the final decision on whether to
categorically exclude this rule from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From 10:30 a.m. on April 29, 2006
through 5 p.m. on May 7, 2006, add a
temporary § 100.35–T05–130 to read as
follows:
§ 100.35–T05–130
Annapolis, MD.
Chesapeake Bay, near
(a) Regulated area includes two
segments within the waters of the
Chesapeake Bay. (1) The first segment
for the ‘‘In Port Race’’ is a square-shaped
area, four nautical miles long on each
side, bounded by a line drawn from a
position at latitude 39°03′08″ N,
longitude 076°21′38″ W, thence easterly
to a position at latitude 39°03′08″ N,
longitude 076°16′32″ W, thence
northerly to a position at latitude
39°07′06″ N, longitude 076°16′32″ W,
thence westerly to a position at latitude
39°07′06″ N, longitude 076°21′38″ W,
thence southerly to a position at latitude
39°03′08″ N, longitude 076°21′38″ W,
the point of origin.
(i) There are three designated
spectator areas for the first segment. The
first spectator area lies northeast of the
mouth of the Magothy River, Maryland
and is approximately 3000 yards long
and 500 yards wide, bounded by a line
drawn from a position at latitude,
39°04′05″ N, longitude 076°20′27″ W,
thence northeasterly to a position at
latitude 39°04′14″ N, longitude
076°20′12″ W, thence northwesterly to a
position at latitude 39°05′23″ N,
longitude 076°21′25″ W, thence
southwesterly to position at latitude
39°05′13″ N, longitude 076°21′40″ W,
thence southeasterly to a position at
latitude 39°04′05″ N, longitude
076°20′27″ W, the point of origin.
(ii) The second spectator area lies
northwest of the mouth of the Chester
River, Maryland and is approximately
2200 yards long and 500 yards wide,
bounded by a line drawn from a
position at latitude, 39°04′13″ N,
longitude 076°17′22″ W, thence
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
northeasterly to a position at latitude
39°05′15″ N, longitude 076°16′32″ W,
thence northwesterly to a position at
latitude 39°05′23″ N, longitude
076°16′51″ W, thence southwesterly to
position at latitude 39°04′28″ N,
longitude 076°17′37″ W, thence
southeasterly to a position at latitude
39°04′13″ N, longitude 076°17′22″ W,
the point of origin.
(iii) The third spectator area lies
between Belvidere Shoal and Swan
Point Bar, Maryland and is
approximately 4800 yards long and 500
yards wide, bounded by a line drawn
from a position at latitude, 39°05′30″ N,
longitude 076°21′28″ W, thence
northeasterly to a position at latitude
39°06′48″ N, longitude 076°19′32″ W,
thence easterly to a position at latitude
39°06′48″ N, longitude 076°18′25″ W,
thence southeasterly to position at
latitude 39°05′28″ N, longitude
076°16′42″ W, thence northeasterly to a
position at latitude 39°05′38″ N,
longitude 076°16′32″ W, thence
northwesterly to a position at latitude
39°07′01″ N, longitude 076°18′13″ W,
thence westerly to a position at latitude
39°07′01″ N, longitude 076°19′35″ W,
thence southwesterly to position at
latitude 39°05′43″ N, longitude
076°21′40″ W, thence southeasterly to a
position at latitude 39°05′30″ N,
longitude 076°21′28″ W, the point of
origin.
(2) The second segment for the ‘‘Leg
6 Re-Start’’ is a rectangle-shaped area,
approximately six nautical miles long
and 1.5 nautical miles wide, bounded
by a line drawn from a position at
latitude, 38°54′38″ N, longitude
076°26′44″ W, thence easterly to a
position at latitude 38°54′11″ N,
longitude 076°24′49″ W, thence
northerly to a position at latitude
38°59′40″ N, longitude 076°21′42″ W,
thence westerly to position at latitude
39°00′05″ N, longitude 076°23′33″ W,
thence southerly to a position at latitude
38°54′38″ N, longitude 076°26′44″ W,
the point of origin.
(i) There are two designated spectator
areas for the second segment. The first
spectator area lies east of the mouth of
the Severn River, Maryland and is
approximately three nautical miles long
and 500 yards wide, bounded by a line
drawn from a position at latitude,
38°56′32″ N, longitude 076°25′31″ W,
thence easterly to a position at latitude
38°56′30″ N, longitude 076°25′13″ W ,
thence northerly to a position at latitude
38°59′13″ N, longitude 076°23′38″ W,
thence westerly to position at latitude
38°59′20″ N, longitude 076°23′55″ W,
thence southerly to a position at latitude
38°56′32″ N, longitude 076°25′31″ W,
the point of origin.
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 235 / Thursday, December 8, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The second spectator area lies
west of Kent Island, Maryland and is
approximately three nautical miles long
and 500 yards wide, bounded by a line
drawn from a position at latitude,
38°56′17″ N, longitude 076°24′12″ W,
thence easterly to a position at latitude
38°56′06″ N, longitude 076°23′53″ W,
thence northerly to a position at latitude
38°58′50″ N, longitude 076°22′17″ W,
thence westerly to position at latitude
38°58′57″ N, longitude 076°22′37″ W,
thence southerly to a position at latitude
38°56′17″ N, longitude 076°24′12″ W,
the point of origin.
(3) All coordinates reference Datum
NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means any commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any person
or vessel authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(3) Participant includes all vessels
participating in the Volvo Ocean Race
under the auspices of the Marine Event
Permit issued to the event sponsor and
approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for the Official Patrol,
participants, and persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) Any person in the regulated area
must stop immediately when directed to
do so by any Official Patrol and then
proceed only as directed.
(3) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must stop the vessel
immediately when directed to do so by
any Official Patrol and then proceed
only as directed.
(4) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Official Patrol.
(5) When authorized to transit within
the regulated area, all vessels shall
proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course that
minimizes wake near the race course
and near other persons and vessels in
the designated spectator areas.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced for the ‘‘In Port Race’’
from 10:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April
29, 2006, and from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on
May 7, 2006 for the ‘‘Leg 6 Re-Start’’. If
the ‘‘In Port Race’’ is postponed due to
inclement weather, then the temporary
special local regulations will be
enforced at the same time period during
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:15 Dec 07, 2005
Jkt 208001
one of the next four days, April 30, 2006
through May 3, 2006.
Dated: November 27, 2005.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05–23753 Filed 12–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–05–102]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Housatonic River, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
temporarily change the drawbridge
operating regulations governing the
operation of the U.S. 1 Bridge, mile 3.5,
across the Housatonic River at Stratford,
Connecticut. This notice of proposed
rulemaking would allow the bridge
owner to open only one of the two
moveable spans for bridge openings at
various times from January 2, 2006
through September 1, 2006, to facilitate
bridge rehabilitation. Full bridge
openings would be available at various
times during the above time period after
a seven-day notice is given by calling
the number posted at the bridge.
DATES: Comments must reach the Coast
Guard on or before December 23, 2005.
You may mail comments to
Commander (obr), First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch, One South
Street, Battery Park Building, New York,
New York, 10004, or deliver them to the
same address between 7 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except,
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is (212) 668–7165. The First Coast
Guard District, Bridge Branch,
maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will
become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at
the First Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District, (212) 668–7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72967
Regulatory Information
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
publishing an NPRM with a shortened
comment period of 15 days and under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard also
finds that good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
The shortened comment period and
making this rule effective in less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register will allow this rule to become
effective in time for the January 2, 2006,
project start date. This action is
necessary because the bridge owner did
not become fully aware of the
contractor’s need to temporarily change
the bridge regulations to perform the
work until recently.
The Coast Guard believes a shortened
comment period is reasonable because
the bridge rehabilitation construction
scheduled to begin on January 2, 2006,
is necessary, vital, work that must to be
performed as soon as possible in order
to assure the safe continued reliable
operation of the U.S. 1 Bridge.
Any delay in making this rule
effective would not be in the best
interest of public safety and the marine
interests that use the Housatonic River
because failure to start the rehabilitation
repairs on time could result in an
unscheduled bridge operation failure.
There is only one commercial facility
operator that normally requires the
bridge to open; however, that facility
will not be in service during the time
period this rule will be in effect. The
recreational vessels that normally use
this waterway are small enough in size
that they can either pass under the
spans without a bridge opening or safely
pass through the bridge with a single
span opening.
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments or related material. If you do
so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD01–05–102),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know if they reached us, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period. We may
change this proposed rule in view of
them.
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 235 (Thursday, December 8, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72964-72967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23753]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD05-05-130]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Chesapeake Bay
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary special
local regulation during the ``Volvo Ocean Race 2005-2006'', sailboat
races to be held on the waters of the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity
east of Gibson Island, Maryland and near the William Preston Lane Jr.
Memorial (Chesapeake Bay) Bridge near Annapolis, Maryland. These
special local regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the event. This action is intended to
restrict vessel traffic in segments of the Chesapeake Bay during the
sailboat races.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before February 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander
(oax), Fifth Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
Virginia 23704-5004, hand-deliver them to Room 119 at the same address
between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays, or fax them to (757) 398-6203. The Auxiliary and Recreational
Boating Safety Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District, maintains the public
docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received from the
public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will be
available for inspection or copying at the above address between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ron Houck, Project Manager, Marine
Information Specialist, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, at (410)
576-2674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-05-
130), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to the address listed under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
During April and May 2006, Ocean Race Chesapeake, Inc. will host
the Chesapeake Bay visit of the ``Volvo Ocean Race 2005-2006''. Two
sailboat racing events are planned during this period to be conducted
on the waters of the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of the William
Preston Lane Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay) Bridge near Annapolis,
Maryland. The first event will be the ``In Port Race'' on April 29,
2006 that will take place on the Chesapeake Bay approximately 5 miles
east of Gibson Island, Maryland and about 8 miles north of the
Chesapeake Bay Bridge. The second event will be the ``Leg 6 Re-Start''
of the 2005-2006 Volvo Round the World Race, on May 7, 2006 that will
take place on the Chesapeake Bay between Thomas Point and Sandy Point,
near Annapolis, Maryland.
Both events will consist of approximately eight 70-foot long
sailing vessels that will participate in both the ``In Port Race'' and
a carefully organized ``Re-Start'' to a highly publicized,
international sailing race. The restart will consist of opposing teams
that will be maneuvering in a predetermined area within the Chesapeake
Channel adjacent to the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay)
Bridge Main Channel Span. A fleet of spectator vessels is anticipated
to gather nearby to view the competition for both events. Because of
the danger posed by many sailing vessels maneuvering in close proximity
of each other during the in port race and at the beginning of the race
restart, special local regulations are necessary. For the safety
concerns noted and to address the need for vessel control to facilitate
a fair and accurate restart, vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the Chesapeake Bay. The ``In Port
Race'' segment of the regulated area will include a square-shaped
section of the Chesapeake Bay, four nautical miles long on each side,
located approximately 17 nautical miles southeast of Baltimore's Inner
Harbor. The center of the race course is approximately five nautical
miles east of Gibson Island, Maryland. The duration of the race is
expected to be three hours and spectator anchorage areas will be
designated. The ``Leg 6 Re-Start'' segment of the regulated area will
include a rectangle-shaped area of the Chesapeake Bay, 6 nautical miles
long and 1.5 nautical miles wide, located approximately 13 nautical
miles east of Annapolis Harbor. The actual starting line for this event
lies south of the William P. Lane, Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay)
Bridge, Maryland. The duration of the event is expected to be three
hours and spectator anchorage areas will be designated. The temporary
special local regulations will be
[[Page 72965]]
enforced from 10:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April 29, 2006 for the ``In
Port Race,'' and from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 7, 2006 for the ``Leg 6
Re-Start,'' and will restrict general navigation in the regulated area
during the sailboat race. The Coast Guard, at its discretion, when
practical will allow the passage of vessels when races are not taking
place. Except for participants and vessels authorized by the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel will be allowed to enter or
remain in the regulated area during the enforcement period. These
regulations are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to
enhance the safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this proposed regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a segment of the Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of the
William P. Lane, Jr. Memorial (Chesapeake Bay) Bridge during the event,
the effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the
limited duration that the regulated area will be enforced. Extensive
advance notifications will be made to the maritime community via Local
Notice to Mariners, marine information broadcasts, area newspapers and
local radio stations, so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit these sections of the
Chesapeake Bay during these events.
This proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
proposed rule would be in effect for only a limited period. Although
the regulated area will apply to two separate segments of the
Chesapeake Bay, traffic may be allowed to pass through the regulated
areas with the permission of the Coast Guard Patrol Commander. In the
case where the Patrol Commander authorizes passage through a regulated
area during an event, vessels shall proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course that minimizes wake near the race
course. Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting the
Chesapeake Channel of the Chesapeake Bay during the Re-Start event, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant because of its
limited duration. Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime
advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 72966]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Effect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine parade permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule. Comments on this
section will be considered before we make the final decision on whether
to categorically exclude this rule from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. From 10:30 a.m. on April 29, 2006 through 5 p.m. on May 7, 2006,
add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-130 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-130 Chesapeake Bay, near Annapolis, MD.
(a) Regulated area includes two segments within the waters of the
Chesapeake Bay. (1) The first segment for the ``In Port Race'' is a
square-shaped area, four nautical miles long on each side, bounded by a
line drawn from a position at latitude 39[deg]03'08'' N, longitude
076[deg]21'38'' W, thence easterly to a position at latitude
39[deg]03'08'' N, longitude 076[deg]16'32'' W, thence northerly to a
position at latitude 39[deg]07'06'' N, longitude 076[deg]16'32'' W,
thence westerly to a position at latitude 39[deg]07'06'' N, longitude
076[deg]21'38'' W, thence southerly to a position at latitude
39[deg]03'08'' N, longitude 076[deg]21'38'' W, the point of origin.
(i) There are three designated spectator areas for the first
segment. The first spectator area lies northeast of the mouth of the
Magothy River, Maryland and is approximately 3000 yards long and 500
yards wide, bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude,
39[deg]04'05'' N, longitude 076[deg]20'27'' W, thence northeasterly to
a position at latitude 39[deg]04'14'' N, longitude 076[deg]20'12'' W,
thence northwesterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]05'23'' N,
longitude 076[deg]21'25'' W, thence southwesterly to position at
latitude 39[deg]05'13'' N, longitude 076[deg]21'40'' W, thence
southeasterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]04'05'' N, longitude
076[deg]20'27'' W, the point of origin.
(ii) The second spectator area lies northwest of the mouth of the
Chester River, Maryland and is approximately 2200 yards long and 500
yards wide, bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude,
39[deg]04'13'' N, longitude 076[deg]17'22'' W, thence northeasterly to
a position at latitude 39[deg]05'15'' N, longitude 076[deg]16'32'' W,
thence northwesterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]05'23'' N,
longitude 076[deg]16'51'' W, thence southwesterly to position at
latitude 39[deg]04'28'' N, longitude 076[deg]17'37'' W, thence
southeasterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]04'13'' N, longitude
076[deg]17'22'' W, the point of origin.
(iii) The third spectator area lies between Belvidere Shoal and
Swan Point Bar, Maryland and is approximately 4800 yards long and 500
yards wide, bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude,
39[deg]05'30'' N, longitude 076[deg]21'28'' W, thence northeasterly to
a position at latitude 39[deg]06'48'' N, longitude 076[deg]19'32'' W,
thence easterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]06'48'' N, longitude
076[deg]18'25'' W, thence southeasterly to position at latitude
39[deg]05'28'' N, longitude 076[deg]16'42'' W, thence northeasterly to
a position at latitude 39[deg]05'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]16'32'' W,
thence northwesterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]07'01'' N,
longitude 076[deg]18'13'' W, thence westerly to a position at latitude
39[deg]07'01'' N, longitude 076[deg]19'35'' W, thence southwesterly to
position at latitude 39[deg]05'43'' N, longitude 076[deg]21'40'' W,
thence southeasterly to a position at latitude 39[deg]05'30'' N,
longitude 076[deg]21'28'' W, the point of origin.
(2) The second segment for the ``Leg 6 Re-Start'' is a rectangle-
shaped area, approximately six nautical miles long and 1.5 nautical
miles wide, bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude,
38[deg]54'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]26'44'' W, thence easterly to a
position at latitude 38[deg]54'11'' N, longitude 076[deg]24'49'' W,
thence northerly to a position at latitude 38[deg]59'40'' N, longitude
076[deg]21'42'' W, thence westerly to position at latitude
39[deg]00'05'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'33'' W, thence southerly to a
position at latitude 38[deg]54'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]26'44'' W, the
point of origin.
(i) There are two designated spectator areas for the second
segment. The first spectator area lies east of the mouth of the Severn
River, Maryland and is approximately three nautical miles long and 500
yards wide, bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude,
38[deg]56'32'' N, longitude 076[deg]25'31'' W, thence easterly to a
position at latitude 38[deg]56'30'' N, longitude 076[deg]25'13'' W ,
thence northerly to a position at latitude 38[deg]59'13'' N, longitude
076[deg]23'38'' W, thence westerly to position at latitude
38[deg]59'20'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'55'' W, thence southerly to a
position at latitude 38[deg]56'32'' N, longitude 076[deg]25'31'' W, the
point of origin.
[[Page 72967]]
(ii) The second spectator area lies west of Kent Island, Maryland
and is approximately three nautical miles long and 500 yards wide,
bounded by a line drawn from a position at latitude, 38[deg]56'17'' N,
longitude 076[deg]24'12'' W, thence easterly to a position at latitude
38[deg]56'06'' N, longitude 076[deg]23'53'' W, thence northerly to a
position at latitude 38[deg]58'50'' N, longitude 076[deg]22'17'' W,
thence westerly to position at latitude 38[deg]58'57'' N, longitude
076[deg]22'37'' W, thence southerly to a position at latitude
38[deg]56'17'' N, longitude 076[deg]24'12'' W, the point of origin.
(3) All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any person or vessel authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander or approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore.
(3) Participant includes all vessels participating in the Volvo
Ocean Race under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations. (1) Except for the Official Patrol,
participants, and persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
(2) Any person in the regulated area must stop immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol and then proceed only as
directed.
(3) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must stop the
vessel immediately when directed to do so by any Official Patrol and
then proceed only as directed.
(4) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Official Patrol.
(5) When authorized to transit within the regulated area, all
vessels shall proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe
course that minimizes wake near the race course and near other persons
and vessels in the designated spectator areas.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced for the ``In
Port Race'' from 10:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on April 29, 2006, and from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 7, 2006 for the ``Leg 6 Re-Start''. If the ``In
Port Race'' is postponed due to inclement weather, then the temporary
special local regulations will be enforced at the same time period
during one of the next four days, April 30, 2006 through May 3, 2006.
Dated: November 27, 2005.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 05-23753 Filed 12-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
