Fisheries off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Notice of Availability of Amendment 19 to the Pacific Coast Goundfish Fishery Management Plan, 72776-72777 [05-23735]
Download as PDF
72776
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AU58
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants, Notice of Reinstatement of
the 1993 Proposed Rule to List the
Flat-Tailed Horned Lizard as a
Threatened Species
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of reinstatement of
proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
reinstatement of the November 29, 1993,
proposed rule to list the flat-tailed
horned lizard (Phrynosoma mcallii) as a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). On November 17, 2005,
the U.S. District Court for the District of
Arizona vacated the January 3, 2003,
withdrawal of the proposed rule to list
the flat-tailed horned lizard, reinstated
the 1993 proposed rule, and remanded
the matter to us for further
consideration in accordance with its
August 30, 2005, and November 17,
2005, orders. The District Court ordered
us to submit for publication in the
Federal Register, as soon as practicable,
a notice advising the public that the
January 3, 2003, withdrawal has been
vacated and that the 1993 proposed rule
is reinstated, and to submit for
publication in the Federal Register a
new final listing decision on the
proposed rule to list the flat-tailed
horned lizard by April 30, 2006.
Consequently, we are hereby providing
notice that the 1993 proposed rule to list
the flat-tailed horned lizard is
reinstated, and that we will complete a
final listing decision for the flat-tailed
horned lizard by April 30, 2006.
ADDRESSES: The complete file for this
notice is available for inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
6010 Hidden Valley Road, Carlsbad,
California 92011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Bartel, Field Supervisor, at the above
address, by telephone at 760/431–9440,
or by facsimile at 760/431–9624.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The flat-tailed horned lizard
(Phrynosoma mcallii) is a small,
cryptically colored, phrynosomatid
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:00 Dec 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
lizard that reaches a maximum adult
body length (excluding the tail) of
approximately 87 millimeters (3.4
inches). The lizard has a flattened body,
short tail, and dagger-like head spines
like other horned lizards. It is
distinguished from other horned lizards
in its range by a dark vertebral stripe,
two slender elongated occipital spines,
and the absence of external ear
openings. The dorsal surface of the flattailed horned lizard is pale gray to light
rusty brown. The ventral side is white
and unmarked, with the exception of a
prominent umbilical scar.
The flat-tailed horned lizard is
endemic (restricted) to the Sonoran
Desert in southern California, Arizona
and northwestern Mexico. The species
is documented from the Coachella
Valley in Riverside County, California;
the Imperial and Borrego Valleys in
Imperial and eastern San Diego
Counties, California; south of the Gila
River and west of the Gila and Butler
Mountains in Yuma County, Arizona;
east of the Sierra de Juarez in the
Laguna Salada and Yreka Basins in
northeastern Baja California Norte,
Mexico; and north and west of Bahia de
San Jorge to the delta of the Colorado
River in northwestern Sonora, Mexico
(Grismer 2002; Rodriguez 2002). The
flat-tailed horned lizard occurs at
elevations up to 800 meters (2600 feet)
above sea level, but most populations
are below 300 meters (980 feet)
elevation.
On November 29, 1993, we published
a proposed rule to list the flat-tailed
horned lizard as a threatened species
pursuant to the Act (58 FR 62624). On
July 15, 1997, we issued a final decision
to withdraw the 1993 proposed rule (62
FR 37852). Defenders of Wildlife and
other groups challenged the 1997
withdrawal decision. On June 16, 1999,
the District Court for the Southern
District of California granted summary
judgment in our favor upholding our
decision not to list the flat-tailed horned
lizard. However, on July 31, 2001, the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed
the lower court’s ruling and directed the
District Court to remand the matter to us
for further consideration in accordance
with the legal standards outlined in its
opinion (Defenders of Wildlife v.
Norton, 258 F.3d 1136). On October 24,
2001, the District Court for the Southern
District of California remanded the 1997
withdrawal decision. Consistent with
the District Court’s remand order, we
published a withdrawal of the proposed
rule to list the flat-tailed horned lizard
on January 3, 2003 (68 FR 331). The
Tucson Herpetological Society and
other groups challenged this withdrawal
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
decision in the United States District
Court for the District of Arizona.
On August 30, 2005, the District Court
for the District of Arizona issued an
order granting plaintiffs’ motion for
summary judgment ‘‘on the ground that
the Secretary’s withdrawal of the
proposed rule violated the Endangered
Species Act and the Ninth Circuit’s
remand order by failing to evaluate the
lizard’s lost habitat and whether that
habitat was a significant portion of the
range.’’ The court upheld all other
aspects of the January 3, 2003,
withdrawal decision. On November 17,
2005, the District Court issued a
subsequent order, consistent with its
August 30, 2005, order, vacating the
2003 withdrawal and remanding the
matter to us for further consideration.
The District Court reinstated the 1993
proposed rule to list the flat-tailed
horned lizard as a threatened species for
the duration of the remand, and ordered
us to submit for publication in the
Federal Register, as soon as practicable,
a notice advising the public that the
January 3, 2003, withdrawal has been
vacated and that the 1993 proposed rule
is reinstated. The District Court further
ordered us to make a new listing
decision by April 30, 2006, stating that,
‘‘on remand the agency need only
address the matters on which the court’s
August 30, 2005 Order * * * found the
January 3, 2003 Withdrawal unlawful,
which may summarily be identified as
whether the lizard’s lost historical
habitat renders the species in danger of
extinction in a significant portion of its
range.’’
For additional background
information and previous Federal
actions related to the listing
determinations for the flat-tailed horned
lizard, please refer to the January 3,
2003, Federal Register notice (68 FR
331).
Author
The primary author of this notice is
the Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
(see ADDRESSES section).
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: November 30, 2005.
Marshall Jones,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 05–23692 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 7, 2005 / Proposed Rules
National Marine Fisheries Service, Sand
Point Way NE., BIN C15700, Seattle,
WA 98115–0070.
• Fax: (206) 526–6736.
Copies of Amendment 19 or
supporting documents are available
from Maryann Nickerson, (206) 526–
4490.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[I.D. 112905C]
RIN 0648-AT98
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Fisheries off West Coast States and in
the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery; Notice of
Availability of Amendment 19 to the
Pacific Coast Goundfish Fishery
Management Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of an
amendment to a fishery management
plan; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Amendment 19 to the Pacific
Coast Groundfish Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) has been developed by
NMFS and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) to
comply with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
amending the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP) to
describe and identify essential fish
habitat (EFH) for the fishery, designate
Habitat Areas of Particular Concern,
minimize to the extent practicable the
adverse effects of fishing on EFH, and
identify other actions to encourage the
conservation and enhancement of EFH.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 19
must be received on or before February
6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the amendment identified by I.D.
112905C by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: GroundfishEFHFMP.nwr@noaa.gov. Include I.D.
112905C in the subject line of the
message.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Send comments to D. Robert
Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:00 Dec 06, 2005
Jkt 208001
Stephen Copps (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206–526–6187.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires each
Regional Fishery Management Council
to submit any amendment to an FMP to
NMFS for review and approval,
disapproval, or partial approval. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires
that NMFS, upon receiving an
amendment to an FMP, immediately
publish notification in the Federal
Register that the amendment is available
for public review and comment. NMFS
will consider the public comments
received during the comment period
described above in determining whether
to approve, disapprove, or partially
approve Amendment 19.
Section 303(a)(7) of the MagnusonStevens Act requires Fishery
Management Councils to include in
FMPs the description and identification
of EFH for the fishery, and minimization
to the extent practicable the adverse
effects of fishing on EFH. Amendment
19 is supported by a final environmental
impact statement (FEIS) that evaluates a
comprehensive strategy to conserve and
enhance EFH, including its
identification and the implementation
of measures to minimize adverse
impacts to EFH from fishing, to the
extent practicable.
Preparation of the EIS and
Amendment 19 stem from a 2000 court
order in American Oceans Campaign et.
al. v. Daley, Civil Action 99-982 (GK)
(D.D.C. September 14, 2000), which
required NMFS and the Council to
prepare an EIS to evaluate the effects of
fishing on EFH and identify measures to
minimize those impacts to the extent
practicable. NMFS published a draft EIS
for public comment on February 11,
2005. The public comment period on
the draft ended on May 11, 2005. The
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72777
Council identified a final preferred
alternative at their June 13-17, 2005,
meeting in Foster City, CA. NMFS must
approve any FMP amendment and
implementing regulations it deems
necessary by May 6, 2006.
Specific Request for Additional
Comments and Information
A coastwide prohibition on bottom
trawling in all areas within the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) that are
deeper than 700 fm is also included in
the proposed amendment. NMFS is
specifically seeking comment on this
aspect of the amendment as well as the
gear restrictions described above
because they would apply in areas
deeper than 3500 m (11482.9 ft), and,
therefore, would be outside EFH.
Management measures to minimize
adverse impacts on EFH could apply in
the EEZ in areas not described as EFH,
if there is a link between the fishing
activity and adverse effects on EFH.
Additionally, management measures
could be based on the Council’s
discretionary authority under sections
(303(b)(2) and (b)(12) of the MagnusonStevens Act to protect habitat outside
EFH if there is a basis for these
measures. NMFS will consider public
comments and information received on
the proposed rule which has been
submitted for Secretarial review and
approval and on the proposed
Amendment 19 to determine if the
measures should be applied in areas
outside EFH (deeper than 3500 m
(11482.9 ft). NMFS expects to publish
the proposed regulation to implement
Amendment 19 in the near future.
Public comments on Amendment 19
must be received by February 6, 2006,
to be considered by NMFS in the
decision to approve, disapprove, or
partially approve Amendment 19.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 1, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05–23735 Filed 12–6–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72776-72777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23735]
[[Page 72777]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[I.D. 112905C]
RIN 0648-AT98
Fisheries off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Notice of Availability of Amendment
19 to the Pacific Coast Goundfish Fishery Management Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of an amendment to a fishery management
plan; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Amendment 19 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) has been developed by NMFS and the Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council) to comply with the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act)
by amending the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
to describe and identify essential fish habitat (EFH) for the fishery,
designate Habitat Areas of Particular Concern, minimize to the extent
practicable the adverse effects of fishing on EFH, and identify other
actions to encourage the conservation and enhancement of EFH.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 19 must be received on or before February
6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the amendment identified by I.D.
112905C by any of the following methods:
E-mail: GroundfishEFH-FMP.nwr@noaa.gov. Include I.D.
112905C in the subject line of the message.
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Send comments to D. Robert Lohn, Administrator,
Northwest Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, Sand Point Way
NE., BIN C15700, Seattle, WA 98115-0070.
Fax: (206) 526-6736.
Copies of Amendment 19 or supporting documents are available from
Maryann Nickerson, (206) 526-4490.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Copps (Northwest Region,
NMFS), phone: 206-526-6187.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires each
Regional Fishery Management Council to submit any amendment to an FMP
to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial approval. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires that NMFS, upon receiving an
amendment to an FMP, immediately publish notification in the Federal
Register that the amendment is available for public review and comment.
NMFS will consider the public comments received during the comment
period described above in determining whether to approve, disapprove,
or partially approve Amendment 19.
Section 303(a)(7) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act requires Fishery
Management Councils to include in FMPs the description and
identification of EFH for the fishery, and minimization to the extent
practicable the adverse effects of fishing on EFH. Amendment 19 is
supported by a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) that
evaluates a comprehensive strategy to conserve and enhance EFH,
including its identification and the implementation of measures to
minimize adverse impacts to EFH from fishing, to the extent
practicable.
Preparation of the EIS and Amendment 19 stem from a 2000 court
order in American Oceans Campaign et. al. v. Daley, Civil Action 99-982
(GK) (D.D.C. September 14, 2000), which required NMFS and the Council
to prepare an EIS to evaluate the effects of fishing on EFH and
identify measures to minimize those impacts to the extent practicable.
NMFS published a draft EIS for public comment on February 11, 2005. The
public comment period on the draft ended on May 11, 2005. The Council
identified a final preferred alternative at their June 13-17, 2005,
meeting in Foster City, CA. NMFS must approve any FMP amendment and
implementing regulations it deems necessary by May 6, 2006.
Specific Request for Additional Comments and Information
A coastwide prohibition on bottom trawling in all areas within the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) that are deeper than 700 fm is also
included in the proposed amendment. NMFS is specifically seeking
comment on this aspect of the amendment as well as the gear
restrictions described above because they would apply in areas deeper
than 3500 m (11482.9 ft), and, therefore, would be outside EFH.
Management measures to minimize adverse impacts on EFH could apply in
the EEZ in areas not described as EFH, if there is a link between the
fishing activity and adverse effects on EFH. Additionally, management
measures could be based on the Council's discretionary authority under
sections (303(b)(2) and (b)(12) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to protect
habitat outside EFH if there is a basis for these measures. NMFS will
consider public comments and information received on the proposed rule
which has been submitted for Secretarial review and approval and on the
proposed Amendment 19 to determine if the measures should be applied in
areas outside EFH (deeper than 3500 m (11482.9 ft). NMFS expects to
publish the proposed regulation to implement Amendment 19 in the near
future.
Public comments on Amendment 19 must be received by February 6,
2006, to be considered by NMFS in the decision to approve, disapprove,
or partially approve Amendment 19.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: December 1, 2005.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 05-23735 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S